History, development and current activity in coronary intervention

Published on 31/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1959 times

Chapter 1 History, development and current activity in coronary intervention

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

Cardiac catheterisation and coronary angiography

More than two decades have passed since Andreas Grüntzig (Fig. 1.1) first attempted the percutaneous relief of a coronary stenosis. This single event, representing the culmination of many years of experimentation, has now passed into legend. Percutaneous coronary revascularisation has emerged as a routine cardiac procedure, but the trials and tribulations of workers in the field of invasive cardiology, whose efforts led stepwise to that day in September 1977, are nevertheless worthy of review.

The era of invasive cardiac investigation and intervention began with the pioneering efforts of Forssman in 1929. The latter half of the previous century had seen Claude Bernard and later, Chaveau and Marey, develop the concept of ‘cardiac catheterisation’ in animal subjects employing intra-arterial or intravenous intubation in horses or dogs, but it was Forssman who demonstrated its feasibility and safety in humans. Taking advantage of his friendship with a nurse, Gerda Ditzen, he was able to cut down on his own cephalic vein and advance a rubber urethral catheter to his right atrium, documenting its progress with X-ray fluoroscopy. Right heart catheterisation was further developed with the work of Cournand and Ranges (1941), while investigation of the left heart proceeded via parasternal, subxiphoid, apical, suprasternal, transbronchial, papravertebral and transseptal approaches; until Zimmerman reported the results of retrograde left heart catheterisation in 1949.

Other developments also allowed cardiac catheterisation to progress to a stage recognisable in the present day. In 1953, Seldinger introduced his technique of entering arteries percutaneously. Serious peri-procedural cardiac arrhythmias could be addressed with closed chest cardiac compression (1960) and the introduction of direct current (DC) defibrillation by Lown in 1962. X-ray documentation had been limited to single plate exposures until the image intensifier coupled to film exposure at rapid frame rates resulted in the emergence of true cineangiography. Cardiac events could thereby be visualised in ‘real time’ incorporating less contrast volume and less radiation exposure to both patient and operator.

By the mid-1950s, visualisation of the coronary circulation had been achieved only by flush injection into the aortic root. A number of modifications to this technique were in use, including power injection into the sinus of Valsalva. It was during one such procedure in 1958, that an National Institute of Health (NIH) catheter inadvertently migrated into the right coronary artery and the subsequent injection of contrast opacified the vessel without the patient experiencing ill effects; Mason Sones had thereby demonstrated that selective coronary arteriography was possible. During the next few years, the first 1000 coronary angiograms were performed with only 2 deaths and a 2% incidence of ventricular fibrillation. Pre-formed polyethylene catheters were introduced in 1962 and were further modified by Judkins heralding the modern era of comprehensive percutaneous cardiac investigation.

Coronary angioplasty

Initial non-surgical attempts to address arterial obstruction focused on the peripheral circulation. Charles Dotter, together with Judkins in 1964, first reported a successful approach in leg arteries using co-axial sheaths to allow sequential dilatations. In an initial series of nine patients with severe perpheral ischaemia; six improved and four amputations were avoided. However, it was recognised that a better mechanical method of dilatation was required which exerted radial, rather than longitudinal force, on the vessel wall. A latex balloon was initially tried, but it was then appreciated that a non-elastic dilator was preferable. In 1974 Andreas Grüntzig developed a sausage-shaped polyvinyl chloride (PVC) balloon, mounted at the end of a catheter, which could be inflated to a predetermined diameter to exert a radial force of 3 to 5 atmospheres. This was initially used in the iliac and femoropopliteal system with satisfactory results, and was then extended to address disease in renal, basilar, coeliac and subclavian arteries.

Miniaturisation of this balloon system allowed it to be considered for coronary stenoses. Initial experiments in relieving mechanically produced strictures in canine coronaries, were reported in 1976. In May 1977, after careful planning, Grüntzig together with Richard Myler, decided to attempt balloon dilatation in a patient undergoing bypass surgery in San Francisco. During the operation, a balloon tipped catheter was passed retrogradely up the left anterior descending (LAD) artery from a distal arteriotomy. Following balloon expansion, no debris was produced downstream, and reinvestigation after surgery showed that vessel dilatation had been successful. A further 15 peri-operative cases were undertaken in San Francisco and Zurich before true percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was attempted in the human subject.

Gruntzig’s description of the first PTCA, performed in Zurich on 16 September 1977, was later quoted in an article by Hurst:

This first case was reported in a letter to The Lancet in 1978. In it, Grüntzig prophetically stated:

This technique, if it proves successful in long-term follow-up studies, may widen the indications for coronary angiography and provide another treatment for patients with angina pectoris.

A report of the first 50 cases was published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 1979, indicating success in 32 patients. Stenosis severity fell from 84% to 34%, with a reduction in the translesional pressure gradient from 58 to 19 mmHg. Seven patients required emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); there was a 5% incidence of myocardial infarction, but no procedural deaths. In a book prepared before his untimely death in 1985, Grüntzig wrote:

In September 1977, coronary revascularisation had entered a new era of rapidly advancing technology. The subsequent 20 years have seen the subspecialty of interventional cardiology become one of the most exciting and rewarding fields in modern medicine.

TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS

The procedure of coronary angioplasty, although modified over the last 20 years by enhanced technology, still conforms to the original descriptions of the technique (Figs. 1.2 and 1.3). Under radiographic control and local anaesthesia, the coronary arterial ostium is engaged with a guiding catheter and the target lesion traversed with an atraumatic guidewire. A balloon-tipped catheter is then advanced over the guidewire until it reaches the site of atheromatous obstruction, at which point the balloon is inflated with diluted contrast medium. The size of balloon, inflation pressure and the number and duration of inflations, varies according to the lesion characteristics. When the angiographic appearances suggest adequate lesion dilatation, all the equipment is removed and the patient is returned to the ward.

The original Grüntzig balloon material was PVC and of low compliance. It would rupture rather than exceed its designed maximal outer diameter. The catheter shaft incorporated a double lumen which allowed the balloon to be expanded and voided, and for pressure to be monitored at the catheter tip. Other than for a short-fixed guidewire, steerability was not possible. Balloon material limited inflation pressures to 5 atmospheres, the catheter shaft diameter was almost 5 French (F) (1.7 mm) and crossing profiles were high. The subsequent 15 years witnessed a rapid growth in technology resulting in marked improvements in guiding catheters and guidewires, as well as in balloon design.

Guiding catheters

Although coronary angioplasty represented an extension of diagnostic angiography, the construction of guiding catheters needed modification as these would need to support the passage of high profile and inflexible balloon catheters through tortuous vessels and across high-grade obstructions, rather than simply allow contrast injection. Initial examples had large outer diameters with poor memory and torque control. In the early 1980s, bonded, multilayer guiding catheters were developed comprising an inner surface of Teflon (to decrease friction), a middle layer of woven mesh (for torque control) and an outer layer of polyurethane (to maintain form). The variety of preformed shapes available for diagnostic work (Judkins, Amplatz), were reflected in the design of guides for interventional use, with many additional configurations to deal with atypical anatomy (e.g. Voda, Multipurpose, El Gamal, Hockey Stick).

Soft-tipped guides meant a reduced likelihood of catheter induced trauma to the coronary ostium, while thinner walls allowed increased internal lumens to incorporate other non-balloon devices. In the early 1980s, 9 or 10 F (3 or 3.3 mm diameter) guides were routinely used, but with advancing technology, notably in reducing the profiles of balloons and other devices, guiding catheter diameters came down in size. While in the early 1990s 8 F (2.7 mm) guides were commonplace; 7 and 6 F (2.3 or 2.0 mm) catheters are now increasingly employed. This results in less femoral arterial trauma and more rapid patient ambulation after the procedure, as well as allowing PTCA to be undertaken from alternative sites of vascular access, particularly the radial artery.

Balloon catheters

The balloon catheter itself has sustained a number of major modifications since its original design in 1977. A large variety of balloon lengths and expanded diameters became available, increasing the scope of possible lesions. Balloon material was also developed which could withstand far higher pressures (currently in excess of 20 atmospheres) and yet expand in a predictable fashion. Operators could choose from balloon materials with a range of compliance characteristics to suit particular lesion types. As balloon and shaft design improved, so did trackability and steerability, and as the crossing profile of the balloon reduced it became axiomatic that if a wire could cross the stenosis then so would the balloon catheter.

Balloon preparation was often problematical as the material did not collapse easily with aspiration and thus de-airing was frequently incomplete. Until the development of superior materials, this was overcome with a specific air venting tube which was integral in the Simpson–Roberts balloon catheter system.

The original fixed wire design re-emerged in the mid-1980s with the ‘balloon on a wire’ concept. This was particularly valuable for distal lesions, or cases when preservation of wire position or balloon exchange was considered not to be a priority. Erbel and Stack produced continuous perfusion balloons that allowed the anterograde flow of blood beyond the inflated balloon and could thereby limit ischaemia during long balloon inflations.

A milestone in balloon catheter development occurred in the 1986 with the introduction of the ‘monorail’ system by Bonzel. By only requiring a relatively short segment of guidewire to run through the distal catheter tip and shaft, lesions could be independently wired before selection of the balloon catheter, and balloon exchange was simplified. ‘Over the wire’ systems remained in limited use as they provided easier wire exchange (when occasionally required) and the ability to measure distal pressure. However, the emergence of superior fluoroscopy and digital X-ray systems with online quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), meant that operators could assess the results of angioplasty visually without having to rely on abolition of the translesional pressure gradient. Thus, in Europe, monorail systems represent the majority of activity while in the USA such ‘rapid exchange’ devices are more restricted by regulatory issues.

As the technique of PTCA necessarily incorporates the temporary occlusion of an epicardial coronary artery, it is not surprising that much research activity capitalised on this model of controlled myocardial ischaemia. A multitude of publications have emerged in the literature as a result of harnessing this therapeutic modality and thereby studying the effects of transient coronary occlusion in man. Examination of these effects has involved action potential changes, coronary sinus blood sampling, electrocardiographic and haemodynamic alteration, and analysis of ventricular contraction during balloon inflation employing echocardiography or contrast left ventriculography.

