Circuit A

Published on 21/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1338 times

Circuit A

STATION 3

This station assesses your ability to elicit clinical signs:

STATION 4

This station assesses your ability to elicit clinical signs:

STATION 6

This station assesses your ability to assess specifically requested areas in a child with a developmental problem:

STATION 8

This station assesses your ability to communicate appropriate, factually correct information in an effective way within the emotional context of the clinical setting:

STATION 9

This station assesses your ability to take a focused history and explain to the parent your diagnosis or differential management plan:

COMMENTS ON STATION 1

2 OBSERVATION

Before you begin your hands-on exam ask ‘mum’ to remove any clothing. It will be impossible to pass a station if you miss a scar and you cannot claim you have thoroughly looked unless the chest is exposed.

With a child of this age observation is absolutely vital as it should give you enough information to make a sensible list of possible diagnoses. In the above scenario we need to simply stand back and take a look for a minute.

We note that she sits without oxygen and is not cyanosed or dyspnoeic.

We look more carefully and notice she is small for her age, has plagiocephaly and on inspection of the dorsum of her hands has multiple scars, presumably from previous venepuncture.

As mum distracts her and removes her T-shirt you carefully inspect her chest and both axillae. Now you can see a healed left lateral thoracotomy incision. She has had surgery for either:

In the absence of a central sternotomy scar she has not had a BT shunt as she is pink. Remember, a BT shunt is a palliative procedure and will not reverse the cause of the cyanosis. PA banding is used to prepare the vessels for a Fontan procedure but again will not correct the cyanosis until a more definitive repair has been performed. This leaves (given that this is a cardiac station) only a PDA or coarctation repair as possibilities. We know her pulses are normal, although if the coarctation has been repaired then obviously you will be able to feel the femoral pulse. In this situation, if a classical repair has been used then the left radial pulse should be weak. Balloon dilatation of the coarctation is unlikely to show any discernible difference. So theoretically the child may have had an aortic coarctation or a PDA but we know she shows signs of being premature. Therefore, if Hannah became very distressed and uncooperative you would be able to say to the examiner:

In this way you should be able to pass the station without ever having heard a heart sound! Obviously this system is not so helpful if the primary lesion is a ventriculoseptal defect! But to give yourself at least a sporting chance it is vital you use all the clues you are given.

COMMENTS ON STATION 2

DIAGNOSIS: KIDNEY TRANSPLANT

Obviously it is vital to palpate the mass in this station, and only regular practice of feeling abdomens (easily overlooked in favour of the more classic chest exam) will help you do this. However, you need to know what the mass is to make sense of the station. The common pelvic masses – and note pelvic, not abdominal – are:

Simon has signs of a chronic disease (pallor, suboptimal growth, multiple surgery). This situation would fit very well with chronic renal disease and a kidney transplant. Simon had developed chronic renal failure secondary due to vesicoureteric reflux complicated by persistent and undertreated/missed urinary tract infection. He required peritoneal dialysis (hence two hypochondrial scars) and a short period of haemodialysis (hence the healed central line scar close to the clavicle) and was later successfully transplanted with a donor kidney. Easy when you know! You wouldn’t be able to tell the cause of the chronic renal failure in this case but must know the common causes and any potential features to look for.

It is useful to commit a list of investigations to memory as some are specific for renal problems and just saying, ‘FBC, U&Es, CRP’ etc. is unlikely to win you any favours.

Monitoring

Iron studies

Renal function

Causes of chronic renal failure

Disease Cause Features
Renal scarring Multiple UTIs Vesicoureteric reflux Has the child got spina bifida?
Glomerulonephritis Henoch-Schönlein purpura Any joint swelling or arthralgia?
  Vasculitides Purpura?
Hereditary Polycystic kidney disease Are the parents well?
  Cystinosis Hearing difficulty?
Alport’s syndrome    
Congenital dysplasia    
Systemic Tumours  
  SLE Butterfly rash

Nutritional status

Renal osteodystrophy

Renal imaging

Complications of chronic renal failure (or more relevantly features to look for and so avoid deterioration) are split between those of the disease or those of the surgical treatment (i.e., transplant).

