Echocardiographic Assessment of Heart Failure Resulting from Coronary Artery Disease

Published on 21/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 21/06/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4195 times

6 Echocardiographic Assessment of Heart Failure Resulting from Coronary Artery Disease

Martin St. John Sutton, Yan Wang, Theodore J. Plappert

Acute and Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure

Basic Principles

• Heart failure (HF) is caused by coronary artery disease (CAD) in more than 65% of patients and may be acute or chronic. There are two major causes of acute post–myocardial infarction (MI) HF:

• First, MI involving the loss of 25% to 35% of the LV precipitates acute HF because the remaining myocytes cannot sustain a normal cardiac output.
• The second cause of acute HF post-MI is due to the onset of volume overload from mitral regurgitation (MR) or rupture of the ventricular septum producing a ventricular septal defect (VSD). These complications usually occur 3 to 5 days post-MI.

• Chronic HF results from progressive LV dilatation due to stretching of the infarct zone and expansion of the normal remote myocardium.
• LV dilatation increases wall stress that induces hypertrophy to normalize LV load and redistribute the elevated wall stress uniformly within the LV walls.
• Increased wall stress and neurohormonal activation drive the remodeling process, favoring LV dilatation and deterioration in function until a new equilibrium is reached between restraining forces exerted by the extracellular matrix and distending forces that promote LV dilatation.
• Myocardial repair involves collagen deposition and scar formation that provide an ideal substrate for re-entrant ventricular arrhythmias.
• Early diagnosis and treatment of HF is important because the prognosis of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV heart failure is poor (50% at 5 years).
• Doppler echocardiography provides a unique array of metrics for risk-stratifying patients with acute as well as chronic heart failure.

Key Points

• The hallmark of HF due to CAD is regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) (Figure 6-1).
• Knowledge of the distribution of coronary artery blood flow in the 17-segment model of the LV is important for identifying the culprit coronary artery and the likely location of the flow-limiting coronary stenosis (Figure 6-2). Subtle RWMA at rest can be amplified by exercise or pharmacologic stress.
• In ischemic cardiomyopathy with a dilated LV and an ejection fraction (EF) less than 20%, it may be difficult to rule out RWMA because endocardial excursion is severely reduced.
• LV regional wall thickness and systolic wall thickening are reduced in infarcted myocardium.
• Variation in the composition of the LV walls causes a heterogeneous acoustic signature from the myocardium, with increased brightness in infarcted regions due to the increased fibrosis (Figure 6-3).
• LV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and volumes are both increased. The increase in end-systolic volume (ESV) is greater than the increase in end-diastolic volume (EDV), accounting for the fall in ejection fraction in acute HF.
• Percent fractional shortening:

image

Figure 6-1 The hallmark of HF resulting from CAD is the presence of RWMAs. Upper panels: A 4-chamber view at end-diastole and at end-systole of a HF patient with an RWMA involving the mid- to apical anterior septum that exhibits contraction at the base and akinesis of the distal septum consistent with an anteroseptal infarction in the LAD territory. Lower panels: Abnormal regional LV function in parasternal long-axis views at end-diastole (left panel) and at end-systole (right panel) with a thin scarred inferior LV wall consistent with infarction in the right coronary artery territory.

image

Figure 6-2 Color-coded schema of the coronary artery anatomy (left), and the 17-myocardial-segment model color-coded for the coronary artery perfusion of the segments (right).

image

Figure 6-3 Left parasternal echocardiographic images of the LV long axis in diastole (left panel) and in systole (right panel) showing a thin and scarred distal septum (arrowhead). This occurs due to greater reflection of the ultrasound by the infarct than by the adjacent normal myocardium as a result of the greater content of fibrosis.

image

is decreased in HF.

