Extracranial Large Artery Atherothrombosis

Published on 12/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 12/04/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1931 times

Chapter 5 Extracranial Large Artery Atherothrombosis

Extracranial atherothrombotic disease is an important cause of stroke, and the management of asymptomatic occlusive disease poses additional challenges and opportunities for stroke prevention. Depending on the population studied, approximately 20% of strokes are attributed to large vessel extracranial disease.1 The prevalence of asymptomatic carotid stenosis greater than 50% stenosis is approximately 3% in the general population.24 There is a higher prevalence of extracranial atherosclerotic disease in whites compared with African Americans and other ethnic groups.5,6

The workup of stroke patients requires a careful examination of the extravascular tree to determine vessel pathology and stroke etiology. This investigation must include the carotid bifurcation and vertebral artery origin, which are sites characteristically affected by atherosclerosis. Other forms of extracranial vasculopathy such as arterial dissections typically spare these regions but tend to occur in the distal cervical segments of the carotid and vertebral arteries. Inflammatory extracranial vasculopathies are rare; the most common, Takayasu arteritis, typically affects the origins of the large extracranial vessels as they exit the aortic arch. Understanding how various arterial segments are preferentially affected by different vascular pathologies is often helpful in making an accurate diagnosis of stroke etiology.

Diagnostic imaging of the extracranial cerebrovasculature includes ultrasonography, magnetic resonance (MR), computed tomography (CT), and catheter cerebral angiography. In patients with stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIA), it is essential to determine the degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis because this is the most important predictor of stroke recurrence. Symptomatic patients with 50% to 69% and greater than 70% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with stenosis exceeding 60% must be reliably identified because arterial revascularization is typically considered at these cutoff points.

ULTRASONOGRAPHY

Ultrasound remains a powerful screening and diagnostic tool in the examination of extracranial carotid and vertebral vessels. It has excellent diagnostic accuracy for carotid stenosis and correlation with the gold standard cerebral catheter angiography. The advantages of ultrasonography include its ease of performance and direct visualization of plaque composition and contour.

Determining the exact degree of stenosis remains the single most important goal of extracranial ultrasonography. However, plaque composition is an additional determinant of future stroke risk, particularly in the setting of symptomatic stenosis. Carotid plaques that are hypoechoic (i.e., have a dark intraplaque area), or ulcerated are of particular concern.711 These hypoechoic areas are likely to represent intraplaque hemorrhage, and these plaques should be considered unstable, thus having an increased thromboembolic potential. The presence of calcifications, in contrast, imparts relative plaque stability, and such plaques are less likely to be symptomatic12 (Figure 5-1).

Ultrasonography is technician-dependent and requires considerable skill and expertise. It is typically used as an initial screening tool, and thereby sensitivity is optimized at the expense of specificity-that is, it will tend to overestimate the degree of stenosis resulting in some false-positive results. Therefore a confirmatory test is necessary to improve the overall accuracy of the diagnostic approach.13 Ultrasound is less reliable in identifying carotid stenosis in moderate ranges (between 50% and 69%)14,15 and carotid occlusion.13

Because ultrasonography uses an increase in flow velocities as the main diagnostic criterion, the findings of ultrasonography in the setting of abnormal collateral flow patterns must be carefully interpreted. This situation often arises during insonation of a moderately stenotic plaque in patients with contralateral occlusion or high-grade stenosis. In these cases, ultrasound may overestimate the degree of stenosis of the moderately stenotic plaque,16,17 and the findings on ultrasonography must be cautiously reviewed and confirmed with other imaging modalities.

It is also important to realize that ultrasonography only visualizes the proximal portion of the carotid artery, and pathology involving the distal cervical segment may be unrecognized.

MR AND CT ANGIOGRAPHY

In general clinical practice, the findings on ultrasonography are often confirmed with an alternate imaging technique. MR and CT angiography have essentially replaced catheter angiography as the confirmatory test. The advantages MR and CT angiography are that they are noninvasive and readily available. The sensitivity and specificity for both techniques exceeds 80% to 90%.13,15,18,19 For the majority of patients, this approach (i.e., ultrasonography and CT/MR angiography combined) will correctly identify the true degree of stenosis. However, it continues to be controversial if noninvasive techniques are reliable enough to make decisions about surgical intervention, particularly if the degree of stenosis is in the moderate (50%–69%) range.15

CT angiography has recently experienced a revival with the advent of multislice detectors and development of sophisticated postimaging software. Advantages of CT over MR angiography lie in its acquisition speed. Even though few data are available with these newer techniques, they are likely to improve further the diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography.19

MR angiography is widely used at present but has some inherent limitations. There is a tendency for overestimation of the degree of stenosis because of sampling error. Therefore MR angiography may be more valuable as a screening tool rather than to confirm that stenosis is actually present.20 The specificity and sensitivity can be improved with gadolinium administration.20,21

Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive imaging is generally improved if results of ultrasonography and MR or CT angiography are concordant.13

CATHETER CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY

Catheter cerebral angiography remains the gold standard in determining the degree of stenosis and identifying surgical candidates. However, even in recent clinical trials, there has been a trend in favor of noninvasive testing, particularly in asymptomatic patients, given the risks of catheter angiography.22 The risk of stroke may be as high as 1.2% in asymptomatic patients; however, other reports have shown a reduced risk of serious complications in general practice.23,24

Less well recognized are subclinical infarcts detected by diffusion-weighted MR imaging after diagnostic cerebral angiography. Such lesions are present in up to 20% of patients and are the result of silent microembolism,25 but might produce subtle neuropsychiatric manifestations that go undetected.

CLINICAL FEATURES OF CAROTID ATHEROTHROMBOSIS

This case illustrates the clinical hallmarks of large arterial atherothrombosis:

MECHANISMS OF INFARCTION

In extracranial large vessel disease the brain is affected by important pathophysiological events taking place at significant distances. These processes include thromboembolism and the downstream effects of decreased perfusion with increasing degrees of stenosis. These two mechanisms are embolic and hemodynamic.

Atherothrombotic Embolism

Artery-to-artery embolism is the most common mechanism of symptoms in large-artery disease. Emboli generated from an unstable carotid plaque may lead to a wide spectrum of symptoms from benign to disabling. These include asymptomatic retinal emboli, transient monocular blindness, retinal arterial infarction, hemispheric TIA, and small or large territorial strokes. Emboli are likely to consist of varying combinations of platelets, cholesterol particles and fibrin.

Even though the degree of carotid stenosis remains the single most important factor in predicting stroke risk in symptomatic patients, certain situations warrant a more careful assessment of carotid disease, as illustrated in the next case vignette.