Common Fractures

Published on 22/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3037 times

Chapter 675 Common Fractures

Trauma is a leading cause of death and disability in children >1 yr of age. Several factors make fractures of the immature skeleton different from those involving the mature skeleton. The anatomy, biomechanics, and physiology of the pediatric skeletal system are different from those of adults. This results in different fracture patterns (Fig. 675-1), diagnostic challenges, and management techniques specific to children to preserve growth and function.

Epiphyseal lines, rarefaction, dense growth lines, congenital fractures, and pseudofractures appear on radiographs, which could confuse the interpretation of a fracture. Most fractures in children heal well with indifferent treatment; that has led the unwary to neglect the fact that other fractures terminate disastrously if handled with inexpertise. The differences in the pediatric skeletal system predispose children to injuries different from those of adults. The important differences are the presence of periosseous cartilage, physes, and a thicker, stronger, more osteogenic periosteum that produces new bone, called callus, more rapidly and in greater amounts. The pediatric bone has low density and more porosity. The low density is due to lower mineral content and the increased porosity is due to increased number of haversian canals and vascular channels. These differences result in a comparatively lower modulus of elasticity and lower bending strength. The bone in children can fail either in tension or in compression; the fracture lines do not propagate as in adults, and hence there is less chance of comminuted fractures.

Joint injuries, dislocation, and ligament disruptions are uncommon in children. Damage to a contiguous physis is more likely. Interdigitating mammillary bodies and the perichondrial ring enhance the strength of the physes. Biomechanically, the physes are not as strong as the ligaments or metaphyseal bone. The physis is most resistant to traction and least resistant to torsional forces. The periosteum is loosely attached to the shaft of bone and adheres densely to the physeal periphery. The periosteum is usually injured in all fractures, but it is less likely to have complete circumferential rupture, due to its loose attachment to the shaft. This intact hinge or sleeve of periosteum lessens the extent of fracture displacement and assists in reduction. The thick periosteum can also act as an impediment to closed reduction, particularly if the fracture has penetrated the periosteum, or in reduction of displaced growth plate.

675.1 Unique Characteristics of Pediatric Fractures

Fracture Remodeling

Remodeling is the 3rd and final phase in biology of fracture healing, preceded by the inflammatory and reparative phases. This occurs from a combination of appositional bone deposition on the concavity of deformity, resorption on the convexity, and asymmetric physeal growth. Thus, reduction accuracy is somewhat less important than it is in adults (Fig. 675-2). The 3 major factors that have a bearing on the potential for angular correction are skeletal age, distance to the joint, and orientation to the joint axis. The rotational deformity and angular deformity not in the axis of the joint motion are less likely to remodel. The amount of remaining growth provides the basis for remodeling; younger children have greater remodeling potential. Fractures adjacent to a physis undergo the greatest amount of remodeling, provided that the deformity is in the plane of the axis of motion for that joint. The fractures away from the elbow and closer to the knee joint have greater potential to remodel because this physis provides maximal growth to the bone. One can expect remodeling to occur over the next several months following injury throughout skeletal maturity. Skeletal maturity is reached in girls between 13 and 15 yr and in boys between 14 and 16 yr of age.

image

Figure 675-2 Remodeling in children is often extensive, as in this proximal tibial fracture (A) and as seen 1 yr later (B).

(From Dormans JP: Pediatric orthopedics: introduction to trauma, Philadelphia, 2005, Mosby, p 38.)

675.2 Pediatric Fracture Patterns

The different pediatric fracture patterns are the reflection of a child’s characteristic skeletal system. The majority of pediatric fractures can be managed by closed methods and heal well.

Plastic Deformation

Plastic deformation is unique to children. It is most commonly seen in the ulna and occasionally the fibula. The fracture results from a force that produces microscopic failure on the tensile side of bone and does not propagate to the concave side (Fig. 675-4). The concave side of bone also shows evidence of microscopic failure in compression. The bone is angulated beyond its elastic limit, but the energy is insufficient to produce a fracture. Thus, no fracture line is visible radiographically (Fig. 675-5). The plastic deformation is permanent, and a bend in the ulna of <20 degrees in a 4 yr old child is expected to correct with growth.

image

Figure 675-4 Graphic relation of bony deformation (bowing) and force (longitudinal compression) showing that the limit of an elastic response is not a fracture but plastic deformation. If the force continues, a fracture results. A, reversible bowing with stress; B, microfractures occur; C, point of maximal strength; between C and D, bowing fractures; D, linear fracture occurs.

