Kyphoplasty

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2501 times

Chapter 18 Kyphoplasty

Balloon kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive option for treating vertebral compression fractures. It can be performed as an outpatient procedure and can provide immediate pain relief. The patient can return to activities of daily living just after the procedure, which stabilizes vertebral fractures and reduces spinal deformity by restoring vertebral body anatomy and height.

The incidence of cement leakage and other procedure-related complications is low, and pain relief has been reported in more than 90% of patients. The procedure time requires 20 to 40 minutes per level, and the medical cost is higher than that of vertebroplasty. Supplementary facet joint injections or medial branch blocks may improve the level of pain relief in some cases.

Preoperative preparation

The physician should obtain a description of the presenting symptoms from the patient, which may include complaints of limitation of motion, and varying degrees of local pain with or without radiation around the trunk and further anteriorly.

The physical examination at the level of the recent fracture(s) reveals corresponding tenderness upon deep palpation and pain provoked by percussion.

The imaging diagnosis would include the following:

Instrumentation

Kyphoplasty Kit

Figure 18-6 illustrates the components of the balloon kyphoplasty system manufactured by Medtronic, Sunnyvale, CA, use of which is described in the procedure section of this chapter:

Procedure

Inserting the Tools into the Fractured Vertebral Body

This step can be accomplished through the transpedicular approach, the extrapedicular approach, or the single posterolateral approach. The selection of approach depends on fracture configuration and the patient’s anatomy.

The single posterolateral approach should be restricted for special cases in which a transpedicular or extrapedicular approach cannot be performed. This approach could promote leakage directly back via the epidural veins to the epidural venous plexus along the anterior aspect of the spinal canal as a result of needle placement in the center of the vertebra rather than in the anterior quarter. Also, this approach carries the possibility of transecting the segmental artery or even injuring the exiting nerve root, because the needle trajectory potentially endangers the nerve root and segmental artery [14].

Please refer to the chapter 19 for the unipedicular approach from pages 266 to 267.

The transpedicular approach using a bipedicular approach is usually performed in lumbar and lower thoracic vertebrae; it is performed as follows:

2. To determine the skin entry site for the bone access needle, align the pedicles between the maximally compressed superior and inferior end plates in a true AP fluoroscopic image (Fig. 18-12A). Then turn the C-arm obliquely until the pedicle can be visualized at its widest and most round (Figs. 18-12B and 18-13). With this view, the skin entry point is at the location of the center of the target pedicle.

The extrapedicular approach is commonly used in the thoracic spine. In contrast to the transpedicular route, the skin entry point in the extrapedicular approach is more lateral than the pedicle, and the trajectory of the needle is more medially directed. The approach is performed as follows:

Placing and Inflating the Bone Tamp

The bone tamp is placed (Fig. 18-18) and inflated (Fig. 18-19) as follows:

The allowable balloon pressure in cancellous bone ranges from 70 to 300 psi (the maximum allowable pressure is 300 psi). The pressure will typically increase until the bone yields, allowing the balloon to expand. As the bone shifts, the pressure in the balloon will gradually decrease.

Mixing the Cement and Filling the Void

A discussed previously, the mixture of cement to be used (CMW1 bone cement, DePuy, Blackpool, UK) is 15 mL of powder PMMA, 8 to 9 mL of liquid PMMA, and 3 mL of barium sulfate.

The factors influencing the cement hardening time included the following:

Irrespective of individual varying hardening times for the multitude of cements available, the consistency must always remain constant.

2. Injection is continued until the void filling is achieved (Fig. 18-21). It is stopped immediately if any extravasation is noted into the surrounding veins, the spinal canal, or the disc space.

Table 18.1 Sample Hardening Times for Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Formulations*

Formulation Time (min)
CMW1 original 8-9
CMW1 radiopaque 8-9
CMW2 4.5-5
CMW3 8.5-9.5

* Products listed in table are CMW, manufactured by DePuy, Blackpool, UK.

Potential adverse results

The potential adverse results of kyphoplasty are as follows:

CASE STUDY 18.1

A 52-year-old man with multiple myeloma suffered from sudden lower back pain after a traumatic injury 1 month before his outpatient clinic visit. On physical examination, severe tenderness at the L1 level was noted. His initial pain intensity was 7 to 8 on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). No neurologic abnormalities were found. Plain radiographs and a bone scan (Fig. 18-22) revealed an acute compression fracture at the L1 level. Morphine (10 mg PO bid), Celebrex (100 mg PO bid.) were prescribed, but this regimen achieved no significant pain relief.

image

Figure 18–22 Case Study 18.1: Bone scan shows increased signal at the L1 level.

A kyphoplasty using a bipedicular transpedicular approach was performed at the L1 level. Significant height restoration was noted (Fig. 18-23). The patient was discharged 2 hours after the procedure. One day after the procedure, his pain VAS score was 3 to 4.

image

Figure 18–23 Case Study 18.1: Pre-kyphoplasty (left) and post-kyphoplasty (right) images show signification restoration of vertebral height.

References

1 Masala S., Fiori R., Massari F., et al. Kyphoplasty: Indications, contraindications and technique. Radiol Med. 2005;110:97-105.

2 Spivak J.M., Johnson M.G. Percutaneous treatment of vertebral body pathology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:6-17.

3 Peh W.C.G., Gilula L.A., Peck D.D. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. Radiology. 2002;223:121-126.

4 Coumans J.V., Reinhardt M.K., Lieberman I.H. Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures: 1-year clinical outcomes from a prospective study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2003;99:44-50.

5 Dudeney S., Lieberman I.H., Reinhardt M.K., et al. Kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteolytic vertebral compression fractures as a result of multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2382-2387.

6 Garfin S.R., Yuan H.A., Reiley M.A. New technologies in spine: Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26:1511-1515.

7 Phillips F.M., Ho E., Campbell-Hupp M., et al. Early radiographic and clinical results of balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2003;28:2260-2267.

8 Theodorou D.J., Theodorou S.J., Duncan T.D., et al. Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the correction of spinal deformity in painful vertebral body compression fractures. Clin Imaging. 2002;26:1-5.

9 Lieberman I.H., Dudeney S., Reinhardt M.K., et al. Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26:1631-1638.

10 Phillips F.M., Wetzel T., Lieberman I., et al. An In vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Spine. 2002;27:2173-2179.

11 Maynard A.S., Jensen M.E., Schweickert P.A., et al. Value of bone scan imaging in predicting pain relief from percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1807-1812.

12 Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: State of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;38:155-182.

13 San Millan R.D., Burkhart K., Jean B., et al. Pathology findings with acrylic implants. Bone. 1999;23:855-905.

14 Wong W., Mathis J.M. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: Techniques for avoiding complications and pitfalls. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18:E2.