Introduction to paediatric trauma

Published on 23/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1157 times

3.1 Introduction to paediatric trauma

Prevention

Over the last decades, Australia has done well in reducing the death rate from approximately 11.5 deaths per hundred thousand to about 8.5 (World Health Organization).1 However, while the death rate has been almost halved, it is still double that of some of the best OECD countries. Most developed countries have significantly reduced injury death rates. Unfortunately this is not the case in developing countries. While we have achieved much through prevention strategies, there is still more to be done.

Prevention has involved the work of legislators (seat belts, baby capsules, cycle helmets) through to educators and implementation groups such as ‘Kidsafe’. Generally the community has been supportive of the minor inconveniences that accompany improvements in child safety.

Future progress will depend on campaigns refreshing the messages, as every few years there is a new generation of young parents and it cannot be assumed that a good campaign 3 to 5 years previously will suffice. There needs to be ongoing activity. We also need to be aware that we are promoting healthy, safe activities. This does not equate to safety above all other considerations. Our children should not be sitting in front of televisions and computer games and never going outside because that is perceived as being dangerous. Rather, through appropriate research we should further identify problem areas that are key factors in the causation of road trauma, drowning, house fires, serious falls and sporting injuries. Our children should be safely riding their cycles rather than believing that cycling is unsafe. This will require much more work by all levels of community as individuals, councils and governments. We do need to take account of children’s needs for activity in homes, playgrounds, skateboard areas, walkways and cycle paths in order to plan prevention strategies.

Succinct treatment (salvage)

The advent of trauma teams and trauma systems in hospitals that receive paediatric patients has led to great improvements in paediatric injury care. It is estimated that there may have been a 20% decrease in mortality as a result of these systems. However, it is prevention that has resulted in most of the improvement in mortality.

Hospitals now have trauma teams ready to receive the child. This may occur by forward notification by the emergency management services. Trauma team activation should occur on notification when a child is at high risk of life-threatening injury according to prediction by pre-determined clinical and mechanism parameters (Table 3.1.1).

Table 3.1.1 Major trauma predictors at high risk of life-threatening injury

Clinical parameters Mechanism Glasgow Coma Score <13 High impact trauma Systolic BP <90 Fall from significant height Respiratory rate <10 or >30 Crash speed >60 kph   Ejection of child from MVA   Rollover MVA
Death of same-car occupant
Pedestrian/cyclist struck at >30 kph Injury   Penetrating injury to chest, abdomen, head, neck and groin   Significant injury to two or more body areas   Severe injury to head, neck or trunk   Two or more proximal long bone fractures   Burns of >15% or to face or airway  

MVA, motor vehicle accident.

Source: Adapted from Cameron P. 2004. Textbook of Adult Emergency Medicine, 2nd edn.

The trauma team should include a team leader, airway doctor, procedure doctor, and nursing staff from within the emergency department. Activation may involve alerting appropriate colleagues from radiology, anaesthetics, intensive care and surgical specialties according to local resources and protocols, in order to expedite emergent care. The activation process needs to be adapted to the varying local resources of the individual department, which vary between institutions.

Regular trauma meetings to review cases or videotape evaluation of resuscitation can provide education, with lessons learnt on ‘how to do things better’. As major paediatric trauma is relatively uncommon, mock paediatric resuscitation scenarios can provide the emergency department staff with an opportunity to improve preparedness. There is now a good body of international literature available to keep the trauma team up to date with the optimal care of paediatric trauma patients. The use of a trauma proforma sheet may be useful for the documentation of the assessment and resuscitation of children with major injuries (see Table 3.1.1).

Clinicians often worry about managing children with major trauma and wonder how much they should treat them as adults and how much they should take note of their differences. In adults it is well established that the A, B, C, D, E primary survey approach is the correct paradigm. In managing paediatric trauma clinicians sometimes get confused. They have a vague memory that ‘children are different’. They are not sure therefore whether to clearly follow the A, B, C, D, E or a different approach.

The best way to remember the acute management of trauma in children is to remember the a, b, c, d, e as lower case. That is, the sequence is exactly the same as in adults but there are additional nuances in children to optimise their care. However, more children suffer or die in the acute management of trauma by clinicians panicking and not following the A, B, C, D, E approach rather than doctors not being completely familiar with these nuances (see primary survey below). Delayed management of airway obstruction or inadequate fluid management are the two most common contributors to preventable paediatric deaths in trauma. Chapters 2.2 and 2.3 provide a detailed discussion of basic life support and advanced life support (ALS) techniques in children applicable in trauma.

The worst response is to panic and freeze. In this situation a child may be left un-intubated, whereas in an adult patient intubation would be performed as a reflex decision. A child with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of less than 8 should not be left with face mask oxygen; in an adult there would be rapid intubation. Similarly, intravenous lines can be difficult to insert in the shocked paediatric patient, and children may receive delayed fluid resuscitation if intraosseous access is not considered as an alternative where indicated. The supportive management of the child’s family is a further important consideration in the emergency setting.