(Modified from Borden S IV: Roentgen recognition of acute plastic bowing of the forearm in children, Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 125:524–530, 1975; from Slovis TL, editor: Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging, ed 11, vol 2, Philadelphia, 2008, Mosby, p 2777.)

image

Figure 675-5 Plastic deformation is a microfailure in tension without a visible fracture line.

(Courtesy of Dr. John Flynn, Children’s Hospital, Philadelphia.)

Buckle or Torus Fracture

A compression failure of bone usually occurs at the junction of the metaphysis and diaphysis, especially in the distal radius (Fig. 675-6). This injury is referred to as a torus fracture because of its similarity to the raised band around the base of a classic Greek column. They are inherently stable and heal in 3-4 wk with simple immobilization.

image

Figure 675-6 Buckle fracture is a partial failure in compression: anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of the distal radius.

(From Dormans JP: Pediatric orthopedics: introduction to trauma, Philadelphia, 2005, Mosby, p 37.)

Epiphyseal Fractures

The injuries to the epiphysis involve the growth plate. There is always a potential for deformity to occur, and hence long-term observation is necessary. The distal radial physis is the most commonly injured physis. Salter and Harris (SH) classified epiphyseal injuries into 5 groups (Table 675-1 and Fig. 675-7). This classification helps to predict the outcome of the injury and offers guidelines in formulating treatment. SH type I and II fractures usually can be managed by closed reduction techniques and do not require perfect alignment, because they tend to remodel with growth. SH type II fractures of the distal femoral epiphysis need anatomic reduction. The SH type III and IV epiphyseal fractures involve the articular surface and require anatomic alignment to prevent any step off and realign the growth cells of the physis. SH type V fractures are usually not diagnosed initially. They manifest in the future with growth disturbance. Other injuries to the epiphysis are avulsion injuries of the tibial spine and muscle attachments to the pelvis. Osteochondral fractures are also defined as physeal injuries that do not involve the growth plate.

Table 675-1 SALTER-HARRIS CLASSIFICATION

SALTER-HARRIS TYPE CHARACTERISTICS
I Separation through the physis, usually through the zones of hypertrophic and degenerating cartilage cell columns
II Fracture through a portion of the physis but extending through the metaphyses
III Fracture through a portion of the physis extending through the epiphysis and into the joint
IV Fracture across the metaphysis, physis, and epiphysis
V Crush injury to the physis

Child Abuse

The orthopedic surgeon sees 30-50% of physically abused children. Child abuse should be expected in nonambulatory children with lower extremity long bone fractures (Chapter 37). No fracture pattern or types are pathognomonic for child abuse; any type of fracture can result from nonaccidental trauma. The fractures that suggest intentional injury include femur fractures in nonambulatory children, distal femoral metaphyseal corner fractures, posterior rib fractures, scapular spinous process fractures, and proximal humeral fractures. A skeletal survey is essential in every suspected case of child abuse, because it can demonstrate other fractures in different stages of healing. Radiographically, some systemic diseases mimic signs of child abuse, such as osteogenesis imperfecta, osteomyelitis, Caffey disease, and fatigue fractures. Many hospitals have a multidisciplinary team to evaluate and treat patients who are victims of child abuse. It is mandatory to report these cases to social welfare agencies.

Bibliography

Bandyopandhyay S, Yen K. Non-accidental fractures in child maltreatment syndrome. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2002;3:145-152.

Davidson JS, Brown DJ, Barnes SN, et al. Simple treatment for torus fractures of the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1173-1175.

Della-Giustina K, Della-Giustina DA. Emergency department evaluation and treatment of pediatric orthopedic injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999;17:895-922.

Drendel AL, Gorelick MH, Weisman SJ, et al. A randomized clinical trial of ibuprofen versus acetaminophen with codeine for acute pediatric arm fracture pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:553-560.

Green NE, Swiontkowski MF, editors. Skeletal trauma in children, ed 3, vol 3. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2001.

Jadhav SP, Swischuk LE. Commonly missed subtle skeletal injuries in children: a pictorial review. Emerg Radiol. 2008;15(6):391-398.

Kemp AM, Dunstan F, Harrison S, et al. Patterns of skeletal fractures in child abuse: systematic review. BMJ. 2008;337:a1518.

Olney RC, Mazur JM, Pike LM, et al. Healthy children with frequent fractures: how much evaluation is needed? Pediatrics. 2008;121:890-897.

Overly F, Steele DW. Common pediatric fractures and dislocations. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2002;3:106-117.

Plint AC, Perry JJ, Correll R, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of removable splinting versus casting for wrist buckle fractures in children. Pediatrics. 2006;117:691-697.