Such research has clarified the sequence of abnormalities occurring in left ventricular myocardium rendered ischaemic as a result of transient coronary occlusion. Initially diastolic dysfunction (abnormal relaxation and reduced compliance), is followed by systolic contractile changes indicated by hypokinesis, akinesis or dyskinesis of myocardial segments subtended by the treated artery. Electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities then develop, manifest as ST segment changes in leads overlying the ischaemic territories. Cardiac chest pain is a final and unpredictable occurrence in this cascade of ischaemic events all of which totally resolve in the reverse sequence when ischaemia is relieved. These ischaemic effects may be mitigated by collateral flow to the index artery, and there is now much interest surrounding the role of preconditioning in this setting.

These, and other technological advances steadily increased the scope of PTCA allowing a larger variety of lesions to be treated more successfully and with greater safety. Angioplasty had grown from a pioneering and unpredictable experiment to become a routine therapy for patients with coronary disease. A further breakthrough was to occur in 1987 which, in significance, was second only to Grüntzig’s pioneering efforts; this was the first implantation in man of an intracoronary stent (see Chapter 6).

WORLDWIDE ACTIVITY

Initial enthusiasm for PTCA resulted in an understandable rush to learn the technique. This prompted leaders in the field to convene a workshop in June 1979, in Bethesda, USA, under the auspices of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Here it was decided to limit the availability of PTCA to centres with clearly defined and agreed protocols. Even the commercial provider of the equipment agreed to abide by these guidelines such that operators could not obtain balloon catheters without having undergone approved instruction in the technique. Results of procedures were pooled in a unified and systematic fashion so that many of the first insights into PTCA and its outcomes derived from this NHLBI registry.

Between 1977 and 1982 data on 3079 patients were entered into the registry from 106 institutions. Of these patients, 77% were male with a mean age of 54 years, two-thirds having Canadian Heart Class III or IV symptoms. Almost three-quarters had single vessel disease, the LAD artery being the most commonly addressed. Left main stem disease was attempted in 1% and bypass graft dilatation performed in 4%.

At this early stage several drawbacks were apparent when PTCA was compared with coronary artery surgery. First, the initial and long-term results were unpredicatable and the definition of a successful procedure was uncertain; a 20% reduction in stenosis severity was achieved in 67% of the original registry. Secondly, the risks of PTCA were not clearly superior to surgery (myocardial infarction: 5.5%, emergency CABG: 6.6%, death: 0.9%) acknowledging that the majority had single vessel disease. Thirdly, it became apparent that a relatively small volume of procedures was being undertaken by an increasingly large number of operators thus potentially diluting an initially small experience. Finally, technical factors like vessel angulation or tortuosity, distal disease and lesion calcification, eccentricity or chronic occlusion, were anticipated to limit PTCA to perhaps 10 or 15% of patients considered for surgical revascularisation.

The technical advances in PTCA described in this chapter resulted in greater applicability of the procedure and thereby an exponential increase in activity. Emory University in Atlanta, where Grüntzig had undertaken much of his later work, was in the vanguard of interventional research. Their experience, reported in 1985, indicated a learning curve for the technique and improving results associated with increasing experience and the new emerging technology. For example, the circumflex artery became more accessible with steerable systems rising from 7% to 16% of all procedures and enjoying similar success rates as with the other main arteries. Their experience in 3500 consecutive cases set a standard to which other interventional units could aspire with success in 89%, myocardial infarction in 2.6%, emergency CABG in 2.7% and death in 0.1% of patients.

The growth in activity has been seen worldwide, with the USA particularly generating large volumes. It is interesting to note that ten years after the first report of coronary artery bypass grafting in 1968, 100,000 operations had been performed in the USA. However this figure had been overtaken by the number of PTCA procedures (106000) undertaken within only seven years of its first reported series in 1978. Recent UK data suggest that CABG rates may now be on the decline as PTCA activity continues to increase (Fig. 1.4).

In 1995, there were an estimated 350 000 PTCA cases performed in the USA, with almost 500 000 undertaken worldwide. In Europe, activity has been similarly increasing from approximately 250 000 in 1995, to almost 300 000 in 1997. Individual European countries differ in interventional activity and thus in the PTCA rates per million of the population (Fig. 1.5). Growth in activity in the UK, although substantial, nevertheless lags behind that of other European countries like France, Germany and Belgium. This discrepancy in the UK compared with other Western European nations is primarily a funding issue within the National Health Service (NHS). A lack of resources limits the number of patients coming forward for angiographic investigation, and thereby the number available for revascularisation with CABG as well as PTCA.

In the UK, data on PTCA activity is collected by the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) on an annual basis. Input from participating centres has been voluntary, but nevertheless the volumes recorded have always been in concordance with those suggested by industry sources when equipment sales have been examined. Thus in 1991, 52 centres in the UK undertook 9933 PTCA procedures representing 174 cases per million population. The annual growth in activity has varied between approximately 12% and 19%, the average since 1991 being 15% per year. In 2006, a total of 91 centres reported almost 74 000 procedures, giving a rate per million of 1216 (Fig. 1.6).