Family and Cultural Care of the Critically Ill Patient

Published on 07/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 5 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 3499 times

8 Family and Cultural Care of the Critically Ill Patient

Introduction

Care of critically ill patients is complex and multifactorial. Although management of the haemodynamic parameters and healthcare interventions is an essential component of effective care of the critically ill, the psychosocial health and wellbeing of patients are intimately related to their wellness and eventual illness outcome. There is a tendency, due to the technologically complex nature of nursing in critical areas, for novice nurses to focus their attention on the management of medical treatment regimens. This is an important part of their learning trajectory. However, nurses need to be guided to see beyond the waveforms and physical parameters to see the patient in the bed as an individual with unique needs. The previous chapter examined specific aspects of the psychological wellbeing of the critically ill with strategies to improve patient outcomes. This chapter extends the focus to incorporate the family into the caring paradigm and introduces the concept of family-centred care. Nursing practices that incorporate the patient’s family into the care of the critically ill acknowledge the vital part families play in the illness continuum.

The assessment, understanding and incorporation of the patient and families’ cultural needs are essential elements of nursing the critically ill, and involve the entire multidisciplinary team. These elements are important for both the recipients of the care (the patient and family) and the critical care nurse, as the practice of nursing all aspects of the patient’s wellbeing brings humanity into critical care nursing. Cultural factors include social factors and human behaviours associated with emotional and spiritual needs.1 In this chapter, models of nursing are examined with particular reference to the philosophy of family-centred care, which may be an appropriate nursing model for use within critical care settings. The specific needs of the families of critically ill patients are discussed, also the implications for critical care nursing. The differing world views on health and illness are highlighted for consideration of appropriate care. Effective communication is crucial to meet both family members’ needs and those of the patient. The complexity of patient communication together with the addition of linguistically diverse patients is outlined and suggestions for clinical practice provided. End-of-life care is discussed in general terms and specific cultural considerations are highlighted with particular reference to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people of Australia and New Zealand Māori patients and families.

Overview of Models of Care

The way that nurses manage their daily activities and patient care is affected by both the critical care unit’s model of care delivery and the nurse’s personal philosophy of what and how nursing is constructed. Alternative models of care are examined in this section and their use in critical care areas discussed. Nursing models define shared values and beliefs that guide practice. Various philosophies and models of nursing care delivery have evolved over the decades and contrast with the ‘medical model’, which focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of disease.2 Models such as primary nursing and team nursing include organisational or management properties, whereas client- or patient-centred practice is another model in which a partnership relationship is developed between health professionals and the patient.38 Patient empowerment is a key benefit of this philosophy.8 However, a shared partnership with the patient may be problematic in critical care, where critical illness restricts patient involvement in decision making and care planning.9 In reality, it is generally family members who provide the link between the patient and healthcare team.

During the 1980s, the role of the family was one focus of nursing debate and discussion. Friedman believed families were the greatest social institution influencing individuals’ health in our society.10 A worldwide trend is for health professionals to value the role of family members in providing ongoing, post-acute care11 with the reality that families provide considerable support during rehabilitation phases of critical illnesses.12,13 The family is strongly incorporated within the philosophies of the professionally-centred model and family-centred model. The professionally centred model is patient- and family-focused, but the nurse or doctor decides on what is needed rather than involving the family and patient in identifying their actual needs.14 The professionally-centred model retains a component of paternalism, as health professionals act from their own perspective, rather than as a result of a shared decision-making process. The emphasis of this model, when used in the context of nursing, centres on autonomous nursing decision making, albeit in an environment of collaboration with other healthcare providers. It espouses the requirement for accountable practice and respect for individuals and their right to make decisions.15 In contrast, the family-centred model shares the responsibility with the family and aims to meet their needs. Whichever model is selected, it must be practical in the clinical setting for which it is intended.2

Family-Centred Care

The family-centred model of care, developed during the early 1990s, primarily in North America, in the area of children’s nursing, considered incorporating the family was fundamental to the care of the patient.16 Over the past two decades, the scope and extent of family-centred care has broadened and the Institute for Family-Centered Care defines family-centred care as ‘an innovative approach to the planning, delivery, and evaluation of healthcare that is governed by mutually beneficial partnerships among healthcare providers, patients and families’.17 Patient-and-family centred care applies to patients of all ages, and it may be practised in any healthcare setting.

Family-centred care is founded on mutual respect and partnership among patients, families and healthcare providers. It incorporates all aspects of physical and psychosocial care, from assessment to care delivery and evaluation.18 Healthcare providers that value the family/patient partnership during a critical illness strive to facilitate relationship building and provide amenities and services that facilitate families being near their hospitalised relative.19 When a clinical unit’s staff embrace a family-centred care philosophy and partner with families and make changes to the physical environment such as improved privacy and aesthetically pleasing decor, it can have the added advantage of positive culture changes for the staff. This indicates there is a benefit beyond the family members for whom the changes were initiated.20

In trying to understand family-centred care, neonatal and paediatric ICU studies have focused on parents’ perception of care in the three key components of family-centred care: respect, collaboration, and support.2123 In the area of respect, families rated ‘feeling welcome when I come to the hospital’ and ‘I feel like a parent, not a visitor’ most highly.21 Within the area of collaboration, feeling well prepared for discharge and being given honest information about care were rated the highest. The familiarity of nurses with the special needs of patients was rated highest in the area of support.21

Strategies to improve family-centred care within adult critical care areas include involving family members in partnering with the nursing staff to consider the involvement they would like which may include providing fundamental care to their sick relative.24 Family members can decide in consultation and negotiation with the bed-side nurse the care that they want, and are able to provide; this may vary from moisturising their relative’s skin to a full sponge and will require negotiation. This act of caring allows family members to connect in what they see as a meaningful way with their sick relative. In addition, it can also improve communication with critical care nurses and facilitate close physical and emotional contact with their relative.25 An independent nursing intervention such as partnering with family to provide care provides an understanding of how to operationalise a family-centred care model in the clinical setting and assists in the evaluation of other future interventions directed to improve an area’s family-centred approach. Further research on the benefits of family-centred care is needed in all critical care areas.24,26,27

It is greatly acknowledged that taking care of critically ill patients requires considerable knowledge and skill. When family members are incorporated into the caring paradigm, as advocated within family-centred care, health professionals equally need specific knowledge and skills.28 This should be initiated in foundation degrees, postgraduate studies and via ongoing professional development opportunities.28 A feature of family-centred care that makes it desirable in the critical care setting is how it strives to meet the needs of family.21

Needs of family during critical illness

Family members of critically ill patients contribute a significant and ongoing involvement to patients’ well being. Patients need and want their family members with them29 and health care professionals also need their input.30 Family members’ satisfaction with the care their relative receives is considered a legitimate quality indicator in many areas which routinely assess family satisfaction.31,32

On a very practical level within a critical illness situation, family members are often the decision makers on treatment options due to the impaired cognitive state of the patient. Their contribution to health care decisions is sought in both acute and ongoing care situations as they have insight and knowledge of the patient on an entirely different level to health professionals.33 In addition, family members provide not only support in the critical illness situation, but also continuity of care through rehabilitation. This responsibility together with the often sudden critical illness situation creates stress and anxiety for family members.34 A primary aim of family-centred care is to reduce the risk of stress related reactions to the ICU experience that is often traumatic for family members.35

Stress and anxiety associated with having a critically ill relative can hinder a family’s coping ability, adaptation, decision making36 and long-term health with the possibility that post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may develop in family members of ICU patients.35 Families that experience stress before the critical illness do not cope as well, and may need additional assistance.37 As many as half of family members report symptoms of anxiety and depression, indicating it is a very real problem.38 These figures are concerning particularly when symptoms continue beyond six months post ICU.35,39 In addition, post-traumatic stress symptoms are also reported by family members which is consistent with a moderate to major risk of PTSD, resulting in ongoing health-related concerns for the family members.35 Early identification and preventions strategies are an important area for further research.35,40 Meeting the needs of families during this stressful and demanding time has the capacity to reduce their stress and promote positive coping strategies.

A combined healthcare team approach is needed to meet the family’s needs, as differing perceptions among the healthcare team can result in non-unified approaches41 that are potentially confusing. The needs of families with critically ill relatives are complex and multifactorial, reinforcing the need for an all-of-team approach.41 Family members’ needs were recognised in Molter’s influential study in 1979 where she researched the specific needs of ICU patients’ family members. Although Molter’s sample was small (n = 40), 45 potential needs of family members were identified and ranked in order of importance.42 Family needs continue to be researched34,4348 and can be generally grouped into the need for (a) information, (b) reassurance, (c) closeness, (d) support, and (e) comfort.36 More specifically, families’ needs include the following:36

Meeting information needs

Families’ needs for information and reassurance are paramount during a critical illness, which is often unexpected or unexplained. Seven out of the top ten needs of families are related to information needs.49 When information is provided, it is important to spend sufficient time with family members.50 The information has to make sense to them and it is imperative that health care professionals check their understanding.44 It is not sufficient to think, But I told them all that yesterday. Communication is a two-way process and as such needs to be received in a meaningful way as well as given appropriately. Repeated and current information is suggested as it helps to reduce family members’ anxiety.44 In a case study report of a mother with her adult war-injured son, the mother tells how she tried to remember things the staff told her. She said, ‘I loved how my questions would be answered when we asked (except for the daily one about his brain damage) and how most people did not take offense at me writing down everything. I know that I was scared to death most of the entire time’.34, p. 18

Strategies to improve communication with family members include nurse-led education sessions designed to identify and meet the needs of family members. Once the needs have been identified, a specific program can be developed to meet the needs. This strategy was found to be effective when two one-hour sessions were conducted with family members who reported significantly lower levels of anxiety and higher levels of satisfaction.45 Other units may choose to have a designated critical care nursing position in their unit which focused on family advocacy within a family-centred care philosophy.51

Multidisciplinary patient rounds that meaningfully include the family show an inclusive and open communication process that values all contributors as they make an individual plan of care for the patient.34 Alternatively, consider routine family meetings with the healthcare team aimed at improving communication and understanding.46,47 Frequently, family meetings are called when the family is needed to make critical decisions about the ongoing care of their relative rather than as a proactive and positive strategy that allows for patient and family preferences to be integrated into patient care.47

It is suggested that a family conference with the interdisciplinary team should be organised in a staged and planned manner with the first occurring within the first 48 hours of admission; the second after three days, and a third when there is a significant change in treatment goals.49 Fundamental topics for the interdisciplinary meetings with the family could include the patient’s condition and prognosis together with short- and long-term treatment goals.31 Family conferences provide time for discussion amongst the family with the health care team as a resource and also for the team to make an assessment of the family’s understanding of the situation. In addition, it provides an opportunity to develop an awareness of specific family needs which the team can endeavour to meet.31 Unhurried family conferencing allows for opportunities for families to pose questions and longer family conferences can result in families feeling greater support and significantly reduced PTSD symptoms.53 Although family conferencing has been found beneficial, it is advocated that multiple modes of communication and information sharing are required. Leaflets and brochures that have either individualised or set information are also helpful.31,52,53

To promote communication, nurses can discuss with the family whether they would like a phone call at night updating them on their relative’s condition. Alternatively, nurses can give them a time to phone before change of shift. This will help to allay their anxiety and promotes positive communication and trust. When patients are transferred from critical care, families and patients may become anxious or concerned by the reduced level of care in the new ward area. This can be alleviated by providing families with verbal and individualised written transfer information as a means to help prepare them for transfer.54 In addition, a structured transferring plan helps critical care nurses feel better equipped to ensure they give families the information they need at this important time of transfer.55

Visiting practices

One of the primary needs of families is listed as a need to be physically close to their sick relative. Patient confidentiality and privacy remain central and need to be balanced with family presence.56 Patients find that family provides a link with their pre-illness self and provide support and comfort.57

Family-friendly policies with few restrictions that centre on genuine patient care issues require the support of critical care nurses and medical officers for them to work effectively.58 Flexible visiting policies have been found to improve quality indicators with higher patient and family satisfaction levels and fewer formal complaints.59 Restrictive visiting policies limit families’ access to their relatives and restrict their involvement. Family members are different from other visitors in critical care areas because of their intimate relationship, which helps to form crucial components of the patient’s identity.6062 Remember that there are often different meanings or interpretations of ‘family’, with it often meaning’s more than just the immediate nuclear family (e.g. the Māori whānau [extended family]). Negotiation of visiting processes that take into account these cultural understandings is imperative.