Poolman RW. Adjunctive non-invasive ways of healing bone fractures. BMJ. 2009;338:611-612.

Thompson GH, Haber LL. Upper extremity fractures in the pediatric patients. In: Fitzgerald RHJr, Kaufer H, Malkani A, editors. Orthopaedics. St Louis: Mosby; 2002:484-494.

675.3 Upper Extremity Fractures

Phalangeal Fractures

The different phalangeal fracture patterns in children include physeal, diaphyseal, and tuft fractures. The mechanism of injury is a direct blow to the finger or typically a finger trapped in a door (Chapter 673). Crush injuries of the distal phalanx manifest with severe comminution of the underlying bone (tuft fracture), disruption of the nail bed, and significant soft-tissue injury. These injuries are best managed with antibiotics, tetanus prophylaxis, and irrigation. A mallet finger deformity is the inability to extend the distal portion of the digit and is caused by a hyperextension injury. It represents an avulsion fracture of the physis of the distal phalanx. The treatment is splinting the digit in extension for 3-4 wk. The physeal injuries of the proximal and middle phalanx are similarly treated with splint immobilization. Diaphyseal fractures may be oblique, spiral, or transverse in fracture geometry. They are assessed for angular and rotational deformity with the finger in flexion. Any malrotation or angular deformity requires correction for optimal functioning of the hand. These deformities are corrected with closed reduction, and if unstable, they need stabilization.

Forearm Fractures

Fractures of the wrist and forearm are very common fractures in children, accounting for nearly half of all fractures seen in the skeletally immature. The most common mechanism of injury is a fall on the outstretched hand. Eighty percent of forearm fractures involve the distal radius and ulna, 15% involve the middle third, and the rest are rare fractures of the proximal third of the radius or ulnar shaft. The majority of forearm fractures are torus or greenstick fractures. The torus fracture is an impacted fracture, and there is minimal soft-tissue swelling or hemorrhage. They are best treated in a short arm (below the elbow) cast and usually heal within 3-4 wk. Wrist buckle fractures have also been successfully treated with a removable splint. Impacted greenstick fractures of the forearm tend to be intrinsically stable (no cortical disruption) and may be managed with a soft bandage rather than casting.

Diaphyseal fractures could be more difficult to treat because the limits of acceptable reduction are much more stringent than for distal radial fractures. A significant malunion of a forearm diaphyseal fracture can lead to a permanent loss of pronation and supination, leading to functional difficulties. The physical examination focuses on soft-tissue injuries and ruling out any neurovascular involvement. The anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of the forearm and wrist confirm the diagnosis. Displaced and angulated fractures require manipulative closed reduction under general anesthesia. They are immobilized in an above-elbow cast for at least 6 wk. Loss of reduction and unstable fractures require open reduction and internal fixation.

Distal Humeral Fractures

Fractures around the elbow receive more attention because more aggressive management is needed to achieve a good result. Many injuries are intra-articular, involve the physeal cartilage, and can result in rare malunion or nonunion. As the distal humerus develops from a series of ossification centers, these ossification centers can be mistaken for fractures by inexperienced eyes. Careful radiographic evaluation is an essential part of diagnosing and managing distal humeral injuries. Common fractures include separation of the distal humeral epiphysis (transcondylar fracture), supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus, and epiphyseal fractures of the lateral or medial condyle. The mechanism of injury is a fall on an outstretched arm. The physical examination includes noting the location and extent of soft-tissue swelling, ruling out any neurovascular injury, specifically anterior interosseous nerve involvement or evidence of compartment syndrome. A transcondylar fracture in neonates should raise suspicion of child abuse. AP and lateral radiographs of the involved extremity are necessary for the diagnosis. If the fracture is not visible, but there is an altered relationship between the humerus and the radius and ulna or the presence of a posterior fat pad sign, a transcondylar fracture or an occult fracture should be suspected. Imaging studies such as CT, MRI, and ultrasonography may be required for further confirmation.

In general, distal humeral fractures need good restoration of anatomic alignment. This is necessary to prevent deformity and to allow for normal growth and development. Closed reduction alone, or in association with percutaneous fixation, is the preferred method. Open reduction is necessary for fractures that cannot be reduced by closed methods. Inadequate reductions can lead to cubitus varus, cubitus valgus, and rare nonunion or elbow instability.

