Introduction to endoscopy

Published on 21/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 7679 times

CHAPTER 1 Introduction to endoscopy

1 The control handle

The control handle (Fig. 1) combines the following elements:

The control handle is intended for use with the left hand only, and combines all the necessary controls, which are ergonomically positioned. They consist of the following:

1.1 Suction and insufflation/cleaning valves

These contain joints that create a watertight seal and operate in cylinders. Suction and insufflation/cleaning occurs continuously so as to minimize delays on activation. The buttons also contain an air vent stack and, when released, return to their resting position by means of retraction springs.

1.1.2 Insufflation–cleaning

The cylinder (Fig. 2) integrates separate inlets and outlets for air and water. The inlet–outlet group that is closest to the base is the insufflation channel. The second group, which is higher up, is the lens cleaning channel.

A large water reservoir integrated into the middle section of the button separates the air and water.

The insufflation channel is open while in the resting position, but air escapes from the stack, which is larger than the insufflation tube and combines a one-way anti-insufflation valve.

When the plunger moves downwards, its base closes off the insufflation channel, and the water reservoir is moved into a position facing the cleaning channel. Inasmuch as the air pulsed by the insufflation pump cannot escape, it provides the pressure in the cleaning flask necessary to propel the water into the line.

This mechanism is either fully activated or deactivated, i.e. there is no intermediate position.

2 Main insertion tube

The insertion sheath, which is mounted on the handle, combines the following elements:

The sheath, which terminates at the bending section, contains the lens at its distal tip and is used to explore the various parts of the gastrointestinal tract. It is fairly supple for the esophagus and stomach, but far more so in the duodenum. Hence, duodenoscope sheaths exhibit differential flexibility in their distal third segments. The segment of the sheath that is in the stomach is stiff enough to prevent it from forming loops as it passes along the greater curve.

Internally, the sheath (Fig. 4) contains a spiral metal element covered with a metal plait that provides the external synthetic resin coating with support. The characteristics of the spiral determine the texture of the sheath, depending on the thickness of the metal element, and the extent to which the wound elements tend to form joints with each other. The type of metal used is also a key factor. Stainless steel is used for the upper segment, whereas bronze is used for longer colonoscopes. Alternatively, to obtain better rotational torque, two parallel coaxial spiral elements are integrated and move in opposite directions in such a way that they oppose each other.

3 Bending section

The bending section (Fig. 3), which is the continuation of the main sheath, bears a strong resemblance to an alligator’s spine. The bending section is composed of a series of circular rings that are reciprocally articulated at a 90° angle. Each ring combines hinge plates that guide the bending section cables and keep them in place. The cables, which are soldered to the distal chain, pass over the hinge plates, and when they reach the main sheath, they enter the insertion tube. The rings must be non-contiguous, so that when a cable is pulled, causing the rings to bunch up toward the sheath, they cannot pivot on their axes and abut each other. When two cables are pulled concurrently, the flexing occurs at the bisector of the angle formed by the cables. Multidirectionality is obtained by the force of these crossed impulses.

Inasmuch as the rings are non-contiguous, they are covered with a plate that prevents them from pinching the external rubber coating, which is usually glued and stitched to either end of the bending section.

This method, although more rudimentary than vulcanization, is highly advantageous, in that it allows for rapid replacement of the cladding if it shows any signs of weakness.

1.2 Electronic videoendoscopy

Summary

1 Electronic videoendoscopes

The electronic videoendoscope works like a digital camera. Its distal end combines a coupled charge device (CCD; Fig. 3). This technology allows better image transmission and storage, leading to improved diagnosis and therapy. It has a coupled charge device and a color system.

1.1 Coupled charge device (CCD)

A CCD is composed of a silicon semiconductor with an insulating oxide coating to which aluminum electrodes known as MOS (metal oxide semiconductors) are attached. MOS are photosensitive, and convert light to electricity in accordance with the brightness of the light. The atoms of the MOS photosensitive surface store an electric charge when exposed to light. The accumulated electrical charge is proportional to the intensity of the incident light.

The photosensitive surface of a CCD is divided into a large number of photodiodes. This image element is often incorrectly referred to as a pixel. However, the photodiode that captures the light is actually part of the pixel, which is also the charge transmission channel. Thus a pixel actually refers to a device’s resolution, not the number of photosensitive cells (photodiodes) it combines.

If a digital camera is said to have a resolution amounting to 6.2 million pixels, this means that the CCD comprises 3.3 photodiodes. However, this artificially widens the scope of the definition, since additional pixels are produced by means of a software process known as interpolation. Interpolation involves inserting a new pixel into an image via a calculation between a number of existing pixels. It degrades the quality of the original image, which is why it is necessary to speak in terms of photodiodes rather than pixels.

