Case 19

Published on 03/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1109 times

Case 19

HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Progressive weakness developed over 7 months in the left hand of a 53-year-old right-handed woman. Initially, she noted that she had difficulty picking up small objects, buttoning shirts, or pulling snaps. This worsened and she recently has been unable to use her left hand to assist during meals. The weakness had not affected her left upper arm and her right upper extremity was normal. She denied any limb or neck pain, numbness, or cramps. She denied any bulbar, ocular, cognitive, or sphincteric symptoms.

Her medical history was relevant for diabetes mellitus since 45 years of age, hypertension, and cigarette smoking. She takes insulin injections and furosemide. There is no family history of neuromuscular disorder.

On examination, she had normal mental status and cranial nerves. There was no facial weakness, neck weakness, or tongue atrophy or fasciculations. She had slight atrophy of all intrinsic muscles of the left hand only. No fasciculations were observed. Tone was normal. There was moderate weakness that was restricted to the left upper extremity muscles. Manual muscle examination, using Medical Research Council (MRC) grading (1 to 5), showed the following:

Deep tendon reflexes were pathologically brisk in both upper extremities, but knee jerks were normal and ankle jerks were absent. Jaw jerk was brisk. She had a right Babinski sign and bilateral Hoffmann signs. Sensory examination was normal to all modalities. Results of gait and cerebellar examinations were normal.

The patient was evaluated by a neurologist who found normal x-rays of the cervical spine. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine revealed mild disk bulging at C3–C4 and C5–C6. An electrodiagnostic (EDX) study of the left upper extremity, done 3 months after onset of symptoms, revealed fibrillations and large motor units in left C7-, C8-, T1-innervated muscles, with normal sensory and motor nerve conduction studies. Because of progressive left hand weakness, the patient was referred for a repeat EDX examination 7 months after the onset of symptoms.

Please now review the Nerve Conduction Studies and Needle EMG tables.

EDX FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

Pertinent EDX findings in this patient include:

These two findings are suggestive of a cervical intraspinal canal lesion, affecting the lower C8/T1 roots or cord segments bilaterally, worse on the left, and producing axonal loss. The slight slowing of motor distal latencies and conduction velocities, and F wave latencies, with values not lower than 70 to 80% of the normal limit, is compatible with an axonal loss lesion, and reflects relative loss of the large, fast-conducting motor fibers. Normal ulnar SNAPs, which derive their fibers from C8 roots, are evidence in support of a preganglionic lesion (i.e., a lesion of the lower cervical roots or cord).

This, when added to the aforementioned findings, might suggest a diffuse intraspinal canal disease, which extends to the lumbosacral roots or cord. However, it should be remembered that selective atrophy of the extensor digitorum brevis is a common finding, of no definite clinical significance; thus, a low-amplitude CMAP, recording EDB, does not automatically indicate a pathologic process at the L5 root, S1 root, or peroneal nerve.

In summary, using strict EDX definitions, the findings are pathognomonic of a diffuse pathologic process that involves all ventral roots or spinal cord segments and produces axonal loss, worse in the left cervical myotomes, with evidence of prominent active (ongoing) denervation. These findings may result from an active polyradiculopathy (such as carcinomatous meningitis), a diffuse myelopathy, or rapidly progressive motor neuron disease (such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). Obviously, this EDX study is most compatible with ALS in this patient due to the associated upper motor neuron findings, as well as the lack of pain or any other sensory manifestations. The extensive denervation seen in this patient is not consistent with diabetic distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy, because of the predominant loss of motor units in the upper extremities, the marked asymmetry, and the preservation of all the SNAPs. Finally, cool extremities result in high (not low) CMAP and SNAP amplitudes with slow latencies.

DISCUSSION

Pathology and Etiology

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a term first coined by Charcot in 1875, is the prototypical disease among disorders of the motor neuron. It is a relentlessly progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disorder caused by loss of both upper motor neurons (UMN) and lower motor neurons (LMN). ALS is usually sporadic while 5 to 10% of cases are familial, usually following an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern.

