Clinical Evaluation for Possible Child Abuse

Published on 10/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1770 times

chapter 21 Clinical Evaluation for Possible Child Abuse

Child maltreatment is common but often unrecognized in pediatric practice. Though larger centers typically benefit from having a hospital-based child protection team, smaller communities rely on community physicians to assess children suspected of having been abused. This chapter outlines examination and documentation techniques to help you perform a competent assessment of a child who may have been abused.

The goal of this chapter is not to help you determine the significance of injuries in children, and it is not to provide an in-depth review of forensic issues. When in doubt about the significance of a finding, it is always best to consult a colleague experienced in the field of child abuse.

Because the issues vary greatly based on whether you are being asked to see a child for sexual abuse, physical abuse, or neglect, this chapter will first present general principles and revisit each section of the assessment individually, with emphasis on sexual abuse, physical abuse, and neglect.

Mandated Reporting

First and foremost, recognize your duty to report all cases of suspected maltreatment. Become familiar with your local child protection laws, and understand your professional duty in relation to those laws.

Although legislation varies from state to state and province to province, the United States and all Canadian jurisdictions have legislation mandating that suspected child maltreatment be reported to a child welfare authority or other body, or both, as dictated by local legislation. (For simplicity, child welfare authority will be used in this chapter to encompass any body to which you are mandated to report.) Definitions of child and of reportable circumstances vary. In some jurisdictions, health professionals are held to a higher standard of duty than lay persons, and the failure of health professionals to report suspicions of maltreatment can lead to fines, charges, or even imprisonment.

Topics typically addressed by child welfare legislation usually include:

Not all jurisdictions recognize all of these categories, hence the need to be familiar with local laws.

When children make a disclosure, they rarely lie about abuse. Although a few may try to manipulate others by making false allegations, it is not your role to judge the facts being presented. Believe children when they make disclosures, and act accordingly.

If a child discloses abuse to you, it is a sign of trust. One of the most therapeutic interventions you can undertake is to believe the child, be nonjudgmental, and ensure the child’s safety by reporting your concerns to a child welfare authority. To help that agency determine its course of action, ask about the relationship of the alleged perpetrator to the victim, and find out what access he or she currently has to the victim or to other children.

Sometimes when parents or caregivers report a suspicion of abuse, they may be unwilling to contact the appropriate authorities to report their concern. They may give many reasons for their refusal, but once you believe a child is in need of protection, you are mandated to report your concerns, regardless of patient confidentiality or parent/patient wishes about confidentiality. Sometimes, older children/youth may disclose abuse to you but ask you not to report it. Again, your duty is to report the concerns, despite the request. Explain the reasons behind your duty to report, and explain to the child that you are making the concerns known to help the child. Find out why the child does not want you to report and address these concerns. For example, a patient may feel that reporting the abuse may be risking harm upon the return home. In such cases, your report to the agency should address this concern, and a plan should be put in place to ensure the child’s safety after your report.

Because it is important to maintain a relationship of trust with older patients, make sure they understand early in your clinical meeting the limits of patient-doctor confidentiality. Make them aware that any disclosure of harm or potential harm by someone else can mandate a report of suspected maltreatment.

If you’re unsure about whether a situation is reportable, call your local child welfare authority. You can present the scenario anonymously and ask whether or not the situation is reportable.

Sometimes families raise concerns of maltreatment, which may not, in your view, be well founded. Unfortunately, such situations often occur repeatedly when disputes over custody and access arise in the course of a parental separation. Although you may be tempted to distance yourself from such difficult situations, you must always act in the best interest of the child and facilitate a report of suspected abuse if the parent seeks help.

Even though you may feel that you are being asked to take sides in a parental dispute, remember, you are not a mediator, investigator, counselor, or arbiter. Your role is simply to identify and report suspected child maltreatment and to ensure the family is supported during this time. Others will determine whether the concerns are well founded. If, after listening to a parent’s concern and examining the child, you are unable to rule out abuse, it is best to make sure that a child welfare agency is made aware of your concerns. If your assessment does not support an abusive situation, and you have no concerns about abuse, you can still be helpful to the family by offering to help support the concerned parent in his or her reporting of the situation. Provide the parent with the telephone number to the local child welfare authority and offer to refer the family to a professional who can help them cope.

Unless a child is referred to you for examination by a child welfare agency, never assume that another party (i.e., a parent, teacher, or police officer) has already reported the situation. You cannot discharge your duty to report by assuming that someone else has already reported similar concerns.

The First Few Moments of the Meeting

As part of the informed consent process, advise caregivers that your notes, photographs, and any reports generated as part of your assessment are likely to be requested or subpoenaed by the involved child welfare agency. If a caregiver refuses any of the above aspects, you must respect his or her choice. If you believe that your assessment is incomplete because of, for example, a parent’s refusal to have blood work performed, report such information to the involved child welfare agency as part of your concern about the child’s safety. They may be able to intervene and find a way to ensure that a complete assessment is done.