Division of the target allows each photodiode to respond independently to the amount of light reflected by the tissue.

Photodiodes are discharged during the reading process before a new charge acquisition cycle begins. The reading process is extremely rapid, but during it, the electrical charges continue to accumulate on the image that is being transmitted. These additional (thermal) charges accumulate even in the absence of light. This signal is stronger for lines that are read last, i.e. the lines at the top of the image. This results in a problem known as image smearing, which can be resolved by transferring the useful portion of the frame to an area that is shielded from the light source.

This transfer process, which occurs extremely rapidly, occurs in various ways depending on the type of CCD used.

2 Electronics and the endoscope

A video processor combines and processes information transmitted by a CCD in order to translate this information into a television image. This image is transmitted in two steps, or rather in two half-images using lines, i.e. odd-numbered lines followed by even-numbered lines. These are called interlaced images. In endoscopy, a CCD image must comprise a certain minimum number of vertical and horizontal pixels, which determine the image’s definition. Image resolution is determined by the number of pixels per image unit. Hence, image quality is determined by image definition and resolution. If the image does not contain enough pixels, it will not fill the screen. Latest generation CCDs allow for full-screen images.

2.1 Resolution

A light sensor comprises a fixed number of pixels. A lens’s resolution allows it to separate the image details. Resolution patterns make it possible to take real-time measurements in practice. The theoretical limit is reached when a pair of black and white lines is projected onto a pair of pixels.

The best videoendoscope is one whose CCD contains the most pixels, depending on the type of transfer system used. Some CCDs only use a portion of the image elements, while reserving the others for the transfer process.

Today, owing to improvements in image stability, color CCDs are gaining ground on their black and white counterparts and manufacturers are currently focusing on the following developments:

Completely digital electronic videoendoscope systems (i.e. from the endoscope to the screen) open up (a) a major field of investigation by virtue of the wealth of information that is captured by the CCD; and (b) new image processing options.

Endoscopic imaging is making major advances thanks to the migration to digital technology.

Once the pixel count, lens, and field of exploration have been improved, the range of structures amenable to examination can be expanded by greatly improving the peripheral contrast of a lesion and enhancing its relief.

Addition of a zoom function may represent a major advance, but must nonetheless be validated scientifically. The following types of zooms are currently in use:

1.3 Endoscopic accessories

Summary

1 Tissue grasping and acquisition

Gastrointestinal biopsies pose a major challenge for the endoscopist. They are undertaken using 5 mm-long forceps with spoon-shaped jaws (Fig. 1), which employ one of the following mechanical principles:

Forceps are available in different lengths and external diameters to be compatible with gastroscopes, (including pediatric instruments), colonoscopes, and enteroscopes. Biopsy specimen size appears to correlate with the forceps jaw size. A central metal spike is not mandatory and can in fact damage the endoscope operating channel.

The removal of foreign bodies requires longer, and in some cases rubberized, crocodile or rat-tooth forceps. Dormia baskets, polyp traps and ‘Roth’ nets can be used for batteries and components. It is useful to have an overtube for the extraction of foreign bodies >6 cm in length, to prevent them being dropped and inhaled on removal, and protective sheaths for the removal of sharp objects.

4 Dilatation

Dilatation (see Ch. 7.1) is performed using progressively larger bougie dilators over a rigid or semi-rigid metal guidewire or else using disposable balloons (Fig. 4A). Balloon diameters and length vary. The balloons are passed through the operating channel and dilatation is performed hydrostatically (except in cases of achalasia) under visual and/or fluoroscopic control.

5 Coagulation

Coagulation (see Ch. 1.4) can be monopolar, bipolar (Fig. 4B), or multipolar, and can be performed using dedicated probes. Coagulation is useful for tumor debulking and for hemostasis. In monopolar coagulation, a high-frequency electric current is applied to the tissue, requiring a patient grounding pad (25–40 watt (W) pulses for 7–10 s). This method is risky as the muscle layer may be coagulated and delayed perforation may occur. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is less risky, and is also more appealing by virtue of its cost-effectiveness and multifunctionality (60 W, 0.8–1.5 l/mn). The advantage of bipolar coagulation, which uses three electrodes, is that the electric current is conducted back to the electrosurgical generator (useful in the presence of a pacemaker).

Bipolar probes contain a lateral spiral filament at their distal end (10–20 W, 3–4 pulses lasting 10–14 s each). The contact must be tangential as the distal tip of the probe is perforated and has no conductor, thus allowing for cleaning. Some probes are equipped with a distal injection needle. Diathermic heater probes (Fig. 5A), which are used in some countries, comprise an internal thermocouple that generates a constant temperature of 250°C at the distal end (which has an anti-adhesive coating). This system also houses three 1-cm cleaning channels above the active distal portion (8-s 20–30 joule pulses).

