Cross-sectional investigations, nuclear medicine and ultrasound of the small and large bowel

Published on 12/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2119 times

CHAPTER 17 Cross-sectional investigations, nuclear medicine and ultrasound of the small and large bowel

Introduction

The role of cross-sectional imaging is an integral part of the hospital service and an essential part of the multidisciplinary team approach to the care of the patient both in hospital and in the community. Imaging can clarify clinical assessment, provide presurgical roadmaps, postsurgical complications and aid management decisions. Cross-sectional imaging is also a prerequisite for preassessment planning and performance of an interventional procedure. It is critical in the multidisciplinary meetings and fundamental in the patient care pathway.

Most abdominal imaging is performed to investigate general abdominal symptoms, such as pain, weight loss, bloating or abdominal distension. Abdominal imaging involves a multitude of complex investigations to the uninitiated. Ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radionuclide scanning are all important adjuncts to first line imaging: the abdominal radiograph. They are complementary to each other and the majority of clinical questions can be answered by cross- sectional imaging. Occasionally specialist investigations will be required e.g. indium-111 labelled white cell nuclear scintigraphy when the other imaging modalities have been negative and there are ongoing clinical symptoms or concern. Each investigative method is appropriate for certain clinical questions, when used appropriately it will help make an accurate diagnosis, preventing any treatment delays. To understand the role of each imaging modality you must understand the principle technique, including its value and limitations.

Evidence-based medicine can be defined as the integration of best available research with clinical expertise and patient values (Erturk et al., 2006). You can apply evidence-based practice to any clinical discipline using five basic principles:

Evidence-based radiology (EBR) is an effective tool for radiologists, radiographers, advanced practitioners and clinicians skilled in a particular radiological skill to regularly update their knowledge, deepen their understanding of research methods and (if applicable to clinical setting EBR) can allow effective clinical practice. More importantly for patients this can translate to providing the most up to date clinical practice and care.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound (US) imaging uses high-frequency (greater than 20 kHz) sound waves, which are emitted and received by the ultrasound probe and are inaudible to humans. The frequency of the sound humans hear determines the pitch. Frequency is defined as the number of oscillations per second and Hertz is the unit measurement of frequency. Medical imaging normally uses higher frequencies, in the range of 2.5–10 mHz, with specialist imaging such as intravascular studies requiring frequencies of 20 mHz or more mHz.

The basic essential component of an ultrasound probe is the piezoelectric (PZE) crystal in a shape of a rectangle or disk. When an alternating (AC) current is applied to the crystal, it expands and contracts with the same frequency: this is the ‘piezoelectric effect’. This produces sound waves or echoes. The echoes are transmitted undergoing ‘reflection’, returning at different velocities depending on the media the echoes have encountered within the body. Different tissues will have different acoustic impedance. The proportion of energy (or sound) reflected and transmitted depends on the acoustic impedances of the two materials. In physics terms, the acoustic impedance of a material is defined as the product of the density of the material and the velocity of the sound within it. The greater the acoustic impedance mismatches between two materials the greater the fraction of sound which is reflected and thus imaging is limited. The reflected/returning sound waves act on the PZE crystal in the ultrasound probe to produce an electric signal. The probe is connected to a powerful computer processor that converts the electrical signal into a cross-sectional image. The images are captured in real time and it can show the solid organs and the movement and flow through blood vessels using a special technique of Doppler ultrasound. The image is then displayed on a monitor and may be stored or printed.

The properties of ultrasound are unique. Unlike x-rays or light waves, which can travel through a vacuum, sound waves require a material medium to travel through and thus cannot penetrate air gaps. Ultrasound cannot image through bone or large collections of air. There is also a high acoustic impedance mismatch between the patient’s skin and the probe. This is overcome by the use of ultrasound scanning gel. The advantages and limitations of ultrasound as an imaging modality are outlined in Boxes 17.1 and 17.2.

Patient preparation

Ultrasound of small and large bowel

Ultrasound of the bowel is a sub-specialist technique only performed in specialist centers worldwide. The technique, however, has been found to be of value in the diagnosis of the acute abdomen, in particular diagnosis of acute appendicitis. It is one of the commonest causes for an acute abdomen for the surgical on-call team.