There is a genuine concern by some parents or carers that children should not visit family members who are critically ill as they may find the ICU environment and visit traumatic. This, however, is not the case when children are appropriately supported in visiting a critically ill close family member; they are more likely to be not frightened but rather curious of their surroundings.28 Children may have questions and it is recommended that they be prepared well with adequate information before, during and after their time with their relative in the critical care area.

Patients, however, may want visiting restricted as some patients find them stressful or tiring.13 Contrary to popular belief, unrestricted visiting hours is not associated with long visits. In two separate European studies where unrestricted visiting hours were introduced, the number of hours family members spent with the patient was low. They stayed for one to two hours per day and usually came during the day. This suggests that when family members have free access to their sick relative they do not perceive a sense of duty to be there all day and night.63,64

Barriers that restrict family presence require attention as family attendance is beneficial to the patient29 and a primary need for family members.36 Although some critical care staff indicate feeling performance anxiety with the family present during procedures29,65 or with extended family visits,13 many nurses are comfortable providing care with the family present.66 Staff who do not feel comfortable with this methodology require support and mentoring to facilitate this fundamental aspect of family-centred care.

Participating in patient care is one way for family members to feel closer to their critically ill family member57,67,68 and at the same time promote family integrity.67 Most family members, however, will not ask if they can help with care38 as this is seen as the nurses’ domain in adult critical care areas.69,70 Nurses therefore should invite family members to be part of the patient’s care, with massaging and providing a sponge being popular activities.24,69,70 Providing care allows the family members to feel connected emotionally with their relative and provides a means to get to know and communicate with the nurses which families consider important. Family members appreciate invitations from nurses as this allows them to feel more in control24 in a situation where family members do not often experience this.71,72

For family participation to work effectively and safely, a number of guiding principles should be incorporated, as outlined in Table 8.1. It is useful for critical care nurses to explore their beliefs and practices concerning family participation, as many support family participation but do not always implement these beliefs in their practice.73

TABLE 8.1 Family participation in patient care

Principle Procedure
Consent Gain patient consent beforehand where possible.
Building of trust Introduce the concept of family members’ involvement in care after a period during which a rapport is developed.
Individualise for patient and family Offer suitable options from which family members can choose: for example massaging feet and hands, cleaning teeth and feeding may be appropriate options for short-term patients, whereas additional options may exist for long-term patients.
Safety The registered nurse should remain physically close by at all times.
Promote achievement of goals Provide sufficient information to the family member to support successful completion of the care.
Reflect on outcomes Provide feedback to family members on how they performed the task.
Continuity of care Document the care the family members participated in and any relevant information.

Communication

The ability to communicate effectively is an underlying tenet of nursing practice and a fundamental need for people. As mentioned previously in the context of caring for family members, for communication to occur, there needs to be a two-way passage of ideas or information. In the patient context the inability to communicate causes, or adds to, anxiety, frustration and stress7476 as they lose control over their life and decisions.77 It is therefore imperative for health care professionals to find ways to communicate with patients. Critically ill patients commonly have communication difficulties due to either mechanical devices (e.g. endotracheal tubes),74 cognitive impairment from the disease and/or pharmacological medications or language difficulties.78 Therefore, effec-tive communication is challenging, and nurses need additional knowledge and understanding of these complex situations to meet medicolegal obligations and to assist in meeting the key information needs of patients and families.79 As many critically ill patients are unconscious, it is important to understand the need for verbal communication to continue. Such communication did not occur in one Jordanian setting where in-depth interviews and observations used in three critical care areas identified that nurses communicated less with unconscious patients than with conscious patients.80 It has been known for decades that sedated and unconscious patients can hear and recall some verbal communication once they regain consciousness.81,82

Meeting information needs builds trust between the nurse and patient and their family as a relationship develops.79 The nurse’s understanding of the person behind the patient is important to families, and can be achieved by talking to the family about the patient’s life before the illness.83

Good communication is a prime patient need and inspires patient confidence, making patients feel safe.84 When nurses reassure patients they provide a sense of hope and a feeling of safety, which is further supported by family members’ presence and the patients’ religious beliefs.77,84 Constructive strategies should be identified to overcome difficulties with patient communication. This is worthwhile pursuing as it reduces both nurse and patient frustration and improves nursing care.75 The following methods of communication may be used individually or together to enhance communication, and should be readily employed in critical care settings:74,85

Although electronic voice output communication aids are used with disabled children and adults, they have not been evaluated sufficiently with an ICU population. These aids use prerecorded digitalised voice messages or synthesised speech, with the phrases accessed by the patient via a computer screen or keyboard.85 This device would be restricted to those patients who are dexterous and able to select an appropriate key, which limits its utility in the ICU setting. However, some patients in a small study found electronic voice output beneficial, particularly when communicating with family.85

An effective strategy to promote good communication is for health professionals to seek and maintain eye contact (if culturally appropriate). This may mean the nurse or doctor sitting down on a chair beside the bed to facilitate face-to-face communication.79 This act also conveys a sense of the importance the health professional is placing on the interaction by taking time to ensure they understand each other. Associated with this is the need to use commonly understood language. One method of checking patients’ responses is to repeat these back to them. A quiet environment reduces extraneous noise and potential interruptions, and may promote communication and concentration. Codes may also be developed by the nurse and patient, with facial expression, head nods and eye blinks used to respond to questions.75 These codes should be passed on to the next nurse and recorded in the patient’s notes to promote continuity of care.

When communication seems unsuccessful, talking loudly will not improve the interaction; one good strategy is for the nurse and patient to agree to try again later.75 Communication can also occur through physical contact, and touch often communicates empathy and provides spiritual comfort.1 Spiritual needs may further be met by providing comfort, reassurance and respect for privacy, and by helping patients relate to others.86

Language barriers may necessitate the assistance of an interpreter with knowledge of healthcare terminology to ensure the content is adequately translated. An independent person ensures that the patient receives the message in its entirety from the health professional.79 Interviews with previously intubated patients after discharge from the ICU capture, from the patients’ perspective, issues with communication and highlight the need for further improvement and understanding of the two-way process. An example of this was from an ex-patient, who related her situation: ‘They would come into the room in masses to talk to me. One doctor would stand there and read off a summary: “[Subject’s name], we find her this and that”, and they’d be saying stuff and I’d think “Oh no!” They would ask me, “Do you understand?”, “Are there any questions?” And I … “I don’t even know what you just said; how do I know if I have questions or not?” ’.77 In this case, both parties were speaking to the other, but it was apparent that the patient was not able to take in and process the information about her current condition and therefore had difficulty comprehending. Basic principles of patient autonomy and respect need to be used cautiously with critically ill patients who may appear competent, when in reality their cognitive ability is impaired.9 Effective communication with the family is vital in order to determine the cultural beliefs and practices of patients and their family to further enhance communication and understanding.

Cultural Care

The challenge for critical care nurses is to establish positive working relationships with the patient (when possible) and the family so their important values, beliefs and practices can be shared and incorporated in plans of intervention and treatment. It is not always possible to ‘know’ another person’s culture in any great depth, or ‘know’ all cultural beliefs and practices of the patients and families a critical care nurse comes into contact with. Therefore, relationships with the patient and the family during their critical care experience are crucial, and also demonstrate both respect for, and valuing of, patients and their families and the cultural beliefs and practices they hold. This enables health teams to better meet their needs. While people’s ethnicities may provide a clue to their culture, it is not a reliable indicator and ignores the multiple cultural groups people belong to that extend beyond ethnicity, such as age and gender. Making assumptions about a person’s culture and reliance on universal approaches to direct nursing practice engenders risks to nursing practice and potentially compromises the outcomes of interactions and interventions. Even within cultural groups (e.g. indigenous and immigrant groups), variation in beliefs and practices can exist. Such differences result from factors such as colonisation, interactions with the various groups a person belongs to, and responses to societal changes, and the socialisation of immigrants into a new country. Thus, patient-centred, individualised care of patients and their families is imperative to incorporating specific cultural needs in the planning and delivery of interventions. This section outlines important strategies critical care nurses can develop for working with patients and their families to identify the essential beliefs and practices they need to have incorporated into treatment and intervention plans during a stressful time in an unfamiliar environment. Such actions can optimise their spiritual wellbeing and lessen some of the stress they feel.

Defining Culture

Wepa describes culture: ‘Our way of living is our culture. It is our taken-for-grantedness that determines and defines our culture. The way we brush our teeth, the way we bury people, the way we express ourselves through art, religion, eating habits, rituals, humour, science, law and sport; the way we celebrate occasions … is our culture. All these actions we carry out consciously and unconsciously’.87, p. 31 Simply, culture refers to the values, beliefs and practices that an individual, family members and nurses undertake on a daily basis. It determines how the world is viewed, and their orientation to health, illness, life and death.8890

Culture involves a shared set of rules and perspectives acquired through the processes of socialisation and internalisation, which provide a frame of reference to guide how members interpret such phenomena as health and illness and death and dying. This in turn influences their actions and interactions.91 Culture is a more specific way of describing how groups of people function on a daily basis, influenced by their beliefs, relationships and the activities they engage in.

Understanding that culture, ethnicity and race are not the same thing is crucial to meeting the cultural needs of patients and their families. Race is generally determined on the basis of physical characteristics and is often used to socially classify people broadly as Caucasians, Europeans, Polynesians or Asians, for example.87,92 However, assigning people to a homogeneous group is problematic, the antithesis of cultural diversity,87 and does not account for the diversity that exists within many groups in contemporary society. Ethnicity extends beyond the physical characteristics associated with race to include such factors as common origins, language, history and dress – it is usually associated with nations,87 although a number of ethnic groups may exist within a nation.

Differing World Views

Culture influences how people view the world, what they believe in and how they do things, particularly with regard to practices around health, dying and death. The critical care environment is unfamiliar for patients and families, especially as health professionals’ beliefs, practices and world views may not align with their own. What is important for critical care nurses may not be important for the patient or the family, and may lead to tension and dissatisfaction when the way patients’ and families’ views are at variance. This does not mean that one world view is necessarily more right or wrong – they are different.

The biomedical model influences the way healthcare services are structured and delivered.93 As a dominant model it heavily influences the necessary focus on the physical wellbeing of patients within critical care environments. Focusing on the management of disease and illness, and using processes that lead to health issues being fragmented and reduced to presenting signs and symptoms and diagnoses, risks excluding what is important for the patient and family.94 This contrasts with indigenous cultures, for example, which tend to have a holistic eco-spiritual world view, with a strong spiritual dimension that extends beyond a disease and illness focus.95 The world view of critical care nurses is influenced by the cultural beliefs, practices and life circumstances of each nurse, and the ‘world view’ of the critical care service that drives its service delivery. The result is that consequently, patients and their families become sandwiched between differing world views.

