How to prepare patients for endoscopic procedures

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3396 times

Chapter 28 HOW TO PREPARE PATIENTS FOR ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURES

KEY POINTS

Correct patient preparation involves:

ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT FITNESS FOR PROCEDURE

Health professionals assessing patients for endoscopy should be aware of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of patient risk (see Table 28.1). The degree of concern will be dictated somewhat by the level of anaesthetic support available for the procedure (which ranges between institutions from none to an anaesthesiologist, as well as varying for different types of procedures). In general, procedures on ASA class I and most class II patients can be safely performed in a well equipped endoscopy suite with appropriately trained staff. ASA class III patients might be better triaged to the operating room. This degree of patient risk must be identified prior to the endoscopy list so that appropriate patient assessment (and informed consent) can be undertaken as well as ensuring that the procedure is performed in the appropriate environment.

Table 28.1 Definition of American Society for Anesthesiologists comorbidity status

Class 1 Patient has no organic, physiologic, biochemical or psychiatric disturbance. The pathologic process for which the operation is to be performed is localised and does not entail systemic disturbance
Class 2 Mild to moderate systemic disturbance caused by either the condition to be treated surgically or by other pathophysiologic processes
Class 3 Severe systemic disturbance or disease from whatever cause, even though it may not be possible to define the degree of disability with finality
Class 4 Severe systemic disorders that are life-threatening, not always correctable by operation
Class 5 The moribund patient who has little chance of survival but is submitted to the operation in desperation

PROCEDURE-SPECIFIC ISSUES

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

The same considerations regarding fasting and gastroscopy apply to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In addition, because ERCP is potentially a very dangerous procedure, consent issues are especially important.

For this reason, patients who have had a recent barium enema, computed tomography (CT) scan with oral contrast or enteroclysis should have a plain abdominal X-ray to ensure that the region of interest is not obscured.

ERCP involves injection of iodinated contrast into the biliary and pancreatic duct systems. It is extremely unlikely that patients with iodine allergy would have an allergic reaction in this setting. Nonetheless, many radiologists recommend a regimen for these patients such as:

In addition, patients with uncontrolled hyperthyroidism should avoid an iodine load. This may involve delaying the procedure or using another contrast agent such as gadolinium.

Patients with biliary obstruction should receive prophylactic antibiotics prior to the commencement of the procedure (see below for a more detailed discussion of antibiotic prophylaxis). Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) of the ampulla of Vater is a common procedure during ERCP. Patients in whom ES is considered should have an international noramalised ratio (INR) <1.7 (ideally normalised) and should not take IIb/IIIa inhibitors such as clopidogrel for 7–10 days if the procedure is elective. Aspirin use does not preclude ES, but ideally should also be ceased 5 days before the procedure.

Colonoscopy

Proper preparation is a prerequisite for adequate colonoscopic examination. A poorly prepared colon may lead to missed pathology and often requires repeat examination.

Two colonic purges are commonly used: polyethylene-glycol (PEG)-based solutions and sodium phosphate-based solutions. Both are osmotic, though sodium phosphate is hypertonic whereas PEG-based solutions are essentially isotonic. Sodium phosphate purges have the advantage of requiring a smaller volume to be consumed (as they draw water into the bowel by osmotic pressure). This smaller ingested volume leads to better compliance. However, this may cause dangerous dehydration or electrolyte imbalances such as hyperphosphataemia. This is especially a concern in elderly patients or those with renal impairment. Furthermore, sodium phosphate purges may cause mild inflammation of the colonic mucosa and sometimes small aphthous ulcers. Therefore this type of purge is best avoided in patients undergoing colonoscopy to assess inflammatory bowel disease. PEG-based solutions cause less fluid and electrolyte disturbance, but may be difficult to ingest due to their large volume (3–4 litres). Only approximately 80% of patients complete a PEG-based purge.

Stimulant purgatives such as senna are not effective as sole agents and are rarely used. Fermentation of osmotic sugar purgatives such as mannitol, sorbitol and lactulose by gut bacteria may lead to high colonic concentrations of hydrogen gas. This can cause explosion if electrical current is used for polypectomy and, therefore, must not be used for colonoscopic preparation.

Patients should fast for at least 6 hours prior to colonoscopy since sedation associated with the procedure decreases protective reflexes and raises the possibility of aspiration of gastric contents.