Not all caregivers are comfortable discussing their concerns in front of their children. Conversely, some are too eager to talk and may voice concerns inappropriately in front of their young children. For this reason, a colleague such as a nurse or social worker should ideally be available to stay and build rapport with the child while you document the history. This serves three purposes: It prepares the child for the examination and helps ease tension while allowing parents to speak more freely about their concerns. While awaiting the examination, the nurse or social worker can also familiarize the child with the process by discussing it, looking at medical instruments, and showing diagrams of the various positions the child may be asked to assume during the exam. They can also stay during the child’s examination, should the child and family allow it, and ease the transition from play to examination.

Obtaining the History

Child protection cases often make for difficult history-taking. Communicating with potentially abusive or neglectful parents may be one of the most difficult tasks you will undertake. You may feel angry, frustrated, or may lack empathy for “people who do such things to their children.” But remember, you are seeing only part of the picture, and that there often is more to the situation than meets the eye. Communication with abusive or neglectful parents may be very difficult, for various reasons. But once you break through the surface, you may discover that they are not the terrible people you may have imagined. In fact, they are often desperate people with poor coping skills and resources.

Our traditional teaching emphasizes that we should always believe caregivers because they know their child so well. This is not always the case in suspected child abuse, where caregivers commonly fabricate, amplify, alter or omit details—a critical issue when you want to provide an objective assessment.

Parents or caregivers may have hidden agendas—for example, custody and access battles, secondary financial gain, or mental illness that can lead to false histories. In addition, although you may be unaware of it, the historian on whom you are relying for information may, in fact, turn out to be the perpetrator and may therefore fabricate a history to conceal the nature of the injuries he or she has caused. In pediatric condition falsification (usually seen as part of Munchausen syndrome by proxy), caregivers may induce or fabricate symptoms to intentionally mislead you. Although it is difficult and counterintuitive to do, remember that the historian may be lying—sometimes quite convincingly.

The history may be provided by the patient, a parent, a caregiver, a child protection worker, or some combination. While some children prefer to have a parent or caregiver present during history taking, others may prefer to be alone with you. Always give the older child or youth a choice of who will be present during the interview. Remember, situations may arise which are not conducive to the child being open and comfortable during the interview. For instance, the adult accompanying the child for examination may be the perpetrator of the abuse or may choose to protect the alleged perpetrator and, therefore, not be supportive of the child.

At times, especially in cases of injuries, the person alleged to have been present at the time of injury may not be present during the assessment. Make reasonable efforts to obtain the information from direct witnesses and to avoid obtaining potentially invalid or partially correct information from people providing it on a third-hand basis. Making telephone calls or inviting the person who was there when the events occurred to attend the assessment are two ways through which you can exercise due diligence, as long as you have the child’s guardian’s permission to do so.

An alleged perpetrator may decline your invitation to talk, especially if he or she has been advised by a lawyer not to discuss the case with anyone. Although it is not ideal, if you believe that a third party to whom you do not have access is likely to have information that could be useful to your assessment, you can ask the involved child welfare worker to ask some questions for you. Provide a list of your questions, so that the child welfare worker can address them while interviewing the involved person. The information can then be relayed back to you for assessment.

Abuse investigators are very concerned about the validity of disclosures. Ideally they do not want anyone to speak to children about the abuse allegations before a professional forensic interviewer does so. This helps ensure that the child does not become confused and that no one has an opportunity to coach or be seen as possibly having coached a child to make statements that might otherwise not have been made. Deferring an examination until after the child has been interviewed by professionals will prevent someone from later claiming that elements of the patient’s disclosure were introduced or modified by the medical history or physical examination. Exceptions can be made to this rule of thumb, depending on the situation. When symptoms are present or when there is a high likelihood of pregnancy or sexually transmitted infection (STI), the examination should be done more urgently, even if the child has not been interviewed by forensic interviewers. Calling the involved child welfare authority and explaining the urgency can help expedite the interview and allow for prompt medical care. Inability to schedule a timely interview should not detract from your duty to provide prompt medically-indicated care.

Formulating questions

At the time of your examination, especially when the child has not yet been formally interviewed by a forensic interviewer, use open-ended questions only. Avoid making references to possible mechanisms of injury or perpetrators. If you ask only the questions required for medical care, you will avoid the trap of asking what could be misconstrued as leading questions. Although it feels natural to do so, you must remember that your role is to treat injuries and document them, not to investigate the details and circumstances of their occurrence. It takes practice to use such non-leading questioning and if you can’t get good information, don’t worry. Focus on identifying and treating injuries. Someone else, namely the forensic interviewer, will get historical details from the child at a later time.

If a child makes a spontaneous disclosure during your assessment, document the context in which this occurred. Record both your own and the child’s statements, verbatim. This will minimize any future dispute over the validity of the history. For instance, such documentation could take the following form:

The timely, verbatim documentation of conversations and their context has invaluable credibility. In this example, without knowing any details of the case, anyone will realize that the disclosure was not sought out or coerced and that it came about spontaneously during the physical examination. Besides, given that even the most vivid memories fade, such documentation will be invaluable a few years later, in case you need to attend legal proceedings about the case.

