Clostridium difficile Colitis

Published on 26/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1410 times

146 Clostridium difficile Colitis

Antibiotic-associated colitis was recognized soon after antibiotics were introduced in the 1940s, but the cause was not known until 1978 with the original reports of the role of Clostridium difficile as the putative agent in nearly all cases of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis and 10% to 15% of those with uncomplicated antibiotic-associated diarrhea.1 Subsequent work has identified the pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment for this condition. The major challenges continue to be prevention and the management of patients with advanced disease, particularly those with ileus.

image Pathophysiology

There are six relevant issues:

2 Toxin production: C. difficile produces two toxins, designated toxin A and toxin B.5 Early studies implicated toxin A as the major cause of enteric toxin based on animal studies that showed florid colitis with injection of toxin A into bowel loops, but more recent studies establish that toxin B is critical for clinical expression.5 Most strains of C. difficile produce both toxins, but about 1% to 2% produce only toxin B.6
4 Epidemiology: C. difficile is relatively infrequent in ambulatory persons, but rates of colonization and disease are much higher as a result of exposure to the hospital environment.3 C. difficile now represents an important and potentially lethal nosocomial pathogen. Nursing homes are another setting in which there is clustering of vulnerable patients with high rates of antibiotic use where C. difficile may be endemic or epidemic.6 In the period 2001-2006, the NAP-1 strain emerged as an important epidemic agent of C. difficile in Canada, the United States, and Europe.4,6 This strain appears to be particularly virulent, with increased toxin production, mortality, treatment failure, and relapses.

image Clinical Signs and Symptoms

The typical presentation of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is watery diarrhea associated with cramps.2 Other common features are fecal leukocytes, endoscopy showing PMC or colitis, characteristic changes on computed tomography (CT) (thickened bowel restricted to the colon, often associated with ascites), fever, hypoalbuminemia, and leukocytosis, sometimes with a leukemoid reaction. Nearly all cases of CDI are associated with diarrhea, but occasional postoperative patients will not have this owing to ileus. The laboratory clue that best predicts this diagnosis and its severity is the white blood cell (WBC) count. The average is about 15,000 cells/mL, but it may be much higher with counts over 20,000 or even 50,000 cells/mL. This strongly supports the CDI diagnosis and predicts severe disease.8

image Treatment

Most important to treatment of CDI is discontinuing the implicated antibiotic. If there is a need for antibiotic treatment, select a drug that is unlikely to cause CDI (narrow-spectrum β-lactams, macrolides, aminoglycosides, antistaphylococcal drugs, tetracyclines; Table 146-2). The two favored drugs for treatment of CDI are metronidazole and vancomycin, both given by mouth.1,6,7 Metronidazole is often preferred because it is less expensive. Earlier studies showed it to work as well as vancomycin, but more recent trials show oral vancomycin is superior to metronidazole in seriously ill patients,8 defined as having a WBC over 15,000 cells/mL or elevated creatinine to 1.5 × baseline.6 Other markers of serious disease are albumin less than 2 mg/dL, admission to the ICU for CDI, pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) on endoscopy, or pancolitis on CT scan.9 Vancomycin is superior to metronidazole owing to pharmacology.8 All C. difficile are in the colon, so the challenge is getting an active drug to the colonic lumen. Vancomycin is not absorbed, so it all goes to the colon when given orally; metronidazole given orally is nearly completely absorbed, so it gets to the colon primarily through an inflamed colonic mucosa. Most patients improve with resolution of diarrhea in 3 to 5 days.1,7 Patients who are seriously ill (megacolon, septic shock, WBC >30,000/mL, lactate >5) and fail to respond to standard treatment should be considered for colectomy.9 The major indications are failure to respond to standard medical management and colonic perforation.

TABLE 146-2 Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection

Category Characteristics Treatment Recommendations
Mild-moderate WBC ≤ 15,000/mL and creatinine < 1.5 × baseline Metronidazole 500 mg PO 3×/d × 10-14 days
Severe WBC > 15,000/mL or creatinine > 1.5 × baseline Vancomycin, 125 mg 4×/d PO × 10-12 days
Severe and complicated Hypotension, shock, ileus or megacolon Vancomycin, 500 mg PO 4×/d by NG tube or by rectum, plus
Metronidazole 500 mg IV q 8 h
First relapse
Second relapse
  As above
Vancomycin, standard dose, then taper and/or pulse

PO, per os (orally); NG, nasogastric; WBC, white blood cell.

