Case 1

Published on 03/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 1 (6 votes)

This article have been viewed 1401 times

Case 1

EDX FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

The pertinent electrodiagnostic EDX features in this case include the following:

These findings imply that the predominant pathologic process is segmental demyelination (conduction block with normal distal peroneal CMAPs and SNAP), with minimal axonal loss (fibrillation potentials). The prognosis for recovery is excellent because it is dependent primarily on remyelination.

DISCUSSION

The anatomy and clinical and electrodiagnostic (EDX) presentations of peroneal mononeuropathy are discussed in detail, along with an accompanying case of peroneal nerve lesion (Case 8). The discussions here are limited to peripheral nerve injury and the electrodiagnostic findings of such injury.

Pathology of Peripheral Nerve Injury

Transient neurologic symptoms related to minor peripheral nerve compression are extremely common and are rapidly reversible. They probably result from action potential propagation failure caused by ischemia. They are not associated with structural alteration of the axon, myelin, or supporting structure. In contrast, prolonged or severe compression, traction, laceration, thermal, or chemical injury may damage the myelin, axon, or the supporting components of the peripheral nerves and results in significant disability from which the patient may not recover completely.

Nerve injuries that are associated with focal interruption of the continuity of the axons cause significant changes in the structure of the peripheral nerve distal to the lesion (Table C1-1). The distal axons undergo a degenerative process, known as wallerian degeneration. This occurs since all the necessary building blocks needed for maintaining the axon are made in the cell body (peikaryon) and cannot reach the distal stump. The rate at which wallerian degeneration proceeds varies depending on the nerve injured, axon diameter, and the length of distal stump (the larger and the longer the distal stump the more time is needed for wallerian degeneration to be completed). Within hours of most nerve injuries, myelin begins to retract from the axons at the nodes of Ranvier. This is followed by swelling of the distal nerve segment, leakage of axoplasm, and subsequently the disappearance of neurofibrils. Within days, the axon and myelin fragment, and digestion of nerve components starts. By the end of the first week, the axon and myelin become fully digested and Schwann cells start to bridge the gap between the two nerve segments. In chronic nerve lesions, the endoneurial tubes in the distal stump shrink, the nerve fascicles atrophy distal to the lesion, and, in complete nerve transection, the severed ends retract away from each other.

Table C1-1 Consequences of Focal Axonal Injury Distal to the Lesion

In contrast to the severe changes that occur distal to the lesion, only minor changes occur proximally. Though most of the proximal stump survives and maintains its ability to regenerate, there is often a slight retrograde degeneration of axons, up to several centimeters from the site of injury depending on the severity of the lesion. Also, the neuron cell body reacts to the axonal injury, by revealing an eccentric nucleus and marginally placed rough endoplasmic reticulum (Nissl’s substance). These changes are worse with proximal than with distal nerve lesions.

Classification of Peripheral Nerve Injury

Many classifications of peripheral nerve injury have been suggested, but Seddon’s and Sunderland’s classifications are the most widely used in clinical practice. These are based on the functional status of the nerve and on histologic findings. They are shown in Table C1-2 and in Figure C1-2, with their corresponding electrophysiologic findings.

Diagnosis of Peripheral Nerve Injury

Injuries to peripheral nerves are highest in prevalence in young adults between the ages of 18 and 35 years and result in substantial degree of disability. They are often accompanied by other bodily injuries including fractures, dislocations, or soft tissue damage. When associated with head or spine injury, peripheral nerve lesions may be overlooked until late during the rehabilitative phase of treatment. Traumatic nerve injuries may be direct (such as with a stab wound to the sciatic nerve) or indirect (such as with radial neuropathy following humeral fracture). These lesions are much more common during wartime, but they also accompany civilian trauma that results from vehicular accidents, industrial accidents, gunshots, or knife wounds. Also, a significant percentage of peripheral nerve injuries encountered in clinical practice are iatrogenic, occurring in the setting of surgical or radiological procedures, or following needle insertion or medical therapy such as with the use of anticoagulation.

The diagnosis of peripheral nerve injury often requires a detailed history and neurologic examination, with the EDX studies and surgical findings playing important roles in diagnosis and management. The history and physical examination are extremely important in predicting the location, type, and severity of the nerve lesion. For example, a stab wound injury to a nerve is often associated with axonal interruptions and grade three to five nerve injuries, while intraoperative nerve compression distant from the site of surgical field is usually a grade one (neurapraxic and demyelinating) or two (axonal) nerve injury.