Physical Examination

Details of the physical examination for each situation will be covered individually in the Examination for Sexual Abuse and Physical Abuse and Neglect sections of this chapter.

Obtaining Pertinent History

The Student Consult Web site offers an important section on the triage of referrals, the need for a physical examination, and issues to consider in the scheduling of an assessment.

Formulating questions for history of present illness

For several reasons, many families do not use proper terminology for genitalia with their children. This can lead to misunderstandings. Therefore, you must find out whether the child uses special terms to describe their genitalia (e.g., “bird,” “flower,” “wiener”). You can ask a parent or caregiver at an appropriate time in the history process. If however, the child is not accompanied by someone who would know such details, you can ask the child. Never assume a child knows the proper terminology to describe their genitalia and, similarly, do not assume that you know what the child means when he or she makes a statement such as “He touched my noonoo.” Whereas going along with a child or parent’s euphemism for genitalia may be reasonable in a routine office visit, it is not acceptable when child abuse is suspected. There must be no confusion about what is being discussed. If you encounter a vague euphemism, ask the child to clarify it. Your conversation can be as follows:

Child: “He hurt my noonoo.”
Physician: “Hmmm, I’m not sure I know exactly what you mean when you say noonoo, do you know another word for it?”
Child: “You know, my privates!”
Physician: “Oh, I see. Just to be sure I’m thinking of the right privates, “Can you show me where your noonoo is?”
Child: “There, silly!”

If a child protection agency has already interviewed the child, you should be able to obtain a relevant history to guide the physical examination from the child protection worker or the child’s parent or caregiver. When this is not possible, be very careful about how you ask questions to a child, so as not to be perceived to have led the child to disclose what he or she said. Take scrupulous notes. The following conversation illustrates an inappropriate questioning technique. The doctor is leading the child to make statements that might otherwise not have been made:

Child: “He put his stick in my bird.”
Physician: “Do you mean his penis?”
Child: “Yes.”
Physician: “Is your bird your vagina?”
Child: “Uh-huh”
Physician: “Did it hurt?”
Child: “Yeah.”
Physician: “Did he put it in your mouth?”
Child: “Yes.”
Physician: “How about your bum?”

A better way is simply to indicate your willingness to hear more. Do your best not to look or sound shocked or distressed; it may discourage the child from telling you more. Just be interested in what the child has to say. A child who is ready and willing to disclose will give you information without your needing to ask many questions. The following example illustrates a better way to encourage the child to talk more:

Child: “He put his stick in my mouth.”
Physician: “In your mouth?”
Child: “Yeah and sometimes my bird too.”
Physician: “Hmmm. What’s that like?”
Child: “Kinda funny ’cause it gets all big and it stands up.”
Physician: “And how does that feel when that happens?”
Child: “Goodish badish.”
Physician: “Really… anything else?”
Child: “Kinda wet and goopy too.”
Physician: “I see…”
Child: “But that’s okay—we use Kleenex on the night table to clean up.”

Though the child’s disclosure is not clear (we don’t know what the stick or the bird are), you have enough information to suspect inappropriate sexual contact with ejaculation. Without having led the child, there is now enough reason to consider testing for STIs and to look for sequelae of penetrating genital trauma. If you have not already done so, or if you have not succeeded in doing so, clarification of the terms stick and bird will be done by child welfare workers when they interview the child.

Remember, young children often use terminology to which they can relate to describe acts that are developmentally beyond their understanding and for which they lack the proper terminology. A 6-year-old child who discloses that his cousin “peed in (his) mouth” may in fact be describing ejaculation. At this age, peeing may be the only function a boy knows for a penis. Not knowing how to describe semen, the child may use the word pee because it represents the only experiential knowledge he possesses for a liquid substance coming from a penis. It is important to realize that the child is not lying about what happened but rather is explaining it, in his own words. Your knowledge of child development can be most important in explaining this concept to investigators who may have no experience with young children or knowledge of child development.

Physical Examination

Many children referred for evaluation of possible abuse are, understandably, reluctant to be examined. This is particularly true in the case of older female sexual abuse victims who may be asked to undergo an examination by a male physician.

A child’s refusal to be examined may not please some parents who may be very assertive and may demand that the child be examined against her wishes. Faced with such a situation, remember that your primary responsibility is to maintain the patient’s well-being. As long as there is no medical urgency, if a child is reluctant to be examined, it is better to delay the examination or cancel it altogether rather than force a child to be examined against his or her will. Genital examinations under anesthesia should be done for undiagnosed ongoing bleeding or for foreign body removal only. It is unacceptable to perform such an invasive procedure simply to assess the external genitalia in the absence of a serious disease or symptoms.

Give praise and congratulations to the child for having had the courage to say “No” to the examination, to speak up for oneself and protect his or her privacy. Such an approach not only respects the young patient’s autonomy but also reinforces the development of good boundaries while helping the child build positive self-esteem and self-worth.

