Introduction to intensive care

Published on 27/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1812 times

CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION TO INTENSIVE CARE

THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM

The care of patients in intensive care is increasingly complex, which precludes all care being provided by a single individual or team. The critically ill patient is cared for in an area where they receive optimum care and input from a number of different specialties. A major role for junior and senior medical staff in intensive care is the coordination of all aspects of patient care, and in particular the maintenance of good lines of communication between the different teams involved. Many nursing, paramedical and technical staff are involved in the care of patients in intensive care. It is important to remember that all these people have skills and experience that you do not. Do not be afraid to ask for advice. If you treat them as colleagues you will get more from them, and remember that the unit is likely to run best when everyone supports each other.

INFECTION CONTROL

Patients receiving intensive care are, to a greater or lesser extent, immunocompromised and are at greatly increased risk of hospital-acquired (nosocomial) infection. This may result directly from the underlying disease process, as a non-specific response to critical illness, or as a side-effect of a treatment. In addition, multiple vascular catheters and invasive tubes that penetrate mucosal surfaces effectively bypass host defence barriers, and increase the risk of systemic infection. While early appropriate antibiotic therapy is one of the key factors in improving the outcome from sepsis, prolonged use of broad spectrum antibiotics encourages development of resistant pathogens and overgrowth of other organisms.

In most intensive care units, there is a nominated microbiologist who is familiar with the local microbiological flora and resistance patterns of the unit, and who performs a daily round on the ICU to advise on results and antibiotic therapy. This may occur as part of the main multidisciplinary ward round, or form a separate ‘mini round’. It is vital to maintain a close and cooperative relationship with your microbiologist to help you to treat patients with sepsis in an early and effective manner, while at the same time reducing the chances of antibiotic resistant strains of organisms developing.

While patients are most at risk from their own microbiological flora, particularly those organisms associated with the gastrointestinal tract, they are also at risk from organisms transferred from other patients (cross-infection). You must therefore be scrupulous about following infection control procedures.

ASSESSING A PATIENT

Each patient in the ICU needs to be seen and assessed at least twice a day. Many conventional aspects of history taking and examination are either inappropriate or impracticable. This can seem daunting to the new trainee, particularly given the large amount of information available from charts, monitors and equipment at the patient’s bedside. It is best to develop a system for assimilating key information efficiently, so that you can assess the patient and work out a plan.

Examining the patient

Once you have put together the information available from the history and the patient’s chart, you should examine the patient carefully. Remember hand hygiene and infection control issues. (See Hand hygiene, p. 20.)

Examine the patient systematically, assimilating the information available from the monitoring into your examination findings as you go. A typical approach might be as follows:

FORMULATING AN ACTION PLAN

When you have finished assessing the patient, record your examination findings and any important results in the medical notes. Summarize your findings by making a brief list of the current problems, for example:

MEDICAL RECORDS

The nature of intensive care is such that many different individuals are involved in the care of the patient. At the same time, the patient’s condition may change rapidly, requiring frequent changes in therapy. If everyone is to keep up with the patient’s progress, accurate, contemporaneous note-keeping is essential. It is also worth bearing in mind that medico–legal cases frequently arise where patients have suffered trauma or complications from medical and surgical treatment, and that your record-keeping might therefore be scrutinized in the future.

In many units, the patient’s charts, pathology results, X-rays and prescription charts are now kept electronically or ‘on line’. Whichever system is used, you should record:

Occasionally, because of the pressure of work in the ICU, it may not be possible to make full notes at the time, for example when admitting and resuscitating a very unstable patient. It is crucial, however, that notes are written at the earliest opportunity, and the fact that they have been written retrospectively should be recorded.

TALKING TO RELATIVES

The relatives of critically ill patients may well ask to speak to a doctor about the patient’s condition, or you may ask to speak to them. Discussions with relatives should generally take place in a quiet room away from the patient’s bedside, unless the patient is awake enough to take an active part in such communications.

CONSENT TO TREATMENT IN ICU

Consent is a difficult area in the ICU. Patients have often had no opportunity to discuss intensive care treatment prior to admission. They are admitted on the presumption that they would wish to undergo life-sustaining treatments, if given the choice. The validity of obtaining consent from third parties (e.g. spouses, partners, other relatives, etc.) is questionable in this context. Nevertheless, it is often still considered normal practice to do so. In England and Wales, this position has recently been formalized in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Explanatory Notes to Mental Capacity Act 2005 Chapter 9, accessed Feb 2009 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/en/ukpgaen_20050009_en_1).

When is consent required?

Patients in the ICU will have repeated interventions performed, for example, tracheal suction, arterial and venous line insertion, and passage of tubes into various orifices. Most units would not seek specific consent for these procedures, but you should always explain to the patient, and the relatives if present, what you are going to do. For more significant invasive procedures like returning to theatre for re-laparotomy, tracheostomy, or insertion of intracranial pressure monitoring, it is usual to seek formal consent whenever possible. If the patient is obtunded but potentially able to understand the treatment being proposed, it may be appropriate to seek consent directly from the patient. If you are in any doubt, seek senior help.

Many patients requiring intensive care are unfit to give consent, that is to say, they ‘lack capacity’ as defined by the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Patients without capacity have the right for major decisions concerning their well-being (and this is includes significant medical interventions) to be referred to an ‘advocate’. In most cases, the next of kin will act as the advocate, even where this relationship is somewhat remote.

You should inform them of the nature of the proposed procedure, the anticipated benefits and likely risks. Where alternatives are available, these should also be discussed. Most hospital consent forms have a section for third party assent, and it is usual practice to obtain it. If the relatives are not present, then it is courteous and avoids conflict to obtain assent over the telephone. Such discussions should always be documented in the notes. If nothing else, this ensures relatives are kept informed and provides an opportunity for an update on the patient’s condition. Relatives do not respond well to news of the death of a patient in the operating theatre when they did not know that an operation was planned!

Where there is no clear next of kin, or where there is conflict between the perceived best interests of the patient and the wishes of the next of kin, UK law provides for an ‘independent mental capacity advocate’ (IMCA) to become involved. These are potentially complex and sensitive situations, which should be referred to your consultant who in turn may refer the matter on to the hospital medical director or other senior manager. If there is continued dispute, application may have to be made to the courts for a ruling as to the patient’s best interest.

COMMON PROBLEMS RELATING TO CONSENT

HIV testing

The ethical guidelines on HIV testing are clear. Patients should not be tested for HIV infection without informed consent, which is taken to include adequate counselling both before the test and after a positive test result. The situation in intensive care is therefore difficult, as it is unlikely that informed consent can be obtained. The decision whether or not to perform an HIV test depends therefore on the precise clinical situation.

In most cases, knowledge of the patient’s HIV status does not alter the management of an acute critical illness, and therefore an HIV test should not be performed until the patient is over the acute illness and able to give informed consent.

There are situations, however, where knowledge of the test result may alter immediate clinical management. For example, in the context of a central nervous system infection or cerebral abscess of unknown aetiology, knowledge of the patient’s immune status leads to consideration of a very different range of pathogens and may avoid the need for invasive brain biopsy. In such circumstances it may be reasonable to perform an HIV test without consent, but this can only be justified if there is likely to be direct and immediate benefit to the patient.

The social stigma surrounding HIV infection is reducing, and the benefits of long-term prophylaxis for patients, their families and partners have become well established. As the risk–benefit ratio of testing changes, it is likely that the ethical position will also change, opening the way for a more liberal stance in relation to testing in the future. At the present time, however, HIV testing remains a contentious area. Discuss matters with your consultant and, if necessary, involve the specialists in HIV or GU medicine.