Electrodiagnosis of Peripheral Nerve Injury

The EDX studies are the cornerstone in the diagnosis and management of nerve injuries by providing valuable information as to the location of the lesion, and its severity, pathophysiology, and prognosis (Table C1-3). Intraoperatively, the EDX studies guide the surgeon during the procedure and help assess the status of the regenerating axons within the injured nerve segment. During the recovery stage of peripheral nerve injury that may occur spontaneously or after surgical repair, the EDX studies are also essential in the evaluation of remyelination, regeneration, and reinnervation.

Table C1-3 Role of Electrodiagnostic Studies in Peripheral Nerve Injury

In contrast to the anatomical classification of nerve injuries, the pathophysiologic responses to peripheral nerve injuries have a limited repertoire: that is, axon loss, demyelination, or a combination of both. The EDX studies evaluate the integrity of the myelin sheath and the axon exclusively, and can only distinguish a neurapraxic injury (myelin injury) from all other degrees of injury that are associated with axonal damage and wallerian degeneration.

Localization of Nerve Lesions Using Nerve Conduction Studies

There are essentially three electrophysiologic consequences to peripheral nerve injury that can be assessed by nerve conduction studies. Two of them, namely focal slowing of conduction and conduction block, are caused by myelin disruption; the third is a manifestation of axonal loss (conduction failure).

Focal Slowing

Focal slowing in peripheral nerve injuries represents a convenient method of localizing lesions. When focal slowing is an isolated finding such as of the ulnar nerve across the elbow, the patient is not symptomatic and has no weakness or sensory loss. In symptomatic peripheral nerve injuries, focal slowing is associated with conduction block due to internodal demyelination, axon loss, or both.

Focal slowing of conduction usually is caused by widening of the nodes of Ranvier (paranodal demyelination) and, sometimes, focal axonal narrowing. It is evident on NCSs by slowing of conduction of a specific nerve segment, while other segments of the same nerve as well as neighboring nerves remain normal. When the large myelinated fibers are slowed to essentially the same extent, focal slowing across the involved nerve segment is synchronized. This is manifested by either a prolongation of distal latencies (in distal lesions) or slowing in conduction velocities (in proximal lesions), while the CMAP amplitude, duration, and area are not affected and do not change when the nerve is stimulated proximal to the lesion. When variable number of the medium or small nerve fibers (average or slower conducting axons) are affected only, desynchronized (differential) slowing of conduction across the nerve segment is evident. In this situation, the CMAP is dispersed on stimulation proximal to the lesion and has prolonged duration, with normal (nondispersed) response on distal stimulation. If this finding is isolated, the distal latency or conduction velocity, which represent the speed of the largest (fastest) axons, are normal. However, in most clinical situations, the large fibers are often involved also, desynchronized slowing is usually accompanied by slowing at the involved segment, resulting in concomitant slowing of distal latency or conduction velocity.

Conduction Block

Normally, the action potential is generated by sufficient temporal and spatial summation of excitatory inputs to motor or sensory axons. The nerve potential travels a myelinated axon in a saltatory fashion, passing hundreds of nodes of Ranvier without failure. The axonal regions at the site of the nodes of Ranvier are rich in Na channels. An abrupt change in Na conductance forms the basis for the generation of nerve action potential and the maintenance of saltatory conduction. Loss of myelin can involve one or more segments of these axons (segmental demyelination). Segmental demyelination can result from in widening of the nodes (paranodal demyelination) or the loss of one or more internodal segments (internodal demyelination). Both forms of demyelination can result in slowing or block of conduction. However, at least in compressive/entrapment neuropathy, focal slowing of conduction is characteristic of paranodal demyelination, whereas conduction block is a manifestation of internodal demyelination.

Before one can understand the electrophysiologic diagnosis of conduction block, the normal conduction studies of nerves, especially in reference to temporal dispersion and phase cancellation, and, ultimately, conduction block, must be discussed.

Three physiologic facts play a pivotal role in the generation of the CMAP which is obtained with surface recording.

Because of this physiologic variability, the CMAP configuration changes according to the site of stimulation. Typically, as the stimulus site moves proximally, the CMAP increases in duration and decreases in amplitude and, to a lesser extent, area. With more proximal stimulation, action potentials generated by motor units of slowly conducting fibers are increasingly dispersed in time with respect to those from fast-conducting fibers. This results in positive/negative phase overlap and cancellation of some components of the motor unit waveforms, thus prolonging its duration and reducing the amplitude and area of the summated response (CMAP).