PATIENT-SPECIFIC ISSUES

Anticoagulant medications

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has published excellent guidelines for anticoagulant therapy. These are summarised in Table 28.2. In brief:

When to restart anticoagulation. There are few endoscopic data to guide practice and the decision depends partly upon the indication for anticoagulation (see Table 28.2). It is important to note that although most post-procedure bleeding occurs within 72 h of the procedure, delayed haemorrhage may occur up to 3 weeks after the procedure.

Table 28.2 The Amercian Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines on anticoagulants in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures

Acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the anticoagulated patient:

Procedure risk Condition risk for thromboembolism
High Low
High Discontinue warfarin 3–5 days before procedure Discontinue warfarin 3–5 days before procedure
Consider heparin while INR is below therapeutic level Reinstitute warfarin after procedure
Low No change in anticoagulation. Elective procedures should be delayed while INR is in supratherapeutic range
Aspirin and other non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use
In the absence of a preexisting bleeding disorder, endoscopic procedures may be performed in patients taking aspirin or other NSAIDs

INR = international normalised ratio.

From Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:672–5, with permission.

Antibiotic prophylaxis

There is very little scientific evidence to guide practice. Excellent guidelines are available from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, which are summarised in Table 28.3. In brief, endoscopic procedures can be divided into high and low risk of significant bacteraemia and patient factors can similarly be classed in terms of risk from bacteremia. Low-risk procedures (such as gastroscopy and colonoscopy with or without polypectomy) never mandate the use of antibiotics, but they may be used at the clinician’s discretion. High-risk patients (e.g. those with prosthetic heart valves, previous endocarditis, recent vascular graft) undergoing a high-risk procedure (such as oesophageal dilation or sclerosis of varices) used to require antibiotics but this is not longer recommended routinely. All other permutations of patient and procedure are guided by physician preference. When there is doubt, most clinicians take a pragmatic approach and give prophylactic antibiotics.

Table 28.3 The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines on management of antibiotics in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures

Patient condition Procedure contemplated Antibiotic prophylaxis
High risk:

Stricture dilation Recommended Variceal sclerotherapy   ERCP/obstructed biliary tree   Other endoscopic procedures, including EGD and colonoscopy (with or without biopsy/polypectomy), variceal ligation Prophylaxis optional Oesophageal stricture dilation Prophylaxis optional

Variceal sclerotherapy   Other endoscopic procedures, including oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy (with or without biopsy/polypectomy), variceal ligation Not recommended Low risk:

All endoscopic procedures Not recommended Obstructed bile duct ERCP Recommended Pancreatic cystic lesion ERCP, EUS-FNA Recommended Cirrhosis acute gastrointestinal bleed All endoscopic procedures Recommended Ascites, immunocompromised patient Stricture dilation Not recommended Variceal sclerotherapy Not recommended

Other endoscopic procedures, including EGD and colonoscopy (with or without biopsy/polypectomy), variceal ligation   All patients Percutaneous endoscopic feeding tube placement Recommended (parenteral cephalosporin or equivalent) Prosthetic joints All endoscopic procedures Not recommended Cardiac prophylaxis regimens (oral 1 h before, IM or IV 30 min before procedure) Amoxycillin by mouth or ampicillin IV: adult 2.0 g, child 50 mg/kg Penicillin allergic: clindamycin (adult 600 mg, child 20 mg/kg) or cephalexin or cefadroxil (adult 2.0 g, child 50 mg/kg), or azithromycin or clarithromycin (adult 500 mg, child 15 mg/kg), or cefazolin (adult 1.0 g, child 25 mg/kg IV or IM), or vancomycin (adult 1.0 g, child 10–20 mg/kg IV)

CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; ERCP = endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; EUS-FNA = endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration; IM = intramuscular; IV = intravenous.

From Hirota WK, Petersen K, Baron TH, et al. Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58:475–82, with permission.

Due to the high risk of significant infective complications, prophylactic antibiotics are recommended for all patients undergoing some specific endoscopic procedures. These are:

The choice of antibiotic should be dictated by protocols determined by the infectious diseases unit of the institution.

SUMMARY

Correct patient preparation is essential for safe and effective endoscopic procedures (Figure 28.1).

The issues that have to be considered are: