154 Hematologic Malignancies in the Intensive Care Unit
Emergency Management of Hematologic Malignancies in the Intensive Care Unit
Emergency Diagnosis
Clinical Situations Requiring Urgent Chemotherapy
A small number of patients are admitted directly to ICUs with life-threatening complications1 and require emergency chemotherapy because of specific organ involvement and respiratory, kidney, neurologic, or liver injury. In these cases, chemotherapy must be initiated in the ICU along with the hematologist consultant. From the intensivist’s point of view, emergency chemotherapy may be indicated in seven main clinical situations, independent of the absolute circulating blast counts:
Emergency Chemotherapy in Leukemias
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Classic induction therapy is based on a 7-day course of steroids alone, followed by a combination of prednisone, vincristine, and an anthracycline (daunorubicin in most studies), with or without the addition of cyclophosphamide.4–6 In cases of compressive emergency or high tumor burden, progressive steroid therapy should be prescribed first (beginning with 0.5 mg/kg prednisone for the first dose); patients with high tumor burden should be carefully monitored because they can rapidly develop a severe acute tumor lysis syndrome (ATLS).7–10
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
The main complication of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is DIC, with early mortality essentially related to hemorrhages located in the CNS.11 Nevertheless, although leukostasis in APL is almost never a problem because these patients are usually pancytopenic, their leukemia should be considered (and treated) as hyperleukocytic APL as soon as the WBC count is higher than 5000/mm3. “Variant” type AML3 can be misleading, because patients are not always cytopenic, but they can display true hyperleukocytosis, sometimes greater than 100,000 cells/mm3.
Although APL is remarkably sensitive to anthracyclines, emergency treatment of APL with severe coagulation disorder now relies on early administration of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA).12,13 There is no indication for progressive dosing of this drug, which should be prescribed immediately at 45 mg/m2/d in two oral doses taken at 12-hour intervals. Initial worsening of the DIC is the rule, and patients should receive abundant transfusion support to ensure a platelet count above 50,000/mm3 and at least 1.5 g/L of fibrinogen at all times. ATRA is available only in sealed, thick-walled, hardly soluble capsules that contain an oil-based solution. No parenteral form is available. Therefore, administration of ATRA is problematic through nasogastric tubes in mechanically ventilated patients; there is currently no other way than piercing the capsule, emptying its content, and carefully resuspending it in oil to allow injection into a gastric tube.
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Other Than Promyelocytic Leukemia
Urgent induction is derived from the classic reference treatment, a combination of 3 days of an anthracycline (classically daunorubicin, but idarubicin is one of the many possible alternatives) with 7 days of cytarabine.4,14 The difference is that the scheme of administration is progressive: daunorubicin should be administered alone and at half the usual dose (20-25 mg/m2/d for a total of 6 days, equivalent to the 3 days of the standard full-dose regimen) before the continuous infusion of cytarabine (200 mg/m2/d for 7 days) is started on day 3 or 4.
Specific Precautions for Leukemic Pulmonary Infiltration
Acute respiratory failure revealing a leukemia is rare, but intensivists should be aware that respiratory failure with bilateral consolidation can reveal nonhyperleukocytic monocytic leukemias (AML5).2 This condition should be recognized promptly because it appears to be associated with a high risk of rapid respiratory deterioration after initiation of chemotherapy. However, this should not be viewed as a hopeless complication of a rapidly fatal disease. On the contrary, these patients should receive early invasive or noninvasive ventilatory support and immediate chemotherapy, even if they are not hyperleukocytic and their respiratory impairment is still moderate. The induction treatment is based on low-dose daunorubicin alone (20-25 mg/m2/d) for 2 to 3 days, followed by the introduction of cytarabine. Aggressive supportive care should be initiated in case of respiratory deterioration, because in our experience, 50% of these patients can survive these difficult inductions. It should be noted that blood gas analysis is useless in hyperleukocytic leukemia, since activated blast cells consume oxygen, so oxygen tension rapidly decreases in the syringe.
