Case 17

Published on 03/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 3 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 1355 times

Case 17

EDX FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

Pertinent EDX findings include the following:

These findings are diagnostic of a neuromuscular junction defect of the postsynaptic type and are consistent with myasthenia gravis. Normal CMAP amplitude at rest and the absence of CMAP increment after brief exercise exclude a presynaptic defect, as is seen with LEMS or botulism. The absence of denervation on needle EMG excludes a lower motor neuron disease (as seen with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), which may be associated with a decremental response on slow repetitive stimulation.

DISCUSSION

Anatomy and Physiology

Neuromuscular Junction

The neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is the site where the motor neuron makes contact with the skeletal muscle fiber’s membrane (sarcolemma). It is near the center of the muscle fiber where there is a cup-shaped depression of the sarcolemma, called the endplate. The NMJ is a chemical synapse that is essential for transmitting action potentials from the terminal nerve branches to muscle fibers. This synapse utilizes acetylcholine (ACH) as a transmitter that binds to specific receptors in the junctional membrane, resulting local depolarizations that spread and trigger all-or-none muscle action potential. The NMJ is divided into a presynaptic terminal, a synaptic cleft, and a postsynaptic region (Figure C17-3).

image

Figure C17-4 The acetylcholine receptor. Each subunit winds through the junctional membrane four times (M1 through M4).

(From Drachman DB. Myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1797–1810, with permission.)

Neuromuscular Transmission

Neuromuscular transmission involves the transmission of action potential from the motor neuron’s axon to the muscle fiber. The delay between the depolarization of the presynaptic terminal and the generation of endplate potential at the postsynaptic membrane is short (0.3–1 ms), and is mostly due to the exocytotic release of ACH from the presynaptic terminal. Neuromuscular transmission may be divided into three processes: (1) presynaptic terminal depolarization and ACH release; (2) ACH binding and ion channel opening; and (3) postsynaptic membrane depolarization and muscle action potential generation.

image

Figure C17-5 Neuromuscular transmission.

(From McComas AJ. Neuromuscular function and disorders. Boston, MA: Butterworth, 1977, with permission.)

Clinical Features

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the best understood and most thoroughly studied of all human organ-specific autoimmune diseases. It is characterized by a reduction of skeletal muscle postsynaptic ACH receptors resulting in a decrease in the EPP necessary for action potential generation. In the majority of patients, MG is caused by an antibody-mediated attack on the postsynaptic nicotinic ACH receptors in the neuromuscular junction. In a small number of patients, other antigenic targets, such as the muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK), may exist. Myoid cells and other stem cells within the thymus gland, which is hyperplastic in at least two-thirds of patients with MG, may serve as autoantigens by expressing on their surface the ACH receptor or one of its protein components.

The prevalence of MG is between 50 and 125 cases per million population. There is strong evidence that its prevalence is increasing, which may be in part attributed to better case recognition and aging of the population. As with many other autoimmune disorders, the disease afflicts mostly women, affected nearly twice as often as men. The annual incidence of MG ranges between 1.1 and 6 per million. MG incidence has two distinct peaks: the first occurs in the second and third decades and affects mostly women; and the second peak strikes mostly men during the sixth and seventh decades.

The hallmarks of MG are muscle weakness and fatigability. The symptoms are intermittent and are usually worse with activity and improve after rest. Generally, patients are much better in the morning than in the evening. Ocular symptoms (diplopia and/or ptosis) are extremely common and are the presenting signs in more than one half of patients. Most importantly, almost all patients at some point during the course of their illness develop ocular manifestations. Also, the disorder continues to be restricted to the extraocular muscles in 15% of patients, hence the designation ocular myasthenia. Additionally, only 3–10% of patients with ocular myasthenia generalize if no other symptoms appear after three years from initial presentation. Bulbar muscle weakness is the initial presenting manifestation in about 20% of patients and is seen in over 30% of patients during the course of their disease. Bulbar weakness is a major contributor to disability throughout the course of the disease. It manifests as dysarthria, nasal speech, dysphagia, chewing difficulties, or nasal regurgitation. Occasionally, the jaw muscle weakness may be severe leading to a “jaw drop” and patients often hold their jaw closed, a highly pathognomonic manifestation of MG. Limb weakness, mostly of proximal muscles, is seen as the initial symptom in 20% of patients. At times, the generalized weakness is severe and involves the respiratory muscles, resulting in respiratory failure that requires mechanical ventilation, a situation often referred to as myasthenic crisis. Because of variable clinical severity, MG is usually classified into five main categories (Table C17-1).

