


1. Anemia Secondary to Maturation Defects or Underproduction
a. Iron Deficiency Anemia
Etiology






Diagnosis
H&P

Labs



Treatment

b. Cobalamin (Vitamin B12) Deficiency
Etiology


Diagnosis
H&P

Labs



Treatment


Clinical Pearl

c. Folate Deficiency
Etiology

Diagnosis


FIGURE 7-1 Algorithm for diagnosis of anemia. (From Goldman L, Schafer AI [eds]: Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2012.)
Treatment



d. Inflammatory Anemia (Anemia of Chronic Disease [ACD])
Etiology






Diagnosis
Labs


TABLE 7-1
Lab Differentiation of Microcytic Anemias
Abnormality | Ferritin | Serum iron | TIBC | RDW |
Iron deficiency | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ |
Inflammatory anemia | N/↑ | ↓ | ↓ | N |
Sideroblastic anemia | N/↑ | ↑ | N | N |
Thalassemia | N/↑ | N/↑ | N/↓ | N/↑ |
Treatment


e. Sideroblastic Anemia
Etiology


Diagnosis
Labs



Treatment



2. Acquired Hemolytic Anemia
a. Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA)
Etiology



Diagnosis
H&P






Labs


Imaging


Treatment



b. Microangiopathic Hemolytic Anemia
Differential Diagnosis




Labs


Treatment


c. Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH)
Diagnosis








H&P

Treatment


d. Hemolytic Transfusion Reaction
Acute Hemolytic Transfusion Reaction (AHTR)
Physical Exam and Clinical Findings

Treatment

Delayed Hemolytic Transfusion Reaction (DHTR)
Physical Exam and Clinical Findings

Treatment

3. Congenital Hemolytic Anemias
a. Sickle Cell Syndrome
Diagnosis
H&P









Labs





Imaging





Treatment










b. Thalassemia
β-Thalassemia





α-Thalassemia





H&P
β-Thalassemia



α-Thalassemia




Diagnosis
Labs: β-Thalassemia




Labs: α-Thalassemia
Treatment


c. Glucose-6 Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) Deficiency
Etiology


Diagnosis
H&P

Labs


Treatment

d. Hereditary Spherocytosis
Etiology


Diagnosis
H&P

Labs



Treatment

B. Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes
1. Aplastic Anemia
Diagnosis
Labs




Treatment


2. Pure Red Cell Aplasia (PRCA)
Etiology


Diagnosis



Treatment



3. Thrombocytopenia
Etiology





Diagnosis
Diagnostic Approach (Fig. 7-2)


Labs



4. Neutropenia
Etiology


FIGURE 7-2 Evaluation of thrombocytopenia. (From Goldman L, Schafer AI [eds]: Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2012.)


Diagnosis


C. Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Classification

TABLE 7-2
French-American-British Classification Chart
Subtype | Abbreviation | Peripheral Blood | Bone Marrow |
Refractory anemia | RA | Blasts <1% | Blasts <5% |
Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts | RARS | Blasts <1% | Blasts <5%, and >15% ringed sideroblasts |
Refractory anemia with excess blasts | RAEB | Blasts <5% | Blasts 5%-20% |
Refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation | RAEB-T | Blasts >5% | Blasts 20%-30% or Auer rods |
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia | CMML | Monocytes >1 × 109/L | Any of the above |
Acute myelogenous leukemia | AML | Blasts >30% |
From Hoffman R et al: Hematology, basic principles and practice, ed 5, Philadelphia 2009, Churchill Livingston.
Diagnosis
H&P


Labs

Treatment
Prognosis



D. Myeloproliferative Disorders
1. Polycythemia Vera
Diagnosis (Fig. 7-3)
Clinical Presentation


FIGURE 7-3 Diagnostic algorithm for polycythemia vera (P. vera). (From Goldberger E: Treatment of Cardiac Emergencies, 5th ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 1990.)


PE



Labs







Treatment



Prognosis


2. Essential Thrombocythemia
Epidemiology and Presentation




Diagnosis

Treatment



3. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Three Major Phases
Chronic Phase (Months to Years)