Temporal dispersion and phase cancellation are more prominent in sensory nerve conduction studies due to (1) the disparity of sensory fiber conduction velocities which are almost double that of the motor axons (25 m/s) and (2) the surface recorded nerve action potentials are triphasic. The SNAP may normally decrease in amplitude and area by 50+ or more and its duration can increase by 100+ or more with proximal stimulation in antidromic studies (or with proximal recording with orthodromic studies). Hence, it is a common practice not to rely on sensory studies in the diagnosis of conduction block. Figures C1-3 and C1-4 depict the concept of temporal dispersion and phase cancellation using computer modeling.

Impeding transmission of action potentials is the basis of conduction block. This usually results from internodal demyelination, but can occur in axonal loss before wallerian degeneration (“axonal” conduction block). Blockage of the transmission of electrical impulses anywhere throughout the course of motor axons results in motor weakness that is often indistinguishable from weakness that results from loss of motor neurons or motor axons. Experimental evidence on tourniquet paralysis on baboon hind limb showed that conduction block is reversible and the distal nerve remains normal and excitable (Figure C1-5).

image

Figure C1-5 Evoked compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from the abductor hallucis muscle of a baboon at different intervals after a tourniquet was inflated for 95 minutes to 1000 mmHg around the knee. S1, S2, and S3 are the sites of stimulation, as is shown in the schematic (bottom).

(Reprinted with permission from Fowler CJ, Danta G, Gilliatt RW. Recovery of nerve conduction after a pneumatic tourniquet: observation on the hind-limb of the baboon. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1972;35: 638–647. © BMJ Publishing Group.)

In practice, conduction block is defined as a relative decrease in the CMAP amplitude and area with proximal stimulation, when compared with the CMAP on distal stimulation, without significant prolongation of CMAP duration. Conduction block should be distinguished from physiologic or abnormal temporal dispersion. Based on experimental studies, differential slowing along medium and thinly myelinated fibers may result in temporal dispersion and phase cancellation manifesting as significant drop of amplitude that may occasionally reach up to 80+. This is often associated with obvious and marked prolongation of CMAP duration. In contrast to amplitude decay, differential slowing does not drop the area beyond 50+. Hence, in true conduction block a significant drop in amplitude should always be corroborated by a similar drop in CMAP area.

There are no uniformly accepted criteria for the identification of conduction block. Table C1-4 reveals some of the common errors made in the EMG laboratory in the diagnosis of true conduction block. Table C1-5 lists practical criteria for the diagnosis of conduction block. In general, an amplitude change should be always supported by area change, since a significant drop in amplitude up to 50+ or more may occasionally be due solely to abnormal temporal dispersion while an area drop of more than 50+ is always due to conduction block. In clinical practice, the identification of demyelinative conduction block is an excellent tool for precisely localizing peripheral nerve lesions. Conduction block is often caused by acute nerve compression such as peroneal mononeuropathy at the fibular neck or radial mononeuropathy across the spiral groove. It is also a common finding in immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies such as acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, or multifocal motor neuropathy. Finally, conduction block usually is reversible and amenable to treatment, by removing the offending compression factor from the injured nerve or immunotherapy.

Table C1-4 Common Errors in the Diagnosis of Conduction Block

Table C1-5 Electrodiagnosis of Conduction Block*

CMAP = compound muscle action potential.

* All amplitudes, areas, and durations reflect negative-peak areas, amplitudes, and durations.

Caution should be used in evaluating the tibial nerve since stimulation at the knee may result in more than 50% decrease in amplitude, especially in obese patients.

Axonal Loss

In cases where there has been axonal damage following the completion of wallerian degeneration, the NCSs characteristically result in unelicitable or uniformly low CMAP amplitude, which is not dispersed, at all stimulation points. This pattern unfortunately cannot localize the site of injury to a specific segment of the nerve, and other measures need to be considered in localization such as the history, clinical examination, and needle EMG.

NCSs, done on patients who harbor axonal damage before the completion of wallerian degeneration, require special attention since they can be a source of error in localizing, characterizing, or prognosticating nerve lesions. However, these early studies are useful since they often help localizing lesions better than if NCSs are done after the completion of wallerian degeneration.

