Combinations of Therapy

Published on 15/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Dermatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1592 times

14 Combinations of Therapy

Introduction

Chemical peeling has remained a premiere method of resurfacing the skin for over 100 years. In this time frame, many other procedures for rejuvenation of aging skin have come and gone, but peeling has persisted as a tried and true, reliable method of ablative resurfacing: superficial, medium depth and deep. The body of scientific knowledge correlating the chemistry, histology, depth of penetration, and clinical outcome studies for technique and methodology has reinforced the solid position of this procedure with all preceding techniques. As dermabrasion, ablative resurfacing lasers, nonablative lasers and light sources, fillers, and injectables have come to the forefront to become major tools in facial rejuvenation, peels first fell out of favor, but then were rediscovered when those procedures were used enough to realize their true position alongside chemical peeling. The concept of combination procedures with peeling has surged. Peeling, in many instances, is the glue that holds together other procedures.

Today’s cosmetic physician has many tools to use in facial rejuvenation. Combining the appropriate tools together reduces the morbidity, time of healing, and potential for complications as well as improving the results. In relationship to peeling, this has reduced the aggressivity of single peel procedures. The physician can now use combination peels and apply appropriate levels of resurfacing to specific cosmetic units based on the degree of wrinkling. For example, Glogau type III photoaging in the perioral and periorbital areas needs to be treated with a resurfacing laser or deep chemical peel while the remaining face could be treated less aggressively with a medium-depth combination peel such as the Jessner’s–35% TCA peel (Monheit). Similarly, other procedures such as facial volume filling and contouring with appropriate filling agents will restore facial structure leaving the peel to ablate the surface. Botulinum toxin injected for appropriate dynamic wrinkles will improve the initial appearance as well as improve the long term peel results. Thus less aggressive resurfacing procedures need to be used together to improve overall results.

The cosmetic physician’s tools can be divided into the following categories:

Each of these addresses a regular specific problem related to the aging face. Using these tools in combination procedures will give the best of results.

The various regenerative procedures are also classified as to the level of aggressiveness and downtime. They range from ‘lunchtime’ procedures and moderately aggressive procedures to fully aggressive procedures. Each of these also can be chosen for the appropriate patient and even the proper unit area of need. These procedures are outlined in Table 14.1. See also Box 14.1.

The Analysis of Skin Types

Analyzing the patient with photoaging skin must take into account skin color and skin type as well as the degree of photoaging. Various classification systems have been available and the author would like to present a combination of three systems that would simplify and help the physician define the right program or therapeutic procedure for his patient. Thus the specific problems the patient presents can be paired with the correct solutions.

Fitzpatrick skin type system

The Fitzpatrick skin type system classifies degrees of pigmentation and ability to tan using grades I to VI. It prognosticates sun sensitivity, susceptibility to photodamage and ability for facultative melanogenesis (one’s intrinsic ability to tan). In addition, this system classifies skin as to its risk factors for complications during chemical peeling or other resurfacing procedures. Fitzpatrick skin types take into account both color and reaction to the sun. Skin types I and II are pale white and freckled with a high degree of potential to burn with sun exposure. Types III and IV can burn but usually are an olive to brown coloration. Types V and VI are dark brown to black skin that rarely ever burn and usually do not need sunscreen protection (Table 14.2).

Table 14.2 Fitzpatrick’s classification of skin types

Skin type Color Reaction to sun
I Very white or freckled Always burns
II White Usually burns
III White to olive Sometimes burns
IV Brown Rarely burns
V Dark brown Very rarely burns
VI Black Never burns

