Clinical and performance-based assessment

Published on 01/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 01/06/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1283 times

30 Clinical and performance-based assessment

Considerations in clinical assessment

The patient

Central to the clinical examination is the interaction of the examinee with a patient. The role of the patient in the encounter varies depending upon the type of interaction between the examinee and the patient expected. For the purpose of the examination, the patient may be a ‘real’ patient, a simulated patient or a computer representation used as a patient substitute.

There are benefits to be gained from the use of a range of patient representations in the clinical examination. The choice of patient representation will be influenced by what is being assessed, the level of standardisation required, the required realism or fidelity and the local logistics including the availability and relative costs associated with the use of real patients and trained simulated patients (Collins and Harden 1998).

Simulated patients

Difficulties in standardising real patients and a lack of availability in some situations led to the development of simulated or standardised patients. These have been used for assessment as well as teaching. The simulated patient, as described in Chapter 25, is usually a lay person who has undergone various levels of training in order to provide a consistent clinical scenario. The examinee interacts with the simulated patient in the same way as if they were taking a history, examining or counselling a real patient. Simulated patients are used most commonly to assess history taking and communication skills or physical examination where no abnormality is found. Simulated patients have also been used to simulate a range of physical findings including, for example, different neurological presentations. The term ‘standardised patient’ has been used to indicate that the person has been trained to play the role of the patient consistently and according to specific criteria.

Simulators and models

Simulators, from the very basic models used to assess skills such as skin suturing to the more complex interactive whole-body manikins such as SimMan, have been used increasingly in medical training as outlined in Chapter 25. They have an important role to play in assessment. The Harvey cardiac manikin, for example, has been used at an OSCE station to assess skills in cardiac auscultation. Simulators are valuable to assess procedural and practical skills including the insertion of intravenous lines, catheterisation and endoscopy technique. While simulators have played a key role in competence assessment in other fields, notably with airline pilots, simulators have been slow to make an impact in assessment in medicine. The situation has changed rapidly and such devices now play a prominent role in clinical assessment. Indeed in some instances surgeons are allowed to perform a procedure in clinical practice only after they have demonstrated competence on a simulator.

The examiner

In addition to the student and the patient, the third key element in clinical or performance assessment is the examiner. The role of the examiner is to collect evidence about the examinee’s behaviour in the context of the assessment and to pass judgement on the examinee’s competence or performance. The examiner may be a clinician, another healthcare professional or a simulated patient. After appropriate training simulated patients are, in some situations, particularly in North America, used to assess the student’s performance in an OSCE. Other members of the healthcare team frequently contribute to multi-source feedback assessment as described below.

Whatever the assessment method used, it is important to include a number of examiners. A problem with the long case in a traditional clinical examination was over-reliance on the ratings of one or two examiners. In contrast, the OSCE has input from a number of examiners which is a major advantage.

Buy Membership for Internal Medicine Category to continue reading. Learn more here