Whether for acute or historical sexual abuse, it can be difficult to conduct an examination by yourself. If possible, have someone assist you. You will find this most helpful for positioning, labial traction, collection of swabs, and photography. For cases of possible sexual abuse, you should have additional materials on hand, including:

The Student Consult Web site offers a section on understanding fundamental anogenital anatomy in children, a concept that must be firmly grasped before you attempt any physical examination. It includes many additional pictures pertaining to the different configurations a normal hymen can have, to help you understand its importance in the context of an examination for sexual abuse.

Examination for Sexual Abuse

The Student Consult Web site offers a section on understanding fundamental anogenital anatomy in children, a concept that must be firmly grasped before you attempt any physical examination. It includes many additional pictures pertaining to the different configurations a normal hymen can have, to help you understand its importance in the context of an examination for sexual abuse. Physical examination for possible evidence of sexual abuse should include all areas of the body. Performing the genital examination should be done last and as part of a complete physical examination only. This allows the child time to become comfortable with the examiner and diverts the focus from the genitalia as the only area of interest.

In addition to yourself and the patient, it is prudent to have a second examiner or other health care professional present when you perform the genital examination. If no other healthcare professional is available, a person of the child’s choosing may be appropriate. This will help ensure that none of your actions are misinterpreted as inappropriate sexual touching. While the protocol of having a chaperone present protects you medicolegally, recognize the sensitive nature of examining the genitals of a child who may have been sexually abused. Besides, this third person may be a great source of support for the child during the examination.

In girls, the examination for possible sexual abuse is limited to the assessment of the external genital structures only. It is not the same as a gynecologic examination, which is an internal examination. For information on performing a gynecologic examination, see Chapter 18.

In cases of historical sexual abuse, the physical examination will most likely be normal. With more recent contact, however, obvious or subtle injuries may be found. Look for and document the presence of abrasions, irritation, ecchymoses, lacerations, edema, or scarring. Only in cases of brisk or undiagnosed vaginal bleeding should you need to perform an internal, speculum exam on a prepubertal or sexually inexperienced girl. Most often, this will require an examination under anesthesia, and you should enlist the help of a gynecologist or general surgeon.

Genital Examination

To ensure quality records and allow for possible future peer review, document each step of the examination with photographs or video, if possible (see notes on photography).

For boys, systematically inspect the foreskin, penis, testicles, perineum, and anus. If the foreskin is retractable, examine the ventral frenulum of the foreskin for any evidence of trauma. Inspect the urethra, if visible, for trauma or discharge. Do not forcibly retract the foreskin if phimosis is present. Palpate the testicles to detect their presence as well as any tenderness, mass, or hematoma.

For girls, all external structures must be inspected. The hymen, by virtue of its position, is less readily inspected. It is often folded upon itself, or its edges may adhere to one another, making visualization of the edges difficult. Accurate assessment of the genitalia with good visualization of the hymen can be done in three steps that use several examination positions and techniques. As part of the examination of the hymen, document its shape and integrity. The Student Consult Web site includes pictures of the various hymenal configurations.

Do not measure transverse hymenal and anal diameters; such measurements lack specificity for sexual abuse.

Step 1: Frog-leg position with lateral traction of the labia majora

The supine frog-leg position (Fig. 21–4) is an ideal initial position to visualize the external structures of the vulva and provide an initial view of the hymen. This position should be used for visualization of the female genitalia during well-child visits, when a more in-depth look at the hymen is not required. This position has the advantage of being less invasive and more natural, helping the patient relax. It can be used on an examination table or, for the insecure younger patient, on a parent’s lap. In this position, the labia majora usually separate automatically, exposing the introitus. Gentle lateral traction of the labia majora can help visualize the labia minora, clitoris, posterior fourchette, and hymen.

image

FIGURE 21–4 Supine frog-leg position.

(From McCann JJ, Kerns DL: The Anatomy of Child and Adolescent Sexual Abuse: A CD-ROM Atlas/Reference, Intercorp Inc., 1999)

Step 2: Frog-leg position with downward traction of the labia majora

Downward labial traction allows for better assessment of the hymen and vestibule while minimizing the risk of tearing the posterior fourchette. Grasp the labia majora bilaterally between your thumb and forefinger, and gently pull both labia toward you in a downward and slightly outward direction. As long as both labia are pulled in tandem and in the same direction, there is little risk of discomfort or injury. This maneuver creates a tunnel which elongates the vestibule and stretches the hymen, allowing its edges to separate. Inferior labial traction is often all that is necessary to separate adherent hymenal edges. The perspective of the tunnel created by traction can be changed by pulling the labia in tandem anteriorly, laterally, or posteriorly.

Figure 21–5 illustrates the labial traction and retraction techniques and the difference in hymenal visualization that they offer.

image

FIGURE 21–5 A, Lateral labial traction. B, Downward labial traction alters the soft tissue anatomy to offer a different view of the hymen.

(Adapted from McCann JJ, Kerns DL: The Anatomy of Child and Adolescent Sexual Abuse: A CD-ROM Atlas/Reference, Intercorp Inc., 1999)

If the labial traction technique does not allow the edges of the hymen to separate easily, apply a few drops of warm water to the hymen with a dropper or syringe. This should not be painful. The resulting accumulation of water on the hymen will serve to float its edges, allowing you to see them more clearly.

