Distinguishing Systolic versus Diastolic Heart FailureA Practical Approach by Echocardiography

Published on 21/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Cardiovascular

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2982 times

1 Distinguishing Systolic versus Diastolic Heart FailureA Practical Approach by Echocardiography

Left Ventricular Dimensions and Thickness

See Appendix for reference values.

Key Points

These values are measured in the parasternal long-axis (PLAX) (Figure 1-1) or parasternal short-axis (PSAX) view using 2D or M-mode.

Left Ventricular Systolic Function

Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction (Table 1-1)

TABLE 1-1 ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF LEFT VENTRICULAR SYSTOLIC FUNCTION

Method View Pitfalls
Two-Dimensional Imaging
Fractional shortening PLAX or PSAX Geometric Assumptions
Based on a single cross section
Ignores wall motion in nonmeasured segments
Ejection fraction (LVEDV − LVESV) × 100/LVEDV Dependent on load and heart rate (HR)
Modified Simpson’s rule 4-chamber and 2-chamber Foreshortening of apical views
Poor visualization of anterior wall
Area-length method 4-chamber (LV area)2 × 0.85/LV end-diastolic length Not appropriate for non-symmetrical LV
Assumes cylindrical LV shape
Bullet method Mid-SAX and apical 4- chamber LV shape assumption
Wall motion score index PLAX, PSAX, apical 4-, 2-, and 3-chamber
Average endocardial thickening score of 16 or 17 segments
Reader and center variability
Requires visualization of all segments
Exercise ejection fraction As above To detect incipient LV systolic dysfunction
Usually eyeballed
Three-dimensional volumes Full-volume apical view Resolution is dependent on 2D image quality
Doppler Methods
LV stroke volume PLAX 2D and apical 5- or 3-chamber Circular shape assumption of LV outflow tract (LVOT)
Error in LVOT measurement
Errors are squared
LV dP/dt (mm Hg/s) MR CW Doppler Σ Δt 1 m/s to 3 m/s, 32/Δt Load independent
Not always feasible
MPI Apical 5-chamber Somewhat load dependent
No geometric assumption
Tissue Doppler Apical views
Objective data
Less dependent on image quality
Less dependent on reader expertise
Somewhat load dependent
Requires parallel angle of insonation
Affected by translation, tethering, and respiration
2D speckle tracking Longitudinal Strain
Not affected by Doppler angle
Requires high frame rate
Requires good 2D image resolution
Decreased feasibility versus TDI
Radial Strain
Not affected by Doppler angle
 

Key Points

The most commonly used 2D measurement for volume estimations is the biplane method of disks (modified Simpson’s rule; Figures 1-4 and 1-5). Left-sided contrast agents used for endocardial border delineation are helpful and improve measurement reproducibility for suboptimal studies and correlation with other imaging techniques (Figure 1-6). These agents also help improve diagnosis of left ventricular thrombus (Figure 1-7).

Segmental Wall Motion

Key Points

LV Function Assessment by 2D Speckle Tracking (Figure 1-10)

image

Figure 1-10 Apical 4-chamber (A), 2-chamber (B), and 3-chamber (C) 2D strain maps and segmental strain scores along with bull’s-eye map (D) showing global strain (GS) and segmental strain values in the same patient as in Figure 1-8. Note reduced segmental strain values of −6 to −13% in the basal to midinferior and inferolateral segments consistent with transmural infarction. GS is mildly reduced at −16%. AVC, aortic valve closure.

Left Ventricular Diastolic Function

Mitral Inflow PW Doppler

Key Points

Assessment of Left Atrium

Assessment of Linear Dimensions

An increase in atrial size most commonly is related to increased wall tension as a result of increased filling pressure.

Noninvasive Assessment of Left Atrial and Left Ventricular Filling Pressures

Diagnostic evidence of diastolic LV dysfunction can be obtained invasively (LV end-diastolic pressure [LVEDP] > 16 mm Hg or mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure > 12 mm Hg) or noninvasively by TDI (E/E′ > 15). Multiple other parameters, including the mitral inflow E/A ratio, its reduction with the Valsalva maneuver, E-wave deceleration time, the pulmonary vein S/D ratio, the pulmonary vein D-wave DT, mitral inflow and pulmonary vein inflow duration, and E/velocity of propagation, can be used for assessing left atrial pressure (Table 1-2).