Prior to the exam make sure you get to see a few children with renal problems as they are not uncommon in the exam. Be familiar with the appearance and location of peritoneal dialysis catheters and central lines used for haemodialysis. Renal nurses are a mine of useful information in this regard.

Remember, there is a significant psychosocial burden and counselling, family therapy and social service input may have to be sought.

At the end of your abdominal exam remember your caveat: ‘I would like to complete my examination by performing a blood pressure, urinalysis and plotting on a growth chart appropriate for age and sex’.

CAN YOU …

List the investigations you would perform in a child you suspect has chronic renal failure?

Pre-treatment Treatment Post-treatment PASS
Hypertension Control medically:
Beta-blocker (care asthma)
Furosemide (care potassium)
Must involve nephrologists
Dialysis – complications
Peritonitis
Volume depletion
Dialysate leakage
Transplant -complications
Infection – particularly
CMV
Must prevent UTI
Rejection
Immunosuppression
Metabolic acidosis Sodium citrate solutions (care: sodium may worsen hypertension)  
Growth failure Growth hormone  
Renal osteodystrophy Dietary phosphate restriction Phosphate binders
Vitamin D
 
Uraemic symptoms (anorexia, nausea and lethargy) Dietary protein restriction  
Anaemia Erythropoietin  
Seizures (hypertensive or electrolyte imbalance)    
If poor concentrating power:    
Polyuria    
Salt wasting    

REMINDER

COMMENTS ON STATION 3

DIAGNOSIS: PREVIOUS MASTOIDECTOMY

Severe, untreated otitis media may present with a facial nerve palsy. It is uncommon in the United Kingdom (but not unheard of) due to the use of antibiotics. In fact there is a feeling in some countries that mastoiditis is on 32 the increase as GPs use antibiotics less for otitis media.

Although we rarely use tuning forks in clinical practice it is one of those things that occasionally comes up in the exam and can flummox candidates if you don’t refresh your memory. Tuning fork tests are based on the principle that sound should travel better through air than through bone in the absence of hearing impairment. Weber’s test is performed by placing a vibrating 512 Hz tuning fork on the vertex of the skull. If the patient, when asked, can hear the sound louder on one side compared to the other then this is abnormal. The side the sound is localised to indicates conductive hearing loss on that side or sensory hearing loss on the contralateral side. Rinne’s test involves placing a vibrating fork next to the pinna (testing air conduction) and then behind the pinna on the mastoid process (testing bone conduction). If the sound is heard better through air than through bone then it is said to be Rinne’s positive and vice versa. Rinne’s test is positive in sensorineural hearing loss or normal hearing and negative in conductive hearing loss.

In this case:

One word of warning – and ignore this if you think it will confuse you: with the above findings it is still possible that there is a sensorineural or perceptive defect on the right side. This is because Rinne’s may be positive on the right because of a sensorineural deficit (and not due to normal hearing). The Weber’s lateralises to the left because there is some bone conduction on the left side. It would be unlucky to have had mastoiditis on the left side and have a sensorineural deafness on the right. You should be aware of this if asked, although it is probably best not to volunteer that information.

It is important to be able to quickly examine different cranial nerves. You are unlikely to be expected to perform an examination of all the nerves due to time constraints. Practise, practise, practise, as being slick under pressure is important and the cranial nerve exam is easy to perform on housemates.

Bell’s palsy is an easy condition to bring to the exam. There is some variation in textbooks as to recovery but as a general rule:

You must remember that methylcellulose eye-drops (artificial tears) need to be prescribed and the eye may need to be taped at night. The use of steroids depends on local guidelines but a short 2 mg/kg course is often recommended.

