Easing Distress When Death is Near

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1456 times

36 Easing Distress When Death is Near

What is a good death? When asked, many adults facing the end of life hope to control pain and other distressing symptoms, have a sense of preparation for death, and achieve a sense of completion; however, other factors important to quality at the end of life differ by the individual.1 For some, a child’s death can never be good. Nevertheless, as palliative care clinicians, we can aspire to enable a better death experience for the child and family when we are faced with the inevitability of a child dying. This chapter will review strategies aimed at trying to achieve this outcome.

Importantly, when a child is dying, all care goals may not be uniformly focused on easing suffering. Recent studies affirm the common clinical experience that even when a child’s illness is said to be incurable, parents will hope to extend life concurrent with ensuring comfort.2,3 Family values will differ: While some aspire for a peaceful end of life experience for their child, others value another approach, as stated by one father:

In other words, it is a fight to the bitter end. As clinicians, however, it is critical to remember that whatever the primary goal of care and setting, care should never be at the exclusion of ensuring comfort.

Of note, studies that assess quality of life at the very end of life in children are limited. Thus clinical experience based upon consensus and the existing literature guide the content of this chapter.

Nurse Psychosocial clinician Child life specialist Chaplain Pharmacist

Recognizing When Death Is Imminent

Dying is a dynamic process. Though the process is influenced by many factors, it is remarkable how similar it can be despite very different underlying illnesses. Clinical experience suggests that when approaching death, a child typically experiences the following constellations of findings. The child is often bedridden, semiconscious, with little or no oral intake, and changes in pulse, respiration and peripheral circulation may also be apparent (Box 36-1).5

Brain death

Typical signs of dying may not be present when a child is brain dead and is still receiving cardiorespiratory support. In children, brain death most commonly arises from traumatic brain injury due to child abuse, motor vehicle accidents, or asphyxia.6 Though there is general acceptance of the definition of brain death, it may still be difficult for parents and other loved ones to grasp this reality because the child may not appear dead. The clinical neurological examination remains the standard for the determination of brain death and has been adopted by most countries. The declaration of brain death requires not only a series of careful neurologic tests but also the establishment of the cause of coma, the ascertainment of irreversibility, the resolution of any misleading clinical neurologic signs, the interpretation of the findings on neuroimaging, and the performance of any confirmatory laboratory tests that are deemed necessary (Box 36-2).6 Despite medical consensus of the definition of brain death, not all religions officially accept this definition of death.7 Depending on the family’s beliefs and those of spiritual or religious advisers, families rarely disagree with this death pronouncement but conflict resolution may require ethics consultation and/or judicial involvement. Nonetheless, a thorough understanding of brain death can aid in conversations with families. Once cardiorespiratory support is discontinued, the typical signs of dying ensue.

Key communication topics

Several communication topics are discussed in detail in Section 2, and will therefore not be covered in this chapter. Notably, however, anticipatory guidance can help prepare families for the child’s end-of-life course and ease the child’s and family’s distress. Proposed timing for key communication topics in children with advanced life-threatening illness is as follows:

Following death:

Bereavement guidance. (Chapter 5) Parents have reported finding face-to-face visits following the child’s death to be very helpful in their bereavement.8,9

There are several key principles in managing the child’s final days. An analytical approach to symptom control continues, but usually relies on clinical findings rather than investigation. Drugs should be reviewed with regard to need and route of administration. Some patients manage to take oral drugs until near their death, but many require an alternative route. Finally, it is essential that the care team maintains effective communication and ensures that support is in place for the family. A daily visit for inpatients or a daily phone call at a planned time can be very reassuring for families. Experience suggests that clinician home visits from the hospital-based team are greatly appreciated throughout the entire palliative care course, and data suggest that this is especially valued at the end of a patient’s life.10

Importantly, even when the child may be comfortable and symptoms are well controlled, a caregiver’s mere presence during the final period can be very comforting to family members. Such a presence reinforces that the dying patient’s welfare remains important, and it provides support and guidance to the family at a time of extreme stress. It is critical to inform the family that although death may be imminent, the time frame may be hours to days. It is essential to ensure that someone will be available to pronounce the child’s death, especially when the child is not in the hospital.

