Indigestion (chronic epigastric pain or meal-related discomfort)

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3188 times

6 Indigestion (chronic epigastric pain or meal-related discomfort)

Case

A 39-year-old female psychologist consults because of problems with indigestion for the past year. She states that after eating a meal she feels very uncomfortable and full. The discomfort she experiences is not at the level of pain, but does interfere with her life. She also feels bloated and is unable to finish normal-sized meals now. She has these symptoms after most meals. She very occasionally will have heartburn (retrosternal burning discomfort in her chest travelling up towards the throat). She never has acid regurgitation and denies dysphagia. She is slightly nauseous at times, but denies vomiting. She has not noticed any change in her bowel habit. Her weight has fluctuated up and down, but overall has been stable. She remembers her mother suffered for years with indigestion problems. She is not taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs supplied ‘over the counter’.

She has already consulted a gastroenterologist who performed an upper endoscopy; she was told the test was normal (no peptic ulcer, no cancer and no reflux oesophagitis), but was given a trial of proton pump inhibitor for 2 months. It did not help her.

Physical examination is unremarkable. You order a Helicobacter pylori 13C urea breath test, which comes back negative. In view of the previously negative upper endoscopy and characteristic history, you diagnose functional or non-ulcer dyspepsia (postprandial distress syndrome based on the Rome III criteria). You provide the patient with dietary advice (low fat and small regular meals) and prescribe a prokinetic agent (domperidone, 10 mg before meals). The patient returns a month later and advises you that she has had a good response to this approach. You further reassure her about the benign nature of the condition although you do warn her that while the symptoms can fluctuate they usually persist long term.

Mechanisms Underlying Epigastric Pain

A diverse range of physiological or pathological mechanisms can result in chronic or recurrent epigastric pain. These include (1) inflammation, not only acute, but also chronic; (2) abnormal motor activity producing distension or excessive contraction of hollow organs; (3) hypersensitivity of hollow viscera in the upper gastrointestinal tract; (4) stretching of the capsules of solid viscera, for example the liver; (5) malignant invasion of nerves; and (6) organ-specific responses, such as acid and pepsin acting on nerve fibres in the base of a peptic ulcer. Based on the afferent relays or pathways for pain impulses, activated by these processes, three different types of pain can be appreciated clinically. These types can occur in isolation or together in the one individual. Visceral pain arises from nociceptors situated in the walls of the abdominal viscera, somatic pain from nociceptors situated in the parietal peritoneum and supporting tissues, and referred pain by activation of strong visceral impulses spilling over to the somatic afferent neurones in the same spinal cord segment (Ch 4). Visceral pain tends to be dull, perceived in the midline and poorly localised; it may be described in terms other than ‘pain’, and may be accompanied by symptoms of autonomic disturbance. Somatic pain, like referred pain, tends to be sharp or aching, sustained, lateralised and yet relatively poorly localised; it may be worse on movement. Referred pain tends to be sharp or aching in character, lateral or bilateral and roughly localised to the somatic dermatome. When patients describe pain as superficial, it may arise from lesions in the abdominal wall or hernial sac, but may occasionally also represent referred pain, from disease in intraabdominal or thoracic viscera.

Clinical Assessment

Epigastric pain, which is considered to represent a sense of tissue damage, should be distinguished from discomfort; the latter refers to a subjective, negative feeling that does not reach the qualification or intensity level of pain. Discomfort can include a number of other symptoms including early satiation (inability to finish a normal-sized meal), postprandial fullness and nausea (Ch 9). It is useful to determine the major complaint: whether the symptoms are related to meal ingestion or not, and whether they are intermittent (recurrent or cyclical) or continuous. As with any symptom, the other specific features need to be ascertained, including the site, mode of onset, intensity, character, and precipitating and relieving factors (see Ch 7). For the purposes of this discussion, a duration of 3 months or longer is taken as indicating chronicity, which distinguishes dyspepsia from the acute symptoms present in disorders such as perforated peptic ulcer, acute cholecystitis and acute pancreatitis (Ch 4).

