Cancers of the skin

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1537 times

14 Cancers of the skin

Cutaneous melanoma

Pathology

There are four histological variants of cutaneous melanoma:

Other forms of melanoma include ocular, mucosal and vulval (p. 236).

The histology of melanomas is very variable depending on the specific subtype and primary site. Many of the features assessed by histology have prognostic value (Box 14.1). In addition to these the pathologist should report the type of melanoma, greatest thickness, radial or vertical growth phase, excision margins and immunohistochemical stains. Immunohistochemical stains used in melanoma include S100 (the most frequently used but also stains benign melanocytes), HMB-45, Mitf, MART-1 and tyrosinase.

Staging

Breslow thickness, ulceration and mitotic count are most important prognostic factors of localized disease whereas Clark level is an independent prognostic factor for melanoma of <1 mm thickness (Box 14.1). Staging is by TNM AJCC system and is related to prognosis (Table 14.1). M1a includes distant skin, subcutaneous or nodal metastases with a normal LDH. M1b is lung metastases with a normal LDH and M1c is with any other metastases or with a raised LDH level.

Table 14.1 TNM staging & 5-year survival of cutaneous melanoma

Staging 5-year survival (%)
Stage IA 95
T1aN0M0 ≤1 mm thickness without ulceration and mitosis <1/mm2  
Stage IB 91
T1bN0M0 ≤1 mm thickness with ulceration or mitosis ≥1/mm2  
T2aN0M0 1.01–2 mm thickness without ulceration  
Stage IIA 77–79
T2bN0M0 1.01–2 mm thickness with ulceration  
T3aN0M0 2.01–4 mm thickness without ulceration  
Stage IIB 63–67
T3bN0M0 2.01–4 mm thickness with ulceration  
T4aN0M0 >4 mm thickness without ulceration  
Stage IIC 45
T4bN0M0 >4 mm thickness with ulceration  
Stage IIIA  
T1-4aN1aM0 Micrometastasis* in 1 node 70
T1-4aN2aM0 Micrometastasis in 2–3 nodes 63
Stage IIIB  
T1-4bN1a/2aM0 50–53
T1-4aN1bM0 Macrometastasis** in 1 node 46–59
T1-4aN2bM0 Macrometastasis in 2–3 nodes 46–59
T1-4aN2cM0 in-transit metastases/satellites without nodes  
Stage IIIC 24–29
T1-4bN1b/2b/2cM0  
Any T N3M0 metastasis in >3 nodes or matted nodes or in-transit or satellites with metastatic nodes  
Stage IV  
Any T, any N, M1 distant metastasis 7–19%

*micrometastases after sentinel node biopsy; **macrometastases are clinically detectable pathologically confirmed nodes.

Management

Non-metastatic disease

Management of regional lymph node

The role of elective lymph node excision for node negative patients has being debated for several years. Although initial retrospective studies showed a survival benefit with this approach, four randomized studies failed to show any survival advantage. Debate on the role of elective node dissection has been subsumed by emergence of the sentinel node concept.

The sentinel node (SN) is the node to which the lymph initially drains from a tumour before passing to the other regional nodes. In theory the sentinel node is most likely to contain the tumour cells and if none are present in this node, it is unlikely that other lymph nodes are involved.

The risk of sentinel node metastasis depends on the thickness of lesion. A tumour less than 0.8 mm thick has 1% SN positivity, 0.8 to 1.5 mm has 8%, 1.5–4 mm thickness has 23% and more than 4 mm thickness has 36% risk. Although, sentinel node positivity is proven to have strong correlation with survival (90% 5-year survival for SN negative vs. 56% for SN positive), the role of lymph node dissection for SN positive disease is still evolving. Many agree that there is no proven overall survival benefit from the routine application of SN to patients with cutaneous melanoma. However, there is some suggestion that it may increase the disease free survival.

Patients with >4 mm thick lesions have a predicted incidence of SN positivity of 30–40%. Hence it is reasonable to offer SN in this group of patients to provide prognostic information and selection into clinical trials.

The ongoing MSLT-II trial aims to examine the benefit of complete dissection on survival by randomizing patients with SN positive melanoma to undergo either complete nodal dissection or observation.

Management of metastatic disease

Metastatic melanoma has a poor prognosis. Most patients with non-visceral metastases survive up to 18 months whereas the median survival of those with visceral involvement or an elevated serum LDH is 4–6 months. Lymph node and skin metastases in the absence of other metastases have the best prognosis (up to 18 months). Those with lung metastases in the absence of other visceral disease have an intermediate prognosis (up to 12 months median survival). Those with other visceral disease have a median survival of less than 6 months which is limited further in the presence of a high and rapidly increasing LDH. Patients with liver metastases from a primary uveal melanoma have a particularly poor prognosis usually limited to less than 3 months.

Treatment of melanoma metastases depends on the site of disease, whether or not it is localized and the overall fitness of the patient. Treatment can be with surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapies or best supportive care.

Chemotherapy and other systemic treatments in metastatic disease

Dacarbazine is the standard intravenous chemotherapy drug for metastatic melanoma with a response rate of 10–20% and a median duration of response of 3–6 months. It is given 3–4 weekly at doses of 850–1000 mg/m2 with nausea as the main side effect. Temozolamide is an oral analogue of dacarbazine and crosses the blood–brain barrier but is more expensive and has no improvement in response rates compared with dacarbazine (Table 14.2). There is no evidence that combination chemotherapy regime is superior to single agent drugs in terms of response rates or survival.

Table 14.2 Response rates (%) for single agents in metastatic melanoma

Agent % Response rate (CR + PR)
Dacarbazine 20
Temozolamide 21
Carmustine (BCNU) 18
Lomustine (CCNU) 13
Cisplatin 23
Carboplatin 16
Vinblastine 13
Paclitaxel 18
Docetaxel 15

Immunotherapy with high dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) or interferon alpha has shown response rates of 10–21%. Toxicities include hypotension, capillary leak syndrome, sepsis and renal failure.

A recent study of ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), showed improved overall survival in previously treated patients with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma who were positive for HLA-A*0201. Side effects of this treatment included rash, colitis, diarrhoea and hepatitis.

Combining chemotherapy with an immune modulator has been assessed in several clinical trials. A meta-analysis showed that this improved response rates, but did not translate into a survival benefit.

In summary no drug or combination of drugs has shown a significant response rate and survival benefit over single agent dacarbazine. It remains the standard drug in metastatic melanoma but patients should be entered into clinical trials where possible.

Non-cutaneous melanoma

Ocular melanoma

Ocular melanoma is a rare subtype of melanoma which can occur in many areas of the eye. Most commonly it occurs in the choroid but less than 5% occur in the iris. The aetiology is uncertain; some studies suggest a link with UV radiation. The risks are higher in those who have had cutaneous melanoma, pale iris colour or who have a family history of ocular melanoma. The staging system differs to that of cutaneous melanoma.

Poor prognostic factors include age over 60, size and involvement of the ciliary body. Although often localized at presentation they have a high risk (10–80% depending on number of prognostic factors) to spread to the liver, often several years after successful treatment of the primary. Long-term survival is less than 35% even with successful treatment of the primary. Surgery used to be the standard treatment but radiotherapy has replaced this in most cases. Radiotherapy can be administered as external beam, as a radio-active plaque (e.g. iridium-192) or with protons or other charged particles. Local control rates are similar with each technique. The vision is often lost in the irradiated eye with the list of complications including cataracts, glaucoma, retinopathy and vitreous haemorrhage.

Treatment of metastases in ocular melanoma has shown that they tend to have a reduced response rate to chemotherapy and immunotherapy than cutaneous melanoma and are more rapidly progressive.

Due to their propensity for metastases (especially liver and lung) which can be delayed, follow-up includes imaging of the liver and lungs in addition to LDH and liver function tests. Combined follow-up with ophthalmology is required.

Basal cell carcinoma

Clinical features

The common growth patterns are superficial, multifocal, nodular and morphoeic (Figure 14.2). The sites affected are head and neck (52%), trunk (27%), upper limb (13%) and lower limb (8%).

Other histolological subtypes are uncommon and do not have any characteristic clinical presentation.

Treatment

Treatment is aimed at eradication of tumour with acceptable cosmetic and functional outcome. A number of treatment options are available (Box 14.2) and the choice of treatment in small BCC depends on various factors (Box 14.3). Radiotherapy is indicated when cosmetic and/or functional outcome is better with radiotherapy compared with surgery and when there is a need to avoid complex plastic surgery.

Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy results in 93–95% 10-year control rate for BCC of ≤2 cm. Radiotherapy details are given in Box 14.4.

