CHAPTER 56 Chemotherapy and Experimental Medical Therapies for Meningiomas
INTRODUCTION
Current therapies for meningiomas include surgery, radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery.1–9 For the majority of patients with benign meningiomas (World Health Organization [WHO] grade I) and a subset of patients with atypical meningiomas (WHO grade II), these therapies are effective in achieving tumor control. However, there is an important group of patients with inoperable or higher grade tumors who develop recurrent disease after surgery and radiation therapy. The treatment options for these patients are currently inadequate.
The WHO classification scheme for meningiomas is based on the degree of anaplasia, number of mitoses, and presence of necrosis.10 Histological grading is important because it helps to predict the likelihood of recurrence. Benign meningiomas account for more than 90% of tumors and have a low risk of recurrence (7%–20%).10–12 Atypical meningiomas are much less common. They account for 4.7% to 7.2% of meningiomas and are associated with a 40% recurrence rate despite surgical resection.12 Malignant meningiomas represent only 1% to 2.8% of meningiomas but recur in 50% to 80% of cases and usually result in death within 2 years of diagnosis.10,11 Patients with meningiomas of any histological grade that recur after surgery and radiation therapy are frequently considered for chemotherapy or experimental medical therapies.
CYTOTOXIC CHEMOTHERAPY
To date, chemotherapy has had only a very limited role in the treatment of meningiomas. Data from small clinical trials and case series suggest that most chemotherapeutic agents have minimal activity against meningiomas.5,6,13,14 The evaluation of chemotherapy has also been complicated by the lack of data regarding the natural history of untreated meningiomas. Many chemotherapy studies report variable periods of disease stabilization, but it is difficult to know whether this represents an improvement because benign meningiomas grow slowly and may appear radiographically stable for prolonged periods.15,16
In general, chemotherapeutic regimens (such as dacarbazine and Adriamycin) that have activity in other soft tissue tumors have produced disappointing results in patients with meningiomas.6 Hydroxyurea, an oral ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor, arrests meningioma cell growth in the S phase of the cell cycle and induces apoptosis.17 In a preliminary report, hydroxyurea (1000–1500 mg/day; 20 mg/kg/day) decreased tumor size in three patients with recurrent benign meningiomas and prevented recurrent disease for 24 months in a patient with a completely resected malignant meningioma.18 Several more recent studies suggest that hydroxyurea has modest activity; responses are uncommon but some patients appear to have disease stabilization.19–23 The Southwest Oncology Group conducted a phase II study to further evaluate the role of hydroxyurea in meningiomas (SWOG-S9811). This study is closed to accrual but the final results are not yet available.
There have been reports of small numbers of patients with malignant meningiomas who responded to recombinant interferon alpha-2b.24,25 Temozolomide (Temodar, TMZ), an alkylating agent with activity in malignant gliomas, was evaluated in 16 patients with refractory meningiomas and showed negligible activity.26 The topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) caused moderate toxicity in 16 patients with benign meningiomas and had no demonstrable activity.27 A large number of cytotoxic agents are under evaluation for sarcomas and other systemic malignancies.28 Most of these have not been evaluated in meningiomas, and it is possible that some may have modest activity. However, it is likely that the more novel therapeutic approaches discussed in the text that follows will provide a greater chance of improving the outcome for patients with recurrent meningiomas.
CHALLENGES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE MEDICAL THERAPIES FOR MENINGIOMAS
In contrast to the extensive understanding of the molecular pathogenesis and biology of systemic malignancies, and even brain tumors such as malignant gliomas, relatively little is known about the molecular pathogenesis of meningiomas and the critical molecular changes driving tumor growth.11,12,29,30 Overexpression of various growth factors including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and their receptors, and signal transduction pathways such as the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt, and phospholipase C (PLC)-γ1-protein kinase C (PKC) pathways have been implicated, but their relative significance is largely unknown.29,30 As a result, the most important molecular targets may remain to be elucidated.
