Circuit G

Published on 21/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1026 times

Circuit G

STATION 1

This station assesses your ability to elicit clinical signs:

STATION 2

This station assesses your ability to elicit clinical signs:

STATION 3

This station assesses your ability to elicit clinical signs:

STATION 4

This station assesses your ability to elicit clinical signs:

STATION 6

This station assesses your ability to assess specifically requested areas in a child with a developmental problem:

CLINICAL SCENARIO

The infant is accompanied by her mother. On initial general inspection you find her to be looking around lying on her back. She is moving all four limbs, is able to reach out for bright toys, pass objects from hand to hand and to place them in her mouth. She turns to her mother’s voice but makes little noise and no words herself.

You ask the mother if you may examine her more closely. With permission you then formally test the motor development (gross and fine motor).

On pulling to sit there is reduced truncal tone and mildly reduced head control. She is unable to sit unsupported. When held vertically, she will put weight on both legs and bounce weakly. She will not support herself or hold on to the cot side for support. In ventral suspension you again note impaired head control (to 45°) and truncal hypotonia. On lying her down on her front the infant will push on her hands a limited amount. You move on to test the Moro reflex, which has been lost.

You test fine motor control initially with a single bright red brick, which she takes in a full palmar grasp and transfers from hand to hand. A second brick is introduced, which she takes in her other hand and then bangs the bricks together. She is not able to scribble with a crayon, build blocks into a tower of three or put pieces into a simple jigsaw.

What is the developmental age of this child in the area of gross motor development?

What is the developmental age of this child in the area of fine motor development?

What additional developmental reflexes could you describe or test in this child?

STATION 7

This station assesses your ability to communicate appropriate, factually correct information in an effective way within the emotional context of the clinical setting:

STATION 8

This station assesses your ability to communicate appropriate, factually correct information in an effective way within the emotional context of the clinical setting:

STATION 9

This station assesses your ability to take a focused history and explain to the parent your diagnosis or differential management plan:

COMMENTS ON STATION 1

DIAGNOSIS: REPAIR OF AORTIC COARCTATION; TURNER’S SYNDROME

A thorough knowledge of cardiovascular defects, their management and their sequelae is vital for the exam. It is important that you know what the common scars look like – reading about a lateral thoracotomy scar is not the same as having seen one. In this case the small secondary scar is probably from a chest drain.

It is important to let the examiner know that you would measure a four- limb BP in addition to plotting the length, weight and head circumference on the appropriate chart. An ECG, CXR and echocardiogram are essential firstline investigations of a significant murmur with no innocent features.

This child has had a repair of aortic coarctation; the pedal oedema is important as it suggests an underlying diagnosis of Turner’s syndrome. It is not a feature of cardiac failure in this circumstance. Karyotyping of a blood sample will be diagnostic in the majority of cases.

The clinical features of Turner’s syndrome (congenital lymphoedema, short stature and gonadal dysgenesis) can be divided into neonatal, childhood and adolescent findings. You should become familiar with Turner’s syndrome as the children are generally well but require prolonged follow-up. Extensive detail is provided here as this same child could be used for the communication skills stations – ‘Explain to this child’s parents what a diagnosis of Turner’s syndrome means?’ – or as a history-taking/ management-planning scenario.

Age Clinical findings
Neonatal Dorsal oedema of hands and feet
  Redundant nuchal skin folds (secondary to in utero cystic hygromas)
  Low birth weight and reduced length
  17-45% cardiac lesion (bicuspid aortic valve, coarctation of aorta, aortic stenosis, hypoplastic left heart)
  Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) more common
Childhood Short stature (proportional)
  10% developmental delay
  Facial abnormalities (epicanthic folds, small mandible, prominent ears, high palate)
  Webbed neck
  Low posterior hairline
  Prominent ‘shield’ chest
  Widely spaced nipples
  Cubitum valgum
  Hyperconvex fingernails
  Grommits for ‘glue ear’ common
Teenage Failed onset of pubertal development (10% have breast enlargement)
  Progressively more prominent pigmented naevi
  30% renal abnormalities
  70% impairment of non-verbal perceptual motor and visuospatial skills
  15-30% hypothyroid
  Scoliosis, lordosis and kyphosis more common

MANAGEMENT ISSUES

At the time of diagnosis with Turner’s syndrome it is important to have baseline investigations: cardiac echocardiogram, thyroid function tests, hearing test, renal ultrasound scan, ovarian function tests, growth assessment and a psychosocial assessment.