Clavicular Fractures

Neonatal fractures occur as a result of direct trauma during birth, most often through a narrow pelvis or following shoulder dystocia. They can be missed initially and can appear with pseudoparalysis. Childhood fractures are usually the result of a fall on the affected shoulder or direct trauma to the clavicle. The most common site for fracture is the junction of the middle and lateral 3rd clavicle. Tenderness over the clavicle will make the diagnosis. A thorough neurovascular examination is important to diagnose any associated brachial plexus injury.

An AP radiograph of the clavicle demonstrates the fracture and can show overlap of the fragments. Physeal injuries occur through the medial or lateral growth plate and are sometimes difficult to differentiate from dislocations of the acromioclavicular or sternoclavicular joint. Further imaging such as a CT scan may be necessary to further define the injury. The treatment of most clavicle fractures consists of an application of a figure-of-eight clavicle strap. This will extend the shoulders and minimize the amount of overlap of the fracture fragments. For older adolescents with fracture fragments tinting the skin, operative management is increasingly more advised. The physeal fractures are treated with simple sling immobilization without any reduction attempt. Often, anatomic alignment is not achieved, nor is it necessary. The fractures heal rapidly usually in 3-6 wk. Usually a palpable mass of callus is visible in thin children. This remodels satisfactorily in 6-12 mo. Complete restoration of shoulder motion and function is uniformly achieved.

675.4 Fractures of Lower Extremity

Triplane and Tillaux Fractures

Triplane and Tillaux fracture patterns occur at the end of the growth period and are based on relative strength of the bone-physis junction and asymmetric closure of the tibial physis. The triplane fractures are so named because the injury has coronal, sagittal, and transverse components (Fig. 675-8). The Tillaux fracture is an avulsion fracture of the anterolateral aspect of the distal tibial epiphysis. Radiographs and further imaging with CT and 3-dimensional reconstructions are necessary to analyze the fracture geometry. The triplane fracture involves the articular surface and hence anatomic reduction is necessary. The reduction is further stabilized with internal fixation. The Tillaux fracture is treated by closed reduction. Open reduction is recommended if a residual intra-articular step off persists.

image

Figure 675-8 The triplane fracture is a transitional fracture: anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs.

(From Dormans JP: Pediatric orthopedics: introduction to trauma, Philadelphia, 2005, Mosby, p 38.)

675.5 Operative Treatment

Four to 5% of pediatric fractures require surgery. The common indications for operative treatment in children and adolescents include displaced physeal fractures, displaced intra-articular fractures, unstable fractures, multiple injuries, open fractures, failure to achieve adequate reduction in older children, failure to maintain an adequate reduction, and certain pathologic fractures.

The aim of operative intervention is to obtain anatomic alignment and relative stability. Rigid fixation is not necessary as it is in adults for early mobilization. The relatively stable construct can be supplemented with external immobilization. SH type III and IV injuries require anatomic alignment, and if they are unstable, internal fixation is used (smooth Kirschner wires, preferably avoiding the course across the growth plate). Multiple closed reductions of an epiphyseal fracture are contraindicated because they can cause permanent damage to the germinal cells of the physis.

Surgical Techniques

It is important to take great care with soft tissues and skin. The other indications for open reduction and internal fixation are unstable fractures of the spine, ipsilateral fractures of the femur, neurovascular injuries requiring repair, and, occasionally, open fractures of the femur and tibia. Closed reduction and minimally invasive fixation are specifically used for supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus, phalangeal fractures, and femoral neck fractures. Failure to obtain anatomic alignment by closed means is an indication for an open reduction.

The main indications for external fixation are summarized in Table 675-3. The advantages of external fixation include rigid immobilization of the fractures, access to open wounds for continued management, and easier patient mobilization for treatment of other injuries and transportation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The majority of complications with external fixation are pin tract infections, chronic osteomyelitis, and refractures after pin removal.

Table 675-3 COMMON INDICATIONS FOR EXTERNAL FIXATION IN PEDIATRIC FRACTURES

675.6 Complications of Fractures in Children

Lawrence Wells, Kriti Sehgal, and John P. Dormans

The complications specific to children are malalignment and correction by natural growth, physeal arrest, overgrowth, and refracture caused by rapid fracture healing (Table 675-4). The malalignment and late angulation is a common problem with fractures of the proximal tibial metaphysis. The physeal arrest can cause angular deformity or shortening. The angular deformities are treated by hemiepiphysiodesis or osteotomy. The shortening is treated with contralateral leg epiphysiodesis closer to skeletal maturity or lengthening of the short limb. Refractures cause more deformity and can necessitate open reduction. Other complications are reflex sympathetic dystrophy, ligamentous instability, malunion, nonunion, fat embolism, and neurovascular injuries.