Easing Child Distress

When a child is actively dying, and there is consensus that the primary focus of care should be on comfort, there is much that the interdisciplinary team can do to permit a more natural death experience. Continued medical interventions, including vital sign assessments, pulse oximetry, nonessential medications and blood work, may be disruptive and no longer beneficial to the child’s care. However, discussion of discontinuing these procedures is delicate and can be perceived as no longer caring for the child. This is especially true among families who are used to vigilantly monitoring their child. Parents should be made aware that discontinuing these procedures allows them time to be with the child without interference from intermittent procedures, wires and tape, and/or sounds from alarms. Gentle suggestions can be made that discontinuing monitors would enable the family to focus entirely on the child, rather than the surrounding medical equipment. As always, flexibility is essential. Some families may simply not want to forgo what they are used to and will often state that the vital sign assessment and/or the monitor will help them know when the child’s time has come.

Drowsiness and altered consciousness

Diminished wakefulness is also very common during the last days of life13 and is often desirable for the child and family. However, it is also not uncommon for parents and loved ones to want to hold onto every wakeful moment possible. At times this desire can hinder titration of pain-relieving medications because of the worry of further limiting wakefulness. The team should continue efforts to try for a careful balance of comfort and an ability to interact, while at the same time encourage the family to continue their own interactions, such as gentle hugging or touching, talking or singing, with the hope that the child perceives such gestures. One family reread aloud the first book of the Harry Potter series to their dying child, hoping that the story would bring as much joy to him as it had previously.

Escalating pain, dyspnea, and agitation

Three highly common symptoms that may require intensive treatment efforts are escalating pain, dyspnea, and agitation during the final days of life. Full details for management of these distressing symptoms can be found in Chapters 2831, and 32. One challenge to successful management is variability among providers in the approach to medication titration. Children’s Hospital Boston examined adequate symptom management in children with cancer at the end of life and found the following barriers to care:14

In response to these findings, an interdisciplinary taskforce developed guidelines and a standardized order set to achieve greater consistency in medication titration and symptom management outcomes (Box 36-3). When a patient experiences a refractory symptom that cannot be captured through appropriate titration of symptom-relieving medications as described, then sedation to unconsciousness, or palliative sedation, may be indicated. Full details related to consideration, discussion and administration of palliative sedation can be found in Chapter 23.

BOX 36-3 Guidelines for Management of Escalating Pain, Dyspnea, or Agitation at the End of Life

Adapted from Children’s Hospital Boston Guidelines for Management of Escalating Pain/Dyspnea/Agitation at the End of Life. Boston, Mass. Revised 9/2000. All rights reserved.

Example: Dose #1 is starting/loading dose 10 mg 1 x previous dose 10 mg Increase to 1.5 x previous dose 15 mg 1 x previous dose 15 mg Increase to 1.5 x previous dose 22.5 mg

Noisy breathing

Breathing can become particularly noisy when death is imminent and is often described as the death rattle. This is more common in patients with primary lung disease or brain tumors.15 It is critically important to prepare family members for this possibility. Because this symptom is often present when the child is already unconscious, the child may not experience this as uncomfortable. However, transdermal scopolamine, l-hyoscyamine drops for smaller patients and glycopyrrolate can be helpful in drying secretions and diminishing this symptom.1618 Treatment of what the family perceives as suffering should be a priority, even if there are differences of opinion within the care team.

Terminal emergencies

Rare circumstances can result in the child experiencing sudden high distress and some are best treated using more invasive strategies. Patients should be assessed for their risk of experiencing these complications so that effective interventions can be readily available. Such emergencies include:

Bowel Obstruction

Similarly there are effective strategies for the medical management of bowel obstruction, as delineated in Chapter 33; however, placement of nasogastric suctioning can provide the most immediate and sustained relief.

Delirium and/or Hallucinations

It is common for the child to become less coherent toward the end of life, however, overt hallucinations and agitation can be extremely distressing for both the child and family. Chapter 28 provides an extensive review of assessment and management of delirium. In truly end-of-life instances, the child may respond well to intermittent doses of haloperdol, which can be administered intravenously.

