Faecal incontinence

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1315 times

Chapter 19 FAECAL INCONTINENCE

PREVALENCE

The reported prevalence rates of faecal incontinence in the world vary from 0.7%–11%, depending on the definition and population group studied. This is demonstrated in Table 19.1.

TABLE 19.1 International prevalence rates of faecal incontinence

Country Population Prevalence
Holland Women >60 y 4.2% to 16.9% with rising age
France All >45 y 11%, 6% to faeces, 60% women
UK Community service 1.9%
USA Market mailing 7% soiling, 0.7% to faeces
USA Wisconsin households 2.2%, 63% women
USA Wisconsin nursing homes 47%
New Zealand >65 y 3.1%
Australia Household survey 6.8% men
10.9% women >15 y
Australia Postal survey Liquid incontinence 9%
Random selection from electoral roll (subjects ≥18 y) Solid incontinence 2%

Based on Continence Foundation of Australia. Incontinence: some key statistics and quotes clarified. Online.

Available: www.contfound.org.au/pdf/Keystatsquotsmay03.pdf.

Incontinence is such an embarrassing condition that few people speak of it. As a result, its true prevalence is believed to be higher than that reported.

AETIOLOGY

Table 19.2 lists the possible causes of faecal incontinence. Looser stool consistency is an important precipitating factor in those predisposed to faecal incontenance by anorectal abnormalities.

TABLE 19.2 Classification of the aetiology of faecal incontinence

Altered stool consistency—diarrhoeal states

Inadequate reservoir capacity or compliance

Inadequate rectal sensation

Abnormal sphincter mechanism or pelvic floor

Previous operations

HISTORY

A detailed history is absolutely necessary in the assessment of any pathological condition, paying particular attention to the characteristic cause and extent of the incontinence. It is important to determine the nature of incontinence—whether it is incontinence to solid, liquid or flatus—and to determine the frequency of the incontinence and the necessity to wear a protective pad. Other associated symptoms such as urgency need to be determined as well as social limitation as a result of the incontinence.

Direct questioning is necessary on the history of vaginal delivery and complications. The patient should also be asked about associated conditions such as urinary incontinence, rectal prolapse, diabetes mellitus, medications, radiation treatment or any congenital abnormalities. It is also important to determine whether the patient has had a previous anorectal operation, low colon anastomosis or trauma to the anorectal area.

There are many continence scoring systems available in the literature. Most of them are useful for research purposes but are not practical for day-to-day use. The St Mark’s scoring system is listed in Table 19.3. A clue to the severity of incontinence is determining the frequency of the incontinence, the necessity to wear a protective pad and the effect on social function.

TABLE 19.3 St Mark’s continence scoring system

Symptom severity Score
Incontinence to solid stool
Never 0
Less than once per month 1
Less than once per week 2
Most days 3
Incontinence to liquid stool
Never 0
Less than once per month 1
Less than once per week 2
Most days 3
Incontinence to flatus
Never 0
Less than once per month 1
Less than once per week 2
Most days 3
Ability to withhold defecation more than 15 min
Yes 0
No 1

Difficulty cleaning after evacuation No 0 Yes 1 Soiling None 0 Minor 1 Major 2

0 = fully continent; 13 = regularly completely incontinent to all rectal contents.

INVESTIGATIONS

TREATMENT

Treatment of incontinence involves non-operative and operative procedures (see Figure 19.1).

Non-operative procedures

Operative procedures

It is important to bear in mind that the majority of patients with faecal incontinence can be treated with conservative management, i.e. diet change, medication, biofeedback training and continence advice. Only a minority of patients require operative intervention.