The Role of Leukapheresis
Therapeutic leukapheresis has been reported to be of benefit for patients with AML who have high WBC counts, and it is routinely used in some centers for acute hyperleukocytic leukemia.15 However, controversial data have been published, and the results suggest that despite a potential reduction in early mortality, there is no overall improvement in long-term survival.16–18 Optimal supportive care based on hyperhydration, hypouricemic drugs, and prompt induction yields similar results, whether preceded or not by a single oral dose of 2 to 4 g of hydroxyurea, without the complications inherent to the leukapheresis procedure. Based on currently available literature and the fact that this technique is not available 24 hours a day or during weekends in most centers, we cannot recommend its use for unstable ICU patients, and chemotherapy-based cytoreduction protocols should be the first choice. In our experience, leukapheresis should be reserved for failure to decrease blast cells in the presence of clinical symptoms of leukostasis.
Emergency Treatment of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas
Emergency initiation of chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHLs) can be necessary in the following clinical situations1:
In these cases, initiation of chemotherapy may be required before exhaustive assessment of the disease has been completed, or even before definitive typing of the lymphoma has been established, thus complicating the therapeutic choices.19 Nevertheless, most of these life-threatening complications occur in the setting of aggressive large-cell lymphomas, and the important point is not to choose the optimal protocol for a specific NHL but to be efficient in ensuring survival with limited toxicity in these patients with compromised respiratory, cardiac, renal, or hepatic functions.
All of these patients should receive adequate preventive treatment for ATLS, and they should be closely monitored for the occurrence of this syndrome during the first 3 days.7–9
Burkitt’s Lymphomas
The risk of an overwhelming ATLS is so high in patients with Burkitt’s lymphomas that steroids alone should be administered first and in increasing doses. Most protocols recommend that known or suspected Burkitt’s lymphomas with high tumor burden be treated with a cytoreductive course of chemotherapy before full-dose chemotherapy is administered.20–23 The consensual choice is to deliver a first initial dose of 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg of methylprednisolone, with the following dose administered 8 to 12 hours later if no uncontrolled metabolic disorder related to an ATLS is observed. In “steroid responders,” lysis will be obvious on biological criteria, especially the elevation of LDH, even in the absence of an obvious ATLS. Dosing should then be increased to 1 mg/kg/d on day 2, before infusion of one dose of vincristine and one dose of cyclophosphamide (dosing specified below) on day 2 or 3, depending on the response to steroids. If no sign of lysis occurs after two doses of steroids (as revealed by stable LDH levels), the addition of one dose of vincristine is usually sufficient to initiate a spectacular response. The cyclophosphamide dose is delivered on the following day if the ATLS is controlled. We recommend prophylactic hemodialysis in patients without kidney injury but with hyperphosphatemia before any chemotherapy of steroid therapy. Indeed, if the use of rasburicase has dramatically decreased the risk for uratic nephropathy, nephrocalcinosis remains a potential complication that can be prevented only by lowering blood phosphate levels.
Threatening Non-Burkitt’s, Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas
With the exception of confirmed or suspected Burkitt’s lymphomas (which require smaller doses of steroids on day 1), treatment of bulky NHLs should be started with steroids at 1 mg/kg/d of methylprednisolone or equivalent on day 1 and completed as early as day 2 with vincristine (1 mg/m2 once, maximum total dose 2 mg, in the absence of severe preexisting peripheral neuropathy) and cyclophosphamide (500-700 mg/m2) on day 2 in the absence of uncontrolled ATLS.20–22
Central Nervous System Involvement
Patients with NHL of the CNS who display focal deficits, alterations of the level of consciousness, or seizures should receive emergency steroid therapy with at least 2 mg/kg/d of methylprednisolone or equivalent. Optimal dosing is controversial in the literature, and doses ranging from 2 to 4 mg/kg/d can be considered appropriate. Administration of high-dose methotrexate, a key drug in the treatment of CNS NHL, is not necessary in an emergency situation and requires normal renal and liver functions.3,24
Emergency Treatment of Hodgkin’s Disease
HD is not a steroid-sensitive disease, no single drug is rapidly efficient, and no recommendation is available in the literature regarding urgent cytoreduction in HD. Therefore, if a decision for emergency chemotherapy is made, a standard combination may be recommended: bleomycin, 10 units/m2; vinblastine, 6 mg/m2; doxorubicin, 25 mg/m2; and dacarbazine, 375 mg/m2—all administered on day 1 in the absence of cardiac or pulmonary contraindications.25–27
Blastic Meningitis
Although prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy is required in all patients with ALL or hyperleukocytic AML, very few patients require urgent intrathecal chemotherapy (coma, seizures, cauda equina syndromes).3 Therefore, specialized consultation should always be obtained before administering any intrathecal chemotherapy, even in the presence of highly suggestive symptoms such as peripheral radicular pains or deficits or hyposensitivity or dysesthesia of the chin (infiltration of the dental nerve). In addition, lumbar puncture, even for exploratory purposes, is contraindicated in patients with hyperleukocytosis, to prevent any seeding of the cerebrospinal fluid with blasts during the procedure, and in those patients with marked DIC. Moreover, intensivists should be aware that some cases of ATLS have been described after therapeutic lumbar punctures.