Step 3: Prone knee-chest position

Once the hymen and other genital structures have been identified and examined, if any abnormality is suspected, you must examine them again with the child in the prone knee-chest position (Fig. 21–6). This is especially important when suspicious findings are identified with the child in the supine frog-leg position. The hymen may look abnormal in the supine position because of the effects of gravity on the anterior vaginal wall and to the adherence of mucosal surfaces. By turning the patient into the prone knee-chest position, the effects of gravity are reversed by pulling the posterior hymenal edge and anterior vaginal wall in the opposite direction. If they are real, the same defect(s) seen in the supine position should be visible with the child in the prone knee-chest position. Findings that disappear indicate positional changes in the hymen’s appearance and are not true abnormalities.

image

FIGURE 21–6 The knee-chest position.

(From McCann JJ, Kerns DL: The Anatomy of Child and Adolescent Sexual Abuse: A CD-ROM Atlas/Reference, Intercorp Inc., 1999)

To visualize the hymen with the child in this position, place your thumbs lateral to the area of the posterior fourchette, with the palms of your hands on the patient’s buttocks. With your thumbs, gently lift the tissues superiorly and laterally, in effect, lifting the posterior vaginal wall against gravity (Fig. 21–7). Using this technique, the posterior hymen should be clearly visible, smoothed out by the effects of gravity. Figure 21–8 demonstrates the striking conformational change in the hymen when the patient is changed from the supine frog-leg position to the prone knee-chest position.

image

FIGURE 21–7 Examination of the hymen in the knee-chest position.

(From McCann JJ, Kerns DL: The Anatomy of Child and Adolescent Sexual Abuse: A CD-ROM Atlas/Reference, Intercorp Inc., 1999)

image

FIGURE 21–8 Difference in the appearance of the hymen in the same patient, using the (A) supine frog-leg position and (B) knee-chest position.

(Adapted from McCann JJ, Kerns DL: The Anatomy of Child and Adolescent Sexual Abuse: A CD-ROM Atlas/Reference, Intercorp Inc., 1999)

The prone knee-chest position also offers an ideal opportunity to visualize the anus. The lateral knee-chest position is also suitable for adequately exposing the anus, although it requires more manipulation of the buttocks by the examiner.

Specialized techniques for examining the postpubertal patient

The thick redundant hymen, typical of postpubertal females, is much more difficult to assess adequately. Though labial traction may help, it is usually insufficient. Using a moistened swab and a Foley catheter are two techniques that may be useful to allow clearer visualization of the posterior rim of the hymen. Another method, the blue balloon technique, can be used to increase contrast between tissue edges.

image

FIGURE 21–9 Use of a swab to examine the continuity of the posterior hymen. Note the hymenal cleft identified by the swab and the presence of a Foley catheter to stretch the hymen.

(From McCann JJ, Kerns DL: The Anatomy of Child and Adolescent Sexual Abuse: A CD-ROM Atlas/Reference, Intercorp Inc., 1999)

Documentation in sexual abuse cases

Be careful how you interpret genital examination findings. If you document a normal genital examination, you can reassure the patient and child welfare authorities that everything appears normal. Many people still do not understand that a normal physical examination does not mean nothing happened. Therefore, accompany your reassurance with a statement that the presence of a normal physical examination neither refutes nor supports a disclosure of sexual abuse. Be sure to point out that the medical history and disclosures are more important than the physical examination in establishing whether abuse occurred.

If you feel that the physical examination was abnormal, it is safest and best to refer the patient to a colleague with more experience in child sexual abuse for further assessment. Do not imply with certainty that a finding represents trauma from sexual abuse. It is better to state that there is a finding that warrants further evaluation. Most tertiary pediatric centers have child maltreatment experts who can provide a valuable second opinion.

Case Histories

Case History 1

History. Mrs. MacLeod arrives in your office, very upset. She booked one of your “urgent” spots at the end of the day on a Friday afternoon. When you enter the room, she gets to her feet and starts telling you how grateful she is that you could see her and her daughter, 6-year-old Chelsea, so fast. In the same breath, she starts telling you that Chelsea just told her that her father, whose house she returned from that morning, had touched her bird and that it hurt. She goes on to say “I knew it, I just knew that that man couldn’t be trusted; you know we separated because of his porn addiction. I need you to examine her; I just know the creep’s done something—whatever it takes, an internal exam, whatever, just do it; I want him out of her life, now!” Meanwhile, Chelsea looks at you from the corner of her eyes, quiet and anxious-looking.

Strategies

In this situation, the concern is obviously about sexual abuse. However, there are many lacking details, details that would help you decide how to go about your assessment. Chelsea’s mother is, however, not in any position to think about things clearly at this time. She needs to be calmed and to be provided with guidance. Although she loves her daughter and wants to protect her, Mrs. MacLeod is tangled up in her emotions, which may hinder her ability to be rational in her approach. On the other hand, Chelsea, a very young child, does not have any control over the situation and is at the mercy of her mother’s reactions. It is your job, as her pediatrician, to ensure that she feels safe and comfortable and to assess whether or not she requires a physical examination and is in need of protection from her father.