6 Tissue resection

Sectioning (see Ch. 7.11) occurs using 200–500 volts HF current that generates an electric arc between the diathermy snare and the tissue. The latest generation of electrosurgical generators allows automatic stabilization of fluctuations in potential and intensity. The heat generated at the points where the electric arc comes into contact with the tissue is so high that the tissue is immediately vaporized. Following this, as the snare moves across the tissue, electric arcs are generated continuously wherever the gap between the tissue and snare is small enough, thus producing the resection.

It is useful to have a range of snares (Figs. 5B,C,D): monofilament; braided; small size (10 mm); large size (20–30 mm); asymmetric for esophageal EMR; and barbed for large colonic EMRs. Transparent caps with an edge groove (into which the loop inserts) are also essential.

7 Gastrointestinal stents

A range of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) (see Ch. 7.2) are available for use in the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, biliary tree, and colon. Most of today’s gastrointestinal prostheses are made of hardened steel (articulated components that are 2.5 cm in diameter and that do not become shorter on expansion), nitinol or Elgiloy (mesh or webbing composed of one or more wires, the length of which decreases by 30% as the prosthesis expands). The stents are straight, and may or may not have funnel-shaped or ‘dog-bone’ tips. Anchorage, extraction and antireflux valve systems are also available for these devices and some may be completely or partially membrane-covered to minimize tumor ingrowth.

1.4 Electrosurgical generators: procedures and precautions

Summary

1 Electrophysical basis of electrosurgery

In-vivo application of electric current to biological tissues creates an electrolytic effect, neuromuscular excitation, and a thermal effect.

In endoscopy, only the thermal effect is used. It is obtained via high frequency AC current exceeding 300 kHz which, unlike low frequency current (e.g. household appliances), does not cause neuromuscular excitation or cardiac rhythm disturbances.

The heat provided and the tissue effects engendered by this are determined by current intensity, specific tissue impedance and current-application time.

Sectioning, as well as the aforementioned monopolar coagulation methods, necessitates a second pole in the form of a neutral electrode, to recover the energy generated by the activated electrode or probe.

2 Problems associated with older electrosurgical generators

The power created by older electrosurgical generators is constant and does not vary with tissue and cutting surface impedance. Cutting speed and electric arc intensity are the only variable parameters with these devices. In today’s generators, electric-arc intensity is constant and controlled. Cutting speed is preadjusted in endoscopic diathermy mode without the need for any action on the part of the operator. The electrosurgical generator’s output power is regulated automatically in accordance with the contact surface. The most common unit is the ERBE ICC 200 (Fig. 3), recently replaced by the VIO 200 or 300 series.

2.2 Sectioning may inadvertently result in tissue coagulation

This can occur if too little current is applied to the target contact surface (Fig. 4). Sectioning a 1 mm2 contact surface requires a high level of current density. This same current applied to a 1 cm2 surface will be unduly low and will induce coagulation. New electrosurgical generators avoid this problem by automatically adjusting the instrument’s output current to the characteristics of the tissue being sectioned, within the limits of the maximum-current setting, which must be high enough to allow sectioning, as otherwise the tissue will be coagulated.

3 Principles of endoscopic diathermy (electrosurgery)

In endoscopic diathermy, all of the electrical settings that are applied to the section and its characteristics are automatically controlled and adjusted so as to achieve optimal cutting performance throughout the process (Fig. 5). The electrical arc’s voltage and intensity between the tissue and cutting wire are measured, analyzed and stabilized by an onboard microprocessor. Endoscopic diathermy is a fractionated process that is carried out via the following stages:

All of these parameters are regulated automatically via the device’s power.

9 Practical tips for endoscopic electrosurgery

1.5 Organizational structure of an endoscopy unit

Summary

1 Rooms

An endoscopy unit contains the following types of rooms: endoscopy rooms; disinfection rooms; storage areas for equipment and supplies; waiting areas; office areas; changing rooms; a recovery room for patients who receive general anesthesia; a recovery room for patients who receive IV sedation; and a post-intervention monitoring area. Consultation rooms and offices for the unit’s administrator and clerical staff are also indispensable. A radiology room should be provided at centers that undertake complex interventional procedures.

1.1 Endoscopy rooms

The number of endoscopy rooms should be appropriate for the number of procedures that are performed annually. These rooms should be equipped for upper and low GI tract procedures, as well as for endoscopic ultrasound.

1.1.2 Endoscopy room equipment

The center of the room (Fig. 2) should contain a 60 cm wide trolley that can be oriented in any direction necessary and that has removable side-restraints. This trolley should be placed at a distance from the examination table so as to prevent patients from tampering with it.

