Chapter 16 Implantation of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems
Indications
Implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system is indicated for:

Contraindications
Contraindications to implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system are as follows:
Instrumentation

Figure 16–1 Various sizes of Tricumed intrathecal pumps (Tricumed Medizintechnik GmbH, Kiel, Germany).

Figure 16–5 A catheter with a stylet (top) and a 15-gauge spinal needle (bottom) for spinal catheterization.
Drugs needed for implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system are as follows:
Preoperative preparation
Physical examination should include the following actions:

Patient and caregiver education should be performed as follows:

Procedure
Step 1: Pump Preparation
Step 2: Implant Procedure
The catheter is often implanted while an assistant prepares the pump.

Figure 16–17 A pursestring suture is placed around the Tuohy needle and will be tied after the needle has been removed.
Postprocedural management
After implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system, the following actions should be taken
Program the pump
Complete the four primary steps in determining the postoperative priming bolus, as follows:
Complications
The catheter problems that may occur are as follows:

Figure 16–24 Standard radiograph with injection of contrast agent via the side port shows a leak in the subdural space (arrow).
(From Pasquier Y, Schnider A, Cahana A. Subdural catheter migration may lead to baclofen pump dysfunction. Spinal Cord 2003;41:700-702.)

Figure 16–25 Computed tomography scan showing leak in the subdural space (single arrow) and catheter tip (double arrow).
(From Pasquier Y, Schnider A, Cahana A. Subdural catheter migration may lead to baclofen pump dysfunction. Spinal Cord 2003;41:700-702.)
The following pump problems may be seen after implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system:
Another problem that may occur is drug underdose or overdose, for the following reasons:


CASE STUDY 16.1 Cancer Pain
Implantation of the ITDDS was performed 1 day after the test trial of morphine. The skin entry point was the middle of the L4 body, and the intrathecal entry level was L2-L3 (Fig. 16-26). The catheter tip was located at T11 (Fig. 16-27).

Figure 16–26 Intrathecal entry point at L2/3 disc level (single arrow) and catheter shadow in intrathecal area (split arrow).
CASTE STUDY 16.2 Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Implantation of the ITDDS was performed one day after the test trial of morphine. The skin entry point is middle of the L4 body and intrathecal entry level was L2-L3. The catheter tip was located at T11 (Fig. 16-28). The total opioid oral intake was calculated to be 154 mg/day of PO morphine: IR codone 30 mg/day PO, hydromorphone 6 mg/day PO, and fentanyl patch (50 μg/hr = 1.2 mg/day of patch). Morphine at 154 mg/day given orally is equivalent to 51 mg/day of IV morphine, 5 mg/day of epidural morphine, and 0.5 mg/day of intrathecal morphine. Highmol (20 mg/2 mL/ampoule) was diluted to 5 mg/mL with a preservative-free 0.9% normal saline, and the initial morphine delivery rate was 0.25 mg/day (half of the usual daily intake of opioids). It was increased gradually up to 1.0 mg/day with an interval of 12 hours, with the patient under close observation for opioid side effects.