Fever of Unknown Origin

Published on 06/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1986 times

86 Fever of Unknown Origin

Fever is one of the most common signs that prompt parents to seek medical attention for their children, accounting for up to 15% of office visits to pediatricians. Although most pediatric febrile illnesses have an easily identifiable source, a small percentage of children have prolonged fevers with no clear etiology. In children, fever of unknown origin (FUO) has classically been defined as a 2-week history of daily fevers >38.3°C with no identifiable etiology after a thorough physical examination and an initial screening diagnostic evaluation have been performed.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis for FUO can be broadly divided into the following categories: infection, collagen vascular or autoimmune, and malignancy. A number of case series have followed children who were evaluated for FUO to determine the underlying etiology of fever in these patients (Table 86-1). Many of these reports are decades old and may not comprise the underlying infectious etiologies of FUO because of the advancement of clinical microbiologic laboratory and diagnostic imaging modalities, as well as the emergence of novel pathogens. Nonetheless, these studies are informative in that the most commonly identified etiologies for FUO have remained stable through time.

Table 86-1 Underlying Diagnosis in Fever of Unknown Origin in 545 Patients from Compiled Case Reports

Diagnosis Total (n) Established Diagnoses (%)
Infectious 262 62
Epstein-Barr virus 26 6
Viral syndrome 22 5
Urinary tract infection 22 5
Pneumonia 19 4
Osteomyelitis 18 4
Viral meningitis or encephalitis 17 4
Bacterial meningitis 14 3
Pharyngitis or tonsillitis 14 3
Viral upper respiratory infection 12 3
Streptococcosis 9 2
Otitis media 8 2
Bartonellosis 8 2
Bacterial enteritis 7 2
Viral gastroenteritis 7 2
Sinusitis 6 1
Subacute bacterial endocarditis 5 1
Tuberculosis 5 1
Rickettsial infection 5 1
Cytomegalovirus 5 1
Tularemia 4 1
Other Infections 29 7
Collagen Vascular or Autoimmune 65 15
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis 28 7
Inflammatory bowel disease 11 3
Rheumatic fever 7 2
Other collagen vascular 19 4
Malignancy 27 6
Leukemia 14 3
Lymphoma 4 1
Other malignancy 9 2
Other 65 17
Drug reaction 8 2
Factitious fever 6 1
Miscellaneous 51 14
Total established diagnoses 426 78
Diagnosis unknown 119 22

Infection

Infections comprise the majority of identifiable causes of FUO in children, accounting for up to 50% of all final diagnoses. In most cases, the underlying diagnosis reflects an unusual presentation of a common illness rather than a typical presentation of an uncommon entity.

Bacterial Infections

Identification of bacterial sources of FUO is important because early diagnosis can lead to prompt initiation of antimicrobial therapy and fewer long-term consequences. The most common bacterial infections causing FUO in children are upper and lower respiratory tract infections (including otitis media, sinusitis, and pneumonia), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and osteomyelitis. Although the history and physical examination often point to these diagnoses, many of these infections may present with isolated fever. In particular, UTI should be considered in all patients with FUO because physical examination findings are not reliable in patients with UTIs, and in younger, nonverbal children, the history may not suggest UTI.

Soft tissue infections of the head and neck (including tonsillopharyngitis, peritonsillar abscess, and cervical adenitis) can also lead to prolonged fevers, although localizing symptoms usually prompt earlier diagnosis of these entities. Endocarditis is an important cause of FUO in patients with congenital or acquired heart disease; this entity can also occur in patients without an underlying structural heart anomaly, particularly in the case of infections with Staphylococcus aureus. Although isolated prolonged fever rarely occurs in bacterial meningitis, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all febrile patients. The incidence of occult bacteremia has decreased in recent years after the introduction of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenza type B vaccines. Still, it should be considered in the case of isolated fevers, particularly in young children who are not fully immunized or who have not received vaccinations.