Early after axonal damage, the distal stump remains excitable for a variable period with some differences between the motor and sensory responses. The distal CMAP remains normal for 1 to 2 days after injury, giving rise to a pattern of conduction block on NCS that mimics the one seen with segmental demyelination. This pattern is sometimes referred to as “axonal noncontinuity, early axon loss, and axon discontinuity” conduction block. It is important to recognize this pattern since it carries poor prognosis, in contrast to the conduction block that is caused by segmental demyelination which usually recovers rapidly and completely. As wallerian degeneration progresses following axon injury, the distal CMAP then falls precipitously to reach its nadir by 5–6 days postinjury. After this time, the conduction block pattern is replaced by unelicitable CMAPs in complete lesions or low-amplitude CMAPs in partial lesions that are independent of the stimulation sites. In contrast to the motor studies, the distal sensory nerve remains excitable for a slightly longer period. The distal SNAP remains normal for 5–6 days and then decreases rapidly to reach its nadir in 10–11 days (Figure C1-6). Thus, repeat studies performed after the completion of wallerian degeneration prove that the lesion is due to axonal loss, by revealing a decrease in distal CMAP to values very similar to proximal CMAP values, along with low or absent SNAP.

Identification of motor conduction block in the early days of axonal loss is extremely helpful for localization, particularly in closed nerve injury, in which the exact site of trauma is not clear on clinical grounds. Thus, nerve conduction studies must be obtained if possible as soon as the patient seeks medical attention. Waiting for the completion of wallerian degeneration results in low CMAPs, regardless of stimulation sites, thus not allowing for any localization of the injury site.

Localization of Nerve Lesions Using Needle Electromyography

The earliest finding on needle EMG following a nerve injury is a complete loss of voluntary activity (with a complete lesion) or a decrease in MUAP recruitment (with a partial lesion) in weak muscles. This is the result of failure of nerve action potentials to reach the target muscle that follows nerve lesions associated with axon loss or segmental demyelination. Hence, a decrease MUAP recruitment per se cannot distinguish between axon loss and demyelinating lesions. Also, the degree of impaired MUAP recruitment correlates with the extent of clinical weakness, and is proportional to the number of lost or demyelinated axons.

Axon loss lesions studied by NCSs prior to wallerian degeneration, as well as demyelinating (neurapraxic) lesions, are often precisely localized to a short segment of the nerve due to the presence of conduction block across that segment. Hence, localization of lesions by needle EMG is most important in axon loss lesions that are first studied following the completion of wallerian degeneration of motor axons (more than 5–6 days postinjury). These lesions are associated with nonlocalizable NCSs that are characterized by low-amplitude or unelicitable CMAPs from all nerve simulation sites.

The concept of localization by needle EMG is similar to clinical localization using manual muscle strength testing which is part of the motor system evaluation during the neurologic examination. Muscles innervated by branches arising from the nerve distal to the lesion are often weak, while those innervated by branches proximal to the lesion are normal. Clinical localization of the site of the lesion is usually accurate in sharp penetrating injuries that are well defined such as nerve laceration. However, clinical localization may not be possible or inaccurate in patients with extensive bodily injury that may limit the neurological examination or involve several nerves or elements of a plexus.

Localization by needle EMG relies on electrophysiological changes that occur in denervated muscles, namely fibrillation potentials, reduced MUAP recruitment, and MUAP changes characteristic of reinnervation. It should be noted that fibrillation potentials appear after 1–2 weeks of acute denervation but do not become full until after 3 weeks after nerve injury. They disappear late in the course of denervation when muscle fibers become reinnervated or fibrotic and severely atrophied. Hence, fibrillation potentials may be absent in very acute or chronic denervation. Also, reinnervation MUAPs are first apparent after one month of injury in partial axonal lesions and become widespread with increasing time.

The concept of localization by needle EMG follows the same rules as the manual muscle examination, namely muscles innervated by branches arising from the nerve distal to the lesion are denervated, while those innervated by branches proximal to the lesion are normal. Unfortunately, several types of axon loss lesions may pose problems when attempting to localize the site of the injury solely by needle EMG.

Timing of Electrodiagnostic Studies in Peripheral Nerve Injury

The ideal timing of the initial EDX study in a patient with peripheral nerve injury depends on the clinical situation. Treating physicians should be aware of the EDX limitations and know that the electrophysiologic abnormalities that are critical to the accurate interpretation of the location and severity of the lesion progressively appear during the first 2–3 weeks postinjury.

In patients with closed nerve trauma or severe limb trauma at several sites, where the exact site of injury may not be clear, early NCSs are very useful in attempting to identify conduction block across the site of the lesion. This should be done, if possible, very early and before 3–5 days from injury since the distal CMAP reaches its nadir after that time. Detecting conduction block with this early study is extremely useful in precise localization of the site of the lesion, though finding a conduction block cannot distinguish whether the lesion is due to axon loss, demyelination, or a mixture of both. A repeat study after allowing time for the completion of motor and sensory wallerian degeneration (i.e., after 10–11 days from injury) helps establish the pathophysiologic diagnosis and estimate the degree of injury and prognosis.