Ensuring comfort during special circumstances

There are times at the end of a child’s life when the process of either discontinuing certain medical interventions, such as fluids and nutrition, or beginning acts such as initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, affect the experience of the child and family. When these special circumstances arise it is again helpful to prepare the family and child, if he or she is conscious.

When Fluids and Nutrition are Discontinued

Typically, as a child approaches end of life, there is little drive for drinking and eating, and older patients have indicated that this is not experienced as hunger or thirst.19 It is not uncommon, however, for children to be receiving medically administered fluid and/or nutrition near the end of life, and this may prolong dying without providing benefit in terms of comfort. Continued fluids and nutrition may even contribute to discomfort. For example, in a child dying from an advanced brain tumor, continued fluids can increase cerebral edema and headache. In a child with end-stage lung disease, continued fluid can increase secretions, and at times pulmonary edema, both of which can exacerbate dyspnea. In such circumstances, clinicians and parents may opt to discontinue medically administered fluid and nutrition. However, once discontinued and depending on how long a child is likely to survive, the child’s appearance may change over time. Anticipatory guidance is critical to helping the family through this end-of-life period. The following key considerations should be discussed:

When the Ventilator Is Discontinued

One of the most common ways a child typically dies in the intensive care unit (ICU) is through the discontinuation of ventilator support.2022 Though difficult to know with certainty, this decision is typically made when there is consensus that the underlying cause of ventilator dependence is irreversible, and continued ventilatory support will not result in a meaningful quality of life. The following considerations are important when the patient, when involved, the family, and the healthcare team reach consensus that ventilator support will be discontinued.

The counseling of families23 is a critical aspect of care for the patient who is to be removed from a ventilator. Before withdrawal, the following issues should be discussed:

Options for Ventilator Withdrawal

Two methods have been described for ventilator withdrawal:24 immediate extubation and terminal weaning. The clinician’s and patient’s comfort, and the family’s perceptions, should influence the choice. In immediate extubation, the endotracheal tube is removed after appropriate suctioning. Humidified air or oxygen is given to prevent the airway from drying. This is the preferred approach to relieve discomfort if the patient is conscious, the volume of secretions is low, and the airway is unlikely to be compromised after extubation. A patient likely to experience significant hemoptysis, for example, may benefit from a terminal wean with the gradual reduction in oxygen and/or ventilator rate at a pace not faster than pharmacologic sedation is administered to treat objective signs of distress from the effects of hypoventilation and hypoxia. In terminal weaning, the ventilator rate, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and oxygen levels are decreased while the endotracheal tube is left in place. Terminal weaning may be carried out over a period of as little as 30 minutes, or it can be longer. If the patient survives and it is decided to leave the endotracheal tube in place, a Briggs T-piece can be placed.

The following are suggested steps to ensure smooth withdrawal of ventilator support:

Symptom Control

The most common symptoms related to ventilator withdrawal are breathlessness and anxiety. Opioids and benzodiazepines are the primary medications used to provide comfort, typically requiring doses that cause sedation to achieve good symptom control. The dose needed to control symptoms will depend on the neurological status of the patient and the amount of similar medication used up to the time of extubation. In unconscious patients, it should not be assumed that they will not experience distress, and symptom-relieving medications should be administered in advance of planned extubation. Patients who are awake at the time extubation or in whom significant amounts of opioids and benzodiazepines have been used previously will require greater dosages or a change to a barbiturate to achieve symptom control.25 Medication titration should proceed according to guidelines discussed in Chapter 23.

Clinical Vignette

Jamal was a 3-year-old boy with a history of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy who was admitted to the intensive care unit with aspiration pneumonia requiring intubation. This was the fourth intensive care unit admission in 6 months. After 3 weeks of care in the ICU, and several unsuccessful attempts at extubation, the family was approached about tracheostomy placement and chronic ventilation. After extensive consultation with the pediatric palliative care team, his parents came to the decision that Jamal had been through enough, that despite the doctors’ best efforts his condition continued to deteriorate. They expressed the desire that he be allowed to die. They also expressed the hope that he die at home, despite the fact that they lived 3 hours away in a rural area.