Your approach should be to interrupt Chelsea’s mother’s unfiltered disclosure of information and to redirect her attention to Chelsea’s needs. Suggest taking a moment to find a quiet place for Chelsea to play while you talk to Mrs. MacLeod alone. This should suffice to stop Chelsea’s mother from making inappropriate comments about Chelsea’s father in the child’s presence.

Because Chelsea’s mother is overwhelmed with the new information she has to deal with, take the lead in asking questions about the alleged event and surrounding circumstances. This will ensure that you set the tone and agenda for your discussion and will allow you to get the information you need.

Explain your train of thought to Chelsea’s mother. Explain that there is a medical element that you can address and there is a child protection element, which you can help facilitate, and that you need to understand the sequence of events and the details of Chelsea’s disclosure to help you decide on the best course of action. Explain your duty to report and the limits of confidentiality. Finally, give details as to how you will go about deciding whether or not Chelsea needs to be examined.

Taking the time to make things clear and explain the overall process will help Mrs. MacLeod relax and trust you, thus allowing you to go about your history-taking, uninterrupted. As soon as it is appropriate in the history, bring Chelsea back into your examination room. This will allow her to familiarize herself with the environment, stay close to her mother for support, and interact with you before any attempt at physical examination, if that is warranted.

Once you have gathered all of the necessary information, decide on whether or not you feel that Chelsea needs protection from her father. If you do not feel there is any concern, facilitate Mrs. MacLeod’s reporting of her concerns to a child welfare authority. If, however, you share her concerns or if you are uncertain about the whole situation, report it yourself. In either case, make a plan for follow-up, outline how Mrs. MacLeod can be supportive to Chelsea, encourage her to seek counseling or support for herself, and reassess the situation at a later date.

Assessing Children for Physical Abuse and Neglect

Formulating questions

As with sexual abuse, keep the questions as open-ended as possible. Of course, not all open-ended questions will lead to clear answers. Do not feel that it is your responsibility to extract a clear disclosure about the nature of the child’s injuries. Your role is to document injuries, obtain a medical history, determine whether a medical condition might explain the findings, and interpret the findings.

To increase the likelihood that a caregiver will be cooperative and informative during history taking, avoid accusatory tones. If an injury that is almost certainly abusive is found, stating, “Billy is seriously injured; tell me about it” is far better than “Who did this to Billy?” or “What happened here?”

Similarly, questions about mechanisms of injury should not be leading or suggest the mechanism you have in mind. For instance, when assessing a child with a spiral fracture of the femur, do not ask, “Did his leg twist when he fell?” It’s better to use a more open statement like, “Tell me how his body moved during the fall”—being careful that your style of questioning avoids suggesting mechanisms of injury to caregivers who might otherwise not be very good at covering up a lie.

Even with children, good open-ended questions will help you obtain better information. When asking about injuries, start with a very broad statement expressing interest without sounding like an investigator. For example:

Physician: What’s this?”
Child: “A bruise.”
Physician: “How did you get it?”
Child: “It’s from the slipper.”
Physician: “What do you mean?”
Child: You know, when I pee in my bed.”

Functional Inquiry

Rule out mimics of physical abuse or neglect through a good functional inquiry. Listed below are a few examples of symptoms that may suggest a medical problem worth considering.

Bruising may be explained by congenital or acquired bleeding disorders. These could be suggested by a personal or family history of significant bleeding, for example, hemorrhage following neonatal circumcision or tooth extractions, epistaxis, gingival bleeding, hematochezia or hematemesis, heavy maternal menses, or postpartum hemorrhage.

What may appear to be a healing fracture can, in fact, be related to other bone pathology leading to periostitis (e.g., Caffey disease). This may present with a history of fever, malaise, bone pain, or preceding vague illness.

Developmental delays, failure to thrive, long-standing macrocephaly, feeding difficulties, and sudden collapse during an intercurrent illness can be clues to rare metabolic disorders. These may present with “unexplained” subdural hemorrhages and encephalopathy that can mimic abusive head trauma.

Finally, fever, pain, or a toxic appearance may suggest skin infections with herpes or staphylococcus, which can cause bullous lesions that mimic burns.

Nutrition

The dietary history is important, especially in infants or young children in whom neglect is suspected. When children are critically ill (e.g., from abusive head trauma), precise timing of the last feed may yield clues as to when the child was last well (children who are unwell do not usually feed normally). In addition, evaluating the diet can reveal a lack of dietary supplementation with vitamins C, D, and K, which can lead to scurvy, rickets, or coagulopathy, respectively. In cases of vitamins C and D deficiencies, radiographic features may be mistaken for healing metaphyseal fractures.