Organ Failures Related To Hemophagocytic Syndrome
Severe hemophagocytic syndrome is now well recognized as a common presenting feature in NHL and HD.28–30 In many cases, organ failures are related to the intensity of the histiocytic activation and not to the invasiveness of the lymphoma itself, which can have a very low tumor burden, making the etiologic diagnosis all the more difficult. The clinical course of these patients is generally fulminant, especially once ICU admission is required.31,32 The clinical presentation is confounding—it precisely mimics septic shock with fever, chills, vasoplegic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and oliguric renal failure—but severe pancytopenia, high blood transfusion requirements, organomegaly, lymph node enlargement, and hepatic dysfunction several days or weeks before the occurrence of this pseudoseptic shock should suggest the diagnosis of severe hemophagocytic syndrome.33 Biological features such as elevated serum ferritin and hypertriglyceridemia are precious but inconstant markers of the disease, and the identification of hemophagocytosis on marrow smears or in lymph node or hepatic biopsy samples sometimes requires an experienced cytologist. The 2004 criteria for the diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis are listed in Box 154-1.33
Box 154-1
Diagnostic Criteria for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis*
Adapted from Janka GE. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Hematology 2005;10:104-7.
If sufficient clinical and biological elements are highly suggestive of the diagnosis, treatment should be promptly administered to allow emergency control of cytokine-induced organ failures. Treatment of the underlying lymphoma itself can be postponed for 2 or 3 days if the diagnosis is not yet confirmed, until urgent processing and reading of smears or biopsies have been conducted. No randomized trial of chemotherapy has been conducted in lymphoma-related hemophagocytic syndrome, so no consensus is available in the literature regarding the optimal strategy. However, etoposide-based regimens seem to be the most appropriate choice for these high-risk patients,33,34 frequently in combination with steroids. Based on case reports and our experience, administration of 150 to 200 mg of etoposide, depending on the severity of the renal and hepatic failures, combined with 1 to 2 mg/kg/d of methylprednisolone, is rapidly effective in most cases (within 12-48 hours). The effect is only transient, and recurrence of the initial symptoms is the rule within 6 to 10 days in the absence of a specific treatment of the lymphoma, which should be started by a hematologist as soon as the lymphoma has been identified. If an aggressive NHL is highly suspected on preliminary results of smears (lymph node, marrow, or pleural effusion), a nonspecific cytoreductive combination of steroid, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide can be administered while awaiting the definitive results of the cytologic, histologic, and immunochemistry techniques.
Management of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation
DIC is a common and serious complication of hematologic malignancies, but most of the time the bleeding is only moderately threatening, with mainly mucosal and cutaneous hemorrhagic manifestations.35 In fact, DIC is often triggered by the initiation of chemotherapy in several types of ALLs and AMLs (AML4, AML5, and to a lesser extent AML1). However, severe forms of coagulation disorders are typically observed as a presenting symptom in untreated acute promyelocytic leukemias (APL or AML3), frequently combining DIC and a severe hyperfibrinolytic state.13,36 Optimal treatment includes both symptomatic measures to reduce the risk of life-threatening hemorrhage (in the CNS but also in lungs and gastrointestinal tract) and specific treatment of the leukemia.