COMMENTS ON STATION 4

DIAGNOSIS: ATOPIC ECZEMA

The moral of this story is: stick to your guns! The patient in this case does have atopic eczema and mild asthma. He is currently well, however, and has no clinical signs of asthma. Never make up clinical signs as it will land you in a whole heap of trouble. The examiners want to see safe, reliable doctors and not imaginative ones! They need to be confident that when phoned at 3 o’clock in the morning you have not made up signs to fit a given clinical picture. If you think you may have difficulty saying there are no clinical signs when you think there should be, then you can always acknowledge this:

Each centre will have a variety of patients with a variety of clinical signs. Not all of them will be obvious or even present at the time of the exam. Be prepared for this. Also, make sure that you read the question. In the above question you were asked to listen to the chest (as opposed to examining the respiratory system). Don’t waste the examiner’s time or your own by starting at the hands. The examiner will probably have other tasks he wants you to perform.

You should have a sound understanding of the management of basic paediatric problems that you are likely to see in clinic as an SpR, such as eczema and asthma.

Ezcema

Diagnosis May present in infancy onwards
  Family or personal history of atopy
Management: non-medical Switch to a non-biological washing powder
  Trim fi ngernails
  Use mittens in the persistent child
Management: medical Emollient: Apply generously. Examples include 50:50 paraffin.
  Avoid soap and use bath oils such as Oilatum. Some bath oils include antiseptic, such as Emulsiderm
  Steroid cream: Use sparingly on troublesome areas. Be wary of using too high a strength. 0.5–1% hydrocortisone on the face or on babies.
  Stronger steroid creams include:

  Creams can be used on the body of older children if only for short periods of time. The fl exures are prone to atrophy with prolonged treatment. Oral steroid (prednisolone) has a role in diffi cult or acute eczema   Topical tacrolimus ointment: A newer treatment. 0.03% cream may be suitable in children where topical steroid has not worked or they are at particular risk of steroid skin atrophy.   Normally initiated by a dermatologist   Wet wraps: Potassium permanganate soaks may be used or ichthammol bandages over steroid and emollient held in place by Tubigrip. These are changed every 1–3 days   Antimicrobials: Systemic antibiotics generally preferred if indicated. Intravenous antibiotics are sometimes indicated in more severe cases of infected eczema. Herpetic eczema is an emergency requiring treatment with acyclovir   Immunosuppressants: These may be required in severe refractory eczema under the guidance of a dermatologist.   Ciclosporin and azathioprine are the more commonly used drugs of choice

COMMENTS ON STATION 5

DIAGNOSIS: WILLIAMS’ SYNDROME

This question is another example of the need to be versatile. You may be asked to perform small, separate tasks. In this question it is important to be able to interact well with a child and think on your feet. Don’t be thrown by simple questions such as ‘Look at this. What do you think?’ – a difficult skill to revise for but may be practised by asking friends to pretend to be syndromes and feed you snippets of their features until you recognise them. You may not be able to spot the particular feature in the exam but you will start to learn certain patterns of abnormality.

We learn quite quickly from Nicola that she has some intellectual impairment and soft dysmorphic features, so any number of general questions may be appropriate.

We then see that Nicola has evidence of previous cardiac surgery with no residual murmurs. It is impossible to say what surgery she has had, although the absence of thoracotomy scars indicates that a shunting procedure was unnecessary.

So … dysmorphic features; intellectual impairment; cardiac problems. There are a few syndromes that may have this collection of difficulties:

(Tuberous sclerosis and neurofibromatosis do not have cardiac defects as part of their clinical and associated features.)

The other clue we have above is her very happy, chatty demeanour.

This is characteristic of Williams’ syndrome (and Down’s but the phenotypic features are not present). In the case of Williams’ the textbooks would describe it as ‘cocktail party chatter’ but do not expect this to be obviously apparent. There is no substitution for actually having seen the condition described as opposed to having simply read about it.

