Decreasing the Risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Female Athletes

Published on 16/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2872 times

Chapter 19 Decreasing the Risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Female Athletes

SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE AND SUPPORTING INVESTIGATIONS FOR SPORTSMETRICS NEUROMUSCULAR RETRAINING PROGRAM

The purpose of this chapter is to present the scientific rationale, supporting data, and specific strategies for the implementation of a neuromuscular knee ligament injury prevention–training program, Sportsmetrics. Although many knee ligament injury prevention–training programs have been published,* few have presented scientific justification that the training effectively improved neuromuscular deficiencies and reduced the incidence of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in female athletes (Table 19-1). Some programs had small sample sizes and were thus underpowered to avoid the potential for a type II statistical error.7,11,28,29,33,35 Most studies were not randomized, and several did not contain a control group studied concurrently with a trained group. Although some investigations cited a reduction in noncontact ACL injury rates, others failed to find a statistically significant effect.11,28,29,3335Some programs have been published even though the investigators did not follow athletes over a season or a period of time to determine whether a reduction in ACL injuries occurred as a result of preventive training. 14,16,21

The Sportsmetrics program is effective in inducing changes in neuromuscular indices in female athletes, because studies have shown improved overall lower limb alignment on a drop-jump test,24 increased hamstrings strength, 13,24,36 increased knee flexion angles on landing,13,31 and reduced deleterious abduction/adduction moments and ground reaction forces.13 Sportsmetrics also significantly reduces the risk of noncontact ACL injuries in female athletes participating in basketball, soccer, and volleyball.12

A pilot laboratory study was conducted at the authors’ institution using 11 high school female volleyball players to determine the effect of Sportsmetrics training on landing mechanics and lower extremity strength.13 The mean age of the female subjects was 15 ± 0.6 years, and they had participated in organized volleyball for an average of 2 ± 1 years before the study was initiated. A control group of 9 male subjects was selected and matched to the females according to height, weight, and age. The Sportsmetrics training program, described in detail later in this chapter, was performed 3 times a week (2-hr sessions) for 6 weeks. The athletes were taken through a series of tests before and after the training program. These tests included isokinetic muscle testing at 360°/sec and force analysis testing with a two-camera, video-based, optoelectronic digitizer for measuring motion and a multicomponent force plate for measuring ground reaction force. The subjects performed 10 jumps on the force plate that simulated volleyball jumping and landing maneuvers.

After 6 weeks of training, peak landing forces from a volleyball block jump decreased 22% (P = .006), or an average of 456N (103lb); all but 1 of the female subjects demonstrated a decrease in these forces (Fig. 19-1). Knee adduction and abduction moments, which induce a lateral or medial torque to the knee joint, decreased approximately 50% (Fig. 19-2). These moments were significant predictors of peak landing forces. The importance of this finding is that decreased abduction or abduction moments may lessen the risk of lift-off of the medial or lateral femoral condyle, improve tibiofemoral contact stabilizing forces,20 and reduce the risk of knee ligament injury.

image

FIGURE 19-1 Bar graph shows decrease in peak landing forces with training in female subjects before and after training and relative to age- and weight-matched athletic male subjects. *P < .01.

(From Hewett, T. E.; Stroupe, A. L.; Nance, T. A.; Noyes, F. R.: Plyometric training in female athletes. Decreased impact forces and increased hamstring torques. Am J Sports Med 24:765–773, 1996.)

image

FIGURE 19-2 Bar graph shows peak knee adduction and abduction moment data at landing before and after training. The female subjects were grouped according to the dominant moment (adduction or abduction) and all the female subjects grouped together (all). *P < .05 compared with untrained females.

(From Hewett, T. E.; Stroupe, A. L.; Nance, T. A.; Noyes, F. R.: Plyometric training in female athletes. Decreased impact forces and increased hamstring torques. Am J Sports Med 24:765–773, 1996.)

Female athletes demonstrated lower landing forces than male athletes, and lower adduction and abduction moments after training compared with pretraining values. External knee extension moments (which are balanced by an internal flexion, hamstring muscle) of male athletes were three times higher than those of female athletes. The training did not significantly alter these extension moments.

After training, hamstring-to-quadriceps muscle peak torque ratios increased 26% on the nondominant side and 13% on the dominant side, correcting side-to-side imbalances in the female athletes. In addition, hamstring muscle power increased 44% on the dominant side and 21% on the nondominant side. Whereas peak torque ratios of male athletes were significantly greater than those of the female athletes before training, the ratios were similar between genders after training.