The pathology of sporadic ALS is represented by the selective loss of motor neurons in the spinal cord and brain stem, and cortical motor neurons (Betz cells). Classic findings on spinal cord sections include the loss of anterior horns, with degeneration of the pyramidal tracts (crossed and uncrossed) and dramatic preservation of the dorsal columns and spinocerebellar tracts. Although all motor neurons ultimately degenerate, there is relative sparing of the oculomotor nuclei in the brain stem and Onuff nucleus in the lumbosacral cord. Microscopically, there is, in addition to the loss of anterior horn motor neurons, frequent accumulation of neurofilaments in surviving neurons and dilatation of axons (“spheroids”). The pathologic findings in familial ALS are identical to those in the sporadic form, except that Lewy-like bodies frequently are identified in surviving motor neurons.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a fatal disorder of unknown etiology. It is likely that there are initiating and propagating factors that lead to motor neuron cell death. Currently, there are five major hypotheses about the development of ALS, although many theories are interrelated:

Clinical Features

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also known as motor neuron disease, Lou Gehrig disease, or maladie de Charcot, occurs in a fairly uniform distribution worldwide with no true differences in geographical incidence, except for small clusters in Guam, the Kii peninsula of Japan, and West New Guinea. The worldwide incidence of ALS is 0.6 to 2.6 per 100 000 population, and its lifetime risk is 1 in 1000. Since 5 to 10% of ALS cases are dominantly inherited, the risk to siblings of a patient with ALS is approximately 2.5 to 5%. The disorder affects both sexes, with a slight preponderance to males. The mean age of onset is 55 years, with a wide range from 17 to 77 years. The illness is fatal within 5 years in 80% of patients; however, some survive as long as 20 years. Patients with initial weakness in the bulbar muscles and older patients have a poorer prognosis for survival. Most patients with ALS die of respiratory failure and fewer than 10% of ALS patients in the United States choose long-term mechanical ventilation to sustain their lives.

More than two-thirds of patients with ALS present with weakness, atrophy, or both. The weakness involves one arm, one leg, or asymmetrically both legs in almost half of patients, while generalized weakness, bilateral upper extremities, or unilateral hemiparesis are less common. Bulbar manifestations are present at onset in a quarter of patients. Fasciculations, cramps, shortness of breath, head drop, or weight loss are rare initial presentations. UMN findings include weakness, spasticity, hyperreflexia, and Babinski and Hoffman signs. LMN findings are usually more pronounced and include weakness, muscle atrophy, fasciculations, and hyporeflexia. Bulbar manifestations in ALS typically include dysarthria, dysphagia, sialorrhea, aspiration, and pseudobulbar affect (inappropriate, spontaneous, forced laughing, crying, or yawning).

A typical patient with ALS is a man in his fifties in whom asymmetrical weakness and atrophy of the muscles develop in one limb, usually those in one hand or one foot. The weakness progresses over time to adjacent myotomes in the same limb and thence to the contralateral limb or the other limb on the same side. The weakness ultimately generalizes to involve all limb, bulbar and respiratory muscles. At its advanced stage, there is usually generalized diffuse muscular atrophy and weakness, fasciculations, spasticity with hyperreflexia, and possibly dysphagia and dysarthria. In typical ALS, there is sparing of sphincteric function, eye movement, sensory function, and cognitive capability.

The diagnosis of ALS is based on the presence of a progressive disorder with the characteristic combination of upper and lower motor neuron involvement. Many criteria have been proposed but most are inadequate, particularly those pertaining to early diagnosis and the definition of upper motor neuron involvement. Among them, the revised El Escorial diagnostic criteria currently are the most widely accepted for the diagnosis of ALS (Table C19-1).

Table C19-1 Revised El-Escorial Criteria for the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

LMN = lower motor neuron; UMN = upper motor neuron.

Although lower motor neuron dysfunction dominates the clinical picture in many patients, there usually is evidence of upper motor neuron involvement as well. Extreme cases of “pure” lower motor neuron or “pure” upper motor neuron involvement exist, but they are less common than classic ALS. Because of this variability and the preponderance to lower or upper motor neurons, ALS variants commonly are separated from the classic form (Table C19-2).

Table C19-2 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Its Variants

Disorder Frequency (%) Characteristics
Sporadic ALS 90–95  
Classic ALS 82 LMN and UMN dysfunctions
LMN-dominant ALS   LMN dysfunctions with subtle UMN signs
UMN-dominant ALS   UMN dysfunctions with subtle or needle EMG signs of LMN dysfunctions
Progressive bulbar palsy 9 Bulbar with or without pseudobulbar dysfunctions
Progressive muscular atrophy 7 Pure LMN dysfunctions
Primary lateral sclerosis 2 Pure UMN dysfunctions
Familial ALS 5–10
Autosomal dominant ALS
SOD 1-linked 20 (2% of ALS) Linked to chromosome 21q22, associated with >50 mutations in gene for Cu, Zn SOD (Ala4 to valine)
Non-SOD 1-linked Not linked to chromosome 21q22
Autosomal recessive ALS Some are linked to chromosome 2q33

ALa4 = alanine4; Cu, Zn SOD = copper-zinc superoxide dismutase; LMN = lower motor neuron; SOD1 = superoxide dismustase; UMN = upper motor neuron.

