Complex Ankle, Subtalar, and Triple Fusions

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2118 times

CHAPTER 19 Complex Ankle, Subtalar, and Triple Fusions

Arthroscopy allows surgeons to perform foot and ankle procedures that would otherwise be contraindicated because of the risks of an open approach. Although early in their development and more time-consuming than their open counterparts, combined arthroscopic subtalar and ankle fusion and arthroscopic triple arthrodesis have increasing roles to play in treating complex conditions in patients who are not candidates for an open procedure.

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis can be extended to include cases with some bone deformity or extensive osteophyte formation if the surgeon is patient and experienced with simpler cases.1 These cases should be performed after the surgeon has achieved proficiency with arthroscopic ankle and subtalar fusion. When the soft tissue envelope is compromised, the additional time required for the more complex operation may be justified by the prevention of soft tissue complications.

NORMAL AND PATHOLOGIC ANATOMY

Anatomic considerations are addressed in Chapter 17. Talonavicular arthritis with deformity or subtalar arthritis is a clear indication for triple arthrodesis. Isolated talonavicular arthritis may be amenable to isolated talonavicular fusion. However, an isolated talonavicular fusion is more likely to progress to a nonunion because there may be motion across the joint despite two screws being used for fixation. Because no significant gain in motion is achieved with an isolated talonavicular fusion compared with a full triple arthrodesis, a triple arthrodesis may be preferable because a larger fusion mass is obtained and better stabilization performed.

Usually, these procedures are performed open. However, for patients with bleeding problems (e.g., hemophilia), poor wound healing, or preexisting scar, a less invasive procedure may be preferable. For patients with anticipated wound-healing problems who are not candidates for an open procedure, an arthroscopic fusion is an ideal alternative.

PATIENT EVALUATION

History and Physical Examination

Physical Examination

Both extremities should be exposed to the knee. While standing, alignment of the hindfoot and forefoot is assessed from behind and in front of the patient.

Gait is observed, concentrating on stance and swing phases. Pain is associated with a reduced stance phase on the painful side and failure to toe-off. On inspection, the location and size of scars, calluses, and ulcers are recorded.

Palpation is used to determine the area of maximum tenderness. In ankle arthritis, this is localized on the anterior and posterior joint margins between the malleoli. For the subtalar joint, the pain is under the fibula, toward the sinus tarsi, behind and inferior to the ankle, and under the medial malleolus. For the talonavicular joint, tenderness is localized medially behind and above the navicular tubercle and just anterior to the ankle joint.

Assessing range-of-motion deficits may assist in determining the painful joints. To isolate the ankle, the examiner should move the talus on the tibia and palpate the joint margin at the same time. For the subtalar joint, the calcaneus is moved on the talus, and for the talonavicular joint, the navicular is moved on the talus. Absolute motion is difficult to measure, but pain and loss of motion (i.e., normal, mild, moderate, or severe restriction) is more instructive than the actual degree of motion.

Special tests include a single-leg heel raise to determine the integrity of the tibialis posterior tendon and the foot’s ability to act as a lever arm. Pulses and sensation should be assessed and recorded.

TREATMENT

Complex Arthroscopic Ankle Fusion

Extensive Osteophyte Formation

In cases with extensive osteophyte formation, the joint may be difficult to instrument with an arthroscope. This situation usually requires an open procedure, but in cases in which the soft tissue complications may merit arthroscopic fusion, it can be performed. However access to the joint may take some time and patience.

Osteophytes can be identified for removal by fluoroscopy before arthroscopy (Fig. 19-1). The osteophytes can be removed through the standard anteromedial and anterolateral arthroscopic portals using a small metatarsal osteotome. The bone fragments must be removed with care so as not to damage the deep branch of the peroneal nerve or its superficial branches. Alternatively, a 3.5- to 4.0-mm, round burr may be used from the medial and lateral approaches to remove the bone spurs under direct visualization. It may be useful to decrease the joint distraction and to dorsiflex the ankle, which allows the anterior joint capsule to relax during removal of anterior tibial and talar neck osteophytes.