Aortic dissection is a significant concern in patients with structural cardiac abnormalities, hypertension or a combination of the two. Hypertension should be treated aggressively. Bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis may be required. Bear this in mind as dental malocclusion is common and may be treated prophylactically. Cardiac disorders in Turner’s syndrome are the reason for the increase in mortality in this condition. A nice touch in any discussion with parents is to acknowledge the increased risk of keloid scar formation – important if you are to have a large scar on your chest!

Recombinant human growth hormone (GH) supplementation is offered despite the patients not having a GH deficiency. The supplementation is thought to improve final height. Therapy should be initiated when height is below the fifth centile for age-matched normal females (may be before 2 years of age). Oxandrolone (anabolic steroid) in low dose will also increase final adult height and may be used in conjunction with GH.

Thyroid function should be assessed initially and from the age of 10 years.

Oestrogen therapy from 12–13 years will help the development of secondary sexual characteristics but will not affect final height. In fact, as oestrogen therapy encourages epiphyseal plate closure it may inhibit full height potential.

There is also an increased risk of Crohn’s disease (Crohn’s is linked to the X chromosome).

COMMENTS ON STATION 2

DIAGNOSIS: LEUKAEMIA

In this station you have been presented with a Cushingoid 10-year-old with signs of anaemia, petechiae, alopecia and a central venous line.

The most likely reasons for a child having a central venous line are shown in the table below.

Patient Notes
Oncological Needs chemotherapy
Haematological Haemophilia requiring regular Factor VIII injections
Gastrointestinal Total parenteral nutrition, e.g. short gut syndrome (secondary to Crohn’s disease or neonatal enterocolitis)
Renal Red and blue ends for afferent and efferent lumens for haemodialysis
Immune deficient Regular antibiotics or immunoglobulin replacement

In this case there is a suggestion of bone marrow failure and enlarged liver and spleen, making the most likely underlying diagnosis malignancy (in particular, leukaemia). The Cushingoid appearances are secondary to the high-dose steroid chemotherapy.

In addition to following the instruction to examine the abdominal system it is important that you demonstrate any lymphoreticular abnormality, so check the cervical, axillary and groin nodes (with permission) for lympha-denopathy. It is also important to decide whether the child is in cardiac failure secondary to the anaemia. You may also see scars on the iliac crests from bone marrow aspirates or at the site of previous lumbar punctures.

Presentation of these findings should be done succinctly; for example:

Note that the term ‘finger-breadths’ was used rather than an estimated span in centimetres; it will save you having to bring out a tape measure when the examiner challenges you! Paediatric oncology is an important subspecialty to which the candidate may not have been exposed; however, it is vital prior to the examination to have sought clinical experience in this area. In the communication skills station you could be required to ‘break the bad news’ to the parents of a child with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, while in the history-taking/management planning scenario you may have to discuss with patients and their families the common problems affecting their chronic care. You must be able to explain the side effects of long-term steroid use; the following mnemonic may help:

COMMENTS ON STATION 3

DIAGNOSIS: BENIGN INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION

In this case the child had benign intracranial hypertension (BIH), which may be referred to as a pseudotumour cerebri.

BIH is a condition of idiopathic raised intracranial pressure and, importantly, may lead to papilloedema, progressive optic atrophy and blindness. Its pathogenesis is unclear, but may be due to an increased resistance to the flow of CSF at the arachnoid granulations, thereby reducing the rate of CSF reabsorption. The presenting symptoms may include headaches, tinnitus, diplopia (with sixth nerve palsy) and other visual defects, particularly a ‘nasal step’ field defect.