A second study was conducted in a group of 62 high school female athletes to determine whether Sportsmetrics training altered lower limb alignment on a drop-jump task and isokinetic lower limb muscle strength.24 This investigation is described in detail in Chapter 16, Lower Limb Neuromuscular Control and Strength in Prepubescent and Adolescent Male and Female Athletes. Before training, 80% of the female athletes had a valgus overall lower limb alignment on landing from a drop-jump. After training, 34% of the females demonstrated this alignment (P < .0001). Significant increases were also noted after training in knee flexion peak torque in both the dominant and the nondominant limbs (P < .0001).

In order to determine whether Sportsmetrics training reduced the incidence of noncontact ACL injuries in female athletes, a controlled, prospective investigation was conducted in 1263 high school athletes.12 One group of 366 females underwent 6 weeks of Sportsmetrics training and a second group of 463 females was not trained. Included in the study was a group of 434 untrained male athletes. All athletes were followed throughout a single soccer, volleyball, or basketball season. Weekly reports submitted by athletic trainers included the number of practice and competition exposures and mechanism of injury. All ACL injuries were confirmed by arthroscopy, and medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries were confirmed by manual valgus testing.

The total number of athlete-exposures were 23,138 for the untrained group, 17,222 for the trained group, and 21,390 for the male control group. There were 14 serious knee ligament injuries, which were sustained in 10 of 463 untrained female athletes (8 noncontact), 2 of 366 trained female athletes (0 noncontact), and 2 of 434 male athletes (1 noncontact). The knee injury incidence per 1000 athlete-exposures was 0.43 in untrained female athletes, 0.12 in trained female athletes, and 0.09 in male athletes (P = .02, chi-square analysis). Untrained female athletes had a 3.6 times higher incidence of knee injury than trained female athletes (P = .05) and 4.8 times higher than male athletes (P = .03). The incidence of knee injury in trained female athletes was not significantly different from that in untrained male athletes (Fig. 19-3; P = .86).

image

FIGURE 19-3 Serious knee injuries per 1000 player-exposures in soccer and basketball players.

(From Hewett, T. E.; Stroupe, A. L.; Nance, T. A.; Noyes, F. R.: Plyometric training in female athletes. Decreased impact forces and increased hamstring torques. Am J Sports Med 24:765–773, 1996.)

The risk factors that have been hypothesized to increase the potential for an ACL injury are discussed in Chapter 15, Risk Factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in the Female Athlete. The final position of the knee joint on landing, pivoting, and cutting is influenced by the center of gravity of the upper body and the trunk over the lower extremity. Equally important are trunk-hip adduction or abduction, foot-ankle pronation-supination, and foot separation distance. These effects add together to produce either a varus or a valgus moment about the knee joint that must be balanced by the lower limb musculature. If the athlete is off-balance, or contacts another player, a loss of trunk and lower limb control and position may occur and the knee joint may go into a hyperextended or valgus position. Although there are many potential mechanisms for ACL injury, it has been postulated that excessive valgus moments about the knee joint with subsequent high anterior tibial shear forces may be one of the most common to occur in females.8,15,18 Excessive valgus loading may result in decreased tibiofemoral contact, or condylar lift-off,20 and a reduction in the normal joint contact geometry that contributes to knee joint stability. This position, coupled with a highly activated quadriceps muscle that produces maximum anterior shear forces with the knee joint at low flexion angles (0°–30°),5,10,26 and a relatively inactive hamstrings musculature, could potentially lead to ACL rupture. The function of the hamstrings is dependent on the angle of knee flexion and degrees of external tibial rotation.25 The mechanical advantage of these muscles increases as the knee is flexed. At 0° of extension, the flexion force is only 49% of that generated at 90° of flexion. Withrow and coworkers37 measured the relative strain in the anteromedial region of the ACL in cadaver knees during a simulated jump landing maneuver. Increased hamstring muscle forces during the knee flexion phase significantly reduced the peak relative strain in the ACL by greater than 70% compared with the baseline condition (P = .005). The authors concluded that it may be possible to limit ACL strain by accentuating hip flexion during knee flexion phase of jump landings because this increases the tension in the active hamstring muscles.