The patient with type I or II skin with significant photodamage needs regular sunscreen protection prior to and after the procedure. The patient, though, has little risk for hypopigmentation, reactive hyperpigmentation or postinflammatory hypopigmentation (PIH) after a chemical peeling procedure. However, a patient with any of the skin types from III to VI has a greater risk for pigmentary dyschromia – hyper or hypopigmentation – after a chemical peel and may need pre and post treatment with both sunscreen and bleaching products to prevent these complications. Pigmentary risks are generally not a great problem with very superficial and superficial chemical peeling but may become a significant problem with medium and deep chemical peels as well as CO2 or fractional laser resurfacing. It can also be a risk when regional areas such as lips and eyelids are peeled with deep peeling or pulsed CO2 laser, creating a significant color change in these cosmetic units from the rest of the face. This has been classified as the ‘alabaster look’ that is seen with taped, deep chemical peels in regional areas. This is an objectionable side-effect of deep taped phenol peeling, and to a lesser extent with laser resurfacing, and should be avoided now as patients demand a natural look. Though this was an acceptable look in the 1970s, it is generally not tolerated in the new millennium. The physician must inform patients of this potential problem (especially those with skin types III to VI) for full face deep peels or resurfacing procedures, justifying the benefits of the procedure, outweighing these risks and, in addition, plan for the appropriate techniques to prevent these unwanted changes in color.

Glogau system

The Glogau system classifies severity of photodamage, taking into account the degree of epidermal and dermal degenerative effects. The categorization is from I to IV, ranging from mild, through moderate and advanced, to severe photodamaged skin. These categories are devised for therapeutic intervention. Type I in young individuals or minimal degree photodamage should be treated with light chemical peeling and medical treatment. Types II and III would entail medium-depth chemical peeling, while type IV would need those modalities listed plus cosmetic surgical intervention for gravitational changes (Box 14.2). Type III or IV can have combination procedures dependent on the degree of damage in each area.

Based on Glogau RG 1994 Chemical peeling and aging skin. Journal of Geriatric Dermatology 2(1):30–35

Index of photoaging skin

The index of photoaging skin is a system of quantitating photodamage and using numerical scores that would fit into corresponding rejuvenation programs. In analyzing photodamage, the major categories include epidermal color, skin lesions, textural changes, and dermal changes. Photoaging changes include wrinkles, cross-hatched lines, sallow color, leathery appearance, crinkly thin parchment skin, and the pebblish white nodules of milia. Each of these is classified, giving the patient a point score of between one and four. In addition, the number and extent of lesions are categorized from freckles, lentigines, telangiectasias, actinic and seborrheic keratoses, skin cancers, and senile comedones. These are also added in the classification system and the final score results are tabulated. A total score of between one and four indicates very mild damage and the patient would adequately respond to a five-step skin care program including sunscreen protection, retinoic acid, glycolic acid peels and selective lesional removal. A patient scoring between five and nine requires all of the above, plus a repetitive superficial peeling agents program such as glycolic acid, Jessner’s solution or lactic acid peels. A score of 10–14 suggests the inclusion of medium-depth chemical peeling, and if a patient scores 15 or above the practitioner will be including deep peeling or laser resurfacing in the treatment (Figs 14.1 and 14.2). Thus, the patient can understand during the consultation the degree of photodamage and the necessity for an individual peeling program (Table 14.3). The system can also quantitate individual cosmetic units indicating more aggressive resurfacing for the lids and/or lips than surrounding cheeks and forehead.

The chief indications for chemical peeling are associated with the reversal of actinic changes such as photodamage, rhytids, actinic growths, pigmentary dyschromias, and acne scars. The physician thus can use his classification systems to quantitate the level of photodamage and prescribe the appropriate chemical peeling combination.

Types of Combination Chemical Peel

Superifical chemical peeling

Minimally aggressive procedures are commonly combined with superficial chemical peels to enhance the benefits of these procedures. Light chemical peels commonly used include:

Each of these agents has its own characteristics and methodology and a physician must be thoroughly familiar with the chemicals, methods of application, and the nature of healing. The usual time for healing is from 1 to 4 days depending on the chemical and its strength. These agents range from noninflammatory (salicylic acid peels) to moderately inflammatory (Jessner’s solution) and each has a specific purpose (Fig. 14.3).

Cosmeceutical pharmaceutical agents are commonly combined with chemical peels to enhance exfoliative and regenerative effects. Retinoic acid preparations are prescribed as daily home care to accelerate epidermal proliferation, so there is an increase in epidermal thickness despite the stratum corneum being shed. The application of retinoic acid enhances the effectiveness of light and even medium-depth chemical peeling to texture, tone, and smooth the skin. Used in combination with alpha-hydroxy acids (AHAs) retinoic acid prepares the skin for the peel procedure.

