Disorders of the Esophagus

Published on 06/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2859 times

107 Disorders of the Esophagus

The esophagus is a muscular tube connecting the pharynx and the stomach. Its role is to move material from the mouth to the stomach. It does not produce any digestive enzymes and has no active role in digestion. Disorders of the esophagus can present with chest or abdominal pain, difficulty swallowing, abnormal movement of gastric contents, or gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Disorders involving the esophagus include developmental anomalies, motility disorders, gastroesophageal reflux (GER), esophagitis, and traumatic injury.

Developmental Anomalies

Congenital disorders of the esophagus occur in approximately 1 in 3000 to 5000 births. These disorders commonly occur during embryogenesis as the trachea separates from the esophagus, and include atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), esophageal stenosis, esophageal duplication, esophageal webs and rings, esophageal diverticulum, and esophageal or bronchogenic cysts.

Motility Disorders of The Esophagus

The esophagus relies on a coordinated motility effort to drive food forward into the stomach and to clear acidic and bilious secretions that may leak upward from the stomach. If a motility disorder disturbs this muscular endeavor, proper delivery of food and clearance of gastroesophageal fluids cannot occur.

Etiology and Pathogenesis

Striated muscle makes up the upper esophageal sphincter along with the proximal one-third of the esophagus. Smooth muscle composes the remaining two-thirds. The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is a physiologic sphincter. There is a rich nerve supply to the esophagus. Motility problems can arise from muscular disorders (polymyositis, dermatomyositis, muscular dystrophy, myasthenia gravis), neurologic disorders (stroke, multiple sclerosis, lead poisoning), systemic illness (lupus, scleroderma, sarcoidosis, thyroid disease, diabetes), or infection (tetanus, botulism, Trypanosoma cruzi infection).

Evaluation

The diagnosis of GERD can most often be made clinically with a thorough medical and dietary history and a physical examination. Diagnostic studies should be reserved for those with atypical or concerning symptoms (Box 107-1), symptoms unresponsive to therapy, or symptoms suggestive of anatomic abnormality or tissue damage (hematemesis, bloody stool, anemia). An upper GI study with barium swallow is used to demonstrate anatomic anomalies. Scintigraphy (also known as milk scan or gastric emptying study) can show delayed gastric emptying. Upper endoscopy assesses for mucosal injury, inflammation, or dysplasia and may distinguish GERD from eosinophilic esophagitis. Esophageal pH monitoring is helpful to evaluate the frequency of acid reflux events, and multichannel intraluminal impedance studies can demonstrate non–acid reflux events. These measurements are also correlated with symptoms to help establish or refute the relationship between clinical symptoms and GERD.

Management

The goals of treatment of GERD are to reduce symptoms; heal esophageal mucosal injury; and prevent complications, including esophagitis, Barrett’s esophagus (metaplasia of the lower esophagus), and stricture formation (Figure 107-3). In infants with GER who are not bothered by emesis and who are growing appropriately, no therapy is necessary. Initial therapy for symptomatic infants with GERD is lifestyle modification, including thickening of feeds, giving smaller volume frequent feeds, frequent burping, and maintaining upright position for longer duration after feeds. Pharmacologic therapy for GERD includes antacids to buffer existing acid and H2 receptor antagonists (e.g., ranitidine) or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; e.g., omeprazole) to decrease secretion of acid from parietal cells. PPIs have been shown to be the most effective pharmacologic therapy for GERD. However, they are not always necessary and may be associated with adverse effects such as an increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia and acute gastroenteritis. Prokinetic use (e.g., metoclopramide) has declined because of unfavorable side effect profiles. Surgical fundoplication, a procedure in which the fundus is wrapped around the distal esophagus, is an option for children who are unresponsive to pharmacologic treatment and for those who develop respiratory compromise or stricture. Side effects of fundoplication are not inconsequential and include bloating, dysphagia, dumping syndrome, hernia, small bowel obstruction, and recurrence requiring a second fundoplication.

Etiology and Pathogenesis

Evaluation

Endoscopy with biopsy is the main diagnostic modality for esophagitis. Macroscopic visualization of the esophagus may reveal erythema, erosions, or ulcerations; however, a normal macroscopic appearance of the esophagus does not exclude histologic esophagitis. Histology, electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry can help distinguish the different causes of esophagitis (Table 107-1).

Table 107-1 Characteristic Histological Findings for Various Causes of Esophagitis

Finding Etiology
Eosinophils  
<20/hpf
>20/hpf
Primary GER
Idiopathic EoE
Macroscopic shallow ulcers
Mononuclear infiltrate
Multinucleate giant cells
Herpes simplex esophagitis
Basophilic nuclear inclusions Cytomegalovirus esophagitis
Macroscopic white plaques
Pseudohyphae and budding yeast
Candidal esophagitis
Polymorphonuclear infiltrate, vessel thrombosis, granulation tissue Corrosive esophagitis

EoE, eosinophilic esophagitis; GER, gastroesophageal reflux; hpf, high-power field.

Traumatic Injuries to the Esophagus

Traumatic injury to the esophagus during childhood may occur as a result of ingestion of caustic substances or foreign bodies, blunt or penetrating injury, medical procedures, or child abuse.

Esophageal Foreign Body

Foreign bodies are most frequently ingested by children younger than the age of 3 years and by children with neurologic disease or developmental delay. Whereas young children most frequently ingest coins, toy parts, and jewelry, older children and adolescents more frequently choke on food particles. These items may become lodged in the esophagus at the thoracic inlet, the level of the aortic arch, or the gastroesophageal junction. Food impaction should raise suspicion for anatomic abnormality, including stricture or vascular ring. With impaction, children may be asymptomatic or may experience dysphagia, odynophagia, drooling, wheezing, or hoarseness. A high index of suspicion is necessary. Chest radiograph may identify radiopaque, but not radiolucent, objects that may be seen using computed tomography. Esophagoscopy is often the primary diagnostic tool when suspicion is high but imaging is inconclusive. Endoscopic removal is often necessary and can also evaluate the esophagus after removal of the foreign body. Timing of endoscopic removal is based on the presence or absence of symptoms, the type and location of the suspected object, and the duration since ingestion. In general, patients who have ingested button batteries or sharp objects, as well as symptomatic patients with any object type, should undergo emergent removal. Asymptomatic patients with ingestion of noncaustic, blunt objects can be observed for 12 to 24 hours to allow for spontaneous passage. Most objects retained after 24 hours should be removed endoscopically. In general, after the object passes into the stomach, endoscopic removal is not necessary unless symptoms develop, the object is large (longer than 5 cm or wider than 2 cm), or multiple magnets were ingested. After they are in the stomach, most objects will pass uneventfully through the entire GI tract within 2 to 3 weeks. Monitoring the stool and, if necessary, follow-up imaging, can document complete passage of the object.