Circuit C

Published on 21/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1320 times

Circuit C

STATION 4

This station assesses your ability to elicit clinical signs:

STATION 7

This station assesses your ability to communicate appropriate, factually correct information in an effective way within the emotional context of the clinical setting:

STATION 9

This station assesses your ability to take a focused history and explain to the parent your diagnosis or differential management plan:

This is a 22-minute station of spoken interaction. You will have up to 4 minutes beforehand to prepare yourself. The scenario is below. Be aware that you should focus on the task given. You will be penalised for asking irrelevant questions or providing superfluous information. When the bell sounds you will be invited into the examination room. You will have 13 minutes with the patient (with a warning when you have 4 minutes left). You will then have a short period to reflect on the case while the patient leaves the room. You will then have 9 minutes with the examiner.

COMMENTS ON STATION 1

DIAGNOSIS: AORTIC STENOSIS

It would be nice if every child seen in the cardiovascular station has obvious signs and symptoms – but they don’t. You may have a child with an unusual congenital heart defect whose abnormality is impossible to determine on clinical examination. So it is important to know what to rule out if your child has a murmur of indeterminate origin.

In this case you know the child has a systolic murmur without the presence of previous surgery or heart failure. What could this be?

As the child is not cyanosed, and there are no scars, this child does not have an uncorrected cyanotic heart condition (tetralogy of Fallot, pulmonary atresia without a ventricular septal defect, etc.). Ventricular septal defect is a fair guess in a well child, although it is unusual to have a defect which isn’t loudest at the lower left sternal edge. How do you rule out potentially more sinister defects? Pulmonary stenosis classically presents with an ejection systolic murmur maximal at the left sternal edge with an ejection click and split second heart sound. If all patients presented classically I think the exam would be a lot more fun! Fortunately aortic stenosis has a sign which cannot be present with other anomalies: a carotid thrill. The textbooks tell you a suprasternal thrill but pulmonary stenosis may also produce this. If a thrill is felt in the carotid region (and it is obvious, I promise!) then the murmur must be due to aortic stenosis. If you don’t feel a thrill you are not much better off, as it could still be aortic stenosis, and all the other differentials! But it is an important negative.

If you ascertain the presence of a thrill then you should start feeling comfortable as there are a number of other features to start looking for, all relatively easy to learn.

Did you remember to ask the examiner to check peripheral pulses and perform a blood pressure?

REMINDERS

Turner’s syndrome (full details can be found on p. 184) 5X (although mosaicism possible)

Proportional short stature

Cardiac disorders are the cause of increased mortality in this syndrome

Aortic coarctation most common cardiac defect

Dental malocclusion increased, so prophylaxis vital

Predisposition to keloid scar formation (child may have cardiac surgical scars)

Indication for using growth hormone (and consider using steroid to increase final height).

Aortic stenosis Tips
Exam Apex beat (do you always examine this?) may be displaced
  Suprasternal and carotid thrill
  Systolic murmur in aortic region and left sternal edge
  Have you felt for peripheral pulses? (Associated with coarctation)
  The slow rising pulse is a very difficult sign to elicit
  Have you listened to the back? (Not always helpful but there shouldn’t be radiation, unlike in coarctation)
  A budding cardiology professor may pick up the diastolic murmur of aortic incompetence, which is more likely to occur post-surgery
Investigation ECG normal in the well child but may show signs of left ventricular hypertrophy:

Management Generally a conservative approach with the guideline that a gradient of < 60 mmHg across the valve requires no treatment.   Surgical treatment is via balloon valvuloplasty and will have no obvious scar!   Remember the murmur may remain post-surgery Associated conditions You should know and be able to quickly recite associations with:

Oestrogen therapy to allow development of secondary sexual characteristics.

Williams’ syndrome (also see p. 37)

Microdeletion chromosome 7

Full lips and stellate irises

Supravalvular aortic stenosis and peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis

Mild mental retardation

Check BP as increased risk of renal artery stenosis.

COMMENTS ON STATION 2

DIAGNOSIS: INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

It is potentially possible to complete a large proportion of your SHO training with little experience of surgery and scars. Severe inflammatory bowel disease is generally treated by specialist gastroenterologists and surgeons and unless you have done a specific attachment your experience may be limited to the textbook. Knowledge of common surgical scars will either impress examiners or save embarrassment, depending on which way you look at it!