Differential diagnosis of dyspepsia

The differential diagnosis of dyspepsia is extremely wide, including diseases not only of the gastroduodenum, but also all of the other organs situated in the upper abdomen. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the precise symptoms. Leading questions are often required to elicit the complaints that trouble the patient most. Even when a detailed history has been obtained, the exact clinical diagnosis is often difficult—symptoms such as nocturnal waking, or relief or aggravation by eating often fail to discriminate between the different diagnoses. Patients with dyspepsia can, however, be subdivided into two main categories, based on the known or proposed underlying pathophysiology (Table 6.1). Thus dyspeptic symptoms may be ascribed to:

Table 6.1 Differential diagnosis of epigastric pain or meal-related epigastric discomfort

Organic Functional dyspepsia

Chronic Peptic Ulcer

Patients with an uncomplicated peptic ulcer classically describe intermittent symptoms of ‘burning’ or ‘gnawing’ epigastric pain, which they may locate by finger point; the pain tends to be worse before meals and is relieved by taking food or antacids. Epigastric pain may waken the patient at night, commonly at about 2.00 a.m., when it is again relieved by food or antacids. The diagnosis is further strengthened if the history is clearly episodic with symptoms present for a few months at a time, followed by periods of remission (periodicity). The intensity and duration of pain vary from recurrence to recurrence, and the symptom-free intervals vary unpredictably. A history of prompt and good symptomatic relief by a course of H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors suggests an acid-related disorder (either peptic ulcer or reflux). There may be associated symptoms of heartburn and occasional vomiting. It is usually not possible to differentiate between gastric and duodenal ulceration by symptoms alone; in gastric ulcer, however, pain relief associated with food may be short-lived and anorexia, nausea and weight loss are more prominent. Unfortunately, classical ulcer-type symptoms also do not discriminate peptic ulcer disease from functional dyspepsia.

Chronic peptic ulcer, in most cases, is caused by H. pylori infection (Ch 5) or NSAIDs; an acid hypersecretory state (e.g. the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome due to a gastrin-producing tumour) is a rare but important cause to be aware of in practice.

Gastric cancer

A short history of new onset dyspepsia occurring in a patient over the age of 55 years should raise the suspicion of gastric cancer (Ch 17). Symptoms of pain or discomfort on a daily basis, together with early satiety, increase the probability. Weight loss, anorexia and vomiting are common symptoms, especially when the malignancy is advanced (hence not curable)—these are the alarm features or red flag symptoms. Dysphagia can occur with tumours arising from the cardia or distal oesophagus.

Cholelithiasis

‘Biliary colic’ is associated with the sudden onset of severe or very severe epigastric pain that may pass through or around to the back (Ch 4). Typically there are episodes of pain that occur unpredictably, usually with associated nausea and vomiting. With inflammation of the gall bladder, the pain may shift to the right upper quadrant and become ‘peritoneal’ in type. With biliary colic, movement does not aggravate the pain. The pain is usually not ‘colicky’ but sustained, albeit varying in intensity. Symptoms may be induced by a fatty meal. In the absence of typical biliary pain there appears to be no association between the presence of gallstones in the gall bladder and dyspepsia. If a gallstone enters the common bile duct (choledocholithiasis), there may be associated features of intermittent jaundice, dark urine, pale stools, or with sepsis episodic fever and rigors (see Ch 23).

Management of Dyspepsia

A careful history is important to document the symptoms; in particular gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and biliary disease can in most cases be readily suspected from the history and relevant further investigations and treatment undertaken. Otherwise, if there are no symptoms or signs to indicate a higher probability of organic disease, and the patient is under 55 years of age and is not taking regular aspirin or other NSAIDs, then immediate investigation is not warranted (Fig 6.1).