Acute appendicitis in experienced hands is usually diagnosed on history, physical examination and laboratory investigations. The aim of imaging is either to confirm or refute the diagnosis; however, if the appendix is not visualized then appendicitis cannot be excluded. In a female, diagnoses which mimic appendicitis include enlarged ovarian cysts or torsion of the ovaries. Thickening of the wall of a normal appendix wall to 6 mm (3 mm or less is normal) is suggestive of appendicitis (Guillerman and Ng, 2005). Other features include non-compressibility and round in cross-section rather than oval.

Ultrasound of the bowel can be used for bowel obstruction and in Crohn’s disease. Bowel obstruction is considered present at sonography when the lumen of the fluid-filled small bowel loops were dilated more than 3 cm and the length of a segment of the dilated small bowel was over 10 cm; peristalsis of the dilated segment was increased. This is shown by rapid progression or whirling movement of bowel content (Ko et al., 1993).

Ultrasound can be used for the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (an inflammatory bowel disease that may involve various segments of the GIT, although ileal and/or colonic involvement is most frequent); however, the specificity and sensitivity of any test depends on the prevalence of the disease in the population (i.e. the pre-test probability) (Fraquelli et al., 2005).

Endoluminal ultrasound is performed using an axial endoscopic type probe with a 7.5–10 MHz transducer. It is a mechanically rotated probe that produces a 360 degrees cross-sectional image.

Endoluminal ultrasound is excellent for local staging of esophageal cancer. It can define tumor infiltration, as well as local nodal staging. This has major prognostic and management implications, and associated morbidity of open surgery if lesions are detected early. Puncture endosonographic scopes have also been developed to enable fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes and more accurately stage nodal burden (Binmoeller, 1999).

Endoanal ultrasound (Figure 17.2) essentially follows the same principle and has several specific indications. It is used to assess the anal–rectal region, in particular the sphincters. The main indication for endoanal ultrasound is in the investigation of fecal incontinence as well as anal pain (Rottenberg and Wiiliams, 2002).

These are specialized techniques requiring specific training and are preformed in tertiary referral centers.

Computed tomography (CT)

CT uses x-rays to produce the cross-sectional images. The x-ray tube is mounted on a gantry, which is a set of circular rotating metal rings. Directly opposite the x-ray tube is a set of detectors, which collect the information that is analyzed by a powerful computer and displayed on high resolution monitors. The gantry is positioned at the level of interest and the x-ray tube rotates 360 degrees on the gantry. The patient passes through the gantry and the image is acquired in a spiral fashion (or by multislice techniques); previously only one slice was acquired at a time. CT previously was long and cumbersome with respiratory and motion artefact causing limitation in the information acquired. When we discuss spiral or multislice imaging, imagine that the x-ray tube is mounted on an imaginary large Slinky around the patient. These data are transformed into a cross-sectional image using a mathematical technique called Fourier’s transformation. The cross-sectional data are called a data set, just like a stack of coins. The computers give an illusion of one continuous image, when in fact you are scrolling through the data set.

The x-ray beam passes through the patient and is detected on the corresponding side. The x-rays are attenuated to varying degree according to the different tissue densities of the body. High density components (e.g. bone, calcium, metal or contrast material) are attenuated to a greater degree than lower density tissues (fat or soft tissues) and appear white. Fat, soft tissues and lung/air allow more x-rays to pass through and appear black. The image can be manipulated using the computer by altering the ‘window’ settings. Thus you can concentrate on looking at just the lung, bone or soft tissue settings. Figures 17.3, 17.4, 17.5 and 17.6 are examples of abdominal CT anatomy.

Advances in modern computers, software platforms, medical physics and detector technology have all allowed greater imaging capability with improved detail and image manipulations. The data set can be reconstructed into multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images (all three orthogonal planes; sagittal, coronal and axial) or maximum image projection (MIP) images. The advantages and limitations of CT are outlined in Boxes 17.3 and 17.4

Future developments

CT examination was initially obtained as single slice images, it was prolonged, cumbersome and only 2D views were possible. The advent of multi-slice CT with improved high performance software and powerful computers has added a new dimension to all radiological specialities. Examinations are obtained as spiral acquisitions with thin slices. This equates to faster scanning and thus fewer motion artefacts, especially useful for severely sick patients, patients with respiratory compromise (shorter breath hold) and the pediatric population. Overlapping data are obtained which can be mathematically remodeled to produce 3D multiplanar reconstructed images. The narrow slices obtained with multislice CT result in improved spatial resolution. Currently, there are 4, 16, 32 and 64 slice multidetector CT (MDCT) readily available on the market. Future developments include 256 MDCTs which will allow greater temporal and spatial resolution with a non-significant increase in radiation doses. Temporal resolution is essential for cardiac imaging when capturing small coronary vessels at a rapid heart rate.

