General approach to poisoning

Published on 23/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1407 times

21.1 General approach to poisoning

Diagnosis

As opposed to overdose in the adult population, exposures in children are nearly always accidental or unintentional. The circumstances around the exposure or ingestion are often unknown or difficult to elucidate. Parents and carers are usually uncertain about time of exposure or dosage of drug ingested. As such, the clear history required to make an accurate risk assessment is difficult or sometimes impossible. Regardless of whether the entire history and circumstances surrounding the exposure are available, it is prudent to plan for a ‘worst-case scenario’, assuming maximal exposure.

Important elements of the focused history include:

Deliberate self-poisoning in adolescents warrants further enquiry into previous ingestions, pre-existing psychiatric illness and management, drug use and social circumstances. In cases of unknown drug exposure, it is important to explore the availability of pharmaceuticals and/or chemicals to which the child may have had access. Plant and mushroom ingestion is common in children and needs to be considered in the acutely unwell child who has been outdoors.

Non-accidental (or deliberate) poisoning of a child requires mandatory reporting to child protection authorities in all jurisdictions within Australia. The index of suspicion is higher in children under the age of 1 year, or where the circumstances of the exposure do not fit the capabilities of the child in question. Rare cases of Munchausen’s syndrome by proxy are also reported in the literature, involving deliberate poisoning of children by their parent/carer.

Physical examination of the potentially poisoned child is usually unremarkable, particularly in asymptomatic children or in the early stage of ED presentation. However, in children presenting with symptoms or patients with altered level of consciousness, a thorough physical examination is vital. Key elements of the toxicological examination include:

Children may also present with a cluster of symptoms and signs suggestive of poisoning, i.e. a toxidrome. Although most cases do not manifest the full spectrum of signs and symptoms, pattern recognition amongst clinicians may provide a clue to diagnosis. Toxidromes and corresponding causative agents commonly seen in children are listed in Table 21.1.2.

Table 21.1.2 Common toxidromes

Toxidrome Agents Clinical features Sympathomimetic Amphetamines
Pseudoephedrine
Caffeine Tachycardia
Hypertension
Mydriasis
Sweating
Agitation
Delirium
Fever Anticholinergic Atropine
Hyoscine
Antihistamines
Plants
Mushrooms Tachycardia
Mydriasis
Loss of visual accommodation
Flushed skin
Dry skin/mouth/eyes
Fever
Delirium Opiate Opiates
Tramadol
Clonidine Sedation
Respiratory depression
Hypotension
Miosis Cholinergic Organophosphates
Carbamates Delirium
Coma
Seizures
Excess secretions (DUMBELS)
Weakness
Fasciculations Serotonergic SSRIs
Cyclic antidepressants
Opiates
Tramadol
Lithium
MDMA (ecstasy) Delirium/agitation
Hyperreflexia
Hypertonia
Tremor
Clonus
Diaphoresis
Fever

SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

Investigations

The vast majority of children exposed to a substance require no investigations at all. There are some instances where a specific agent is ingested and a specific investigation may aid diagnosis and/or management. Screening tests in the poisoned child should be performed based on the risk assessment. Specific investigations, which may be invasive or time-consuming to return a result, should be discussed with an expert toxicologist prior to embarking on these tests. Table 21.1.3 summarises the potential indications for screening and specific investigations in paediatric poisoning. Baseline blood investigations (blood counts, electrolytes, renal function test) should be performed if any of the screening or specific laboratory investigations are ordered.

