Chapter 7
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
1. Understand and select an appropriate exercise protocol based on the reason for performing the test.
2. Identify the ventilatory/anaerobic threshold.
3. Describe two methods for measuring ventilation, oxygen consumption, and carbon dioxide production during exercise.
4. Identify indications for terminating a cardiopulmonary stress test.
1. Describe the normal physiologic changes that occur during exercise when workload is increased.
2. Classify exercise limitation as caused by cardiovascular, ventilatory, gas exchange, or blood gas abnormalities or deconditioning.
3. Understand the importance of evaluating breathing kinetics during exercise.
1. Presence and nature of ventilatory limitations to work
2. Presence and nature of cardiovascular limitations to work
3. Extent of conditioning or deconditioning
4. Maximum tolerable workload and safe levels of daily exercise
5. Extent of disability for rehabilitation purposes
6. Oxygen (O2) desaturation and appropriate levels of supplemental O2 therapy
7. Outcome measurement after a treatment plan (e.g., surgery or medical)
Exercise protocols
In a typical incremental test, the patient’s workload increases at predetermined intervals (Table 7-1). The workload may be increased at intervals of 1–6 minutes. Measurements (e.g., BP or blood gases) are usually made during the last 20–30 seconds of each or alternating intervals. Complex measurements (e.g., cardiac output) may require longer intervals. Computerized systems that continuously measure ventilation, gas exchange, and cardiopulmonary variables permit shorter intervals to be used. The combination of intervals and work increments should allow the patient to reach exhaustion or symptom limitation within a reasonable period. An incremental test lasting 8–10 minutes after a warm-up is typically used as the target. If a computerized cycle ergometer is used, a “ramp” test may be performed. In a ramp protocol, the ergometer’s resistance is increased continuously at a predetermined rate (usually measured in watts per minute).
Table 7-1
Treadmill | Speed (mph)/Grade (%) | Interval (min) | Comment |
Bruce | 1.7/10 2.5/12 3.4/14 4.2/16 5.0/18 5.5/20 6.0/22 |
3 | Large workload increments; 1.7/0 and 1.7/5 may be used as preliminary stages for deconditioned patients |
Balke | 3.3–3.4/0 increasing grade by 2.5% to exhaustion | 1 | Small workload increments; may use 3 mph and 2-minute intervals for deconditioned subjects, or reduce slope changes to 1% |
Jones | 1.0/0 2.0/0 2–3.5/2.5 increasing grade by 2.5% to exhaustion |
1 | Small workload increments and low starting workload |
Cycle Ergometer | Workload | Interval (min) | Comment |
Astrand | 50 W/min (300 kpm) to exhaustion | 4 | Large workload increments and long intervals; 33 W (200 kpm) may be used for women |
“RAMP” | Variable (e.g., 5, 10, 15) W/min to exhaustion | Continuous | Requires electronically braked ergometer; different work rates may be used to alter ramp slope |
Jones | 16 W/min (100 kpm) to exhaustion | 1 | Smaller increments (50 kpm) may be used for deconditioned subjects |
Other | Description | Interval (min) | Comment |
Master step test | Either constant or variable step height combined with increasing step rates | Variable | Simple to perform; workload may be difficult to qualify |
6MWT | Distance covered in 6 minutes of free walking | 6 | Simple; useful in patients with limited reserves or for evaluation of rehabilitation; can also be done for 12 minutes |
Steady-state tests are designed to assess cardiopulmonary function under conditions of constant metabolic demand. Steady-state conditions are usually defined in terms of HR, oxygen consumption (o2), or ventilation (E). If the HR remains unchanged for 1 minute at a given workload, a steady state may be assumed. Steady-state tests are useful for assessing responses to a known workload. Steady-state protocols may be used to evaluate the effectiveness of various therapies or pharmacologic agents on exercise ability. For example, an incremental test may be performed initially to determine a patient’s maximum tolerable workload. Then a steady-state test may be used to evaluate specific variables at a submaximal level, such as 50% and 75% of the highest o2 achieved. The patient exercises for 5–8 minutes at a predetermined level to allow a steady state to develop. Measurements are performed during the last 1 or 2 minutes of the period. Successive steady-state determinations at higher power outputs may be made continuously or spaced with short periods of light exercise or rest. A similar protocol may be used for evaluation of exercise-induced bronchospasm (see Chapter 9).