Research highlights the lack of alignment that can occur between the needs of consumers of health services and the intentions of healthcare providers such as nurses.96 It is the potential for the non-alignment between patients and families and healthcare providers that critical care nurse need to be aware of, as dissatisfaction with the care being delivered may arise when the patient’s and family’s needs are not recognised or attended to,97 leading to unnecessary tensions and conflicts between patients, families and nurses. A nurse’s willingness to acknowledge and respect patients’ world views and the things that are important to them minimises the occurrence of any dissatisfaction,94 as it values their specific needs during their critical care experience.

Where the world views of patients and families are considerably different from that of the nurse, Ramsden urges nurses to identify the beliefs they hold about the patient and family, the impact of these interactions on the patient and family, and the power the nurse can utilise during such interactions.98,99 Sometimes the nurse’s personal beliefs will be in conflict with professional nursing beliefs, which necessitates choosing between personal and professional beliefs in the practice setting. For example, a nurse’s personal beliefs about life, death and body tissues may be compromised by the duty to care for a patient with brain death awaiting the removal of organs for transplant. This may also be compounded by nursing staff shortages, less-than-desirable skill mixes, and the acuity and complexity that critical care nurses are faced with on a daily basis. Therefore, it is vital, not only for the individual nurse, but also for the team of critical care nurses to develop strategies that can optimise the development of working relationships with patients from different cultural backgrounds.

Cultural Competence

Different models exist to assist in the integration of the cultural beliefs and practices of patients and their family in critical care nursing practice. For example, Leninger’s cultural care diversity and universality theory89 requires nurses to deliver culturally congruent nursing care for people of varying or similar cultures. Ramsden’s work on cultural safety98,99 focuses on the delivery of nursing care to patients (whose cultural beliefs and practices differ from that of the nurse) that is determined appropriate and effective by the patients and families who are the recipients of that care. These models have been used to guide nursing practice in Australia and New Zealand, respectively. Such models require that critical care nurses recognise patients’ and families’ views of their health experience93 and any that subsequently have discordant priorities. Wood and Schwass have described three levels at which a nurse may practise with respect to cultural issues (see Table 8.2).100 These levels, ranging from cultural awareness to cultural safety, describe the differing characteristics of nurses’ cultural care. For example, a nurse practising in an organisation where cultural safety was required would need not only to recognise differences between groups of people, but also to deliver differing cultural care to individuals after undergoing appropriate education.

TABLE 8.2 Levels of cultural practice100

Level of cultural practice Indicators
1 Awareness Recognition that differences between groups of people extend beyond socioeconomic differences.
2 Sensitivity Recognition that difference is valid, which initiates a critical exploration of personal cultural beliefs and practices as a ‘bearer’ of culture that may affect others.
3 Safety Delivery of a safe service as a result of undergoing education about culture and nursing practice, and reflecting on their own and others’ practice.

From a transcultural nursing perspective, culturally competent nursing care requires the nurse to incorporate cultural knowledge, the nurse’s own cultural perspective and the patient’s cultural perspective into intervention plans.90 However, Ramsden argued that it is not possible to collate cultural knowledge specific to various groups owing to the diversity that exists both among and within groups.98 Therefore, critical care nurses are advised to critically examine theories and models to guide their practice, to ensure they deliver appropriate and effective care for the patients and families they work with.

Competence is an important dimension of nursing practice, as it provides users of nursing services with confidence in nurses’ knowledge, skill and attitudes necessary to undertake their practice. Given the importance of culture in the delivery of nursing care, the measurement of cultural competence is also important. There is evidence of numerous variations on the concept of cultural competence.101103 The attributes of cultural competence include cultural awareness, cultural knowledge, cultural understanding, cultural sensitivity, cultural interaction and cultural skill.101 However, the inherent need for the acquisition and use of culturally specific information limits the application of these attributes: the collation of culturally specific information is becoming increasingly problematic as our communities become more diverse in their composition.

Cultural competency is about practising in a sound manner rather than about behaving correctly.104 Durie encouraged the development of cultural safety (which focuses on the experience and determination of the appropriateness of care received), to a construct that can measure the capability of the health worker, such as the critical care nurse.104 Culturally competent nursing practice is about:

Cultural competence provides a framework to objectively measure the nurse’s performance. The ability of the critical care nurse to deliver culturally competent and safe care is dependent on determining the cultural needs of patients and families, and the provision of patient-centred, individualised care.

Determining the Cultural Needs of Patient and Family

The concepts of health and illness are generally constructed within the context of people’s sociocultural environment and the groups they belong to; these vary from person to person and group to group. To this end, culture influences how health and illness experiences are constructed and lived. When people become critically ill, their cultural beliefs and practices can be just as important as their physical health status.105 Yet cultural beliefs and practices are often compromised when healthcare providers’ concern about physical health takes precedence – invariably, health services also do things differently than patients and families would do them. While the importance of psychosocial and cultural needs is the focus of this chapter, the presence of life-threatening events or crises experienced by the patient in critical care must rightfully take precedence. However, on stabilisation of the patient, creating a positive working relationship with the family can facilitate the determination of their perspectives and needs and negotiation about how these can be included in a potentially complex plan of care. Incorporating cultural requirements becomes vital in a delivery of nursing care that is both appropriate and acceptable. Therefore, given the nature of critical care settings, the quality of interactions with the patient’s family is just as crucial as interactions with the patient.

Promoting a genuine, welcoming atmosphere and the use of effective communication invites the family to be involved early in the patient’s critical care experience, and is essential to determine the cultural needs of the patient and family. While communication has been mentioned earlier, interpreting cultural needs requires the critical care nurse to be attentive to communication. Nurses are advised to talk less, attend to details that may arise, and simply listen. The need to intervene and to dominate discussions and ‘interviews’ with the family107 from the nurse’s perspective needs to be curbed, so time is made available for cultural beliefs and practices to be shared.20,94,105 Understanding and supporting the patient and family can be improved by the nurse’s empowering them through the processes of listening, understanding and validating what they have to say.106,107 Conning and Rowland’s research on the attitudes of mental health professionals towards management practices and the process of assessing patients and decision making found that those who had a greater ‘client orientation’ (versus management orientation) were more likely to engage in assessment processes that facilitate patient-centred, individualised care.108

Working in partnership with a family can bridge the cultural ‘gap’. However, this is not always easy to achieve in challenging situations, such as when various members of a large family come and go, compounded by changing nurses with shift changes. Receiving clear and consistent messages about the patient, including his/her progress from all members of the health care team, can reduce cross-cultural confusion and misunderstanding, especially as messages are prone to distortion and change when many are involved. A strategy to manage this may involve discussing the management of information dissemination with the family, and the identification of one or two family members who become the point of contact through which staff discuss and communicate information about the patient.94 Often apparent ‘cultural conflicts’ will arise as a result of communication problems with the family; communicating information in a clear and understandable manner helps prevent these problems from occurring.

Individualised Care

‘Individualised care requires the patient and nurse to work together to identify a path towards health that maintains the integrity of the patient’s sense of self and is compatible with their personal circumstances’.109, p. 46 This means the critical care nurse ideally working in partnership with the family to identify important cultural beliefs and practices that need to be observed during the patient’s critical care experience; in other words eliciting a patient’s view to individualise care.110 It is recognised that ‘the work’ of the nurse involves responding, anticipating, interpreting and enabling, all of which are crucial for individualised care.111 Indeed, partnership requires the nurse not only to work with the patient and family but also to identify the power that the nurse possesses and the potential for its inadvertent misuse.94

Facilitating the inclusion of cultural beliefs and practices requires them to be identified and then incorporated in an individualised plan of care. However, given the resource constraints and the culture of some health services, universal approaches to planning care may be adopted for convenience. The critical care nurse is discouraged from adopting a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to nursing practice, as this disregards the cultural systems of the patient and family.94 Individualised care is optimised by nurses having sufficient information about the patient and family in order to identify the needs and plan interventions. Incorporating each family’s cultural beliefs and practices provides a ‘bigger picture’ of the patient105 than would have been gained by simply focusing on the presenting disease or illness and its management. Such an approach to individualised care enables the critical care nurse to become familiar with the context of the patients’ life circumstances and how they interpret illness, and also improves the quality of care and interactions they have with patients and families.112,113

Sometimes the nurse will want to have a full understanding of a cultural belief or practice before being willing to incorporate it. For example, several years ago a Māori patient was dying and the family wanted to organise the patient’s expedient removal from the hospital environment on the patient’s death. This was necessary so that the spiritual and cultural grieving processes could be commenced. But the nurse blocked the family’s desire to plan and organise a prompt postmortem on death because the patient had not yet died. This created unnecessary tension and conflict between the nurse and the family. Clearly the nurse’s and the family’s beliefs about death and dying were different, and the apparent position of ‘power’ adopted by the nurse did not encourage communication and negotiation about how this situation could be resolved to the satisfaction of both parties. This is an example of where the identification and acceptance of cultural beliefs and practices of the family (to the extent that they will not deliberately harm the patient), and working with the family on how these are incorporated in an intervention plan, can be beneficial to all parties. Once this has occurred, it is crucial this information is documented thereby making visible the patient’s individualised care.114

Working with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Patients and Families

Globalisation has resulted in increasing immigration and migration in both Australia and New Zealand, thus populations are increasing in their cultural and linguistic diversity. In 2006 Australians and New Zealanders comprised 24% and 20%, respectively, of peoples who were born overseas. Immigrants arrive from various countries globally, but especially the European, Asian and African continents. Labels assigned to groups of ‘immigrants’, such as Asians, are misleading and far from the homogeneity they infer. Added to the complexity of trying to determine ways of working with culturally and linguistically diverse patients and families is the variation in their degree of acculturation – for example, some may be second- or third-generation Australian- or New Zealand-born and highly acculturated into the respective culture, or they may be new immigrants with traditional cultural beliefs and practices. Therefore, given this diversity it is difficult to provide specific guidelines on working with culturally and linguistically diverse patients and their families, although some common principles exist.

A fundamental starting point for working with culturally and linguistically diverse patients is to establish their capacity to communicate in English. Determining the language a patient uses on a daily basis and whether they can speak and write in English, will indicate whether an interpreter is needed. Family members or friends can be used as interpreters when care is being undertaken on a daily basis, although a professional or accredited interpreter should be used when important information is to be shared or when decisions need to be made. This avoids the potential for family members or friends ‘censoring’ the information conveyed during discussions. How the patient prefers to be addressed, cultural values and beliefs related to communication (e.g. eye contact, personal space or social taboos), preferences related to health care providers (that is culture, gender or age), the nature of family support, and usual food and nutrition are other areas that should be explored with the patient or family, whichever is appropriate.

Given the great diversity that occurs within contemporary cultural groups, it is crucial to develop a relationship so important cultural values, beliefs and practices can be identified and incorporated into the patient’s plan of care. Critical care nurses can then better understand patients’ or families’ behaviours when the patient is critically unwell. Discovering the values and beliefs patients and their family have about health, illness, death and dying, and what they believe may make their health worse, is a good starting point, and will provide insight into the type of support and caring behaviours that may be observed. In addition to this, identifying how health and illnesses are managed will provide an indication of whether traditional healers are used, along with healing remedies, such as herbs and prayer for example. Also understanding the patient’s locus of control can also provide an indication of whether they will play an active role in the outcome of an illness, or whether there is a fundamental belief that illnesses are caused by some external force.

For many cultural groups the presence of family is vital to both the patients’ and family’s spiritual wellbeing. Therefore, facilitating family presence at the patient’s bedside and possibly including them in the care of the patient is important. For some cultures there is a belief that family members should shoulder the burden of information and decision making so the patient can expend their energy and focus on getting better. In some cases to burden the patient with information about their condition, especially its gravity, or having to make decisions, is believed to contribute to a negative outcome. Thus, positively engaging families and where practical patients in collaborative relationships, involving them in the care and decision making, and ensuring their cultural values, beliefs and practices are protected, are ways critical care nurses can respect the cultural traditions of those patients who are from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds.