Extensive discussions were held with the ICU staff about the following concerns:

Many interdisciplinary conversations were held to ease the worries of the ICU team. Arrangements for support at home were made in advance of the transport. Ultimately, Jamal was taken home by the transport team and the palliative care physician. He was stable during the journey. His extended family was at his home when he arrived. They said their farewells, and Jamal received the sacrament of the sick from his local priest. Also present were his pediatrician and two nurses from a local hospice. Jamal received 2 mg morphine and 1 mg midazolam, and was then removed from the ventilator. He was given four morphine rescue doses and two midazolam rescue doses through his pump for respiratory rate of greater than 50 breaths per minutes and increased work of breathing as assessed by clinicians or his parents. He died peacefully in his mother’s arms 75 minutes after extubation. The family was extremely grateful that he was home to die.

Easing Family Distress

During a resuscitative effort

Approximately 75% of children who experience pulseless cardiac arrest in the hospital, and 90% of those who experience an out-of-hospital arrest will die.26,27 Most hospitals are instituting efforts to pre-empt unexpected cardiorespiratory arrest by instituting protocols to promote early transfer to the ICU.28 Despite these efforts, codes continue to occur and efforts should be made to attend to the family’s distress. Such efforts include identifying a point person for the family, who can serve as a constant presence during the resuscitative effort, provide regular updates, answer questions and make every effort to meet the family’s needs. Families are now regularly invited to be present during resuscitative efforts. The data suggest that when they are present, there is less anxiety, litigation, and second-guessing regarding the efforts and competence of the staff providing that care.29

The lingering child

Clinical experience suggests that it is not uncommon for families to express distress regarding the length of time it is taking for the child to die when active dying lasts for hours or days. It is impossible to imagine the enormity of the distress associated with this period of time, the ambivalence of feelings related to wanting to hold on to every moment versus not being able to bear a moment longer at the child’s bedside. Anticipatory guidance aimed at preparing families for this period can be helpful. Further, suggesting ways to be with the child can also ease family distress. Communication strategies include:

Management of visitors is a key role of the healthcare team. For some families, being surrounded by extended family and friends is critical, for others it is unbearable. Inquiring about what is most comforting is essential.

Throughout this period, attention to the child’s comfort remains the top priority and if suffering is perceived by loved ones and clinicians, medications should be further titrated.

Hastening death

Rarely, a parent will overtly request that the child’s death be intentionally hastened,30 and this is most commonly associated with parental fears about child suffering. Euthanasia is legal only in the Netherlands22,31,32 and is for children either younger than 1 year old or older than 12 and who are considered able to provide assent. Euthanasia for minors is also under consideration in Belgium.33 There are no legal hastening options for minors in North America. Yet, if the parent requests hastening, it is important to respond with more than just a statement that hastening is not legally permissible. Just as other requests should be explored to identify underlying meaning and fears, so should this type of request. Explanation of legal and effective alternatives, such as further titration of symptom-relieving medications and palliative sedation, is helpful.

Clinical Vignette

Eddie was 6-year-old boy with advanced metastatic alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. The primary lesion involved his face and neck, and he also had pulmonary and bone marrow metastases. His parents wanted to be prepared for what to expect for his end-of-life course and the palliative care team offered the following information. One significant concern was that Eddie’s tumor would progress locally faster than in his lungs and bone marrow and, as a result, he was at high risk for upper airway obstruction and suffocation at the end of life. The family was also told about progressive dyspnea and fatigue, should other sites of disease progress faster. Upon hearing these possibilities his father, Charlie, asked whether Eddie’s life could be intentionally ended when he reached a stage when his life was no longer worth living. Rather than focusing on the illegal nature of such an action, Charlie was asked more about his worries and he described immense concerns about Charlie’s experience of suffering. In response, the physician gently informed him that we may not be able to tell when life was not worth living from Eddie’s perspective, but that every effort would be made to try to ensure his comfort. Eddie’s father was told about strategies for intensive symptom management and palliative sedation, if necessary.