Glycolic acid creams, cleansers, and exfoliating preparations are used to boost epidermal exfoliation, reduce stratum corneum thickness and augment the peel penetration, thus enhancing the uniformity of the light chemical peel. Pretreatment is also essential for combination medium-depth peels.

Sunscreens are necessary accompaniments to all peeling procedures and the patient should begin this prior to the peel. The proper FDA approved sunscreen should be chosen based on the patient’s skin type and procedure chosen. The choices are UVA filters, UVB filters and inorganic sunscreens (Table 14.4).

Table 14.4 Sunscreens and their photo protection

Screens UV protection (nm)
UVB  
p-Aminobenzoic acid (PABA) 260–315
Salicylates 260–310
Cinnamates 280–310
UVA  
Benzophenones 270–350
Meradimate 336
Avobenzone 310–40
Inorganic screens  
Titanium dioxide 290–360
Zinc oxide 290–400

When treating pigmentary problems such as melasma, reactive pigmentary dyschromias or treating skin types III–V, the peeling procedure should be accompanied by a topical bleaching product, retinoic acid and a sunscreen. Hydroquinone is a pharmacologic agent that blocks the enzyme tyrosinase from developing melanin precursors for the production of new pigment. Its use will block the production of new pigment as the new epidermis is healing after a chemical peel. Together, this topical combination of hydroquinone, retinoids and sunscreens will enhance the effect of the peel for pigmentary problems. Pretreatment should be instituted six weeks prior to the peel procedure for maximal benefit.

The peeling agent of choice to use for light pigmentary problems is salicylic acid, 20 or 30%. It is noninflammatory, reducing the potential for reactive postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. This is a repetitive procedure that usually takes three to six treatment sessions over 4 to 6 months. Other adjunctive procedures that will supplement peeling and cosmeceuticals for pigmentary problems include microdermabrasion to enhance exfoliation and selective lasers such as intense pulsed light, 532 nm, diode and Q-switch yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG).

Light chemical peeling for photoaging changes utilizes the more inflammatory agents such as Jessner’s solution, glycolic acid and TCA (Fig. 14.4). These procedures can all be combined with cosmeceutical agents and even exfoliative procedures such as microdermabrasion. It is also combined with intense pulsed light, photomodulation and selective lasers. The peels will produce epidermal sloughing of various degrees and thus should not be performed on the same day as the other procedures. Separating them by alternating weeks of treatment will allow enough recovery for the combined procedures to be effective.

TCA has been the most versatile of all peeling agents and has been used in concentrations weight-per-volume from 15% to 50%. As concentration increases, ablative injury is greater as well as rejuvenative effects for photoaging skin. In most patients, TCA in concentrations above 25–30% affects the dermis as well as epidermis, having the effect of medium and deeper chemical peels (Fig. 14.5).

Medium-depth chemical peeling

Medium-depth peels consist of controlled damage through the epidermis and papillary dermis, with variable extension to the upper reticular dermis. Both medium-depth and deep chemical peeling produce epidermal necrosis, papillary dermal edema and homogenization, and a sparse lymphocytic infiltrate within the first several days. During the following 3 months postoperatively, there is increased collagen production with expansion of the papillary dermis and the development of a mid-dermal band of thick, elastic-staining fibers. These changes correlate with continued clinical improvement in texture and smoothness during this time.

For many years, 40 to 60% TCA was the prototypical medium-depth peeling agent because of its ability to ameliorate fine wrinkles, actinic changes, and preneoplasia. TCA as a single agent for medium-depth peeling has fallen out of favor because of the high risk of complications, especially scarring and pigmentary alterations, when used in strengths approaching 50% and higher. Today, most medium-depth chemical peels are combination peels performed utilizing 35% TCA in combination with either Jessner’s solution, 70% glycolic acid, or solid carbon dioxide (CO2) as a ‘priming’ agent (Table 14.5). These combination peels have been found to be as effective as 50% TCA alone but with fewer risks. The level of penetration is more easily controlled with these combination peels, thereby preventing the ‘hot spots’ that can produce the dyschromias and scarring seen with higher concentrations of TCA.