Campinha-Bacote’s115 mnemonic, ASKED, provides a process for self-reflection to make explicit your knowledge and skills and desires to work with people who are culturally and linguistically diverse. The following questions can be asked:

By critical care nurses understanding their position on nursing people from other cultures, strategies can be adopted to improve their responsiveness and quality of care delivered. Working with culturally and linguistically diverse people should be based on the following framework:

Considerations when caring for indigenous people are reviewed in the next section. Closely related to cultural aspects of care is spirituality, which for some is based in religion. Aspects to consider when patients have religious needs are reviewed later in this chapter.

Beliefs around hospitali-sation and places to die Traditional healing Connections Elders Establishing relationships Diversity Language Women’s business and men’s business Relocation

The Treaty of Waitangi (commonly known as ‘the Treaty’) is based on an agreement between Māori and the Queen of England, Queen Victoria, which establishes the rights of Māori as tangata whenua, or people of the land. There are two versions of the Treaty – one in English and one in te reo Māori (Māori language). Māori understood that while they gave governorship to the Queen, under Article One of the Treaty, they would retain their right to control and self-determination over their lands, villages and taonga (which includes health) under Article Two. Under Articles Three and Four Māori are guaranteed protection and the same rights as British citizens, including the protection of beliefs and customs. Nurses working within the New Zealand health setting can be considered agents of the Crown,67,117 and therefore have a responsibility and obligation to honour the Treaty when working with Māori. The principles of partnership, participation and protection118 are used to apply the Treaty in practice within health settings such as critical care.

The commitment that critical care nurses have to establish, and maintain, a positive relationship with Māori patients and their families, is as important as being willing to facilitate the inclusion of cultural beliefs and practices in the care of the patient. Such a commitment can influence the outcome of the critical care experience for Māori patients and their whānau. It is not the purpose of this section to provide a ‘recipe’ for working with Māori in the critical care setting. An overview of the fundamental issues to consider, and the importance of critical care nurses establishing working relationships with local Māori health services and/or local iwi and Māori community groups, is stressed.

Māori have a collective, rather than an individual, orientation, with whakapapa and kinship having an important place.119 Reilly outlines the variations that occur in the contemporary social organisation of Māori.119 The whānau is the social group that critical care nurses will generally interact with. Turia stresses that whānau encompasses more than the common notion of the family.120 Whānau are inclusive and are made up of multiple generations, extending widely to include those who have ‘kinship’ ties. This contrasts with the ‘nuclear’ family concept. Elders, especially kuia (older respected women) and kaumatua (older respected men) possess mana (power, authority and prestige) and important status that commands respect. Because of the status of kuia and kaumatua in Māori society, if they become ill it is especially important for the whānau and wider Māori community to support them during this time.

Because of the collective orientation of many Māori, whānau support is exceedingly important. Thus, critical care nurses often have to explore how they manage relationships with large numbers of people within confined physical spaces, which may necessitate establishing relationships and identifying one or two people who will be the point of contact through which information can be communicated.105 Establishing connections and links can be a positive way of engaging with Māori patients and whānau; this is often called whanaungatanga, and Māori will do this by sharing their whakapapa, or genealogy. This means identifying where you have come from and who you are. It is crucial that the critical care nurse be able to demonstrate a genuine intent and a willingness to listen to what the whānau feel is important. Forming effective working relationships with Māori whānau can never be underestimated. It is also useful for critical care nurses to establish working relationships with Māori health services within their health service and to get to know the local Māori community.

Many Māori view themselves as spiritual beings,116,121 and ill-health may therefore be seen to have a spiritual as opposed to a physical cause. The way Māori interpret the world is a unique blend of cultural artefacts from the past and present, also the nature of their interactions within contemporary society.116 Despite the diversity that exists, many Māori have a world view that is holistic and eco-spiritual in nature.92,120 This holistic and spiritual world view interconnects the physical world and the world of others.120 Māori creation stories are cosmological in nature, and establish the link Māori have to the atua (gods) and tupuna (ancestors) who created the world and all living things through the separation of Ranginui (the ‘sky father’ in mythology) and Papatuanuku (the ‘earth mother’ in mythology).122 For some Māori, acknowledging atua and tupuna in karakia (ritual chants or prayer) is spiritually important, as well as maintaining their strong links to others and the land. Some Māori also have religious faiths originating from the processes of colonisation, and may include Christianity or the Māori-based Ratana and Ringatu faiths.121

The activities of individuals and groups of Māori that serve to control human activities and life, and maintain health and wellness, are restricted spiritually and practically (through rituals) by the concept of tapu (sacred or restricted).121,123 Breaches of tapu, while spiritual in nature, often manifest in physical forms such as illness. Often illness is seen as a failure to observe tikanga (custom) and tapu,121 and is known as makatu (a spell or curse) or mate Māori (sickness or death). Traditional healers and healing practices (such as the use of rongoa [medicine] and karakia [ritual chant or prayer]) play an important role in healing someone who is ill. Accessing traditional healers, such as a tohunga (expert), may be an important part of the critically ill person’s recovery or dying process. However, cultural expressions of spirituality differ among Māori, and for some, traditional cultural approaches may not be acceptable. The critical care nurse needs to identify the beliefs and practices related to wellbeing and illness.

There are some things that are done in one culture that are perceived to be offensive in another, and thus disrupt the formation of relationships. The concept of tapu (sacred or restricted), mentioned above, is also associated with the concept of noa (common), or to make ordinary. Thus, a person’s body, body fluids and body parts are considered tapu, whereas food is often used to make something ordinary. In practical terms this means that food should be kept separate from the person’s body and body fluids. For example, do not put urine in urinals or collecting chambers for faeces in pans on surfaces where food will be put. Body tissue and body parts and their disposal is a major consideration in the care of Māori. For some Māori, having their body parts and any tissues removed returned to them so they can bury them is spiritually important: they are returning these to Papatuanuku (the Earth Mother). However, again it is important to identify what is important for each patient and their whānau, as some Māori may not want their body tissue or parts returned to them.

Working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People of Australia

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples make up about 2.3% of the total population of Australia, although it is important to recognise that they are two distinct Indigenous groups each with their own cultural identity. Of the total population 90% identify as Aboriginal while 6% identify as Torres Strait Islander, and 4% identify as both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander.124 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people live throughout Australia – some live in discrete communities in remote areas whilst others live in rural or urban areas. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were forced off their traditional lands during colonisation and some have never returned. There are also the Stolen Generations who were removed from families and sent to missions often in other states or overseas.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people of Australia have some of the oldest living cultures in the world. Their culture is as dynamic and diverse as the areas in which they live. Their culture today is based on their rich spiritual connection to the land and to each other. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people lived in tribes, clan, skin and language groups. Contemporary Aboriginal society lives in a mixture of communities and families; some still live in old mission sites and homes and others live a traditional life.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people of Australia suffer a greater burden of social disadvantage and poor health than other groups of the Australian population. There is a well-documented gap in life expectancy between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people of Australia and other Australians. This gap is mainly due to diseases that are preventable, for example heart disease is three times more prevalent in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population than in the broad Australian population.125 As a result of this poor health status, many critical care nurses will come into contact with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Critical care nurses are placed in an ideal situation where the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and their families who are critically ill or dying can be positive whilst maintaining their cultural integrity.

Aboriginal view of health and health beliefs

Aboriginal people of Australia have a different view of health from the dominant Western view. This view incorporates notions of body, spirit, family and community.126 The patient-centred model described by Espezel and Canam15 fits nicely with the Aboriginal view of health. Described as far back as 1989 in the National Aboriginal Health Strategy,124 the Aboriginal view of health is a holistic view in which the sense of family is integral to the sense of oneself, which is in turn essential to health.127

The Aboriginal view of health and how Aboriginal people relate to the healthcare system influences the care given. The following are specific beliefs Aboriginal people have about health and medicine:

These are important points for nurses to understand, as these health beliefs may influence people’s perceptions and may be mistaken for non-compliance with medications, or feelings of doom and not wanting to get better. It is important to explore how traditional Aboriginal medicine and health beliefs can be used complementarily with Western medicine – a particularly important point for the palliative care of Aboriginal people.

Importance of family, community and land

Aboriginal people have a strong connection to family, community and the land they live on. Some Aboriginal people have a number of communities: the one they were born into, the one they move to, and the one they work in. There are a number of Aboriginal people who have never left their original community or land. The ties Aboriginal people have to their people and land are so strong that, rather than receiving lifesaving care, many prefer to refuse the treatment and die on the land that they belong in, with their family and community present.

There are members (elders) of the community who often speak on behalf of that community and its people. A similar approach occurs within families, where spokespeople speak on behalf of the family and its members. These spokespeople could be either male or female (brothers, sisters, ‘Aunties’ or ‘Uncles’), and spokespersons differ from community to community. Some Aboriginal communities have lores that dictate that only women talk (women’s business) or only men talk (men’s business). It is important that critical care nurses identify who is the spokesperson of the patient from the outset and who is the right person to talk to about all aspects of the patient’s care.

Often, Aboriginal people are transferred from remote or rural areas to major hospitals for specialist services. This can cause great anxiety for the patient, family and community and can often lead to the patient refusing care or transfer. It is important that the family be informed about the potential for relocation, that it is important and that the family be given time to talk it over. In reality, the importance of the family being able to spend as much time as possible with the patient cannot be underestimated. Having the opportunity to pass on knowledge through stories to family members is important for Aboriginal people. The critical care nurse can facilitate this by allowing the time and the space for this impor-tant storytelling to occur. However, financial constraints and geographical distance may make family visiting difficult.

The interface between critical care, the hospital and primary health care is a critical part of the patient’s journey. It is important that critical care teams have partnerships with their local Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services. This enables planning of care across the continuum, as Aboriginal people will often have follow-up visits with their local Aboriginal healthcare services.

Issues around death and dying

There are a number of important cultural factors surrounding death and dying relating to Aboriginal patients and families. Aboriginal people have a deep spiritual connection to the land, the country; this is part of their dreaming. The most important factor will be the need for the Aboriginal patient to go ‘back to country’, back to their traditional lands to die or to heal. The critical care nurse should allow time and facilitate discussion with the team around these issues and to also make sure that the relevant family or community member is present.

However, many times the Aboriginal patient will die in the critical care setting. If this happens there are certain protocols that need to be considered. Gender-appropriate care may be needed, as often male elders will not allow women into their room, and will request a male nurse to care for them. It is important to note that some Aboriginal communities do not allow health professionals to handle the body after death. The critical care nurse needs to discuss with the family issues that relate to handling of the body. Some Aboriginal communities do not allow the body to be cremated.

Aboriginal people have a distinct culture and health beliefs that can interfere with the Western view of medicine and health. It cannot be stressed enough that the integration of the patient’s culture into the critical care setting is important to achieving health gains. The critical care nurse needs to know the Aboriginal community or communities and develop relationships in order to improve the health experience of Aboriginal people.

This section has highlighted the importance of consideration of cultural differences in nursing care of the critically ill Aboriginal person, with important points summarised in Table 8.3. Some important cultural aspects that need to be taken into account are:

Religious Considerations

Religious beliefs and practices contribute to a person’s spiritual wellness on one hand, while on the other a critical care nurse’s religion may influence how care is delivered.129 Religion can be closely aligned with a person’s culture, and vary in how life, dying and death are viewed and may dictate how life is conducted.1,130,131 Any breaches can have profound affects on a patient’s wellbeing, and in some cases how family member may consequently interact with the patient. This has important implications for critical care nurses undertaking everyday practices, and common procedures where religious beliefs dictate a different approach. A common example is blood transfusions for those belonging to the Seventh Day Adventist religion. Having a standardised list of religions and procedural considerations is flawed due to the variations that exist, and in some instances the variations are great. Thus, as part of the initial assessment the critical nurse should determine whether the patient has religious beliefs and practices that must be observed or not, and incorporate these into the care plan.