Appropriate windowing with review on work stations with the original data set is crucial. This is a potential pitfall if only thick axial slices are used to interpret from. Also altering the window levels is useful, as certain pathologies will be made more apparent to the human eye by changing the relative contrast. Reconstructing the original thin axial dataset with the 3D reconstruction function in the three orthogonal planes is invaluable both for reporting and demonstrating the abnormalities to the clinicians.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

MRI physics is highly complex; further details can be found in the recommended text. We will cover the basics only.

MRI uses the properties of a hydrogen atom which is highly abundant in the human body. The hydrogen nucleus has a single proton and a single electron. Water is the biggest source of protons in the body, followed next by fat.

The proton has a positive electric charge and spin. Imagine the proton represents the Earth; it has a North and a South pole and a spin along an axis which is slightly tilted off the centre (Figure 17.8). This is occurring in the human body; the protons are spinning along their axis but spinning randomly. However, once placed inside the magnetic bore, the protons will align in one of two stable states. They will either align parallel (spin-up) or anti-parallel (spin-down) to the strong external magnetic field. A greater proportion will align in the parallel direction and so the net vector (the net direction) will be in the direction of the magnetic field (known as B zero).

Then a second phenomenon on the spinning protons occurs due to the influence of the magnetic field. The B zero causes a secondary spin known as precession. The frequency of the precession is an inherent property of the hydrogen atom in a specific magnetic field strength and is known as the Larmor frequency. Larmor frequency will change depending on the magnetic field strength.

Then, with a second magnetic coil; the radiofrequency (RF) coil, we will apply a strong magnetic field, the RF pulse. The RF pulse causes the net vector to turn 90 degrees towards the transverse plane and to precess in phase (synchronously). This has given energy to the proton called excitation. When RF is removed, the protons want to return to the stable lowest energy state. The extra energy is dissipated to the surroundings in a process known as T1 relaxation. The process of dephasing is known as T2 relaxation.

The net vector in the transverse plane induces a current in magnetic coils known as radiofrequency and the RF receiver coils pick up the signal, to be converted to an image. The advantages and limitations of MRI are given in Boxes 17.5 and 17.6.

Lesions with long T2 are bright.

MR physics is beyond the scope of this chapter and further excellent text is available. Please see recommended reading list.

Clinical indications for magnetic resonance imaging

Rectal carcinoma local tumor MR staging: coronal T1-weighted (Figure 17.11) and sagittal T2-weighted (Figure 17.12) images demonstrate a large tumor in the mid to upper rectum (arrowed). The tumor is annular and there is extramural spread involving the peritoneal reflection. There are a few enlarged mesorectal lymph nodes with a large annular tumor in mid-upper rectum. It is radiologically staged as T4 N1 M0 (Strassburg, 2004).
image

Figure 17.11 Rectal MR: coronal T1W image.

Image courtesy of Dr E. Loveday.

image

Figure 17.12 Rectal MR: sagittal T2W image.

Image courtesy of Dr E. Loveday.

CT, MR colonography and enteroclysis

Each year in the UK, around 16 000 people die from colorectal cancer. At disease presentation, around 55% of people have advanced cancer that has spread to lymph nodes, metastasized to other organs or is so locally advanced that surgery is unlikely to be curative (Dukes’ stage C or D) (Drug Therapy Bulletin, 2006). Overall 5-year survival for colorectal cancer in the UK is around 47–51% (compared to 64% in the USA), but only 7% at most in those presenting with metastatic disease (Drug Therapy Bulletin, 2006). It is now known that colorectal carcinoma can start as an adenomatous (precancerous) polyp then develop to carcinoma in-situ and finally to frankly invasive. The risk of malignant progression increases with the increasing size of the polyp: generally adenomatous polyps 5 mm and below have 0.5% risk, greater than 10 mm have 3–10% risk and greater than 20 mm have 10–50% risk (Dahnert, 2003). Thus there is a significant advantage in detecting adenomatous polyps. Direct colonoscopy is the reference standard as simultaneous biopsy and polyp removal can be achieved. However, it is painful, requires analgesia ± sedatives, may not reach the right side of the colon and has a risk of perforation (Lee et al., 1994). (Please refer to Chapter 20 for a more detailed discussion.)