Table 21.1.3 Investigation of the poisoned child

Investigation Potential toxicological indication(s) Screening tests   Blood glucose level Altered mental status
Deliberate self-poisoning
All exposures to insulin or oral hypoglycaemic agents β-HCG pregnancy test Female patients of childbearing age presenting with overdose Paracetamol level Deliberate self-poisoning (of any substance) Urine drug screen Known or suspected exposure to illicit substances/drugs of abuse
Altered mental status (delirium, psychosis, coma) ECG Heart rate outside normal parameters for age
Haemodynamic instability or shock
Poisoning with specific agents:

Blood gas measurement Known or suspected acid–base abnormality
Poisoning with specific agents:

Specific investigations   Chest/abdominal X-ray Radio-opaque tablet or foreign body ingestion
Known or suspected aspiration pneumonitis
Tube (e.g. endotracheal, gastric) placement Liver function tests Known or suspected paracetamol poisoning
Suspected hepatotoxicity from any systemic poisoning Coagulation panel Snake bite
Suspected coagulopathy from poisoning/envenoming
Poisoning with specific agents:

Paracetamol level In all cases of paracetamol ingestion (incl. deliberate self-poisoning, accidental, supratherapeutic, chronic) Specific drug levels Known or suspected poisoning from:

Notes:

Salicylate levels should not be routinely ordered as their screening value is negligible

Tricyclic antidepressant levels are not useful in the management of poisoning from these agents, nor are they a useful screening test

Rarely performed investigations for specific toxins include cholinesterase levels, carboxyhaemoglobin and methaemoglobin amongst others.

Computerised tomography of brain is not routinely required in the comatose child with a reliable history of poisoning; it may be warranted when the history is unclear, or there is suspicion of trauma or non-accidental injury.

HCG, human chorionic gonadotrophin.

Decontamination

Decontamination involves the removal of a toxic substance to which a child has been exposed in order to minimise its absorption into the systemic circulation. In a child with dermal, eye or mucosal exposure to a substance, decontamination simply involves removal of the toxic substance and irrigation or washing of the contaminated skin, eye or mucosa. Inhalational injury to toxic fumes or gases should include the removal of the patient from the source of exposure and, if necessary, administration of supplemental oxygen. In extreme situations, these patients may need advanced airway and ventilatory support. The use of universal precautions (gown, gloves, goggles) by staff during the process of decontamination is sufficient for the vast majority of poisoning situations, including hydrocarbons and organophosphate insecticides.

Oral exposure to pharmaceuticals, chemicals or plants requires a risk assessment-based approach as to whether decontamination is deemed worthwhile. The need for active oral decontamination in paediatric poisoning is rare. Clinicians are advised to seek expert advice prior to decontamination in children with oral exposures.

Syrup of ipecacuanha (derived from the root of a South American plant) is no longer recommended in the management of poisoning. The induced emesis does little to prevent drug absorption and potentially can cause a myriad of complications including protracted vomiting, aspiration and oesophageal tears and haemorrhage. Gastric lavage (‘stomach pumping’), involving the injection of fluid into the stomach via a tube and aspirating gastric contents, is also a discontinued practice which has little or no role in the management of poisoned children. Whole bowel irrigation involves the administration of a polyethylene glycol solution through the gastrointestinal tract for the purpose of promoting tablet residue in effluent and thus preventing drug absorption. It is reserved for specific ingestions such as sustained-release preparations or metals; expert advice should be sought prior to instituting whole bowel irrigation.

Activated charcoal is a colloidal suspension of charcoal particles able to bind to most pharmaceuticals. Charcoal does not adsorb metals, hydrocarbons, corrosives or alcohols. Although the need for activated charcoal in children is uncommon, it is potentially indicated when a child ingests a highly toxic substance, which is bound by charcoal, and the charcoal can be administered within an hour post-ingestion to an alert child (or in the case of intubated children, via a gastric tube). Clinicians should avoid inserting a gastric tube for the purpose of administering charcoal to a patient with altered level of consciousness. The presence of bowel sounds should always be confirmed prior to the administration of oral charcoal. When indicated, the activated charcoal dose is 1 g kg−1. Expert advice should be sought regarding the use of charcoal in situations beyond an hour post-ingestion or multi-dose activated charcoal (discussed below). Common side effects of charcoal administration include vomiting and the passage of black stools. Aspiration of charcoal can lead to chemical pneumonitis and potentially acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Antidotes

The need for agent-specific antidotes in children is uncommon. Knowledge of antidotes and their potential utility may, in rare cases, be life-saving. Table 21.1.4 lists select antidotes used in paediatric poisoning and their indications. The use of these agents should be discussed with a toxicologist.