Combined Arthroscopic Ankle and Subtalar Fusion

Arthritic ankle and subtalar joints can be fused simultaneously. Fixation can be achieved by using a combination of lag screws or a retrograde intramedullary nail. Use of the arthroscope reduces considerably the size of wounds and therefore the potential for postoperative bleeding complications.

Technique

The patient is positioned on the operating table with the hip on the surgical side elevated to allow access to the lateral ankle and subtalar joint (Fig. 19-3).3 Distraction can be performed using an external distraction device to improve access to the joint. Alternatively, distraction can be performed for the ankle fusion using an Ace Wrap around the surgeon’s waist.

The ankle joint is approached first. The anteromedial and anterolateral portals are used to débride the anterior ankle joint. Posterior débridement requires a posterior portal. I use a portal just behind the medial malleolus. Anatomic dissections have documented that this portal passes posterior to the tibialis posterior tendon and usually passes anterior to the flexor digitorum longus. Alternatively, a standard posterior lateral portal can be used. This approach requires working around the fibula. However, care should be taken not to damage the tibial nerve during the use of both posterior portals. The posterior joint is difficult to débride without using a posterior portal in all but the most lax ankle joints.

After the ankle joint has been completely débrided, the subtalar joint is approached from the lateral portals. Anterolateral, direct lateral, and posterolateral portals are used. The foot is inverted to allow access while the surgeon sits on the lateral side of the table while working the portals of the subtalar joint. Sequential débridement is performed of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint using standard techniques.

After both joints have been débrided, the instruments are withdrawn, and the joints are held in a neutral position. A retrograde rod is the preferred method of fixation in these cases, because its insertion requires minimal exposure while providing a strong mechanical construct.

Retrograde Rod Technique

An incision is made on the plantar aspect of the foot directly in line with the long axis of the tibia with the foot in the corrected position. The starting point can be confirmed on anteroposterior and lateral image views before the incision is made. The starting point usually is 1 to 2 cm behind the calcaneocuboid joint and on the medial slope of the calcaneus (Fig. 19-4). Care should be taken when exposing this part of the calcaneus from the plantar side to ensure that the tibial nerve is not damaged. The nerve lies on the medial side of the approach. Deep dissection should be performed bluntly and the medial soft tissues retracted.

A Kirschner wire is inserted through the calcaneus and into the central aspect of the tibia. A wire inserted off center will result in malreduction of the joint during insertion of the nail. For example, if the wire hits the anterior cortex and bends, reaming the calcaneus and talus in this position will result in a greater degree of flexion than was anticipated. Similarly, extension will occur if the wire hits the posterior cortex.

Some nails have a bend on the distal end that allows more lateral placement of the starting point in the calcaneus, potentially improving calcaneal fixation. Nail designs vary by the fixation achieved (i.e., lateral versus lateral and posterior screw fixation on the distal end), length (i.e., 150 to 300 mm), and compression techniques.

The tibia should be sequentially reamed until appropriate cortical chatter is obtained. The nail is sized for 1 mm less than the last reamer diameter. The reamer should be passed beyond the planned length of the nail to ensure that the nail does not bind in the tibia before being fully seated.

The surgeon should ensure that there is no stress riser at the tip of the nail. Occasionally, the drill for the proximal locking screw passes posterior to the nail and creates a stress riser. In this case, a longer nail should be used to bypass the stress riser.

The retrograde nail should be correctly seated to ensure that the distal locking screws are correctly located within the talus and calcaneus. Compression may be achieved through the fusion site by dynamic proximal fixation. Distal fixation can be performed first, the nail impacted, and then proximal fixation performed. Alternatively, proximal fixation can be achieved first and then distal compression performed on the nail or using an external compression device. Regardless of the sequence, the surgeon should perform some form of compression and should understand the nail system being used. Compression should be performed across the ankle first, followed by the subtalar joint. Failure to compress the joint may result in nonunion. Additional fixation using compression screws around the nail can be performed if the surgeon thinks that additional fixation is required.

Fluoroscopic views are obtained at the end of the procedure. The wounds are closed, and the patient is immobilized during the postoperative period.

Arthroscopic Triple Arthrodesis

Arthroscopic triple arthrodesis is performed for indications similar to those outlined for arthroscopic combined ankle and subtalar fusion. I have found that the primary indication for the arthroscopic procedure is joint degeneration in patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis who have a good potential for poor wound healing.

