Forehead Rejuvenation

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 6317 times

Chapter 7 Forehead Rejuvenation

The plastic surgery armamentarium for forehead rejuvenation has expanded considerably during the past 15 years.1–12 Whereas the focus of rejuvenation in the past was focused mainly on the face and neck, it has now become widely recognized that rejuvenation of the forehead is essential to produce a natural, well-balanced result. There is now greater emphasis on minimizing incisions and long-term side effects, such as numbness, while achieving a superior aesthetic outcome with improved patient satisfaction. Less invasive techniques have also emerged.

Indications

Preoperative History and Considerations

Patient assessment

A proper forehead length and eyebrow position with a smooth and properly contoured forehead is an integral part of facial beauty (see Chapter 1). Any disturbance of this balance undoubtedly detracts from the pulchritude of the face.

Slight elongation of the forehead is a fairly constant component of the aging process for both men and women. Male pattern baldness resulting in receding frontal hair not only affects men, but may also alter the forehead length in women. The elongated forehead by itself denotes aging, and correcting it will yield a more rejuvenated appearance.

The main complaint of a patient with forehead aging is the frown lines. These wrinkles bestow a tired and perturbed appearance. Although these patients may not be truly angry or unhappy, they are commonly asked why they seem vexed.

Patients often incorrectly attribute the periorbital aging condition to excess eyelid skin rather than ptosis of the eyebrows, and demonstrate what they wish to achieve through surgery by manually raising their eyebrows. The surgeon should use this occasion to point out that it is the elevation of the eyebrows rather than the stretching out of redundant eyelid skin directly that is improving the eyelid appearance.

Patients with eyebrow and eyelid ptosis either consciously or subconsciously may recruit the frontalis muscle to aid in opening their eyelids.14 These two conditions should be differentiated in one of the following two ways:

For a complete evaluation the eyebrow and eyelid imperfections are reviewed as a unit and the abnormal findings should be categorized and clearly explained to the patient. Flaws related to the forehead include:

It is important to inquire about and record the frequency, severity and duration of frontal and temporal migraine headaches in patients who are undergoing forehead rejuvenation. Many of these patients will enjoy the potential elimination or reduction of migraine headaches resultant from forehead injection of botulinum toxin A.

Fat Injection

Loss of subcutaneous volume is a significant factor in the process of aging, and results in ptosis of the skin and the development of lines and folds. Any modality that restores the thickness of the skin and subcutaneous tissue invariably reduces the visibility of these lines.

Since the introduction of fat injection as the means to eliminate facial lines, there has been a longstanding debate about its efficacy and reliability. In 1911 Brunings3 injected small cubes of autologous adipose tissue under the skin during rhinoplasty, but there was significant absorption of the injected fat.2 Interest in fat injection for facial rejuvenation has recently re-emerged as a result of the refinement of techniques and more reliable outcomes.15

Operative Technique

Complications

A distinct disadvantage of fat injection is its unpredictability, but multiple passes and injections in different planes may improve the predictability and reliability. Another disadvantage is its failure to eliminate the muscle function, thus its inability to avoid recurrence of lines.

Fat injection is generally an uncomplicated procedure, but over- or under-injection may occur.

One serious complication of fat injection, which is extremely rare, is blindness.11,12 The loss of eyesight is probably related to embolization of the injected fat into the retinal artery. If this complication develops, immediate consultation with an ophthalmologist is necessary. Intentional overcorrection may result in longlasting glabellar fullness, which may ultimately resolve. This site is more privileged as a fat recipient site than most sites in terms of retention of the injected volume, and complete fat absorption is unlikely, which reduces the need for an overcorrection.

Fat Graft

Operative Approach

Since its introduction by Neubeur in 1893, the use of an autologous fat graft has been consistently popular.18 The degree of fat graft take is:

After a large volume of fat is grafted, it undergoes distinct cytologic changes resulting in a peripheral zone of viable adipocytes, an intermediate zone of inflammation, and a central zone of necrosis. Therefore, the larger the volume of grafted tissue, the higher the percentage of the graft absorbed. In fact, if a large graft is used, one should expect a volume loss of 50% or more.

When a fat graft is thinner than 1 cm, a larger percentage of tissue will be revascularized and retained.

The amount of fat necessary to fill the glabellar frown lines is minimal, and this results in a high success rate.

