Infectious Endocarditis

Published on 26/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1480 times

138 Infectious Endocarditis

Infectious endocarditis (IE) is a rare disease with an incidence of 3 to 10 episodes per 100,000 person-years, varying between countries and increasing dramatically with age. It is presently classified by mode of acquisition (healthcare-associated IE [nosocomial and non-nosocomial], community acquired, and IE in intravenous drug users [IVDU]), by localization as left- or right-sided prosthetic or native valve IE, or as device related (e.g., pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator). The new classification of healthcare-associated infectious endocarditis (HAIE) includes patients hospitalized for more than 48 hours before symptoms of IE develop (previously called nosocomial IE [NIE]) or patients with symptoms less than 48 hours after admission but with extensive healthcare contact defined as: (1) home-based nursing or IV therapy, hemodialysis, or IV chemotherapy fewer than 30 days before onset of IE symptoms, (2) hospitalization fewer than 90 days before onset of IE, or (3) residency in a nursing home or a long-term care facility. The definition of HAIE applies both to native (NVE) and prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). Early prosthetic valve endocarditis (now defined as presenting <1 year post surgery) has a portion included in the HAIE definition.1

HAIE was estimated to have occured in 0.8 of 10,000 hospital admissions and is often diagnosed late during hospitalization (39 ± 25 days).2 When compared with the 2.5 million cases (at least) of nosocomial infections occurring per year in the United States, the overall incidence of HAIE seems low,2 but the associated morbidity and high mortality renders HAIE of great importance for the clinician. The current in-hospital mortality rate for patients with IE is 15% to 20%, with 1-year mortality approaching 40%.3

image Healthcare-Associated Native Valve Endocarditis

During the past decade, 14% to 25% of all cases of IE have been considered nosocomial. It is, however, expected that the incidence will increase in the future because of (1) an increase in the incidence of nosocomial bacteremia, (2) improvement in survival of immunocompromised patients, (3) the steady increase in the number of ICU beds admitting seriously ill patients worldwide, and (4) the improved survival rate of elderly patients in whom degenerative heart disease and/or prosthetic valves are more frequently encountered.2 The current understanding of HAIE has been based primarily on retrospective studies with small sample size. New data emerged from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS) from 61 medical centers in 28 countries.4 From this database, as defined by the modified Duke criteria, native valve IE in patients without IV drug abuse was recognized in 1622 patients. Of these patients, 1065 had community-acquired infection, and 557 (34%) had healthcare-associated native valve endocarditis (HANVE), consistent with the contemporary high incidence of healthcare-associated infection.5 Almost half of these infections were acquired outside of the hospital, a result consistent with previous reports of healthcare-associated bacteremia. Compared with patients with community-acquired IE, patients with HANVE more often have comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus, cancer, or long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Fever is the most common presenting feature, but physical signs of IE present more rarely in HANVE, suggesting a more acute course. Non-nosocomial acquisition of HANVE is most often dependent on hemodialysis or an intravascular catheter (54%), while patients with nosocomial acquisition more often have preexisting valvular disease or undergo a non-dental invasive medical procedure. The mitral valve is most frequently involved, followed by the tricuspid and aortic valve.4

Staphylococci (both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative strains) represent the major pathogens in HAIE. S. aureus is responsible for 52% to 57% of HAIE episodes, 91% of which have an intravascular device as the most probable source of bacteremia.2 In the ICE-PCS study, S. aureus was the most common pathogen in HANVE, among which 47% was methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA).4 The second most common bacteria was enterococci (15%), followed by coagulase-negative strains of staphylococci (13%). MRSA is more prevalent in hospital-acquired infections (57% versus 41% of HANVE acquired outside the hospital).4 Among coagulase-negative strains of staphylococci, Staphylococcus lugdunensis deserves attention because it behaves like S. aureus with high virulence, has a 50% probability of complicated infection when isolated in blood, and an aggressive course when it is the cause of IE.6