Developments such as MR and CT colonography (CTC) allow examination of the colon and rectum with the possibilities of detecting polyps and/or carcinomas (Pickhardt et al., 2003). It can be used in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who have a high risk of developing cancer or even those of average risks.

CTC (Figures 17.14, 17.15, see color insert and 17.16) is less invasive with no clinically significant complications (Yee et al., 2001; Pickhardt et al., 2003) unlike direct colonoscopy; though full bowel preparation is required so fecal residue is not misinterpreted. Antispasmodic prior to the scan is given and a distended colon to patient’s toleration, with full distention being the optimum situation. Distention is achieved by insufflation with air or carbon dioxide and spiral acquisition with breath hold in both supine and prone positions (National Institute for Clinical Excellence). The data obtained are used to produce a 2- and 3-dimensional image of the entire colon and rectum, the software enabling the operator to manipulate the data set in order to define lesions. CTC has high average sensitivity and specificity for large and medium polyps in the symptomatic population, but the findings in the asymptomatic population have not been established due to heterogeneity and small numbers in the cohort groups for the various studies (Halligan et al., 2005). CTC techniques are explored further in Chapter 18.

MR colonography on the other hand has no radiation exposure but still requires antispasmodics to minimize bowel peristalsis and spasm. The colon is distended with several litres of tap water with the patient in the prone position. Once complete filling is achieved with adequate colonic distention, intravenous gadolinium is given. The examination is only performed in the prone position and generally it is well tolerated (Lauenstein et al., 2002).

MR enteroclysis imaging is a technique for evaluation of the small bowel, in particular patients with Crohn’s disease. The technique involves administration of 1.5–2 litres of isosmotic water solution through a nasojejunal catheter, which ensures distention of the bowel and facilitates identification of wall abnormalities. This is similar to the traditional enteroclysis technique, but an antiperistaltic agent is essential to acquire images free of motion artefacts. The patient is then imaged with special MRI sequences: FISP (fast imaging with steady state precession) and HASTE (half Fourier acquisition single shot turbo spin echo) (Prassopoulos et al., 2001). The major advantage is the lack of ionizing radiation especially in patients who are diagnosed at a young age with inflammatory bowel disease and will have to have repeated examinations for follow up, disease status or its complications. It provides excellent soft tissue contrast with 3-dimensional images and is able to provide extramural information. However, the spatial resolution is not yet sufficient to delineate superficial abnormalities. It is emerging, but it is not the initial investigation of choice as its clinical utility has not been fully established.

Nuclear medicine

Nuclear medicine uses radioactive labeled pharmaceuticals, which are injected into the patient, and the image is captured by a gamma camera. The radionuclide emits gamma rays (majority of cases); the most commonly used radionuclide is technetium. The radionuclide compound used depends on the area to be examined. The gamma camera detects the gamma rays and converts the absorbed energy into an electrical signal; this is analysed by a computer and then displayed as an image.

Nuclear scintigraphic examinations are highly sensitive to pathology and can detect abnormalities early before changes are apparent on any other cross-sectional imaging. Anatomically detail is not specific but broad anatomical regions can be read. Its other strength is that it provides functional imaging, i.e. how an organ is working or not. The advantages and limitations of scintigraphy are given in Boxes 17.7 and 17. 8.