1.3 Cleaning room

The disinfecting room (Fig. 4) should be a separate, self-enclosed space that communicates with each endoscopy room via a technical window, or preferably a door that opens automatically. This room is used to clean and disinfect endoscopes. Medical supplies should not be sterilized in the disinfecting room. This should be done in a central sterilization facility that is used for the operating rooms, if the endoscopy unit is part of a hospital. Cleaning and disinfecting rooms for medical equipment must comply with legal regulations pertaining to design, methodology, and personnel training.

There should be one or more work surfaces for non-sterile items. Each surface should be cushioned and covered with a material that is not traumatic for endoscopes. There should be 4–6 cleaning sinks of adjustable height in which the endoscopes can be immersed in water. Each basin must have its own tap and drain.

The use of gluteraldehyde is illegal in many countries, as are other aldehyde disinfectants. In some countries it is mandatory to establish a wastewater disposal contract with the municipal authorities in charge of sewage treatment. A separate circuit can be established that allows wastewater to be channeled into a tank if necessary.

In most countries, manual disinfection has been replaced by the use of automated endoscope reprocessors (AERs), but the steps of manual cleaning are described here. There must be separate washing and rinsing basins for each stage of the washing process. A hot and cold water mixer tap must be available for one or two of the basins. In some countries, it is law that the basins used for disinfectant and for the final rinse should contain a 0.22 µm microbiological filter that is autoclaved daily and changed regularly in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (after every 40–60 autoclave cycles). Basins used for detergent and disinfectant should be equipped with lids.

The microbiological and physical quality of the tap water used must meet the criteria of local health and safety regulations or infection control policies. However, in both treatment and disinfection rooms, so-called ‘water for standard medical treatment’ is sufficient if the quality of the water used by the unit is under active management. If not, so-called ‘bacteriologically managed’ water is to be used for the final rinse, as is done in washer-disinfectors.

Basins used for detergent and disinfectant should have a suction connection at the height of the basin and an extraction hood with an absorbent filter. The air recirculation system must have separate extraction and fresh air pipes. The fresh-air intake element should be located more than 8 meters away from the air extraction outlet element, and the air in the room should be exchanged at a rate of more than 10 volumes per hour. The room must be depressurized at all times. Endoscopes must be transported in covered plastic containers that are color coded: one color for contaminated endoscopes (e.g. red) and a second color for clean ones (e.g. green). These containers must be disinfected in a basin that is used for this purpose only.

1.3.1 Additional work surfaces should be provided

The number of dedicated work surfaces for manual disinfection must be appropriate for the number of endoscopy rooms in the unit. These surfaces may be replaced by washer-disinfectors that do not dispense with the initial manual washing and rinsing phase and for which two dedicated basins are provided, i.e. one for washing and one for rinsing. If the endoscopy unit has only one washer-disinfector, it is essential to provide a work surface with four to six basins as back-up, in case the machine breaks down.

If washing and disinfecting are automated, at least one washer-disinfector should be provided for each endoscopy room. The type of machine should be specified for each room (i.e. synchronous or asynchronous machine; a washer-disinfector that can process one endoscope at a time, or two endoscopes at a time, in accordance with the type of activity in the room). Latest generation machines are ‘pass-though’, i.e. endoscopes that are contaminated are placed in the washers in one room and are removed from the opposite side in an adjacent clean room.

1.4 Endoscope storage room

The endoscope storage room (Fig. 5) must be separate from the disinfecting room and should contain vented cabinets to store endoscopes, endoscope accessories, and small implements. Endoscopes should be stored vertically. The utility of cabinets with high efficiency particulate air filtration (HEPA) systems, and their location, have yet to be clearly established but they may allow clean endoscopes to be stored for up to 72 hours without the need for reprocessing prior to use.

3 Medical and paramedical personnel

Conclusion

The manner in which new endoscopy units should be organized is anything but a futuristic vision. It is in fact highly pragmatic, and is based on the principle of unit autonomy (dedicated sites that are configured for the performance of gastrointestinal endoscopy, via resource sharing in settings where other types of endoscopy are carried out), so as to ensure that the unit is able to manage, follow-up and monitor patients in connection with all diagnostic and therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures, and in such a way that patients receive competent, safe and comfortable care.

Box 1 The main requirements for the organizational structure of an endoscopy unit

The following requirements must be met in order for a gastrointestinal endoscopy unit to function properly.

1.6 Gastrointestinal endoscopy training

Summary

1 Principles of certification and re-certification

General principles have been developed by societies which document the minimum requirements for certification or re-certification of an individual. These are listed in Box 1. A minimum number of procedures are still required for general endoscopy (Table 1). A key change in assessing the adequacy of an individual’s training is that competence is not solely based on completing a minimum number of procedures, but should also involve direct observation and successful completion of objective criteria. Several societies now require a formal summative assessment prior to certification. Guidelines have also been developed to certify non-physicians performing endoscopy in countries where there are too few endoscopists.