When NCSs are repeated, one of three scenarios may arise: (1) the conduction block does not change, hence the lesion is purely demyelinating (neurapraxia), (2) the distal CMAP drops to equal the proximal CMAP, hence the lesion is axon loss (axonotmesis or neurotmesis), and (3) the CMAP amplitude drops distally but there is a remaining drop proximally (i.e., the distal CMAP is low but significantly higher that the proximal CMAP), hence the lesion is mixed with evidence of demyelination and axon loss.

In axon loss lesions, waiting to obtain NCSs until after the completion of wallerian degeneration (after 10–11 days from injury) results in diffusely low-amplitude or absent CMAPs and SNAPs from all stimulation sites, which does not allow for precise localization of the injury site. This is accepted in circumstances where the site of lesion is clear and the lesion is likely axon loss (e.g., stab wound). Not infrequently, the patient presents to the specialist after the time expected for completion of wallerian degeneration (after 10–11 days postinjury). In these situations, localization will depend on the needle EMG, and the optimal timing of the EDX study would be 3–5 weeks after injury when fibrillation potentials are fully developed in all denervated muscles and reinnervation is barely apparent.

Determining Severity of Nerve Injury by Electrodiagnostic Studies

An important role of the EDX studies is to estimate the degree of nerve injury since this has a direct effect on prognosis and long-term disability. In demyelinating conduction block lesions, one can approximate the number of demyelinated motor axons by comparing the distal to the proximal CMAPs. For example in a patient with common radial nerve lesion across the spiral groove, a 6 mV response from extensor digitorum communis obtained from distal stimulation at the elbow and a 3 mV response from proximal stimulation above the spiral groove implies that about 50+ of the axons are blocked (demyelinated) while the remaining 50+ conduct normally.

In axon loss lesions, the CMAP amplitude is the best estimate of the degree of motor axon loss. In contrast, fibrillation potentials are the most sensitive indicator of motor axonal loss, since a loss of a single axon results in up to 200 denervated muscle fibers (depending on the innervation ratio of the innervated muscle). SNAP amplitude reflects the degree of sensory axon loss, though it has less implication on disability than CMAP amplitude. The changes seen on EDX studies with increasing severity of axon loss follow a certain pattern that is predictable and applies to most mixed sensorimotor nerve lesions examined after 3 weeks from injury. With mild axon loss lesions, there are usually only fibrillation potentials in affected muscles with normal or slightly reduced MUAP recruitment, and normal CMAP and SNAP amplitudes. With moderate axon loss lesions, fibrillation potentials and decreased recruitment are coupled with a low-amplitude or absent SNAP while the CMAP usually remains normal or is borderline in amplitude. Following severe axon loss lesions, the SNAP is absent and the CMAP is either very low in amplitude or absent. This is accompanied by profuse fibrillation potentials and marked reduction in MUAP recruitment.

The sensitivity exhibited by the various EDX parameters of axon loss is inversely related to the time these abnormalities become apparent after an acute lesion. For example, fibrillation potentials are most sensitive to axon loss but do not fully develop until 3–5 weeks, while the CMAP amplitude is the least sensitive, since it only decreases after significant axon loss and as early as 2–5 days from injury). Hence, it is important to always perform needle EMG about 3–5 weeks postinjury on all patients with suspected acute peripheral nerve trauma to look for fibrillation potentials and assess for the presence of axon loss.

In axon loss lesions, estimating the extent of motor axonal loss, after the completion of wallerian degeneration (more than 10–11 days), requires comparison of the distal CMAP to the same CMAP in the contralateral limb. Optimally, motor and sensory NCSs should be done bilaterally and compared, though there is up to 30+ side-to-side variability in normal controls. Comparison to normal laboratory values may be necessary in bilateral lesions or when the contralateral limb cannot be studied (concomitant injury, amputation, etc.). In a complete nerve transection, there is absence of distal and proximal CMAPs. In a partial axonal lesion, the low distal CMAP amplitude reflects the number of axons lost. For example, in a patient with median nerve laceration in the forearm, a 2 mV response from abductor pollicis brevis obtained from distal stimulation at the wrist compared to a 10 mV response from the contralateral side implies that about 80+ of axons were lost.