Table 21.1.4 Antidotes

Antidote or specific therapy Dose Potential indications Atropine 0.02–0.05 mg kg–1, repeat every 5–10 minutes (use doubling regimen) Known or suspected cholinergic toxidrome from organophosphate or carbamate pesticide poisoning. Titrate to pupil size, heart rate, blood pressure and drying of chest secretions. Calcium Calcium gluconate
10%, 0.6 mL kg–1
Calcium chloride 10%, 0.2 mL kg–1 Calcium-channel blockers:

Desferrioxamine 15 mg kg–1 hr–1 Iron toxicity:

Digoxin Fab antibodies Empiric dose:
Acute poisoning – 5 vials
Chronic poisoning – 1?2 vials Digoxin toxicity:

Ethanol PO/NG route preferred
Loading dose: 750 mg kg–1
Infusion: 80–150 mg kg–1 hr–1 Known or suspected poisoning from toxic alcohols (ethylene glycol, methanol):

Maintain blood ethanol at 100 mg dL–1 Flumazenil 0.005–0.01 mg kg–1
(max 2 mg) Benzodiazepine poisoning:

N.B. Titrate to respiratory rate Glucagon 0.05–0.1 mg kg–1 β-Blockers
Bradycardia
Hypotension Insulin (high dose + dextrose) Initial dose 1 unit kg–1
Infusion: 1–2 units kg–1 hr–1 β-Blockers
Calcium channel blockers
Bradycardia or heart block
Hypotension N-Acetylcysteine 1st: 150 mg kg–1 over 15–30 min,
2nd: 50 mg kg–1 over 4 hours,
3rd: 100 mg kg–1 over 16 hours Paracetamol poisoning:
Patients at risk of, or with established, hepatotoxicity Naloxone Bolus: 0.005-0.01 mg kg–1 (max 2 mg);
Infusion: 0.01 mg kg–1 hr–1 Known or suspected opiate toxidrome. Titrate to respiratory rate Octreotide Bolus: 1 mcg kg–1 IV or SC
Infusion: 0.5 mcg kg–1 hr–1 IV Sulfonylurea poisoning with recurrent hypoglycaemia Physostigmine 0.02 mg kg–1 (max 0.5 mg) Anticholinergic poisoning with delirium Sodium bicarbonate 1–2 mmol kg–1 IV bolus (serum alkalinisation) Cyclic antidepressants (and other cardiac sodium channel blocking agents):

Vitamin K 5–10 mg, PO
1–2 mg, IV or IM Poisoning from warfarin (or other coumadin anticoagulants) with established, or risk of, coagulopathy

IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous; PO, per oram; SC, subcutaneous.

Supportive care

Active resuscitation of the severely poisoned child is paramount and should be followed by meticulous attention to supportive care in a high dependency or intensive care environment. Although specific poisoning scenarios are dealt with in the next chapter, the guiding principles of excellent supportive management of the poisoned child are likely to be more crucial.

All children with altered level of consciousness should have close glucose monitoring. Coma from drug overdose should be managed with advanced airway and ventilatory manoeuvres. In general, non-invasive ventilation does not have a role in the poisoned child. Drug-induced seizures from all causes should be treated with parenteral benzodiazepines as the first-line agents of choice. Phenytoin should be avoided as its sodium channel blocking properties may exacerbate the problem.

Cardiovascular collapse and asystole in the poisoned child should be managed as per standard advanced paediatric life support guidelines. Drug-induced arrhythmias may warrant agent-specific strategies, such as antidotes. Wide QRS complex tachyarrhythmias, usually due to sodium channel blocking agent poisoning, should in the first instance be treated with boluses of sodium bicarbonate (1–2 mmol kg–1).

Close monitoring and maintenance of normothermia, euglycaemia, acid–base balance and electrolyte levels are vital in the severely poisoned child. Other potential complications in this group of patients include rhabdomyolysis (seen in snake bite, prolonged coma), aspiration pneumonitis, and persistent delirium (commonly due to anti-cholinergic drugs or plants).