Nuclear medicine in abdominal imaging

The role of nuclear medicine in relation to the detection of GI bleeding has specific indications. GI bleeding is typically intermittent and requires active bleeding to be localized. When other investigations have been unable to detect the exact site, it is imperative to ‘stop the tap’ in patients where the bleeding is massive or recurrent. This will determine who may benefit from aggressive treatment and who would be appropriate for medical management. The full scintigraphy protocol has been set by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, which can be downloaded from the website (www.snm.org). It must be emphasized that only hemodynamically stable patients should undergo nuclear scintigraphic scan and the unstable patients should immediately undergo angiography (Hastings, 2000). A high level of certainty in localizing the site of bleeding is possible when located in the stomach or the colon. Localizing the bleeding site is less sensitive in the small bowel, especially from the jejunum and ileum (Holder, 2000).

There are several scintigraphic factors which affect the differences in detecting bleeding sites: they include dynamic imaging, delayed imaging and the extra large field of view needed to visualize the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract simultaneously.

Physiological factors affecting detection are: the bleeding flow rate (rapid, moderate, slow, intermittent, minimal, antegrade and retrograde bleeding); the specific bleeding site; and any previous bowel surgery. An indication of the clinical application for scintigraphic assessment in abdominal imaging is given in Table 17.1.

Table 17.1 Clinical application for scintigraphic assessment in abdominal imaging

Organ Radionuclide Clinical application
Liver/spleen 99 mTc Liver/splenic masses
Bile ducts/gallbladder 99 mTc-IDA Acute cholecystitis, biliary obstruction, biliary atresia, post liver transplant
Adrenal medulla 131I-MIBG Localization of pheochromocytoma, staging of neuroblastoma (pediatric population in particular)
Gastrointestinal bleeding 99 mTc-labeled red blood cells Acute gastrointestinal bleeding
Occult infections 67gallium, 111 indium Patients with abdominal abscess or pyrexia of unknown origin

References

Binmoeller K.F. Endoluminal ultrasound for oesophageal cancer. Dig. Endosc. 1999;11(1):3-6.

Dahnert W. Radiology review manual, fifth ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003. ISBN 0–7817–4822–4

Drug Therapy, Bulletin. Population screening for colorectal cancer. Drug Ther. Bull.. 2006;44(9):65-68.

Erturk S.M., Ondategui-Parra S., Otero H., Ros P.R. Evidence-based radiology. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2006;3(7):513-519.

Fraquelli M., Colli A., Paggi S., et al. Role of ultrasound in detection of Crohn’s disease: Meta-analysis. Radiology. 2005;236:95-101.

Guillerman R.P., Ng C.S. Ultrasound of appendicitis. Ultrasound. 2005;13(2):78-85.

Halligan S., Altman D.G., Taylor S.A., et al. Evidence-based practice. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005;237:893-904.

Hastings G.S. Angiographic localization and transcatheter treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding. Radiographics. 2000;20:1160-1168.

Holder L.E. Radionuclide imaging in the evaluation of acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Radiographics. 2000;20(4):1153-1159.

Ko Y.T., Lim J.H., Lee D.H., Lee H.W., Lim J.W. Small bowel obstruction: sonographic evaluation. Radiology. 1993;188:649-653.

Lauenstein T.C., Goehde S.C., Ruehm S.G., Holtmann G., Debatin J.F. MR colonography with barium-based faecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2002;223:248.

Ledermann H.P., Borner N., Strunk H., Bongartz G., Zollikofer C., Struckmann G. Review: bowel wall thickening on transabdominal sonography. Am. J. Radiol. 2000;174:107-117.

Lee P.Y., Fletcher W.S., Sullivan E.S., Vetto J.T. Colorectal cancer in young patients: characteristics and outcome. Am. Surg. 1994;60:607-612.

National Institute for Clinical Excellence, Interventional procedures programme. Interventional procedures overview of computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy). www.nice.com

Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N. Eng. J. Med.. 2003;349:2191-2199.

Prassopoulos P., Papanikolaou N., et al. MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. Radiographics. 2001;21:S161-S172.

Rottenberg G.T., Williams A.B. Pictorial review: Endoanal ultrasound. Br. J. Radiol. 2002;75:482-488.

Society of Nuclear Medicine procedure guidelines for gastrointestinal bleeding and Meckel’s diverticulum scintigraphy. 1999 www.snm.org Version 1.0

.

Strassburg J. The MERCURY experience of MRI. Tech. Coloproctology. 2004;8:S16-S18.

Yee J., Akerkar G.A., Hung R.K., et al. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Gastrointest. Imag. 2001;219:685-692.