Chapter 18 Kyphoplasty
Indications
Kyphoplasty is performed in patients with recent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis, angiomas, myelomas, metastasis, and so on, who present with pain refractory to conservative treatment including bed rest and drug treatment. The best results are obtained when the vertebral collapse has occurred recently—that is 3 months or less before the patient’s presentation [1,2].
Contraindications
Contraindications to kyphoplasty may be absolute or relative [1–3]. Absolute contraindications are as follows:
Complications
There is an overall incidence rate of complications with this procedure ranges from 0 to 9.8% [4–9]. The most common is cement extravasation, which may be avoided with the following precautions [10]:


Other, extremely rare complications of kyphoplasty are as follows:
Preoperative preparation
The imaging diagnosis would include the following:


Radiologic anatomy for kyphoplasty
Radiologic landmarks for kyphoplasty should be identified as follows (Fig. 18-3)
Methods of kyphoplasty

Instrumentation
Operating Room Setup
Figure 18-5 depicts the operating room setup for balloon kyphoplasty, consisting of the following:
Kyphoplasty Kit
Figure 18-6 illustrates the components of the balloon kyphoplasty system manufactured by Medtronic, Sunnyvale, CA, use of which is described in the procedure section of this chapter:


Figure 18–9 Inflation syringe with volume scale (A) The digital pressure gauge and time shown on monitor. (B)
(Courtesy of Kyphon, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA.)
Bone Cement
Use of bone cement for kyphoplasty is associated with following potential problems:


We use a bone cement mixture (CMW1, DePuy, Blackpool, UK) that consists of the following:
Procedure
Inserting the Tools into the Fractured Vertebral Body
The single posterolateral approach should be restricted for special cases in which a transpedicular or extrapedicular approach cannot be performed. This approach could promote leakage directly back via the epidural veins to the epidural venous plexus along the anterior aspect of the spinal canal as a result of needle placement in the center of the vertebra rather than in the anterior quarter. Also, this approach carries the possibility of transecting the segmental artery or even injuring the exiting nerve root, because the needle trajectory potentially endangers the nerve root and segmental artery [14].
Please refer to the chapter 19 for the unipedicular approach from pages 266 to 267.


Placing and Inflating the Bone Tamp
The bone tamp is placed (Fig. 18-18) and inflated (Fig. 18-19) as follows:
Mixing the Cement and Filling the Void
The factors influencing the cement hardening time included the following:
Table 18.1 Sample Hardening Times for Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Formulations*
Formulation | Time (min) |
---|---|
CMW1 original | 8-9 |
CMW1 radiopaque | 8-9 |
CMW2 | 4.5-5 |
CMW3 | 8.5-9.5 |
* Products listed in table are CMW, manufactured by DePuy, Blackpool, UK.
Postoperative management
Potential adverse results
The potential adverse results of kyphoplasty are as follows:
CASE STUDY 18.1
A 52-year-old man with multiple myeloma suffered from sudden lower back pain after a traumatic injury 1 month before his outpatient clinic visit. On physical examination, severe tenderness at the L1 level was noted. His initial pain intensity was 7 to 8 on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). No neurologic abnormalities were found. Plain radiographs and a bone scan (Fig. 18-22) revealed an acute compression fracture at the L1 level. Morphine (10 mg PO bid), Celebrex (100 mg PO bid.) were prescribed, but this regimen achieved no significant pain relief.
A kyphoplasty using a bipedicular transpedicular approach was performed at the L1 level. Significant height restoration was noted (Fig. 18-23). The patient was discharged 2 hours after the procedure. One day after the procedure, his pain VAS score was 3 to 4.
1 Masala S., Fiori R., Massari F., et al. Kyphoplasty: Indications, contraindications and technique. Radiol Med. 2005;110:97-105.
2 Spivak J.M., Johnson M.G. Percutaneous treatment of vertebral body pathology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:6-17.
3 Peh W.C.G., Gilula L.A., Peck D.D. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. Radiology. 2002;223:121-126.
4 Coumans J.V., Reinhardt M.K., Lieberman I.H. Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures: 1-year clinical outcomes from a prospective study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2003;99:44-50.
5 Dudeney S., Lieberman I.H., Reinhardt M.K., et al. Kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteolytic vertebral compression fractures as a result of multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2382-2387.
6 Garfin S.R., Yuan H.A., Reiley M.A. New technologies in spine: Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26:1511-1515.
7 Phillips F.M., Ho E., Campbell-Hupp M., et al. Early radiographic and clinical results of balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2003;28:2260-2267.
8 Theodorou D.J., Theodorou S.J., Duncan T.D., et al. Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the correction of spinal deformity in painful vertebral body compression fractures. Clin Imaging. 2002;26:1-5.
9 Lieberman I.H., Dudeney S., Reinhardt M.K., et al. Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26:1631-1638.
10 Phillips F.M., Wetzel T., Lieberman I., et al. An In vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Spine. 2002;27:2173-2179.
11 Maynard A.S., Jensen M.E., Schweickert P.A., et al. Value of bone scan imaging in predicting pain relief from percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1807-1812.
12 Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: State of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;38:155-182.
13 San Millan R.D., Burkhart K., Jean B., et al. Pathology findings with acrylic implants. Bone. 1999;23:855-905.
14 Wong W., Mathis J.M. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: Techniques for avoiding complications and pitfalls. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18:E2.