Nutrition is also important when there are concerns about parent-child attachment. Similarly, when neglect is suspected, pay close attention to the child’s caloric intake and try to determine whether the reported intake should be sufficient to meet growth and development needs. The dietary history may reveal a parent’s lack of knowledge about normal nutrition, which could explain failure to thrive. Document precisely what foods are given, at what frequency and in what amounts. This may help you identify inconsistencies between the history and clinical picture. For example, a mother who claims that her otherwise well, severely underweight 2-month-old drinks 8 ounces of formula every 3 hours, is unlikely to be reporting his intake accurately.

Ask about the child’s appetite and feeding behavior. Most caregivers can readily describe when they feed their infant and how much the baby drinks. The inability to describe such basic information should raise concerns about the home environment and about the reliability of the reported feeding schedule. Find out whether the child asks to be fed or whether he or she wakes at night for feeding. How does the baby indicate that he or she is hungry or full? Does the baby spit up, vomit, cough, gag, or appear in pain after feeds? Does milk dribble from the mouth during feeds? In formula-fed infants, find out how the formula is diluted or mixed; it may explain an otherwise unexplained growth problem if preparation has resulted in the administration of calorie-poor formula.

The most reliable way to obtain independent valid information about a child’s feeding habits is to observe them in the hospital. Document the caregivers’ ability to mix formula properly. Observe the child’s ability to feed as well as the caregiver’s technique. Pay close attention to how the child interacts with the parents and the child’s behavior. Children who are chronically malnourished may develop secondary anorexia and not give any hunger cues. Hospital staff members should have no difficulty identifying pathologic feeding behavior and practices that could explain a child’s failure to thrive.

Review the child’s growth charts from all possible sources and collate them into one. These may yield graphic evidence of long-standing problems that may have been underestimated or missed.

Physical examination for suspected physical abuse

Examination for physical abuse should follow the same principle as for sexual abuse; the examination should be complete and should not focus only on one area of the body. Especially in cases of neglect, a thorough examination may identify previously unaddressed health issues in need of management. Physical examination alone does not suffice when physical abuse is suspected in pre-verbal children (generally those under the age of 2 or 3 years). Additional investigations in the form of a skeletal survey, nuclear bone scintigraphy, head imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or computed tomography [CT]) and dilated funduscopic examination by an ophthalmologist, are strongly recommended. In older children, occult injuries are less likely to be missed and physical examinations alone may suffice to guide further management. In all children, however, the purpose of the examination is to document bruises, scars, growth parameters, and general health. Height, weight, and head circumference should be measured in all children since they may provide helpful insight into past health.

Your general examination should pay special attention to the musculoskeletal system, looking for signs of old, current, or evolving injury. Observe the child at rest and at play to detect any deformity. You may see callus on the ribs of thin children. Pay attention to any decreased range of movement or guarding of a limb. Palpate all limbs and body surfaces for tenderness or swelling. Painful swelling in the soft tissues may herald a developing bruise which may need reassessment in a few days. Alternatively, apparent swelling or fullness may be suggestive of bony callus formation from an older undetected fracture.

Bruises are often hidden in areas typically covered by clothing so you must visualize all the skin. This includes moving the hair to visualize the scalp and ears as well as deliberately looking at skin areas that are often covered. Although you should not be coercive, remember that a child who is hesitant to let you examine a certain body part (i.e., legs, back) may be trying to hide injuries.

Sometimes, bruising may not be easily differentiated from slate grey patches (so-called Mongolian spots), café-au-lait spots, or other pigmented birthmarks. Sometimes, children who play with markers may have discolored skin which can be mistaken for bruising. A few different approaches to help you identify the true nature of a lesion. Try rubbing the lesion with an alcohol pad; marker or other dyes will likely rub off immediately. palpate all lesions to apply pressure to them. Alternatively, examine the lesion by pressing a glass slide (gently!) down on the skin. If the lesion blanches (i.e., the color disappears when pressure is applied to it), it is not a bruise and most likely represents a rash. If you are still in doubt about the nature of a bruise, repeat the examination a few days later. This should allow you to clarify the nature of a suspicious lesion. Bruises will have faded, or changed colors and/or shape whereas nevi or birthmarks will remain identical and homogeneous in color.

Head and neck

Search carefully for subtle injuries. Part the hair and observe the scalp for subtle discoloration of bruises. Feel the scalp to detect otherwise invisible hematomas. Look for areas of alopecia, which may be traumatic. In infants, palpate the fontanel. A tense or bulging fontanel may be a sign of intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral edema. Feel the sutures as well; splaying may indicate chronic increased intracranial pressure from hemorrhage. Evaluation of past and current head circumference measurements is crucial for all infants. The pattern of growth may reveal a specific moment in time when head growth became abnormal and may therefore suggest an approximate date or onset of abusive head trauma, which could be correlated with reported signs and symptoms.

Inspect the oral cavity thoroughly to assess the integrity of the lip and lingual frenula. Look at the palate and pharynx for petechiae, which may be the result of forceful insertion of an object in the mouth. Look at the teeth carefully to detect dental decay, avulsions, or fractures. Abnormal dentition may be due to osteogenesis imperfecta, a condition that can result in fractures that occur with less force than expected. Observe the angles of the jaw and cheeks for any sign of injury, such as bruising.

