1 Distinguishing Systolic versus Diastolic Heart FailureA Practical Approach by Echocardiography
Left Ventricular Dimensions and Thickness
See Appendix for reference values.
Key Points
Limitations
Left Ventricular Systolic Function
Fractional Area Change
Key Points
Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction (Table 1-1)
Method | View | Pitfalls |
---|---|---|
Two-Dimensional Imaging | ||
Fractional shortening | PLAX or PSAX | Geometric Assumptions Based on a single cross section Ignores wall motion in nonmeasured segments |
Ejection fraction | (LVEDV − LVESV) × 100/LVEDV | Dependent on load and heart rate (HR) |
Modified Simpson’s rule | 4-chamber and 2-chamber | Foreshortening of apical views Poor visualization of anterior wall |
Area-length method | 4-chamber (LV area)2 × 0.85/LV end-diastolic length | Not appropriate for non-symmetrical LV Assumes cylindrical LV shape |
Bullet method | Mid-SAX and apical 4- chamber | LV shape assumption |
Wall motion score index | PLAX, PSAX, apical 4-, 2-, and 3-chamber Average endocardial thickening score of 16 or 17 segments |
Reader and center variability Requires visualization of all segments |
Exercise ejection fraction | As above | To detect incipient LV systolic dysfunction Usually eyeballed |
Three-dimensional volumes | Full-volume apical view | Resolution is dependent on 2D image quality |
Doppler Methods | ||
LV stroke volume | PLAX 2D and apical 5- or 3-chamber | Circular shape assumption of LV outflow tract (LVOT) Error in LVOT measurement Errors are squared |
LV dP/dt (mm Hg/s) | MR CW Doppler Σ Δt 1 m/s to 3 m/s, 32/Δt | Load independent Not always feasible |
MPI | Apical 5-chamber | Somewhat load dependent No geometric assumption |
Tissue Doppler | Apical views Objective data Less dependent on image quality Less dependent on reader expertise |
Somewhat load dependent Requires parallel angle of insonation Affected by translation, tethering, and respiration |
2D speckle tracking | Longitudinal Strain Not affected by Doppler angle |
Requires high frame rate Requires good 2D image resolution Decreased feasibility versus TDI |
Radial Strain Not affected by Doppler angle |
Key Points
Segmental Wall Motion
Key Points
LV Function Assessment by Tissue Doppler Imaging (Figure 1-9)
Key Points
LV Function Assessment by 2D Speckle Tracking (Figure 1-10)
Figure 1-10 Apical 4-chamber (A), 2-chamber (B), and 3-chamber (C) 2D strain maps and segmental strain scores along with bull’s-eye map (D) showing global strain (GS) and segmental strain values in the same patient as in Figure 1-8. Note reduced segmental strain values of −6 to −13% in the basal to midinferior and inferolateral segments consistent with transmural infarction. GS is mildly reduced at −16%. AVC, aortic valve closure.
Key Points
Methods Evaluating Combined Systolic and Diastolic Function
Myocardial Performance Index
Key Points