When a family member becomes critically ill, religious beliefs and practices become an important coping mechanism in terms of making sense of the experience, as well as being a source of faith and hope. While it can be helpful to the critical care nurse to have an overview of the main religious beliefs and practices (see Table 8.4), caution must be used, and should not preclude working with the patient’s family to ascertain exactly what their beliefs and preferences are. The involvement of family requires critical care nurses to broaden their focus from the patient to include the family who are often ideal informants regarding the religious needs of the patient. Having said this, some patients have adopted religions separate from their family of origin, and in these circumstances family cannot be relied upon as informants, and in some situations there may be a conflict between the religious values and practices of the patient and those of the family. Religious beliefs and practices, like cultural beliefs and practices, will vary between orthodox or traditional and contemporary interpretations.

TABLE 8.4 Overview of key religious beliefs and practices132,165

Religion Practices to be aware of Beliefs about illness, life and death
Protestantism Prayer and the Bible are important for support. Minister, vicar or pastor may visit the sick person and the family. Illness is an accepted part of life, although euthanasia is not allowed. There is a belief in the afterlife, with the dead being buried or cremated.
Roman Catholicism Prayer and the Bible are important. Some may have restrictions on eating meat on Fridays of Lent, Ash Wednesday and Good Friday. Priest may undertake communion with and anoint the sick person. Illness is an accepted part of life, although euthanasia is forbidden. There is a belief in the afterlife, with the dead being buried or cremated.
Judaism There are orthodox and non-orthodox forms of Judaism. Procedures should be avoided on the Sabbath (from sundown on Friday to sundown on Saturday). Dietary restrictions around pork, shellfish, and the combination of meat and dairy products, extends to the use of dishes and utensils. Frequent praying, especially for the sick person who should not be left alone. The Rabbi will attend the sick person. Illness is an accepted part of life, with euthanasia being forbidden, thus prolonging life is important and those on life support stay on it until death. The Sabbath is a time that is considered sacred and when restrictions on activities are observed. There is a belief that the human spirit is immortal. There are special processes for managing the dead person, who should be buried as soon as possible after death. Thus, consultation with the Rabbi is important. Postmortem examination is allowed only if necessary.
Buddhism Prayer and meditation are important, using prayer books and scriptures, supported by teacher and Buddhist monks. The Buddhist is generally vegetarian. Patients may refuse treatments (e.g. narcotic medications) that alter consciousness. Illness originates from a sin in a previous life. There is a belief in afterlife, and the dead are buried or cremated. Living things should not be killed; this belief extends to euthanasia.
Hinduism Prayer and meditation are important, and are supported by a Guru. Some Hindus are vegetarian. The dying patient may have threads tied around the neck or wrist and be sprinkled with water; these threads are sacred and are not removed after death. The body is not washed after death. Illness is usually a punishment and must be endured. Some Hindus have healing practices based on their faith. There is a belief that the dead are reincarnated; they are usually cremated.
Islam (Muslims) Private prayer, facing Mecca several times a day, requires a private space. The patient may like to be positioned towards Mecca. Guided by the Qur’an (Koran), which outlines the will of Allah (the creator of all) as given through Muhammad (the prophet). Muslims fast during Ramadan, and eating pork and drinking alcohol is forbidden. Stopping treatment goes against Allah. Talking about death should be avoided; designated male relatives will decide what information patient and family should receive. Life and death are predetermined by Allah, and any suffering must be endured in order to be rewarded in death. It is believed that dying the death of a martyr will be rewarded in death by going to paradise. Thus, staying true to the Qur’an is crucial. There is a belief in the afterlife, and the dead are buried as soon as possible after death, on the side facing Mecca.

Patients generally fall into three groups with regard to their religious practices.132 There are those who:

All patients should have access to religious support where they indicate a need. Therefore, it is beneficial for critical care nurses to have knowledge of how to access the relevant religious resources if needed. The focus of the critical care setting often involves going to extreme lengths to keep patients alive, which may well be in direct opposition to some religious beliefs. Religious beliefs can either facilitate or disrupt the process of living or dying.130,131 There are a number of principles critical care nurses should underpin their practice with when nursing patients with specific religious needs (see Table 8.5).

TABLE 8.5 Principles for recognising religious needs

Principles Areas for consideration
Diversity exists between and within the various religions. Determine values and beliefs related to health, illness, dying, death, and any specific requirements for undertaking everyday nursing cares and procedures.
Spirituality is an essential part of care planning and the delivery of quality care. Spiritual and religious needs should be documented in the care plan to ensure continuity and quality of care.
Interpersonal skills and therapeutic use of self is essential to engaging and being present with the patient and family. Approaching the patient with a genuine, non-judgemental attitude.
Avoid imposing own religious or spiritual beliefs on the patient and family.
Being knowledgeable about a patient’s religious values about life, health, illness, death and dying enables the critical care nurse to be respectful and accommodates in their care.

Philosophies and policies should be cognisant of the cultural and religious diversity within the critical care patient population.

In addition to these principles, contact and communication with the critical care nurse is important,1 and can enable a person’s spiritual or religious needs to be determined. The critical care nurse needs to ascertain whether the patient and family have any spiritual or religious beliefs and practices to be observed during their time in the critical care setting.1,132 Once the spiritual or religious beliefs and practices have been determined, the critical care nurse can facilitate opportunities for the patient and/or family to carry out their beliefs and practices, and will importantly avoid any insensitive actions.132 In this way the critical care nurse can be sensitive to, and recognise, any spiritual distress evident in the patient and family members.

A person’s spirituality, whether informed by religion or some other basis, manifests in a variety of relationships with self, others, nature and ‘divine’ beings. It is the essence of who a person is, or who groups of people are. While assessing spiritual or religious needs is one aspect, presence and being with, empathetic listening, reality orientation of the family, and enabling visiting and contact are all important nursing activities that can support the spiritual and religious needs of patients and their families.1 When families are confronted with the possibility of death, the documentation of a death plan that outlines the preferred care during the process of dying and death is recommended.132 Death plans are about empowerment, and differ from advance directives, which outline what is not wanted (e.g. cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Through formal discussion with the patient and/or family, religious and end-of-life needs can be determined and a management plan developed for implementation.

End-Of-Life Issues and Bereavement

Over 80,000 Australians are admitted to critical care areas each year with a critical illness and although around 92% survive the critical illness, many still die in these areas.133 End-of-life questions and bereavement in critical care areas are therefore important issues involving patients, families and staff. Death can occur as a result of sudden decline in the patient’s condition, or as a result of withdrawal of life support in anticipation of demise. Patient death in critical care areas is found to have a significantly different effect on family members from a death in another in-hospital area.134 This is perhaps due to the heightened anxiety associated with a critical care environment134 or due to the perception of an ability to cure in highly medicalised areas.135 Where possible, family-centred decision making with patient involvement, together with effective communication and attention to symptom management, is optimal. Practical and emotional support for family and patients is important and scrutiny of the way we manage these important areas provide quality indicators for critical care areas.31,136

Patient Comfort and Palliative Care

Maintaining patient comfort and support for families and staff are primary requirements of nursing patients during the end stages of life. Advanced directives and ‘not for resuscitation’ orders should be in place to prevent mismanagement and understanding of patient care (see Chapter 5).31 Maintenance of patient comfort through care guidelines to facilitate a ‘good death in ICU’137 are designed to control symptoms such as agitation, pain and breathlessness and are extremely important from the patient, family and nurses’ perspective.138140 Although this may seem fundamental, there is evidence to suggest this is not always achieved, with 78% of over 900 North American critical care nurses perceiving that patients received inadequate pain medications ‘sometimes’ or ‘frequently’ during end-of-life nursing in critical care areas.141

Collaboration and early involvement by palliative care teams is one way to integrate end-of-life care for patients who either remain in critical care areas or are transferred from the unit to other areas.139 Withdrawal of mechanical ventilatory support requires adequate provision for management of potential agitation, pain and hypoxia.140 Opioid and benzodiazepine agents should be considered for administration before and after extubation to prevent agitation and pain. Choices of bolus or infusion administration need to be based on patient comfort issues. Oxygen therapy is continued in the most appropriate form, and an oral airway may improve patient comfort and aid secretion clearance. Atropine and scopolamine have been reported to successfully reduce copious oral secretions and enhance comfort.142

The attainment of humane nursing care must include heightened efforts in achieving quality indicators, such as mentioned above – adequate management of pain and nausea, agitation and restlessness. Both critical care staff and families should continue to communicate with the patient by speaking and touching as this can have a calming influence. Comfort measures to enhance holistic care delivery should continue and may include:

Patient dignity should be a priority, with gowns or personal attire essential elements of care. The management of symptoms further allows patients to maintain their dignity. Privacy for patients and their families allows an opportunity for them to communicate without the constraints of observers.143 As indicated in previous sections of this chapter, patient and family culture, beliefs and spiritual values are important considerations that underpin care.137

Family Care

Care of the family is supported by proactive palliative care interventions that include empathic, informative communication with interdisciplinary team meetings and family conferences that are not rushed where families are integral to decision making and goal planning.31,52,144 The desire to participate in decision making varies from family to family, and cannot be assumed. Ascertaining individual families’ needs for decision making is therefore recommended145 as families are best placed to have an understanding of patients’ wishes, which can be taken into account when decisions are made.146 Structured communication between the health care team and families can assist with earlier decisions and goal formation about care.147 Emotional and practical support can be given to families by providing written material about the critical care area, local facilities and specific information on bereavement.52 Privacy is not always possible in the busy critical care environment, but maximising efforts in this regard for dying patients and their families provides a more conducive environment for strengthening patient–family relationships and communication.148

While the family grapple with some or all of the five stages of grief defined by Kubler-Ross: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance,149 nurses need to provide the physical and psychological care for patients and families.150 This can be achieved when there is patient and family-centred decision making, good communication, continuity of care, emotional and practical support; and spiritual support can assist with this.151 Individualising the care to the family is essential, and support measures should be instituted after a full assessment of their needs. Without support, abnormal grief reactions can occur, which decreases the family’s ability to cope with everyday needs and may progress to unresolved grief.152

The detrimental effects of long-term unresolved grief after the death of a loved one are well documented. Current terminology favours the term of prolonged grief disorder (previously called complicated grief) which has clinically disabling grief symptoms including, amongst others: a preoccupation with thoughts of the loss; avoidance of reminders of the loss; disbelief over the person’s death; feeling lonely since the loss; feeling that the future holds no purpose; and feeling stunned or shocked by the loss.153 These symptoms can result in elevated morbidity and mortality levels associated with depression, cardiac events (including a higher risk of sudden cardiac death), hypertension, neoplasms, ulcerative colitis, suicidal tendencies, and social dysfunction (including alcohol abuse and violence).154 These potentially harmful outcomes provide strong motivation for critical care clinicians to initiate family support mechanisms such as bereavement services.139 Bereavement programs aim to reduce the immediate physical and emotional distress for those grieving, while improving the long-term morbidity associated with unresolved grief.155

