Erythema Multiforme, Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Published on 08/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Opthalmology

Last modified 08/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 7872 times

30

Erythema Multiforme, Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Introduction

Erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are considered as a spectrum of epidermal bullous diseases involving the skin and mucous membranes, usually triggered by drugs or infection. Although rare diseases, they are important since they cause high mortality and morbidity, with ocular involvement often being the most serious long-term sequela. Initial management involves early recognition, prompt hospitalization, and immediate cessation of the offending agent. During the acute self-limited course of the illness, management is primarily supportive in providing fluid management and prevention of sepsis. During the acute stage, it is important to manage the ocular surface inflammation aggressively with supportive treatment, so as to minimize the development of cicatricial changes that lead to chronic ocular surface disease.

History

In 1866, the Austrian dermatologist Ferdinand von Hebra first described erythema multiforme as a self-limited cutaneous disease characterized by multiform skin lesions.1 In association with the erythematous skin lesions, his findings included a severe stomatitis and purulent conjunctivitis. In 1922, two American pediatricians, Stevens and Johnson, described two boys with a more severe mucocutaneous disease with ophthalmologic manifestations, naming the disease eruptive fever with stomatitis and ophthalmia.2 This nomenclature was not adopted. However, since that time, erythema multiforme major has been most commonly referred to as Stevens–Johnson syndrome. In 1950, Thomas suggested the division of erythema multiforme into two forms: minor (von Hebra) and major (SJS).3 In 1956, Lyell introduced the term toxic epidermal necrolysis, a condition characterized by more extensive skin loss in conjunction with mucous membrane involvement.4

Classification

There was confusion in the nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for the erythema multiforme spectrum of diseases until an international classification was adopted in 1993.5 Traditionally, erythema multiforme was divided into minor and major forms, with the minor form only involving skin, with no or minimal mucous membrane involvement and not involving the eye. Table 30.1 outlines the diagnostic criteria for bullous skin diseases.6 Although the terms EM major and SJS are often used interchangeably, international collaborators have now differentiated them by their etiology and pattern of cutaneous lesions.7 The major etiologic factor for EM major (or bullous EM) is herpes simplex virus (HSV), compared to drug-induced SJS. An international consensus collaboration further classified the overlap between SJS and TEN. They defined five categories based on the pattern of skin lesions and extent of epidermal detachment as shown in Table 30.2.5

Table 30.2

Proposed Classification of Cases in the Spectrum of Severe Bullous EM

image

EM, erythema multiforme; SJS, Stevens–Johnson syndrome; TEN, toxic epidermal necrolysis.

(Adapted from Bastuji-Garin. Clinical classification of cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, and erythema multiforme. Arch Dermatol 1993;129:92–6.)

Incidence

Although EM/SJS/TEN are rare conditions, they are important because they cause high mortality and morbidity. Chan (USA) reported an overall incidence of these diseases at 4.2 per million person-years (TEN 0.5 per million person-years),6 and Rzany (Germany) reported an overall incidence of 1.89 per million person-years.8 Schöpf (Germany) reported an incidence of SJS at 1.1 per million person-years and incidence of TEN at 0.93 per million person-years.9 Roujeau (France) reported an incidence of TEN at 1.2 to 1.3 per million person-years.10 The reported mortality rate is 1% for EM, 1% to 7% for SJS, and 30% to 45% for TEN.911 Both the incidence and the mortality appear to be higher in immunocompromised patients with these risks correlated with weaker immune function.12 EM is more common in males, whereas TEN is more common in women, with a ratio ranging from 1.5 : 1 to 2.0 : 1.911 Although these conditions can occur at any age, EM and SJS tends to occur in younger patients in their second to third decades, whereas TEN occurs in older patients in their fifth to seventh decades.911

Etiology

Drugs and infections are the most common inciting causes of disease, as shown in Table 30.3. Drug-related reactions typically begin within 3 weeks of initiation of therapy. In cases of re-exposure to the drug, the reaction may begin within hours of restarting the therapy.6 TEN is usually drug-related. Drugs are an important cause of SJS, but infections, or a combination of infections and drugs has also been implicated. Infections, especially viral, are the most common cause of EM. In large epidemiology studies, drugs accounted for 89% to 95.5% of cases of TEN,9,10 54% to 64% of cases of SJS,9,11 and 18% for EM major.11 In the international prospective SCAR (severe cutaneous adverse reactions) study, recent or recurrent herpes was the principal risk factor for EM major (etiologic fractions of 29% and 17%, respectively) and had a role in SJS (etiologic fractions of 6% and 10%) but not in overlap cases or TEN.11 Mycoplasma pneumoniae has also been associated with EM Major in several studies.11,13

Table 30.3

Etiologies of Stevens–Johnson Syndrome

Etiologic agent Most frequently described
Drugs Sulfas, NSAIDs, antiepileptics, barbiturates, allopurinol, tetracyclines, antiparasitics
Viral HIV, herpes simplex, Epstein–Barr, influenza, coxsackie, lymphogranuloma venereum, variola
Bacterial Mycoplasma pneumonia, typhoid, tularemia, diphtheria, group A streptococci
Fungal Dermatophytosis, histoplasmosis, coccidiomycosis
Protozoal Trichomoniasis, plasmodium

NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.

(Adapted from Hazin R, Ibrahimi OA, Hazin MI, Kimyai-asadi A. Stevens–Johnson syndrome: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Ann Med 2008;40:129–38.)