Table 1 Guidelines for minimum numbers of general endoscopy procedures required for certification

Procedure Number of supervised procedures
USA France
EGD 130 300
Flexible sigmoidoscopy/proctoscopy 30 100
Colonoscopy 140 100
Esophageal dilation 20 10
PEG 15 Not stated
Esophageal stent placement 10 10
Pneumatic dilation for achalasia 5 Not Stated
Tumor ablation 20 10
Advanced endoscopy Not applicable 100a
Non-variceal hemostasis 25 (including 10 active bleeders) 30
Variceal hemostasis 20 (including 5 active bleeders)
Polypectomy 30 50
Abdominal ultrasound Not applicable 300
pH and manometry See Box 3 50

a This includes laser, APC, dilation, and stent insertion.

Advanced endoscopic training is usually obtained and additional training and competence assessed and credentialed separately (Box 2). Ideally, a formal training program should be completed. Animal models and short courses are useful adjuncts but cannot replace formal training.

For re-certification, physicians must document evidence of ongoing training and an adequate case load to maintain endoscopic skills. In addition to adequate numbers of procedures, the success, ability to perform therapeutic interventions and complication rate should be assessed (Table 2). Continuing medical education and continuous quality improvement are also key components of re-certification.

Table 2 Recommended numbers of interventional procedures

Procedure Number of supervised procedures
USA France
EUS 75 150
Mucosal Lesions
Submucosal abnormalities 40  
Pancreaticobiliary 75
EUS-guided FNA:
Nonpancreatic
Pancreatic
25
25
ERCP 200
With at least an 80% cannulation rate
150
Laparoscopy 25 50

The ASGE recommend a minimum of 125 supervised cases for competence of mucosal and submucosal abnormalities, with a minimum of 150 supervised cases, of which 75 are pancreaticobiliary and 50 EUS-FNA for comprehensive competence.

2 Endoscopic training using models

Several models exist which allow trainees to improve their manual skills and dexterity. In addition, it allows a trainee to practice invasive procedures such as polypectomy, hemostasis and endoscopic mucosal resection. It is important to understand that although models allow a trainee to hone their skills in a safe environment, they do not replace formal training.

2.4 Erlangen active simulator for interventional endoscopy (EASIE)

EASIE uses resected stomachs of adult pigs which have been washed, and frozen (Figs 14). The stomachs are fastened to a board at six points, with the distal end of the esophagus attached to a tube that simulates the gastrointestinal tract. ERCP training can also be performed, in which case the stomach-duodenum-liver is preserved to allow for access to the bile ducts via the papilla. Current EASIE models include: hemostasis; polypectomy; APC; dilation; stent placement and ERCP. Endotrainer uses the same models, with some improvements.

Further Reading

Aabakken L, Adamsen S, Kruse A, et al. Performance of colonoscopy simulator: experience from a hands-on endoscopy course. Endoscopy. 2000;32:911-913.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association Institute, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The gastroenterology core curriculum. Third edition. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2012-2018.

ASGE. Guidelines for certification and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:811-814.

ASGE. Guidelines for certification and granting privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:679-682.

ASGE. Guidelines for training in endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:829-833.

Bar-Meir S. A new endoscopic simulator. Endoscopy. 2000;32:898-900.

British Society of Gastroenterology. Non-medical endoscopist. A report of the working party of the British Society of Gastroenterology. www.bsg.org.uk.

Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:780-783.

Faigel DO, Baron TH, Adler DG, et al. ASGE. Guidelines for certification and granting privileges for capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:503-505.

Greff M, Mignon M. Europe and initial and continuing medical education in hepato-gastroenterology. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1996;20(2):13-15.

Hochberger J, Maiss J, Hahn EG. The use of simulators for training in GI endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2002;34:727-729.

Hochberger J, Maiss J, Magdeburg B, et al. Training simulators and education in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current status and perspectives in 2001. Endoscopy. 2001;33:541-549.

Ikenberry SO, Anderson MA, Banerjee S, et al. ASGE. Endoscopy by nonphysicians. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(4):767-770.

2004 JAG: Guidelines for the training, appraisal and assessment of trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. www.thejag.org.uk, 2004.

Neumann M, Hochberger J, Felzmann T, et al. Part 1. The Erlanger endotrainer. Endoscopy. 2001;33:887-890.

1.7 Endoscopy nurses

Summary

1 Sphere of responsibility

Endoscopy nurses play a critical role in the provision of safe, high quality endoscopy. They provide nursing care in accordance with doctors’ instructions, which includes supporting disease prevention, health education, training, and management.