Empiric therapy

Depending on the age of the patient, and the duration and severity of symptoms, reassurance regarding the low probability of serious disease, and a full explanation of the mechanisms currently believed to underlie the symptoms may be associated with an improvement in symptoms. A short-term empiric trial of a proton pump inhibitor (or an H2-blocker) for 4–8 weeks is the current standard of care, but patients must be followed up. An alternative approach is to test for H. pylori infection (e.g. a urea breath test) and treat positive cases with specific antibiotic therapy (Ch 5). In late middle-age and elderly patients, the threshold for investigation should be much lower, as organic diseases occur more frequently in this age group.

When to investigate further

If symptoms are not fully relieved after 8 weeks of empiric drug treatment, investigation of the upper gastrointestinal tract, preferably by endoscopy, is advisable. The aim of endoscopy is to definitely exclude peptic ulcer, reflux oesophagitis, and malignancy. Endoscopy is superior to the double-contrast barium meal and is now considered the ‘gold standard’ because it allows direct visualisation and biopsy of the oesophagus, stomach and duodenum. Ideally, endoscopy should be performed during a symptomatic phase when the patient is not on potent antisecretory drugs, to help ensure an active ulcer is not missed. All gastric ulcers should be biopsied to exclude gastric cancer (unless there is a strong contraindication, such as active bleeding, use of anticoagulants or known portal hypertension). H. pylori can be accurately detected by histological examination of gastric mucosal biopsies, or by subjecting such biopsies to rapid urease testing.

Screening blood tests, such as full blood count and blood film for anaemia, and biochemical testing for glucose intolerance and abnormal liver function are recommended, although these tests generally have a low yield. Urea and electrolyte estimation should be performed in patients with persistent vomiting, as uraemia may present with dyspepsia and vomiting. Hypercalcaemia, usually due to hyperparathyroidism, is an uncommon cause of nausea but may be associated with duodenal ulcer. Serum amylase or lipase levels are usually not helpful in chronic pancreatitis except following an acute exacerbation. Upper abdominal ultrasonography in the absence of symptoms or biochemical test results suggestive of biliary tract or pancreatic disease is not recommended as a routine screening test because outpatient studies have shown that most dyspeptic patients have no detectable or relevant abnormality. However, if the latter disorders are suspected, ultrasonography should be performed early in the course of investigations.

Do not forget that gallstones may be incidentally found on ultrasonography; in the absence of typical biliary pain or alarm features, these can usually be ignored. Barium studies can be useful, especially if mechanical obstruction of the proximal small bowel is suspected. Psychiatric disorders, such as depression, anxiety, somatoform disorder and eating disorders, should be considered in patients with chronic refractory symptoms.

The benefit of scintigraphic gastric-emptying studies in routine clinical practice is not established. However, in selected cases with certain symptoms (e.g. severe postprandial fullness or recurrent vomiting) and normal endoscopic findings, documentation of the presence and extent of delayed emptying or abnormal handling of solids (especially with regard to the lag phase and rates of emptying) can improve diagnostic precision and indicate lines of further therapy. A 4-hour gastric emptying test is the preferred technique. Gastric manometric and myoelectrical assessments of gastric and proximal small bowel motility are specialised techniques available in some centres and, at the present time, remain indicated for advanced investigation of severe or unusual cases only.

If gastroparesis is identified, systemic disorders such as diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, and connective tissue diseases, as well as drug side effects and small bowel obstruction, should be excluded. The demonstration of gastroparesis also indicates that particular therapies may need to be pursued more vigorously. Small, frequent low-fat meals combined with a prokinetic (e.g. domperidone) plus, if nausea is prominent, an antiemetic can be helpful in the setting of gastroparesis. Gastric electrical stimulation has been reported to improve symptoms of vomiting without improvement in gastric emptying rate in severe cases, although convincing controlled trials are lacking.

Diseases Associated With Epigastric Pain or Discomfort

Chronic peptic ulcer

Aetiology and pathophysiology

Chronic peptic ulcer can be defined as a break in the mucosa of greater than 5 mm with depth (Figs 6.2 and 6.3). An erosion, on the other hand, is smaller, lacks depth and is not associated with symptoms. In the general population, a chronic ulcer can be demonstrated in about 20% of patients with dyspepsia who are investigated; the risk is higher in the elderly.