Box 14.4
Radiotherapy for skin cancer

Radiotherapy dose

BCC is thought to be more radiosensitive than SCC. Equivalent doses for BCC and SCC and rough guide for selection of fractionation regime are as follows:

BCC SCC
60 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks* 60–66 Gy/30–32 fractions
50 Gy/20 fractions/4 weeks* 55 Gy/20 fractions
40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks 40 Gy/10 fractions
40.5 Gy/9 fractions/3 weeks 45 Gy/9 fractions
32.5 Gy/5 fractions/1 week 32.5 Gy/5 fractions
32 Gy/4 fractions/4 weeks** 32 Gy/4 fractions/4weeks
12–15 Gy/1 fraction** 12–15 Gy/1 fraction

Squamous cell carcinoma

Clinical presentation

Typical presentation is a raised pink papule or plaque with erosion or ulceration (Figure 14.3). In advanced cases it presents as large ulcerated masses and bleeding. Metastasis is primarily to the regional nodes (2–6%). The head and neck region is the commonest site in men whereas the upper limb followed by head and neck are the commonest sites in females. Only 8% of SCC arise on the trunk.

image

Figure 14.3 Digital squamous cell carcinoma.

From Darrell Rigel: Cancer of the Skin (Saunders) with permission.

Treatment

Three factors that influence treatment of SCC are: the need for removal of tumour locally, the possibility of ‘in-transit’ metastasis and regional nodal metastasis. Treatment options include:

Radiotherapy (see Box 14.3) – used as a primary treatment and adjuvant after surgery.
Surgical excision (see Box 14.3) and Mohs’ micrographic surgery.

Merkel cell carcinoma

Clinical features

MCC present as red or violaceous nodules with a shiny surface, often with overlying telangiectasia (Figure 14.4). Spread through dermal lymphatics can result in the development of satellite lesions. The most common site of disease is the head and neck region, followed by extremities and trunk. One-third of patients have regional nodal metastases at presentation and 50% develop distant metastasis. Liver, lung, bone and brain are the sites of distant metastases.

image

Figure 14.4 Merkel cell carcinoma.

From Darrell Rigel: Cancer of the Skin (Saunders) with permission.

Skin adnexal carcinoma

Skin adnexal carcinomas are eccrine and apocrine sweat gland carcinomas, sebaceous gland carcinoma and microcystic adnexal carcinoma. These represent 0.2% of skin cancers and usually exhibit aggressive behaviour and local recurrence. There are a number of histological subtypes.

Eccrine sweat gland carcinoma is common in the head and neck region, trunk and extremities and apocrine carcinoma is common in the axilla. These tumours exhibit an initial indolent growth followed by rapid progression including distant metastasis. Surgery is the treatment of choice which involves wide excision and elective lymph node dissection. Postoperative radiotherapy is advisable in the presence of tumour of >5 cm, deep infiltration, close (<1 mm) or positive margin, high-grade tumours, perineural infiltration, dermal lymphatic invasion, ≥4 positive nodes and extranodal invasion. Radiotherapy management is same as that of SCC.

Sebaceous carcinoma commonly occurs in the upper lid, scalp or face and is common in women. Surgery is the treatment of choice; either wide excision or Mohs’ micrographic surgery. Radiotherapy may be indicated for high risk patients such as those with a positive margin and extensive nodal involvement. However, the risk of potential damage to ocular structures needs to be considered. Elderly patients may be treated with primary radiotherapy delivering >55 Gy. 36% patients develop local recurrence and 20–25% patients die of this cancer.

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma is a locally destructive carcinoma often present as a sclerotic or indurated plaque with an intact dermis. The usual sites of involvement are mid face and lip. Wide local excision or Mohs’ surgery is the treatment of choice. Surgery is associated with a local recurrence of 50–60%. These are thought to be radioresistant tumours.

Further reading

Garbe C, Peris K, Hauschild A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:270-283.

Mouawad R, Sebert M, Michels J, et al. Treatment for metastatic malignant melanoma: old drugs and new strategies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010;74:27-39.

Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Kefford RF. Cutaneous melanoma in the era of molecular profiling. Lancet. 2009;374:362-365.

Miller AJ, Mihm MCJr. Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:51-65.

Telfer NR, Colver GB, Morton CA. Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:35-48.

Veness MJ. The important role of radiotherapy in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer and other cutaneous entities. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52:278-286.

Neville JA, Welch E, Leffell DJ. Management of nonmelanoma skin cancer in 2007. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007;4:462-469.

Rockville Merkel Cell Carcinoma Group. Merkel cell carcinoma: recent progress and current priorities on etiology, pathogenesis, and clinical management. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4021-4026.

Eng TY, Boersma MG, Fuller CD, et al. A comprehensive review of the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007;30:624-636.

Senff NJ, Noordijk EM, Kim YH, et al. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and International Society for Cutaneous Lymphoma consensus recommendations for the management of cutaneous B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2008;112:1600-1609.

Willemze R, Dreyling M. Primary cutaneous lymphoma: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(Suppl 4):115-118.