In mixed lesions, an estimate of the percentage of axons that are demyelinated versus those that underwent wallerian degeneration requires a combination of calculations that assess the degree of conduction block and axon loss which should be only done after the time of wallerian degeneration is completed. For example, in a patient with peroneal nerve lesion at the fibular neck, if a 3 mV response was obtained from the tibialis anterior following distal stimulation below the fibular neck and a 1.5 mV response from proximal stimulation above the fibular neck, coupled with a 5 mV response from distal stimulation on the contralateral side, one can approximate that 40+ of the axons are lost while 30+ are blocked (demyelinated) and the remaining 30+ are intact.

Intraoperative Electrodiagnostic Studies

Intraoperative recording is pivotal in the surgical management of patients with severe nerve injuries. Surgery provides a unique opportunity for direct recordings of compound nerve action potentials (CNAPs) across the injured segment of the nerve. These studies are most helpful in nerve lesions associated with severe or total axonal injury that remains in continuity (second through fourth degree nerve injuries) since the clinical and routine EDX studies often cannot accurately classify the degree of nerve injury. In contrast, intraoperative studies are not useful in neurapraxia (first degree injury) since remyelination is expected and surgical intervention is rarely indicated, or in complete nerve transection (neurotmesis or fifth degree) since these studies will have no role in the choice of surgical intervention (reanastomosis or grafting).

The indication for surgical repair of a peripheral nerve lesion depends on the type and severity of the nerve lesion. With sharp nerve transection (such as with glass or knife injuries), primary (immediate) repair is often done at the time of the initial soft tissue repair. This may be delayed several weeks if infection is feared or complicates the wound, or when the nerve transection is blunt and the anatomy is distorted (such as with propeller blade or power saw injuries, or following compound fractures). When peripheral nerve lesions remain in continuity, the decision to operate is usually based on whether functional recovery and reinnervation has occurred after allowing several months for regeneration. If the nerve fails to regenerate or exhibits poor reinnervation, surgery is often indicated. Operative exploration of the site of injury allows visual inspection of the injured nerve which is useful in determining the extent of injury to the nerve, particularly to its supporting nerve structures. However, visual inspection only is notoriously inadequate in determining the severity of nerve injuries that are in continuity and cannot establish whether some axons have regenerated and bridged across the injured segment. Injured nerves may look good by inspection but show no evidence of regeneration due to endoneurial damage and fibrosis. In contrast, a nerve may look very bad at the time of exploration, with fibrosis and enlargement, yet with satisfactory regenerating axons.

Intraoperative recordings are performed by using two electrode pairs that hooks on the exposed nerve and are used for stimulating the nerve proximal to the lesion while recording distal to it. The purpose of this study is to try to record a CNAP across the lesion and to establish if some axons cross the injured segment, and if so, how many. If there is no distal CNAP, the recording electrode should be moved proximally until a CNAP is recorded. This indicates the distal end of conducting axons and is most important in evaluating a long lesion that extends a considerable distance, such as with extensive fibrosis due to hemorrhage, infection, or ischemia.

Electrodiagnostic Studies During the Recovery Phase

Once the diagnosis of the nerve injury is secure, the optimal timing of the repeat EDX studies depends mostly on the pathophysiology of the lesion, the nerve injured, and location of the nerve injury. Improvement following peripheral nerve injury depends on remyelination, reinnervation, or both. Reinnervation may follow collateral sprouting (in partial axon loss lesions only), proximodistal axon regeneration, or both. Recovery is quick and often complete with demyelinative conduction block lesions, while improvement is protracted and usually incomplete in axon loss lesions. In mixed lesions, the recovery is biphasic with an initial rapid improvement due to remyelination and a slower phase due to regeneration.

Reinnervation by Collateral Sprouting

Collateral sprouting is a process in which the surviving (intact) motor axons send axon terminals (sprouts) to the denervated muscles in an attempt to reinnervate these muscle fibers and restore muscle power. This is a quick and effective method of reinnervation that applies only to partial axon loss lesions where some axons escape injury and wallerian degeneration. Collateral sprouting is clinically effective in restoring function when only a modest number of axons are injured. In practice, it is most effective when less than 80+ of the axons are damaged. In very severe lesions, collateral sprouting may lead to little or no change of motor function.

Collateral sprouting in partial axon loss lesions starts as early as 1–2 days after injury. However, the early signs of reinnervation first become evident on needle EMG by one month, and are usually definite by 2–3 months postinjury. Immediately following nerve injury, there is a decrease in MUAP recruitment in affected muscles that is appropriate to the number of lost axons. In the first few weeks after injury, MUAPs of surviving axons retain their normal morphology. As collateral sprouting proceeds, muscle fibers become progressively incorporated to the territory of the motor unit.