Table C17-1 Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Clinical Classification

Class I Any ocular muscle weakness
May have weakness of eye closure
All other muscle strength is normal
Class II Mild weakness affecting other than ocular muscles
May also have ocular muscle weakness of any severity
   IIa Predominantly affecting limb, axial muscles or both
May also have lesser involvement of oropharyngeal muscles
   IIb Predominantly affecting oropharyngeal, respiratory muscles, or both
May also have lesser involvement of limb, axial muscles, or both
Class III Moderate weakness affecting other than ocular muscles
May also have ocular muscle weakness of any severity
   IIIa Predominantly affecting limb, axial muscles or both
May also have lesser involvement of oropharyngeal muscles
   IIIb Predominantly affecting oropharyngeal, respiratory muscles, or both
May also have lesser involvement of limb, axial muscles, or both
Class IV Severe weakness affecting other than ocular muscles May also have ocular muscle weakness of any severity
   IVa Predominantly affecting limb, axial muscles or both May also have lesser involvement of oropharyngeal muscles
   IVb Predominantly affecting oropharyngeal, respiratory muscles, or both
May also have lesser involvement of limb, axial muscles, or both
Class V Defined by intubation, with or without mechanical ventilation, except when employed during routine postoperative management. The use of a feeding tube without intubation places the patient in class IVb

The findings on neurologic examination parallel the symptoms, often revealing ptosis, weakness of extraocular muscles, flaccid dysarthria, or neck extensor or proximal muscle weakness. Although many muscles are fatigable, the most objective finding is fatigable eyelids, i.e., ptosis developing within 1–2 minutes of sustained upgaze. Deep tendon reflexes are preserved. Sensation is normal.

The diagnosis of MG may be made on clinical grounds, especially when reproducible fatigability of eyelids or extraocular muscles is confirmed. However, laboratory testing is frequently needed, and recommended, for confirmation (Table C17-2):

Table C17-2 Confirmatory Diagnostic Tests in Myasthenia Gravis

The differential diagnosis of generalized MG includes Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), botulism, congenital myasthenic syndromes, and chronic fatigue syndrome. LEMS presents with generalized weakness, areflexia, and autonomic symptoms, but it is not uncommon to confuse its EDX findings with those of MG (Table C17-3). Botulism is subacute and has usually prominent autonomic manifestations, including dilated pupils and ileus. Congenital myasthenic syndromes are extremely rare disorders and usually begin in childhood. The fatigue associated with chronic fatigue syndrome may mimic generalized MG, except for normal ocular and bulbar strength and normal serologic and EDX studies. Ocular myasthenia should be distinguished from Graves disease (thyroid orbitopathy), progressive external ophthalmoplegia, Kearns-Sayre syndrome, oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy, congenital myasthenic syndromes, and orbital apex or cavernous sinus mass compressing cranial nerves. In Graves disease, there is proptosis, conjunctival edema, and muscle enlargement (on imaging of the orbit); the forced duction test is positive. Progressive external ophthalmoplegia and Kearns-Sayre syndrome have usually symmetrical and slowly progressive ophthalmoplegia and ptosis. In Kearns-Sayre syndrome, there is associated multisystem involvement including pigmentary retinopathy, cerebellar ataxia, and cardiac conduction defects. Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy is a late onset autosomal dominant disease with slowly progressive dysphagia and ophthalmoplegia. In compressive mass lesions, the extraocular weakness usually follows one or more oculomotor nerve distribution and the pupils are frequently involved. Imaging studies, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), might be required to rule out such a mass lesion within the orbit or cavernous sinus.

Table C17-3 Differential Diagnosis Between Generalized Myasthenia Gravis and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome

  Myasthenia Gravis Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome
Ocular involvement Common and prominent Uncommon and subtle
Bulbar involvement Common and prominent Uncommon and subtle
Myotatic reflexes Normal Absent or depressed
Sensory symptoms None Paresthesias are common
Autonomic involvement None Dry mouth, impotence and gastroparesis
Tensilon test Frequently positive May be positive
Serum antibodies directed against Postsynaptic Ach receptors or MuSK Presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels
Baseline CMAPs Normal Low in amplitude
Postexercise CMAPs No change Significant facilitation
Slow repetitive stimulation Decrement Decrement
Rapid repetitive stimulation No change or decrement Increment
Single-fiber EMG Increased jitter with blocking Increased jitter with blocking
Rapid-rate stimulation jitter Does not change or worsens jitter Improves jitter

CMAPs = compound muscle action potentials; EMG = electromyography, Ach = acetylcholine, MuSK = muscle-specific kinase.