Eddie did not suffer from dyspnea or upper airway obstruction. He simply became less and less responsive, and required minimal pain-relieving medications. He died peacefully surrounded by family, friends, and clinical caregivers. Several weeks following his death, Charlie reflected that had Eddie’s life been intentionally ended, it would have been treating his own suffering, and not Eddie’s.

At the Time of Death

There is no true standard for declaring that a patient has died. When a clinician enters the room and is not known to the family, an introduction and explanation of his or her purpose is warranted. Empathetic statements, such as “I am sorry for your loss,” can ease the distress, as can telling the family that they are welcome to stay while their loved one is examined.

After Death Care

The most important message to relay to parents is that nothing needs to be done in a hurry when their child dies. This is very much a private time for family to say their individual goodbyes. Saying goodbyes and performing rituals are important because they enable parents, siblings, and other family members to express their love, sorrow, relief, regrets, and share precious memories. Many will be guided by religious practices, which can vary considerably (Table 36-2). Washing the child for the last time, dressing the child in special clothes, taking photos, playing favorite music, praying together, touching and cuddling the child, talking to the child, taking foot and handprints, cutting a lock of hair and writing a message or poem for the child are all examples of rituals that families have found helpful and necessary.

Clinical Vignette

Laila was a 2-month-old girl with junctional epidermolysis bullosa, an often fatal disorder involving fragility of the skin and mucous membranes. Laila was being cared for in the neonatal intensive care unit, and with time, the primary hopes of her parents became focused on ensuring her comfort. Laila’s parents were newly arrived immigrants from China and they were living with paternal grandparents, also first generation immigrants. All family members were often present at the bedside. Laila’s mother, Hua, sought support from the pediatric palliative care team social worker to help reconcile two concerns. The first was that related to the families’ cultural background, photographs were not permitted. Hua felt caught between respecting tradition and her elders and wanting to have an image of her daughter. Through strategizing with the care team, she decided to seek permission from the family to obtain a passport for Laila. The family agreed, hoping that should Laila’s condition improve she could be brought to China for herbal remedies. The social worker arranged for representatives from the passport agency to come to the hospital to complete the application, which included taking a photograph. The passport was expedited and arrived just prior to Laila’s death.

Hua also said her in-laws had told her that she would need to leave Laila at the hospital following her death and they would not permit burial. They believed that if Laila were to be buried, her spirit would interfere with Hua being able to attach to future children. Despite this advice, Hua was desperate to know the place where Laila would be buried. Arrangements were made to bury her in the hospital’s burial grounds, where Hua could visit without the knowledge of her family.

When the family is ready, they need to phone the funeral home. If preparation for death has been encouraged, then most families will have already chosen the funeral director they wish to use. Parents need to inform the funeral director of the time they wish for the child’s body to be collected. It is very important that parents remain in control of the timing and they are not hurried. Funeral directors are on call 24 hours a day and parents can phone at any time. There may be an extra cost if the child needs to be taken after normal working hours.

If the family plans to be with the child’s body for a prolonged duration, then it may be helpful to gently prepare them for how the body will change over time.

Livor mortis

One of the early changes that can be observed is livor mortis, also referred to as lividity, postmortem hypostasis, vibices, and suggilations.38 This is a physical process. While the individual is alive, the heart circulates the blood. When death occurs, circulation stops and the blood begins to settle, by gravity, to the lowest portions of the body. This results in a discoloration of those lower, dependent parts of the body. Although beginning immediately, the first signs of livor mortis are typically seen about 1 hour following death, with full development being observed 2 to 4 hours following death.38

Rigor mortis

Rigor mortis is a chemical change resulting in a stiffening of the body’s muscles following death, resulting from changes in the myofribrils of the muscle tissues. Immediately following death, the body becomes limp and is easily flexed.38 As ATP is converted to ADP and lactic acid is produced lowering the cellular pH, locking chemical bridges are formed between actin and myosin resulting in formation of rigor. Typically, the onset of rigor is first observed 2 to 6 hours following death and develops over the first 12 hours. The onset begins with the muscles of the face and then spreads to all of the muscles during the next 4 to 6 hours. Rigor typically lasts from 24 to 84 hours, after which the muscles begin once again to relax.