Paediatric differences

A Airway and cervical spine control

In the setting of trauma, ‘A’ refers to securing of the child’s airway with concurrent attention to the possibility of an unstable cervical injury. The cervical spine should be immobilised using an appropriate-sized hard collar, sandbags, tape and a spinal board where appropriate. It may be helpful in an infant to place a small towel under the space in the shoulder region caused by ‘the elevation off the bed’ by the prominent occiput at this age. As discussed in the ALS section in Chapter 2.3, the characteristics of the paediatric airway make it more vulnerable to obstruction. This can be exacerbated by the necessary supine positioning of the child on the resuscitation trolley. Due to comparatively higher oxygen demands and less reserve, a child manifests hypoxic decompensation earlier than adults. This reinforces the increased importance of airway management in achieving adequate ventilation. The initial airway-opening manoeuvre in trauma patients should be by the jaw thrust technique to maintain cervical spine immobilisation. Suctioning of any oropharyngeal soiling from blood, vomit, teeth or other foreign bodies may be necessary. Adjuncts such as the placement of an oropharyngeal airway may be required. In children, these should be placed into the oral cavity directly, using gentle depression of the tongue with a spatula to allow for atraumatic positioning. Nasopharyngeal airways are not recommended due to the potential presence of cribriform plate fractures, and trauma to the turbinates may cause bleeding that may further complicate airway patency.

The indications for intubation in children with major trauma are no different than those in adults. Thus, definitive airway intervention should occur in the child who is apnoeic (usually coma related), has persistent airway obstruction despite the above manoeuvres, is requiring bag–mask ventilation to achieve oxygenation, has respiratory insufficiency from major chest injury, has significant ongoing bleeding due to facial trauma compromising the airway or has high risk of subsequent compromise such as from an airway burn.

The technique of intubation should be rapid sequence with cricoid pressure. The control of the cervical spine during intubation should occur by manual immobilisation by a dedicated assistant. The patient should have continuous monitoring, pre-oxygenation and difficult airway adjuncts available, if required. The choice and dosage of the sedation agent (thiopentone, midazolam, propofol, or fentanyl, for example) may be individualised according to factors such as the level of coma, cardiovascular status of the child and the presence of other injuries. A rapidly and short acting muscle relaxant such as suxamethonium usually provides the most optimal intubation conditions, despite the potential for transient increase in intracranial and intraocular pressures with fasciculation. Children less than 2 years of age are prone to significant bradycardia on laryngoscopy, which may be blunted by the administration of atropine, prior to intubation. Confirmation of correct ETT placement should occur according to the methods described in Chapter 2.3. One needs to be prepared for the possibility of the difficult airway or failed intubation and have a planned algorithm to deal with this possibility. It is not the failed intubation that causes the problem, but the lack of a plan of action to alternatively oxygenate the patient in this situation, whilst summoning assistance.

C Circulation and stop haemorrhage

It is important to be aware that a child may be profoundly shocked from blood loss resulting from trauma well before the occurrence of hypotension. A child responds to hypovolaemia with tachycardia and increasing peripheral vascular resistance. Therefore, the assessment of circulation status needs to be focused on the heart rate, pulse volume and the parameters of skin perfusion such as capillary refill time, colour and temperature. Perfusion inadequacy should be proactively corrected with volume resuscitation, rather than waiting for hypotension as an indicator. Hypotension occurs late due to cardiac decompensation and indicates that a child is nearing collapse. Likewise, bradycardia is often a prelude to imminent arrest. The persistence of tachycardia in the child with trauma should prompt concern and evaluation for occult ongoing blood loss.

The child with major trauma requires urgent intravenous access with the largest practical cannulae into visible or palpable peripheral veins. In the shocked child, cephalic, femoral or great saphenous veins are usually the most accessible. Where vascular cannulation is unsuccessful, after 60–90 seconds, the child who requires immediate fluids or drugs to facilitate intubation, should have a rapid intraosseous needle placed as described in Chapter 23.11. This is clearly the second line method that should be used in children without hesitation, rather than cutdown techniques that may be applicable in adults. In certain circumstances, such as the small child backed over by a motor vehicle with obvious major abdominal, pelvic or lower limb trauma, it may be prudent to use additional alternative access into a vein that drains into the SVC (e.g. external jugular or subclavian). In this rare situation, lower limb intraosseous infused volume may not access the circulation effectively due to disruption of the normal continuity of the intraosseous and intravascular spaces.

Fluid resuscitation should initially be with crystalloid or colloid titrated to clinical response. Boluses of 20 mL kg–1 should be given using pressure infusion. In the hypotensive child who arrives in extremis the early use of uncross-matched O negative blood may be indicated. Otherwise, after two boluses of crystalloid or equivalent have been infused, ongoing hypovolaemia should be with crossmatched blood replacement. Whole blood or packed cells should be given in boluses of 20 and 10 mL kg–1 respectively. Fluids should be warmed in order to reduce the incidence of hypothermic stress complicating the resuscitation. The child with ongoing cardiovascular instability needs urgent surgical intervention.