Once the diagnosis of MG is confirmed, certain commonly associated disorders must be considered and excluded. Thymoma occurs in approximately 10% of all patients with MG. This is age specific and is most common in adult patients between the ages of 20 and 60 years. Elevated antistriated muscle antibodies, which occur in certain myasthenics, are useful markers for thymoma, particularly in patients between the ages of 20 and 50 years, while false positive and negative tests are common in the young (<20 years) and older (>60 years) MG patients. Thus, a computed tomography (CT) scan or an MRI of the chest should be performed on all patients with MG. Because hyperthyroidism occurs in 3 to 8% of patients with MG, all patients should have thyroid function tests at the time of diagnosis. Other autoimmune disorders, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, may coexist with myasthenia; screening for these should be performed by obtaining at least antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor.

Therapy for MG has improved dramatically over the past 30 years, and the current mortality from this disorder is near zero. Treatment consists of one or more of several modalities, often used separately or in combination (Table C17-4). Treatment choices are usually individualized to the patient depending on severity of illness, age, life style and career, associated complicating disorders, and the risk and benefit of various therapies.

Table C17-4 Therapeutic Modalities in Myasthenia Gravis

Therapy Mechanism of Action
Cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., pyridostigmine) Enhances neuromuscular transmission
Corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, etc. Immunosuppression
Plasmapheresis Removes antibodies from circulation
Intravenous immunoglobulins Unknown (?downregulates antibody production)
Thymectomy Unknown (?eliminates a source of antigenic stimulation [thymic myoid cells] and/or removes a reservoir of B lymphocytes)

Electrodiagnosis

Electrodiagnostic (EDX) abnormalities encountered in MG are related to the blockade of the NMJ at the postsynaptic membrane. Although the changes are observed most often with repetitive stimulation of motor nerves or single-fiber EMG, other less specific changes may be encountered on routine EMG examination.

Nerve Conduction Studies

Sensory conduction studies are normal in MG. Similarly, routine motor conduction studies are usually normal. However, on rare occasions, the CMAP amplitudes are borderline or slightly decreased. This occurs in patients with prominent weakness, such as that associated with a myasthenic crisis, and is explained by prominent neuromuscular blockade beyond the safety factor (see repetitive nerve stimulation). In these situations, many muscle fibers do not reach threshold with a single stimulus, as is used with routine motor conduction studies, resulting in a small summated CMAP. It should be noted again that this is an extremely rare finding in MG. In fact, a presynaptic disorder, such as LEMS and botulism, should always be considered and excluded when the CMAP amplitudes are low or borderline. A presynaptic disorder is confirmed by looking for a significant (>50–100%) increment of CMAP amplitude after brief exercise and/or rapid, repetitive stimulation (see repetitive stimulation). Compound muscle action potential increment after brief exercise and/or rapid, repetitive nerve stimulation is not a feature of MG.

Needle EMG Examination

Needle EMG results usually are normal in MG. Three changes may, however, be seen. These include:

1. Unstable MUAPs (moment-to-moment variation of MUAPs). In healthy subjects, individual MUAPs are morphologically stable between successive discharges with no variation in amplitude and configuration, since all muscle fibers of the motor unit fire with every discharge. The morphology of a repetitively firing MUAP may fluctuate in patients with MG, if individual muscle fibers intermittently block within the unit (Figure C17-6). Technically, MUAP variation is best achieved during recording of a single MUAP by minimal voluntary activation. Care should be taken to record from no more than a single MUAP because MUAP overlap can lead to an erroneous assumption of MUAP instability. This finding is, however, not specific because it is observed in other neuromuscular junction disorders as well as in neurogenic disorders associated with active reinnervation such as motor neuron disease, subacute radiculopathy, or polyneuropathy. During reinnervation, the newly formed endplates are immature and demonstrate poor efficacy of neuromuscular transmission.

Repetitive Nerve Stimulation (RNS)

Basic Concepts

To comprehend the effects of repetitive stimulation of motor nerves in both healthy individuals and those with myasthenic conditions, one must review important facts regarding the transmission of action potential through the presynaptic terminal and the postsynaptic membrane. These physiologic facts dictate the type and frequency of repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) and the type of single fiber EMG study utilized in the accurate diagnosis of NMJ disorders.