Nutritional assessment is commonly overlooked in revision. An entire short case may be devoted to it, so make sure you have an understanding of the principles involved.

Nutritional assessment Notes
General Weight /height /BMI
  Nasogastric placement
  Long-term venous access
  Does the patient look well?
Storage Subcutaneous fat (mid-arm, subscapular and axillary)
  Muscle bulk (biceps, triceps and quadriceps) Prominence of iliac bones
Face Pale conjunctiva
  Oral ulceration Dental caries
Skin Liver disease and vitamin deficiency demonstrated by jaundice and bruising
  Rashes
  Excoriations
  Erythema nodosum
Hands Pallor (of palmar creases)
  Clubbing of fingers
  Palmar erythema
  Koilonychia (dystrophy of the fingernails in which they are thinned and concave with raised edges; ‘spoon-shaped nails’)
  Leuconychia (white spots on the nails)
Abdomen Distension
  Hepatosplenomegaly
  Surgical scars
Other Gait examination: tests strength and any neurological impairment
  Blood pressure and pulse (standing and lying to measure postural change)
  Urinalysis and stool analysis as appropriate Pubertal assessment

Just because in books patients with Crohn’s disease have aphthous ulcers (do you actually know what these are?), gum hyperplasia, little subcutaneous fat, anaemia, growth delay, peri-anal skin tags and signs of steroid toxicity doesn’t mean your patient will.

[Aphthous ulcer: a shallow individual ulcer that is round or oval in shape. The ulcer will usually be no more than ¼ inch in diameter. The centre of the ulcer will be covered with a loosely attached white or greyish membrane. The edges of the ulcer will be regular (non-jagged) and surrounded by a reddish halo. The tissue adjacent to the ulcer will be healthy in appearance.]

Your growth-delayed, slightly pale teenager with a scar without signs of lymphoreticular disease (i.e. oncological) is likely to have an inflammatory bowel disease. If they have GI involvement outside of the colon, as evidenced by oral ulceration, then they are likely to have Crohn’s but this is not absolute. What you must do is convince the examiner you are able to acknowledge growth delay or nutritional deficiency in a sensitive manner. You must then assess the most likely cause of this. Finally, be able to suggest some investigations and management both for the acute and non-acute situation.

Inflammatory bowel disease Tips
Exam Weight/height/BMI/head circumference
  Clubbing (rare)
  Cushingoid appearance or striae
  Scars from acute surgery (obstruction) or non-acute surgery (growth failure, debilitating symptoms, colectomy/pouch or prevention of malignancy), perineum, looking for anal fissures and skin tags
Investigations Blood tests:
  (Leucocytosis, raised ESR, low protein, renal impairment, consider vitamins and minerals in long-term follow-up)
  Stool:
  Culture to exclude other diagnoses
  α1-Antitrypsin (reflects bowel protein loss)
  Imaging/endoscopy:
  Left wrist X-ray for bone age
  AXR acutely
  Barium meal/follow-through dependent on position of lesion
Management: Crohn’s Multidisciplinary approach
  Use of steroids (orally or intravenous)
  Aware of sulfasalazine for small bowel disease
  May need steroid sparing agents: azathioprine, ciclosporin or methotrexate
  Nutritional therapies including use of overnight feeds
Management: ulcerative colitis Multidisciplinary approach
  Steroid enemas or oral steroids
  Sulfasalazine for acute situation
  Yearly colonoscopy when disease > 10-15 years

An example answer would be:

REMINDER

A laparotomy scar will run transverse through the centre of the abdomen (see Fig. 4).

COMMENTS ON STATION 3

DIAGNOSIS: SYDENHAM’S CHOREA

The art of observation before examination is persistently stressed throughout your medical training. Although you may not have done this as a medical student it is essential you have the ability to ‘hang back’. Engaging your brain before putting your mouth in gear will stop you blurting out an answer you will be unable to defend.

It is vital before the exam that you are able to talk about observed features in a systematic fashion. It is actually a very difficult thing to do; try talking about colleagues’ gaits. Can you make an efficient summary without stopping, mumbling and being imprecise? The longer you are able to discuss things, the less time you have to be observed examining them – much the harder task!

