Implantation of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2629 times

Chapter 16 Implantation of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems

Opioids produce a profound inhibition of the evoked discharge of spinal nociceptive neurons, thereby inhibiting the transmission of pain. Intrathecally administered opioids have no effect on the motor function and autonomic responses. The analgesic effect of opioids is dose dependent and antagonized by naloxone.

Instrumentation

Equipment required for implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system consists of the following:

Drugs needed for implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system are as follows:

image

Figure 16–10 Package of Highmol (20 mg/2 mL/ampoule)

(BC World Pharmacy Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea).

Procedure

This procedure describes the implantation of a SynchroMed II Infusion System pump (procedure might be slightly different for other products).

Step 1: Pump Preparation

3. Empty the pump:

a. Remove the protective cap from the catheter port (Fig. 16-2) by pulling it away. A drop of water will appear from the catheter connector of the pump within 1 to 2 minutes. Leave the protective catheter connector cover off.
b. Insert the 22-gauge noncoring needle (Fig. 16-3) into the reservoir fill port septum until the needle touches the metal needle stop. Maintain negative pressure to withdraw the sterile water from the pump into the empty syringe. Empty the reservoir completely, until air bubbles stop flowing into the syringe (Fig. 16-11).

Step 2: Implant Procedure

The catheter is often implanted while an assistant prepares the pump.

12. Secure the anchor (Fig. 16-6) to the lumbodorsal fascia, not to the subcutaneous fat, with the use of heavy, nonabsorbable sutures. Place the anchor as close as possible to the spinal entry point, using a nonabsorbable suture to prevent dislodgement or kinking of the catheter from spinal and ligament motion. Both ends of the anchor are tied with non-absorbable suture to secure the catheter to the anchor and should not be fixed with surround tissues which may cause catheter fracture because of the tension applied by repeated flexion and extension of body. Apply surgical glue around the anchoring area and spinal entry point of the needle.

Complications

Procedural problems that may occur after implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system include the following:

Drug-related problems that may occur after implantation of such a system are local and systemic toxicity and side effects.

The catheter problems that may occur are as follows:

image

Figure 16–24 Standard radiograph with injection of contrast agent via the side port shows a leak in the subdural space (arrow).

(From Pasquier Y, Schnider A, Cahana A. Subdural catheter migration may lead to baclofen pump dysfunction. Spinal Cord 2003;41:700-702.)

image

Figure 16–25 Computed tomography scan showing leak in the subdural space (single arrow) and catheter tip (double arrow).

(From Pasquier Y, Schnider A, Cahana A. Subdural catheter migration may lead to baclofen pump dysfunction. Spinal Cord 2003;41:700-702.)

The following pump problems may be seen after implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system:

Another problem that may occur is drug underdose or overdose, for the following reasons:

CASE STUDY 16.1 Cancer Pain

A 64-year-old man was admitted to the Seoul National University Hospital Pain Management Center with intractable abdominal pain. He had been diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer 3 years ago and had undergone total gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, splenectomy, and chemotherapy, but the cancer had recurred.

Three months before admission to our pain management center, the patient experienced severe upper abdominal pain and back pain because of infiltration of cancer to the peripancreatic lymph nodes and nerve. Morphine was infused intravenously up to 3 mg/hr using a patient-controlled analgesia device without effectively alleviating the pain. Celiac plexus block and splanchnic nerve radiofrequency thermocoagulation were performed, which achieved temporary reduction of pain. After these treatments, the patient complained only of periumbilical pain for 2 weeks, and thereafter his severe pain was aggravated. OxyContin 320 mg/day, nortriptyline 10 mg/day, alprazolam 0.375 mg/day, gabapentin 900 mg/day, and laxative were also prescribed. However, the patient still complained of severe constipation, urinary retention, and poor pain control.

Intrathecal drug delivery system (ITDDS) was scheduled and a single epidural injection of morphine was performed with 3 mg of morphine in 10 mL of 0.9% normal saline. After the trial administration of epidural morphine, no side effects were noted, and considerable pain relief was observed.

Implantation of the ITDDS was performed 1 day after the test trial of morphine. The skin entry point was the middle of the L4 body, and the intrathecal entry level was L2-L3 (Fig. 16-26). The catheter tip was located at T11 (Fig. 16-27).

OxyContin 320 mg/day given orally is equivalent to 320 mg/day of oral morphine. A 320 mg/day dosage of oral morphine is equivalent to 107 mg/day of IV morphine, 11 mg/day of epidural morphine, and 1.1 mg/day of intrathecal morphine. The initial drug delivery was 0.5 mg/day (half of the usual daily intake of opioids) of Highmol (20 mg/2 mL/ampoule, BC World Pharmacy Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea). However, the patient still complained of pain, so an IV injection of 10 mg of morphine was given during the 6-hour observation period. The infusion rate was increased incrementally up to 1.0 mg/day under close observation.

Two days after the implantation, the patient was discharged from the hospital without any complications. The chronic constipation and urinary retention in association with high oral opioid intake had subsided. The patient was totally satisfied with the ITDDS implantation. Three months after the implantation, the infusion rate has not required elevation.

CASTE STUDY 16.2 Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

A 45-year-old man was admitted to the Seoul National University Hospital Pain Management Center with complaints of intractable right leg pain spreading to the whole body after a traffic accident. The patient had been diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome type I in 2005 and was treated with medications, physiotherapy, psychotherapy, lumbar epidural injections, right lumbar sympathetic plexus blocks with or without alcohol neurolysis, as well as spinal cord stimulator implantation. In spite of these treatments, he complained of intractable pain. He had been treated with gabapentin 3600 mg/day, alprazolam 0.75 mg/day, a laxative, IR codone (an immediate-release form of OxyContin, Mundipharma International Limited, Cambridge, UK) 30 mg/day, hydromorphone 6 mg/day, and a fentanyl patch 50 μg/hr. However, he frequently complained of pain with intensity of 10 on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS).

Prior to intrathecal drug delivery system (ITDDS) implantation, a test dose of 3 mg morphine was administered epidurally without stopping the transdermal fentanyl and oral opioid therapy. After the epidural morphine trial, the patient complained of temporary urinary retention but the VAS score for the patient’s whole body pain was reduced from 10 to 0, indicating that an inadequate dose of opioids had been prescribed. Such a favorable response to the epidural morphine trial allowed him to proceed with the implantation of the ITDDS (SynchroMed II, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN).

Implantation of the ITDDS was performed one day after the test trial of morphine. The skin entry point is middle of the L4 body and intrathecal entry level was L2-L3. The catheter tip was located at T11 (Fig. 16-28). The total opioid oral intake was calculated to be 154 mg/day of PO morphine: IR codone 30 mg/day PO, hydromorphone 6 mg/day PO, and fentanyl patch (50 μg/hr = 1.2 mg/day of patch). Morphine at 154 mg/day given orally is equivalent to 51 mg/day of IV morphine, 5 mg/day of epidural morphine, and 0.5 mg/day of intrathecal morphine. Highmol (20 mg/2 mL/ampoule) was diluted to 5 mg/mL with a preservative-free 0.9% normal saline, and the initial morphine delivery rate was 0.25 mg/day (half of the usual daily intake of opioids). It was increased gradually up to 1.0 mg/day with an interval of 12 hours, with the patient under close observation for opioid side effects.

Two days after the implantation, the patient’s average VAS pain score was 4, and he was discharged without any complications.