Table 14.5 Agents used for medium-depth chemical peeling

Agent Comment
40–50% Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) Not recommended
Combination 35% TCA–solid CO2 (Brody) The most potent combination
Combination 35% TCA–Jessner’s (Monheit) The most popular combination
Combination 35% TCA–70% glycolic acid (Coleman) An effective combination
88% phenol Rarely used

Brody developed the use of solid CO2 to freeze the skin prior to the application of 35% TCA. This causes complete epidermal necrosis and significant dermal edema, thereby allowing deeper penetration of the TCA in selected areas. This technique is particularly useful to efface the edges of mild acne scars and to destroy thicker epidermal growths. The author then described a combination medium-depth peel in which Jessner’s solution is applied, followed by 35% TCA. Similarly, Coleman and Futrell have demonstrated the use of 70% glycolic acid prior to the application of 35% TCA for medium-depth peeling. The Jessner’s solution and glycolic acid both appear to effectively weaken the epidermal barrier and allow deeper, more uniform, and more controlled penetration of the 35% TCA.

Current indications for combination medium-depth chemical peeling include Glogau type II photoaging, epidermal lesions such as actinic keratoses, pigmentary dyschromias, and mild acne scarring, and also to blend the effects of deeper resurfacing procedures.

The Jessner’s–TCA Peel

The most popular of the medium-depth peels for facial rejuvenation is the Jessner’s–35% TCA peel. This peel has been widely accepted because of its broad range of uses, the large number of people in whom it is indicated, its ease of modification according to the situation, and its excellent safety profile.

The Jessner’s–35% TCA peel is particularly useful for the improvement of mild to moderate photoaging (Fig. 14.6A). It freshens sallow, atrophic skin and softens fine rhytids, with minimal risk of textural or pigmentary complications. Collagen remodeling occurs for as long as 3 to 4 months postoperatively, during which there is continued improvement in texture and fine rhytides. Deep furrows, however, are not eliminated with this peel. When used in conjunction with a retinoid, bleaching agent, and sunscreens, a single Jessner’s–35% TCA peel lessens pigmentary dyschromias and lentigines more effectively than repetitive superficial peels (Fig. 14.7). Epidermal growths such as actinic keratoses also respond well to this peel. In fact, the Jessner’s–35% TCA peel has been found to be as effective as topical 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in removing both grossly visible and clinically undetectable actinic keratoses but has the added advantages of lower morbidity and greater improvement in associated photoaging (Fig. 14.8).

The Jessner’s–35% TCA peel is effective in combination to blend the effects of other resurfacing procedures with the surrounding skin. Patients who undergo laser resurfacing, deep chemical peeling or dermabrasion to a localized area such as the periorbital or perioral region often develop a sharp line of demarcation between the treated and untreated skin. The treated skin may appear hypopigmented (also known as pseudohypopigmentation) in comparison to the untreated skin. These irregularities are often conspicuous and are troubling to the patient. A Jessner’s–35% TCA peel performed on the adjacent untreated skin helps to blend the area treated with deep resurfacing with its surroundings. For example, a patient with advanced photoaging in the periorbital region and moderate photoaging on the remaining face may desire CO2 laser resurfacing only around the eyes. In this patient, medium-depth chemical peeling of the areas not treated with the laser would improve the photoaging in these regions and avoid a line of demarcation (see Fig. 14.6B–F). Similarly, a patient having spot dermabrasion to a localized scar would benefit from a Jessner’s–35% TCA peel to the remainder of that cosmetic unit or to the rest of the face. It is important to note that when used in combination with other resurfacing procedures such as laser resurfacing or dermabrasion, the peel should be performed first in order to avoid accidental application of the peeling agent onto previously abraded areas of skin.

The combination Jessner’s–35% TCA peel should be a part of the patient’s full rejuvenation program. This should include botulinum toxin to relax glabellar, forehead and perioral wrinkles, soft tissue filling agents such as hyaluronic acid to fill deep grooves and augment areas of facial atrophy. In addition, selective lasers are used to treat vascular lesions such as telangiectasias and hemangiomas that do not respond to peel alone. These auxillary procedures should be performed at least one week prior to the peel so that there is no interference with the healing process.

Deep chemical peeling

Deep resurfacing is defined as tissue injury to the upper reticular dermis. This can be accomplished with the Baker-Gordon peel, CO2 resurfacing laser or dermabrasion.