Learning long lists of differentials is only helpful if you are able to pick up the signs that apply to them. In this situation you are expected to recognise chorea and possibly athetosis (with the appreciation that a written description is no substitute for actually having seen the clinical sign). The most obvious differential is a tic or habit spasm. These are repetitive and have a classical stereotypical pattern, but most importantly can be briefly controlled by the subject. The performance of the movement provides some brief relief.

It is useful to have a good understanding of the potential causes and apply those to the child in question. The examiner will expect you to be able to describe the irregular jerking movements and how the patient seems to have little control over them. They would then expect you to be able to mention additional signs (seen or unseen) that would aid a diagnosis, not just a list of differentials.

In the former you instantly lose the trust of the mother and the examiner wonders where you learned your bedside manner. The second demonstrates you are not just a walking textbook but able to apply your knowledge systematically and relevantly. This child had Sydenham’s chorea.

Chorea Notes PASS
Anticonvulsant side effect  
Cerebral palsy – dyskinetic Look specifically for athetosis (slow writhing movements) as cerebral palsy is the commonest cause of this
  Assess intellectual impairment, spastic posturing and gait
Sydenham’s chorea Acute-onset choreiform movements
  May have ‘milkmaid’s grip’ – inconsistent hard and weak grasp of examining finger
  Extended hands tend to pronate
  Anaemia, leucocytosis and potential increased ESR
  Check ASO titre
  Throat swab for Group A haemolytic streptococci There may be a psychological element (emotional lability and depression)
  Treat with dopaminergic blockers (haloperidol)
  Remember this is a major manifestation of rheumatic fever and so is likely to need antistreptococcal rheumatic fever prophylaxis
Wilson’s disease Family history (autosomal recessive)
  Difficulty excreting copper in bile
  Low ceruloplasmin and increased urinary excretion of copper
  Evidence of liver failure (must examine abdomen of children with chorea)
  Copper chelate with D-penicillamine
Degenerative conditions (?appropriate for exam) Huntington’s disease, Lesch-Nyhan, Moyamoya

The following websites have video clips of choreiform movements and tics. The former is a superb revision aid, especially for developmental progression in the under-2-year-old (go to pediNeurologic exam):

The movements may be controlled by haloperidol, although it is important to discuss some of the important side effects and caveats with parents before commencing treatment. This would easily be the basis for a communication station.

Criteria for diagnosis of rheumatic fever (need two major or one major and two minor plus evidence of streptococcal disease)

Major Plus
Carditis Increased titres of antistreptolysin O
Polyarthritis Positive throat culture for Group A streptococci
Sydenham’s chorea  
Erythema marginatum  
Subcutaneous nodules (not erythema nodosum)  
Minor After acute episode
Previous rheumatic fever Need regular penicillin
Polyarthralgia Follow-up of possible valvular damage
Fever  
Elevated CRP, ESR, WCC  
Prolonged P-R interval  

COMMENTS ON STATION 4

DIAGNOSIS: RIGHT BASAL PNEUMONIA

The new exam mark sheets have a specific box to assess whether the child is cooperative or not for the exam. As long as you have not provoked the child by doing something inappropriate or rough you cannot be penalised. In the stress of the exam it is easy to forget the ‘child’ and only remember the ‘system’. Part of your introductory patter should involve some play with the child. Most importantly, get mother on your side! To some candidates this comes naturally but to others it may not be normal (or sometimes expected) for them to be involved in child’s play. It is a skill as hard as picking up an atrial septal defect and probably should be practised as much! Chronic respiratory disease is an easy provider of signs and symptoms so is well utilised in the exam. However, there is no reason that a previous acutely unwell child may be used. In this case there are specific features to elucidate, so have you been listening? Which side were the abnormal breath sounds on? Is there an inhaler/monitor/sputum pot by the bed? Do not stop listening until you are able to tell the examiner:

This child is recovering from a right basal pneumonia but in order to make this diagnosis you must also know:

COMMENTS ON STATION 5

DIAGNOSIS: FANCONI’S ANAEMIA

Having remembered long lists of odd syndromes and genetic variants for the previous two exams it would be nice to think there was something you could forget! Unfortunately, the ‘other’ station may bring up the odd curiosity despite the College’s statement that this should be an exam of normal practice. Much like dermatological problems being linked to underlying neurological deficits, abnormalities of the arms, especially the radius and thumb, are linked to haematological disease. The two most common textbook examples are TAR (thrombocytopenia absent radius syndrome) and in this case Fanconi’s anaemia. Sometimes you just have to know your stuff!