Bartonellosis, or cat scratch disease, is an increasingly identified etiology of FUO in children and should especially be considered in patients with marked regional adenopathy or a history of exposure to cats or kittens. Enteric infections, such as salmonellosis and yersiniosis, have also been identified as sources of FUO; a history of gastrointestinal (GI) complaints is suggestive in these cases. Returned travelers or recent immigrants may present with typhoid (Salmonella typhi or Salmonella paratyphi) or typhoidal rickettsial infections. Both pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) must be included in the differential diagnosis in every patient with FUO because isolated prolonged fever is often the only presenting sign. Zoonotic infections are less common, but still identifiable, causes of FUO. Among these are tularemia, brucellosis, and Q fever, and they should be considered with the appropriate exposures. Ehrlichiosis, anaplasmosis, and Rocky Mountain spotted fever are tickborne infections and may present with prolonged fever; the incidence of these infections varies greatly with geography and season.

Collagen Vascular and Autoimmune Disorders

Fever may be a major presenting symptom in many noninfectious inflammatory conditions. Among these, the acute onset of fever occurs most commonly in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Kawasaki’s disease (KD) (see Chapters 26 and 28). The incidence of KD varies greatly with geography. In the United States, the average incidence ranges between 3.1 and 8.9 cases per 100,000 children per year. Apart from being the more common noninfectious inflammatory causes of fever among children, these disorders are important because they require early recognition and treatment to prevent long-term complications.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) accounts for a subset of patients with FUO, although this entity does not usually present with isolated fever but rather with multiorgan involvement. Apart from KD, other vasculitides may present with fever in addition to other organ involvement. Juvenile Behçet’s disease in children older than age 1 year may include fever as a symptom, and polyarteritis nodosa should be considered in older children with fever and muscle and skin involvement. Remaining identified vasculitides are either very rare in children or are unlikely to present with isolated fever, such as Henoch-Schönlein purpura (see Chapter 28).

Recurrent intermittent fevers may occur as part of a periodic fever syndrome. The most commonly encountered of these is periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis disease (PFAPA). The syndrome is rarely associated with fevers that last longer than 1 week. The hereditary fever disorders are far less common but are potential etiologies of recurrent fevers in children. One hereditary fever syndrome that may present with prolonged fever is tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS). In young children and especially infants with persistent or recurrent fevers, an underlying immunodeficiency should be considered (see Chapter 21).

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly Crohn’s disease, has become an important diagnostic consideration in children with FUO. Because this entity may be difficult to diagnose at an early age, patients may present with a history of prolonged isolated fever and growth failure with or without intestinal manifestations (see Chapter 110).

Approach to the Patient

In a well-appearing child who continues to thrive, the evaluation for FUO may be performed in the outpatient setting. A thorough history will offer many clues to the potential etiology of FUO and will help guide the appropriate diagnostic workup. The major exception to this is a an infant younger than 90 days old with fever. Because fever is a less common but more concerning presenting sign in this population, these patients warrant an immediate laboratory evaluation to assess for serious bacterial infections (see Chapter 105).

History

A careful fever history is of extreme importance. Although many parents initially report a history of daily fever for 2 weeks or more, it is important to distinguish one prolonged febrile episode from many serial illnesses. The height and pattern of fever should also be recorded.

The child’s overall state of health should be described, including activity level and appetite. A history of any localizing or coexisting symptoms should be elicited because they may help target the investigation (Table 86-2). The patient’s age and any underlying conditions may offer clues to the diagnosis and help to organize the differential diagnosis. A thorough medication history should be recorded, particularly when considering drug fever. A detailed family history should explore for family members with a history of rheumatologic conditions, malignancy, or IBD.

Table 86-2 Localizing Symptoms in Patients with Fever of Unknown Origin

Organ System Symptoms
Central nervous system Headache
Neck stiffness
Lethargy or irritability
Personality or cognitive changes
Respiratory Nasal congestion or rhinorrhea
Sinus pain
Otalgia
Cough
Dyspnea
Chest pain
Hemoptysis
Ocular Painful or dry eyes
Ocular discharge
Oral Oral ulcers
Gastrointestinal Abdominal pain
Abdominal distension
Changes in appetite
Vomiting
Diarrhea
Hematochezia
Genitourinary Dysuria, frequency, urgency
Back pain
Urethral ulcers or discharge
Musculoskeletal Extremity or joint swelling or pain
Limp or limited extremity use

The social history should include any exposure to ill contacts. Risk factors for TB exposure should be determined. A detailed travel history is important because tropical or exotic infections should be considered. Zoonotic exposures, including contact with livestock, cats, rodents, and reptiles, should be investigated. A dietary history should include consumption of unpasteurized dairy products.

