Indications and Contraindications

Published on 18/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 18/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1058 times

CHAPTER 35 Indications and Contraindications

Just as with hip and knee arthroplasty, as the volume of shoulder arthroplasties performed each year increases, so will the number of patients requiring revision shoulder arthroplasty. Indications for performing revision shoulder arthroplasty are variable and numerous and can include problems related to the glenoid, problems related to the humerus, and problems related to the soft tissues (rotator cuff, instability). Rarely, infection, either early postoperative or late-appearing hematogenous, is an indication for revision arthroplasty. Complications related to healing of the greater and lesser tuberosities can be observed after unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty performed for proximal humeral fractures. Finally, certain periprosthetic humeral fractures are an indication for revision shoulder arthroplasty. This chapter details our specific indications and contraindications for revision shoulder arthroplasty.

PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE GLENOID

Problems related to the glenoid are the most common indications for revision shoulder arthroplasty in our practice. One category consists of patients with problems of their native glenoid (glenoid erosion), and a second category includes patients who have problems with a previously placed glenoid component.

Glenoid Erosion

Glenoid erosion after hemiarthroplasty is a multifactorial problem.1 It may occur early or late and does not seem to be related to any readily identifiable risk factor. This problem occurs when the metallic prosthetic humeral head erodes into the softer glenoid bone (Fig. 35-1). Initially, pain may be the sole manifestation of this problem. As the erosion progresses medially, the normal length-tension relationships of the rotator cuff may become compromised and result in substantial weakness (Fig. 35-2).

Glenoid erosion may be central or peripheral. If the rotator cuff is intact, as in primary osteoarthritis, the erosion is usually central or, less commonly, posterior (Fig. 35-3). If the rotator cuff is deficient, the erosion is generally superior (Fig. 35-4) or, less commonly, anterior (if the subscapularis is deficient; Fig. 35-5).

Glenoid erosion is best treated by resurfacing of the glenoid if sufficient native glenoid bone is available for implantation of a glenoid component (see Chapter 36). Frequently, the humeral component will require revision for glenoid exposure, and two options are available to the surgeon. We may exchange the component for a smaller head size in an unconstrained arthroplasty (Fig. 35-6) or change to a reverse-design arthroplasty. In general, with a functioning rotator cuff, an unconstrained arthroplasty is performed for revision arthroplasty. If rotator cuff function is significantly compromised, revision to a reverse prosthesis is performed.

Glenoid Component Failure

Glenoid component failure can vary from subtle loosening to migration of the component with severe glenoid bone loss (Fig. 35-7). Additionally, mechanical failure of the implant can necessitate revision surgery (Fig. 35-8). When considering revision surgery for failure of a glenoid component, the surgeon must first decide whether to simply remove the failed glenoid component or to remove the failed glenoid component and reconstruct the osseous glenoid. In debilitated patients seeking mainly pain relief without significant concern for function, isolated removal of the glenoid component is usually the best treatment option. In other patients, glenoid reconstruction with iliac crest bone graft is indicated. For patients undergoing revision with an unconstrained prosthesis, we reconstruct the glenoid with an iliac crest bone graft as the first stage. Six months later, after complete incorporation of the bone graft, if the shoulder is still painful, we perform the second stage, which consists of placement of a new glenoid component (Fig. 35-9). When performing revision surgery with a reverse-design prosthesis, glenoid reconstruction and revision can often be performed as a single stage, provided that the central post of the revision glenoid component can be firmly seated in native glenoid bone (Fig. 35-10).

Buy Membership for Orthopaedics Category to continue reading. Learn more here