As much of what endoscopy nurses do centers around the technical aspects of endoscopy, they must have the ability to:

1.8 Patient information

Summary

Patient information

Provision of high quality patient information is a key element of successful endoscopic practice. Written patient information leaflets (PIL) help patients recall information discussed during a clinic consultation, allow them to understand their intended procedure, and to contemplate any questions requiring clarification before the procedure is performed.

Endoscopy centers should have printed leaflets available for all major diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that they undertake. While many useful generic PILs are available from national and international endoscopy societies, patient support groups and websites, these should be considered a starting point for development of locally adapted leaflets that relate specifically to the endoscopy center’s activities.

PILs should be procedure-specific, developed by the endoscopy team, agreed by the hospital and preferably, should involve patient groups in their development. They should be clear and easy to read, avoiding technical jargon, and seeking the views of patient representative groups can be helpful in this regard. Leaflets should include a section on frequently asked questions (FAQs), deal with common issues (e.g. diabetes, anticoagulation, and the possible need for antibiotics). If appropriate, PILs should be available in locally prevalent, community languages for those from ethnic minorities. If this is not possible, a reliable and readily available language interpretation service is essential for these patients. The needs of disabled patients (e.g. visually impaired) should also be considered and leaflets should be available in large type or Braille.

PILs should be structured and the broad headings listed in Box 1 provide a useful framework for their development.

Most national endoscopy societies have downloadable PILs for common procedures on their websites and some of these are listed below. Boxes 2 and 3 give examples of patient leaflets for colonoscopy and ERCP, which may serve as a useful guide.

Box 2 Colonoscopy Information

Your appointment details, information and consent form

Please bring this booklet with you.

An appointment for your Colonoscopy has been arranged at:

Hospital name: ___________________________________________

Date: ___________________________________________________

Telephone number: _______________________________________

Endoscopist/Consultant: ___________________________________

Please telephone the Endoscopy Department on the above number. If this is not convenient, or you would like to discuss any aspect of the procedure before your appointment.

Box 3

ERCP Informationa

Your appointment details, information and consent form

Please bring this booklet with you.

An appointment for your ERCP has been arranged at:

Hospital name: ___________________________________________

Date: ___________________________________________________

Telephone number: _______________________________________

Endoscopist/Consultant: ___________________________________

Please telephone the Endoscopy Department on the above number if this is not convenient or you would like to discuss any aspect of the procedure before your appointment.

aReproduced with permission, courtesy of Dr Richard Tighe, Norfolk and Norwich Hospital, UK.

1.9 Medicolegal aspects of endoscopy

Summary

Introduction

Gastrointestinal endoscopy has become increasingly complex and interventional in recent years, and as a procedural specialty, is inherently associated with an element of risk. While the vast majority of endoscopic procedures are undertaken safely and successfully, there is always the potential for harm, and endoscopists may face medicolegal consequences as a result. Much of this risk, however, relates not to specific aspects of endoscopy but to good medical practice and while it is beyond the scope of this brief chapter to discuss good medical practice in depth, it is worth emphasizing some key elements:

2 Complications

Many years ago, the commonest complications arising from endoscopy were sedation-related events, but better sedation practice has made these uncommon nowadays. Large audits suggest that both immediate and delayed complications are perhaps more common than realized, but have also highlighted the fact that many complications are preventable and that delayed recognition is associated with worse patient outcomes and a greater likelihood of litigation. Specific procedure-related complications will, however, inevitably occur from time to time, when undertaking invasive procedures, and these are discussed in detail in Chapter 8.

The best strategy for dealing with endoscopy-related complications is therefore to prevent them, and the following measures may assist this:

3 Consent for endoscopic procedures

Personal autonomy is a fundamental human right and failure to obtain informed, valid consent breaches this, and may lead to litigation for assault or battery. Consent is a patient’s agreement to treatment and is a process that begins during the initial consultation with the patient, and ends with the completion of treatment. In order for consent to be ‘valid’, patients must be adequately informed (i.e. have been given sufficient information about the procedure, its benefits, risks, and alternatives). Patients must be mentally competent to decide, must give their consent freely and without duress, and retain the right to refuse or withdraw consent at any time. In some countries, it is a legal requirement that all endoscopic procedures require written consent, but this is not universal; but note that a patient simply attending for a procedure does not imply that consent has been given.