Electrophysiology

When repetitive stimulation is applied to a normal motor nerve, the amount of ACH released during the first several stimulations exceeds what is released during ensuing stimulations. Despite this decrease, the amount of ACH released continues to exceed the ACH required to reach action potential threshold because of the safety factor. The decline in ACH release also levels off to a constant amount because of mobilization of large amount of ACH from depot stores into the active zone. This allows indefinite release of ACH during prolonged stimulation at physiologic rates.

The rate at which motor nerves are stimulated dictates whether calcium plays a role in enhancing the release of ACH. Because Ca2+ diffuses out of the presynaptic terminal within 100 to 200 ms, a slow rate of stimulation (slower than every 200 ms) implies that the subsequent stimulus arrives long after calcium has dispersed. Thus, an interstimulus interval of greater than 200 ms, or a stimulation rate of less than 5 Hz, is considered a slow rate of repetitive stimulation. At this slow rate, the role of Ca2+ in ACH release is not enhanced. In contrast, with rapid repetitive stimulation (i.e., at an interstimulus interval of less than 200 ms, or a stimulation rate greater than 5–10 Hz), Ca2+ influx is enhanced greatly, which results in larger releases of ACH and a larger EPP.

In normal conditions (Figures C17-7 and C17-8), both rates of stimulation generate MFAPs in all muscle fibers since the EPPs remain above threshold because of the safety factor. Thus, at both stimulation rates, all muscle fibers generate MFAPs, and the CMAP (summated MFAPs) does not change (i.e., no decrement or increment).

However, the postsynaptic disorders, such as MG, are characterized by the following (Tables C17-3 and C17-5):

In contrast, the presynaptic disorders, such as Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, are characterized by the following (See Tables C17-3 and C17-5):

Technical Considerations

Repetitive nerve stimulation often follows routine motor NCS. Electromyographers and nerve conduction technologists should master the various motor NCS and RNS techniques to avoid false positive and false negative results. There are certain prerequisites that are essential for performing reliable RNS and for increasing the sensitivity and specificity of the test in the diagnosis of RNS.

Single-Fiber EMG

Technical Considerations

Recording of neuromuscular jitter requires specific requisites that are essential for the completion and accurate interpretation of data. These include the following:

Voluntary Single-Fiber EMG

Voluntary (recruitment) SFEMG is the most commonly used method for activating motor units: the patient activates and maintains the firing rate of the motor unit. This technique is not possible if the patient cannot cooperate (e.g., child, dementia, coma, or severe weakness), and is difficult if the patient is unable to maintain a constant firing rate (e.g., tremor, dystonia, or spasticity). With minimal voluntary activation, the needle is positioned until at least two muscle potentials (a pair) from a single motor unit are recognized. When a muscle fiber pair is identified, one fiber triggers the oscilloscope (triggering potential), and the second precedes or follows the first (slave potential). Normal values for jitter (mean and individual values) are available from a multicenter international collaborative effort (Table C17-6). Jitter values differ between muscles, and tend to increase with age, particularly over the age of 50 years.

The muscle(s) tested should be customized according to the patient’s symptoms. Frequently tested muscles in patients with suspected MG are the extensor digitorum communis, the orbicularis oculi, and the frontalis. The latter two are particularly helpful in the diagnosis of ocular myasthenia. They are ideal because most patients can control and sustain their voluntary activity to the minimum required for the test. The diagnostic yield of jitter study is increased by the examination of affected muscle(s) performed by an experienced electromyographer on a fully cooperative patient.

With voluntary activation, 50 to 100 consecutive discharges of a single pair are recorded. After the interpotential intervals (IPIs) of the pairs are measured, a mean consecutive difference (MCD or jitter) is calculated as follows:

image

where MCD is mean consecutive difference, IPI is interpotential interval, and N is the number of discharges (intervals) recorded. In practice, an MCD should be calculated from at least 50 interpotential intervals. Analysis of 10 to 20 pairs frequently is needed for a mean MCD to be reported. Although the jitter can be measured using a mean and a standard deviation, it is measured more reliably by the MCD because of the potential change in the mean IPI over time. Jitter is best expressed as the mean MCD of approximately 10 to 20 muscle fiber pairs (Figure C17-9).

Neuromuscular blocking is defined as the failure of transmission of one of the potentials. Blocking represents the most extreme abnormality of the jitter. Blocking is calculated as the percentage of discharges of a motor unit in which a single-fiber potential does not fire. For example, during 100 discharges of the pair, if a single potential is missing 30 times, the blocking occurs at a rate of 30%. In general, blocking occurs when jitter values are significantly abnormal.