Gram-negative bacilli are rare causes of HANVE despite the fact that they cause lethal bacteremias in hospitals, probably as a result of their decreased ability to adhere to heart valves and susceptibility to bactericidal action of serum.2,7 Fungal infectious endocarditis is a rare infection, comprising in total less than 10% of IE cases, with a mortality rate ranging from 36% to 50%. However, increased frequency of fungal endocarditis has been observed in recent years, attributed to the increasing use of vascular lines, as well as to noncardiac surgery and increased numbers of immunocompromised patients.8 The fungi most commonly associated with endocarditis are Candida albicans, non-albicans species of Candida, Aspergillus spp., and Histoplasma capsulatum. In the past decade, the incidence of Candida parapsilosis HAIE has increased and is attributed to (1) frequent colonization by this organism of the skin and subungual area, (2) ability of the pathogen to proliferate in glucose-containing solutions (hyperalimentation), (3) ability of the organism to adhere to synthetic material because of slime production, and (4) contamination of intravascular pressure monitoring devices.2

In contradistinction to Candida spp., in which blood cultures in cases of IE are positive in 83% to 95% of cases, blood cultures are positive in only 11% or less of patients with Aspergillus spp. In cases of Curvularia, Penicillium, and Phycomyces infection, blood cultures are usually 100% negative. In cases in which Coccidioides immitis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Rhodotorula, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are involved, blood cultures are usually positive if properly collected.2,8

In cases of fungal endocarditis, prolonged symptoms before hospitalization and embolization of major arteries are classic findings. However, diagnosis is delayed or missed in 82% of patients.8,9 For fungal endocarditis to be diagnosed early, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis and echocardiography performed, which then demonstrates large, bulky vegetations. Peripheral blood cultures should be obtained and accessible embolic specimens subjected to histologic examination.9,10

HANVE has higher mortality compared to community-acquired IE (25% versus 13%). In HANVE, factors recognized to be independently associated with increased risk of death are increased age (>60), diabetes, S. aureus infection, paravalvular abscess, stroke, heart failure, and new conduction abnormality. Cardiac surgery during the IE episode is found to be associated with lower mortality.4 Therefore, in addition to appropriate antimicrobial therapy, early surgical intervention is often mandatory. In fungal endocarditis, removal of the infected valve is indicated, followed by postsurgical prophylaxis with oral azoles for 2 or more years and prolonged surveillance to detect relapses.9,10

Special consideration should be given to chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients, in whom IE is significantly more common (16-18 times) and causes greater morbidity and mortality. In this group of patients, IE is the second leading cause of death after cardiovascular disease, and it has been proposed to be added as a fifth category in classification by acquisition.11,12 In the ICE-PCS study, 63% of HANVE were HD patients.4 S. aureus was the pathogen in 75% to 80% of cases, half of which were MRSA. Fever may not be present, and blood cultures may less often be positive, complicating diagnosis by the Duke criteria. Mortality remains high: 30% during the first month, about 65% during the first year, and reaching more than 70% if cardiac surgery is indicated. Age older than 65, diabetes as the cause of renal failure, mitral involvement, large vegetations, septic emboli, and infections due to MRSA or VRE have been identified as risk factors for mortality.11

For methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), antistaphylococcal penicillins should be the treatment of choice, whereas in cases of MRSA with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) over 1 mg/L to vancomycin, antimicrobial choices include daptomycin and linezolid.1 If vancomycin is indicated, drug levels should be followed, with trough levels of 25 to 30 mg/L required for efficacy.13

image Healthcare-Associated Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis

PVE accounts for 9.5% to 20% of all cases of IE, with mortality rates ranging between 25% and 60%.14 It is a distinct and important form of IE because more than 100,000 artificial heart valves are implanted annually in the United States, and eradicating infection on foreign material is a major therapeutic challenge which as a rule necessitates their surgical removal.14

It has been reported that “early” PVE (within 1 year of implantation) is found less often with porcine than mechanical valves, whereas it is almost absent from homografts. However, studies with long-term follow-up have suggested that no significant differences exist in the incidence of PVE related to the valve type.14 As noted, PVE has been classified as early or late, with the former occurring within 12 months of implantation.1 Contamination of prosthetic valves during this early period occurs either directly at the time of implantation by a break in sterile surgical techniques or via transient episodes of bacteremia, emanating mostly from infected intravascular catheters and wound or skin infections while the patient is still hospitalized, therefore representing a real nosocomial infection.14 In the early postoperative period, the sewn ring and the valve annulus are not yet endothelialized and are therefore a site of thrombus formation and a target for adherence of bacteria. Transient bacteremia can seed these thrombi and incite infection, leading to the formation of large vegetations that may cause functional obstruction or incompetence. As the infection advances, abscesses, fistulas, and progressive annular destruction may further complicate the underlying process, causing conduction blocks, mycotic aortic aneurysms, and even purulent pericarditis.14