Gastric acid secretion (from the parietal cells in the body and fundus of the stomach) is controlled by several interrelated factors in health, but the main stimulus is food. The cephalic phase comprises the acid response to the anticipation of food, or the sight, smell or taste of food, and is mediated by the vagus nerve. The gastric phase comprises acid secretion in response to food (primarily amino acids and amines) via gastrin release from the antral G cells. The intestinal phase occurs in response to food (especially protein) reaching the small bowel. Coffee and alcohol also stimulate acid secretion. A negative feedback loop operates when the gastric pH drops below 3, causing gastrin release to be strongly inhibited, by release of somatostatin from antral D cells.

The three main causes of chronic ulcer are H. pylori gastritis, NSAIDs and gastrinoma (the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome).

H. pylori is a chronic infection of the stomach that causes chronic histological gastritis and most peptic ulcer disease (see Ch 5).

Traditional NSAIDs inhibit the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase and hence reduce the production of prostaglandins such as PGE2 and PGI2, impairing gastrointestinal mucosal defence. NSAIDs (whether given orally, rectally or systemically) induce subepithelial haemorrhage and erosions in the stomach and/or duodenum in about two-thirds of patients. Up to 20% of NSAID users develop chronic gastric ulceration, while perhaps 5–10% develop duodenal ulcers. Chronic NSAID users are at a three- to six-times increased risk of serious gastric and duodenal ulcer complications (bleeding, perforation or death) compared with non-users. Unfortunately, complications are the presenting feature rather than dyspepsia in more than half the patients who develop NSAID-related peptic ulceration. NSAID ulcers and ulcer complications occur more commonly in the elderly (those over 60 years of age), with high doses, in those with a prior history of peptic ulcer or bleeding, with multiple NSAID use or steroids, with concurrent use of anticoagulants, and in the presence of other serious illness. Those with H. pylori infection and exposure to NSAIDs may be at higher risk of ulcer than those with just one of these factors, but this is controversial. NSAIDs may also cause small bowel disease (ulceration and perforation) and colonic disease (stricture and colitis). COX-2-selective NSAIDs are associated with significantly less peptic ulceration.

Treatment

All cases of chronic peptic ulceration associated with H. pylori should be treated with combination antibacterial therapy plus antisecretory therapy (Ch 5). Antisecretory therapy is usually then continued for a further 4–6 weeks to ensure ulcer healing although this may not be absolutely necessary. With this type of therapy, successful cure of the infection in over 70% of patients and resolution of the ulcer can be achieved.

As well as efficacy, the choice of regimen is dependent on other factors, in particular compliance with the drugs, local resistance patterns of H. pylori, and costs of the therapy. It is recommended that cure of infection be checked by a breath test or stool test (or endoscopic biopsy) at least 1 month after ceasing therapy. If initial therapy fails for H. pylori, a repeat course with different agents can be tried.

Gastric ulcers need to be followed up by endoscopy to ensure healing and exclude malignancy. If treatment regimens to eradicate H. pylori fail, then long-term proton pump inhibitor maintenance therapy can be utilised.

Ulcers associated with NSAID use are ideally treated by stopping the NSAID—at least while ulcer healing therapy is given. In this situation, any conventional ulcer healing regimen can be employed, such as a proton pump inhibitor, as single therapy. If H. pylori is present, it should also be treated.

If traditional NSAID therapy is required long term, the lowest dose of a short-acting and less toxic NSAID (e.g. ibuprofen) should be prescribed. Enteric-coated or rectal NSAIDs do not significantly reduce the risk of ulcer. Co-prescription with a proton pump inhibitor or a prostaglandin analogue such as misoprostol is a reasonable option, and is more effective than prophylaxis with H2-receptor antagonists (which at standard dose reduce duodenal but not gastric ulcer recurrence from NSAIDs). Misoprostol has been shown to reduce the occurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcer by more than 60% over the subsequent months, as well as ulcer complications.