3.1 Patient information

This is discussed in Chapter 1.8 and should include as much information as is reasonable to allow patients to make an informed decision. It must be easy to understand, and patients must have adequate time to read and contemplate the information before making their decision. It is generally not acceptable for patients to be presented with information and/or a consent form for signature immediately prior to the proposed procedure. Knowing how much information to provide to patients without causing undue concern is not easy, but a description of the procedure, alternatives, the need for sedation and potential risks is essential. All common complications (occurring with a frequency of 1% or more) should be discussed, as should rare complications, if they are potentially serious or fatal, or may lead to long-term disability (e.g. perforation, pancreatitis). The principle is that serious complications, no matter how rare, might influence a patient’s decision to proceed, and therefore needs to be discussed beforehand.

1.10 Cleaning, disinfection, sterilization, and storage of endoscopy equipment

Summary

1 Definitions of terms

2 Disinfection phases for immersible flexible endoscopes

In view of the current (but unquantified and non-confirmed) risk of variant Creutzfeldt Jacob Disease (vCJD) transmission during an endoscopic procedure, in France it is recommended that endoscopes be cleaned twice. This is not mandated in all countries. At all times, every step of the cleaning process must be monitored.

2.6 Disinfection (basin 3)

This phase is efficient only if the cleaning before is well done.

In most countries, manual disinfection is now unacceptable and the use of automated endoscope reprocessing machines (AER) is required. For countries where AERs are not mandatory or widely available, the process for manual cleaning is described below but this practice will have the desired effect only if the previous two phases were carried out properly, and is strongly discouraged.

This operation is composed of the following steps:

3 Endoscope disinfection using AERs

Two types of AER are available:

The manufacture and use of AERs must comply with ISO 15883. The use of ‘pass-through’ machines is recommended in several countries (see Ch. 1.5) but this has major implications for the design and layout of endoscopy units.

Today’s AERs perform cycles composed of two cleaning phases.

The use of such machines requires a preliminary phase that must be performed immediately following the use of the endoscope and that comprises the following steps:

This phase is carried out in water with an enzymatic detergent but containing no disinfectant. The endoscope should be soaked for as long as necessary for swabbing. Place the endoscope in the AER ensuring that all connectors are correctly secured. Start the machine immediately after you place the endoscope in it.

4 Cleaning procedure for accessories

5 The ideal endoscopy unit

5.1 Endoscope cleaning room equipment and layout

The equipment and layout of this room (see also Ch. 1.5) must be specifically intended for the cleaning and maintenance of medical devices. It should designed in accordance with the ‘forward movement’ principle, i.e. equipment flow is one-way from dirty to clean.

The room must meet the following criteria:

5.2 Personnel

Each patient is a potential source of infection and endoscopy unit staff should take the following precautions:

Box 3 Good practice for endoscope disinfection – 16 key elements

1.11 Gastrointestinal biopsies and histology

Summary

Introduction

The editors would like to acknowledge Brigitte Marchetti.

Endoscopic biopsies are an indispensable diagnostic tool, allowing histological, immunological and microbiological studies, as well as tissue culture. Biopsy specimens should include the full depth of the mucosa and if possible the submucosa, particularly in settings involving screening for inflammatory disease (granulomas) or vascular disease (amyloid deposits, vasculitis, lymphangiectasia). Several high quality biopsies should be taken to avoid the creation of artifacts due to erosion, epithelial hemorrhaging, and cytoplasmic vacuolization.

Low-grade dysplasia involves the following cellular changes:

High-grade dysplasia demonstrates the following changes:

A microinvasive malignancy exists if the lesion breaches the muscularis mucosae. When an endoscopic mucosal resection has been performed, the submucosa should be examined to ensure that it has not been infiltrated. Box 1 documents the criteria for careful monitoring versus surgical referral in patients in whom the muscularis mucosa has been breached.

2 Processing of biopsy samples

3 Histology of the GI tract

3.1 The esophagus

The esophagus consists of the mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis propria (Fig. 1). The mucosa contains non-keratinized stratified squamous epithelium, lamina propria, and muscularis mucosae. The submucosa contains small aciniform cells that secret mucins and connective fibers (papillas), which extend far into the mucosa. The muscularis propria consists of striated muscle in the upper third, both striated and smooth muscle in the middle, and smooth muscle in the lower third. The esophagus contains no serous membrane.

3.1.2 Barrett’s esophagus

Four quadrant biopsies should be taken every 2 cm from the Barrett’s mucosa. Advanced imaging techniques (Figs 2, 3) can be used to screen for Barrett’s esophagus (see Chs 6.1 and 6.2). The gastroesophageal junction can be visualized using confocal endomicroscopy (Fig. 2), as can Barrett’s esophagus (Fig. 3B) and dysplasia (Fig. 3C), which correlate with the pathological findings (Fig. 3A). Biopsies should be submitted to pathology in separate containers to permit focusing of subsequent biopsies, should dysplasia be detected. Depending on whether high-grade, low-grade or no dysplasia is found, this determines management and endoscopic screening intervals (for screening intervals for Barrett’s esophagus, see Ch. 3).