Physical Examination

The physical examination has the highest yield when the child is comfortable in the presence of his or her parents. The child’s overall state of health should be noted, including a lethargic or wasted appearance, level of activity, hydration status, and the presence of irritability or inconsolability. Growth percentiles should be charted; stunted growth may point to a more chronic underlying disease process. If a rash is present, it is important to understand the history and evolution of the lesions. Oral lesions may coexist with a rash or occur independently.

The respiratory tract is a common source of infection in children. Vital signs will indicate tachypnea or hypoxia. The overall work of breathing should be noted. An examination of the upper respiratory tract may reveal cough, middle ear effusions, sinus tenderness, rhinorrhea, or stridor. Likewise, auscultation of the lower respiratory tract is important for identification of rales, rhonchi, wheezing, or decreased aeration.

The cardiovascular examination should include auscultation for murmurs and examination of the skin and extremities for signs of endocarditis, such as petechiae, Janeway’s lesions, Osler’s nodes, and splinter hemorrhages. These stigmata are often absent in younger children. The abdominal examination may reveal hepatosplenomegaly, localizing tenderness, or palpable masses. Suprapubic tenderness and costovertebral tenderness should be elicited. A rectal examination with guaiac smear for occult blood should be performed, particularly if a concern exists for IBD. Potential findings on the genitourinary examination include ulcerations or discharge.

An ophthalmologic examination should be performed; this may reveal uveitis, Roth spots, or signs of infection. The presence of adenopathy should be noted, as well as any tenderness or signs of adenitis. The musculoskeletal examination may help localize the source of fever. Any point tenderness, refusal to bear weight, or limited use of an extremity may suggest an underlying osteomyelitis or malignancy. The patient should be witnessed walking or bearing weight, if developmentally appropriate. All joints should be examined for effusions or arthritis. Muscle tenderness or weakness may suggest myositis. Any positive findings from the physical examination should be used to focus the diagnostic evaluation.

Diagnostic Testing

As the sensitivity and availability of laboratory tests and imaging modalities advance, the identifiable underlying causes of FUO in children continue to evolve (Fig. 86-1). Specifically, viral pathogens and fastidious bacteria that were formally difficult to isolate in culture are more easily detected with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Additionally, improvements in computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography for imaging the abdominal cavity have virtually eliminated the need for exploratory laparotomy as a final resort in diagnosis in FUO. Finally, newer techniques in positron emission tomography (PET) scanning allow for identification of regions with increased metabolic activity, making it possible to find potential sources of FUO even in the absence of localizing clinical signs. Still, the diagnostic workup should proceed in a stepwise fashion, using the history and physical examination to guide the testing modalities selected for each patient.

Screening Evaluation

An initial screening laboratory evaluation is appropriate and may be performed in the outpatient setting (Box 86-1). A complete blood count with differential may be very revealing. An elevated white blood cell count is a nonspecific sign of inflammation, but the degree of elevation is informative. The types of cells that are prominent in the differential count may point toward the source of inflammation. In addition, some infections are associated with leucopenia as well. Microcytic anemia can occur in the setting of chronic disease. Thrombocytosis is a nonspecific marker of inflammation because platelets are acute phase reactants. The suppression of cell lines may point to a rheumatologic or hematologic or neoplastic process. Inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate are not specific if elevated, but they give an overall impression of level of inflammation. Baseline inflammatory markers are useful in tracking the course of illness. Urinalysis, urine culture, and blood culture should be obtained in all patients. A complete metabolic profile may demonstrate transaminitis or indicate impaired kidney function. Chest radiography is part of the initial evaluation of all patients and may identify parenchymal disease, pulmonary nodules, hilar adenopathy, or cardiomegaly. A purified protein derivative tuberculin skin test should be done on all patients, regardless of known risk factors for infection with TB.