Contraindications to the arthroscopic procedure include significant bone loss. Patients with significant deformity requiring correction, such as a cavus foot or planovalgus foot, may not be correctable through an arthroscopic approach. A subtle planovalgus foot is easier to correct than a subtle cavus foot, because a flexible foot is required to allow appropriate instrumentation of the joints.

A patient with a stiff talonavicular joint may be difficult to instrument at the talonavicular and subtalar joints. The procedure should therefore be attempted only after the surgeon has gained expertise by performing arthroscopy on joints with easier access.

Technique

The patient is positioned with the operative hip internally rotated on a beanbag or elevated on a bump. The leg is prepared and draped free.2

Talonavicular Fusion.

The talonavicular joint is best approached from a dorsal medial, plantar medial, and dorsal lateral portal. A trans-calcaneocuboid joint portal can assist in visualization of the plantar lateral aspect of the joint (Figs. 19-5 and 19-6).

Care should be taken not to damage the deep branch of the peroneal nerve that is closely apposed to the dorsal capsule of the joint. Palpation of the dorsalis pedis artery before inflation of the tourniquet should assist the surgeon in its correct localization. Confirmation of the position of the cannula by intraoperative fluoroscopy is required, particularly in patients with softer bone (Fig. 19-7).

The arthritic and mobile rheumatoid joint is quite easily instrumented and often requires minimal débridement. When the joint is hard to distract, cautious release of the capsule with a meniscectomy knife may be required. If the joint is stiff, it may be hard to identify. Fluoroscopic confirmation of correct positioning of the cannula is wise, because inadvertent insertion of the cannula into an osteopenic navicular in an arthritic patient can occur. If required, the portal can be expanded to 1 cm, and skin hooks can be used to retract while the joint capsule is released under direct visualization. Alternatively, after the joint is initially visualized, the joint capsule can be released using a meniscectomy blade or small osteotome under direct visualization.

An alternative technique uses a cannulated drill placed across the arthritic joint. The 5-mm drill from the cannulated hip screw set has a diameter to fit the 2.9-mm scope and canula. After the guidewire is placed under fluoroscopic control, the drill is placed across the joint under direct fluoroscopy (Fig. 19-8). Oblique drill placement is used. One drill hole can then be used for the scope and the other for the instruments. However, working outside these drill holes can be problematic for completing cartilage removal. Similarly, tight subtalar and calcaneocuboid joints can be drilled with a cannulated drill to facilitate exposure (Fig. 19-9).

Fixation

Fixation of the arthroscopic triple arthrodesis follows the same screw placement as for the open procedure. Cannulated or solid screws can be used, depending on surgeon’s preference (Fig. 19-10).

The subtalar fusion can be transfixed using two screws from the calcaneus into the talus. Care should be taken to ensure that the screws are within the body of the talus and not laterally placed. The starting point in the calcaneal tuberosity needs to be at the midpoint of the tuberosity or lateral to it to avoid medial penetration of the calcaneus and potential damage to the tibial nerve. Radiographs should include anteroposterior and lateral views of the foot, an anteroposterior view of the ankle, and an axial view of the calcaneus.

Fixation of the talonavicular joint can be performed percutaneously. Small fragment screws are used in all but the largest patients. A cannulated equivalent can also be used. The screws can be inserted from the tuberosity of the navicular, which is easy to palpate. The screws also can be inserted from the dorsomedial and dorsolateral side. Care should be taken to avoid the direct dorsal approach because the deep branch of the peroneal nerve may be injured. The screws must be placed parallel to the plantar surface of the foot to ensure that they engage the talus. Two or three screws should be used on the talonavicular joint.

Fixation of the calcaneocuboid joint can be obtained by a small incision in the sinus tarsi, just behind the anterior process of the calcaneus. The fixation proceeds from just behind the anterior process into the body of the calcaneus. Care should be taken to ensure that the screws are pointing laterally and dorsally enough to engage the cuboid. Two screws are used, with an additional third screw inserted percutaneously from the cuboid into the calcaneus.