Part of the circulation phase of management includes therapy to limit ongoing blood losses from external or fracture sites by direct pressure or splinting. This is of vital importance as a child’s blood volume is only 80 mL kg–1 and small ongoing losses contribute to haemodynamic instability.

Although in major trauma the most likely cause of shock is blood loss, one needs to consider other possible contributors such as myocardial injury, pericardial tamponade, spinal shock or tension pneumothorax.

Secondary survey

The secondary survey follows when initial resuscitation has stabilised the child from immediate life threats. Continuous monitoring of vital signs and neurological status is paramount, as any deterioration should prompt immediate discontinuing of this phase of the assessment and return to the primary survey. The secondary survey should include:

Definitive care and disposition

After the secondary survey and reassessment of the child’s physiological response to resuscitation, the next step is to prioritise injuries to determine the need and timing of further imaging or any surgical intervention. The general rule is if the child remains hypotensive despite a 1/2 blood volume resuscitation over the first 1 to 4 hours, the child needs surgery. Persistent fluid and blood resuscitation can quickly cause a coagulopathic state. It may be necessary to involve multiple surgical specialists depending on the child’s injuries and the approach varies according to local resources. The team leader needs to co-ordinate these inputs so that patient care is at all times expeditious and tailored to the specific and prioritised needs of the child. In the non-paediatric tertiary environment, early liaison with appropriate colleagues from a trauma centre with the capacity for definitive care of a child with major injuries, will help determine the most appropriate means for the individual child optimally to reach definitive care. Transfer of a child to definitive care is discussed in Section 27.

Care in paediatric hospitals can result in lower rates of non-therapeutic laparotomies. The skill of the paediatric surgical trauma team is often in deciding when not to operate. Repeated examinations identify the child who is continuing to bleed and highlight the child who may have a hollow viscus injury. Patterns of injury, such as with seat-belt bruises, are often recognised and are able to be put in the context of the child’s overall physiology. The optimal care of an injured child is in a paediatric institution where there is familiarity with children and a sufficient volume of work to maintain that. The care of the child throughout the hospital stay should include other important considerations such as early physiotherapy to stop limb contractures, early involvement of the rehabilitation team and schooling.

Orthopaedic trauma

A discussion of specific injuries and their management is dealt with in detail in Section 24.

Bony injuries are common in children who have multiple trauma. Once the child is stable, the secondary survey must include assessment of all limbs, clavicles, as well as ribs, pelvis and spine. The splinting of long-bone fractures before moving the patient from the resuscitation room is important, even in the face of other serious injuries. This avoids ongoing pain and blood loss as well as further soft tissue injury to the limb.

A careful tertiary survey the following day may reveal minor bony injuries, which were not detected during the initial resuscitation phase. These injuries need to be immobilised and, if necessary, a plan made for reduction as soon as the general condition of the child allows. Once the life-threatening injuries heal, a missed displaced bony injury is a major problem for the child in the longer term.

Isolated orthopaedic trauma is one of the most common types of trauma presenting to an Emergency Department. Review of history and mechanism of injury and an overall examination are needed to exclude concurrent injury. The possibility of a non-accidental injury must always be considered. The time of last oral intake should be documented and the child should receive nothing orally until the management plan is established.

In order to avoid causing further pain to a child, much of the examination of the fracture area can be done by observation.

Pain relief involves first immobilising the limb with a sling, a temporary backslab or seating the child in a wheelchair or bed. The need for medication for pain relief can then be assessed. Analgesia is required before radiological investigation, so that any limb movement necessary to take the appropriate films is less distressing for the child.

Plaster immobilisation in the Emergency Department should generally involve using a backslab technique, rather than a circumferential plaster because of the potential for early limb swelling. The slab should be of sufficient strength to keep the fracture stable. Plaster of Paris strips usually require 12 layers for the upper limb and 20 layers for the lower limb. For displaced fractures an initial temporary plaster slab can reduce movement and therefore pain at the fracture site during the X-ray. The soft padding can be used to line the plaster slab, rather than winding it around the limb to reduce movement on application.

The reduction of any displaced fractures should be done with appropriate analgesia, anaesthesia and sedation, which should be administered by a second doctor. Often this is best achieved with a general anaesthetic where there is significant need for manipulation or fracture instability. The reduction of any fracture in children should be done by a doctor with the appropriate training and experience, so that multiple attempts and further injury are avoided. Complicated fractures and those in which the reduction will be hard to maintain require additional expertise.

Appropriate orthopaedic follow up of even minor fractures in children is vital. Within 5–7 days the swelling subsides, and the back slab does not hold the fracture, which may lose position. At that stage a circumferential plaster can usually be used. Because the child frequently falls, a change in fracture position can easily occur. A repeat X-ray at review is necessary to determine if the fracture has maintained position.