Using fat grafts becomes a particularly useful adjunct to forehead rejuvenation when a concomitant procedure provides suitable donor tissue. A combination of facial rhytidectomy and fat graft to the frown lines is a notable example. The surgeon may use fat alone or dermis and fat in combination; however, when addition of a dermal component may increase the risk of cyst formation.

Transpalpebral Corrugator Resection

Operative Approach

A transpalpebral incision may be used to resect the corrugator which usually results in disappearance of the frown lines (Fig. 7.4A-D).19,20 Transpalpebral corrugator resection may be performed concurrently with an endoscopic procedure to facilitate removal of the corrugator muscle. The advantages of this operation are its simplicity with direct and full exposure of nerves and muscles. The results are highly predictable and reproducible. When combined with a blepharoplasty, fat is readily available for replacement of the corrugator muscle.

Relevant surgical anatomy

Operative technique

While the orbicularis muscle is being retracted anteriorly, the depressor and corrugator supercilii muscles are exposed immediately cephalad to the orbital rim (Fig. 7.6). A few branches of the supratrochlear nerve may become visible at this point; if so, they should be retracted and protected.
image

Fig. 7.6 Transpalpebral corrugator resection 2. The corrugator muscle is exposed as widely as possible while orbicularis muscle is retracted anteriorly.

(From Michelow B, Guyuron B. Rejuvenation of the upper face. A logical gamut of surgical options. Clin Plast Surg 1997; 24(2):199-212).

At this point pieces of fat that have been harvested from the medial portion of the upper eyelids are placed into the space created by the resection of the corrugator muscles (Fig. 7.8). Use of this fat offers several distinct advantages: it fills in the depression that may result from a thorough resection of the corrugator muscle; it shields residual corrugator fibers so even if the corrugator resection is not complete or if muscle fibers regenerate, they will be deprived of bony insertion and muscle that does not have bony fixation is not as potent; as part of the senescence, the glabellar area becomes flatter, so rejuvenation of the forehead should include replacement of the lost volume in this region. The fat graft is fixed to the underlying periosteum using 6-0 Vicryl or Monocryl to prevent postoperative dislodgement.
image

Fig. 7.8 Transpalpebral corrugator resection 4. A matching size fat graft is used to replace the resected corrugator muscle and, if necessary, to contour the glabellar area.

(From Michelow B, Guyuron B. Rejuvenation of the upper face. A logical gamut of surgical options. Clin Plast Surg 1997; 24(2):199-212).

Endoscopic Rejuvenation

Operative Approach

The endoscopic procedure has revolutionized forehead rejuvenation for many surgeons. It is performed almost exclusively on an outpatient basis.

The most significant advantage of endoscopic forehead rejuvenation is the avoidance of the large incisional scars that are inherent to the open techniques. Many patients who decline forehead rejuvenation because of concerns about the incisional scars are willing to proceed with an endoscopic procedure when they learn about the alternatives. Other advantages are the reduced chance of forehead elongation (which is commonly observed after a coronal incision) and a diminished chance of surgery-related alopecia, primarily because the incisions have been minimized. Even if some hair is lost around the incision, this is temporary and the hair follicles usually recover. The magnification is another positive aspect of endoscopic surgery.

Operative technique

Using the Obwegeser periosteal elevator, enough space is created above the deep and superficial temporal fascia to allow insertion of the Endoscopic Access Device (Fig. 7.10). To insert the EAD the inner shield is folded using a pair of large multi-tooth Adson forceps and while the skin hooks are separating the wound margins, the surgeon introduces the inner shield into the wound step-by-step (Fig. 7.11). Any resultant folds inside the lumen are easily eliminated by inserting the forceps into the central cannula and running them around the lumen.
The dissection is continued toward the supraorbital rim using the endoscope (Fig. 7.12). The arcus marginalis and the periorbita are released along the entire supraorbital rim using a longer periosteal elevator (Fig. 7.13).
The corrugator muscle lies superficial to a communicating vein between the supratrochlear and supraorbital veins. This vein is cauterized and the corrugator muscle is removed as radically as possible using the Daniel grasper or punch biopsy (Fig. 7.14). If necessary, the nerves are retracted with a nerve hook. The periosteum over the glabellar area is elevated but not transected in most patients, unless there is a significant medial eyebrow ptosis with skin folding over the radix.
In most patients, one fascia suspension suture on each side achieves the aesthetic goal.26 At no point is a medial suspension performed. To achieve proper fixation, two single skin hooks are placed at the junction of the anterio-caudal one-third and the posteriocephalad two-thirds of the incision, and the wound edges are retracted. With the surgeon’s index finger of the nondominant hand everting the caudal portion of the incision, a 3-0 polydioxanone (PDS) suture is passed in and out, taking a substantial bite of the superficial temporal fascia, which is then passed out-in through the opposite side of the same incision (Fig. 7.16).
The free end of the previously placed PDS suture is bent using a pair of fine hemostats, passed through the tunnel (Fig. 7.19) and tied incrementally, while closely watching the eyebrow. A similar suture is placed on the opposite side if necessary. The distance from the cranial border of the eyebrow to the eyelash is measured bilaterally while the eyes are closed. Generally, this distance should be about 25 mm.