Accelerated Phase







Blast Crisis

Diagnosis
H&P

Labs



Treatment


4. Primary Myelofibrosis
Epidemiology and Presentation



Diagnosis



Treatment
5. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Diagnosis
H&P


Labs



Treatment



Clinical Pearl

6. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Diagnosis
H&P



Labs




Treatment






E. Multiple Myeloma and Related Disorders
1. Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Diagnosis




H&P








Labs









Imaging



Treatment








2. Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)
Diagnostic Criteria



Treatment


3. Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia
Diagnosis
H&P





Diagnostic Criteria

Labs





Treatment


4. AL Amyloidosis
Diagnosis


H&P


Treatment

F. Lymphoid Malignancies
1. Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Diagnosis
H&P




Labs


Imaging







TABLE 7-3
WHO Classification of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
B-Cell Lymphomas | |
Precursor B-cell lymphoma | Precursor B lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia |
Mature B-cell lymphoma | Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma Splenic marginal zone lymphoma Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) Nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma Follicular lymphoma Mantle cell lymphoma Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma Primary effusion lymphoma Burkitt’s lymphoma/leukemia |
T/NK-Cell Lymphomas | |
Precursor T-cell lymphoma | Precursor T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma Blastic NK-cell lymphoma |
Mature T/NK-cell lymphoma | Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type Enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma Mycosis fungoides Sézary’s syndrome Primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma |
Adapted from Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW (eds): World Health Organization Classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetics. Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyons, France, IARC Press, 2001.
Treatment and Prognosis
2. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
Definition

TABLE 7-4
Ann Arbor Staging System for Lymphomas
Stage∗ | Cotswold Modification of Ann Arbor Classification |
I | Involvement of a single lymph node region or lymphoid structure |
II | Involvement of two or more lymph node regions on the same side of the diaphragm (the mediastinum is considered a single site, whereas the hilar lymph nodes are considered bilaterally); the number of anatomic sites should be indicated by a subscript (e.g., II3) |
III | Involvement of lymph node regions on both sides of the diaphragm: III1 (with or without involvement of splenic hilar, celiac, or portal nodes) and III2 (with involvement of para-aortic, iliac, and mesenteric nodes) |
IV | Involvement of one or more extranodal sites in addition to a site for which the designation E has been used |
∗ All cases are subclassified to indicate the absence (A) or presence (B) of the systemic symptoms of significant fever (>38.0° C [100.4° F]), night sweats, and unexplained weight loss exceeding 10% of normal body weight within the previous 6 mo. The clinical stage (CS) denotes the stage as determined by all diagnostic examinations and a single diagnostic bx only. In the Ann Arbor classification, the term pathologic stage (PS) is used if a second bx of any kind has been obtained, whether negative or positive. In the Cotswold modification, the PS is determined by laparotomy; X designates bulky disease (widening of the mediastinum by more than one third or the presence of a nodal mass >10 cm), and E designates involvement of a single extranodal site that is contiguous or proximal to the known nodal site.
From Hoffman R, Benz EJ, Shattil SJ, et al (eds): Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice, 5th ed. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 2009.
TABLE 7-5
Combination Chemotherapy Regimens for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Regimen | Dose | Days of Administration | Frequency |
CHOP-R | Every 21 days | ||
Cyclophosphamide | 750 mg/m2 IV | 1 | |
Doxorubicin | 50 mg/m2 IV | 1 | |
Vincristine | 1.4 mg/m2 IV∗ | 1 | |
Prednisone, fixed dose | 100 mg PO | 1-5 | |
Rituximab | 375 mg/m2 IV | 1 | |
CVP-R | Every 21 days | ||
Cyclophosphamide | 1,000 mg/m2 IV | 1 | |
Vincristine | 1.4 mg/m2 IV∗ | 1 | |
Prednisone, fixed dose | 100 mg PO | 1-5 | |
Rituximab | 375 mg/m2 IV | 1 | |
FCR | Every 28 days | ||
Fludarabine | 25 mg/m2 IV | 1-3 | |
Cyclophosphamide | 250 mg/m2 IV | 1-3 | |
Rituximab | 375 mg/m2 | 1 |
∗ Vincristine dose often capped at 2 mg total.
From Goldman L, Schafer AI (eds): Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2012.
TABLE 7-6
International Prognostic Index for Aggressive Lymphomas∗
Risk Group | IPI Score | CR Rate (%) | 5-Yr Overall Survival (%) |
Low | 0, 1 | 87 | 73 |
Low intermediate | 2 | 67 | 51 |
High intermediate | 3 | 55 | 43 |
High | 4, 5 | 44 | 26 |
CR, Complete response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IPI, International Prognostic Index.
∗ One point is given for the presence of each of the following characteristics: age >60 yr, elevated serum LDH level, ECOG performance status ≥2, Ann Arbor stage III or IV, and >2 extranodal sites.
From Hoffman R, Benz EJ, Shattil SJ, et al (eds): Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice, 5th ed. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 2009.
Diagnosis
H&P

Labs
Staging (Table 7-7)

TABLE 7-7
Rai Staging Systems in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Lymphocytosis | Lymphadenopathy | Hepatomegaly or Splenomegaly | Hemoglobin (g/dL) | Platelets × 103/μL | |
Rai Stage | |||||
0 | + | − | − | ≥11 | ≥100 |
I | + | + | − | ≥11 | ≥100 |
II | + | ± | + | ≥11 | ≥100 |
III | + | ± | ± | <11 | ≥100 |
IV | + | ± | ± | Any | <100 |
From Goldman L, Bennett JC (eds): Cecil Textbook of Medicine, 21st ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2000.
Treatment