The time in which an ACL rupture occurs was recently estimated to range from 17 to 50 msec after initial ground contact.17 It is evident that there is not enough time for an athlete, upon sensing a knee injury about to occur, to alter the body or lower extremity position to prevent the injury. In order to have a significant impact on reducing the incident rate of this injury, a training program must teach athletes to control the upper body, trunk, and lower body position; lower the center of gravity by increasing hip and knee flexion during activities; and develop muscular strength and techniques to land with decreased ground reaction forces. In addition, athletes should be taught to pre-position the body and lower extremity prior to initial ground contact in order to obtain the position of greatest knee joint stability and stiffness. The program should consist of a dynamic warm-up, plyometric jump training, strengthening exercises, aerobic conditioning, agility, and risk awareness training.9

SPORTS INJURY TEST

The authors developed a sports injury test (SIT) in order to obtain a profile of each athlete before and after Sportsmetrics training. The SIT measures (1) knee and ankle position on landing and take-off from a drop-jump during a video test (described in detail in Chapter 16, Lower Limb Neuromuscular Control and Strength in Prepubescent and Adolescent Male and Female Athletes), (2) lower limb symmetry1,23 and a general assessment of lower limb control on single-leg hop tasks (Fig. 19-4), (3) isokinetic lower extremity muscle strength, (4) hamstring flexibility, and (5) vertical jump height. Athletes participating in sports-specific Sportsmetrics training programs, discussed later in this chapter, also undergo a 10-yard dash, a 20-yard dash, a T-drill run, and a 1-mile run. A history is collected for each athlete regarding prior injuries to the knees and ankles. The SIT is completed just prior to the initiation of training and within 1 week of completion of training.

SPORTSMETRICS NEUROMUSCULAR TRAINING PROGRAM COMPONENTS

The essential elements of the Sportsmetrics neuromuscular training program are a dynamic warm-up, plyometric jump training, strengthening, and flexibility. It is recommended that this training program be conducted either during the off-season or just prior to the beginning of the athlete’s sport season. The training is conducted 3 times a week on alternating days for 6 weeks.

As is described later, sports-specific speed and agility components may be incorporated into the training program if desired by an athlete or team. Sports-specific programs have been developed for soccer (Sportsmetrics Soccer), basketball (Sportsmetrics Basketball), and tennis (Sportsmetrics Tennis) players. A maintenance-training program (Sportsmetrics Warm-up for Injury Prevention and Performance [WIPP]) may be performed upon completion of the 6 weeks of formal Sportsmetrics to continue to instill the skills and techniques learned during the athlete’s sports season. For athletes who have already suffered an injury or had ACL reconstruction, Sportsmetrics Return to Play is recommended as end-stage rehabilitation training.

Training may be accomplished either in classes led by an instructor who has completed certification training from the authors’ foundation or from an instructional step-by-step videotape series. Athletes who do not train with a certified instructor are encouraged to perform the training either in front of a mirror or with a partner so that mistakes in technique, form, and body alignment may be detected and corrected. A list of certified instructors and sites is available at http://www.sportsmetrics.net.

Dynamic Warm-up

The purpose of the dynamic warm-up is to prepare the body for activity with functional-based activities that incorporate sports-specific motions. The goals are to raise core body temperature; increase heart rate; increase blood flow to the muscles; and improve flexibility, balance, and coordination. Upon completion of this warm-up, the athlete will be physically prepared for training. All of the exercises should be performed across the width of a court or field or for approximately 20 to 30 seconds.

4 Leg cradle (Fig. 19-5). The athlete walks forward, keeping the entire body straight and neutrally aligned. One leg is lifted in front of the body, bending at the knee. The knee is rotated outward and the foot inward. The foot is held with both hands, standing on one leg, and held in this position for 3 seconds. The foot is placed back down and the exercise is repeated with the opposite leg.
5 Dog and bush (hip rotator) walk (Fig. 19-6). The athlete is instructed to pretend that there is an obstacle directly in front of her or him. The athlete faces forward and keeps the shoulders and hips square. One leg is extended at the hip and the knee kept softly bent. The leg is externally rotated out at the hip and the knee is bent to approximately 90°. The leg is rotated and brought up and over the obstacle and then placed back on the ground. The exercise is repeated with the opposite leg.

Plyometrics/Jump Training

In reference to ACL injury prevention–training programs, Griffin and associates9 stated, “The rationale to include plyometric exercises is based on evidence that the stretch-shortening cycle activates neural, muscular, and elastic components and, therefore, should enhance joint stability (dynamic stiffening).” Plyometrics help develop muscle control and strength considered critical to reduce the risk of knee ligament injuries. These exercises are well known to increase muscular power, vertical jump height, acceleration speed, and running speed.3,4,32 However, if done improperly, these exercises would not be expected to have a beneficial effect in reducing the risk of a noncontact ACL injury. Therefore, the philosophy of the plyometric and jump-training component in the Sportsmetrics program is to place a major emphasis on correct jumping and techniques throughout the 6 weeks of training. Specific drills and instruction are used to teach the athlete to pre-position the entire body safely when accelerating or decelerating on landing. The selection and progression of the exercises entail neuromuscular retraining and proceed from simple jumping drills (to instill correct form) to multidirectional, single-foot hops and plyometrics with an emphasis on quick turnover (to add movements that mimic sports-specific motions). The jump training is divided into three 2-week phases. Each 2-week phase has a different training focus and the exercises change correspondingly (Table 19-2).