Supportive care is essential in DIC and should include repeated platelet transfusions to reach a minimum platelet count greater than 50,000/mm3 permanently; correction of the prothrombin time and of hypofibrinogenemia with fresh frozen plasma (2-4 units to start with) to ensure a prothrombin time less than 2.5 times normal; and a fibrinogen level greater than 1 g/L before the start of the treatment.37 The use of low-dose unfractionated heparin (100 International Units/kg/d) is controversial, requires platelet counts permanently superior to 50,000/mm3, and cannot be recommended for patients with active bleeding.12,36,38,39 Its prescription in DIC with thrombotic tendencies should be discussed according to local protocols. As soon as appropriate transfusion support is initiated, chemotherapy should be started, always with progressive dosing, to reduce the leukemic load as quickly as possible. Transient worsening of DIC is common and justifies intensification of transfusions as required by biological and clinical manifestations.
In DIC caused by hematologic malignancies, the use of antithrombin III cannot be recommended based on currently available data, with the exception of severe DICs occurring after infusion of L-asparaginase.40–42 In uncontrolled and life-threatening bleeding in nonhematology patients, the adjunctive use of recombinant factor VIIa has yielded some response, but this treatment has never been evaluated in the peculiar case of hematologic malignancies, and further well-designed evaluation of this molecule in severe malignancy-related DIC is needed to recommend its use in hematology patients.43–47
Multiple Myeloma and Other Causes of Hyperviscosity Syndromes
Severe infectious complications and metabolic emergencies (e.g., hypercalcemia, acute renal failure) can lead myeloma patients to the ICU, and these conditions are detailed elsewhere in this text. Myeloma patients can also present with severe organ failures early in the course of their disease. Intensivists should not be discouraged from admitting these patients to the ICU if the disease is not refractory and the patient is in poor condition, because prognosis in the ICU has improved over the years and can justify their admission.48 Hyperviscosity syndrome is one specific complication that can initially require ICU admission.
Hyperviscosity syndromes may be encountered in multiple myeloma and Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, symptomatic forms being more common in the latter.49,50 Clinical manifestations are mainly neurologic (headaches, alteration or slowdown of cognitive function, stupor, even coma, and rarely seizures), ocular (visual impairment, papillary edema with dilated retinal veins, retinal hemorrhages), and excessive bleeding (mainly mucosal, cutaneous, and retinal). Emergency management is directed at rapidly decreasing blood viscosity through plasmapheresis, which leads to rapid alleviation of the initial symptoms. Long-term management, whether based on high-dose steroids or chemotherapy, is aimed at reducing production of monoclonal immunoglobulin and can be postponed until a hematologist consultant has been reached. Plasmapheresis is the only therapeutic option with immediate efficacy51,52; it consists of the exchange of 1 to 1.5 plasma volumes (5 L maximum), with 100% replacement by 4% human albumin solution. Plasmapheresis should preferably be conducted by a trained hemapheresis team using specifically designed machines. If no such team is available, plasmapheresis can be performed by intensivists on several machines designed for ICU continuous renal replacement (e.g., Spectra-Cobe, Prisma-Hospal), equipped with plasma exchange kits. The rate of plasma exchange is then lower, but these devices allow easy exchange of 1 plasma volume, with standard anticoagulation of the filter (whereas “classic” plasmapheresis is generally performed with citrate anticoagulation). The hemodynamic tolerance is usually correct, even if most patients require volume expansion because of a moderate hypotension after 60% or 70% of the plasma exchange (due to rapid removal of the osmotically active paraprotein).
Key Points
Azoulay E, Fieux F, Moreau D, et al. Acute monocytic leukemia presenting as acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1-5.
Barbui T, Finazzi G, Falanga A. The impact of all-trans-retinoic acid on the coagulopathy of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 1998;91:3093-3102.
Giles FJ, Shen Y, Kantarjian HM, et al. Leukapheresis reduces early mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia with high white blood cell counts but does not improve long-term survival. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001;45:67-73.
Lister A, Abrey LE, Sandlund JT. Central nervous system lymphoma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2002:283-296.