Look at the eyes to detect potentially subtle subconjunctival hemorrhages or hyphemas. Also, note the color of the sclera. A bluish discoloration (of which a mild amount can be normal in infants) may suggest a connective tissue disorder, which may be implicated in unusual bruising. The retina must be examined in all infants. Although a direct funduscopic examination may reveal concerning retinal hemorrhages, it only allows visualization of the very back of the retina. For this reason, the absence of retinal hemorrhages on direct funduscopy does not mean that retinal hemorrhages are not present. A retinal exam is adequate in infants if it is done by dilated indirect funduscopy (i.e., by an ophthalmologist) only. Such an exam allows visualization of the retina all the way around to the ora serrata.

Look in the ears to detect the presence of hemotympanum or of a perforated drum. Pay particular attention to the retroauricular areas and pinnae of the ears, which rarely bruise accidentally.

Physical examination for suspected neglect

In cases of malnutrition and neglect, strongly consider admitting the child to the hospital for observation. The information you will gather over time will prove to be of great support in diagnosing chronic neglect or may reveal a reasonable explanation or medical cause to explain the findings.

Document the child’s growth parameters. Use the weight-for-height as an additional helpful indicator of nutritional status. In addition, plot out the weight age by drawing a horizontal line back from the child’s actual weight to the 50th percentile line. This will drive home the extent of a child’s malnutrition to nonmedically trained professionals. Describing a 9-month-old by saying that he is “the size of an average 2-month-old” is much more illustrative of the gravity of the situation than to say he is “below the 3rd percentile for age.”

Look for redundant skin folds secondary to weight loss on the buttocks and extremities, hypotonia, poor muscle bulk, severe diaper dermatitis, or plagiocephaly. In the absence of congenital torticollis, plagiocephaly often results from children lying on their backs for prolonged periods of time. Observe the child’s posture; some children with chronic deprivation maintain the typical infantile posture that normally disappears after the first 4 or 5 months (i.e., flexed elbows, hips and knees, with closed fists held close to the face). The classic posture of sensory deprivation involves the sustained external rotation of the shoulder, flexion at the elbows, with the arms pronated and hands near the head or face, often with clenched fists. Sometimes similar flexion at the hips and knees is seen in the frog-leg position, along with supinated feet (Fig. 21–11).

image

FIGURE 21–11 Persistent infantile posture in neglected children.

(From Krieger I, Sargent DA: A postural sign in the sensory deprivation syndrome in infants. J Pediatr 70(3):332-339, 1967.)

Take note of the child’s temperament and behavior. Is the child interactive or isolated? Is he or she appropriately stranger-anxious or does he or she attach to anyone? Many chronically neglected infants exhibit typical behaviors such as isolation and withdrawal. Some children may also show less than the expected reaction to painful procedures. Many neglected infants lie still and motionless, following with their eyes only—the so-called radar-gaze or frozen watchfulness. Note whether the child seems hungry or anorexic, as a clue to why the child may not be feeding well. Remember, however, that children with ongoing nutritional neglect may develop a secondary anorexia that is not the initial cause of the decreased nutritional intake.

Assess and document the child’s development and its appropriateness for his or her age. Lack of stimulation may lead to developmental delays (and vice versa), often most obvious in gross motor or language development. Make sure that you complete an initial developmental assessment that can then be repeated after treatment, foster care placement, or alternate care environment. Neglected children can show dramatic, rapid developmental gains once they are well fed and in a stimulating environment—a feature that is not seen in children in whom organic causes of developmental delay are present.

Pay special attention to parent-child interactions. Does the child respond to his or her parents’ presence? Many children show no significant interaction with their parents if chronic neglect has taught them that it is not effective to have their needs met. Do the parents visit or demonstrate concern for their child? Some parents visit but do not interact with their child at all; this is important because it likely heralds an attachment problem. Note how the parents handle the child, how they hold their infant or move them, change their diaper, or soothe them. Are they gentle or rough? Do they play with the baby in an age-appropriate way? Do they talk or sing to the child? Do they pick up on their baby’s cues? Some parents may not respond to their infant’s cues at all.

Notes on Photography

With the advent of digital photography and the availability of photo manipulation software to the public, great care must be taken to ensure that photographs are not construed to have possibly been altered after they were taken.

To avoid this issue entirely, traditional film photography is preferred for documentation of findings when a case is likely to be legally challenged. In reality however, most practitioners who have photographic capabilities will likely have a digital camera. A good quality digital camera may nevertheless be used to document findings. To ensure the highest level of quality, you, taking the photographs, should:

If at all possible, use a separate computer folder for the involved patient.

When taking photographs, remember that the body part being photographed should be recognizable to anyone looking at the photograph. To that end, take a global view of the body part in question and follow it up with close-up views.

Remember as well that with significant zoom capabilities, the size of a lesion may appear distorted to the unfamiliar observer. To avoid such difficulties, place a ruler or other graduated object in the field of view, to allow for evaluation of the size of a skin finding. If no such object is available, use a familiar object, such as a coin, in the field of view to have a similar effect.