PVE may manifest as an indolent illness with low-grade fever and immune-mediated manifestations or as a fulminant acute febrile disease with hypotension. When early PVE is caused by S. aureus, the clinical picture is accompanied in more than 40% of cases by central nervous system (CNS) and intracardiac complications and a subsequent mortality ranging from 42% to 85%.15 The microbiology of PVE is shown in Table 138-1. In the ICE-PCS study, 556 definite cases of PVE were found among 2670 cases of IE (20%), with 36.5% being healthcare-associated prosthetic valve endocarditis (HAPVE) and 70% acquired in the hospital.16 Of the cases of PVE, 71% were diagnosed during the first year post surgery and the majority after day 60 (median on day 84). In 43% of HAPVE, an intravascular device was in place. S. aureus was the most common pathogen in PVE, with higher incidence in cases with HAPVE (34% and 13.3% MRSA), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci.16

Recent progress in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), by applying a high-resolution biplane or multiplane transducer, has enhanced the diagnostic approach to PVE. Studies have demonstrated that the sensitivity of TEE in the diagnosis of PVE ranges from 90% to 100% versus 40% to 63% with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).17,18

The Duke criteria have been used effectively to diagnose PVE, particularly when TEE is used to supplement non-diagnostic TTE.1

Mortality in PVE is still substantial, being higher in early PVE (77%) than in late-onset infection (42%). The leading causes of death in early PVE are septic shock (36%), congestive heart failure (29%), and renal failure (21%).2,19,20 In the ICE-PCS study, overall mortality for PVE was 22.8%, with the mortality from HAPVE being higher at 30.5%. Other factors related to increased risk of death were older age, S. aureus as the pathogen, and complications such as heart failure, stroke, intracardiac abscess, and persistent bacteremia.16 The survival rate with medical therapy alone in cases of moderate to severe chronic cardiac failure due to prosthesis dysfunction is almost nil. However, valve replacement in this group plus antimicrobial therapy will achieve a survival rate of 44% to 64%.21 It is noteworthy that PVE recurs in only 6% to 15% of patients who are operated on with active bacterial invasive infection. After surgery for removal of the infected prosthetic valve, antibiotics should be continued for at least 6 weeks.14

image Infective Endocarditis in the ICU

Few studies have focused on IE acquired or admitted in the ICU. The most recent studies to report on ICU-IE are those of Mourvillier et al.22 and Saydain et al.23 Confirming the high morbidity and mortality rates for this subset of patients requiring ICU admission, Mourvillier et al. reported 228 patients admitted to the ICU with IE. In that study, 36% of patients had PVE, with S. aureus as the predominant pathogen. The overall mortality was 45%, and factors strongly associated with outcome included septic shock, cerebral emboli, immunocompromised state, and cardiac surgery. Most complications occurred early during the course of IE. Surgical treatment appeared to improve in-hospital outcome.22 Saydain et al. reported 33 patients with IVDU-IE requiring admission in the ICU because of severe sepsis or septic shock (36%), respiratory failure (33%), or neurologic deterioration (18%). S. aureus was found in 94% of cases, while 15% were polymicrobial. Of the patients, 45% had septic emboli. In-hospital mortality was 27%, and the risk of death increased with a history of previous IE and a high APACHE II score.23 Gouëllo and associates24 examined 4416 ICU hospitalized patients during a 6-year period (1992-1997) and described 22 patients with ICU-IE defined by the Duke criteria, among which 16 were acquired in the ICU. The prevalence was 5 cases per 1000 admissions. The time elapsed between admission in the ICU and subsequent diagnosis for ICU-IE was generally quite prolonged (range, 11 to 100 days; mean, 39 ± 25 days). In 21 of the 22 cases, IE was the consequence of bacteremia related to a medical or surgical procedure; S. aureus was the causal organism for IE in 77% of patients, and P. aeruginosa, Streptococcus spp., and Candida spp. were also isolated. All patients were febrile. In only 9 of the 22 patients was a new murmur found, whereas in 2 and 1, respectively, embolic events and cardiac failure were observed.24

The expected classic clinical features of IE are often not present in ICU patients. For instance, central nervous system (CNS) signs due to sedation may be blunted, and manifestations of renal failure are usually attributed to septic multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.