Death in the hospital

Once the family has left the hospital, nurses typically prepare to do postmortem care by two staff members who can support one another. Preparation of the body will vary depending on hospital policy, religious and cultural preference, and whether or not the body will be examined by the medical examiner and/or an autopsy will be performed (see Table 36-2). When the body is formally examined, all indwelling lines and tubes must remain intact. Appropriate pads should be placed over puncture or wound sites and under the perineum to contain body fluids if necessary. The body should be dressed in a hospital gown or clothing designated by family.

Staff commemoration

With the death of a child, whether that child has been cared for by staff for a short or long time, there are various ways in which to commemorate the child. At the same time, these actions often provide opportunities for self-care. In a study of more than 200 pediatric critical care specialists, 79% contacted families following the death at least sometimes, 72% attended funerals, and only 2.5% thought that it was inappropriate for clinicians to attend funerals. A total of 76% agreed that follow-up contact helps the family, whereas 47% agreed that follow-up contact helps the physicians.39 For a more detailed description of staff commemorative activities see Chapter 18.

The condolence letter or card is one of the simplest gestures that can be made by a clinician and is typically highly valued by family members. Personal experience suggests that these notes are kept indefinitely and become a part of the child’s legacy. A good condolence letter has two goals: to offer tribute to the deceased and to be a source of comfort to the survivors. One of the greatest hurdles to writing these letters is simply finding the right words. Bedell and colleagues offer some concrete suggestions:40 One can begin the letter with a direct expression of sorrow about the death, such as “I am writing to send you my condolences on the death of your son.” Typical themes to include in the letter are:

Clinician acts of kindness and commemoration following a child’s death should not be taken lightly. In a qualitative study41 of bereaved parents whose child was in the care of the ICU three critical themes were identified:41

It is increasingly common for palliative care programs to offer longer-term bereavement support to families and these efforts are described in detail in Chapter 5.

Summary

Caring for a dying child is a truly intimate experience and a privilege that brings with it great sadness, but also enormous gifts, especially when clinicians are prepared to participate in this process and are given the opportunity to provide unhurried, compassionate care. The following case exemplifies such an experience.

Clinical Vignette

Mary was a 16-year-old girl with an advanced brain tumor and spinal metastases. Together with her family, her goals were to continue to strive for cancer control, but at the same time enjoy as much time at home in her community, which was several hours away from the hospital. She was passionate about attending school, being with family and friends, and painting (Fig. 36-1). Comprehensive support was put into place at home and Mary’s many symptoms were managed proactively. Her medication regimen was extensive including the following:

Oral Medication Indication
Dexamethasone 2 mg qid Cerebral edema
Omeprazole 20 mg bid Gastric prophylaxis
Bisacodyl 2 tabs bid Constipation
Ondansetron 8 mg tid Nausea
Metoclopramide 10 mg tid Nausea
Methadone 15 mg tid Pain
Methylphenidate 15 mg qam, 15 mg qnoon Daytime drowiness
Celecoxib 100 mg bid Antiangiogenic agent
Nortryptiline 20 mg qhs Neuropathic pain
Gabapentin 300 mg tid Neuropathic pain
Baclofen 15 mg tid Muscle spasm
Sertraline 100 mg qhs Depression, anxiety
Trazadone 25 mg qhs Depression, insomnia

Unfortunately, 1 month before death, Mary was admitted to the hospital in pain crisis and it took 3 days before her distress could be eased. The team was concerned that the only way to achieve comfort would be through palliative sedation, and Mary’s family was prepared for this possibility. But in true Mary fashion, despite substantial escalation of symptom-relieving medications, she woke up and was comfortable. The next phase of conversation related to whether it would be possible to transition Mary back home. Unfortunately, her home hospice team believed that they could not manage her complex regimen. Instead, she resided in the hospital’s homelike suite, “The Comfort Care Room,” for the final weeks of life. Fortunately, her community came to her. Mary continued to be involved in decision making. One such decision was related to her continuing to take food by mouth. Despite many hours of being asleep a day, Mary would regularly wake up in the morning and asked to be wheeled down to the cafeteria for a breakfast of bacon, eggs, and potatoes. However, her ability to swallow effectively was diminishing and she was at high risk for aspiration. Nonetheless, she chose to continue her passion of eating breakfast. Comfort was achieved through a modified medication regimen.