Patients with Glogau types III and IV may require deep chemical peeling, motorized dermabrasion, or laser resurfacing to improve their greater degree of skin damage. As discussed with medium-depth peels, deep chemical peeling leads to production of new collagen and ground substance down to a level in proportion with the depth of the peel. Deep peels create an injury through the papillary dermis, into the upper reticular dermis, and may extend into the mid-reticular dermis. Deep peeling entails the use of either TCA in concentrations above 50% or a phenol-containing preparation. Because of the risk of scarring and other complications with such potent concentrations of TCA, this agent is not recommended for deep chemical peeling. Therefore, solutions containing phenol remain the agents of choice for deep chemical peels.

Phenol Peeling

The application of pure, undiluted, 88% phenol to the skin causes rapid and complete coagulation of epidermal keratin proteins and is thought to block itself from further penetration. Classified as a medium-depth peeling agent, pure phenol is rarely used for chemical peeling because its limited depth of penetration results in a lesser degree of effectiveness. In contrast, the Baker-Gordon peel utilizes phenol in a formulation that permits deeper penetration into the dermis than full-strength phenol. First described in 1961, the Baker-Gordon peel has been used successfully for many years and the formula consists of Septisol (Vestal Laboratories, St. Louis, MO), croton oil, and tap water added to a solution of phenol, reducing its concentration to 50 or 55% (Table 14.6). The mixture of ingredients is freshly prepared and must be stirred vigorously prior to application, owing to its poor miscibility. The liquid soap, Septisol, is a surfactant that reduces skin tension, allowing a more even penetration. Croton oil is a vesicant epidermolytic agent that enhances phenol absorption. Recent investigations into the effects of this peel using varying concentrations of both phenol and croton oil have suggested that the procedure’s efficacy is more related to the amount of croton oil than the concentration of phenol. Modifications of the original Baker-Gordon formula in order to improve the risk to benefit ratio of deep peeling are discussed in depth in Chapter 8.

Table 14.6 The Baker-Gordon formula

88% liquid phenol, USP (BP) 3 mL
Tap water 2 mL
Septisol liquid soap 8 drops
Croton oil 3 drops

There are two main variations in deep chemical peeling with the Baker-Gordon phenol formula: occluded and unoccluded. Occlusion of the peeling solution with tape is thought to increase its penetration and extend the injury into the mid-reticular dermis. This technique is particularly helpful for deeply lined, ‘weather-beaten’ faces but should be utilized only by experienced surgeons because of the higher risk of complications. The unoccluded technique, as modified by McCollough, involves more abrasive cleansing of the skin and the application of multiple coats of peel solution in one sitting. This may enhance the efficacy of the solution but without penetrating as deeply as in an occluded peel. In the hands of a skilled and knowledgeable surgeon, both methods are safe and reliable in rejuvenating advanced to severe photoaged skin.

As one evaluates cosmetic units, the deep resurfacing technique (Baker-Gordon peel or CO2 resurfacing) may be indicated only for the periorbital and perioral sites. The combination Jessner’s TCA peel is then used on the remaining face as a less aggressive procedure. This greatly decreases the danger of a phenol peel as less surface area is affected lowering the serum level of phenol and its systemic toxicity. The procedure can be performed with local blocks to the deep resurfacing areas with less overall discomfort and a quicker recovery.

Combining Levels of Peel and Other Procedures

Deep chemical peeling can significantly improve or even eliminate deep furrows as well as other textural and pigmentary irregularities associated with severe photoaging (Fig. 14.9). A remarkable degree of improvement is the expected result of deep chemical peeling when performed properly on carefully selected patients. Combining superficial, medium-depth and deep peeling and/or resurfacing procedures will selectively give the cosmetic unit or area of the body the safest and most effective level of resurfacing (Table 14.7).

Combining peels with other procedures

Dermasanding/Dermal Sanding and Dermabrasion

Dermasanding is used as an added procedure with medium-depth, facial chemical peeling in which further resurfacing is needed. It is used for the following indications:

Silicone carbide sandpaper is found at a local hardware store and comes in the following grades (grit): coarse (120–180), medium (220–320) and fine (400). The author only uses medium and fine to further resurface after a chemical peel. The manual dermasanding can take the resurfacing procedure to a greater depth without the risk of further chemical or thermal damage. The sandpaper is cut into 2 cm × 6 cm strips, sterilized in surgical packs, and used individually. They are then rolled around 2″ × 2″ (5 cm2) gauze or tongue blade. The paper is wetted with saline or lidocaine to reduce drag as the skin is stretched and then manually dermasanded (Fig. 14.11). The white frosted skin is removed until fine bleeding points are seen as an endpoint.