Fanconi’s anaemia Notes
Signs and symptoms Anaemia causing weakness
  Neutropenia causing infections
  Thrombocytopenia causing bleeding and bruising
  Commonly have abnormal pigmentation of the skin
  May have short stature with skeletal malformations (absent thumb and radius – check it’s there!)
  Renal anomalies
Laboratory findings Macrocytic anaemia
  Thrombocytopenia precedes severe aplastic anaemia
  Rule out idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
Complications Generally related to haematological dysfunction but there is also a significant risk of developing a malignancy, especially leukaemias and solid tumours

COMMENTS ON STATION 6

DIAGNOSIS: TREACHER COLLINS SYNDROME

Do you know your syndromes? For this case it actually doesn’t matter, as you were asked to ‘assess this child’s speech and language’. In fact, it is very important not to get distracted by the obvious abnormalities. Even knowing the syndrome, if you cannot do a quick assessment of speech and hearing you will not be gaining the marks. Remember the College specifically say they are not testing you against the trained developmental paediatrician but the first-year registrar. Accepting this child is unlikely to present to an outpatient clinic at this age with concerns about speech and language, this must still be the approach to take.

Unless definitely told otherwise, it is appropriate to ask the mother about any concerns she has with regard to hearing and speech. The examiner may use this to ask further questions about how you would test specific deficits. Make sure you have seen audiological tests performed. You may well be asked to explain them in the communication skills station!

In the exam, as you do not have access to audiometry you must utilise simpler tests such as distraction testing. In fact, this simple test may be utilised for any age. While playing with the child (without noise), if you ask the examiner to call his name from behind him and he looks round every time then some element of hearing must be present (the converse is not true!). It can be difficult to show differences in each ear but the McCormick toy test may be used. Although used for a slightly younger age group (2–4 years) you do not have formal audiological testing to hand and neurological exam on the eighth cranial nerve is not an appropriate first step for this station. Pairs of similar sounding toys are placed in front of the child and the name of one whispered in each ear. It is important that the child cannot see your mouth as some children may have learnt basic lip-reading.

Listening to the child talk is vital as it is a functional sign of audiological ability. Poor quality or limited language for a 5-year-old in the absence of motor problems is likely to represent a degree of hearing impairment. Given the malformations, this may seem like an obvious diagnosis. The examiner is looking for how you approach the history and child.

Have you commented that the fine and gross motor skills appear normal? Is the child playing with toys that produce noise? How does he interact with his mother?

Note in the guidelines to the exam that the College specifically state that the child will have a developmental age of less than 5 years. This does not mean the child will be less than 5 years. It does mean that as long as you know development milestones up to 5 years of age you should at least be able to comment on whether the child is underachieving.

Causes of speech delay are listed below. Again, you are being assessed on your ability to recognise developmental abnormality, not to provide a list of differential diagnosis. This list should help you look for things to confirm your initial suspicions and maybe make comments on other features that support this – proving to the examiner you really are a well-rounded paediatrician!

  At 5 years
Gross motor Stands on one foot for up to 10 seconds (and can therefore hop)
  Interest in climbing
  May be able to skip
Fine motor and vision Copies triangle
  Draws person with body details
  Uses fork and spoon but not knife
Speech and hearing Can count 10 objects  
Knows if morning or afternoon Can read words  
Social Knows name and address
  Can use large buttons in dressing and undressing
  Knows right and left hand
  Can do simple household tasks (helps with dishes)

TYPE OF HEARING TEST

•Distraction tests 6–12 months
•Speech discrimination tests 2–4 years
•Performance tests 24–30 months
• Pure tone audiometry 4–5 years
• Electrical response audiometry Neonate
• Brain stem auditory evoked responses Neonate
•Evoked otoacoustic emissions Any age

COMMENTS ON STATION 7

The ability to communicate to professional colleagues is viewed as important as talking to parents. With the growing rise of Medical Education as a specialty in its own right, the ability to teach is increasingly seen as a prerequisite skill. In this scenario the important points are ensuring the student understands and can demonstrate the skill. Just running through BLS in front of the student may fail you if that is all you demonstrate. The student must be able to perform the tasks in the correct order without prompting. Obviously in 9 minutes it will be difficult to complete the task but an impression will be made of the rapport you make.

