Imperforate Anus

Published on 27/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2947 times

CHAPTER 21 Imperforate Anus

Step 2: Preoperative Considerations

Associated Defects

Management of Anorectal Malformations During the Neonatal Period

Males

Females

A decision-making algorithm for the initial management of females is shown in Fig. 21-3. Perineal inspection usually provides more information in girls than in boys. The principle of waiting 20 to 24 hours before making a decision is again valuable.
Perineal inspection may reveal the presence of a vestibular fistula (Fig. 21-4, in prone position), which is the most common condition in girls. In cases with rectovestibular fistula, the rectal orifice is located within the vestibule and outside the hymen. A true rectovaginal fistula is an extremely rare anomaly.

High-Pressure Distal Colostography

Step 3: Operative Steps

Males

Colostomy

Rectourethral Fistula

When all muscle structures have been divided, the rectum can be seen (Fig. 21-8). In cases of rectourethral bulbar fistulas, the rectum is prominent, and it almost bulges into the wound. In cases of rectoprostatic fistulas, the rectum is located much higher, just under the coccyx. In cases of rectobladder neck fistulas, the rectum is not visible through this approach, and searching for it risks injury to other structures.
The anterior rectal wall immediately above the fistula is a thin structure. No plane of separation lies between the rectum and urethra in that area. A plane of separation must be created in the common wall. Multiple 6/0 silk sutures are placed through the rectal mucosa immediately above the fistula in a semicircumferential fashion (Fig. 21-9). The rectum is then separated from the urethra, creating a submucosal plane for approximately 5 to 10 mm above the fistula site. During this delicate dissection, it is helpful to dissect the rectum laterally, very close to the rectal wall, until both dissections (lateral and medial) meet, separating the rectum completely from the urinary tract. Once the rectum is fully separated, a circumferential perirectal dissection is performed to gain enough rectal length to reach the perineum. The rectum is surrounded by a conspicuous whitish fascia, and the dissection must be performed between this fascia and the rectal wall to avoid damage to the innervation of the bladder and genitalia.
The rectum is placed in front of the levator muscle and within the limits of the muscle complex (Fig. 21-10). The electrical stimulator is helpful in identifying the limits of the muscle structures. The anterior and posterior limits of the sphincter are temporarily marked with silk sutures. In cases where the incision is extended anteriorly beyond the limits of the sphincter, it is necessary to repair the anterior perineum with interrupted long-term, absorbable sutures to bring together both anterior limits of the sphincter. Long-lasting absorbable sutures are placed on the posterior edge of the levator muscle. The posterior limit of the muscle complex must also be reapproximated behind the rectum. These sutures should include part of the rectal wall to anchor it and thereby help to avoid rectal prolapse.

Rectobladder Neck Fistula

Repair in Girls

Vestibular Fistula

Once the dissection has been completed, the electrical stimulator is used to determine the limits of the sphincteric mechanism (Fig. 21-11). The anterior limit of the sphincter is reapproximated as previously described. The levator muscle is usually not exposed and therefore does not have to be reconstructed. The muscle complex must be reconstructed posterior to the rectum, and the anoplasty is performed as previously described.

Step 4: Postoperative Care

Step 5: Pearls and Pitfalls

Bibliography

Belizon A, Levitt MA, Shoshany G, et al. Rectal prolapse following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:192-196.

Belman BA, King LR. Urinary tract abnormalities associated with imperforate anus. J Urol. 1972;108:823-824.

Bianchi DW, Crombleholme TM, D’Alton ME. Cloacal exstrophy. In Fetology: Diagnosis and management of the fetal patient, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010; pp. 459-466

Boemers TM, de Jong TP, van Gool JD, Bax KM. Urologic problems in anorectal malformations. Part 2: Functional urologic sequelae. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(5):534-537.

deVries P, Peña A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17:638-643.

Drake JM. Occult tethered cord syndrome: not an indication for surgery. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(5):305-308.

Falcone RA, Levitt MA, Peña A, Bates MD. Increased heritability of certain phenotypes. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:124-128.

Georgeson K. Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2007;16(4):266-269.

Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT. Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus: a new technique. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:927-931.

Goon HK. Repair of anorectal anomalies in the neonatal period. Pediatr Surg Int. 1990;5:246-249.

Gross GW, Wolfson PJ, Peña A. Augmented-pressure colostogram in imperforate anus with fistula. Pediatr Radiol. 1991;21:560-563.

Hong AR, Rosen N, Acuña MF, et al. Urological injuries associated with the repair of anorectal malformations in male patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:339-344.

Levitt M, Falcone R, Peña A. Pediatric fecal incontinence. In: Fecal incontinence: Diagnosis and treatment. New York: Springer; 2007:341-350.

Levitt M, Peña A. Surgery and constipation: when, how, yes, no? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;41:S58-S60.

Levitt MA, Stein DM, Peña A. Gynecological concerns in the treatment of teenagers with cloaca. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(2):188-193.

Livingston J, Elicevik M, Crombleholme T, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of persistent cloaca: a 10 year review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):S63.

Peña A, deVries P. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17:796-881.

Pena A, Grasshoff S, Levitt A. Reoperations for anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:318-325.

Peña A, Guardino K, Tovilla JM, et al. Bowel management for fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(1):133-137.

Peña A, Levitt M. Colonic inertia disorders in pediatrics. Curr Prob Surg. 2002;39(7):661-730.

Peña A, Migotto-Krieger M, Levitt MA. Colostomy in anorectal malformations: a procedure with serious but preventable complications. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:748-756.

Seldon NR. Occult tethered cord syndrome: the case for surgery. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(5):302-304.

Shaul DB, Harrison EA. Classification of anorectal malformations—initial approach, diagnostic tests, and colostomy. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1997;6(4):187-195.

Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B. Associated malformations in patients with anorectal anomalies. Eur J Med Genet. 2007;50(4):281-290.

Vick LR, Gosche JR, Boulanger SC, Islam S. Primary laparoscopic repair of high imperforate anus in neonatal males. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:1877-1881.