Phase 1, termed the technique development phase, aims to teach the athlete proper form and technique for eight different jumps. Four basic techniques are stressed: correct posture and body alignment throughout the jump (spine erect, shoulders back, chest over knees), jumping straight up with no excessive side-to-side or forward-backward movement, soft landings including toe-to-midfoot rocking and bent knees, and instant recoil preparation for the next jump. The athletes are taught these techniques through verbal queues from instructors such as “on your toes,” “straight as an arrow,” “light as a feather,” “shock absorber,” and “recoil like a spring.” Constant feedback is offered by instructors, and mirrors are used in the training sessions to provide direct visual feedback as frequently as possible. Throughout each session, exercises are increased by duration or repetition. If the athlete becomes fatigued and cannot perform the jumps with the proper technique, she or he is encouraged to stop and rest. Approximately 30 seconds of recovery time is allowed between each exercise.

Phase 2, called the fundamentals phase, continues to emphasize proper technique and quality jumping form. Six jumps from phase 1 are continued, but these are performed for longer periods of time. In addition, three new jumps of increased difficulty are incorporated. Phase 3, the performance phase, increases the quantity and speed of the jumps to develop a truly plyometric exercise routine. The athlete is encouraged to complete as many jumps as possible with proper form and to concentrate on the height achieved in each jump.

1 Wall jump (wk 1–6). Also known as ankle bounces, this jump is performed with the knees slightly bent and both arms raised overhead (Fig. 19-7A). From this position, the athlete bounces up and down off his or her toes (see Fig. 19-7B). The knees should be soft and the hips, knees, and ankles in neutral alignment. This jump is performed first to prepare the athlete mentally and physically for plyometric training. This also provides the trainer an opportunity to observe and begin positive feedback and instruction.

Mistakes to correct include slouched posture, too much knee flexion, and eyes watching the feet with the head down. The athlete should be told to keep the eyes and head focused up, bend the knees slightly, and maintain neutral alignment.

Strength Training

A combination of strength-training options is used to focus on the development of core strength and the improvement of overall muscular efficiency. Either isokinetic equipment or free weights may be used by the athlete, based on the available equipment. The lower extremity muscle groups targeted are the quadriceps, hamstrings, gluteals, and gastrocnemius. The athlete begins with 12 to 15 repetitions for each muscle group. When the athlete can perform 15 repetitions, the amount of weight is increased. The upper body muscle groups include the deltoids, pectorals, triceps, latissimus dorsi/low back, and abdominals. Ten to 12 repetitions are recommended initially, and when the athlete can perform 12 repetitions, the amount of weight is increased. Athletes are encouraged to use 70% of their 1 repetition maximum upon initiation of strength training. The overload principle is stressed.

For athletes who do not have access to isokinetic equipment or free weights, exercises for strength training using body weights and a Theraband may be used, as described later.

1 Mini-squats with Theraband. The athlete stands on the center of a strip of TheraBand with the feet shoulder-width apart (Fig. 19-21A). While gripping each end of the band, the athlete pulls both hands up to waist level to make the band taut. The athlete squats down into a modified 70° bend at the hips and knees, lowering the body against the resistance of the band (see Fig. 19-21B). The knees are kept over the ankles. The athlete rises back up, pushing through the heels to the starting position. This exercise is done for 30 seconds during weeks 1 to 3 and for 60 seconds during weeks 4 to 6.

Mistakes to correct are body weight and/or knees shifting forward, slouched posture, and maintaining too much slack in the band. The athlete should be told to wiggle the toes throughout the movement, and to keep the back straight, the head up, and the knees centered over the ankles.

Flexibility

Passive stretching is done at the conclusion of training, with each stretch held for 20 to 30 seconds and repeated twice on each side. Stretching is considered essential to achieve maximum muscle length to allow muscles to work with power through a complete range of motion. The major muscle groups targeted are the hamstrings, iliotibial band, quadriceps, hip flexor, gastrocnemius, soleus, deltoid, triceps, biceps, pectoralis, and latissimus dorsi.

SPORTSMETRICS TRAINING PROGRAM OPTIONS

Sports-Specific Training

Sportsmetrics Soccer and Basketball

Soccer and basketball represent two of the highest-risk sports for noncontact ACL injuries in female athletes. Sports-specific training programs were designed for these activities that allow all training to be conducted on the field or court. These programs incorporate strength training, cardiovascular conditioning, and agility drills that mirror the typical demands of the sports. Seventeen of the jumps from Sportsmetrics are included in the training.