The most common risk factors for BIH are endocrine and include female sex, reproductive age group, obesity, hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenal axis disruption, thyroid and parathyroid disorders. The use of certain drugs may be associated with an increased risk of BIH, e.g. corticosteroids, retinoic acid preparations, levothyroxine and tetracycline.

Category Cause
Intracranial haemorrhage Traumatic brain injury
• Extradural haematoma Expanding arteriovenous malformation
• Subdural haematoma Ruptured cerebral artery aneurysm
• Subarachnoid haemorrhage  
• Intracerebral haemorrhage  
Infections Mastoiditis
  Meningitis
  Encephalitis
Vascular Ischaemic infarcts
  Vasculitis
Neoplastic Intracranial tumour (primary or metastatic)
Haematology Sickling syndromes
  Polycythaemia
  Prothrombotic states
Other Hydrocephalus
  Benign intracranial hypertension
  Idiopathic

What would be your first-line investigations?

COMMENTS ON STATION 4

DIAGNOSIS: ASTHMA

If you have helped out in organising a clinical exam you will know that the biggest headache for the senior examiner is making sure all the patients turn up. In most centres one child will have to be replaced at short notice and a well asthmatic on the inpatient ward is the easiest replacement. Common things are common and even the most competent candidate can fall at what should be an easy hurdle. They may have a thorough knowledge of the genetics of Kartagener’s syndrome but no appreciation of the latest British Thoracic Society guidelines for asthma!

The differential diagnoses for a child with wheeze (expiratory noise) can be divided as shown in the table below.

System Conditions
Respiratory: extrathoracic These cause stridor (inspiratory noise) as the predominant symptom Adenotonsillar hypertrophy Peritonsillar abscess Retropharyngeal abscess Epiglottitis
Vocal cord dysfunction
Respiratory: intrathoracic Tracheal stenosis or web Bacterial tracheitis Tracheo-bronchomalacia Tracheo-oesophageal fistula (H type or repair) Bronchiolitis (in the infant) Vascular ring
Respiratory: functional Asthma Cystic fibrosis Recurrent aspiration
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (in the ex-pre-term infant)
Bronchiectasis (including primary ciliary dyskinesia)
Cardiovascular Cardiac failure (pulmonary oedema) Cardiomegaly
Gastrointestinal Gastro-oesophageal reflux
Lymphoreticular Mediastinal mass/lymphadenopathy Immunodeficiency

What part of the respiratory system examination should you offer to examine next?

It is important to remember to offer to examine the ears, nose and throat in all respiratory cases. You may find nasal polyps, grommets, hearing aids, cleft palate repair or other abnormalities which may assist with the narrowing of your differential. It is also important to remember to palpate for lymphadenopathy.

What additional bedside tests are important in this child?

In asthma and other reactive airways disease it is important to check the child’s peak expiratory flow (PEF) or formal spirometry. If there is a PEF meter to hand you may be asked to direct the child yourself, so be sure to be aware of the proper technique. Your hospital should have a children’s respiratory nurse. Thirty minutes spent with her will be 30 minutes well spent if you are asked to do this! A knowledge of the variety of asthma devices (inhaler type, spacers, PEF meters) is expected and may be required in almost any of the stations in the exam. Remember that the predicted PEF is proportional to the child’s height (approximate PEFR = (height in cm x 5) – 400).

In addition to the PEF you should ask to see the child’s sputum specimen pot (for the thick sticky green secretions seen in cystic fibrosis or bronchiectasis), measure a blood pressure and plot the child’s height and weight on the appropriate chart.

COMMENTS ON STATION S

DIAGNOSIS: NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 1 (NF1)

Unless you are a lists person try not to compartmentalise your knowledge too much. You will find in the exam that you need to have the ability to think laterally and out of the boxes. However, certain conditions such as Down’s, Turner’s and the neurocutaneous syndromes lend themselves well to the list approach. Make sure you know the list, not think you know!

Diagnostic criteria for NF1 include the presence of at least two of the following:

Differential diagnoses for conditions with café au lait patches include:

What systems will you now examine and how will you structure your examination?