Another factor limiting progress in the development of more effective therapies for meningiomas is the lack of robust cell lines and animal models. There is a need for animal models that replicate the genetic changes in meningiomas with a high frequency of spontaneous meningioma development, benign meningioma lines for in vitro and in vivo studies, and meningeal specific promoters. Many of the existing meningioma cell lines are derived from malignant meningiomas and likely contain culture-induced artifacts and lack progesterone receptors.12 There are some orthotopic31,32 and genetic models33 in development that appear promising. Recently, two cell lines were developed from benign meningioma specimens via immortalization with human telomerase reverse transcriptase and SV40 large T antigen. Orthotopic tumors with similar immunostaining patterns to human meningiomas were established from both cell lines in athymic nude mice.31 Another model uses a Cre recombinase technology to inactivate NF2 in arachnoid cells, resulting in intracranial meningothelial hyperplasia and meningiomas in 30% of mice.33 These models may aid in the preclinical evaluation of novel therapies.
A final factor limiting progress is the relatively small number of patients with meningiomas who require additional therapies after treatment with surgery and radiation therapy. In general, there is little incentive for pharmaceutical companies to evaluate their therapies in meningiomas because of the small potential market. Hopefully as the molecular pathogenesis of these tumors becomes better understood, a compelling case can be made for evaluating specific agents directed at critical molecular targets. In the next section, targeted molecular drugs that have a potential role against meningiomas are reviewed in detail. These therapies have also been discussed in recent review articles.2,5,30,34
EXPERIMENTAL THERAPIES: TARGETED MOLECULAR AGENTS
Recently, it has become apparent that many human diseases result from aberrations in cell signaling pathways. Protein-tyrosine kinases play a fundamental role in signal transduction, and deregulated activity of these enzymes has been observed in many cancers. Therefore, specific inhibitors of tyrosine kinases could have potential therapeutic applications in the treatment of cancer, with potentially lower toxicity and/or higher, prolonged response rates.35,36 The prototypical targeted molecular agent is imatinib mesylate (Gleevec), which has shown significant benefit in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)37 and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).38 There is also a growing experience with targeted molecular agents in malignant gliomas.39–41 However, to date, there have been minimal data on the use of these agents in meningiomas.
In contrast to the extensive work aimed at understanding the genetics of meningiomas, relatively little work has been conducted to understand the growth factors and their receptors, and the signal transduction pathways that are critical to meningioma growth.2,5,30 PDGF, EGF, VEGF, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), and their receptor tyrosine kinases, together with their downstream signaling pathways including the Ras/MAPK pathway, the PI3K/Akt pathway, the PLC-γ1-PKC pathway, and the TGF-β-SMAD pathways, are all thought to be important in meningioma growth (Fig. 56-1).30
Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor
PDGF is a fundamental driver of cell proliferation in normal development and in a variety of pathological conditions, including cancer.42 Accumulating evidence suggests that PDGF plays an important role in meningioma growth.43–47 Most meningiomas of all histologic grades express PDGF ligands AA and BB and the PDGF-beta receptor (PDGF-βR).43–47 Expression levels may be higher in atypical and malignant meningiomas than in benign meningiomas.45 Laboratory data suggest that an autocrine PDGF loop supports meningioma cell growth and maintenance.47 When PDGF-BB is applied to cultured meningioma cells, MAPK48 and c-fos49 are activated and tumor cell proliferation is enhanced. Conversely, anti-PDGF-BB antibodies inhibit cell growth.50 These data provide sound rationale for testing PDGF inhibitors in meningioma patients.
Imatinib is a potent inhibitor of the Bcr-Abl, PDGF-α and β receptors, and c-Kit tyrosine kinases.51 Its ability to inhibit PDGFR with an IC50 of 0.1 μM suggested that it may have therapeutic potential in meningiomas. The North American Brain Tumor Consortium (NABTC) conducted a phase II study of imatinib in patients with recurrent meningiomas (NABTC 01-08).52 Patients were stratified into two cohorts: (1) benign meningiomas or (2) atypical and malignant meningiomas. As imatinib is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system (3A4), patients could not be receiving enzyme inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs). Patients initially received 600 mg/day of imatinib; the dose was increased in the second cycle to 800 mg/day if no significant toxicity was observed in the first cycle. Twenty-three patients were enrolled into the study (13 with meningiomas, 5 with atypical meningiomas, and 5 with malignant meningiomas). Though the treatment was generally well tolerated, imatinib had minimal activity. Of the 19 patients evaluable for response, 10 progressed at the first scan and 9 were stable. There were no radiographic responses. Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 months (range 0.7 to 18 months); 6-month PFS was 29.4%. For benign meningiomas, median PFS was 3 months; 6-month PFS was 45%. For the atypical and malignant meningiomas, median PFS was 2 months; 6-month PFS was 0%. Several other inhibitors of PDGF are undergoing evaluation such as sunitinib, MLN518, dasatinib, AMN 107, pazopanib, CP673451 and CHIR 265. Some of these, such as MLN518, are more potent PDGFR inhibitors than imatinib, whereas others target additional kinases that are potentially important in meningiomas. For example, pazopanib also inhibits VEGF receptors (VEGFR) 1, 2, and 3 as well as c-Kit, while CHIR 265 inhibits VEGFR, c-Kit and Raf. These drugs may be more effective than imatinib as monotherapy against meningiomas.