Surgery is now rarely indicated for control of peptic ulcer disease as cure is attainable (Fig 6.4). When surgery is required, the surgery is directed at treating the complication (e.g. oversewing the perforation or under-running the bleeding ulcer). Rarely, a gastric resection will be required if a gastric ulcer is resistant to healing and malignancy cannot be confidently excluded. The ulcer diathesis can be treated by conventional therapy (listed above) after the patient has recovered from the operation. However, many patients in the past underwent gastric surgery for this disease. The complications that may arise in these cases are summarised in Box 6.1.

image

Figure 6.4 Schematic overview of Billroth-I and B-II partial gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction with their indications and their consequences for gastric emptying.

Based on Smout AJPM, Akkermans LMA, Reud K. Normal and Disturbed Motility of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Petersfield: Wrightson Biomedical Publishing; 1992, with permission.

Zollinger-Ellison (ZE)/syndrome

The Zollinger-Ellison syndrome refers to a gastrinoma causing gastric acid hypersecretion and, frequently, peptic ulceration. The tumours producing this syndrome may be found in the pancreas (85%) or the duodenal wall. Two-thirds are malignant with metastases. Ulcers in this syndrome may be single or multiple. The increased gastrin may cause gastric hypertrophy with prominent folds. Diarrhoea with or without steatorrhoea occurs in one-third of cases (because the high acid level damages small bowel mucosa, inactivates pancreatic lipase and deconjugates bile salts); in 10% of cases, diarrhoea is the only presenting symptom. The Zollinger-Ellison syndrome can also occur as part of the multiple-endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type I syndrome where there is hyperplasia, adenoma or carcinoma of the pancreatic islets, parathyroid and pituitary. This is an autosomal-dominant condition, so there may be a family history of ulcer. In addition to the clinical features found with a gastrinoma, there is usually hypercalcaemia, secondary to parathyroid disease (Ch 26). Serum gastrin levels should be checked to screen for this diagnosis if patients have multiple or refractory ulcers, enlarged gastric folds or a dilated duodenum, an ulcer plus diarrhoea or steatorrhoea, or hypercalcaemia, associated with ulcer disease. A serum gastrin concentration greater than 1000 μg/mL in patients producing gastric acid (which can be measured by testing the pH of gastric juice at endoscopy or by formal gastric secretory function testing) is virtually diagnostic. Conditions such as pernicious anaemia or postvagotomy surgery can cause a high serum gastrin level, but gastric acid secretion is low. In difficult cases, a secretin test is helpful; gastrinomas cause a paradoxical rise in gastrin in response to a secretin bolus of greater than 100 μg/mL above baseline. Once a diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is made, consideration should be given to whether there is evidence of MEN I (e.g. hyperparathyroidism). Thereafter, evidence of metastatic spread (over 60% are malignant) and tumour localisation is sought by a contrast computed tomography (CT) (5 mm sections). Endoscopic ultrasound may identify small tumours. Imaging may miss up to 30% of tumours in this syndrome. Even if no tumour is found by scanning, it can usually be located by surgery.

The tumour should be resected where feasible (liver metastases may also be amenable to resection); otherwise, patients are managed with high dose proton (acid) pump inhibitors to control gastric acid. Approximately 50% of patients who cannot be completely resected die from tumour spread in 10 years; newer chemotherapy regimens may reduce disease progression.

Functional (non-ulcer) dyspepsia

One in six people report chronic symptoms of dyspepsia if asked, and the majority with no alarm features (e.g. weight loss and vomiting) have no obvious organic cause found at investigation, leading to a working diagnosis of functional dyspepsia.

Pathophysiology

Although the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia remains unknown, a number of physiological factors appear to be associated with the disorder. Most attention has been directed towards assessment of upper gut sensorimotor function.