Although critical care clinicians in the UK,156 USA,139 Europe and Canada145 are conducting dialogue and developing guidelines for bereavement care in critical care, little evidence-based research has been conducted on bereavement care strategies.139 An exception is a bereavement program developed by a group of nurses from a British ICU, who instituted a booklet on ‘coping with bereavement’, an after-care form for the clinical nurse to complete with details for follow-up with the family, and a sympathy card and letter inviting family to participate in support group meetings.156 Although initial evaluation of the program through feedback from participating family members was positive, the team acknowledges that this does not constitute rigorous research. Evaluation of bereavement services in Australian adult ICUs was also reported to be inadequate, as no data could be located concerning bereavement services in other areas of critical care. Only 30% of ICUs provided some follow-up care, and only four units had any evaluation other than anecdotal evidence.157 It is imperative to assess new and existing bereavement interventions and how well they meet the needs of families through rigorous evaluation. Legitimising research on this vulnerable group is required to improve end-of-life care for families and patients.156

Care of the Critical Care Nurse

The two previous sections have focused on care for the dying patient and the patient’s family. Critical care nurses who care for both patients and families also require care in bereavement situations. Caring for dying patients is emotionally draining and highly demanding of the critical care nurse, who often fails to notice or acknowledge the need to grieve.158,159 In addition, critical care nurses may not have the knowledge and understanding of palliative care and death in the critical care environment and a specific educational program and unit guidelines on palliative care may provide support and reduce burnout.137,139

Once the patient has died, nurses may not have the opportunity to mourn publicly and may feel they are acting unprofessionally if they show overt signs of grief.158 Dealing with the death of patients may be exacerbated in some critical care environments, particularly in the rural setting, where the nurse may know the patient outside the work environment. Collaboration with colleagues from oncology areas or palliative care teams will provide guidance and support to critical care nurses as they develop better organisational and emotional support for each other.160 Effective palliation occurs when the multidisciplinary team, including senior management, collectively develops a philosophy for palliative care and bereavement services.151,139

Nurses depend on colleagues and friends for support when patients die, and value debriefing sessions.156 ‘Debriefing’ sessions can have a number of interpretations. For example, ‘debriefing’ in critical care often takes the form of an opportunity to share feelings. Alternatively, it may be for a procedural clinical review of events where the objective is to understand and learn from the situation.160 Both components of debriefing are important, together with the opportunity to provide mutual support within the multidisciplinary team. The effectiveness of sessions should be evaluated.

A ‘grief team’ provides more formalised support from colleagues that have been given additional education on grief, dying and death.158 This enables a program of care, and may include such strategies as assessing the welfare of the staff immediately after the death of the patient; being present for staff members to express their feelings; providing follow-up and information on coping mechanisms during grief.158 Accessing experts from outside the unit’s usual resources may be helpful with de-briefing in especially challenging situations.160 Dealing with death is never easy; however, an awareness of colleagues’ needs is a key to providing the support they require.

Summary

The psychosocial, cultural and religious needs of critically ill patients and their families are just as important as their physical needs, and care needs to be taken not to overlook these. This chapter presents a holistic and patient- and family-centred approach to practice, which enables individualised plans of care that includes specific psychosocial, cultural and religious needs of critically ill patients and their families. Indigenous Māori, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients generally have a holistic and spiritual world view, and consequently have specific cultural practices that are vital to their spiritual wellbeing. Culturally and linguistically diverse patients and families also have specific cultural values, beliefs and practices that critical care nurses need to determine, which may involve the assistance of an interpreter. These patients require the critical care nurse to interact with them in a manner that facilitates the identification of their needs on an individual basis. The old adage ‘actions speak louder than words’ is worthy of consideration when working with these patients in the critical care setting. It is important that individual plans of care be developed that include the participation of Māori, Aboriginal and culturally and linguistically diverse patients and whānau or family, reflecting the beliefs and practices that need to be included in their critical care experience. In order to meet the needs of the critically ill patient and family, the critical care nurse is advised to identify personal beliefs, practices and expectations that may influence professional decision making and interactions with the patient and family.

Case study

A 56-year-old woman, Mrs Supitayaporn, has been admitted to the critical care unit with a severe head injury, following being struck by a car while she was out walking. She also has a fractured humerus and pelvis. A decision has been made for surgical intervention to relieve her increasing intracranial pressure (ICP). Just as the critical care nurse is preparing her for surgery, her family arrives. It is explained that Mrs Supitayaporn needs urgent surgery to stabilise her condition and prevent further deterioration. During this process it becomes clear that Mrs Supitayaporn’s husband does not understand what is happening.

The critical care nurse asks if any of the family members speak English, and a son steps forward. The critical care nurse also asks if there are any important beliefs or practices Mrs Supitayaporn has that should be considered prior to going to surgery, and in the planning of her care. Mrs Supitayaporn belongs to the Buddhist faith, and it is important that her family are present to ensure her mind is put at peace, and to tell her about her merits. It is also important for her to be in an environment that is quiet and unhurried. The son informs the critical care nurse that they believe strongly in the law of karma, and Mrs Supitayaporn should not be resuscitated. The critical care nurse realises she does not know much about the Buddhist faith, and endeavours to find a local Buddhist monk to help staff understand Mrs Supitayaporn’s faith. As a first contact, the critical care nurse approaches the hospital chaplain for advice on how to contact a Buddhist monk.

Discussion

This critical care nurse has identified early the need for an interpreter in order for Mrs Supitayaporn’s husband to understand the information about his wife’s condition and impending surgery. The son indicated he could speak English, and while in the short-term he could be used as an interpreter, in the long-term a professional interpreter should be sought. This removes the pressure from the son having to convey information between the critical care nurse and the Mrs Supitayaporn’s husband. It is clear that the nurse has engaged in genuine communication, and is working with the family – the beginnings of a partnership. A feature of this critical care nurse’s communication is her willingness to listen and understand the information the son was sharing. In the course of this discussion the critical care nurse discovers information related to Mrs Supitayaporn’s religious faith, and at the same time realises she knows little about the Buddhist faith. However, she has determined the need for a quiet environment, the importance of the family being present, and the patient’s beliefs about karma and the potential impact this will have on her treatment and intervention. This information should be documented in Mrs Supitayaporn’s clinical file for continuity and quality of care. The critical care nurse is also attempting to make contact with a Buddhist monk to become better informed about this faith. This case study demonstrates the beginning of delivering culturally appropriate care to someone who is culturally and linguistically different from the nurse, with specific religious needs.

Research vignette

Roberti SM, Fitzpatrick JJ. Assessing family satisfaction with care of critically ill patients: a pilot study. Critical Care Nursing 2010 30: 18–26.

Critique

This pilot study focuses on the satisfaction family members experience when their relative is in a critical care unit. The aim of the study is clearly stated as advancing the research in the area of overall satisfaction with care from a legitimate surrogate (the family) of critically ill patients. The justification for improving services highlights the different nature of health care in USA compared with other countries which have public sector funded care. The authors comment on the need to excel in a market that sees health care facilities compete for clients.

The authors give a very good overview of previous research in the area and provide a useful table that summarises pertinent studies. It would be helpful for completeness to have the names of all of the scales used in the research projects incorporated into the table. For example, the Family Satisfaction–Intensive Care Scale (FS-ICU) was used in four of the studies but it is not noted in the table or elsewhere in the paper whereas other scales are mentioned. This extra information helps the reader become familiar with validated scales for evaluating family satisfaction. The authors justify their choice for using the Critical Care Family Satisfaction Scale (CCFSS) which they consider is more inclusive. There is no definition given for who constitutes a family member. Some argue that a broad definition is desirable and that one’s family is made up with whomever they indicate is their family and this may not be based on blood or legal relationships and include those with a sustained relationship with the patient.11

A survey was distributed to a convenience sample of family members in two units: one a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) with 10 beds and the other a telementary/intermediate care unit with 14 beds in a community hospital. No description is given in regards to the acuity of the patients in the unit and one assumes that the patients in the SICU are more critically ill than in the other unit. One family member per patient was invited to complete the survey which reduces the potential for skewing the data with many family members from one patient. Families of dying patients were not invited to provide feedback. The authors give a humanitarian rationale of not adding to their dire situation, however, it could be argued that this group is an under-researched and important group in intensive care whose satisfaction with care is equally important to the staff.161 Sensitivity would be key to their inclusion.

The instrument is described well and the scoring is clearly outlined with an overall score out of a possible 100 and mean scores calculated for the five subscales. Thirty-one surveys were returned and analysis was conducted with results showing the participants from both units were satisfied with the care. It appears that the two units’ results are combined for further analysis which could be problematic if family members rate different items poorly in one unit as opposed to the other. If they were kept separate, no in-depth reporting occurs. Of particular interest for the units is the items which scored lowest on the survey as this provides direction for future interventions and improvements. Family members scored waiting time for results and X-rays lowest and the noise levels in the unit the second lowest. It may have been more meaningful to present Table 3 (which gives the mean scores for each item) with the items listed from the highest score down to the lowest score rather than as it is listed in order of how the items occur in the survey. That way the reader can readily see how items scored in relation to others. Once again, there may have been unit specific differences that are not apparent in the reported results with the exception of the worst scored item.

The support subscale had the highest level of satisfaction and the comfort subscale the lowest. The items within the comfort subscale pertain to the waiting room’s cleanliness, appearance and noise. Other authors162 acknowledge that providing a comfortable environment for families is important particularly as they can spend considerable time there during a relative’s critical illness as they wait to be allowed in to be with their relative.

The authors suggest a number of useful interventions aimed to improve families’ satisfaction and these include the following:

The authors clearly identify the limitations of a small convenience sample with families of patients of unknown acuity levels. The degree of illness has been found to be associated with low satisfaction levels in a Moroccan study164 and this patient characteristic may be worthy of inclusion in future studies. The authors highlight the benefit of such a study to provide baseline measurements against which future interventions can be measured.

Learning activities

1. Delivering patient- and family-centred nursing care can be assisted by a philosophy for nursing practice. To develop and articulate your own nursing philosophy, or way of doing things, complete the following activities:

2. Ascertain the personal and professional beliefs you hold as a critical care nurse about (a) health and illness, and (b) life, death and dying, by identifying situations when your personal and professional beliefs are in conflict. Once these beliefs have been identified, the critical care nurse may ask:

3. Using the information established in Learning Activity 2, identify:

This information can serve as a baseline for the development of strategies to improve practice.

References

1 Nussbaum GB. Spirituality in critical care: patient comfort and satisfaction. Crit Care Nurse. 2003;26(3):214–220.

2 Alsop-Shields L. The parent–staff interaction model of pediatric care. J Pediat Nurs. 2002;17(6):442–449.

3 Wilkins S, Pollock N, Rochon S, Law M. Implementing client-centred practice: why is it so difficult to do? Can J Occup Health. 2001;68(2):70–79.

4 McLaughlin C, Kaluzny A. Building client centered systems of care: choosing a process direction for the next century. Health Care Manage Rev. 2000;25(1):73–82.

5 Berry L, Seiders K, Wilder S. Innovations in access to care: a patient-centered approach. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(7):568–574.

6 Briggs L, Kirchhoff K, Hammes B, Song M, Colvin E. Patient-centered advance care planning in special patient populations: a pilot study. J Profess Nurs. 2004;20(1):47–58.

7 Franck L, Callery P. Re-thinking family-centred care across the continuum of children’s healthcare. Child: Care, Health Devel. 2004;30(3):265–277.

8 Gallant M, Beaulieu M, Carnevale F. Partnership: an analysis of the concept within the nurse-client relationship. J Adv Nurs. 2002;40(2):149–157.

9 Misak C. The critical care experience: a patient’s view. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(4):357–360.

10 Friedman M. Family nursing: research, theory and practice, 5th edn. Stamford: Appleton & Lange; 2003.

11 Wright LM, Leahey M. Nurses and families: a guide to family assessment and intervention, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: FA Davis & Company; 2000.