These programs should be performed in the athlete’s off or preparatory season at least 3 days/week. No equipment other than a basketball or soccer ball for each athlete is required. As in Sportsmetrics training, emphasis is placed on the athlete performing every exercise or drill with proper technique, body alignment, and form. If an athlete exhibits compromised form, the exercise should be stopped by the instructor. The athlete should then perform one more repetition of the task, focusing on correcting obvious deficiencies.

Sportsmetrics Soccer includes the components of Sportsmetrics in addition to agility drills and three different cardiovascular workouts that are both aerobic and anaerobic (Table 19-4). Each cardiovascular workout has a slightly different combination of short bursts of hard running and longer-distance/lower-intensity movements. The intensity of each running maneuver is monitored using a Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale from 1 to 10, with a rating of 1 indicating the lightest intensity and a rating of 10 designating an all-out maximum effort.

Sportsmetrics Basketball was designed to address fundamental strength, coordination, agility, and aerobic fitness (Table 19-5). The dynamic warm-up, jump/plyometric drills, and stretches are essentially the same as the original Sportsmetrics program with the addition of a basketball whenever possible to enhance balance, postural/body control, and trunk strength. The strength exercises are functional body weight exercises emphasizing total body conditioning. Agility drills and cardiovascular workouts, based upon basketball movement patterns and drills, round out the training.

Sportsmetrics Tennis

Although not considered a high-risk sport for noncontact ACL injuries, tennis carries the risk of other lower extremity injuries and overuse syndromes. A recent review of the literature regarding tennis injuries found that the lower extremity was the most common area injured.30 The concepts developed in traditional Sportsmetrics of decreased landing forces, increased knee and hip flexion angles during activity, improvement in balance and posture, and increased strength and agility may be effective in reducing the risk of other lower extremity injuries during tennis. Emphasis is placed on the athlete performing every exercise or drill with proper technique, body alignment, and form. The program incorporates strength training, cardiovascular conditioning, and skill/agility drills that match the demands of the sport (Table 19-6). Performed three times a week for 6 weeks, the training may be conducted during season or off-season. All training is performed on the court, and the authors recommend the use of clay courts if possible.

The foundation of the program duplicates traditional Sportsmetrics, because the athletes begin with dynamic warm-up exercises and jump training. The program strives to teach athletes to control the upper body, trunk, and lower body position; lower their center of gravity by increasing hip and knee flexion; and develop muscular strength and techniques to land with decreased ground reaction forces. In addition, athletes are taught to pre-position the body and lower extremity prior to initial ground contact in order to obtain the position of greatest knee joint stability and stiffness.

In addition to the jumps from the traditional Sportsmetrics program, the athletes perform level surface box (four-square) hops over barriers in a variety of patterns of increasing difficulty each week (Fig. 19-39). The patterns involve right-left, forward-backward, and diagonal directions to simulate the constant change of direction required during competitive tennis. While maintaining proper body position and knee flexion angles, the athletes are encouraged to perform as many hops as possible in 20 to 25 seconds.

After jump training, the players are taken through a series of rigorous speed, agility, footwork, and skill drills. The drills emphasize body posture, knee and hip flexion position, and balance techniques taught in the jump-training element of the program. Some of the tasks include use of a resistance belt during groundstroke and approach shot training, net zigzag that includes nine sharp cuts around cones placed between the baseline and the net, short sprints, and a cross-shadow drill which stresses balance and appropriate footwork along the baseline. In addition, muscle strengthening exercises include backward lunges, medicine ball tossing, single-leg toe-raises, wall-sits, seated press-ups, and wall push-ups. Athletes perform a variety of upper body free weight strength exercises. Free weights are added to the lunges and single-leg toe raises during the 3rd week of training to increase the difficulty of these tasks. A variety of abdominal exercises round out the program, starting with 100 repetitions the 1st week and working up to 250 repetitions the last week of training.

Sportsmetrics Speed and Conditioning Program

The Sportsmetrics Speed and Conditioning Program incorporates complex conditioning in addition to the other components of Sportsmetrics. The conditioning program encompasses a series of vigorous speed and agility drills comprising quick feet, sharp cuts, straight sprints, backward running, and unpredicted agility patterns (Table 19-7). With each drill, athletes concentrate on correct running form, body posture, and proper technique associated with cutting, pivoting, and decelerating. The entire program may be performed on a court or field with minimal equipment. It should be conducted in the athlete’s off or preparatory season, 3 days a week for 6 weeks. A few examples of the speed and agility training drills are listed later. The four-square hops shown in Figure 19-39 are included in the training (termed dot drill). This program is under prospective investigation to determine its effectiveness on both improving performance and reducing the rate of ACL noncontact injuries.