Complications

Although the corrugator muscle can be resected more thoroughly, the deep horizontal lines on the forehead are not as effectively addressed with endoscopic forehead rejuvenation as they are with the open technique, particularly with the subcutaneous forehead lift. This deficiency can be overcome to some degree, however, by combining endoscopic forehead rejuvenation and laser resurfacing. The endoscope approach is not an optimal choice for those who have an elongated forehead.

An endoscopic forehead rejuvenation may result in inadequate or excessive elevation of the eyebrows, asymmetry, dimpling upon animation, undercorrection, overcorrection, or persistent paresthesia.27 A suboptimal endoscopic forehead rejuvenation result is often the consequence of under, or uneven, resection of the muscle. Uneven resection of the muscle may also cause dimpling of the forehead skin. Over-elevation of the eyebrows, most often medially due to aggressive medial soft tissue release, is the consequence of zealous dissection and aggressive repositioning of the eyebrows.27

Alopecia around the incision is unlikely and, if it occurs, is often transient. However, using screws for fixation, compared to bone tunneling, may result in a higher incidence of localized alopecia as a result of undue tension on the skin level.

Damage to the temporal branch of the facial nerve may result in paralysis of the frontalis muscle. If this occurs, it is often ephemeral; however, permanent injury to this nerve is also possible.

Persistent and intense itching of the forehead may be experienced after an endoscopic or coronal forehead lift. There is no universally accepted treatment for this complication, but use of antiserotonin-type compounds, such as cyproheptadine, may result in some relief. Use of antihistamines may have a beneficial effect.

Infection and hematoma are also complications of this surgery.

The disadvantages of endoscopic rejuvenation include the need for specialized instruments and a training process, which is absolutely vital. Performing an operation using an endoscope while watching a monitor, rather than directly inspecting the surgical site, is a different experience for many surgeons, and proper training and education are essential. The chance of sensory nerve damage is initially slightly higher because this dissection is conducted through a two-dimensional view, whereas a safe nerve dissection mandates three-dimensional observation.

Coronal Forehead Lift

Operative Approach

Because of the increasing popularity of endoscopic forehead rejuvenation, the coronal forehead lift has lost some of its popularity. Its advantages include speed of surgery and a bloodless plane of dissection.

Every student of aesthetic plastic surgery should be familiar with this technique and perhaps begin learning the forehead rejuvenation with an open technique provided the patient is willing to accept the incisional scar. This offers an opportunity for the novice surgeon to become more knowledgeable about the forehead anatomy and pathology.

Operative technique

The corrugator and the depressor supercilii muscles are removed as radically as possible (Fig. 7.22). If necessary, the procerus muscle is also released, but no attempt is made to remove the procerus muscle completely.

Complications

The most serious complication of coronal forehead rejuvenation is hair loss. This type of alopecia is unlikely unless undue tension has been exerted on the scalp flap or the patient smokes cigarettes.

A coronal forehead lift may also produce suboptimal results such as undercorrection, or more commonly, overcorrection.

Patients may experience some paresthesia or permanent anesthesia in the forehead area after this operation. Infection and hematoma are also very rare.

Because of the need for further lateral dissection, the frontal branch of the facial nerves can be injured.24 Other possible complications include wide or depressed scars, recurrent brow ptosis, poor brow elevation, and intense itching of the scalp.29 The ear-to-ear coronal incision, which may result in alopecia, is the major drawback of this technique.30 Connell et al.10 warn their patients that unusual scalp sensations and intense itching may occur 3-6 months after surgery. The symptoms usually disappear after 6-9 months. Occasionally the patient may feel forehead tightness persisting for 12-18 months; regenerating sensory nerves are probably the cause of this sensation.