3. Hairy Cell Leukemia
Definition

Diagnosis
H&P

Labs




Treatment

4. Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Diagnosis
H&P






Labs

Staging and Prognostic Risk Factors







Treatment









G. Bleeding Disorders
1. Evaluation of Suspected Bleeding Disorder
2. Hemophilia
Diagnosis





Treatment
Hemophilia A



Hemophilia B

3. Von Willebrand’s Disease (vWD)

FIGURE 7-4 Differential diagnosis of bleeding disorders. ∗In many labs, “bleeding time” is no longer available and has been replaced with PFA-100. (From Cluster JW, Rau, RE: The Harriet Lane Handbook, 18th ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 2009.)
Diagnosis
H&P


Labs





Treatment


4. Coagulopathy of Liver Disease




5. Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)
Etiology










Diagnosis







Treatment





6. Vitamin K Deficiency
Etiology

Lab

Treatment

H. Platelet Disorders
1. Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
Etiology

Diagnosis
H&P



Labs



Imaging

Treatment








2. Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)
Diagnosis and Treatment


TABLE 7-8
A Diagnostic and Treatment Approach to Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
Suspicion of HIT Based upon the “4 Ts” | Score | Pretest Probability Score Criteria | ||
2 | 1 | 0 | ||
Thrombocytopenia | ![]() |
Nadir 20-100, or >50% platelet fall | Nadir 10-19, or 30%-50% platelet fall | Nadir <10, or <30% platelet fall |
Timing of onset of platelet fall | ![]() |
Day 5-10, or ≤ day 1 with recent heparin∗ | > Day 10 or timing unclear (but fits with HIT) | ≤ Day 1 (no recent heparin) |
Thrombosis or other sequelae | ![]() |
Proven thrombosis, skin necrosis, or ASR† | Progressive, recurrent, or silent thrombosis; erythematous skin lesions | None |
OTher cause of platelet fall | ![]() |
None evident | Possible | Definite |
Total Pretest Probability Score | ![]() |
Periodic reassessment as new information can change pretest probability (e.g., positive blood cultures) |
Total Pretest Probability Score | ||
High | Moderate | Low |
8 | 7 | 6 | 5 |4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Stop heparin‡, give alternative nonheparin anticoagulant argatroban¶ or lepirudin# or danaparoid∗∗ (or bivalirudin†† or fondaparinux‡‡) | Physician judgment | Continue (LMW) heparin |
Positive test for HIT antibodies: continue nonheparin anticoagulant until platelet count recovery | ![]() ![]() |
Negative test for HIT antibodies: consider continuing or switching back to (LMW) heparin## |
Thrombosis∗∗∗ If HIT, continue nonheparin anticoagulant until platelet count recovery, then cautious coumarin overlap¶¶ |
![]() ![]() |
No thrombosis If HIT, consider anticoagulating until platelet count recovery, even if no thrombosis apparent (± coumarin¶¶) |
∗ Recent heparin indicates exposure within the past 30 days (2 points) or past 30-100 days (1 point).
† ASR, acute systemic reaction following IV heparin bolus (see Table 7-4).
‡ Stop all heparin, including catheter “flushes” and possibly heparin-coated catheters.
¶ Argatroban: approved (U.S., Canada) for isolated HIT and HIT complicated by thrombosis (2 μg/kg/min IV, adjusted to 1.5-3.0× patient’s baseline APTT or the mean of the laboratory normal range); reduce dose for hepatobiliary compromise: may increase INR more than the other direct thrombin inhibitors, thus requiring care in managing coumarin overlap (see footnote ¶¶).
# Lepirudin: approved (United States, Canada, European Union, elsewhere) for treatment of thrombosis complicating HIT (±0.4 mg/kg IV bolus, then 0.15 mg/kg/hr adjusted to 1.5-2.5× patient’s baseline APTT or mean of the laboratory normal range); used (off-label) also to treat isolated HIT (0.1 mg/kg/hr, adjusted by APTT); to avoid overdosing and anaphylaxis, it may be preferable to omit the bolus, and begin as IV infusion (except when facing life- or limb-threatening thrombosis); reduce dose for renal insufficiency.
∗∗ Danaparoid: usual IV bolus, 2250 U (body weight 60-75 kg) followed by infusion (400 U/hr for 4 hr, then 300 U/hr for 4 hr, then 200 U/hr, adjusted by anti–factor Xa levels); this therapeutic-dose regimen is appropriate both for isolated HIT and for HIT complicated by thrombosis (although the dose is higher than approved in some jurisdictions); withdrawn from U.S. market (2002).
†† Bivalirudin: no bolus, IV infusion 0.15 mg/kg/hr adjusted by APTT; limited experience (off-label).
‡‡ Fondaparinux: dosing for HIT not established; limited experience (off-label).
¶¶ Delay coumarin pending substantial platelet count recovery (at least >100, preferably >150); begin coumarin in low doses, with at least 4-5 day overlap, stopping alternative anticoagulant when INR therapeutic for 2 days and platelets recovered.
## Depending on physician confidence in the laboratory’s ability to rule out HIT antibodies (usually, negative PF4-dependent enzyme immunoassay and/or washed platelet activation assay performed by an experienced laboratory).
∗∗∗ Some thrombi may require special treatment (e.g., thrombectomy for large limb artery thrombosis).
††† Routine ultrasound of lower limb veins recommended because many pts w/HIT have subclinical DVT.
Adapted from Warkentin TE, Aird WC, Rand JH: Platelet-endothelial interactions: sepsis, HIT, and antiphospholipid syndrome. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 497-519, 2003.
3. Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)
Etiology



