Cancers of the genitourinary system

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1414 times

12 Cancers of the genitourinary system

Cancer of the kidney

Investigations and staging

Initial investigations include urinalysis for protein, blood and cytology. Blood tests should include full blood count, urea and electrolytes, liver function, clotting and calcium levels.

Staging

Stage (Table 12.1) determines the prognosis and treatment of renal tumours.

Table 12.1 Staging of tumours of the renal parenchyma

Stage    
I T1 N0 M0

II T2 N0 M0 >7 cm in size, confined to kidney III T1/2 N1 M0 Confined to kidney, metastases in a single regional node T3 N0/1 M0 T3a Invades adrenal gland or perinephric tissues but not beyond Gerota fascia T3b Extends into renal vein(s) or vena cava below diaphragm T3c Extends into vena cava above diaphragm IV T4 N0–2 M0 T4 Invades beyond Gerota fascia T1–4 N2 M0 N2 Metastases in >1 regional node T1–4 N0–2 M1 M1 Distant metastases

Management

Surgery of the primary tumour

Metastatic disease

Interferon-alpha

Interferon alpha is a cytokine with anticancer and antiviral activity. Response rates in metastatic RCC are reported as 10–15% with a 2% complete response rate (although there are also occasional reports of spontaneous remissions off treatment) and a stable disease rate of approximately 25%. A Cochrane review showed a 3-month survival benefit with interferon compared with no interferon. Interferon may be better in ‘good’ prognosis metastatic disease, based on the number of disease sites, performance status and diagnosis to metastases interval.

The optimal regimen of interferon is not yet known. Typical dose schedules are of 9–12 mega-units subcutaneously three times per week, often starting at a lower dose to assess tolerability. Treatment is discontinued at disease progression or after 6–9 months, whichever comes first. Blood counts and liver function should be monitored during treatment.

Interferon has significant side effects (Box 12.1) that impact on quality of life. These effects are dose dependent, but the majority tend to stop quickly on discontinuation of treatment. Common side effects include fatigue, flu-like symptoms, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, anorexia, bone marrow suppression and rash at injection site.

Novel agents

Various new targeted therapies have shown positive results in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and are generally better tolerated than interferon-α and interleukin-2. Studies are now concentrated on the use of these agents in the adjuvant setting and their sequencing in metastatic disease.

Sorafenib and sunitinib are oral multiple kinase inhibitors affecting VEGF, PDGF and c-KIT tyrosine kinases among others (p. 370). They have both antiproliferative and antiangiogenic activity. A phase III trial of sorafenib versus placebo in metastatic RCC patients on second-line systemic therapy showed an improvement of progression-free survival (5.5 months versus 2.8 months respectively).

In the first line setting sunitinib has shown a median progression-free survival of 11 months in comparison with 5.1 months with interferon-α (p < 0.000001) and the median overall survival was 26.4 months with sunitinib and 21.8 months with interferon (p = 0.51). Sunitinib is the recommended treatment in the UK for patients with performance status 0–1. The dosage is 50 mg once daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week rest period (6-week cycle). Dose may be decreased in steps of 12.5 mg according to tolerance, but there is evidence that efficacy is related to dose-intensity. Adverse events include rash, diarrhoea, hand–foot skin reaction, fatigue, thrombocytopaenia and hypertension. These are usually easily managed and rarely result in permanent discontinuation of therapy.

Temsirolimus inhibits activity of mTOR, which features downstream in the cell signalling pathway and is thought to be a point into which other critical pathways feed. It is an intravenous agent which appears to improve progression-free survival when compared with interferon in metastatic RCC and has shown particular benefit in poor prognosis patients. Everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, has proven benefit in the second-line setting on progression after previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment.

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody which inhibits VEGF. In conjunction with interferon it has been shown to double progression-free survival in previously untreated metastatic RCC when compared with interferon alone.

Cancers of the urinary bladder and renal pelvis

Investigations and staging

III T3 N0

T4a N0 T4a – invades prostate, uterus, vagina IV T4b N0 T4b – invades pelvic or abdominal wall   T1–4 N1–3   M1 Distant metastases

Management

The management of bladder tumours is dependent upon the degree of invasion into the bladder wall and the histological grade of the cancer. Superficial, non-muscle invasive tumours are generally treated by transurethral resection, with intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy for multiple or recurrent tumours. Localized muscle invasive disease is treated by primary cystectomy or radiotherapy to the bladder and perivesical tissues. Figure 12.4 shows the management of bladder tumours by tumour stage. Indications for radical cystectomy are shown in Box 12.1.