Intravenous Medication Indication
Dexamethasone 4 mg qid Cerebral edema
Ondansetron 8 mg tid Nausea
Methadone 10 mg qid Pain
Fentanyl 225 mcg/h PCA with 180 mcg bolus q6min Pain
Ativan 1.75 mg IV q4h, 1 mg IV q1h prn Anxiety
Haldol 1 mg IV q6h Anxiety, agitation, hallucinations
Scopolamine patch Excess secretions

Three days before death, Mary experienced an aspiration event and progressive respiratory distress. Opioids were further titrated to comfort. She died surrounded by family, friends, and the care team. As stated by Mary’s mother, “To me, the comfort corner room was beyond words in our last days with Mary. To have the safety of the hospital (doctors, nurses, all caregivers, Father Nee) and for all of us to be with her until the end was the ultimate blessing.”

Consistent with her passion for education and generous spirit, Mary’s family agreed to an autopsy. In her usual manner, the neuropathologist, Dr. Hannah Kinney, extensively reviewed Mary’s record and spoke with many clinicians in advance of performing the autopsy. Her discoveries inspired the following poem.

References

1 Steinhauser K.E., Christakis N.A., Clipp E.C., McNeilly M., McIntyre L., Tulsky J.A. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2476-2482.

2 Bluebond-Langner M., Belasco J.B., Goldman A., Belasco C. Understanding parents’ approaches to care and treatment of children with cancer when standard therapy has failed. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(17):2414-2419.

3 Wolfe J., Klar N., Grier H.E., et al. Understanding of prognosis among parents of children who died of cancer: impact on treatment goals and integration of palliative care. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2469-2475.

4 Davies B., Gudmundsdottir M., Worden B., Orloff S., Sumner L., Brenner P. “Living in the dragon’s shadow”: fathers’ experiences of a child’s life-limiting illness. Death Stud. 2004;28(2):111-135.

5 Bicanovsky L. Comfort Care: Symptom control in the dying. In: Walsh D., Caraceni A.T., Fainsinger R., et al, editors. Palliative medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2009.

6 Wijdicks E.F. The diagnosis of brain death. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(16):1215-1221.

7 Bulow H.H., Sprung C.L., Reinhart K., et al. The world’s major religions’ points of view on end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(3):423-430.

8 Kreicbergs U.C., Lannen P., Onelov E., Wolfe J. Parental grief after losing a child to cancer: impact of professional and social support on long-term outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(22):3307-3312.

9 Meert K.L., Eggly S., Pollack M., et al. Parents’ perspectives regarding a physician-parent conference after their child’s death in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr. 2007;151(1):50-55. 55 e51–55 e52

10 Cherin D.A., Enguidanos S.M., Jamison P. Physicians as medical center “extenders” in end-of-life care: physician home visits as the lynch pin in creating an end-of-life care system. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2004;23(2):41-53.

11 Sourkes B.M. The deepening shade: psychological aspects of life-threatening illness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1982.

12 Sourkes B.M. Armfuls of time : the psychological experience of the child with a life-threatening illness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995.

13 Drake R., Frost J., Collins J.J. The symptoms of dying children. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003;26(1):594-603.

14 Houlahan K.E., Branowicki P.A., Mack J.W., Dinning C., McCabe M. Can end of life care for the pediatric patient suffering with escalating and intractable symptoms be improved? J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2006;23:45-51.

15 Morita T., Tsunoda J., Inoue S., Chihara S. Risk factors for death rattle in terminally ill cancer patients: a prospective exploratory study. Palliat Med. 2000;14(1):19-23.

16 Wildiers H., Menten J. Death rattle: prevalence, prevention and treatment. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;23(4):310-317.

17 Bennett M., Lucas V., Brennan M., Hughes A., O’Donnell V., Wee B. Using anti-muscarinic drugs in the management of death rattle: evidence-based guidelines for palliative care. Palliat Med. 2002;16(5):369-374.