Dermasanding is used with medium-depth chemical peeling to remove thick, keratotic lesions not amenable to peel alone. An example is the patient with diffuse, thick seborrheic keratoses with photoaging skin. Such lesions cannot be removed by peel as the only treatment. A medium depth peel is performed first; then, after the skin has frosted appropriately, the keratotic lesions are removed by dermasanding (Fig. 14.12).

Acne scars are best treated with dermabrasion. In many instances, a full-face mechanical dermabrasion is not needed and may be excessive. To simplify the procedure, a medium-depth chemical peel can be performed over the entire face and the scar units can then be resurfaced with dermasanding or dermabrasion. An example is the patient with rolling scars and ice pick scars on the medial cheek. The deepest ice pick scars are treated with punch graft exchange, requiring a dermabrasion for further refinement. The dermabrasion is performed in the mid face only and the medium peel is used over the remaining areas for blending. With this combination, the peel is always performed first and then the dermabrasion follows after frosting has occurred (Fig. 14.13).

Botulinum Toxin and Fillers

Relaxing spasmodic muscle producing dynamic wrinkles with botulinum toxin is an adjunctive procedure that supplements medium peeling or resurfacing procedures (Fig. 14.14). De-innervating muscles causing frown lines, forehead wrinkles, and crow’s feet prior to peeling and resurfacing procedures will produce a better response than peeling or laser alone. This is because the dynamic wrinkles are put to rest and, as new dermal collagen is formed over the ensuing 4 to 6 months, there is minimal muscle movement to wear down the new collagen as the wrinkles are static. The immediate results appear better than with solely laser treatment as the dynamic folds that do not respond to laser or peel alone will improve, as will the fine lines and crepiness that is response to resurfacing. Similarly, botulinum toxin can be used around the lips to put the dynamic perioral lines to rest during the healing phase of the peel.

Adding volume to atrophic skin improves wrinkles in selective areas, thus making chemical peels more effective. For example, using collagen or hyaluronic acid for lip augmentation makes peeling and/or laser resurfacing for lip rhytids more successful because the increased volume allows a more conservative resurfacing to be effective and produces a more natural result than using a peel alone (Fig. 14.15). Fillers can be used before or after resurfacing depending on the agents used. The author finds long term filling agents (fat; Sculptra (Dermik Aesthetics, Berwyn, PA) or Radiesse (Bioform-Merz Aesthetics, San Mateo, CA)) are best used 1 month to 6 weeks prior to the resurfacing procedure (Fig. 14.16). Temporary fillers such as hyaluronic acid (Restylane (Medicis, Scottsdale, AZ) or Juvéderm (Allergan, Irvine, CA)), along with collagen (Cosmoderm (Allergan, Irvine, CA)), are used after full healing and swelling has resolved to fill out residual wrinkles.

If soft tissue fillers are used for deeper rhytids or facial volume replacement the procedures should be performed two weeks to one month prior to peeling or resurfacing. The deeper fillers in subcutaneous tissue and below are too deep to be affected by peel or laser, but superficial dermal fillers should be performed after resurfacing.

Combining procedures with peels thus can produce better results than peeling alone. The light and medium depth chemical peel has a pivotal position in bringing our other rejuvenative procedures together for better results than can monotherapy alone. The physician has the responsibility of choosing the correct modality to treat the appropriate skin condition, scar, dyschromia or skin growth. There are many agents available and these can be combined to produce the best of results.

Case Studies

Further Reading

Alt T. Occluded Baker-Gordon chemical peel: review and update. Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. 1989;15:980-993.

Alt TH. Technical aids for dermabrasion. Dermatologic Surgery. 2002;28:1115-1119.

Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The ablation of rhytides by chemical means: a preliminary report. Journal of the Florida Medical Association. 1961;48:451-454.

Brody HJ. Variations and comparisons in medium depth chemical peeling. Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. 1989;15:953-963.