The six-minute walk test is a simple test that does not require any sophisticated equipment. It is typically performed to assess response to a medical or surgical intervention but has also been used to assess functional capacity as well as to estimate morbidity and mortality. A 100-foot (minimum) hallway that is free of obstructions is needed to perform the test (Figure 7-1). Equipment needed includes the following:
• A method to mark the endpoints of the course (small traffic cones)
• Sphygmomanometer and appropriate sized cuff
• Rating of perceived exertion scale (Borg scale)
• Easy access to the emergency response team (e.g., telephone, nurse call light)
An oxygen delivery device should be available, if appropriate. A pulse oximeter is a useful adjunct but is not required. The objective of the test is to have the patient walk as far as possible in 6 minutes. The patient should be encouraged throughout the test, and it has been recommended that standard phrases be used to reduce intratester and test-to-test variability. Resting during the tests is permitted with encouragement to continue walking as soon as possible, while the timer continues to run. If pulse oximetry is measured, it should be done at the beginning and end of exercise but not during exercise unless a telemetry-type oximeter is available. Documentation should include the distance walked, the oxygen flow and delivery device if used, the mode of oxygen transport (e.g., pulling an O2 cart has a different impact on work than carrying a unit), and the ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). See Table 7-2 for an example of a data record used to record six-minute walk data from a patient.
Table 7-2
Date | Distance (ft) | Inspired Gas | Mode of O2 Transport | SpO2 (End Exercise) | RPE (6–20) |
5/18/2011 | 1173 | 3.0 L/min NC | Patient carried unit | 90 | 17 |
7/26/2011 | 1266 | 3.0 L/min NC | Patient carried unit | 94 | 18 |
8/15/2011 | 1420 | 2.5 L/min | Patient carried unit | 92 | 17 |
Exercise workload
Two methods of varying exercise workload are commonly used: the treadmill and the cycle ergometer (Figures 7-2 and 7-3). Each device has advantages and disadvantages (Table 7-3). Other methods sometimes used include arm ergometers, steps, and free running or walking (as previously described for the 6MWT).
Table 7-3
Advantages | Disadvantages | |
Treadmill | Natural form of exercise Easy to calibrate Higher o2max |
Risk of accidents Patient anxiety Motion artifact Difficult to obtain blood Difficult to quantify work |
Cycle ergometer | Safer than treadmill Easy to monitor Easy to quantify work Easy to obtain blood |
Difficult to calibrate Leg fatigue more of an issue Lower o2max |
The cycle ergometer allows workload to be varied by adjustment of the resistance to pedaling and by the pedaling frequency, usually specified in revolutions per minute (rpm). The flywheel of a mechanical ergometer turns against a belt or strap, both ends of which are connected to a weighted physical balance. The diameter of the wheel is known, and the resistance can be easily measured. When pedaling speed (usually 50–90 rpm) is determined, the amount of work performed can be accurately calculated. One of the chief advantages of the cycle ergometer is that the workload is independent of the weight of the patient. Unlike the treadmill, o2 can be reasonably estimated if the pedaling speed and resistance are carefully measured. The normal relationship of workload in watts to oxygen consumption is 10 mL/watt. Another advantage of ergometers is better stability of the patient for gas collection, blood sampling, and blood pressure monitoring. Electronically braked cycle ergometers (see Figure 7-3) provide a smooth, rapid, and more reproducible means of changing exercise workload than mechanical ergometers. Electronically braked ergometers allow continuous adjustment of workload independent of pedaling speed. However, accuracy of the ergometer output may be dependent on a manufacturer’s specified pedal cadence range (e.g., 40–100 rpm). This feature permits the exercise level to be ramped (i.e., the workload increases continuously rather than in increments). The ramp test allows the patient to advance from low to high workloads quickly and provides all of the information normally sought during a progressive maximal exercise test. A ramp protocol typically requires electronic control (usually by a computer) for adjustment of the workload and rapid collection of physiologic data. Box 7-1 provides a systematic method of determining the desired workload increments using a cycle ergometer.
Workload may be expressed quantitatively in several ways:
• Work is normally expressed in kilopond-meters (kpm). One kilopond-meter equals the work of moving a 1-kg mass a vertical distance of 1 m against the force of gravity.
• Power is expressed in kilopond-meters per minute (i.e., work per unit of time) or in watts. One watt equals 6.12 kpm/min (100 watts = ∼ 600 kpm/min). The normal relationship of work, in watts, to oxygen consumption is 10 mL/watt.