In health, the main motor functions of the stomach are temporarily storing ingested food during the process of breakdown of solids, emptying chyme appropriately into the small bowel, and emptying the indigestible solids remaining in the stomach after a meal. During ingestion of a meal, vagally-mediated receptive relaxation of the proximal stomach occurs in response to swallowing. This relaxation prepares the proximal stomach to receive oesophageal contents, and is followed by gastric accommodation, whereby the proximal stomach progressively relaxes to accommodate increasing volumes, while maintaining a relatively constant intragastric pressure. Solid emptying is largely controlled by antral and pyloric motor activity. Phasic contractions (the migrating motor complex) sweep from the midstomach to the pylorus, at a frequency of three per minute, mixing and grinding the food until particles are approximately 1 mm in size. Emptying of liquids is controlled by coordinated motor activity in the fundus, body and antrum. Proximal gastric tone appears to be of particular importance in liquid emptying. The pylorus is an important functional component of the gastroduodenal region and also regulates solid and liquid emptying. The rate of gastric emptying is regulated by additional factors such as the osmolality and fat content of the meal, the amount of gastric acid secreted and duodenal motility. Liquids empty more rapidly than solids; the time taken for half the gastric contents to empty after ingestion of a standard mixed meal is about 90 minutes for the solid phase, and about 30 minutes for the liquid phase.

Delayed gastric emptying, predominantly for solids, but also for liquids, is observed in 25% of patients with functional dyspepsia. Fast gastric emptying occurs uncommonly (10%). Abnormalities in intragastric distribution of the meal can also be documented. Postprandial antral hypomotility is accepted as the cause of delayed gastric emptying in most cases, but alterations in duodenal motility may also play a role. The underlying cause of such motility abnormalities is unknown. The presence of gastric stasis, however, correlates poorly with symptoms in individual patients and, thus, its importance in the syndrome of functional dyspepsia is not established.

Failure of the fundus to relax normally after meal ingestion occurs in up to 40% of patients with functional dyspepsia. This can cause the symptom of early satiety in some of these patients. The mechanical accommodation of the stomach to gastric balloon distension (compliance), however, does not appear to be different between patients and control subjects.

At least some cases of functional dyspepsia appear to be associated with an enhanced gastroduodenal sensitivity to distension (Fig 6.5). The relationship between this phenomenon and the alterations in upper gut motility described above is not clear, but it is likely that in some cases these may be a consequence of altered visceral afferent function. Gastric volumes required to induce feelings of distension and pain have been shown to be significantly lower in patients with functional dyspepsia than in control subjects.

image

Figure 6.5 Heightened gastric sensitivity to balloon distension of the stomach in patients with functional dyspepsia versus control subjects. Note the onset of symptoms at lower pressures in patients with functional dyspepsia. MDP = minimal distending pressure.

Based on data from Mearin F, Culcala M, Azpiroz F, et al. The origin of symptoms on the brain-gut axis in functional dyspepsial. Gastroenterology 1991; 101:999–1006, with permission from the American Gastroenterological Society.

H. pylori gastritis histologically is found in 30% of dyspeptic patients with no evidence of peptic ulcer disease. However, H. pylori gastritis is common in totally asymptomatic subjects. The presence of the gastritis does not appear to have an important influence on the prevalence or type of gastric motor dysfunction. Cure of infection results in symptomatic improvement in a minority long term (with a 10% benefit over placebo).

Although acute stress can alter gastrointestinal function and induce symptoms in healthy subjects, the role of life-event stress in the pathogenesis of chronic functional dyspepsia remains controversial. It appears, however, that life events that are highly threatening or which lead to frustration of goals are associated with functional dyspepsia. It is important to note that no characteristic personality profile is demonstrable in patients with functional dyspepsia. Anxiety but not depression is linked to functional dyspepsia. Psychosocial disturbances such as neuroticism, anxiety and depression probably also influence the decision to seek healthcare.

Treatment

The approach to treatment is outlined in Box 6.2 and Figure 6.1.