Patte C, Sakiroglu O, Sommelet D. European experience in the treatment of hyperuricemia. Semin Hematol. 2001;38:9-12.
1 Darmon M, Thiery G, Ciroldi M, de Miranda S, Galicier L, Raffoux E, et al. Intensive care in patients with newly diagnosed malignancies and a need for cancer chemotherapy. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(11):2488-2493.
2 Azoulay E, Fieux F, Moreau D, et al. Acute monocytic leukemia presenting as acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1-5.
3 Lister A, Abrey LE, Sandlund JT. Central nervous system lymphoma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2002:283-296.
4 Lechner K, Geisler K, Jäger U, et al. Treatment of acute leukemia. Ann Oncol. 1999;10(Suppl. 6):S45-S51.
5 Fenaux P, Bourhis JH, Ribrag V. Burkitt’s acute lymphocytic leukemia (L3 ALL) in adults. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2001;15:37-50.
6 Hoelzer D, Gökbuget N, Ottmann O, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2002:162-192.
7 Altman A. Acute tumor lysis syndrome. Semin Oncol. 2001;28(Suppl. 5):3-8.
8 Sallan S. Management of acute tumor lysis syndrome. Semin Oncol. 2001;28(Suppl. 5):9-12.
9 Darmon M, Guichard I, Vincent F, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E. Prognostic significance of acute renal injury in acute tumor lysis syndrome. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51(2):221-227.
10 Patte C, Sakiroglu O, Sommelet D. European experience in the treatment of hyperuricemia. Semin Hematol. 2001;38(Suppl. 10):9-12.
11 Ventura GJ, Hester JP, Dixon DO, et al. Analysis of risk factors for fatal hemorrhage during induction therapy of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Hematol Pathol. 1989;3:23-28.
12 Barbui T, Finazzi G, Falanga A. The impact of all-trans retinoic acid on the coagulopathy of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 1998;91:3093-3102.
13 Tallman MS, Nabhan C, Feusner JH, et al. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: Evolving therapeutic strategies. Blood. 2001;99:759-767.
14 Appelbaum FR, Rowe JM, Radich J, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2001:62-86.
15 Porcu P, Farag S, Marcucci G, et al. Leukocytoreduction for acute leukemia. Ther Apher. 2002;6:15-23.
16 Giles FJ, Shen Y, Kantarjian HM, et al. Leukapheresis reduces early mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia with high white blood cell counts but does not improve long-term survival. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001;45:67-73.
17 Thiebaut A, Thomas X, Belhabri A, et al. Impact of pre-induction therapy leukapheresis on treatment outcome in adult acute myelogenous leukemia presenting with hyperleukocytosis. Ann Hematol. 2000;79:501-506.
18 Porcu P, Danielson CF, Orazi A, et al. Therapeutic leukapheresis in hyperleucocytic leukaemias: lack of correlation between degree of cytoreduction and early mortality rate. Br J Haematol. 1997;98:433-436.
19 Avivi I, Robinson S, Goldstone A. Clinical use of rituximab in haematological malignancies. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1389-1394.
20 Vose JM, Chiu BC, Cheson BD, et al. Update on epidemiology and therapeutics for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hematology. 2002:241-262.
21 Evans LS, Hancock BW. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Lancet. 2003;362:139-146.
22 Evens AM, Gordon LI. Burkitt’s and Burkitt-like lymphoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2002;3:291-305.
23 Levine AM. Challenges in the management of Burkitt’s lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma. 2002;3(Suppl. 1):S19-S25.
24 Poortmans PM, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Haaxma-Reiche H, et al. High-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy followed by consolidating radiotherapy in non-AIDS-related primary central nervous system lymphoma: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Group Phase II Trial 20962. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4483-4488.
25 Connors JM, Noordijk EM, Horning SJ. Hodgkin’s disease: Basing the treatment on evidence. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2001:178-193.
26 Yung L, Linch D. Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Lancet. 2003;361:943-951.
27 Diehl V, Stein H, Hummel M, Zollinger R, Connors JM. Hodgkin’s lymphoma: biology and treatment strategies for primary, refractory, and relapsed disease. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2003:225-247.