TABLE 1-2 ASSESSMENT OF CARDIAC FILLING PRESSURES

Mitral regurgitation To evaluate LA filling pressure [SBP − 4(MR velocity)2]
Tricuspid regurgitation To evaluate pulmonary artery systolic pressure [4 × (tricuspid insufficiency jet velocity)2 (m/s)]
Pulmonary regurgitation Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure [4 × (pulmonary insufficiency jet velocity)2 (m/s)] plus right atrial pressure
Left atrial pressure Mitral inflow E-wave DT < 160 ms
Mitral inflow E/A > 2.0
Pulmonary vein S < pulmonary vein D
Pulmonary vein adur 30 ms > mitral inflow adur
Mitral inflow E/A > 0.5 with Valsalva maneuver
E/E′ > 15
E/Vp > 2.0
Pulmonary vein D wave DT < 160 ms

adur, atrial wave velocity duration; D, diastolic wave; E, mitral inflow early-filling wave; E/A, mitral inflow early-to-late diastolic velocity ratio; E/E′, ratio of mitral inflow early filling wave to myocardial early diastolic velocity; E/Vp, ratio of mitral inflow early-filling wave to early propagation velocity by color M-mode; S, systolic wave; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

To evaluate dP/dt: Σ Δt from 1 m/s to 3 m/s, 32/Δt

If TDI yields an E/E′ ratio suggestive of diastolic LV dysfunction (15 > E/E′ > 8), additional noninvasive investigations are required for diagnostic evidence of diastolic LV dysfunction. These can consist of blood flow Doppler of the mitral valve or pulmonary veins, echocardiographic measures of LV mass index or left atrial volume index, electrocardiographic evidence of atrial fibrillation, or plasma levels of natriuretic peptides. If plasma levels of natriuretic peptides are elevated, diagnostic evidence of diastolic LV dysfunction also requires additional noninvasive investigations such as TDI, blood flow Doppler of the mitral valve or pulmonary veins, echocardiographic measures of LV mass index or left atrial volume index, or electrocardiographic evidence of atrial fibrillation.

Right Ventricular Systolic Function

Given the complex geometry of the RV and the lack of standard methods for assessing RV volumes, RV systolic function is generally estimated qualitatively in clinical practice. Nevertheless, a number of echocardiographic techniques may be used to assess RV function. These are listed in Table 1-3.

TABLE 1-3 ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION

Measurement Location Normal Values
TAPSE
M-mode apical 4-chamber view
Tricuspid annulus ≥16 mm
Peak tricuspid valve (TV) annular velocity in systole (Sa)
TDI apical 4-chamber view
Systole at lateral and medial TV annulus ≥10 cm/s
Fractional area change (FAC)
2D—apical 4-chamber view
FAC = (EDA − ESA)/EDA >35%
Isovolumic acceleration (IVA)
Tissue Doppler—lateral tricuspid annulus
IVA = TV peak isovolumic annular velocity/time to peak velocity 2.2 m/s2
RV dP/dt Tricuspid regurgitant jet by CW Doppler—time for the TR velocity to increase from 0.5 m/s to 2 m/s
ΔP = (4V22 − 4V12)
= 15/Δt
>400 mm Hg/s
Myocardial performance index (MPI)
PW Doppler RV inflow and outflow
MPI = (time interval of TV closure − ET)/ET ≤0.4

EDA, end-diastolic area; ESA, end-systolic area.

Assessment of Filling Pressure by Continuous Wave (CW) Doppler Signals (Table 1-4)

Assessment of Left Atrial Pressure

LA systolic pressure can be obtained by subtracting the peak systolic LV-LA gradient, calculated from the peak MR velocity (4V2), from the systolic blood pressure, assuming there is no aortic stenosis or subclavian stenosis (Figure 1-30).

TABLE 1-4 ASSESSMENT OF CARDIAC FILLING PRESSURES

LA pressure LV systolic pressure − LV-LA systolic gradient
SBP − 4(peak mitral regurgitation jet velocity)2 (m/s)
Peak PA pressure RV systolic pressure + right atrial pressure
[4 × (tricuspid insufficiency jet velocity)2 (m/s)] + RA pressure
End-diastolic PA pressure PA-RV late diastolic pressure gradient + RV diastolic pressure
[4 × (late pulmonary insufficiency jet velocity)2 (m/s)] + RA pressure
Mean PA pressure PA-RV early diastolic pressure gradient + RV diastolic pressure
[4 × (early pulmonary insufficiency jet velocity)2 (m/s)] + RA pressure
LV end-diastolic pressure Aortic diastolic pressure − end-diastolic aortic-LV pressure gradient
Diastolic blood pressure − [4 × (late aortic insufficiency jet velocity)2 (m/s)]

Assessment of Right Ventricular and Right Atrial Pressures

The RV-RA gradient can be obtained from the peak tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity (4V2) from the TR signal (Figure 1-32; see also Figures 1-19 and 1-29). Peak RV systolic pressure (peak pulmonary artery pressure [PAP] in the absence of pulmonic valve stenosis) can be estimated by adding right atrial pressure to the RV-RA gradient. RA systolic pressure is estimated from the size and respiratory variability of the inferior vena cava (IVC) (Table 1-5).

