Inotropic Therapy

Published on 26/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 26/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1801 times

92 Inotropic Therapy

image Rationale for Using Inotropic Therapy in the Critically Ill

On can consider two objectives for inotropic therapy in the critically ill: (1) to restore an adequate cardiac output through an improvement in cardiac function in patients with low blood flow related to reduced myocardial contractility and (2) to achieve supranormal cardiac output values to prevent or reduce complications in some high-risk situations; in this setting, inotropes could be given after volume resuscitation, even in patients with normal myocardial contractility.

Use of Inotropes for Reversing Impaired Myocardial Contractility

The first category of situations where inotropic therapy is generally considered includes cardiogenic shock, acute heart failure, or acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure. However, although the use of such therapy in these clinical conditions seems logical on a purely pathophysiologic basis, no demonstration of a beneficial impact on morbidity and mortality can be found in the literature. Moreover, almost all the commercially available inotropes have been shown to be associated with increased mortality rates when given on a long-term basis to patients with chronic heart failure. It has been postulated that the long-term use of inotropes may lead to deterioration of left ventricular function through acceleration of myocardial cell apoptosis.1 Additionally, the beneficial effects on mortality of agents known to have negative inotropic effects, such as β-blockers, is now well established in patients with chronic heart failure.2,3 Therefore, inotropic therapy is generally reserved for patients with cardiogenic shock or for patients with advanced heart failure whose condition is refractory to standard therapy including diuretics, digoxin, β-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Under these conditions, clinicians can expect short-term positive effects of intravenous (IV) inotropic therapy, allowing cardiovascular stabilization. In patients with refractory heart failure who are candidates for cardiac transplantation, this therapy can be used as a bridge to transplantation. In those with potentially reversible causes of acute heart failure (such as myocardial infarction or acute myocarditis), short-term inotropic therapy must be considered as an appropriate bridge to coronary revascularization or recovery. The development of bedside echocardiography in the intensive care unit (ICU) should allow appropriate use of inotropic therapy, since this method provides a more accurate assessment of systolic cardiac function than traditional invasive methods like pulmonary artery catheterization.

Use of Inotropes for Achieving Supranormal Levels of Oxygen Delivery

High-Risk Surgical Patients

The concept of attempting to achieve supranormal hemodynamic endpoints emerged from studies in high-risk surgical patients. In a prospective study in high-risk patients undergoing surgery, Shoemaker et al. showed that the use of supranormal hemodynamic values as therapeutic endpoints was associated with a reduction in mortality from 33% to 4%.4 In the protocol group, dobutamine and dopamine were given as inotropic drugs—even in the absence of evidence of reduced cardiac contractility—when volume resuscitation (and packed red blood cells if necessary) failed to achieve supranormal values of myocardial oxygen delivery (DO2)4 (DO2 > 600 mL/min/m2). In other randomized studies performed in high-risk patients undergoing surgery, the deliberate perioperative increase in DO2 above supranormal values using fluid infusion and various inotropic drugs (dobutamine, dopamine, epinephrine, dopexamine) were associated with decreased mortality and postoperative complications.5 It remains unclear, however, whether the benefits were related to the increased DO2 per se or to other antiinflammatory effects of catecholamines.6 The issue of drug dose is also essential. A recent meta-analysis has suggested that in the setting of major surgery, dopexamine at low doses but not at high doses could improve outcome.7 From all these findings, it is reasonable to consider the increase of cardiac output and DO2 towards supranormal values during the perioperative period in high-risk patients undergoing elective major surgery.