18 Back I.N., Jenkins K., Blower A., Beckhelling J. A study comparing hyoscine hydrobromide and glycopyrrolate in the treatment of death rattle. Palliat Med. 2001;15(4):329-336.

19 Dalal S., Del Fabbro E., Bruera E. Is there a role for hydration at the end of life? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2009;3(1):72-78.

20 Finan E., Bolger T., Gormally S.M. Modes of death in neonatal intensive care units. Ir Med J. 2006;99(4):106-108.

21 Sands R., Manning J.C., Vyas H., Rashid A. Characteristics of deaths in paediatric intensive care: a 10-year study. Nurs Crit Care. 2009;14(5):235-240.

22 Verhagen A.A., Dorscheidt J.H., Engels B., Hubben J.H., Sauer P.J. End-of-life decisions in Dutch neonatal intensive care units. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(10):895-901.

23 von Gunten C., Weissman D.E. Fast Fact and Concept #033: Ventilator Withdrawal Protocol (Part I). 2010. www.aahpm.org/cgi-bin/wkcgi/view?status=A%20&search=182&id=174&offset=0&limit=25. Accessed March 20

24 Campbell M.L. How to withdraw mechanical ventilation: a systematic review of the literature. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007;18(4):397-403. quiz 344–395

25 Truog R.D., Berde C.B., Mitchell C., Grier H.E. Barbiturates in the care of the terminally ill. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(23):1678-1682.

26 Nadkarni V.M., Larkin G.L., Peberdy M.A., et al. First documented rhythm and clinical outcome from in-hospital cardiac arrest among children and adults. JAMA. 2006;295(1):50-57.

27 Topjian A.A., Nadkarni V.M., Berg R.A. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15(3):203-208.

28 Parshuram C.S., Hutchison J., Middaugh K. Development and initial validation of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System score. Crit Care. 2009;13(4):R135.

29 Nibert L., Ondrejka D. Family presence during pediatric resuscitation: an integrative review for evidence-based practice. J Pediatr Nurs. 2005;20(2):145-147.

30. Dussel V., Joffe S., Hilden J.M., Watterson-Schaeffer J., Weeks J.C., Wolfe J. Considerations about hastening death among parents of children who die of cancer. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(3):231-237.

31 Verhagen A.A., Sauer P.J. End-of-life decisions in newborns: an approach from the Netherlands. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):736-739.

32 Vrakking A.M., van der Heide A., Arts W.F., et al. Medical end-of-life decisions for children in the Netherlands. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(9):802-809.

33 Pousset G., Bilsen J., De Wilde J., et al. Attitudes of adolescent cancer survivors toward end-of-life decisions for minors. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):e1142-e1148.

34 Cadge W., Ecklund E.H. Prayers in the clinic: how pediatric physicians respond. South Med J. 2009;102(12):1218-1221.

35 Fast Fact and Concept #120: Physicians and prayer requests. www.aahpm.org/cgi-bin/wkcgi/view?status=A%20&search=151&id=554&offset=0&limit=25. Accessed March 22, 2010

36 Fast Fact and Concept #004; Death Pronouncement in the Hospital.. www.aahpm.org/cgi-bin/wkcgi/view?status=A%20&search=126&id=95&offset=0&limit=25. Accessed March 22, 2010

37 National Association of Medical Examiners. http://thename.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=113&Itemid=58. Accessed March 17, 2010

38 Lee Goff M. Early post-mortem changes and stages of decomposition in exposed cadavers. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009;49(1–2):21-36.

39 Borasino S., Morrison W., Silberman J., Nelson R.M., Feudtner C. Physicians’ contact with families after the death of pediatric patients: a survey of pediatric critical care practitioners’ beliefs and self-reported practices. Pediatrics. 2008;122(6):e1174-e1178.

40 Bedell S.E., Cadenhead K., Graboys T.B. The doctor’s letter of condolence. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(15):1162-1164.

41 Macdonald M.E., Liben S., Carnevale F.A., et al. Parental perspectives on hospital staff members’ acts of kindness and commemoration after a child’s death. Pediatrics. 2005;116(4):884-890.