Brody HJ. Trichloracetic acid application in chemical peeling: operative techniques. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1995;2(2):127-128.

Brody HJ. Complications of chemical resurfacing. Fundamentals of Cosmetic Surgery. Dermatologic Clinics. 2001;19(3):427-438.

Carruthers J, Carruthers A. Combining botulinum toxin injection and laser for facial rhytides. In: Coleman WP, Lawrence N, editors. Skin resurfacing. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1998:235-243.

Chiarello SE. Tumescent dermasanding with cryospraying: a new wrinkle on the treatment of rhytids. Dermatologic Surgery. 1996;22(7):601-610.

Coleman WP, Futrell JM. The glycolic acid trichloroacetic acid peel. Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. 1994;20:76-80.

Ditre CM, Griffin TD, Murphy GF, et al. Improvement of photodamaged skin with alphahydroxy acid (AHA): a clinical, histologic and ultrastructural study. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1996;34(2):187-195.

Donofrio LM. Structural lipoaugmentation: a parafacial technique. ournal of Dermatologic Surgery. 2000;26:1129-1134.

Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Archives of Dermatology. 1988;124:869-871.

Glogau RG. Chemical peeling and aging skin. Journal of Geriatric Dermatology. 1994;2(1):30-35.

Glogau R. Photoaging skin course. Washington, DC: Lecture at American Academy of Dermatology; 2004. February 13

Grimes PE. The safety and efficacy of salicylic acid chemical peels in darker racial-ethnic groups. Dermatologic Surgery. 1999;25:18-22.

Hanke CW, Bullock SS. Tretinoin and glycolic acid treatment regimens. Facial Plastic Surgery. 1995;11:9-14.

Harris DR, Noodleman FR. Combining manual dermasanding with low strength trichloroacetic acid to improve actinically injured skin. Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. 1994;20:436-442.

Hetter GP. An examination of the phenol-croton oil peel: Part I: Dissecting the formula. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2000;105:227-239. discussion 49–51

Hetter GP. An examination of the phenol-croton oil peel. Part IV: face peel results with different concentrations of phenol and croton oil. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2000;105:1061-1083. discussion 84–87

Lim HW, Naylor M, Honigran H, et al. American Academy of Dermatology consensus conference on UVA protection of sunscreens: summary and recommendation. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2001;44:505-508.

Lowe NJ, et al. Pigmentation of aging skin: evaluation and treatment. In: Lowe N, editor. Textbook of facial rejuvenation. London: Martin Dunitz; 2002:75-79.

McCollough EG, Langsdon PR. Chemical peeling with phenol. In: Roenigk H, Roenigk R, editors. Dermatologic surgery: principles and practice. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1989:997-1016.

Monheit GD. The Jessner’s + TCA peel: a medium depth chemical peel. Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. 1989;15:945-950.

Monheit GD. The Jessner’s-TCA peel. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America. 1994;2:21-27.

Monheit GD. Skin preparation: an essential step before chemical peeling or laser resurfacing. Cosmetic Dermatology. 1996;9:13-14.

Monheit GD. Chemical Peels. In: Rigel DS, editor. Photoaging. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004:189-190.

Monheit GD, Zeitouni NC. Skin resurfacing for photoaging: laser resurfacing versus chemical peeling. Cosmetic Dermatology. 1997;10:11-22.

Pollack SV. Some new injectable dermal filler materials: hylaform, restylane and artecol. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery. 1999;3(suppl 4):29.

Rubin MG. Manual of chemical peels: superficial and medium depth. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1995.

Stegman SJ. A comparative histologic study of the effects of three peeling agents and dermabrasion on normal and sun-damaged skin. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 1982;6:123-125.

Timbow K Obata H, Pathak M, Fitzpatrick T. Mechanism of depigmentation by hydroquinone. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1974;62:436-449.

Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Beasley KL. Rejuvenation of photoaged skin: 5 year results with IPL. Dermatologic Surgery. 2002;28:1115.

Witheiler DD, Lawrence N, Cox SE, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of Jessner’s solution and 35% trichloroacetic acid vs 5% fluorouracil in the treatment of widespread facial actinic keratoses. Dermatologic Surgery. 1997;23:191-196.