7 Epilepsy
Introduction
Extrapolating from this, epilepsy is not a satisfactory diagnosis. It represents a symptom of another underlying diagnosis that has provoked the seizures. This has translated into an internationally accepted classification of seizures (see Fig 7.1),1 which offers the road map to provide treatment options.
There is also an internationally accepted classification of the epilepsies2 (note the plural) provided to allow the clinician to acknowledge that one type of epilepsy may incorporate numerous seizure types (see Box 7.1).
Box 7.1 Some typical syndromes
The classification of the epilepsies also permits prediction of prognosis, thereby making both classifications part and parcel of a better understanding of the condition. An easier way to describe this is that the description of seizures offers phenomenology of the event, and description of the epilepsies provides a syndromal approach. As these classifications should mirror current knowledge, the leaders in the field are constantly trying to improve their content and suggesting enhanced pedagogy.3
Diagnosis of Epilepsy
A comprehensive history is the principal tool of all neurology. The patient often is unable to report exactly what happened during the seizure due to loss of consciousness, but the doctor should not capitulate at this point. The patient should be able to describe what they were doing just before the seizure and any preliminary symptoms, such as the perception of bad smell (e.g. burning rubber), bad taste (e.g. metallic taste), or a feeling that the unfamiliar is familiar (déjà vu—I have seen it before) or the opposite (jamais vu—the familiar is unfamiliar—I have not seen it before). The patient may be able to identify flashing lights as a photic stimulation that provoked the seizure, but this only occurs in approximately 10% of people with epilepsy.4 Stress, fatigue, sleep deprivation, drugs, alcohol or even sleep itself can provoke seizures. Menstruation and hormonal changes may cause seizures. Most of this information is readily available from the patient if the right questions are asked (see Table 7.1).
Question | Answers pointing to epilepsy |
---|---|
When and where did the seizure occur? |
The patient will know if they bit their tongue, buccal mucosa or injured themselves in a seizure. Similarly, they can report if they were incontinent of urine or faeces. The patient will also know how they felt in the post-ictal period, whether they were confused, disoriented, exhausted and had to sleep, or if they had a headache. Thus the history from the patient is very helpful (see Table 7.1).
In addition, a history from any eyewitness will help the doctor to ascertain a word picture of what occurred during the seizure. Questions should include: did the patient appear absent; were there automatisms (automatic behaviour such as smacking lips, fiddling with clothing, involuntary behaviour or apparently purposeful activity for which the patient has no recall); did the patient turn the head to one or the other side; where, if identified, did the seizure start (such as in one hand or in the face to then move throughout the body); were the eyes open or shut (often used to differentiate non-epileptic, pseudo-seizures from truly epileptic phenomena where eyes are open); did the patient shake, twitch, talk, writhe, flail or do anything else during the episode? (See Table 7.2.)
Seizure type | Description |
---|---|
Simple partial seizure (SPS) | Consciousness retained but focal features determined by site of seizure, such as perception of a smell, a sound or a vision. Uncontrolled movement or twitching of a part of the body, such as a thumb or hand, without loss of consciousness, which may spread (such as Jacksonian march in focal motor seizure). |
Complex partial seizure (CPS) | Differentiated from SPS by altered state of consciousness. Patient may be unaware or poorly relate to the surrounding environment as with déjà vu (false memory) or jamais vu (blocked real memory). The patient, while non-responsive, may have automatisms—automatic behaviour that can be quite complex—such as driving a car. The appearance may be of a patient on automatic pilot. The patient has post-ictal features of fatigue, headache or confusion. ‘Absence’ with post-ictal features may be CPS rather than generalised absence. |
Secondarily generalised seizure | This is a convulsive seizure that follows focal onset. A convulsion in which the patient reports an aura (representing a focal seizure) is experiencing secondary generalisation (2° gend) throughout the brain. |
Typical absence | The patient has generalised absence that is short lived and often multiple, possibly provoked by hyperventilation. There is often no post-ictal feature. |
Atypical absence | Similar to typical absence but may have automatisms. Differentiation from CPS may be difficult. EEG with typical 3 Hz spike and wave pattern may be necessary to differentiate from CPS, which will have more focal, often temporal lobe abnormality. |
Tonic seizure | Drop attacks with hands and arms often coming up in front of the body and the head dropping forward as the patient becomes stiff and falls down, usually forward. |
Myoclonic seizure | Sudden jerking of limbs and head—often first thing in the morning after waking. A form of generalised seizure without focal features. |
Tonic clonic seizure | Primarily generalised convulsive seizure starting abruptly without focal features. Similar features to 2° gend but without focality—no aura at onset. |
After spending considerable effort to define the seizure the next step is to determine if there are precipitating factors, such as illness, genetic influences (with family history), or exposure to toxins. An obstetric history looking for birth trauma is important, as is any other history of brain damage from accidents, assaults or trauma. An educational history gives a clue regarding poor cognition and possible impaired function. A past history of febrile convulsions is worth seeking as is the detailed past medical and surgical history.
Investigation of the Patient with Epilepsy
a Electroencephalograph
One of the first tests is an electroencephalograph (EEG). It is imperative for the family doctor to appreciate that 10% of ‘normal’ patients can have an abnormal EEG and, at the same time, a person with epilepsy can have a normal EEG.5 If ten interictal EEGs are performed in a person with diagnosed epilepsy, 25% will all be abnormal, 60% will have at least one abnormal study and 15% will have all ten studies being normal. A typical epileptiform EEG is helpful when making the diagnosis, but a vaguely abnormal or completely normal EEG is neither helpful nor unhelpful.