• Energy is expressed by oxygen consumption (o2), in liters or milliliters per minute (STPD) or in terms of metabolic equivalents (METs). Resting or baseline o2 can be measured as described in the following paragraphs or estimated. For purposes of standardization, 1 MET is considered equal to 3.5 mL O2/min/kg.
A number of cardiopulmonary exercise variables may be used, depending on the clinical questions to be answered. Schemes for measuring these variables are described in Table 7-4. Graded exercise with monitoring of only BP and ECG may be limited to the evaluation of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease.
Table 7-4
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Variables
Variables Measured | Uses |
ECG, blood pressure, SpO2 | Limited to suspected or known coronary artery disease; pulse oximetry may be misleading if used without blood gases |
All of the above plus ventilation o2, co2, and derived measurements | Noninvasive estimate of ventilatory/anerobic threshold (AT), quantify workload; discriminate between cardiovascular and pulmonary limitation to work |
All of the above plus arterial blood gases | Detailed assessment of gas exchange abnormalities; calculation of VD/VT; titration of O2 In exercise desaturation; measurement of pH and lactate possible |
All of the above plus mixed venous blood gases | Cardiac output by Fick method, noninvasive techniques, calculation of shunt, thermodilution cardiac output, pulmonary artery pressures, calculation of pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances |
Cardiovascular monitors during exercise
Heart Rate and Electrocardiogram
Heart rate and rhythm should be monitored continuously using one or more modified chest leads. Standard precordial chest lead configurations (V1–V6) allow comparison with resting 12-lead tracings (Criteria for Acceptability 7-1). Twelve-lead monitoring during exercise is practical with electrocardiographs designed for exercise testing. These instruments incorporate filters (digital or analog) that eliminate movement artifact and provide ST-segment monitoring. Limb leads normally must be moved to the torso for ergometer or treadmill testing (modified leads). A resting ECG should be performed to record both the standard and modified leads. Single-lead monitoring allows only for gross arrhythmia detection and HR determination. It may not be adequate for testing patients with known or suspected cardiac disease.
The ECG monitor should allow the assessment of intervals and segments up to the patient’s maximal heart rate (HRmax). Computerized arrhythmia recording or manual “freeze-frame” storage allows the subsequent evaluation of conduction abnormalities while the testing protocol continues (Figure 7-4). Some digital ECG systems generate computerized “median” complexes averaged from a series of beats. These may be helpful in analyzing ST-segment depression. The “raw,” or nondigitized, ECG should also be available. Significant ST-segment changes should be easily identifiable from the tracing up to the predicted HRmax.
Motion artifact is the most common cause of unacceptable ECG recordings during exercise. Allowing the patient to practice pedaling on the ergometer or walking on the treadmill permits adequacy of the ECG signal to be checked. Carefully applied electrodes, proper skin preparation, and secured lead wires greatly minimize movement artifact (see Criteria for Acceptability 7-1). Electrodes specifically designed for exercise testing are helpful. Most of these use extra adhesive to ensure electrical contact even when the patient begins perspiring. The skin sites should be carefully prepared. Removal of surface skin cells by gentle abrasion is recommended. Patients with excessive body hair may require shaving of the electrode site to ensure good electrical contact. Lead wires must be securely attached to the electrodes. Devices that limit the movement of the lead wires can greatly reduce motion artifact. Spare electrodes and lead wires should be available to avoid test interruption in the event of an electrode failure.
Equation 1 yields slightly higher predicted values in young adults. Equation 2 produces higher values in older adults. Other methods of predicting HRmax vary, depending on the type of exercise protocol used in deriving the regression data. Specific criteria for terminating an exercise test should include factors based on symptom limitation as well as HR and BP changes (see the section on safety).
Increases in stroke volume account for a smaller portion of the increase in CO, primarily at low and moderate workloads (Figure 7-5). While HR increases from 70 beats/min up to 200 beats/min in young healthy upright patients, SV increases from 80 mL to approximately 110 mL. At low workloads, increase in CO depends on the patient’s ability to increase both HR and SV. At high workloads, further increases in CO result almost entirely from the increase in HR.
Reduced HR response may occur in patients who have ischemic heart disease or complete heart block (Interpretive Strategies 7-1). Low HR is also common in patients who have been treated with drugs that block the effects of the sympathetic nervous system (β-blockers, calcium channel blockers). HR response may also be reduced if the autonomic nervous system is impaired or the heart is denervated, as occurs after cardiac transplantation (e.g., chronotropic insufficiency).