Because the risk of HAIE is proportionally increased with the duration of hospitalization, the diagnosis of IE should always be suspected in the presence of fever of unknown origin with positive blood cultures after a prolonged stay in the ICU. The latter suspicion is strengthened in patients with prosthetic valves, in those undergoing procedures that may damage the right side of the heart, and whenever bacteremia lasts for more than 72 hours after catheter removal and/or positive blood cultures persist 3 days after starting appropriate antimicrobials.25

In several studies, the diagnostic value of echocardiography in the diagnosis of IE and particularly of the transesophageal view has been pointed out.17 In case of a negative TEE, if clinical suspicion is high, a second examination has been advocated.1 It should be noted that TEE provides an advantageous acoustic window in mechanically ventilated patients in comparison to TTE, where visualization may be poor. Significant complications such as bronchospasm, hypoxemia, angina pectoris, pharyngeal bleeding, vomiting, and hematemesis have been reported in fewer than 4% of ventilated patients subjected to TEE.26

HAIE in the ICU requires prompt initiation of antimicrobial therapy and cardiosurgical evaluation, keeping in mind that mortality increases sharply with S. aureus as a pathogen, with age, and with the origin of the infection (i.e., ICU-acquired versus community acquired). Of note, treatment duration of catheter-related staphylococcal (S. aureus) bacteremia aiming to treat successfully any seeded valve—as occurs in 23% of the cases—should never be shorter than 2 weeks, and echocardiography should be performed before treatment discontinuation. Otherwise, a treatment duration of 4 weeks has been recommended.27

Prophylaxis of HAIE, especially in ICU patients, mandates (1) IV access and intravascular procedures to be performed with aseptic care, (2) IV and intraarterial catheters to remain in place for as brief a duration as possible, and (3) tunnelization, although a controversial issue, to be considered either as an immediate approach for temporary dialysis catheters or as a systemic procedure if the catheter has been or will be in place for more than 4 days.28 Antimicrobial prophylaxis is not justified before performing TEE.1

Key Points

Annotated References

Task Force on the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2369-2413.

Comprehensive review gathering all recent evidence-based knowledge and guidelines (for Europe) about diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of IE.

Giamarellou H. Nosocomial cardiac infections. J Hosp Infect. 2002;50:91-105.

This comprehensive review of nosocomial infectious endocarditis includes risk factors, microbiology, types of infection, diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis.

Benito N, Miró JM, de Lazzari E, et al. Health care–associated native valve endocarditis: importance of non-nosocomial acquisition. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:586-594.

Contemporary data about HAIE from the biggest multinational database on infectious endocarditis.

Wang A, Athan E, Pappas EA, et al. Contemporary clinical profile and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA. 2007;297:1354-1361.

The most recent data about PVE from the biggest multinational database in infectious endocarditis.

Nucifora G, Badano LP, Viale P, et al. Infective endocarditis in chronic haemodialysis patients: an increasing clinical challenge. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2307-2312.

The most common HAIE acquired outside hospitals merits special attention because of some unique characteristics.

Mourvillier B, Trouillet JL, Timsit JF, et al. Infective endocarditis in the intensive care unit: clinical spectrum and prognostic factors in 228 consecutive patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:2046-2052.

Large retrospective study revealing the profile and prognosis of IE patients admitted to the ICU.

Saydain G, Singh J, Dalal B, et al. Outcome of patients with injection drug use–associated endocarditis admitted to an intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2010;25:248-253.

A small but unique retrospective series of IE in IVDU patients admitted to an ICU.

Gouëllo JP, Asfar P, Brenet O, et al. Nosocomial endocarditis in the intensive care unit: an analysis of 22 cases. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:377-381.

A prospective cohort study of clinical features, microbiology, diagnosis, and outcome of infectious endocarditis acquired in an ICU. Retrospective analysis of ICU patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis, including prognostic factors and treatment outcome.