Box 6.2 Key features of functional dyspepsia

Once a positive diagnosis has been made, management of functional dyspepsia is based on reassurance regarding the absence of serious disease, and an explanation of the possible factors producing symptoms. Patients should be advised to avoid specific foods that aggravate their symptoms (such as coffee and alcohol) and also to avoid any medications that may be provoking symptoms. A reduced-fat diet may be beneficial, as fat delays gastric motor function more profoundly than other dietary constituents. For postprandial symptoms, a decrease in meal size with more frequent meals should be tried. The presence of anxiety, depression and chronic stress should be explored and can be addressed from the outset with simple forms of counselling; untreated anxiety or depression may impair the response to other forms of therapy. An explanation of the ways in which stress can affect upper gut function is often valuable, and is used to emphasise the recurrent or episodic nature of the symptoms. If the dyspeptic symptoms are longstanding, a psychological precipitant (e.g. a stressful life event or fear of organic disease)—rather than the specific gastrointestinal symptoms themselves—may account for the current visit. Recognition of this may avoid multiple visits and extensive gastrointestinal investigations.

If symptoms are affecting quality of life significantly, drug therapy should be considered. Medical therapy can usually provide at least partial relief of symptoms; this may be related to the high placebo treatment effect (up to 60% in functional dyspepsia).

All H. pylori-positive patients with functional dyspepsia may be offered eradication therapy for dyspeptic symptoms, but many will not benefit. Trials with antisecretory drugs, particularly the proton pump inhibitors, have indicated that these medications are modestly superior to placebo in the therapy of functional dyspepsia; patients with epigastric pain may be more likely to respond. Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that these medications should be first-line medications.

If there is no improvement, a prokinetic drug (e.g. domperidone, 10 mg, three times per day) can be tried. The prokinetic drugs have been shown to be effective in improving symptoms in functional dyspepsia. The original agent in this class was metoclopramide, and although early studies suggested symptomatic improvement when compared with placebo, recent assessments are not available. Moreover, the side-effect profile, especially extrapyramidal reactions, is problematic. Domperidone, a dopamine-receptor antagonist with fewer side-effects than metoclopramide, has been shown to be more effective than placebo in relieving symptoms, although the data in functional dyspepsia are limited.

In general, long-term drug treatment should be avoided in most patients with functional dyspepsia. For those patients with frequent relapses, short intermittent treatment courses (for example, 1–2 weeks) may be considered when no other management is successful and symptoms are significantly affecting the patient’s quality of life. Antidepressants may have a role in difficult cases, although few studies have addressed the use of psychotropics in functional dyspepsia. Newer medications, such as drugs that modify visceral afferent function, may allow a wider choice of therapeutic agents in the future.

Chronic pancreatitis

The most common cause of chronic pancreatitis is alcohol (Box 6.3). Alcohol leads to hypersecretion of a proteinaceous fluid that can precipitate first in the small pancreatic ducts and later in the main pancreatic ducts. These deposits block the ducts and cause dilatation of the ducteals; later, inflammatory infiltrates appear. It is unclear whether or not the normal pancreas secretes a specific protein that inhibits calcium carbonate stone formation (stone-inhibitor protein). Smoking increases the risk of chronic pancreatitis.

Clinical presentation

While patients with chronic pancreatitis may present with episodes of acute pancreatitis (Ch 4), the common mode of presentation is intermittent abdominal pain, usually in the epigastric region after eating (15–30 minutes) and radiating to the back. It may improve by the patient sitting upright and leaning forward. The pain may also occur in the right or left upper quadrant. It is typically severe and is unrelieved by eating or antacids. Alcohol and fatty meals may make the pain worse. It tends to become more continuous with disease progression. There may be diarrhoea and steatorrhoea as well as weight loss due to pancreatic insufficiency (Ch 14). Commonly these patients have a history of high analgesic use and abuse. The clinical problem may be very difficult to evaluate if the patient has become narcotic-dependent. Thus, it may be hard to be sure which of the symptoms are due to chronic pancreatitis.