TABLE 1-5 ASSESSMENT OF RIGHT ATRIAL PRESSURE

IVC Diameter Collapsibility Index Estimated RA Pressure
≤2.1 cm (normal) >50% (normal) 3 mm Hg (normal)
>2.1 cm (dilated) >50% (normal) 8 mm Hg (mildly elevated)
>2.1 cm <50% 15 mm Hg
>2.1 cm None >15 mm Hg

Assessment of Right Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure

The RV–pulmonary artery (PA) end-diastolic pressure gradient can be calculated from the end pulmonary insufficiency (PI) velocity as 4V2 (Figure 1-33). RA pressure is then added to this gradient to obtain RV end-diastolic pressure.

RA pressure is estimated from the IVC (see Table 1-5; see also Figure 1-19) and TR jet shape (Figure 1-34).

Summary of Echocardiographic Findings

Echocardiographic findings in systolic and diastolic heart failure are summarized in Tables 1-6 and 1-7.

TABLE 1-6 TWO-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS IN SYSTOLIC AND DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE

Echo Parameter Systolic Heart Failure Diastolic Heart Failure
LV size Dilated Normal
Wall thickness Normal or increased Usually increased
LV mass Significantly increased Normal to severely increased
LVEF Moderate to severly reduced Preserved
LV trabeculation Often increased Normal
LV thrombus May be present Absent
Atrial size Usually enlarged Enlarged disproportionate to LV size
Right ventricular size Often enlarged Normal to mildly enlarged
Right ventricular systolic function Often reduced Usually normal
Inferior vena cava Normal to dilated Dilated with reduced respiratory variation
Hepatic veins Variable Often dilated
Pleural effusion Often present Often absent
Pericardial effusion Usually absent Usually absent
Atrial fibrillation May be present Often present

TABLE 1-7 DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS IN SYSTOLIC AND DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE

Echo Parameter Systolic Heart Failure Diastolic Heart Failure
Mitral regurgitation None to severe None to moderate
Diastolic MR May be present May be present
Often due to first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) Often due to elevated LVEDP
MR peak velocity Often reduced Normal to elevated
MR dP/dt Reduced Often normal
Tricuspid regurgitation None to severe None to moderate
Often due to first-degree AVB Often due to elevated LVEDP
Diastolic TR May be present May be present
Pulmonary artery pressure Elevated proportionate to LV systolic dysfunction and/or MR Elevated disproportionate to LV systolic dysfunction and/or MR
Mitral inflow Grade I–IV diastolic dysfunction Often grade II–IV diastolic dysfunction
Grade often concordant to LV systolic function Grade often disconcordant to LV systolic function
Color M-mode Propagation velocity (Vp) variable Vp usually <45 cm/s and E/Vp > 1.5
Tricuspid inflow Variable Often restrictive filling
Pulmonary vein (PV) pattern Grade I–IV Often grade III–IV
May show systolic reversal with severe MR Diastolic dominant pattern prominent atrial reversal with PV adur > mitral inflow adur
TDI E′ Often reduced Often reduced
Septal annulus TDI S′ Markedly reduced Mildly reduced
Mitral annulus Dilated Normal to moderately dilated
Tricuspid annulus Dilated Normal to moderately dilated
Tricuspid annulus TDI S′ reduced S′ often normal
Hepatic veins Variable S/D ratio <0.5, prominent atrial and ventricular reversal with inspiration and expiration

Infiltrative Cardiomyopathy

While abnormalities in systolic function can be detected by TDI and speckle tracking, infiltrative cardiomyopathy manifests as a pure form of diastolic dysfunction on a conventional echocardiogram and initially presents as isolated diastolic heart failure (Figures 1-35 through 1-37).

Challenges in Assessment of Diastolic Function

Tachycardia makes evaluation of diastolic function difficult. Pulmonary vein flow may be most helpful in this setting (Figures 1-39 and 1-40). In the presence of a prosthetic mitral valve, mitral stenosis, or significant mitral annular calcification, pulmonary vein flow is most reliable in assessing diastolic function.

Atrial fibrillation is another common condition that makes assessment of diastolic function difficult due to a loss of mechanical atrial function and highly variable cycle length. In chronic atrial fibrillation, it is difficult to separate the effects of the progression of diastolic dysfunction from further atrial remodeling related to atrial fibrillation itself. Pulmonary vein flow shows S-wave blunting and hence the S/D ratio is not very helpful. Mitral inflow E-wave DT, E/E′, and pulmonary wave DT assist with evaluation of diastolic function and left atrial pressure (Figure 1-41).

Significant mitral regurgitation causes S-wave blunting. In addition, increased forward flow increases the E wave. Hence assessment of diastolic function in the presence of significant MR remains challenging.