Adamson et al.1 noted that of the 40 patients who underwent coronal forehead lifts in his study, transient paresthesia (resolving within 6 months) occurred in 17%, a widened scar in 12%, transient frontal nerve paresis (lasting 3 weeks to 3 months) in 12%, and dysesthesia in 10%. Two patients experienced localized alopecia, and two sustained transient episodes of depression.

Forehead Rhytidectomy with Pretrichial Incision

Forehead rhytidectomy with pretrichial incision has many advantages:

Operative Approach

Operative technique

The incision design is critical and will determine the visibility of the scars in most patients. If the patient is endowed with an exaggerated widow’s peak, the incision will be started approximately 1 cm behind this anatomic landmark, continued along the hairline to the temple area, and taken behind the hairline toward the side-burns. The incision should be designed in a curvilinear fashion to further minimize its visibility (Fig. 7.25). Centrally, because the amount of skin removed is somewhat minimal, a portion of the widow’s peak could be preserved. The amount of skin to be removed laterally is significant; however, the hair in this area is sparse and fine, so what is removed is not often consequential. This type of incision often allows a portion of the incision to fall behind the hairline.
As the skin is then re-draped, a great deal of excessive skin overlaps the incision (Fig. 7.29). The redundant skin is excised and repaired tension-free using 6-0 Monocryl and 6-0 fast absorbable catgut.

The aesthetic goals are achieved predictably (Fig. 7.30).

For patients who do not demonstrate deep horizontal lines or for those who smoke, dissection may be subperiosteal or submuscular without any subcutaneous component.

Dissection in the submuscular plane

Complications

If a subcutaneous dissection is used on a patient who currently smokes or smoked heavily in the past or if the skin is pulled too vigorously, skin necrosis may result. For this reason, the submuscular dissection is a safer choice for the patient who is a current or past smoker. Although permanent paresthesia of the scalp is an unlikely result of a subcutaneous forehead lift, it becomes more likely when the dissection has been submuscular. Asymmetry and damage to the facial nerve are specific complications of submuscular dissection.

In a study of 30 patients with anterior incision forehead rejuvenation13 only two patients (who were smokers) experienced small areas of necrosis requiring revisions.

In another study by Vogel and Hoopes31, complications of subcutaneous forehead rhytidectomy included one small hematoma, temporary or clinically unnoticeable hypesthesia (66%), altered scalp sensibility (33%), persistent forehead hypesthesia or paresthesia (33%), and temporary (12%) or permanent (12%) alopecia.

To determine whether beveled or perpendicular incisions should be used when areas containing hair follicles are incised during brow elevation or facial rejuvenation, Camirand and Doucet4 studied 30 patients. For each patient, one half of the incision was beveled and the opposite half was perpendicular. Neither the patients nor the examiners were aware of the type of incision used for each side. The resulting scars were examined for visibility, nonlinearity, absence of hypopigmentation, and presence of hair in and in front of the scar. In 95% of the patients the scar on the side that was incised in a beveled fashion was judged to be more desirable.

The disadvantages of forehead rhytidectomy with pretrichial incision are the additional time required for dissection and detailed repair, and the potential for a visible scar at the hair junction on the frontal area.13

Operative Approach

The forehead may become elongated as a consequence of senescence or genetic predisposition. It can also be the consequence of hair loss or may result from a coronal forehead lift. Slight or moderate elongation of the forehead can be corrected by the pretrichial incision described above. For a patient who exhibits significant forehead elongation, exceeding 1.5-2 cm beyond what is considered aesthetically pleasing, a scalp advancement is performed.32 This procedure can be combined with a forehead lift or can be utilized merely to shorten the forehead on a patient who has previously undergone an open forehead rejuvenation that has elongated the forehead.

Operative technique

The galeal fascia is advanced and fixed to the bone in three sites on each row (Fig. 7.33). As indicated earlier, the number of rows is dictated by the suppleness of the skin and the amount of advancement necessary. Each relaxation incision will yield 1.0-1.5 cm of advancement depending on the elasticity of the scalp. For a patient who needs a full 2-4 cm of advancement, three rows of relaxation incisions and bone tunnels may be necessary. A final row of sutures is placed to fix the posterior flap margin to the underlying bone at the hairline level, using the markings described earlier, to avoid unplanned elevation of the eyebrows.