• The LV ejection fraction (LVEF) is usually less than 40%:

image

• LV size as linear dimensions or LV volumes provides unique prognostic information for early risk stratification in HF. LV shortening and LVEF are both strong predictors of survival and adverse cardiovascular events.
• Meridional and circumferential wall stress can be calculated from echocardiographic measurements of wall thickness, cavity radius, cavity length, and LV pressure (Figure 6-4). Wall stress is a major determinant of hypertrophy and structural and functional LV remodeling. Calculation of wall stress requires that two contingencies be met—that the LV behaves uniformly without regional abnormalities (RWMAs) and that the material properties of myocardium are constant. Neither of these contingencies is met in ischemic HF. However, longitudinal, radial, and circumferential myocardial strain can be measured and used as surrogates for wall stress.
• Early detection of complications of acute post-MI HF is essential. These include LV thrombus, MR, VSD, pericardial effusion, right ventricular (RV) infarction, increase in QRS duration, and LV dyssynchrony.
image

Figure 6-4 Formulas for end-systolic meridional wall stress (Sm) and end-systolic circumferential wall stress (Sc). Ac, LV short axis cavity area; At, the total area of the LV short axis enclosed by the epicardium; L, LV cavity length; P, LV pressure.

Quantification of LV Size and Function in HF

Basic Principles

Step 1

• M-mode echocardiography measurements of LV size in patients with CAD, RWMA, and abnormal LV shape may not be representative of the heart as a whole.
• Use of systolic shortening or LVEF derived from linear dimensions should be avoided for similar reasons in ischemic HF.

Step 2

• LV size in HF due to CAD should be estimated as LV volumes.
• Paired images of the apical 4-chamber and 2-chamber views should be used to estimate LV volumes using Simpson’s rule and indexed to body surface area (BSA) or height.
• LV cavity lengths should be similar in the two apical images to avoid foreshortening of the cavity, causing spuriously small volumes.
• Quantification of LV volumes at end-diastole and at end-systole (Figure 6-5) enables calculation of LVEF:

image

Figure 6-5 Quantification of LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDD) and end-systolic volume (LVESD) from paired biplane images of the LV apical 4-chamber (A4C) and LV apical 2-chamber (A2C) views as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography.

(Reprinted with permission from Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:1446.)

image

Step 3

• LVEF is often assessed visually by experienced echocardiographers, and correlates closely with LVEF calculated from digitized biplane images.
• The correlation above breaks down in large left ventricles with EF less than 30% and distorted LV cavity shape.
• The myocardial performance index (MPI) or Tei index has been used as an indicator of LV function that is determined as:

image

where IVRT is the isovolumic relaxation time, IVCT is the isovolumic contraction time, and LVET is the LV ejection time.

• Regional LV function is estimated visually using the 17-segment model during rest and stress. The overall wall motion score predicts cardiac outcome.
• Regional LV function can also be evaluated using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), in which myocardial velocities are measured. In ischemic or infarcted regions, myocardial velocities are reduced to below normal (Figure 6-6).
image

Figure 6-6 Graphic display of myocardial velocities from the septal and lateral walls at the level of the MV annulus throughout the cardiac cycle in a normal subject (A) and in a patient with HF due to CAD (B). Note that, in the normal subject, the two velocities track and peak simultaneously, while in the patient with CAD, there is a delay in the time to peak septal and peak lateral wall velocities (arrows).

Step 4

• Regional myocardial ischemia can be located by measuring regional strain using speckle tracking. Myocardial strain (S) is defined as the change in length (ΔL) at end systole as a function of resting length (L0) and strain rate is the rate of change of strain with time:

image

image

• Strain can be measured from the apex to base as longitudinal strain. The echo-derived values for myocardial strain have been validated against magnetic resonance imaging and have correlated closely both in healthy normal subjects and in a number of disease entities. Ischemic or infarcted myocardial segments in HF associated with CAD can be identified by the depressed regional and global longitudinal strain values and by the different times to peak strain from the various myocardial regions in the infarcted/ischemic versus normal segments (Figure 6-7).
image

Figure 6-7 Graphic display of systolic strain in a normal subject (A, C, and E) and a patient with an antero-apical LV aneurysm (B, D, and F). Global strain (GS) and regional myocardial strain are both severely reduced (B and D) in the patient with CAD and HF, and the normal exquisite synchrony of the timing of peak strain is lost.