The most common arrhythmia that occurs during exercise testing is the premature ventricular contraction (PVC) (see Figure 7-4). Exercise-induced PVCs occurring at a rate of more than 10 per minute are often found in ischemic heart disease. Increased PVCs during exercise may also be seen in mitral valve prolapse. Coupled PVCs (couplets) often precede ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Occurrence of couplets or frequent PVCs may be an indication for terminating the exercise evaluation. Some patients with PVCs at rest or at low workloads may have these ectopic beats suppressed as exercise intensity increases. The most serious ventricular arrhythmias are sometimes seen in the immediate post-exercise phase.
Shortness of breath (SOB) brought on by exertion is perhaps the most widespread indication for cardiopulmonary exercise evaluation. The combination of cardiovascular parameters (e.g., HR, SV) with data obtained from the analysis of exhaled gas (i.e., o2) permits the assessment of dyspnea on exertion. Table 7-5 generalizes some of the basic relationships between cardiovascular and pulmonary exercise responses. These relationships help delineate whether exertional dyspnea is a result of cardiac or pulmonary disease, or whether the patient is simply deconditioned. In some instances, poor effort may mimic exertional dyspnea. Comparison of data from cardiovascular and exhaled gas variables can confirm inadequate patient effort.
Table 7-5
Exercise Variables and Dyspnea*
Cardiac | Ventilatory | Deconditioned | Poor Effort | |
o2max | Less than 80% of predicted | Less than 80% of predicted | Less than 80% of predicted | Less than 80% of predicted |
Emax | Less than 70% of MVV | Greater than 90% of MVV; Emax less than 15 L | Less than 70% of MVV | Variable |
Anaerobic threshold | Achieved at low o2 | Usually not achieved | Achieved at low o2 | Not achieved |
HR | Greater than 85% of predicted | Less than 85% of predicted | Greater than 85% of predicted | Less than 85% of predicted |
ECG/signs of ischemia | ST changes, arrhythmias, chest pain | Usually normal | Normal | Normal |
Sao2 | Greater than 90% | Often less than 90%, hypoxemia | Greater than 90% | Greater than 90% |
MVV, Maximal voluntary ventilation; SaO2, arterial oxygen saturation.
*This table compares the usual findings for the exercise variables listed in subjects with dyspnea caused by cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, or deconditioning. Some subjects may have dyspnea because of a combination of causes. Poor effort during exercise may result from improper instruction, lack of understanding by the subject, or lack of motivation by the subject.
Blood Pressure
Continuous monitoring of the BP may be accomplished by the connection of a pressure transducer to an indwelling arterial catheter (Figure 7-6). An indwelling line allows the continuous display and recording of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures. In addition, the catheter provides ready access for arterial blood sampling. Arterial catheterization may be easily accomplished using either the radial or the brachial site. The catheter must be adequately secured to prevent loss of patency during vigorous exercise. Insertion of arterial catheters presents some risk of blood splashing or spills. Adequate protection for the individual inserting the catheter, as well as for those withdrawing specimens, is essential. See Chapter 6 for specific recommendations regarding arterial sampling via catheters.
Systolic BP increases in healthy patients during exercise from 120 mm Hg up to approximately 200–250 mm Hg (see Figure 7-5). Diastolic pressure normally rises only slightly (10–15 mm Hg) or not at all. The mean arterial pressure rises from approximately 90 mm Hg to approximately 110 mm Hg, depending on the changes in systolic and diastolic pressures. The increase in systolic pressure is caused almost completely by increased CO and mostly by the SV. Even though CO may increase fivefold, (e.g., from 5–25 L/min), the systolic pressure only increases twofold. Systolic pressure only doubles because of the tremendous decrease in peripheral vascular resistance. Most of this decrease in resistance results from vasodilatation in exercising muscles. Increased systolic pressure (>250–300 mm Hg) should be considered an indication for terminating the exercise evaluation (Box 7-2). Similarly, if the systolic pressure fails to rise with increasing workload, the exercise test should be terminated and the patient’s condition stabilized. Variations in BP during exercise are often caused by the patient’s respiratory effort. Phasic changes with respiration are particularly common in patients who have large transpulmonary pressures because of lung disease (i.e., pulsus paradoxus). Differences of as much as 30 mm Hg between inspiration and expiration may be seen during the continuous monitoring of arterial pressure.