In the SCAR study, the use of antibacterial sulfonamides, anticonvulsants, oxicam nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), allopurinol, chlormezanone, and corticosteroids were associated with large increases in the risk of SJS or TEN.14 However, it is important to note that these reactions are rare, since for each of these drugs the excess risk did not exceed five cases per million users per week. Among drugs usually used for months or years, the increased risk was confined largely to the first 2 months of treatment. Table 30.4 lists drugs that have been associated with these diseases.

Table 30.4

Drugs Associated with EM/SJS/TEN

image

(Adapted from Palmon et al. Cornea. 3rd ed. Elsevier 2011. p. 604.)

Pathogenesis

The exact pathophysiologic mechanism of EM/SJS/TEN remains unknown. Prevailing evidence indicates an immune-mediated response, in particular those mediated by memory cytotoxic T cells, to drugs and infections. Histologically, keratinocyte death occurs from extensive apoptosis.15 The proposed initiating mechanism involves the interaction between Fas and Fas ligand (FasL), which is either membrane bound on keratinocytes or soluble.16 Activation of the Fas signaling cascade leads to widespread keratinocyte apoptosis and subsequent epithelial necrosis. It has been suggested that soluble FasL is secreted by peripheral blood mononuclear cells and is elevated in EM and TEN patients.17 Other studies have also linked perforin, a pore-making monomeric granule released from natural killer T lymphocytes, which is thought to initiate the keratinolysis seen early in the development of SJS.18 Granulysin has also been implicated as a key mediator for disseminated keratinocyte death in SJS/TEN. Granulysin levels are much higher in patients with SJS/TEN, compared to healthy controls, and also correlate with clinical severity.19

Genetic factors may also play a role in the development of erythema multiforme disorders. Slow acetylators and those taking medications, such as azoles, protease inhibitors, serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors, and quinolones are at increased risk of developing SJS. The reduced rate of acetylation causes the accumulation of reactive metabolites that induce cell-mediated cytotoxic reactions against the epidermis, resulting in keratinocyte apoptosis.12

In studies in Western populations,14,20 antibiotics, particularly sulfonamides, are the most common drug trigger. In the largest Asian study by Chang et al.,13 anticonvulsants, particularly carbamazepine, and allopurinol were the most common drug triggers. A study by Chung et al.21 found a strong association in Han Chinese between the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B*1502 and SJS induced by carbamazepine. Another study showed that HLA-B*5801 is highly associated with allopurinol-induced SJS/TEN.22 These associations suggest the importance of pharmacogenetic mechanisms on the risk of developing SJS/TEN.

Clinical Findings

Systemic Features

Mucous membrane involvement occurs in more than 90% of affected patients, and the absence of such lesions should cast doubt on the diagnosis. There is no correlation between the extent and severity of mucous membrane erosions and the extent of epidermal detachment.5,8 Painful erosions of the mucous membrane may affect the lip, oral cavity, conjunctiva, nasal cavity, urethra, vagina, gastrointestinal tract, and respiratory tract. Mucous membrane ulceration can result in both short-term dysfunction and morbidity, and lead to long-term complications, due to fibrosis and stricture formation. In the study by Chang et al.13 the most common sites of mucosal involvement were the mouth (72%), eye(s) (60%), genitalia (37%), and anus (8%). Mucous membrane erosions sometimes persist for months after the reparation of the epidermis and may leave atrophic scars.

EM/SJS/TEN skin lesions have characteristic patterns and are described in Table 30.2 and shown in Figure 30.1.11 The rash of EM is predominantly on the extremities, including the dorsal aspect of the hands and feet, and on the extensor surface of the forearms, legs, palms and soles.11 Typical target lesions are < 3 cm in diameter, with a regular round shape, well-defined border, and at least three different zones, i.e. two concentric rings around a central disc (Fig. 30.1A). Raised atypical targets are round, edematous, palpable lesions, reminiscent of EM but with only two zones and/or a poorly defined border.

The rash in SJS consists of flat atypical target lesions and erythematous macules that then develop central necrosis to form vesicles, bullae, and areas of denudation on the face, trunk, and extremities. Flat atypical targets are round, non-palpable lesions reminiscent of EM but with only two zones and/or a poorly defined border. Macules are non-palpable, erythematous or purpuric spots with irregular shape and size, and often confluent. Blisters often occur on all or part of the macule (Fig. 30.1B).

In TEN, the cutaneous lesions begin suddenly with burning and painful red skin, often symmetrically distributed on the face and chest that rapidly extends over the skin surface, including the trunk and proximal extremities. The maximal extension of the lesions is obtained in 3 to 4 days, and sometimes in a few hours.5,8 The hallmark of TEN is a widespread necrosis and detachment of full-thickness epidermis (Figs 30.1C and 30.1D). A positive Nikolsky’s sign may be present, where there is detachment of the full-thickness epidermis when light lateral pressure is applied with the examining finger. Re-epithelialization of the epidermis begins about 1 week after onset of the skin lesions, and most of the skin surface is re-epithelialized in 2 to 3 weeks.

Death usually results from sepsis or multi-organ failure. In the Power et al.20 and Chang et al.13 studies, the most frequent causes of mortality were overwhelming sepsis, respiratory failure, and renal failure. The SCORTEN (TEN-specific severity of illness score) scale25,26 was developed as a tool to predict the severity of the disease and risk of mortality, with prognostic factors, including age, amount of body surface area involved, heart rate, and renal function (Table 30.5).

Table 30.5

SCORTEN Scale: Prognostic Factors for SJS and TEN

Buy Membership for Opthalmology Category to continue reading. Learn more here
Variable Value
Age > 40 years