28 Buyse S, Teixeira L, Galicier L, Mariotte E, Lemiale V, Seguin A, et al. Critical care management of patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Oct;36(10):1695-1702.
29 Créput C, Galicier L, Buyse S, Azoulay E. Understanding organ dysfunction in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jul;34(7):1177-1187.
30 Shimazaki C, Inaba T, Shimura K, et al. B-cell lymphoma associated with haemophagocytic syndrome: A clinical, immunological and cytogenetic study. Br J Haematol. 1999;104:672-679.
31 Gauvin F, Toledano B, Champagne J, et al. Reactive hemophagocytic syndrome presenting as a component of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3341-3345.
32 Janka GE. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Hematology. 2005;10(Suppl. 1):104-107.
33 Imashuku S, Teramura T, Moromoto A, et al. Recent developments in the management of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2001;2:1437-1448.
34 Chen JS, Lin KH, Lin DT, et al. Longitudinal observation and outcome of nonfamilial childhood haemophagocytic syndrome receiving etoposide-containing regimen. Br J Haematol. 1998;103:756-762.
35 Hambleton J, Leung LL, Levi M. Coagulation: Consultative hemostasis. Disseminated intravascular coagulation: New concepts, new controversies. Hematology. 2002:335-352.
36 Rodeghiero F, Avvisati G, Castaman G, et al. Early deaths and anti-hemorrhagic treatments in acute promyelocytic leukemia: A GIMEMA retrospective study in 268 consecutive patients. Blood. 1990;75:2112-2117.
37 Toh CH, Dennis M. Current clinical practice. DIC 2002: A review of disseminated intravascular coagulation. Hematology. 2003;8:65-71.
38 Goldberg MA, Ginsburg D, Mayer RJ, et al. Is heparin administration necessary during induction chemotherapy for patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia? Blood. 1987;69:187-191.
39 Hoyle CF, Swirsky DM, Freddman L, et al. Beneficial effect of heparin in the management of patients with APL. Br J Haematol. 1988;68:283-289.
40 Messori A, Vacca F, Vaiani M, et al. Antithrombin III in patients admitted to intensive care units: A multicenter observational study. Crit Care. 2002;6:447-451.
41 Ostermann H. Antithrombin III in sepsis: New evidences and open questions. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2002;68:445-448.
42 Morris JD, Harris RE, Hashmi R, et al. Antithrombin-III for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced organ dysfunction following bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997;20:871-878.
43 Lynn M, Jeroukhimov I, Klein Y, et al. Updates in the management of severe coagulopathy in trauma patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:S241-S247.
44 Kessler C. Haemorrhagic complications of thrombocytopenia and oral anticoagulation: Is there a role for recombinant activated factor VII? Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:S228-S234.
45 Kristensen J, Killander A, Hippe E, et al. Clinical experience with recombinant factor VIIa in patients with thrombocytopenia. Haemostasis. 1996;26(Suppl. 1):159-164.
46 Vidarsson B, Onundarson PT. Recombinant factor VIIa for bleeding in refractory thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:634-635.
47 Gerotziafas GT, Zervas C, Gavrielidis G, et al. Effective hemostasis with rFVIIa treatment in two patients with severe thrombocytopenia and life-threatening hemorrhage. Am J Hematol. 2002;69:219-222.
48 Azoulay A, Recher C, Alberti C, et al. Changing the use of intensive care for hematological patients: The example of multiple myeloma. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:1395-1401.
49 Siami GA, Siami FS. Plasmapheresis and paraproteinemia: Cryoprotein-induced diseases, monoclonal gammopathy, Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, hyperviscosity syndrome, multiple myeloma, light chain disease, and amyloidosis. Ther Apher. 1999;3:8-19.
50 Mehta J, Singhal S. Hyperviscosity syndrome in plasma cell dyscrasias. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29:467-471.
51 Drew MJ. Plasmapheresis in the dysproteinemias. Ther Apher. 2002;6:45-52.
52 Zarkovic M, Kwaan HC. Correction of hyperviscosity by apheresis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29:535-542.