2 Ladder drill 1. A 15-foot ladder is placed along a sideline. The athlete begins at the left end of the ladder and steps the right foot forward and diagonally over the ladder into the first square followed quickly by the left foot (Fig. 19-40). As soon as the left foot crosses the ladder, the right foot steps backward and diagonally (back over the ladder), again followed quickly by the left foot. This pattern is continued along the 15-foot distance until the right end of the ladder is reached. Then, the same pattern is repeated leading with the left foot back to the starting point. The athlete should travel back and forth along the distance of the ladder for 30 seconds. The athlete should be told to keep the feet shoulder-width apart at all times; make all steps quick, short, and choppy; keep the knees slightly bent and relaxed; keep the back straight and the head up with eyes forward; and try not to land on any portion of the ladder.
3 Ladder drill 2. A 15-foot agility ladder is placed flat on the floor. The athlete begins the drill at the bottom of the ladder, with the feet outside of the first ladder “square” (Fig. 19-41). The right foot steps forward into the first ladder “square” followed quickly by the left foot. As soon as the left foot touches down in the ladder “square,” the right foot steps forward and laterally (to the outside right of the ladder) so that it is parallel to the ladder and in line with the ladder’s rung. Once the right foot touches down outside of the ladder, the left foot steps forward and laterally (to the outside left of the ladder) so that it is parallel to the ladder and in line with the rung. Once the left foot is down, the right foot steps forward and laterally into the next ladder “square,” followed immediately by the left foot. This pattern is continued along the length of the ladder in order to move in and out of each of the ladder “squares.” Upon reaching the end of the ladder, the same pattern described previously is followed, but the footwork moves backward in order to return to the starting position.

The athlete should be told to make all steps quick, short, and choppy; keep the knees slightly bent and relaxed; keep the back straight and head up with eyes forward; and try not to land on any portion of the ladder

4 T-drill. A T-shaped course is created with three cones and a start/finish marker as shown in Figure 19-42. The first cone is placed 30 feet in front of the start/finish marker. The other two cones are placed so that each is exactly 15 feet from (and in line with) the first cone. This forms a 30-foot line that is perpendicular to the line formed by the start/finish marker and the first cone. The athlete begins at the base of the “T” and sprints forward to the cone straight ahead. Upon reaching the cone, the athlete immediately shuffles left toward the cone to the left making sure that the feet do not cross at any point during the shuffle. The athlete taps the top of the cone. Then, the athlete shuffles right, making sure that the feet do not cross at any time. The athlete moves past the middle cone and shuffles to the cone located on the far right. The athlete taps the top of that cone and then shuffles left back toward the center cone. Once the center cone is reached, the athlete taps the top of the middle cone and immediately runs backward to the start/finish marker. Two repetitions of the course are completed, with at least 15 seconds rest between each repetition. A stopwatch is used to record the time of each repetition.

The athlete should be told to keep the head and neck straight, look straight ahead, keep the shoulders and hips square, do not round shoulders forward, make sure the back is straight, lean slightly forward for the duration of the activity, and make sure that the feet do not cross at any point during shuffle activities.

5 Beanbag game. A square course is created with flat markers placed on each corner of a 40- x 40-foot area on a gym floor (Fig. 19-43). Eight beanbags are placed in the center of the square. The athletes are divided into four groups (each group should contain the same number of athletes, if possible). Each group lines up behind one of the flat markers that will be their “home-base,” and faces the beanbags. On the command “GO,” one athlete from each team sprints to the center of the square and retrieves one of the beanbags for their team. Each athlete then sprints back to their home-base and places the beanbag on the flat marker so that the entire beanbag is on the marker. As soon as the beanbag is completely on the marker, the next team member leaves home-base and sprints to retrieve another beanbag. This teammate has the choice of going to the center of the square for a beanbag or running to the home-base of an opposing team to retrieve their beanbag. After retrieving each beanbag, the team member must return the beanbag to their home-base so that it is resting entirely on the marker before their next teammate can take off. The object of the game is for one team to get three beanbags resting on their home base, and yell “BEANBAG,” before anyone else. The first team to do this wins and receives a point. The game is played for 5 minutes in phase I, 7 minutes in phase II, and 9 minutes in phase III.
7 Shuttle sprints. Five cones are placed in a zigzag pattern within an 18- × 48-foot area (Fig. 19-44). Beginning to the left of the first cone, the athlete sprints across to the next cone in the pattern. Upon approaching the second cone, the athlete decelerates the sprint with choppy steps in order to allow for tapping the top of the cone once it is reached. As soon as the second cone is tapped, the athlete immediately accelerates across to the next cone and repeats the decelerate/tap/accelerate sequence until the last cone in the pattern is reached. Once the last cone is reached, the athlete rounds the cone and runs through the pattern again back to the start/finish line. One repetition involves running up and back the course. The athlete completes 2 repetitions with at least 15 seconds rest between each repetition. A stopwatch is used to time each repetition.