Critically Ill Patients

Whether this therapeutic approach could also be applied to patients admitted to the ICU for established acute illnesses has been a matter of debate. On the one hand, a pathologic myocardial oxygen consumption/oxygen delivery (VO2/DO2) dependency, presumably due to impaired oxygen extraction capabilities, has been reported in various categories of acute illnesses such as sepsis8 and acute respiratory distress syndrome.9 Such a phenomenon was reported to correlate with the presence of increased blood lactate, a marker of global tissue hypoxia,8 and to be associated with a poor outcome.10 This so-called pathologic oxygen consumption/supply dependency would incite the clinician to increase DO2 towards supranormal values to overpass its critical level. However, such an aggressive therapeutic approach has been seriously questioned since the publication of randomized clinical trials performed in patients with acute illnesses that did not demonstrate any benefit from deliberate manipulation of hemodynamic variables toward values higher than physiologic values.11,12 In one of these studies, the mortality rate was even higher in the group of patients assigned to receive an aggressive treatment aimed at achieving supranormal values of DO2.11 It was postulated that deleterious consequences of the use of high doses of dobutamine in patients of the protocol group were responsible for the increased mortality. It has to be noted that (1) the patients of the protocol group received high doses of the inotropic agent despite the absence of evidence for an altered contractility, and (2) in most of these patients, the aggressive inotropic support failed to achieve the target value of VO2 (170 mL/min/m2). The analysis of the subgroup of septic patients of this study showed that the survivors were characterized by ability to increase both DO2 and VO2 regardless of their group of randomization.13 The non-survivors were characterized by an inability to increase their VO2 despite the increase in DO2, suggesting a more marked impairment of peripheral oxygen extraction in non-survivors than in survivors.13 In addition, the ability to increase cardiac output and DO2 was also significantly reduced in non-survivors in comparison with survivors, suggesting a decrease in cardiac reserve in those patients who will die.13 This is not a surprising finding, since the degree of myocardial dysfunction in septic shock correlates with increased risk of death. In this regard, it has been suggested that the response to a dobutamine challenge could have a prognostic value in septic patients. Indeed, in two prospective studies, survivors were able to increase both VO2 and DO2 in response to dobutamine, while non-survivors were unable to increase either DO2 or VO2 or both.14,15

From all the results of randomized controlled studies, the deliberative attempt to achieve supranormal hemodynamic targets in the general population of critically ill patients is no longer recommended.16,17 However, in the early phase of septic shock when blood flow and DO2 are generally low, an aggressive hemodynamic therapy including inotropes, aimed at rapidly normalizing DO2, was demonstrated to result in a better outcome in a randomized control trial.18 Thus, in the early phase of septic shock and maybe in other acute illnesses, it could be essential to rapidly restore normal global blood flow to avoid further deleterious consequences of systemic hypoperfusion. In later stages of the disease, with inflammatory processes and organ dysfunction already developed, no evidence of benefit from a further increase in DO2 has been shown. However, it seems likely that cardiac output should be kept in the normal range by using volume and/or inotropes to prevent worsening of the insult.

image Pharmacologic Properties of Inotropic Agents

Different inotropic drugs are available. Some of them act on adrenergic receptors located at the surface of cardiomyocytes; others exert their effects within the myocardial cell.

Adrenergic Signaling

Natural as well as synthetic catecholamines enhance the Ca2+ cytosolic amount, which is directly related to the force of contraction (Figure 92-1). Ca2+ fixes on the troponin C Ca2+-specific binding site, inducing a conformational change that leads to the fixation of the myosin head to the actin filament. Hydrolysis of the adenosine monophosphate (ATP) molecule located on the myosin head to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) simultaneously induces the flexion of the myosin neck and the shortening of the contractile apparatus.

A rapid overview of the physiologic response to adrenergic-receptor stimulation is essential to understand the pharmacologic properties of these drugs. Receptors of the adrenergic system are classed as α1, α2, β1, β2, and dopaminergic receptors. Activation of the β1 receptors, and to a lesser degree the α1 receptors, is responsible for the inotropic effect of adrenergic agents.