Early on, the collateral axons (sprouts) have thin or incomplete myelin. Hence, action potentials along collateral sprouts conduct slowly. This is often reflected on needle EMG by MUAPs with satellite potentials (linked or parasite potentials), late spikes of the MUAP that are distinct and time-locked with the main potentials. The satellite potential trails the main MUAP because the newly formed nerve terminal may be long, or small and thinly myelinated, or both, resulting in slower conduction. When a satellite potential is suspected on needle EMG, it is useful to use a trigger line to demonstrate that this potential is time-locked to the main potential (Figure C1-7).

Reinnervation MUAPs, including satellite potentials, may be unstable (Figure C1-8). The MUAPs may show evidence of intermittent nerve conduction blocking or neuromuscular junction blocking due insecure action potential transmission at the sprout or endplate, respectively. This results in individual muscle fibers being either blocked or come to action potential at varying intervals, leading to a MUAP that changes in configuration from impulse to impulse (amplitude or number of phases or both). Over time, the sprout matures and the conduction velocity increases and the satellite potential then fires more closely to the main potential, and ultimately fuses to become an additional phase or serration within the main MUAP complex (Figure C1-9). In general, MUAPs become more stable, more polyphasic, and longer in duration as collateral sprouting continues. In very chronic lesions, MUAPs are typically stable with long duration and high amplitude and little or no polyphasia, reflecting the maturity of all the nerve sprouts (Figure C1-10). Also, as reinnervation proceeds, there is a decline in the number of fibrillation potentials, since reinnervated muscle fibers will cease to generate this spontaneous activity.

On NCSs, the CMAP and SNAP amplitudes slowly increase in size with time as reinnervation continues. In mild to moderate nerve lesions, effective reinnervation may render the CMAP within normal values, and result in NCSs that do not clearly show evidence of a remote nerve injury. In these situations, however, needle EMG will continue to confirm the old injury by exhibiting large MUAPs that fire rapidly.

Reinnervation by Axon Regeneration

In complete or very severe axon loss peripheral nerve lesions, improvement is dependent solely or primarily on axonal regeneration that may occur spontaneously or following surgical repair. Unfortunately, in most cases of nerve injury, regeneration is slow and incomplete. In more severe axon loss lesions, the regenerating axons may not find intact endoneurial tubes and sometimes form a neuroma with tangled axons at the site of injury. In such lesions as well as lesions with complete transection, surgical repair is often needed.

In humans, the axons have to first traverse the injured segment. This may be achieved in 8–15 days when the endoneurial tubes are intact (second degree nerve lesion). Once the axons cross successfully, they continue to regenerate at a slow rate averaging 1 to 2 mm/day (or about 1 inch/month). Based on this, the timing of repeat EDX studies in complete or severe axon loss lesions depends on the site of injury in relation to the most proximal muscle that is expected to be reinnervated first. For example, following a median nerve injury in the middle of the arm, the first muscle expected to show reinnervation is the pronator teres muscle with its branch arising from the nerve in the antecubital fossa. If the distance between this lesion and the muscle is 5 inches, then the repeat study should be done about five to six months after the injury. The timing of surgical intervention is based on the fact that muscles that do not reinnervate after 18–24 months will undergo atrophy and fibrosis and their muscle fibers will not be more viable. With more proximal severe or complete axon loss nerve lesions, such as those of the lower brachial plexus or sciatic nerve, the target muscles to be reinnervated (hand muscles or leg muscles respectively) are situated far from the site of injury so that early surgical intervention is often necessary.

On needle EMG, the early signs of regeneration can be confirmed by the appearance of small, complex, unstable MUAPs, sometimes referred to as “nascent” MUAPs, that precedes the onset of visible voluntary contraction. These units appear first in muscles nearest to the site of the injury and progress distally, and hence are useful in assessing the advancement of this proximodistal regeneration. Nascent MUAPs are very low in amplitude and extremely polyphasic, with normal or increased duration. These small nascent MUAPs mimic the MUAPs seen with necrotizing myopathies. Nascent MUAPs are often unstable due to conduction or neuromuscular junction blocking and are associated with decreased MUAP recruitment (Figure C1-11). As reinnervation proceeds, nascent MUAPs that are unstable become transformed into stable, long-duration, and polyphasic MUAPs, reflecting increased numbers of muscle fibers per motor unit, full myelination of the regenerating axons, and the maturity of the neuromuscular junctions. Similar to what is seen in reinnervation by collateral sprouting, there is also a decline in the number of fibrillation potentials and the progressive improvement of the SNAP and CMAP on NCS. However, in these severe or complete nerve lesions, it is common that the CMAP and SNAP never return to baseline values and there is often permanent slowing and dispersion of the CMAPs due to the extreme variability in the diameter and myelination of the regenerated axons that results in significant differential slowing of conduction velocities.