3.2 The stomach

The cardia is a 5–30 mm area composed of individual or interlinked cardiac glands, which contain identical mucus secreting cells. The fundus (Fig. 4A,B) contains two regions. The first is delineated by furrows containing vessels with thick mucosa. Its crypts are round and regular and are surrounded by a vascular web (Fig. 4D), with numerous narrow, rectangular glands, which are perpendicular to the surface. The second region is composed of mucus and parietal cells. The body of the fundic gland is mainly composed of parietal cells, but also contains larger cells that are rich in pepsin or zymogens. The antrum (Fig. 4C) contains a thinner mucosa that is 200–1000 µm thick. Its epithelium is more irregular than the fundus. The antrum’s crypts are elongated and contain smaller glands that are mainly composed of mucus cells that occur around primary or secondary crypts. Cells producing gastrin and serotonin are also found here.

3.2.1 Helicobacter pylori infection

This initially provokes acute gastritis, accompanied by a polynuclear infiltration, followed by chronic gastritis accompanied by a lympho-plasmocyte infiltration (Fig. 5), which provokes lymphoid follicles. The latter occurs mainly in the antrum, but also extends to the fundus. An endoscopic examination may reveal mini- or macro-nodules that constitute submucosal lymphoid nodules. Micro-ulceration can be seen with zoom magnification (Fig. 6). Helicobacter pylori infection is initially accompanied by elevated acid secretion, which induces chronic duodenitis, which in turn is associated with gastric metaplasia and colonization by bacteria. Chronic Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with atrophy, which can be associated with reduced acid secretion and should be investigated during screening for intestinal metaplasia (Fig. 7).

Helicobacter pylori is detected via direct examination, culture, or a urease test (CLO test). Culture is considered the gold standard, and allows assessment of antibiotic sensitivity. CAG A+ strains tend to activate inflammatory cells. Specimens should be collected from the antrum (2 cm around the pylorus) and fundus, in accordance with the Sydney classification system (two antral and two fundic specimens). Helicobacter pylori distribution is heterogeneous in the stomach, but predominates in the antrum.

3.2.2 Linitis plastica

In cases of gastric linitis plastica (Fig. 8), where there is invasion of the gastric wall by small signet-ring cells, biopsies sometimes yield false negative results and have to be repeated. Endoscopic ultrasound should be used where doubt exists.

3.3 Duodenum and jejunum

The duodenum and jejunum contain villi, which are covered with absorbent cells (enterocytes with microvillous, brush border) as well as a very small number of goblet cells, with crypts of Lieberkühn between the villi.

Duodenal biopsies should be performed in cases of anemia secondary to iron or folic acid deficiency (or any other nutritional deficiency), chronic diarrhea accompanied by exudative enteropathy or malabsorption, particularly for the diagnosis or monitoring of celiac disease. Duodenal biopsies are also recommended in cases of suspected amebiasis, strongyloidoses, or bacterial overgrowth. Immunohistochemical staining should be performed on biopsies in patients in whom lymphoma is suspected.

3.4 Rectum, colon, and ileum

The ileal mucosa is composed of long villi that are identical to those in the jejunum; goblet cells outnumber absorbent cells by a ratio of 5 : 1 (Fig. 10).

The colonic mucosa, which is mainly composed of goblet, absorbant and endocrine cells, and varies in thickness from 500–1000 µm (owing to the absence of Paneth cells) (Figs 1113). Small numbers of intraepithelial lymphocytes (<5% of the epithelial cells) are observed in normal colic mucosa. The basal membrane is <5 µm thick, and the crypts (1700/cm2), are rectangular, and terminate with parallel intestinal glands. The goblet cells are more numerous in the upper part of the gland. Endocrine cells occur in the lower segment. The lamina propria is composed of fibroblasts, smooth mucosal fibers, macrophages, capillaries and small lymphocytes containing a few lymphoid follicles. The muscularis mucosae is 20–40 µm thick, and the submucosa is composed of loose connective tissue that is rich in arterioles and mini-veins and contains the Meissner plexus. The terminal vascularization is web-like and contains glandular crypts. Peri-cryptic micro-arches are more numerous in the caecum than in the sigmoid colon, whereas colonic mucosa thickness varies inversely.

3.4.1 Benign polyps

Benign polyps include hyperplasic, inflammatory, and juvenile hamartomatous polyps.

Box 4 Hereditary polyposis syndromes

3.4.2 Neoplastic polyps

There are several types of adenoma:

DALM (dysplasia associated lesion or mass), has a different genetic basis from adenomatous polyps. DALM occur in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis/Crohn’s disease) and are associated with a high risk of colorectal cancer.

Guidelines on who to screen are available in Chapter 4.