β1-Adrenergic Receptors

β-Adrenergic receptors are transmembrane proteins located in the sarcolemma. The β1 receptor subtype is mainly represented in the human heart. Its stimulation induces inotropic, lusitropic, chronotropic, and dromotropic effects, and all these effects result from the enhancement in Ca2+ cytosolic concentration. Binding of a β1-agonist agent to its receptor stimulates the Gs protein. The guanosine diphosphate, normally fixed to the stimulatory αs subunit of Gs protein, is replaced by guanosine triphosphate, and the αs-guanosine triphosphate complex binds to adenylcyclase, which then becomes activated. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is formed from ATP and activates protein kinase A. Protein kinase phosphorylates and activates several cellular structures as follows:

The increase in intracytosolic Ca2+ concentration also leads to the activation of calmodulin. This ubiquitous protein enables the phosphorylation of other proteins once it has fixed Ca2+:

Indeed, relaxation is dependent on Ca2+ reuptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum through the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase pump. The activity of sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase is normally inhibited by the phospholamban located in the sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane near the Ca2+ pump. Phosphorylation of phospholamban relieves this inhibition, and Ca2+ uptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum is thus stimulated.

Pharmacologic Properties of the Inotropic Agents Used in Clinical Practice

Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors

Despite the major role of catecholamines in the management of critically ill patients with inadequate cardiac output, problems such as tachycardia, arrhythmias, increased myocardial VO2, excessive vasoconstriction, or loss of effectiveness with prolonged exposure to β-agonists may occur. Thus, other inotropic drugs such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors (milrinone and enoximone) have been proposed for the management of myocardial dysfunction. These synthetic drugs inhibit the peak III isoform of phosphodiesterase, which catalyses cAMP (see Figure 92-1). By increasing intracellular cAMP concentration, they induce a potent vasodilation of arterial and venous systems through relaxation of vascular smooth muscle. The left ventricular preload is reduced to a greater extent than with dobutamine. At the cardiac level, phosphodiesterase inhibitors induce an inotropic effect similar to that induced by dobutamine. The heart rate is increased only at high rates of administration. The resulting effect is an increase in cardiac output. Because the enhancement of cAMP intracellular concentration also promotes the reuptake of Ca2+ by the sarcoplasmic reticulum, phosphodiesterase inhibitors facilitate ventricular relaxation. Finally, since β-agonists exert their action by increasing the production of cAMP, phosphodiesterase inhibition could enhance their adrenergic effects. This is the pharmacologic basis for the synergic association of β-agonists and phosphodiesterase inhibitors.

Calcium Sensitizers

Calcium sensitizers increase the sensitivity of troponin C for Ca2+ and hence the force and duration of the cardiomyocytes’ contraction (see Figure 92-1). To date, levosimendan is the only calcium sensitizer approved for clinical use. The advantage of levosimendan over classical inotropes would be to increase the force of contraction without enhancing the influx of Ca2+ into the cytosol and thus without increasing the risk of arrhythmias related to this ionic alteration. Some degree of phosphodiesterase III inhibitory activity probably also contributes to the inotropic effect of these drugs. It also induces vasodilation by opening ATP-dependent K+ channels.19

Cardiac Myosin Activators

Cardiac myosin activators belong to a new class of inotropes. They increase the activity of the ATPase of the myofibrils, increasing the contractile force of the cardiomyocytes without increasing the amount of ATP molecules required for contraction—that is, without increasing the myocardial VO2.20 Additionally, these substances increase the cardiac contractile force without the potentially deleterious increase in intracytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration. Cardiac myosin activators have been tested in animal studies in which their inotropic properties have been well demonstrated. Pharmacologic studies in humans are ongoing.


Istaroxime is a new drug that inhibits the Na+/K+-ATPase, increasing the activity of the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase pump. It induces some inotropic and lusitropic effects.21 In animals, istaroxime was demonstrated to decrease the end-diastolic volume of the left ventricle and to increase the left ventricular ejection fraction. In patients with decompensated heart failure without hypotension, istaroxime decreased the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and improved the diastolic function of the left ventricle.22 This drug is still under clinical evaluation.