Diagnosis
H&P




Labs






Treatment


4. Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome (HUS)
Definition
Diagnosis
H&P

Labs



Treatment


5. HELLP Syndrome



Diagnosis
H&P

Treatment



I. Thrombotic Disorders
1. Hypercoagulable State
Etiology (Table 7-9)
Inherited





TABLE 7-9
Hypercoagulable Conditions
Prevalence in General Population (%) | Prevalence in Population with Thrombosis (%) | A/V Events | Relative Risk of Thrombosis | |
FVL mutation | 5% of whites; rare in nonwhites | 12%-40% | V | Heterozygous: 3-7 Homozygous: 80 |
Prothrombin G20210A mutation | 3% of whites; rare in nonwhites | 6%-18% | V | 3 |
AT deficiency | 0.02% | 1%-3% | V | 20-50 |
PC deficiency | 0.2%-0.4% | 3%-5% | V | 7-15 |
PS deficiency | 0.03%-0.1% | 1%-5% | V | 5-11 |
Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome | 1%-2% | 5%-21% | V + A | 2-11 |
Hyperhomocysteinemia | 5%-7% | 10% | V + A | 3 |
Elevated factor VIII level | 11% | 25% | 5 |
A, Arterial; AT, antithrombin; FVL, factor V Leiden; PC, protein C; PS, protein; V, venous.
From Ferri F: Ferri’s Clinical Advisor 2010. Philadelphia, Mosby, 2010.


Acquired




2. Antiphospholipid Syndrome
Diagnosis

Clinical Features


Labs


Treatment





3. Venous Thromboembolism (DVT)
Diagnosis
H&P




Labs


TABLE 7-10
Wells’ Clinical Assessment Model for the Pretest Probability of Lower Extremity DVT
Score | |
Active cancer (treatment ongoing or within previous 6 mo or palliative) | 1 |
Paralysis, paresis, or recent plaster immobilization of the lower extremities | 1 |
Recently bedridden >3 days or major surgery within 4 wk | 1 |
Localized tenderness along the distribution of the deep venous system | 1 |
Entire leg swollen | 1 |
Calf swelling >3 cm asymptomatic side (measured 10 cm below tibial tuberosity) | 1 |
Pitting edema confined to the symptomatic leg | 1 |
Collateral superficial veins (nonvaricose) | 1 |
Alternative diagnosis as likely as or greater than that of DVT | −2 |
In patients with symptoms in both legs, the more symptomatic leg is used. Pretest probability is calculated as the total score: high, >3; moderate, 1-2; low, <0.
From Crawford MH, DiMarco JP, Paulus WJ (eds): Cardiology, 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 2004.
Imaging


FIGURE 7-5 Integrated strategy for diagnosis of DVT by using clinical probability assessment, measurement of D-dimer, and ultrasonography of legs as primary diagnostic tests. If clinical probability is low (i.e., DVT unlikely and D-dimer negative), no further investigations are required. If D-dimer is positive, proceed to ultrasonography of legs; then either treat or stop investigations. If clinical probability is high (i.e., DVT likely), D-dimer measurement need not be carried out; proceed directly to ultrasonography of legs. If negative, options are to repeat ultrasound in 1 week or in some cased to perform an ascending venogram. (From Vincent JL, Abraham E, Moore FA, et al [eds]: Textbook of Critical Care, 6th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2011.)
Treatment






Duration of Anticoagulant Rx



Anticoagulation Monitoring



Anticoagulation Reversal



Direct Thrombin Inhibitors


J. Oncologic Urgencies and Emergencies
1. Tumor Lysis Syndrome
Treatment
2. Superior Vena Cava Syndrome
Definition
Diagnosis
H&P


Imaging



Treatment




3. Brain Metastases
Epidemiology and Physical Findings



Imaging and Labs



Treatment