In patients with MG, abnormal jitter values are common and frequently are accompanied by blocking (Figure C17-10). This reflects the failure of one of the muscle fiber pairs to transmit an action potential because of the failure of the EPP to reach threshold. The results of SFEMG jitter study are expressed by: (1) the mean jitter of all potential pairs, (2) the percentage of pairs with blocking, and (3) the percentage of pairs with normal jitter.

Jitter analysis is highly sensitive, but it is not specific. It is frequently abnormal in MG and other neuromuscular junction disorders; however, it also may be abnormal in a variety of neuromuscular disorders, including neuropathy, myopathy, and anterior horn cell disorder. Thus, a diagnosis of MG obtained by jitter analysis must be considered in the context of the patient’s clinical manifestations, nerve conduction studies, and needle EMG findings.

Stimulation Single-Fiber EMG

Stimulation (axonal-stimulated) SFEMG records the jitter between a stimulus artifact and a single potential that is generated by stimulation of a motor unit near the endplate zone. It has the advantage of requiring no patient participation; thus, it may be performed on children, as well as uncooperative or comatose patients. It is performed by inserting another monopolar needle electrode near the intramuscular nerve twigs, and stimulating at a low current and constant rate. The electromyographer has to manipulate two electrodes, a stimulating and recording electrode, until one or more potentials are recorded. The IPI is calculated between the stimulus artifact and a single potential generated by stimulating a motor unit near the endplate zone. Since jitter (MCD) values are calculated on the basis of one endplate, the normal values are lower than those obtained by voluntary activation. To calculate the normal stimulation jitter value, the reference data for voluntary activation are multiplied by 0.80.

In addition to its relative ease in performing, the rate of stimulation can be adjusted from a slow rate (2–5 Hz) to a rapid rate (20–50 Hz). This is helpful in the differentiation of presynaptic and postsynaptic disorders because neuromuscular transmission, jitter and blocking improve significantly with a rapid rate stimulation in LEMS, but it does not change or it worsens in MG (Figure C17-11).

SUGGESTED READINGS

Barberi S, Weiss GM, Daube JR. Fibrillation potentials in myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 1982;5:S50.

Boonyapisit K, Kaminski HJ, Ruff RL. The molecular basis of neuromuscular transmission disorders. Am J Med. 1999;6:97-113.

Daroff RB. The office Tensilon test for ocular myasthenia gravis. Arch Neurol. 1986;43:843-844.

Drachman DB. Myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1797-1810.

Gilchrist JM. Ad hoc committee of the AAEM special interest group on SFEMG. Single fiber EMG reference values: a collaborative effort. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15:151-161.

Gilchrist JM. Single fiber EMG. In: Katirji B, Kaminski HJ, Preston DC, Ruff RL, Shapiro EB, editors. Neuromuscular disorders in clinical practice. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2002:141-150.

Howard JH, Sanders DB, Massey JM. The electrodiagnosis of myasthenia gravis and the Lambert-Eaton syndrome. Neurol Clin. 1994;12:305-330.

Kaminski HJ, editor. Myasthenia gravis and related disorders. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2003.

Katirji B, Kaminski HJ. An electrodiagnostic approach to the patient with neuromuscular junction disorder. Neuro Clin. 2002;20:557-586.

Kelly JJ, et al. The laboratory diagnosis of mild myasthenia gravis. Ann Neurol. 1982;12:238-242.

Kupersmith MJ, Moster M, Bhuiyan S, et al. Beneficial effects of corticosteroids on ocular myasthenia gravis. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:802-804.

Lanska DJ. Diagnosis of thymoma in myasthenic using anti-striated muscle antibodies. Neurology. 1991;41:520-524.

Lewis RA, Selwa JF, Lisak RP. Myasthenia gravis: immunological mechanisms and immunotherapy. Ann Neurol. 1995;37(S1):S51-S62.

Oh SJ. Electromyography: neuromuscular transmission studies. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1988.

Oh SJ, et al. Electrophysiological and clinical correlation in myasthenia gravis. Ann Neurol. 1982;12:348-354.

Oh SH, et al. Diagnostic sensitivity of the laboratory tests in myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15:720-724.

Stalberg E, Trontelj JV. Single fiber electromyography, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Press, 1994.

Tindall RSA, et al. Preliminary results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of cyclosporine in myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:719-724.

Zinman L, Ng E, Bril V. IV immunoglobulin in patients with myasthenia gravis: A randomized controlled study. Neurology. 2007;68:837-841.