Adapted from Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:431-55.

image Prevention

Prevention of C. difficile includes: (1) surveillance to detect epidemics, (2) methods to prevent transmission of C. difficile, and (3) strategies to prevent unnecessary exposure to antibiotics, especially those most likely to induce CDI. For surveillance purposes, a rate of more than 4-10/10,000 patient days or 3-8/1000 admissions is regarded as excessive.6,10 For prevention of horizontal transmission, the key preventive measures are hand hygiene (use of soap and water in epidemics), barrier precautions, use of private rooms or cohorting of case patients until diarrhea resolves, and disinfection of environmental surfaces using sporicidal agents such as chlorine-containing agents. For hand hygiene, it is noted that soap and water in place of alcohol-based hygiene is recommended only in C. difficile epidemics. Patients with CDI should have their own commode and room (or be cohorted) until diarrhea resolves. The decision to stop barrier precautions or for patient transfer should not be based on stool studies for C. difficile, since there is no test to determine response to treatment. Avoidance of unnecessary antibiotic use with antibiotic stewardship programs is an important general practice principle but is especially important in controlling this complication. With epidemics as described by surveillance rates, it is important to define the associated antimicrobials. Published reports indicate control of epidemics through restraining or eliminating use of clindamycin, cefotaxime, or fluoroquinolones when these agents were implicated.6 Identification of the serotype of the implicated strain (e.g., NAP-1) may facilitate epidemiologic investigations in outbreaks. However, this requires stool culture for C. difficile, which most hospital labs do not usually do, and referral of the strain to a reference lab for serotyping.

image Complications

The major complications of C. difficile for the intensivist are toxic megacolon and sepsis.1,6,9 Toxic megacolon poses two problems: first is the severity of this complication per se, but also important is the inability to deliver vancomycin to the site of infection. Methods to deal with toxic megacolon are included in Table 146-2. For rectal instillations, the vancomycin is diluted with saline and delivered by enema, with a goal to get it to the right colon. Some patients will be severely ill with signs of sepsis, but bacteremia with enteric bacteria is rare, and C. difficile bacteremia as a complication of CDI has not been reported. C. difficile perforation has been reported as a complication of megacolon but is unusual. Most seriously ill patients respond to standard management of sepsis, with particular attention to rehydration, while attempting to control disease with oral vancomycin and IV metronidazole.

Key Points

Annotated References

Bartlett JG. Narrative review: the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:758-764.

A review of CDI including the recent developments with the NAP-1 strain.

Bartlett JG. Clinical practice. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:334-339.

Review of antibiotic-associated diarrhea—its cause and management. Note that CDI accounts for only 15% to 20% of cases.

McFarland LV, Mulligan ME, Kwok RY, Stamm WE. Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:204-210.

This is a classic paper showing that stool carriage rates of C. difficile in outpatients is only 1% to 2%, but the risk for acquisition increases to 25% to 30% with hospitalization.

McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens, RCJr, Kazakova SV, et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2433-2441.

There has been recognition of an epidemic of CDI in North America and Europe starting in the period 2000-04. This is commonly attributed to the NAP-1 strain that causes more disease, more serious disease, disease that is often refractory to therapy, and disease likely to relapse.

Lyras D, O’Connor JR, Howarth PM, Sambol SP, Carter GP, et al. Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile. Nature. 2009;458:1176-1179.

The role of toxin B as an essential component of the pathophysiology of CDI.

Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431-455.

The 2010 guidelines for management of CDI. This is the basis for recommendations given here for treatment and infection control.

Lowy I, Molrine DC, Leav BA, Blair BM, Baxter R. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies against Clostridium difficile toxins. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:197-205.

This report showed humanized monoclonal antibodies to C. difficile toxins A and B protected against relapse. This provides further evidence for an important role in humoral response as an important factor in protection against CDI.

Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB. A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:302-307.

A therapeutic trial that showed metronidazole and oral vancomycin were comparable for mild disease, but vancomycin was clearly superior for serious disease.

Lamontagne F, Labbé AC, Haeck O, Lesur O, Lalancette M, et al. Impact of emergency colectomy on survival of patients with fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis during an epidemic caused by a hypervirulent strain. Ann Surg. 2007;133:718-720.

A large experience with severe CDI is reviewed showing risks for lethal outcome, including a WBC over 50,000, age older than 75 years, immunosuppression, and serum lactate above 5. In this series, colectomy was associated with a substantial benefit, but the reported experience shows an operative mortality rate ranging from 25% to 75%.

McDonald LC, Coignard B, Dubberke E, Song X, Horan T, et al. Recommendations for surveillance of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:140-145.

Recommendations for surveillance for CDI to determine if rates are excessive compared to national norms. Excessive rates imply the need to impose stringent infection control and possibly antibiotic restrictions.

References

1 Bartlett JG. Narrative review: the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:758-764.

2 Bartlett JG. Clinical practice. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:334-339.

3 McFarland LV, Mulligan ME, Kwok RY, Stamm WE. Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:204-210.

4 McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RCJr, Kazakova SV, et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2433-2441.

5 Lyras D, O’Connor JR, Howarth PM, Sambol SP, Carter GP, et al. Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile. Nature. 2009;458:1176-1179.

6 Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431-455.

7 Lowy I, Molrine DC, Leav BA, Blair BM, Baxter R. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies against Clostridium difficile toxins. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:197-205.

8 Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB. A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:302-307.

9 Lamontagne F, Labbé AC, Haeck O, Lesur O, Lalancette M, et al. Impact of emergency colectomy on survival of patients with fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis during an epidemic caused by a hypervirulent strain. Ann Surg. 2007;133:718-720.

10 McDonald LC, Coignard B, Dubberke E, Song X, Horan T, et al. Recommendations for surveillance of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:140-145.