On physical examination, there may be signs of wasting and malnutrition. Rarely, jaundice is present because of obstruction of the common bile duct. Patients may also have evidence of diabetes mellitus with advanced disease. Other complications of chronic pancreatitis include the development of pseudocysts, which may become infected (Ch 4). Pancreatic ascites can also occur (Ch 20). Clinical evidence of vitamin deficiency is rare (fat-soluble vitamins [A, D, E and K] or B12).

Diagnosis

Levels of amylase and lipase are unhelpful. A plain abdominal x-ray examination may show pancreatic calcification (in 30% of cases), which is virtually diagnostic. An abdominal CT scan will detect pancreatic calcification more often. A CT or ultrasound scan may also show a shrunken pancreas with dilatation of the main pancreatic duct that is a pointer to the diagnosis. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the next test to perform if the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis is suspected but other tests have been unhelpful. This provides information on the morphology of the ducts. An alternative is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but complications (2%) include acute pancreatitis, sepsis and cholangitis. Endoscopic ultrasound is an alternative and may be as useful as ERCP.

If patients have diarrhoea or suspected steatorrhoea, a 3-day faecal fat estimation should be obtained. A faecal fat excretion of over 40 g per day is usually only seen with pancreatic steatorrhoea (Ch 14). Cystic fibrosis needs to be considered in children or young adults in such cases and a sweat electrolyte test should be obtained. It is also important to check serum calcium and triglyceride levels to exclude these rare causes of chronic pancreatitis.

Non-invasive tests of pancreatic function, such as the bentiromide and the pancreolauryl tests, are useful in patients with moderate or severe chronic pancreatitis but both false-positive and false-negative results do occur. Intubation studies, such as the secretin test (which stimulates pancreatic exocrine secretion that is measured by obtaining a duodenal aspirate), are not widely available.

The differential diagnosis must include pancreatic cancer, as well as rare diseases such as autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic endocrine tumours.

Treatment

Control of abdominal pain is the main problem in most patients. Narcotic addiction needs to be avoided. Total alcohol absence is essential as this may reduce the pain. Oral pancreatic enzyme preparations reduce pain (because they reduce cholecystokinin secretion, leading to a negative feedback on the pancreas, putting it at rest). Large doses are required with meals. Pancreatic steatorrhoea is also treated with pancreatic enzyme replacement. The usual dose is six to eight tablets, or three capsules of enteric-coated pancreases. One or two tablets should be taken on starting the meal, and during and just after the meal. Small, low-fat meals should be prescribed. If this fails, antisecretory therapy to reduce gastric acid secretion (acid inactivates the enzymes) can be helpful. Pain control may be achieved with a short course of narcotics plus a low-dose tricyclic antidepressant and a NSAID long term. Hospitalisation keeping the patient nil by mouth may be needed until pain control is achieved. The usefulness of octreotide is uncertain, but may be worth a trial.

In difficult cases, relief of pancreatic duct obstruction with endoscopic removal of stones or extracorporeal lithotripsy may sometimes be helpful. Temporary insertion of a stent into a proximally obstructed pancreatic duct may be of value. If a pseudocyst is present in a patient with pain, it may respond to drainage, which can be done radiologically, endoscopically or occasionally by surgery. Coeliac axis nerve blocks are worth a trial, and bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy has shown promise.

Surgery (e.g. a lateral pancreaticojejunostomy [Puestow] procedure) can alleviate pain when the pancreatic duct or system is dilated. Another approach is lateral pancreaticojejunostomy with saucerisation and drainage of the head of the pancreas (Frey’s operation). This procedure is also effective in patients without a dilated main pancreatic duct. Focal disease in the head or tail of the pancreas can be treated by a pylorus-preserving pancreaticojejunostomy or distal pancreatectomy. Resection may also be indicated if carcinoma of the pancreas cannot be excluded; this complication occurs in 5–10% of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Surgery has approximately a 70–90% rate of success.

Key Points