There is also interest in combining imatinib with hydroxyurea, the cytotoxic chemotherapy agent with the most activity in meningiomas. Though a recent phase I/II trial of imatinib as monotherapy for recurrent malignant glioma showed minimal activity,53 a study of 33 recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients treated with the combination of imatinib mesylate (400 mg/day or 500 mg twice/day, depending on concurrent EIAED use) and hydroxyurea (500 mg twice/day), had encouraging results.54 After a median follow-up period of 58 weeks, 1 patient achieved a complete response, 2 achieved a partial response, and 14 achieved stable disease. Six-month PFS was 27%, and the median PFS was 14.4 weeks. In light of these results in patients with recurrent GBM, a multicenter phase II trial of the combination for patients with recurrent or progressive meningiomas after surgery is currently in progress (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00354913). Twenty-one patients are expected to enroll, and monitoring includes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and clinical examinations every 8 weeks.
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
The EGFR is overexpressed in more than 60% of meningiomas.55–61 EGF and TGF-β activate these receptors and stimulate meningioma growth in vitro,30,56 supporting the concept that activation of EGFRs in human meningiomas by autocrine/paracrine stimulation may contribute to their proliferation. Increased TGF-β immunoreactivity in meningiomas has been associated with aggressive growth.30,61,62
In addition to gefitinib and erlotinib, there are a large number of other agents currently undergoing evaluation. These inhibit EGFR alone, or together with other receptor tyrosine kinases, which may have therapeutic potential in meningiomas (Table 56-1). For example, lapatinib inhibits EGFR and HER2, HKI-272 inhibits all subtypes of the EGFR, and ZD6474 (Zactima) inhibits EGFR and VEGFR. Although EGFR monoclonal antibodies have been effective for some systemic malignancies (e.g., cetuximab in colorectal cancer), they have generally not been used for brain tumors because of the concern regarding the ability of these agents to pass through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in sufficient concentrations to produce a therapeutic effect. Because the BBB is not a factor in most meningiomas, it is possible that these antibodies may be effective in these tumors. To date very few studies have evaluated the therapeutic potential of these agents in meningiomas. In a phase I study of a murine monoclonal antibody against EGFR in nine patients with either gliomas or meningiomas, treatment was reasonably well tolerated. No radiographic responses were detected, but efficacy data is difficult to interpret in a study with so few subjects.63 Currently, several anti-EGFR antibodies are undergoing evaluation for other malignancies such as cetuximab, panitumumab, EMD 72000, nimotuzumab, and mAb 806. Trials of these agents in meningiomas may be worthwhile, especially if combined with correlative studies examining whether the antibodies can achieve therapeutic concentrations in meningiomas and inhibit EGFR in vivo.