References

1 The Task Force on the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2369-2413.

2 Giamarellou H. Nosocomial cardiac infections. J Hosp Infect. 2002;50:91-105.

3 Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, et al. Clinical Presentation, Etiology, and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis in the 21st Century. for The International Collaboration on Endocarditis–Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:463-473.

4 Benito N, Miró JM, de Lazzari E, et al. Health care–associated native valve endocarditis: Importance of non-nosocomial acquisition. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:586-594.

5 Shorr AF, Tabak YP, Killian AD, et al. Healthcare-associated bloodstream infection: A distinct entity? Insights from a large U.S. database. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2588-2595.

6 Zinkernagel AS, Zinkernagel MS, Elzi MV, et al. Significance of Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia: Report of 28 cases and review of the literature. Infection. 2008;36:314-321.

7 Morpeth S, Murdoch D, Cabell CH, et alInternational Collaboration on Endocarditis Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS) Investigators. Non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:829-835.

8 Ellis ME, All-Abdely H, Sandridge A, et al. Fungal endocarditis: Evidence in World literature, 1965-1995. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:50-62.

9 Falcone M, Barzaghi N, Carosi G, et al. Candida infective endocarditis: Report of 15 cases from a prospective multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2009;88:160-168.

10 Talarmin JP, Boutoille D, Tattevin P, et al. Candida endocarditis: role of new antifungal agents. Mycoses. 2008;52:60-66.

11 Nucifora G, Badano LP, Viale P, et al. Infective endocarditis in chronic haemodialysis patients: an increasing clinical challenge. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2307-2312.

12 Chrissoheris MP, Libertin C, Ali R, et al. Endocarditis complicating central venous catheter bloodstream infections: A unique form of health care associated endocarditis. Clin Cardiol. 2009;32:E48-E54.

13 Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: A consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82-98.

14 Karchmer AW. Infections of prosthetic valves and intravascular devices. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and Practice of Infectious Disease. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000:903-913.

15 Wolff M, Witchitz S, Chastang C, et al. Prosthetic valve endocarditis in the ICU: prognostic factors of overall survival in a series of 122 cases and consequences for treatment decision. Chest. 1995;108:688-694.

16 Wang A, Athan E, Pappas EA, et al. Contemporary clinical profile and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA. 2007;297:1354-1361.

17 Sachdev M, Peterson GE, Jollis JG. Imaging techniques for diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2002;16:319-337.

18 Evangelista A, Gonzalez-Alujas MT. Echocardiography in infective endocarditis. Heart. 2004;90:614-617.

19 Nadji G, Rémadi JP, Coviaux F, et al. Comparison of clinical and morphological characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis with endocarditis caused by other pathogens. Heart. 2005;91:932-937.

20 Fernandez Guerrero ML, Goyenechea A, Verdejo C, et al. Enterococcal endocarditis on native and prosthetic valves. A review of clinical and prognostic factors with emphasis on hospital-acquired infections as a major determinant of outcome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007;86:363-377.

21 Lalani T, Cabell CH, Benjamin DK, et al. Analysis of the impact of early surgery on in-hospital mortality of native valve endocarditis. for the International Collaboration on Endocarditis–Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS). Circulation. 2010;121:1005-1013.

22 Mourvillier B, Trouillet JL, Timsit JF, et al. Infective endocarditis in the intensive care unit: clinical spectrum and prognostic factors in 228 consecutive patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:2046-2052.

23 Saydain G, Singh J, Dalal B, et al. Outcome of patients with injection drug use–associated endocarditis admitted to an intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2010;25:248-253.

24 Gouëllo JP, Asfar P, Brenet O, et al. Nosocomial endocarditis in the intensive care unit: an analysis of 22 cases. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:377-382.

25 Hill EE, Vanderschueren S, Verhaegen J, et al. Risk factors for infective endocarditis and outcome of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(10):1165-1169.

26 Slama MA, Novara A, Van De Putte P, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic implications of transesophageal echocardiography in medical ICU patients with unexplained shock, hypoxemia, or suspected endocarditis. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:916-922.

27 Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1-45.

28 Marschall J, Mermel LA, Classen D, et al. Strategies to prevent central line–associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:S22-S30.