How to Interpret an ECG

Published on 21/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1225 times

Chapter 22 How to Interpret an ECG

ECG Interpretation: Big Picture and General Approach

This review chapter summarizes a systematic approach to ECG analysis. Accurate interpretation of ECGs requires thoroughness and care. You should cultivate a systematic method of reading ECGs that is applied in every case.

Many of the most common mistakes are errors of omission, specifically the failure to note certain subtle but critical findings. For example, overlooking a short PR interval may cause you to miss the important Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) pattern. Marked prolongation of the QT interval, a potential precursor of torsades de pointes (see Chapter 16) and sudden cardiac arrest (see Chapter 19), sometimes goes unnoticed. These and other major, and avoidable, pitfalls in ECG diagnosis are reviewed in Chapter 23.

Most experienced readers approach an ECG in several “takes.” First, they do an overall gestalt or “big picture” scan to get the “lay of the land.” Then they go over each of 14 features looking at single leads and various combinations. This process may be repeated and rechecked several times before a final interpretation emerges.

You will quickly refine your skills if you get in the habit of “testing hypotheses” in the context of a differential diagnosis. As an example, if you see sinus rhythm with apparent “group beating” patterns, you should ask yourself if they are a manifestation of blocked atrial premature beats (APBs) or of second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block. If the latter, is the block nodal or infranodal, or is it indeterminate in location based on the ECG?

As described here, you should do your reading with the computer analysis, if available, covered up, so as not to be biased. Computer interpretations are frequently incomplete and sometimes completely wrong. Once you have committed to your reading, take a look at the computer interpretation. Sometimes it will point out something you missed. Often, it will miss something you found.

Fourteen Specific ECG Features to Analyze

On every ECG, 14 features (parameters) should be analyzed. These features are listed in Box 22-1 and discussed in the following sections.

Rhythm

The basic heart rhythm(s) and rate(s) are usually summarized together (e.g., sinus bradycardia at a rate of 40 beats/min). The cardiac rhythm can almost always be described in one of the following four categories:

Recall that diagnosis of sinus rhythm requires the presence of discrete P waves that are always positive (upright) in lead II (and negative in aVR). Further, the rate should be physiologically appropriate. (Rarely, a right atrial tachycardia, originating near the sinus node, will mimic sinus rhythm—but the rate is usually faster and more constant than that of sinus tachycardia.)

Sometimes, the ECG will catch an abrupt change between two of the preceding mechanisms, for example, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation spontaneously converting to sinus rhythm.

Be particularly careful not to overlook hidden P waves. For example, these waves may be present in some cases of second- or third-degree AV block, atrial tachycardia (AT) with block, or blocked APBs. Also, whenever the ventricular rate is about 150 beats/min, always consider the possibility of 2:1 atrial flutter—in this instance, classic flutter waves are often hard to discern, or they may be mistaken for the P waves of AT or sinus tachycardia.

If you are unsure of the atrial or ventricular mechanism, give a differential diagnosis if possible. For example, you might say or write: “the rhythm appears to be atrial fibrillation with a noisy baseline, but MAT is not excluded.” If artifact precludes determining the rhythm with certainty, you should also state that and suggest a repeat ECG if indicated.

PR Interval

The normal PR interval (measured from the beginning of the P wave to the beginning of the QRS complex) is 0.12 to 0.2 sec. A uniformly prolonged PR interval is often referred to as first-degree AV block (see Chapter 17). A short PR interval with sinus rhythm and with a wide QRS complex and a delta wave is seen in the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) pattern. By contrast, a short PR interval with retrograde P waves (negative in lead II) generally indicates an ectopic (atrial or AV junctional) pacemaker.

R Wave Progression in Chest Leads

Inspect leads V1 to V6 to see if the normal increase in the R/S ratio occurs as you move across the chest (see Chapter 4). The term “poor” or, preferably, “slow” R wave progression (small or absent R waves in leads V1 to V3) refers to a finding that may be a sign of anterior myocardial infarction (MI), but may also be seen in many other settings, including: altered lead placement, LVH, chronic lung disease, left bundle branch block, and many other conditions in the absence of infarction.

The term reversed R wave progression is used to describe abnormally tall R waves in lead V1 that progressively decrease in amplitude. This pattern may occur with a number of conditions, including right ventricular hypertrophy, posterior (or posterolateral) infarction, and (in concert with a limb lead reversal pattern) dextrocardia.

Formulating an Interpretation

After you have analyzed the 14 ECG features, you should formulate an overall interpretation based on these details and the integration of these findings in a specific clinical context. The final ECG report usually consists of the following five sections:

For example, the ECG might show a prolonged QT/QTc interval and prominent U waves. The interpretation could be “Repolarization abnormalities consistent with drug effect or toxicity (sotalol, dofetilide, etc.) or hypokalemia. Clinical correlation suggested.”

Another ECG might show wide P waves, right axis deviation, and a tall R wave in lead V1 (see Fig. 22-1). The interpretation could be “Findings consistent with left atrial abnormality (enlargement) and right ventricular hypertrophy. This combination is highly suggestive of mitral stenosis.”

In yet a third case the overall interpretation might simply be “Within normal limits.”

As noted earlier, you should also formulate a statement comparing the present ECG with previous ECGs (when available). If none is available, then you should conclude: “No previous ECG for comparison available.”

Every ECG abnormality you identify should summon a list of differential diagnostic possibilities (see Chapter 24). You should search for an explanation of every abnormality found.

For example, if the ECG shows sinus tachycardia, you need to find the cause of the rapid rate. Is it a result of anxiety, fever, hyperthyroidism, chronic heart failure, hypovolemia, sympathomimetic drugs, alcohol withdrawal, or some other cause?

If you see signs of LVH, is the likely cause valvular heart disease, hypertensive heart disease, or cardiomyopathy?

In this way the interpretation of an ECG becomes an integral part of clinical diagnosis and patient care.

ECG Artifacts

The ECG, like any other electronic recording, is subject to numerous artifacts that may interfere with accurate interpretation. Some of the most common of these are described here.

60-Hertz (Cycle) Interference

Interference from alternating current generators produces the characteristic pattern shown in Figure 22-2. Notice the fine-tooth comb 60-hertz (Hz) artifacts. You can usually eliminate 60-Hz interference by switching the electrocardiograph plug to a different outlet or turning off other electrical appliances in the room.

Improper Standardization

The electrocardiograph, as mentioned, should be standardized before each tracing so that a 1-mV pulse produces a square wave 10 mm high (see Fig. 2-5). Failure to standardize properly results in complexes that are either spuriously low or spuriously high. Most ECG machines are left in their default mode of 10 mm/mV. However, be aware that electrocardiographs are usually equipped with half-standardization and double-standardization settings. As noted, unintentional recording of an ECG on either of these settings may also result in a misleading reading of “low” or “high” voltage.