Aberrant Regeneration

Aberrant regeneration occurs when regenerating axons are misdirected into new end organs and is most common in axon loss nerve injuries that distort the endoneurial tubes (third degree or more) and in proximal peripheral nerve or root injuries. Misdirected fibers may not find endoneurial tubes and generate a neuroma at the site of the lesion. Regenerating motor axons in a mixed sensorimotor nerve may elongate into sensory nerves or vice versa. Motor axons may also get misdirected into the wrong muscles and result in co-contraction of muscles that can interfere with the intended function or cause abnormal movements.

The most common neurologic sequelae of aberrant reinnervation occur after facial nerve injury including after idiopathic Bell’s palsy. Aberrant regeneration between motor axons results in facial synkinesis, mainly contraction of the lower facial muscles on the affected side whenever there is an eye blink or vice versa. Other much less common, yet more publicized, examples of abnormal regeneration patterns are the “crocodile tears,” manifested as lacrimation of the ipsilateral eye during chewing, and the Marin-Amat syndrome, or “jaw-winking,” manifested as closure of the ipsilateral eyelid when the jaw opens.

Another example of aberrant regeneration occurs following injury to the C5 spinal root. Motor axons destined to the diaphragm may get misdirected to one or more shoulder muscles (biceps, deltoid, or spinati) with the result that the shoulder muscles fire in time with the respiratory cycle (breathing arm). Similar phenomena were recently reported form obstetric brachial plexopathies involving the lower plexus and T1 cervical roots and resulting in aberrant reinnervation of hand muscles from axons destined into intercostal muscles (breathing hand).

SUGGESTED READINGS

Brushart TME. Central course of digital axons within the median nerve. J Comp Neurol. 1991;311:197-209.

Chaudhry V, Cornblath DR. Wallerian degeneration in human nerves: serial electrophysiologic studies. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15:687-693.

Cornblath DR, et al. Conduction block in clinical practice. Muscle Nerve. 1991;14:869-871.

Fowler CJ, Danta G, Gilliatt RW. Recovery of nerve conduction after a pneumatic tourniquet: observation on the hind-limb of the baboon. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1972;35:638-647.

Gilliatt RW, Taylor JC. Electrical changes following section of the facial nerve. Proc R Soc Med. 1959;52:1080.

Jabaley ME, Wallace WH, Heckler FR. Internal topography of major nerves of the forearm and hand: a current view. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1980;5:1-18.

Katirji MB, Wilbourn AJ. Common peroneal mononeuropathy: a clinical and electrophysiologic study of 116 lesions. Neurology. 1988;38:1723-1728.

Kimura J, et al. Relation between size of compound sensory or muscle action potentials, and length of nerve segment. Neurology. 1986;36:647-652.

Kline DG. Surgical repair of peripheral nerve injury. Muscle Nerve. 1990;13:843-852.

Miller RG. Injury to peripheral motor nerves. Muscle Nerve. 1987;10:698-710.

Oh SJ, Kim DE, Kuruoglu HR. What is the best diagnostic index of conduction block and temporal dispersion? Muscle Nerve. 1994;17:489-493.

Rhee RK, England JD, Sumner AJ. Computer simulation of conduction block: effects produced by actual block versus interphase cancellation. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:146-159.

Robinson LR. Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:863-873.

Seddon H. Three types of nerve injury. Brain. 1943;66:237-288.

Spinner RJ, Kline DG. Surgery for peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries or other nerve lesions. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:680-695.

Stewart JD. Peripheral nerve fascicles: anatomy and clinical relevance. Muscle Nerve. 2003;28:525-541.

Sunderland S. The anatomy and physiology of nerve injury. Muscle Nerve. 1990;13:771-784.

Sunderland S. Nerve injuries and their repair: a critical appraisal. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1991.

Taylor PK. CMAP dispersion, amplitude decay and area decay in a normal population. Muscle Nerve. 1993;16:1181-1187.

Wilbourn AJ. Nerve conduction studies: types, components, abnormalities and value in localization. Neurol Clin N Am. 2002;20:305-338.