Although ALS often can be readily diagnosed clinically, especially when both upper and lower motor neuron features are present, a definitive diagnosis sometimes may be difficult to attain, particularly during the early stages of the disease. Table C19-3 lists common disorders that may mimic ALS, thus posing difficulties in the diagnostic process.

Table C19-3 Differential Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

There is no cure for ALS. Treatment options for ALS have been disappointing, although major strides have been made during the past few years. Effort is ongoing to identify drugs with potential effects on the progression of ALS. The various classes of therapy that currently are used or are being investigated in slowing the progression of disease include antiexcitotoxins, nerve growth factors, and neuroprotective agents. Since glutamate excess is neurotoxic, then drugs that decrease synaptic glutamate might be beneficial. These drugs could decrease glutamate release, block postsynaptic receptors (N-methyl-D-aspartate [NMDA] and non-NMDA), decrease glutamate synthesis, or increase glutamate transport. Drugs in this group include riluzole (Rilutek®), which is the only drug that has been approved to treat ALS in the United States. It decreases glutamate release but also blocks voltage-activated sodium channels. Nerve growth factors regulate the survival of developing and mature motor neurons, ameliorate neuron loss in animal models of motor neuron degeneration, and are important in muscle innervation and sprouting. Subcutaneous ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and intraventricular glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) have failed to show benefit or had poorly tolerated adverse effects. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is the most promising in the treatment of ALS, with some evidence that IGF-1 has a positive effect in slowing the progress of human ALS. Neuroprotective agents such vitamin E, deprenyl, and coenzyme Q10 have not yet shown a positive effect.

Electrodiagnosis

Nerve Conduction Studies

Although the major changes in ALS are seen on needle EMG, nerve conduction studies (NCS) should be done in all patients with suspected ALS to exclude other possible causes of weakness. Sensory NCSs are normal, although a subtle decrease in SNAP amplitudes has been reported in a few studies. Motor NCSs may show abnormalities that vary with the stage of disease. Normal study results are not uncommon early in the disease course. Later, low-amplitude CMAPs are frequently revealed; these may be regional (i.e., the result of motor conduction studies performed on weakened limb(s) because of anterior horn cell loss). In more advanced stages of the disease, diffusely low CMAP amplitudes with normal SNAP amplitudes, so called “low motor-normal sensory pattern,” is characteristic. This NCS pattern is not specific for the diagnosis and may be seen in spinal muscular atrophies, diffuse myelopathies or polyradiculopathies, axonal motor polyneuropathies, presynaptic neuromuscular junction disorders, and severe myopathies (see Figure C17–13). In contrast to CMAP amplitudes, motor conduction velocities, distal latencies, and F wave latencies are usually normal in ALS until significant degrees of axon loss have occurred, when mild slowing may be detected due to the loss of large and fast conducting axons. This slowing is proportional to the reduction in CMAP amplitude, and the conduction velocity does not decrease to less than 70 to 80% of the lower limit of normal. Motor conduction block, or significant CMAP temporal dispersion, should raise the suspicion of another disorder that may, at times, mimic motor neuron disease: multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block.

Needle EMG

Needle EMG is the most powerful tool in confirming the diagnosis of ALS. Needle EMG findings in motor neuron disease in general and in ALS in particular are dependent on the extent of lower motor neuron degeneration. Changes seen on needle EMG consist of abnormal spontaneous activity and loss of motor neurons; this loss is characterized by impaired MUAP recruitment and altered MUAP configuration that is consistent with reinnervation.

Fasciculation potentials are sporadic or quasi-rhythmic, spontaneous (involuntary) contractions of a group of muscle fibers that are innervated by a single motor unit. They can be of any shape and size, depending on the motor units from which they arise (Figure C19-1). They reflect irritability of the motor unit and usually originate from the distal nerve terminals, with spread by axon reflex to other parts of the unit. They frequently are visible on inspection. During needle EMG, fasciculation potentials are characterized by a random firing pattern. Fasciculations are particularly prominent in patients with ALS and have been closely linked to the disease since its first description by Charcot. Using simultaneous multichannel EMG recordings from different sites and muscles, it has been estimated that more than 90% of patients with ALS have fasciculations.

Although fasciculation potentials are extremely common in ALS, they also occur in other lower motor neuron disorders (radiculopathies and peripheral polyneuropathies), with the use of anticholinesterase medication, in hyperthyroidism and hypocalcemia, and in healthy muscles (particularly the calves). Thus, fasciculation potentials are nonspecific and may be benign, unless they are accompanied by fibrillation potentials or by MUAP changes.