The athlete should be told to keep the head and neck straight, look straight ahead, keep the shoulders and hips square, do not round the shoulders forward, keep the back straight, lean slightly forward for the duration of the activity, decelerate each sprint with a bent knee, and stay tight to the cones throughout the activity.

8 Reaction agility drill 1. During this drill, the athlete reacts to verbal cues given by an instructor who stands on the baseline. The athlete starts in the center of the court with the back facing the instructor (Fig. 19-45) and runs backward toward the instructor. The instructor commands the athlete to turn left or right, upon which time the athlete shuffles left or right. The instructor then commands the athlete to run backward diagonally toward the closest sideline, then sprint straight forward. The final command instructs the athlete to go to the left, center, or right of the cones. The length of each command is based on the instructor and space available. The drill is performed twice with 30 seconds rest.

STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF NEUROMUSCULAR TRAINING

Educate Health Care Professionals to Conduct Formal Neuromuscular Training

In order to implement Sportsmetrics on a national basis, a formal course was devised to educate and certify health care professionals and coaches who wished to conduct training in their communities. The 13-hour formal course teaches (1) the theories of why female athletes have an increased incidence of serious knee ligament injuries compared with males, (2) the scientific basis of Sportsmetrics, (3) the necessity for neuromuscular training versus plyometric performance-enhancement training, (4) the verbal cues and methods required to teach the program to produce a change in landing mechanics and body positioning, (5) the differences between Sportsmetrics and other neuromuscular-training programs, (6) marketing strategies and ways to implement training in the community, (7) the necessity to conduct sports injury testing (see Chapter 16, Lower Limb Neuromuscular Control and Strength in Prepubescent and Adolescent Male and Female Athletes) and produce research data, and (8) for those involved in rehabilitation clinics, the implementation of Sportsmetrics as a component of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction.

Participants are given a detailed demonstration of every jump and spend a few hours practicing the jumps themselves and conducting mock instructions for the teaching staff. Each participant is taken through the sports injury test and given step-by-step instruction on the video drop-jump test (see Chapter 16, Lower Limb Neuromuscular Control and Strength in Prepubescent and Adolescent Male and Female Athletes). A formal written examination is conducted to ascertain that the participant has adequate knowledge of knee anatomy and strength training and plyometric concepts. A practical examination is done in which the participant trains a local athlete to demonstrate to our staff that he or she understands the correct verbal cues and training methodology to produce the desired result of proper body positioning and landing mechanics.

Problems Encountered and Suggested Solutions

In the authors’ experience, young athletes are easily convinced to participate in performance enhancement training. However, unless they or someone they know has gone through a serious knee ligament injury, they simply do not comprehend the consequences of such an injury. It takes considerable effort on the part of the health care professional to educate and motivate athletes to undergo 6 weeks of training (3 times/wk) to prevent an injury. In a similar manner, coaches are difficult to convince unless they have lost a number of athletes to ACL injuries. It appears that this problem is going to require further education of health care professionals; mission statements from national organizations such as the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the National Institutes of Health, and the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine; and continued media attention before widespread training and the benefits of an injury prevention program are realized.

Many high school athletes either participate in multiple sports or play their one particular sport yearround. This is especially true with soccer players, who in some communities never have an off-season. The integration of neuromuscular training into the schedules of these athletes is challenging. Solutions include incorporating Sportsmetrics training into an existing sports-specific training and conditioning program or to make the neuromuscular training itself sports-specific.

REFERENCES

1 Barber S.D., Noyes F.R., Mangine R.E., et al. Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knees. Clin Orthop. 1990;255:204-214.

2 Caraffa A., Cerulli G., Projetti M., et al. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer. A prospective controlled study of proprioceptive training. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4:19-21.

3 Chu D.A. Explosive power. In: Foran B., editor. High-Performance Sports Conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2001:83-98.

4 Delecluse C., Van Coppenolle H., Willems E., et al. Influence of high-resistance and high-velocity training on sprint performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27:1203-1209.

5 DeMorat G., Weinhold P., Blackburn T., et al. Aggressive quadriceps loading can induce noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:477-483.

6 Ettlinger C.F., Johnson R.J., Shealy J.E. A method to help reduce the risk of serious knee sprains incurred in alpine skiing. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:531-537.

