Infection and inflammation

Published on 27/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 27/05/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1187 times

CHAPTER 13 INFECTION AND INFLAMMATION

DEFINITIONS

The common definitions for sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) were established in the early 1990s in a consensus statement from the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Although these definitions are of limited value clinically, they have been used as a means to standardize many clinical trials and have become a standard, internationally recognized nomenclature. These definitions are as follows:

DISTINGUISHING INFECTION

In view of the similarities in the clinical picture produced by SIRS and sepsis (above), the problem may arise as how to distinguish infection. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a commonly used marker of infection but is not specific. Procalcitonin is an alternative marker that is thought to be more specific for infection, but is not yet widely available.

In general, infection is only confirmed when a positive microscopy or culture result is obtained from a normally sterile body space. Repeated samples are often required. (See investigation of unexplained sepsis, p. 334.) The time taken to obtain microbiological results varies with the particular sample type and the technique used to process it. Techniques for confirming infection, and potentially identifying the causative organism, include:

SEPSIS CARE BUNDLES

Recent international consensus guidelines on the management of sepsis in critical care have been widely adopted (Table 13.1).

TABLE 13.1 Guidelines for initial treatment of sepsis. Adapted from surviving sepsis campaign1

Initial resuscitation Resuscitation goals
Begin resuscitation immediately in patients with hypotension or elevated serum lactate >4 mmol/L, do not delay pending ICU admission CVP 8–12 mm Hg
Mean arterial pressure > 65 mmHg
Urine output >0.5 mL kg−1 h−1
Central venous (SVC) oxygen saturation > 70% or mixed venous > 65%
Diagnosis
Obtain appropriate cultures before starting antibiotics provided this does not significantly delay antimicrobial administration
Obtain two or more blood cultures (BC)
One or more BCs should be percutaneous
One BC from each vascular access device in place > 48 h
Culture other sites as clinically indicated
Perform imaging studies promptly to confirm any source of infection
Antibiotic therapy
Begin intravenous antibiotics as early as possible and always within the first hour of recognizing severe sepsis and septic shock
Use broad-spectrum antibiotics, one or more agents active against likely pathogens and with good penetration into presumed site of infection
Reassess antimicrobial regimen daily to optimize efficacy, prevent resistance, avoid toxicity, and minimize costs
Duration of therapy typically limited to 7–10 days; longer if response is slow or there are undrainable foci of infection or immunological deficiencies
Stop antimicrobial therapy if cause is found to be non-infectious
Source identification and control
A specific anatomic site of infection should be established as rapidly as possible and within first 6 h of presentation (see below).
Formally evaluate patient for a focus of infection amenable to source control measures, e.g. abscess drainage, tissue debridement
Implement source control measures as soon as possible following successful initial resuscitation (exception: infected pancreatic necrosis, where evidence suggests that surgical intervention is best delayed)
Choose source control measure with maximum efficacy and minimal physiologic upset
Remove intravascular access devices if potentially infected

1 Dellinger RP et al. 2008 Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 36: 296–327 [published correction appears in Crit Care Med 36: 1394–1396].

While much of the evidence is low level (based on expert opinion), the recommendations also include some high level evidence, the document as a whole forms a rational and coherent approach to the management of the patient with sepsis. Central to these sepsis care bundles is the need for early effective resuscitation, early effective antibiotic therapy and source control, and where possible, the use of an appropriate ‘biological response modifier’. Currently, activated protein C, (drotrecogin alpha), is the only such agent available (see Septic shock below). The key recommendations are summarized in Table 13.1.

SEPTIC SHOCK

The clinical features are those of SIRS, with significant hypotension and end-organ dysfunction (see above). Initially patients may have a hyperdynamic circulation, with an elevated cardiac output (CO) and reduced systemic vascular resistance (so-called ‘warm septic shock’). At this stage patients exhibit warm peripheries, flushing and visible cardiac pulsation. This may rapidly progress, however, to ‘cold septic shock’ with reduced CO and cold, poorly perfused peripheries. This is frequently accompanied by marked metabolic acidosis.

The first imperatives are resuscitation and stabilization. This is followed by investigation of the underlying source of sepsis. The third stage involves management of specific underlying problems and complications.