Laboratory Testing

Further laboratory testing should be directed by the history and physical and screening evaluation using less invasive testing preferentially. This workup may continue in the outpatient setting initially. Hospitalization is indicated in ill-appearing children and in patients who have had weeks of prolonged fever with no identifiable source after an extensive outpatient investigation.

Common infections should be considered first given the relatively high likelihood of these processes causing FUO; testing for these infections should be performed early in the diagnostic evaluation. Serologic testing for EBV and Bartonella henselae (if there is a kitten exposure) should be performed. Common systemic viral infections should also be considered early. PCR testing is available for many viral pathogens and can be performed from many sources, including blood, urine, stool, respiratory secretions, and cerebrospinal fluid. Increasing the number of sources of body fluids or tissue samples that are sent for PCR testing raises the likelihood of identifying a given pathogen. PCR testing for enterovirus, adenovirus, CMV, parvovirus, and HHV-6 should be performed early in the evaluation for FUO.

The stool should be cultured if GI symptoms are present. Serial large-volume blood cultures should be obtained if endocarditis is a concern. A low threshold should exist for performing for lumbar puncture in patients who are ill appearing, have meningeal signs, or a history of symptoms involving the CNS. HIV antibodies should be obtained if risk factors exist for HIV, such as sexual activity or intravenous drug use. Specific testing for zoonotic or geographically specific infections should not be performed universally but only in cases as indicated by history.

Although antineutrophil antibodies are a poor screening test for all rheumatologic conditions, this test should be obtained if a concern for SLE exists. Because other collagen vascular conditions are made on a clinical basis, additional laboratory testing should not be used in a “shotgun” approach to rule out rheumatologic and autoimmune conditions (see Chapter 26).

Diagnostic Imaging

Imaging studies augment the diagnostic tools available in the evaluation of FUO. The potential benefit of imaging studies should always be weighed against the degree of radiation exposure to the patient. Plain radiographs are appropriate in the initial evaluation of localized limb pain. Contrast imaging of the GI tract is appropriate. Ultrasound technology has the benefit of being fast and painless, and it does not include radiation. The uses of ultrasound include initial abdominal imaging to identify fluid collections, masses, or lesions. Ultrasound is also useful for assessing joint fluid collections as well as superficial fluid collections or masses in the soft tissues. Echocardiography should be obtained in patients with a concern for endocarditis.

Cross-sectional imaging such as CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide superior anatomic detail. CT can be performed quickly and can provide anatomic detail for large sections of the body at once. The major disadvantage of CT imaging is the high radiation exposure to the patient. MRI is highly sensitive for detailing anatomic lesions, and it does not involve radiation. However, MRI takes longer to perform, and young children often require sedation to maintain one position during the entire scanning process.

CT is the imaging modality of choice for sinusitis. CT of the head can identify structural abnormalities, such as ventriculomegaly, tumors, or abscesses. MRI of the brain is more sensitive for identifying small lesions and inflammatory processes in the brain parenchyma. CT scanning is also useful for imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis for masses, fluid collections, lesions, or adenopathy. CT of the abdomen with oral contrast can also assess the GI tract for bowel wall thickening, fistulae, or other signs of IBD. MRI is especially useful in the assessment of localized bony tenderness to rule out osteomyelitis.

Nuclear medicine studies, such as bone scans and PET scans, may be used when no localizing signs are present. This technology uses tagged tracers that are introduced to the body on a biologically active molecule, such as a glucose analogue. Full-body imaging is then performed to identify regions of tracer uptake that indicate increased metabolic activity. These regions often correlate with infectious or malignant processes. Bone scans may be used if limb pain or limp is present but no focal tenderness is identifiable to localize for MRI scanning or to survey the entire body for occult osteomyelitis. PET scanning may be used to identify regions within the entire body with increased cellular activity. Although these studies may help initially localize regions of interest, they provide no anatomic detail. They are therefore often used in conjunction with CT.