7 Greenfield M.L., Kuhn J.E., Wojtys E.M. A statistics primer. Power analysis and sample size determination. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:138-140.

8 Griffin L.Y., et al. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:141-150.

9 Griffin L.Y., et al. Understanding and preventing noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a review of the Hunt Valley II meeting, January 2005. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1512-1532.

10 Grood E.S., Suntay W.J., Noyes F.R., Butler D.L. Biomechanics of the knee-extension exercise. Effect of cutting the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:725-734.

11 Heidt R.S.Jr., Sweeterman L.M., Carlonas R.L., et al. Avoidance of soccer injuries with preseason conditioning. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:659-662.

12 Hewett T.E., Lindenfeld T.N., Riccobene J.V., Noyes F.R. The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:699-706.

13 Hewett T.E., Stroupe A.L., Nance T.A., Noyes F.R. Plyometric training in female athletes. Decreased impact forces and increased hamstring torques. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:765-773.

14 Holm I., Fosdahl M.A., Friis A., et al. Effect of neuromuscular training on proprioception, balance, muscle strength, and lower limb function in female team handball players. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14:88-94.

15 Hutchinson M.R., Ireland M.L. Knee injuries in female athletes. Sports Med. 1995;19:288-302.

16 Irmischer B.S., Harris C., Pfeiffer R.P., et al. Effects of a knee ligament injury prevention exercise program on impact forces in women. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18:703-707.

17 Krosshaug T., Nakamae A., Boden B.P., et al. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury in basketball: video analysis of 39 cases. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:359-367.

18 Malinzak R.A., Colby S.M., Kirkendall D.T., et al. A comparison of knee joint motion patterns between men and women in selected athletic tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16:438-445.

19 Mandelbaum B.R., Silvers H.J., Watanabe D.S., et al. Effectiveness of a neuromuscular and proprioceptive training program in preventing anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1003-1010.

20 Markolf K.L., Burchfield D.M., Shapiro M.M., et al. Combined knee loading states that generate high anterior cruciate ligament forces. J Orthop Res. 1995;13:930-935.

21 Myer G.D., Ford K.R., McLean S.G., Hewett T.E. The effects of plyometric versus dynamic stabilization and balance training on lower extremity biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:445-455.

22 Myklebust G., Engebretsen L., Braekken I.H., et al. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13:71-78.

23 Noyes F.R., Barber S.D., Mangine R.E. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:513-518.

24 Noyes F.R., Barber-Westin S.D., Fleckenstein C., et al. The drop-jump screening test: difference in lower limb control by gender and effect of neuromuscular training in female athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:197-207.

25 Noyes F.R., Sonstegard D.A. Biomechanical function of the pes anserinus at the knee and the effect of its transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1225-1241.

26 O’Connor J.J. Can muscle co-contraction protect knee ligaments after injury or repair? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:41-48.

27 Olsen O.E., Myklebust G., Engebretsen L., et al. Exercises to prevent lower limb injuries in youth sports: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;330(7489):449.

28 Petersen W., et al. A controlled prospective case control study of a prevention training program in female team handball players: the German experience. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:614-621.

29 Pfeiffer R.P., Shea K.G., Roberts D., et al. Lack of effect of a knee ligament injury prevention program on the incidence of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1769-1774.

30 Pluim B.M., Staal J.B., Windler G.E., Jayanthi N. Tennis injuries: occurrence, aetiology, and prevention. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:415-423.

31 Prapavessis H., McNair P.J. Effects of instruction in jumping technique and experience jumping on ground reaction forces. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29:352-356.

32 Rimmer E., Sleivert G. Effects of a plyometric intervention program on sprint performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14:295-301.

33 Soderman K., Werner S., Pietila T., et al. Balance board training: prevention of traumatic injuries of the lower extremities in female soccer players? A prospective randomized intervention study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:356-363.

34 Wedderkopp N., Kaltoft M., Holm R., Froberg K. Comparison of two intervention programmes in young female players in European handball—with and without ankle disc. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13:371-375.

35 Wedderkopp N., Kaltoft M., Lundgaard B., et al. Prevention of injuries in young female players in European team handball. A prospective intervention study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999;9:41-47.

36 Wilkerson G.B., Colston M.A., Short N.I., et al. Neuromuscular changes in female collegiate athletes resulting from a plyometric jump-training program. J Athl Train. 2004;39:17-23.

37 Withrow T.J., Huston L.J., Wojtys E.M., Ashton-Miller J.A. Effect of varying hamstring tension on anterior cruciate ligament strain during in vitro impulsive knee flexion and compression loading. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:815-823.