Practise answering this question before the exam. It is actually quite difficult to do ad hoc and you may find yourself jumping all over the place. It is important to try and be systematic and it may be more fluid to explain yourself as you go along.

Try and decide on a structured examination that allows the incorporation of the different systems. Practise the scheme on patients or colleagues to get used to the task.

The disorder is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Fifty percent are familial and the remainder are new mutations. The disorder has an incidence of approximately 1 in 3000 live births.

Neurofibromin is the protein encoded by the NF1 gene, located at 17q11.2. It encodes a large protein that is expressed in brain, kidney, spleen and thymus tissue.

COMMENTS ON STATION 6

DIAGNOSIS: GLOBAL DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY

The child in this case is actually 15 months old. She has developmental delay with truncal hypotonia. It is important not to make statements regarding the child’s true age if it is not known; instead refer to the developmental age.

It is useful to have memorised important milestones – these can be taken from standard texts or assessment tools (e.g. the Denver chart). If you can identify the most advanced task achieved in one developmental area and then demonstrate that the next task is failed it is possible to give a developmental age range. Remember there may be dissociation of development, i.e. one field is more delayed than a second. The developmental age of the child is 6–8 weeks for gross motor but 10 months for fine motor. Both are delayed but discordant with each other.

What additional developmental reflexes could you describe or test in this child?

This child had an as yet undiagnosed central neurological problem. Interestingly, her fine motor skills are more developed than her gross motor skills. Do not let this put you off. The developmental station is testing your assessment skills as a paediatrician, not your diagnostic skills as a geneticist or a neurologist.

However, it is important to assess developmental areas individually and not assume an obviously disabled child is delayed in all areas.

COMMENTS ON STATION 7

This is bread-and-butter paediatrics and your examiner would expect you to perform to a high standard in order to pass the station. In order to do this you will need to have an understanding of asthma management in both acute and outpatient settings. Obviously, you must understand the advantages and disadvantages of interventions such as inhaled steroid. Also you must predict what the mother’s agenda is likely to be. What was the reason she didn’t want to start preventative treatment? This is a communication station so a regurgitation of facts about the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines will be of no use if mum is concerned because her mother fractured her hip secondary to steroid use!

How would you initiate the conversation?

On entering the room you should take on the role assigned (in this case the registrar) and introduce yourself as Dr X. You should confirm their names and then politely thank them for coming to see you and explain that you hope not to be disturbed through the consultation. It is good practice early on to let them know that they should feel free to interrupt you and ask questions if anything is unclear.

What do you expect the mother will want to know about the inhaled steroid?

The key to this station is listening attentively and finding out any specific concerns. This is, after all, a communication skills station and you will be expected to show active listening skills. You should then address concerns appropriately.

It is likely that the mother will have heard about steroids and the possible side effects. Often in communication stations a family member has previously been affected deleteriously by a particular drug and the family have obvious concerns for their child being given that drug.

System Side effects
Skin Skin thinning, purpura, alopecia, striae, ‘Cushingoid facies’
Eye Cataracts, glaucoma
Cardiovascular Hypertension, hyperlipidaemia
Gastrointestinal Gastritis and ulceration, pancreatitis, bowel perforation
Renal Fluid and electrolyte imbalance
Musculoskeletal Myopathy, osteoporosis, avascular necrosis
Neurological Hyperactivity, benign intracranial hypertension, euphoria
Endocrine Diabetes mellitus, secondary adrenal insufficiency
Immune system Increased opportunistic and standard infections

In this case you will be able to reassure her that inhaled steroids at the standard dosing do not have the side effects seen in systemic corticosteroid therapy. Inhaled corticosteroids have been shown to cause oral candidiasis; there are case reports of adrenal suppression and short-term linear growth restriction but with attainment of normal adult height.

The inhaled corticosteroids reduce symptoms and improve lung function, while uncontrolled asthma has the potential to cause significant growth restriction, impair exercise tolerance and has an associated mortality. The inhaled steroid dosing should be reviewed regularly and the dose gradually reduced to the lowest that provides good symptom control.

What would you include in an asthma plan for an acute exacerbation?