References

1. Adamson P.A., Cormier R., McGraw B.L. The coronal forehead lift – modifications and results. J Otolaryngol. 1992;21:25-29.

2. Billings E.Jr, May J.W.Jr. Historical review and present status of free fat graft autotransplantation in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:368-381.

3. Bruning P. Contribution a l’etude des greffes adipeuses. Bull Acad Roy Med Belgique. 1914;28:440.

4. Camirand A., Doucet J. A comparison between parallel hairline incisions and perpendicular incisions when performing a face-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:10-15.

5. Carruthers A., Kiene K., Carruthers J. Botulinum A exotoxin use in clinical dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34:788-797.

6. Carruthers J.D., Carruthers J.A. Treatment of glabellar frown lines with C. botulinum-A exotoxin. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;18:17-21.

7. Chajchir A., Benzaquen I. Fat-grafting injection for soft tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;85:921-934.

8. Chajchir A., Benzaquen I., Moretti I. Comparative experimental study of autologous adipose tissue processed by different techniques. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1993;17:113-115.

9. Coleman S.R. Long-term survival of fat transplants: controlled demonstrations. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995;19:421-425.

10. Connell B.F., Lambros V.S., Neurohr G.H. The forehead lift: techniques to avoid complications and produce optimal results. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1989;13:217-237.

11. Dreizen N.G., Framm L. Sudden unilateral visual loss after autologous fat injection into the glabellar area. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:85-87.

12. Egido J.A., Arroyo R., Marcos A., et al. Middle cerebral artery embolism and unilateral visual loss after autologous fat injection into the glabellar area. Stroke. 1993;24:615-616.

13. Guyuron B., Davies B. Subcutaneous anterior hairline forehead rhytidectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1988;12:77-83.

14. Hinderer U.T., Urriolagoitia F., Vildosola R. The blepharoperiorbitoplasty: anatomical basis. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;18:437-453.

15. Coleman S.R. Facial recontouring with lipostructure. Clin Plast Surg. 1997;24:347-367.

16. Michelow B., Guyuron B. Rejuvenation of the upper face: a logical gamut of surgical options. Clin Plast Surg. 1997;24:199-212.

17. Guyuron B., Majzoub M.D. Facial augmentation with core fat graft: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(1):295-302.

18. Neuber G. Fat transplantation. Verl Dtsh Ges Chir. 1893;22:66.

19. Guyron B., Michelow B., Thomas T. Corrugator supercilii muscle resection through blepharoplasty incision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:691-696.

20. Knize D.M. Transpalpebral approach to the corrugator supercilii and procerus muscles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:52-62.

21. McGregor L. A synopsis of surgical anatomy, 4th edn, Bristol: John Wright & Sons; 1942:1-4.

.

22. Isse N., Fodor P.B. Forehead rejuvenation. In: Isse N., Fodor P.B., editors. Endoscopically assisted plastic surgery. St Louis: Mosby, 1996.

23. Gross C.M., editor. Gray’s anatomy of the human body, 28th edn. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger. 1968:382-385.

24. Lorenc Z.P., Ivy E., Aston S.J. Neurosensory preservation in endoscopic forehead plasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995;19:411-413.

25. Guyuron B., Rose K. Harvesting fat from the infra temporal fossa. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:245-247.

26. Guyuron B., Kopal C., Michelow P.J. Stability after endoscopic forehead surgery using single-point fascia fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;116:1988-1994.

27. Guyuron B. Endoscopic forehead rejuvenation. I. Limitations, flaws, and rewards [reply]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1116-1119.

28. Camirand A. Hairline incisions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:736-737.

29. Ramirez O.M. The anchor subperiosteal forehead lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:993-1003.

30. Vasconez L.O., Core G.B., Gamoa-Bobadilla M., et al. Endoscopic techniques in coronal brow lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94:788-793.

31. Vogel J.E., Hoopes J.E. The subcutaneous forehead lift with an anterior hairline incision. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;28:257-265.

32. Guyuron B., Behmand R.A., Green R. Shortening of the forehead. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:218-223.