12 Hook ML. Partnering with patients – a concept ready for action. J Ad Nurs. 2006;56(2):133–143.

13 Olsen KD, Dysvik E, Hansen BS. The meaning of family members’ presence during intensive care stay: A qualitative study. Intens Crit Care Nurs. 2009;25:190–198.

14 Shields L, Pratt J, Flenady V, Davis L, Hunter J. Family-centred care for children in hospital. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003; 4: CD004811.

15 Harwood L, Ridley J, Boyle L. Implementation challenges of a renal nursing professional practice model. Nephrol Nurs J. 2003;30(5):503–515.

16 Espezel HJE, Canam CJ. Parent-nurse interactions: care of hospitalized children. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44(1):34–41.

17 Institute for Patient-and Family-Centred Care. What is patient- and family-centered care? [cited August 2010] Available from http://www.ipfcc.org/faq.html, 2005.

18 Webster P, Johnson B. Developing family-centered vision, mission, and philosophy of care statements. Bethesda, MD: Institute of Family Centered Care; 1999.

19 Cypress BS. The intensive care unit: experiences of patients, families, and their nurses. DCCN. 2010;29(2):94–101.

20 Frost M, Green A, Gance-Cleveland B, Kersten R, Irby C. Improving family-centered care through research. J Paed Nurs. 2010;25:144–147.

21 Galvin E, Boyer L, Schwartz P, Jones M, Mooney P, Warwick J. Challenging the precepts of family-centered care: testing a philosophy. Pediatr Nurs. 2000;26(6):625–632.

22 Shields L, Tanner A. Pilot study of a tool to investigate perceptions of family-centered care in different settings. Pediatr Nurs. 2004;30(3):189–197.

23 Bruce B, Letourneau N, Ritchie J, Larocque S, Dennis C, et al. A multisite study of health professionals’ perceptions and practices of family-centered care. J Family Nurs. 2002;8(4):408–429.

24 Mitchell ML, Chaboyer W, Burmeister L, Foster M. The positive effects of a nursing intervention on Family-Centered-Care in adult critical care. Am J Crit Care. 2009;18(6):543–552.

25 Mitchell ML, Chaboyer W. Family-centred care–a way to connect patients, families and nurses in critical care–a qualitative study using telephone interviews. Inten Crit Care Nurs. 2010;26:: 154–60.

26 Courtney M. Evidence for nursing practice. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.

27 Shields L. Questioning family-centered care. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:: 2629–38.

28 Knutsson SEM, Bergbom IL. Custodians’ viewpoints and experiences from their child’s visit to an ill or injured nearest being cared for at an adult intensive care unit. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16:362–371.

29 Duran CR, Oman KS, Abel JJ, Koziel VM, Szymanski D. Attitudes and beliefs about family presence: a survey of health care providers, patients’ family and patients. Am J Crit Care. 2007;16(3):270–279.

30 Johnson BH, Abraham MR, Shelton TL. Patient- and family-centered care: partnerships for quality and safety. N C Med J. 2009;70(2):125–130.

31 Nelson JE, Mulkerin CM, Adams LL, Pronovost PJ. Improving comfort and communication in the ICU: a practical new tool for palliative care performance measurement and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:264–271.

32 Ekwall A, Gerdtz M, Manias E. The influence of patient acuity on satisfaction with emergency care: perspectives of family, friends and carers. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(6):800–809.

33 Szalados JE. Legal issues in the practice of critical care medicine: a practical approach. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2 suppl):S44–S58.

34 Aiken LJ, Bibeau PD, Cilento BJ, Boutin R. A personal reflection: a case study in family-centered care at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. DCCN. 2010;29(1):13–19.

35 Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, et al. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of Intensive Care Unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:987–994.

36 Lee L, Lau Y. Immediate needs of adult family members of adult intensive care patients in Hong Kong. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12:490–500.

37 Leske JS. Protocols for practice: applying research at the bedside, interventions to decrease family anxiety. Crit Care Nurse. 2002;22(6):61–65.

38 Garrouste-Orgeas M, Willems V, Timsit JF, Diaw F, Brochon S, et al. Opinions of families, staff, and patients about family participation in care in intensive care units. J Crit Care. 2010;25(4):634–640.

39 Jones C, Skirrow P, Griffiths RD, Humphris G, Ingleby S, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder-related symptoms in relatives of patients following intensive care. Intens Care Med. 2004;30:456–460.

40 Paparrigopoulos T, Melissaki A, Efthymiou A, Tsekou H, Vadal C, et al. Short-term psychological impact on family members of intensive care unit patients. J Psychosomatic Res. 2006;61:719–722.

41 Takman A, Severinsson E. The needs of significant others within intensive care: the perspective of Swedish nurses and physicians. Intens Crit Care Nurs. 2004;20:22–31.

42 Molter N. Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study. Heart Lung. 1979;8(2):332–339.

43 Agard AS, Harderb I. Relatives’ experiences in intensive care – Finding a place in a world of uncertainty. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2007;23:170–177.

44 Alvarez GF, Kirby AS. The perspective of families of the critically ill patient: their needs. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:614–618.

45 Chien WT, Chiu YL, Lam LW, Ip WY. Effects of a needs-based education programme for family carers with a relative in an intensive care unit: A quasi-experimental study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43:39–50.

46 Davidson JE, Daly BJ, Agan D, Brady NR, Higgins PA. Facilitated sensemaking: a feasibility study for the provision of a family support program in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2010;33(2):177–189.

47 Hickman RL, Douglas SL. Impact of chronic critical Illness on the psychological outcomes of family members. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2010;21(1):80–91.

48 Kentish-Barnes N, Lemiale V, Chaize M, Pochard F, Azoulay E. Assessing burden in families of critical care patients. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10 Suppl):S448–S456.

49 Mitchell ML, Courtney M, Coyer F. Understanding uncertainty and minimizing families’ anxiety at the time of transfer from intensive care. Nurs Health Sci. 2003;5(3):207–217.

50 Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Mokhtari M, et al. Meeting the needs of intensive care unit patient families. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:135–139.

51 Nelson DP, Polst G. An interdisciplinary team approach to evidence-based improvement in family-centered care. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008;31(2):110–118.

52 Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:469–478.

53 Soltner C, Lassalle V, Galienne-Bouygues S, Pottecher J, Floccard B, et al. Written information that relatives of adult intensive care unit patients would like to receive – A comparison to published recommendations and opinion of staff members. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(7):2197–2202.

54 Mitchell ML, Courtney M. Improving ICU transfer, an intervention study: the family members’ perspective. Aust Crit Care. 2005;18(2):61–69.

55 Mitchell ML, Courtney M. An intervention study to improve the transfer of ICU patients to the ward: evaluation by ICU nurses. Aust Crit Care. 2005;18(3):123–128.

56 Kirchhoff KT, Faas AI. Family support at end of life. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007;18(4):426–435.

57 Gonzalez C, Carroll D, Elliott J, Fitzgerald P, Vallent H. Visiting preferences of patients in the Intensive Care Medical Unit. Am J Crit Care. 2004;3(3):194–197.

58 Gavaghan S, Carroll D. Families of critically ill patients and the effect of nursing interventions. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2002;21(2):64–71.

59 Roland P, Russell J, Richards KC, Sullivan SC. Visitation in critical care: processes and outcomes of a performance improvement. J Nurs Care Qual. 2001;15(2):18–26.

60 Molter NC. Family are not visitors in the critical care unit. Dimen Crit Care Nurs. 1994;13(1):2–3.

61 Carnevale F. Avoiding family induced stress: effective strategies for working with families. Melbourne: 29th Australian and New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting on Intensive Care; 2004. 7–10 Oct

62 Mitchell ML. [Editorial] Family-centred care – are we ready for it? An Australian perspective. Nurs Crit Care. 2005;10(2):54–55.

63 Garrouste-Orgeas M, Philippart F, Timsit JF, Diaw F, Willems V, et al. Perceptions of a 24-hour visiting policy in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(1):30–35.

64 Fumagalli S, Boncinelli L, Lo Nostro A, et al. Reduced cardiocirculatory complications with unrestrictive visiting policy in an intensive care unit: Results from a pilot, randomized trial. Circulation. 2006;113:946–952.

65 Lee MD, Friedenberg AS, Mukpo DH, Conray K, Palmisciano A, Levy MM. Visiting hours policies in New England intensive care units: strategies for improvement. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):497–501.

66 Whitcomb JA, Roy D, Blackman VS. Evidence-based practice in a military intensive care unit family visitation. Nurs Res. 2010;59(1 Suppl):S32–S39.

67 Van Horn ER, Kautz D. Promotion of family integrity in the acute care setting. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2007;26(3):101–107.

68 Maxwell KE, Stuenkel D, Saylor C. Needs of family members of critically ill patients: a comparison of nurse and family perceptions. Heart Lung. 2007;36(5):367–376.

69 Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, Tieszen M, Kon AA, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004–2005. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):605–622.

70 Williams CMA. The identification of family members’ contribution to patients’ care in the intensive care unit: a naturalistic inquiry. Nurs Crit Care. 2005;10(1):6–14.

71 Davidson JE. Meeting the needs of patients’ families and helping families adapt to critical illness. Crit Care Nurs. 2009;29(3):28–34.

72 Arockiasamy V, Holsti L, Albersheim S. Fathers’ experiences in the neonatal intensive care unit: a search for control. Pediatr. 2008;121(2):215–222.

73 Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Arich C, Brivet F, et al. Family participation in care to the critically ill: opinions of families and staff. Intens Care Med. 2003;29:1498–1504.

74 Patak L, Gawlinski A, Fung NI, Doering L, Berg J, Henneman EA. Communication boards in critical care: patients’ views. Appl Nurs Res. 2006;19:182–190.

75 Hemsley B, Sigafoos J, Balandin S, Forbes R, Taylor C, et al. Nursing the patient with severe communication impairment. J Adv Nurs. 2001;35(6):827–835.

76 Casbolt S. Communication with the ventilated patient: a literature review. Nurs Crit Care. 2002;7(4):198–202.

77 Hupcey JE, Zimmerman HE. The need to know: experiences of critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 2000;9(3):192–198.

78 Happ M, Tuite P, Dobbin K, DiVirgilio-Thomas D, Kitutu J. Communication ability, method, and content among nonspeaking nonsurviving patients treated with mechanical ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit. Am J Crit Care. 2004;13(3):210–218.

79 Travaline JM. Communication in the ICU: an essential component of patient care. J Crit Illness. 2002;17(11):451–456.

80 Alasad J, Ahmad M. Communication with critically ill patients. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50(4):356–362.

81 Lawrence M. The unconscious experience. Am J Crit Care. 1995;4:227–232.

82 Green A. An explanatory study of patients’ memory recall of their stay in an adult intensive therapy unit. Intens Crit Care Nurs. 1996;12:131–137.

83 Benner P, Shobe T. Seeing the person beyond the disease. Am J Crit Care. 2004;13(1):75–78.

84 Hupcey JE. Feeling safe: the psychosocial needs of ICU patients. J Nurs Scholar. 2000;32(4):361–367.

85 Happ MB, Roesch TK, Garrett K. Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: a feasibility study. Heart Lung. 2004;33:92–101.

86 Narayanasamy A, Clissett P, Parumal L, Thompson D, Annasamy S, Edge R. Response to the spiritual needs of older people. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(1):6–16.

87 Wepa D. Cultural safety in Aotearoa. Auckland, NZ: Pearson Education; 2004.

88 Farrell M. Smeltzer & Bare’s textbook of medical–surgical nursing. Sydney: Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

89 Leninger MM. Cultural care diversity and universality: a theory of nursing. New York: National League for Nursing Press; 2001.