A proposed sequence is:

Just reading these pointers will be of little help. It is vital you are observed performing this exercise with a colleague by a senior paediatrician who can give you feedback. It is amazing how quickly a simple task becomes complex when you are observed doing it!

At each point the student should demonstrate their understanding and be able to do the practical task. If you have time you may demonstrate the whole scenario to them and get them to do the same.

Make sure you are familiar with the latest Advanced Paediatric Life Support Guidelines.

COMMENTS ON STATION 8

Although this may seem like an unlikely scenario and not particularly the duty of a first-year registrar, there are many times when family members have certain questions which are appropriate for you to answer. The brain stem death test is not something which will be carried out by a registrar but is something with which you should at least be aware. The essence of this case is how you approach the very sensitive issue of death. The principles of good preparation are vital. You must introduce yourself with full name and position. Tell Mark you have diverted your pager and ask if he would like anyone else present. It may be worthwhile suggesting a nurse accompany you.

An initial statement saying how sorry you are for the situation is essential. The sequence of questions/answers from here is difficult to predict and it would seem sensible to take your lead from Mark. It may be that Mark may show signs of distress or even anger at the care his sister has received. This is an understandable reaction and can be addressed as such. Remember actors may be employed and will demonstrate accurate and very real representations of people’s emotions. Ultimately the overall issue is that Stephanie has died and the machines are providing complete life support for her. It would be inappropriate, in order to deflect some of Mark’s anger, to suggest there may be a positive outcome. The brain stem death test is a legal requirement and is used to confirm but not diagnose, i.e. don’t say ‘Well, let’s wait to see what the test shows’. There may be a certain amount of guilt that he was not around and he may blame members of staff or his family. You will be marked on your ability to listen as well as explain and you may have to repeatedly stress that you understand this is a difficult time for him. Make sure that at completion you check you have answered Mark’s questions and that if he has any more at any time he should contact a member of staff.

Mark is likely to want to know what the test involves (see below) and who will be carrying it out.

Clinical brain stem death exam

Establish cause of disease/injury and:  
Coexistence of coma and apnoea Apnoea test; observe for 3 minutes with PCO2 > 60 mmHg
Absence of brain stem function Fully dilated pupils with no light response
Absence of spontaneous eye movement and those produced by doll’s eye movements and water instillation in external auditory meatus  
Corneal and gag reflexes absent  
Normal blood pressure and temperature  
Flaccid muscle tone, no spontaneous movement  
Exam consistent through observation period Two exams over 12–24 hours

COMMENTS ON STATION 9

In may be argued that specialist diabetic management does not fall within

the remit of the first-year specialist registrar. However, diabetes is a common disease and is managed by district general hospitals. Knowledge of the disease is required and, in particular, dealing with the ‘difficult’ teenager is an art form in itself. It must be emphasised that this is outpatient management. A diatribe on acute symptoms is not going to help you pass the station. The scenario revolves around a previously well-controlled child (knowledge of HbA1c levels is assumed) who now has poor control.

You must be aware of and take a thorough history of all aspects of the way diabetes affects children. This involves:

History Notes
Initial diagnosis Age
  Intervention needed (?PICU)
  Length of hospital stay
  Education given
Past management history Number of hospitalisations (including PICU)
  Frequency of monitoring
  Changes of management
  Complications of treatment (lipohypertrophy, hypoglycaemic episodes)
Current treatment Type of insulin and duration of this treatment
  Modifications for sport, etc.
  Frequency of monitoring
  Dietary adaptations (is there a dietician involved?)
Social history Effects on child:
  Understanding of disease and long-term complications
  Effects on friends and school:
  Any involvement in diabetic camps/groups?
  Effect on family:
  Siblings’ understanding of disease
  Involvement of social worker
  Change of family’s diet

The key to the management plan is being able to ascertain what the change has been and coming up with an appropriate way of addressing this issue. It may be that a change in insulin prescription has not been correctly followed up. Advising a diabetic nurse review of the doses/glucose monitoring while awaiting specialist follow-up may simply be the answer. However, it is more likely there are a number of issues pertaining to Steven’s adolescence.

Monitoring may well be less rigid than previously and at this stage in Steven’s life a night spent drinking has much more short-term gain than long-term good glucose control! It is important to give encouragement rather than chastisement. Management of psychological issues must make use of 98 the whole family and may involve support groups or individual counselling in some cases. Diabetic nurses/social workers are an essential resource but should not be assumed to be involved.