The BTS again provide up-to-date guidance on this issue. A written asthma plan should be provided for every patient and may be divided into:

What would be the key issues for managing and monitoring background symptoms?

There is clear guidance from the BTS on the management of asthma. You should ensure that you have read and understood the latest edition of the guidelines (www.brit-thoracic.org.uk.)

The management of asthma should include the following:

COMMENTS ON STATION 8

This is a common scenario in life as a neonatal registrar, in interviews and exams. Remember that the station is targeted at assessing your communication skills and understanding of ethics rather than your in-depth understanding of neonatology.

As with all cases, it is essential to start with a clear introduction of your name and position. You should ask the couple their preferred names and remember to use them in the interview. It would look good if you told the couple that you had made arrangements not to be disturbed. You should ask the couple if they know if the baby is a boy or girl or if they have decided upon a name (so you don’t have to refer to the baby as ‘it’!).

What does resuscitation of a 24-week gestation newborn involve?

For this communication skills station it is useful to have worked on the neonatal unit and to have been involved in the resuscitation of extremely premature babies. For aspects of newborn life support (NLS) you should refer to the Resuscitation Council (www.resus.org.uk) course material. The following is a simple outline of the proceedings:

An initial approach to the subject might be to ask the couple what they thought would happen if their baby were to be born prematurely. You may find they know far more than you expected or much less than you’d hoped! You can then tailor your discussion to suit their understanding.

In this scenario the following important points may be mentioned:

In the UK, morbidity and mortality data are available for neonates born prematurely through the Epicure study (bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/ full/319/7217/1093/DC1).

Don’t be afraid to offer meetings, patient information sheets or follow-up appointments in the scenarios – if it is available in a hospital it can be ‘available’ here too.

The couple may ask you not to resuscitate the baby when it is born. In this situation you must be sure of your legal and ethical responsibility. It would be important to offer the couple an urgent meeting with the duty consultant. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (UK) provide guidance in the publication Withholding and Withdrawing Life Sustaining Treatment in Children: A Framework for Practice, May 2004.

Within the document there is a discussion of five occasions when it may be ethical and legal to consider withholding treatment (see p. 119):

Should there be a precipitous delivery prior to resolution of this issue, there is a responsibility to offer resuscitation to an infant showing signs of life.

COMMENTS ON STATION 9

This station is designed to assess your communication skills with the family and history-taking ability. You should follow the instructions given and focus your history on the presenting complaint for the majority of the time. Your time management in this station is essential, and remember: you can always finish talking with the family a minute early and collect your thoughts prior to presenting to the examiner.

How will you structure the interview?

In the time you have available outside the station you should decide what areas you want to cover in the history. A structure for the interview may then be as follows:

At the end you should have a good idea of what happened, the main problems, any associated features/precipitants/family history and the nature of these problems, and have formulated a plan of action.

What are your differential diagnoses for ‘loss of consciousness’ in this age group?

System Cause
Neurological Seizure disorder Behavioural Reflex anoxic seizure Cerebrovascular accident
Respiratory Respiratory arrest with hypoxia Cough syncope Breath-holding
Cardiovascular Tachyarrhythmias (SVT, long Q-T)
Bradyarrhythmias (AV conduction defects)
Cardiomyopathy
Vasovagal episodes
Postural hypotension
Shock, including anaphylaxis
Left ventricular outflow obstruction, including aortic stenosis Congenital heart disease (including Fallot’s tetralogy) Pulmonary hypertension
Metabolic Hypoglycaemia
Drug-induced Inhaled nitrites Antihypertensive agents Tricyclic antidepressant
Drugs of abuse (unlikely intentional at this age)

What will your management plan involve?

The plan will depend on the likely cause and this will be determined by information gained in the history. It is known that most children will have normal investigations following a loss of consciousness.

For recurrent episodes that you feel are likely cardiac in origin you may suggest:

If you feel that the episodes are representing seizure activity, you could suggest:

It is important to give a clear management plan, but do not be ashamed of including in the plan that you would discuss the case with your consultant. It is better to be cautious and ask for advice from senior colleagues.