Because they can occur in healthy individuals, an attempt has been made to distinguish “benign” from “malignant” fasciculations. On average, malignant fasciculations have a slower rate of discharge and higher amplitudes compared with the benign ones. However, these differences are not sufficient to provide a reliable method of distinguishing between them. The best way to differentiate is to look for accompanying changes on needle EMG, such as fibrillation potentials, impaired recruitment, and MUAP configuration abnormalities.

Fibrillation potentials are spontaneous action potentials of denervated muscle fibers that usually fire regularly. They can take one of two forms: a brief spike or a long-duration positive wave. They are seen most commonly in processes associated with axonal or neuronal loss, although they may occur in necrotizing myopathies. In ALS, the identification of fibrillation potentials is extremely important because they confirm the occurrence of axonal loss and support the suspicion that the accompanied fasciculation potentials are pathologic. Because fibrillation potentials are abolished by sprouting, which usually is an active process early in the disease course, these potentials can be of limited number and of scattered distribution during the first stages of ALS. In general, fibrillation potentials are more prominent in rapidly progressive than in slowly progressive motor neuron disease.

Reduced MUAP recruitment is caused by degeneration and loss of motor neurons in ALS, with the result that only a few can be activated voluntarily. The activated motor units fire more rapidly as anterior horn cells are lost (Figure C19-2). This EDX finding always is abnormal but, when isolated, does not mean automatically that axonal loss has occurred because it may happen if there is demyelination anywhere along the motor axon that results in the block of conduction transmission. In ALS patients, slow recruitment frequency (poor activation) of MUAPs in limbs where UMN loss predominates may also be evident but is a less frequent finding.

Reinnervated MUAPs dominate as collateral sprouting increases the number of muscle fibers per motor unit resulting in increased duration and amplitude MUAPs (Figure C19-2). Also, because of conduction slowing along the newly formed collateral sprouts, muscle fiber action potentials become asynchronous. This results in increased polyphasic MUAPs (more than four phases). Thus, a mixture of MUAPs often is seen on needle EMG, dependent on the stage of illness. Normal MUAPs are intermixed with polyphasic MUAPs, with or without satellite potentials (Figure C19-3), and with long-duration, high-amplitude MUAPs (Figure C19-4). Moment-to-moment MUAP amplitude variation, representing motor unit instability, may also be appreciated.

image

Figure C19-3 Polyphasic motor unit potential (MUAP) with satellite (linked) potentials, also called complex MUAP.

(From Daube J. AAEM minimonograph 11: needle electromyography in clinical electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:685–700, with permission.)

image

Figure C19-4 Relative average durations and amplitudes of some motor unit potentials (MUAPs) seen in myopathic and neurogenic disorders.

(From Daube J. AAEM minimonograph 11: needle electromyography in clinical electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:685–700, with permission.)

In summary, the findings on needle EMG are variable and depend on the stage of illness. At any one point in a patient’s illness, sampling many muscles in four limbs and the head often reveals a mixture of the following findings (listed in worsening severity):

Electrodiagnostic Criteria

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a clinical disorder in which the EDX study plays a major role in supporting the diagnosis and in excluding entities that can mimic ALS. Electrophysiologic confirmation of ALS requires evidence of a widespread LMN degeneration, and hence the needle EMG examination should be performed on three or more regions of the neuraxis and should assess all the major segments in the limbs examined. When the bulbar region is assessed, changes must be observed in at least one muscle (including tongue, jaw muscles, and facial muscles). Needle EMG of the tongue is difficult due to failure to achieve adequate relaxation which results in inability to appreciate fibrillation or fasciculation potentials. Also, the tongue MUAPs normally are small and may appear similar to fibrillation potentials. The thoracic segment can only be assessed by needle EMG of the thoracic paraspinal muscles at or below the T6 level, and occasionally the abdominal muscles. Evaluation of higher thoracic segments may be misleading as denervation changes derived from lower cervical segments may manifest as far caudally as the T6 level.

The criteria proposed by Lambert in 1969 had been the most widely accepted for the diagnosis of ALS. These criteria require fibrillation with fasciculation potentials in three limbs, with the head counting as a “limb.” El Escorial criteria have adopted these standards with some revisions. Table C19-4 provides a summary of definitive EDX criteria for ALS.

Table C19-4 Electrodiagnostic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

* Regions are defined as follows: brain stem (bulbar), cervical (upper limbs), thoracic (back and abdomen), and lumbosacral (lower limbs). Involvement in a region is without regard to right or left side, but location is indicative of the level of neuraxis involved.