90 Giger JN, Davidhizar RE. Transcultural nursing: assessment and intervention, 3rd edn. St Louis: Mosby; 1999.

91 Charon JM. Symbolic interactionism: an introduction, an interpretation, an integration, 6th edn. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.

92 Miles R. Racism. London: Routledge; 1989.

93 Ryan A, Carryer J, Patterson L. Healthy concerns: sociology for New Zealand nursing and midwifery students. Auckland, NZ: Pearson Education; 2003.

94 Wilson D. The nurse’s role in improving indigenous health. Contemp Nurse. 2003;15(3):232–240.

95 Mosley S, ed.. Ki te whaiao: an introduction to Māori culture and society. . Pearson Education: Auckland, NZ, 2004:61–72.

96 Jackson D, Brady W, Stein I. Toward (re)conciliation: (re)constructing relationships between indigenous health workers and nurses. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29(1):97–103.

97 Coyle J. Understanding dissatisfied users: developing a framework for comprehending criticisms of health care work. J Adv Nurs. 1999;30(3):723–731.

98 Ramsden I. Kawa Whakaruruhau: cultural safety in nursing education. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Health; 1990.

99 Ramsden IM. Cultural safety and nursing education in Aotearoa and Te Pounamu. Unpublished doctoral thesis, 2002: Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. [Cited January 2011]. Available from http://culturalsafety.massey.ac.nz/thesis.htm

100 Wood PJ, Schwass M. Cultural safety: a framework for changing attitudes. Nurs Prax NZ. 1993;8(1):4–15.

101 Rosenjack Burchum JL. Cultural competence: an evolutionary perspective. Nurs Forum. 2002;37(4):5–15.

102 Geron SM. Cultural competency: How is it measured? Does it make a difference? Generations. 2002;26(3):39–45.

103 Wilson D. The significance of culturally appropriate health service for indigenous Māori women. Contemp Nurs. 2008;28:173–188.

104 Durie M. Cultural competence and medical practice in New Zealand. Paper presented to the Australian and New Zealand Boards and Council Conference, Wellington, NZ; 2001.

105 Wilson D, Roberts M. Māori health initiatives. In: Wepa D, ed. Cultural safety in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Auckland, NZ: Pearson Education, 2004.

106 Chambers-Evans J, Stelling J, Godin M. Learning to listen: serendipitous outcomes of a research training experience. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29(1):79–87.

107 Funnell MM. Patient empowerment. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2004;27(2):201–204.

108 Conning AM, Rowland LA. Staff attitudes and the provision of individualised care: What determines what we do for people with long-term psychiatric disabilities? J Ment Health. 1992;1(1):71–80.

109 Proctor S. Whose evidence? Agenda setting in multi-professional research: observations from a case study. Health, Risk Soc. 2002;4(1):45–99.

110 Waters KR, Easton N. Individualized care: is it possible to plan and carry out? J Adv Nurs. 1999;29(1):79–87.

111 Christensen JC. Nursing partnership: a model for nursing practice – Hauora takirua: he tauira mo nga kaupapa hauora. Wellington, NZ: Daphne Brasell Associates Press; 1995.

112 Bredemeyer S, Reid S, Poverinom J, Wacadlo C. Implementation and evaluation of an individualized developmental care program in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Spec Ped Nurs. 2008;13:281–291.

113 Suhonen R, Valimaki M, Leino-Kilpi A. Individualized care, quality of life and satisfaction with nursing care. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50:283–292.

114 Karkkainen O, Bondas T, Eriksson K. Documentation of individualized patient care: A qualitative metasynthesis. Nurs Ethics. 2005;12:123–132.

115 Campinha-Bacote J. The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services. www.transculturalcare.net/Cultural_Competence_Model, 2002. [cited December 2010]. Available from

116 Ka’ai T, Higgins R. Te ao Māori: Māori worldview. In: Ka’ai TM, Moorfield JC, Reilly MPJ, Mosley S. Ki te whaiao: an introduction to Māori culture and society. Auckland: Pearson Education; 2004:13–25.

117 Wilson DL. The Treaty of Waitangi, nurses and their practice. NZ Nurs Rev. 2002;3(4):18.

118 Reilly MPJ. Whanaungatanga – kinship. In: Ka’ai TM, Moorfield JC, Reilly MPJ, Mosley S. Ki te whaiao: an introduction to Māori culture and society. Auckland: Pearson Education; 2004:61–72.

119 Royal Commission on Social Policy. Volume 2, Part Two: Future directions, associated papers. Wellington, NZ: Royal Commission on Social Policy; 1988. April

120 King A, Turia T. He Korowai Oranga: Māori health strategy. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Health; 2002.

121 Reilly MPJ. Te timatanga mai o nga atua. In: Ka’ai TM, Moorfield JC, Reilly MPJ, Mosley S. Ki te whaiao: an introduction to Māori culture and society. Auckland: Pearson Education; 2004:1–12.

122 Stenhouse J, Paterson L. Nga poropiti me nga Hatu – prophets and the churches. In: Ka’ai TM, Moorfield JC, Reilly MPJ, Mosley S. Ki te whaiao: an introduction to Māori culture and society. Auckland, NZ: Pearson Education; 2004:163–170.

123 Durie M. Whaiora: Māori health development, 2nd edn. Auckland, NZ: Oxford University Press; 1998.

124 Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4713.0 Population characteristics, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 2006. Indigenous population. [Cited January 2011]. Available from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/82742A1B597A338CCA257718002A6FCE?

125 Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4704.0 The Health and Welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, Oct 2010. [Cited February 2011]. Available from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/lookup/4704.0Chapter700Oct+2010

126 Eckerman A, Dowd T, Chong E, Nixon L, Gray R, Johnson S. Binan Goonj: bridging cultures in Aboriginal health, 2nd edn. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone; 2006.

127 National Aboriginal Health Strategy Working Party. A national Aboriginal health strategy. Canberra: Department of Aboriginal Affairs; 1989.

128 Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing & Office for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health. ‘Gettin em n keeping em.’ Report of the Indigenous Nursing Education Working Group; 2002.

129 Latour JM, Fullbrook P, Albarron JW. EfCCNa survey: European intensive care nurses’ attitudes and beliefs towards end-of-life care. Nurs Crit Care. 2009;14:110–121.

130 Halligan P. Caring for patients of Islamic denomination: Critical care nurses’ experiences in Saudi Arabia. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15:1565–1573.

131 Kongsuwan H. Promoting peaceful death in the intensive care unit in Thailand. Int Nurs Rev. 2009;56:106–112.

132 Blockley C. Meeting patients’ religious needs. Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand. 2001/2002;7(11):15–17.

133 Bagshaw SM, Webb SAR, Delany A, et al. Very old patients admitted to intensive care in Australia and New Zealand: a multi centre cohort analysis. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R45.

134 Warren N. Critical care family members’ satisfaction with bereavement experiences. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2002;25(2):54–60.

135 Puri VK. Death in the ICU: feelings of those left behind. Chest. 2003;124(1):11–13.

136 Gries CJ, Curtis JR, Wall RJ, Engelberg RA. Family member satisfaction with end-of-life decision making in the ICU. Chest. 2008;133:704–712.

137 Gaeta S, Price KJ. End-of-life issues in critically ill, cancer patients. Crit Care Clin. 2010;26:219–227.

138 Rocker GM, Heyland DK, Cook DJ, Dodek PM, Kutsogiannis DJ. Most critically ill patients are perceived to die in comfort during withdrawal of life support: a Canadian multicentre study. Can J Anesth. 2004;51(6):623–630.

139 Kuschner WG, David A, Gruenewald DA, Clum N, Beal A, Ezeji-Okoye SC. Implementation of ICU palliative care guidelines and procedures: a quality improvement initiative following an investigation of alleged euthanasia. Chest. 2009;135:26–32.

140 Mularski RA, Puntillo K, Varkey B, Erstad BL, Grap MJ, et al. Pain management within the palliative and end-of-life care experience in the ICU. Chest. 2009;135:1360–1369.

141 Puntillo KA, Benner P, Drought T, Drew B, Stotts N, et al. End-of-life issues in intensive care units: a national random survey of nurses’ knowledge and beliefs. Am J Crit Care. 2001;10(4):216–229.

142 O’Mahony S, McHugh M, Zallman L, Selwyn P. Ventilator withdrawal: procedures and outcomes. Report of a collaboration between a critical care division and a palliative care service. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003;26(4):954–961.

143 Enes SPD. An exploration of dignity in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2003;17:263–269.

144 Schaefer KG, Block SD. Physician communication with families in the ICU: evidence-based strategies for improvement. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15:569–577.

145 Cook D, Rocker DM, Heyland D. Dying in the ICU: strategies that may improve end-of-life care. Can J Anesth. 2004;51(3):266–272.

146 Johnson N, Cook D, Giacomini M, Willms D. Towards a ‘good’ death: end-of-life narratives constructed in an intensive care unit. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2000;24:275–295.

147 Mosenthal AC, Murphy PA, Barker LK, Lavery R, Retano A, Livingston DH. Changing the culture around end-of-life care in the trauma intensive care unit. J Trauma. 2008;64(6):1587–1593.

148 Clarke EB, Curtis R, Luce JM, Levy M, Danis M, et al. Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(9):2255–2262.

149 Krueger G. Meaning-making in the aftermath of sudden infant death syndrome. Nurs Inq. 2006;13(3):163–171.

150 Campbell M, Thill M. Bereavement follow up to families after death in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(4):1252–1253.

151 Nelson JE, Angus DC, Weissfeld LA, Puntillo KA, Danis M, et al. End-of-life care for the critically ill: A national intensive care unit survey. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(10):2547–2553.

152 Fauri D, Ettner B, Kovacs P. Bereavement services in acute care settings. Death Stud. 2000;24:51–64.

153 Golden A-MJ, Dalgleish T. Is prolonged grief distinct from bereavement-related posttraumatic stress? Psychiatry Res. 2010;178:336–341.

154 Casarett D, Kutner J, Abrahm J. Life after death: a practical approach to grief and bereavement. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(3):208–215.

155 Fauri D, Oliver R, Sturtevant J, Scheetz J, Fallat M. Beneficial effects of a hospital bereavement intervention program after traumatic childhood death. J Trauma. 2001;50(3):440–448.

156 Williams R, Harris S, Randall L, Nichols R, Brown S. A bereavement after-care service for intensive care relatives and staff: the story so far. Nurs Crit Care. 2003;8(3):109–115.

157 Valks K, Mitchell ML, Inglis-Simmons C, Limpus A. Dealing with death: an audit of family bereavement programs in Australian intensive care units. Aust Crit Care. 2005;18(3):257–268.

158 Brosche TA. Death, dying, and the ICU nurse. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2003;22(4):173–179.

159 Main J. Management of relatives of patients who are dying. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11:794–801.

160 Rogers S, Babgi A, Gomez C. Educational Interventions in End-of-Life Care: Part I. Adv Neonatal Care. 2008;8(1):56–65.

161 Rees E, Hardy J. Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent. BMJ. 2003;327:198–202.

162 Kutash M, Northrop L. Family members’ experiences of the intensive care unit waiting room. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60(4):384–388.

163 Roberti SM, Fitzpatrick JJ. Assessing family satisfaction with care of critically ill patients: a pilot study. Crit Care Nurs. 2010;30(6):18–26.

164 Damghi N, Khoudri I, Oualili L, Abidi K, Madani N, et al. Measuring the satisfaction of intensive care unit patient families in Morocco: A regression tree analysis. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(7):2084–2091.

165 Silvestri LA. Saunders comprehensive review for the NCLEX-RN(R) examination, 3rd edn. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.