Echocardiographic Detection of Thrombus in HF

Basic Principles

• Thrombus usually occurs at the LV apex or adjacent to a region of LV wall that is severely hypokinetic or dyskinetic. The amplitude of endocardial motion in the infarct zone is low, such that there is slow adjacent intracavitary blood flow velocity that looks like “smoke” and is a precursor of thrombus formation.
• Left atrial (LA) dilatation is common in HF due to high filling pressures. LA thrombus is especially frequent in the LA and the LA appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Thrombus in the left heart chambers has the potential for cardioembolism, causing stroke or loss of organ function. Detection of LV thrombus is of paramount importance because appropriate anticoagulation can be instituted immediately.

Key Points

Step 1

• Detection of LV thrombus is optimized when the overall gain settings are high or “overgained.”
• The diagnosis must be confirmed by visualization in at least two orthogonal views (Figure 6-8).
• Thrombus appears as a homogeneous mass with no discernible architecture and a different acoustic signature from the myocardium. Thrombus is most frequently located at the LV apex, adherent to an infarct zone or in the LA (Figure 6-9).
image

Figure 6-8 Left ventricular thrombus adherent at the apex of the cavity where there is an apical wall motion abnormality shown by the absence of endocardial motion from diastole (upper left panel) to systole (upper right panel). Lower panels: Short-axis images at the apex of the LV demonstrating a large clot (C).

image

Figure 6-9 An apical 4-chamber view of the heart showing a dilated left atrium (LA) with a large sessile mural thrombus within it (arrowheads).

Step 2

• The morphology of the thrombus determines its likelihood for embolization. The features of thrombus associated with embolism are large size, convexity toward the LV cavity, and excessive mobility.
• The prevalence of LV thrombus in acute HF post-MI is reported to vary from 30% to 50%.
• The LV apex should be examined in all three standard apical views as it may be difficult to differentiate thrombus from LV trabeculations at the apex. This may be facilitated by using a high-frequency short-focus transducer to acquire “off-axis” images, apical long axis and tomographic transaxial images to include the LV apex (see Figure 6-8).

Step 3

• If there is still doubt as to the presence of LV thrombus, enhancing endocardial definition with intravenous contrast presents the thrombus as a filling defect within the contrast-filled LV cavity (Figure 6-10). Transesophageal echocardiography can be used to confirm or rule out intracardiac thrombus.
image

Figure 6-10 Laminated LV thrombus that required intravenous contrast (Definity) to enhance endocardial definition to establish the presence of thrombus (TH).

Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Defect

Basic Principles

• Persistent refractory acute HF or new-onset intractable HF several days post-MI should suggest severe LV volume overload due to MR (Figure 6-11) or rupture of the interventricular septum into the right ventricle (VSD) (Figure 6-12).
• Distinguishing the two mechanical lesions purely on the auscultatory features of a harsh holosystolic murmur is unreliable despite claims to the contrary.
• Doppler echocardiography removes the clinical doubt because color flow Doppler technology enables unequivocal localization of the VSD and at the same time can rule out MR (see Figure 6-12).
• The size of the defect in the ventricular septum can often be visualized directly and semiquantified by the maximal width of the color flow Doppler jet.
image

Figure 6-11 Color flow Doppler velocity mapping showing moderate MR with the regurgitant blood flow extending to the roof of the LA and penetrating the pulmonary veins in a patient with HF.

Buy Membership for Cardiovascular Category to continue reading. Learn more here

Related posts:

Role of Echocardiography in Patients Treated with Cardiotoxic Drugs Evaluation of the Patient with Diastolic Dysfunction Echocardiography in Cardiac Transplantation Echocardiography in the Patient with Right Heart Failure Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Echocardiographic Evaluation of Ventricular Support Devices