Motor conduction velocities may be slowed but should not be lower than 70 to 80% of lower limits of normal values, in nerves with very low CMAP amplitudes (less than 50% of the lower limits of normal or less than 30% of normal mean).

The aforementioned criteria are fulfilled at the time of diagnosis in approximately two-thirds of patients with ALS. However, a significant proportion of patients with a clinical diagnosis of ALS fail to show these findings on EDX testing, particularly on initial studies. This is caused by the following limitations:

Thus, clinicians must understand the drawbacks of EDX study and use this test as an adjunct to clinical examination. Sequential EDX examinations are sometimes necessary to confirm progression and worsening of denervation in the affected limb(s), and even more importantly, to document evidence of dissemination of denervation. In practical terms, it frequently is more important for the electromyographer to test extensively an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic limb than a limb with severe atrophy and weakness because the documentation of denervational changes in all limbs is essential to show dissemination of disease and to solidify the diagnosis.

Although the role of EDX study in ALS is complementary to the clinical suspicion, there are many advantages associated with use of the EDX examination that:

SUGGESTED READINGS

Behina M, Kelly J. Role of electromyography in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve. 1991;14:1236-1241.

Bensimon G, et al. A controlled trial of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:585-591.

Bernstein LP, Antel JP. Motor neuron disease: decremental responses to repetitive stimulation. Neurology. 1981;31:204-205.

Bradley WG, et al. Morphometric and biochemical studies of peripheral nerves in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1983;14:267-277.

Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, et al. El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2000;1:293-299.

Brown RH. Superoxide dismutase and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: new insights into mechanisms and treatments. Ann Neurol. 1996;39:145-146.

Brown RH, Swash M, Pasinelli P, editors. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 2nd edn., Informa Healthcare, 2006.

Chancellor AM, Warlow CP. Adult onset motor neuron disease: worldwide mortality, incidence and distribution since 1950. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych. 1992;55:1106-1115.

Drachman DB, Kuncl RW. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an unconventional autoimmune disease? Ann Neurol. 1989;26:269-274.

Gooch CL, Harati Y. Motor unit number estimation, ALS and clinical trials. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2000;1:71-82.

Gurney ME, et al. Benefit of vitamin E, Riluzole, and Gabapentin in a transgenic model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1996;39:147-157.

Hjorth RJ, Walsh JC, Willison RG. The distribution and frequency of spontaneous fasciculations in motor neuron disease. J Neurol Sci. 1973;18:469-474.

Killian JM, et al. Decremental motor responses to repetitive nerve stimulation in ALS. Muscle Nerve. 1994;17:747-754.

Kuncl RW, Cornblath DR, Griffin JW. Assessment of thoracic parapsinal muscles in the diagnosis of ALS. Muscle Nerve. 1988;11:484-492.

Lacomblez L, et al. Dose-ranging study of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet. 1996;347:1425-1431.

Lambert EH. Electromyography in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In: Kurland LT, Norris FH, editors. Motor neuron diseases. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1969.

Lambert EH, Mulder DW. Electromyographic studies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 1957;32:441-446.

Miller RG, Rosenberg JA, Gelinas DF, et al. Practice parameter: rhe care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (an evidence based review). Neurology. 1999;52:1311-1323.

Mitsumoto H, Chad D, Pioro EP, editors. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis, 1998.

Moss AH, et al. Home ventilation for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 1993;43:438-443.

Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice advisory on the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with riluzole: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 1997;49:657-659.

Rosenfeld J, Swash M. What’s in a name? Lumping or splitting ALS, PLS, PMA and the other motor neuron diseases. Neurology. 2006;66:6214-6254.

Roth G. The origin of fasciculation potentials. Ann Neurol. 1982;12:542-547.

Rothstein JD. Excitotoxic mechanisms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In: Seratrice G, Munsat T, editors. Pathogenesis and therapy of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, advances in neurology, vol. 68. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1995.

Rothstein JD, Martin LJ, Kuncl RK. Decreased glutamate transport by the brain and spinal cord in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1464-1468.

Shefner JM, Tyler HR, Krarup C. Abnormalities in the sensory action potential in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve. 1991;14:1242-1246.

Siddique T, et al. Linkage of a gene causing familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis to chromosome 21 and evidence of genetic-locus heterogeneity. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1381-1384.

Smith RG, et al. Serum antibodies to L-type calcium channels in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1721-1728.

Sorenson EJ, Stalker AP, Kurland LT, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1925 to 1998. Neurology. 2002;59:280-282.

Urban PP, Vogt T, Hopf HC. Corticobulbar tract involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain. 1998;121:1099-1108.