CHAPTER 62 Emerging Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Meningiomas
INTRAOPERATIVE IMAGING
Image-guided neurosurgery using a navigation system in the traditional operating room is important in the management of many meningiomas because it can localize the tumor and critical structures around it. Intraoperative imaging is a useful further development because it compensates for brain shift, allows accurate navigation, and gives verification of what has been done surgically before the patient leaves the operating room.1 Current intraoperative imaging modalities offering real-time imaging are computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound. Other modalities may help define the tumor by cellular techniques—these include photodynamic imaging, radio immune imaging, and infrared imaging with ala or other material. These extend the capacity of the surgeon significantly but are not discussed here.
Brain shift may result from fluid shifts, reduction in tumor volume as the tumor is resected, changes in arterial pCO2, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) loss after opening of the dura.2–5 It makes guidance from preoperative images potentially and variably inaccurate. Intraoperative brain surface deformations greater than 10 mm have been documented within 1 hour of opening the dura. The error induced by this type of shift may be even larger in the presence of hydrocephalus or preexisting loss of parenchymal volume. Intra-operative imaging was in part created to overcome the effect of brain shifting.
CT in Intraoperative Imaging
CT has good tissue resolution but has traditionally been limited to uniplanar imaging and has the disadvantage of radiation of the patient and surgical team. As post-processing becomes more sophisticated and as radiation doses lessen, these may become less important. Lunsford and colleagues have extensive experience with CT in guiding tumor resection.6
Intraoperative Ultrasonography
Ultrasound is less expensive and less bulky than CT or MRI. It guides operative neurosurgery by differences in physical properties of the tumor and may show vasculature, which is quite helpful in larger meningiomas. Images may be difficult to interpret because echogenic structures may not reliably discern normal from abnormal tissue, and air bubbles or blood products in the surgical field may cause misinterpretation of ultrasound images.7–9 It is a potentially important modality, however, for working within the surgical field once it is exposed, and its importance for assessing residual tumor and vascularity in skull-base meningiomas has not been evaluated. As new three-dimensional systems become available, this may be the most widely available and useful technique for intraoperative imaging.7
Intraoperative MRI
Intraoperative MRI allows multiplanar imaging of changes during surgery, accurate navigation, immediate assessment of such complications as hemorrhage, and verification of the planned resection. The first system was the GE Signa 0.5 tesla “double doughnut” installed at Brigham & Women?’s Hospital (BWH) in 1994.1 The first brain tumor extirpation guided by intraoperative magnetic resonance was in 1996 at BWH. Multiplanar imaging, tissue discrimination, and absence of ionizing radiation have all contributed to the development of MRI as a tool for guiding interventional procedures, and there are more than 50 installations worldwide at the time of writing of this chapter.8–18 Imaging sequences such as MR spectroscopy, functional MR, diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion weighted imaging, MR angiography, and MR venography, are all possible with high-field systems and can significantly influence the decision-making process of the neurosurgeon.