REMINDER

Williams’ syndrome

Facial Systemic Clinical
Prominent lips Hypoplastic nails Transient neonatal hypercalcaemia
Blue eyes Supravalvular aorticstenosis Mild IUGR
Microdontia Pulmonary artery stenosis Mild microcephaly
Snub nose Renal artery stenosis Mild learning difficulties
Medial eyebrow flare    
Stellate pattern to iris    
Short palpebral fissures    

COMMENTS ON STATION 6

DIAGNOSIS: ISOLATED SPEECH DELAY/SPEECH DIFFICULTY

As is emphasised repeatedly in the book, it is vital to have a fluid understanding of key developmental stages. You should be able to pick out the following features:

Although the station implied delayed speech and language, the question demanded a complete developmental age assessment. Without doing any formal assessment the above has already given you a good framework in which to calculate any potential delays. In this brief segment you see a child who is probably 18–24 months with a potential speech and hearing delay.

However, it is likely the child has a good vocabulary and the problem is with articulation. You can test this by asking her to point to and then say the name of well-recognisable objects.

When listening to speech it is important to appreciate the difference between:

It is important to exclude factors such as poor input at home. This would suggest emotional deprivation or simply that parents do not or are unable to speak to their child regularly at home. Bear in mind autism, cerebral palsy or generalised developmental delay.

It is also important to remember that language problems may be receptive or expressive. Receptive language develops earlier and may begin to become appreciable from the age of 9 months. By the first year of life the child may understand 20–50 words. There is a sudden acceleration in both components from approximately 18 months. An expressive disorder may be present when the child’s vocabulary is actually quite good. A child may be able to point to multiple named objects but not able to say them.

It is difficult to know if Helen’s speech problems are part of a normal spectrum of delayed adequate phonation or represent a specific mechanical problem. In the absence of other features of developmental delay it would be most appropriate to refer this child to a speech and language therapist or health visitor. It may be that a speech and language therapist will delay active therapy until the child is older, however.

COMMENTS ON STATION 7

The key to success in the communication skills is not only having the required communication skills to impress the examiner with your empathy, non-lexical utterances and engagement but also to provide the information the question asks for. In this scenario you are going to have to spend some time obtaining background on the mother’s understanding of her child’s condition (why is she not picking up repeat prescriptions?), explaining the need for regular medication and then giving generic advice on smoking. It is vital you do not get too involved in Laura’s current state of health and how Laura is being managed at the moment. The role-player will not drag you down this route but will not stop you if you do!

The station is underpinned by how Laura’s mother understands asthma. Has she been poorly informed on previous admissions and is not using medication correctly? Or is there an element of neglect in her care of her child? It is unlikely you will be given a child protection issue to investigate, although you must acknowledge to the examiner by your questions that you may be concerned by this:

The role-player will have been given background on her character (which you will not be party to) and will have an individual interpretation on this. Examples may be:

You are: The mother of one child, Laura, who was diagnosed with asthma a year ago.

Background information: You are a busy single working mother who is struggling with working and raising a child at the same time. Laura is repeatedly unwell and has required multiple hospital admissions. On each occasion you have found the doctors too busy to take a little extra time to explain Laura’s treatment plan with you. You did not want to impose on them and were grateful to leave the hospital quickly so you could get back to work. The inhalers you have been given seem still to be working, so you have never felt the need to pick up further prescriptions.

Your general feelings:

After the doctor has explained the situation to you, your feelings and possible further questions may be:

Compare the above story with the following:

You are: The mother of five children. Laura, the middle of the five, was diagnosed with asthma a year ago.

Background information: Three of your children have or have had asthma, of whom Laura is the youngest. Your oldest child, now twelve, appears to have grown out of his asthma. The second oldest, 7 years old, is very rarely ill although it appears your 1½-year-old is developing symptoms. You also have a 2-month-old child.

You are confident in dealing with asthma but do not acknowledge that Laura appears to have been into hospital much more frequently than her siblings. You have been using her older brother’s inhaler to avoid having to go to the GP.

Both yourself and your partner are heavy smokers but never smoke in the same room as your children. Your mother smoked when you were younger and you don’t appear to have come to any harm.

Your general feelings:

After the doctor has explained the situation to you, your feelings and possible further questions may be:

Obviously these are very different scenarios, although the information presented to you is the same. Being open to or trying to predict the background information will help you form a framework for the station. In this situation it is obviously vital to discover how many children the mother has, but you may not necessarily think to ask that question.