Class/agent | Alternative name(s) | Mechanism(s) |
---|---|---|
Apoptosis enhancers | ||
ABT737 | Bcl-2 inhibitor | |
AT101 | Bcl-2 inhibitor | |
Fenretinide | Multiple targets | |
GX15-070 | Bcl-2 inhibitor | |
Integrin inhibitor | ||
Cilengitide | αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrin inhibitor | |
Cell cycle inhibitors | ||
AG024322 | pan-CDK inhibitor | |
AZ703 | CDK 2, 1 inhibitor | |
BMS-387032 | CDK 2, 1 inhibitor | |
CINK4 | CDK 4, 6 inhibitor | |
E7070 | Unknown | |
Flavopiridol | pan-CDK inhibitor | |
PD-0332991 | CDK 4, 6 inhibitor | |
Seliciclib | CDK 2, 1 inhibitor | |
c-MET (HGF/SF) inhibitors | ||
AMG-102 | HGF/SF antibody | |
XL880 | c-MET, VEGFR2, PDGFR, c-Kit, Tie-2 inhibitor | |
EGFR inhibitors | ||
AEE788 | EGFR, VEGFR inhibitor | |
BIBW 2992 | EGFR, HER2 inhibitor | |
Cetuximab | Erbitux | EGFR antibody |
EMD 72000 | EGFR antibody | |
Erlotinib | OSI-774, Tarceva | EGFR inhibitor |
Gefitinib | ZD1839, Iressa | EGFR inhibitor |
HKI-272 | pan-EGFR inhibitor | |
Lapatinib | GW-572016 | EGFR, HER2 inhibitor |
mAb 806 | EGFR antibody | |
Nimotuzumab | TheraCIM | EGFR antibody |
Panitumumab | Vectibix | EGFR antibody |
ZD6474 | Zactima | EGFR, VEGFR inhibitor |
Endothelin-A inhibitors | ||
Astrasentan | Xinlay | ETA inhibitor |
ZD4054 | ETA inhibitor | |
Farnesyltransferase inhibitors | ||
Lonafarnib | SCH 66336, Sarasar | FT inhibitor |
Tipifarnib | R115777, Zarnestra | FT inhibitor |
Histone deacetylase inhibitors | ||
Depsipeptide | HDAC inhibitor | |
Voronistat | Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) | HDAC inhibitor |
Valproic acid | HDAC inhibitor | |
HSP-90 inhibitors | ||
17AAG | HSP-90 inhibitor | |
17DMAG | HSP-90 inhibitor | |
IPI504 | HSP-90 inhibitor | |
MEK inhibitors | ||
AZD6244 | MEK inhibitor | |
PD0325901 | MEK inhibitor | |
mTOR inhibitors | ||
AP23573 | mTOR inhibitor | |
Everolimus | RAD001 | mTOR inhibitor |
Rapamycin | mTOR inhibitor | |
Temsirolimis | CCI-779, Torisel | mTOR inhibitor |
PDGFR inhibitors | ||
AMN 107 | PDGFR, c-Kit, Bcr-Abl inhibitor | |
CHIR 265 | PDGFR, Raf, VEGFR, c-Kit inhibitor | |
CP-673-451 | ||
Dasatinib | PDGFR, Src, c-Kit, ephrin A inhibitor | |
Imatinib mesylate | Gleevec | |
MLN518 | PDGFR, c-Kit inhibitor | |
Pazopanib | GW786034 | PDGFR, VEGFR, c-Kit inhibitor |
Sunitinib | Sutent | PDGFR, VEGFR, c-Kit inhibitor |
Vatalanib | PTK787 | PDGFR, VEGFR inhibitor |
XL-999 | PDGFR, VEGFR, FGFR inhibitor | |
PKC β2 inhibitor | ||
Enzastaurin | LY31761 | PKC β2 inhibitor |
PI3K inhibitor | ||
BEZ235 | PI3K inhibitor | |
Proteasome inhibitor | ||
Bortezomib | Velcade | Proteasome inhibitor |
Raf kinase inhibitor | ||
Sorafenib | Nexavar, BAY 43-9006 | Raf kinase, VEGFR, PDGFR inhibitor |
Src inhibitor | ||
AZD0530 | Src inhibitor | |
TGF-β inhibitors | ||
AP 12009 | TGF-β2 antisense oligonucleotide | |
GC1008 | TGF-β antibody | |
SB-431542 | TGF-β receptor inhibitor | |
VEGF inhibitors | ||
Bevacizumab | Avastin | VEGF antibody |
VEGF trap | VEGF soluble decoy receptor | |
VEGFR inhibitors | ||
AEE788 | VEGFR, EGFR inhibitor | |
AG013736 | VEGFR inhibitor | |
AMG 706 | VEGFR inhibitor | |
AZD2171 | VEGFR inhibitor | |
CEP-7055 | VEGFR inhibitor | |
CHIR 265 |