It will be useful to practise making up scenarios with colleagues (who are preferably taking the exam).

COMMENTS ON STATION 8

The communication station is always underpinned by having a thorough knowledge of the subject being discussed. It is assumed that the candidate knows the required technique, base knowledge or has the requested information to answer the child’s or parent’s question. If candidates display to the examiner a lack of understanding of the basic principles required of a specialist registrar, it will be difficult to justify a pass regardless of the strength of their communication skills. This station requires that you actually know how to explain the science behind the hip exam, not just simply push the hips open and closed. The emphasis will be on your ability to communicate an apparently simple procedure, albeit with a complex mechanism, in a concise and informative manner.

1. Introduce yourself. Ask the student’s name and understanding of the topic.

2. Explain the objectives of the session:

3. Neonatal hip examination is a screening procedure carried out on every child born in the UK. The screening is for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH); avoid the term ‘congenital dislocation’. There is a repeat test by the GP at 6 weeks of age.

4. DDH may present with asymmetrical skin creases or an apparent shortening of the femur (Galeazzi’s sign). These features are unlikely to present at birth and are more likely to be apparent at the 6-week check.

5. You must inform the parents that you will be opening and closing the hips. This will not hurt the child but they may not like the sensation and so may become upset.

6. Barlow’s test: The child must be lying on their back with the hips flexed at approximately 90° to the abdomen and heels touching the buttocks. Keeping the knee fully flexed, place your thumb on the medial condyle of the femur. Your fingers should be placed on the greater trochanter so that you have complete control of the femur and will not be touching the hip. These landmarks may be difficult to find in the chunky neonate. It is most important that the student is seen to have a good grip on the femur and has their thumb on the medial aspect and fingers on the lateral aspect of the thigh. Pushing down on the hip following a line of force through the femur may demonstrate the ‘clunk’ of hip dislocation – a positive Barlow’s test.

7. Ortolani’s test: This test relocates a dislocated hip. With hands in the same position as in Barlow’s test, you must simultaneously abduct (open out) the hips and provide an anterior force on the femur (i.e., the opposite to Barlow’s test). This may produce the ‘clunk’ of reduction – a positive Ortolani test.

8. In practice, both hips are examined at the same time and both Barlow’s and Ortolani’s tests are performed in one ‘in and out’ motion. For the purposes of student demonstration it may be best to focus on one hip and one procedure.

9. The hip dummy tends to have one hip which obviously comes out of place. If this is the case the student must demonstrate his ability to produce and recognise hip dislocation. You will fail the station if there is the possibility the student may not be able to correctly identify DDH. You will not fail the station if you run out of time.

10. Ask the student to demonstrate their understanding by asking them to roleplay an exam with you as parent of the hip dummy. He must introduce himself, explain the procedure and perform the test. If you have time you can then discuss what he would say to parents if the test is positive.

COMMENTS ON STATION 9

Taking a history in itself is a simple task by now and something we all do on a day-to-day basis. The key to this station is asking the relevant questions pertinent to the scenario. In this situation the examiner would certainly forgive you for not asking about immunisations and allergies but would expect a detailed probe into her disabilities. Time in this station is pressured. Pressure contributes to mistakes. Mistakes contribute to failing.

The following is a review of Tamsin’s history. Assume that Tamsin and her mother would not have revealed information without a direct question about that information. Write down the questions you would have asked Tamsin. How much of the following information would you have gleaned?

None of the above is really ‘medical’. Obtaining the above information is vital as without it you will not pass the station. Of course, it is important to classify the type of arthritis, previous and current treatment, presence of antibodies, etc., but the child’s functional ability will be of more interest to the examiner. Remember you are not the on-call SHO but the clinic-based registrar for this station.

There are many reasons why Tamsin may find it difficult to go back to school.

Emotionally:

Physically:

To enable Tamsin’s return to school many people need to be involved:

By getting all these people together plans can be put into place to enable Tamsin to return to school. This is what the examiner will be looking for.