Intravesical therapy

Intravesical therapy reduces short-term recurrence rates following transurethral resection. The options are chemotherapy with agents such as mitomycin, or immunotherapy with BCG. The incidence of chemical cystitis is approximately 40% with chemotherapy but 90% with BCG, so the latter is often reserved for resistant disease.

Muscle invasive disease

If disease is localized, the aim is for cure with bladder preservation if possible. In disease confined to the bladder, radical cystectomy is curative in 60–70%. Radical external beam radiotherapy might allow preservation of bladder function, but reported cure rates are lower at 50% (although no direct comparisons between surgery and radiotherapy exist). If there is spread beyond bladder (T3 disease), radical treatment is curative in <30% of patients and half of patients will develop distant metastases within 1–2 years.

Radical radiotherapy

The aim of radical radiotherapy is cure with bladder preservation. The decision between radical cystectomy and radiotherapy should be made at a multidisciplinary meeting and with involvement of the patient. Randomized studies have shown radiotherapy to have higher rates of local recurrence, but similar overall survival with close follow-up and salvage cystectomy on relapse. Approximately a third of patients treated with radiotherapy will remain cystectomy-free.

There is no survival advantage from nodal irradiation and no evidence of any benefit of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy following cystectomy.

Poor prognostic factors for radiotherapy include ureteric obstruction, incomplete transurethral resection, sessile (worse than papillary) tumour and persistence/recurrence at first cystoscopy.

Radical radiotherapy is contraindicated in those who had previous pelvic radiotherapy, history of inflammatory bowel disease or small bowel adhesions, extensive CIS, poor bladder function and multiple transurethral resections or multiple intravesical chemotherapy installations (due to reduced bladder function which may worsen with radiotherapy).

Radical radiotherapy is typically CT-planned with a target volume including a 1.5–2 cm margin around the empty bladder, prostatic urethra and tumour extension. This margin is to allow for considerable bladder movement. The rectum and femoral heads should be identified as organs at risk. Treatment is usually delivered via a 3-field plan (anterior and two laterals) to a dose of 55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks or 64 Gy in 32 fractions over 6.5 weeks using 6–10 MV photons.

Complications of radiotherapy include radiation cystitis (<5%), radiation proctitis (<5%), bowel obstruction (<3%) and erectile dysfunction (60%).

There is interest in partial bladder irradiation (or whole bladder with a second phase tumour boost to a smaller volume) with the intention of reducing toxicity whilst maintaining an effective dose to the tumour.

Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy in bladder cancer has been primarily used in the palliative and metastatic settings, but there is good evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to cystectomy. However, the platinum-based regimes are toxic and emetogenic, and many patients with invasive bladder cancer are frail with poor renal function so tolerate the chemotherapy poorly.

Chemotherapy in metastatic disease

Response rates of 40–70% have been observed with combinations such as CMV (cisplatin, methotrexate, vinblastine) and MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, cisplatin). Newer combinations such as gemcitabine and cisplatin have similar response rates and survival outcomes, with less toxicity (Box 12.2). Single agent platinum regimes are less effective (response rates of 30%).

Box 12.2
Chemotherapy regimes in bladder cancer

Gem/Cis: Gemcitabine – 1 g/m2 Day 1, 8, 15
  Cisplatin* 70 mg/m2 Day 1
  Repeat every 28 days (or 21 days omitting day 15 gemcitabine)
CMV: Cisplatin* 100 mg/m2 Day 2 only (70 mg/m2 if palliative)
  Methotrexate 30 mg/m2 Day 1 and 8
  Vinblastine 4 mg/m2 Day 1 and 8
  Repeat every 21 days
MVAC: Methotrexate 30 mg/m2 Day 2, 15, 22
  Vinblastine 3 mg/m2 Day 2, 15, 22
  Adriamycin 30 mg/m2 Day 2
  Cisplatin* 70 mg/m2 Day 2
  Repeat every 28 days

* For patients with poor renal function (creatinine clearance of 30–60 ml/min), consider replacing cisplatin with carboplatin (AUC 4–5).

Management of carcinomas of the renal pelvis and ureter

The staging of tumours of the renal pelvis and ureter is given in Table 12.3. Renal pelvic and upper urothelial transitional carcinomas are treated by radical resection of the kidney and ureter. Nephron-sparing procedures can be undertaken in small, localized tumours if there are concerns about function of the remaining kidney. Adjuvant radiotherapy confers no survival advantage following complete resection, but may be considered in patients with positive margins or residual local disease. Doses are limited by surrounding structures, but typically 45–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions can be delivered. There is some evidence to suggest that the addition of concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy to radiotherapy improves overall and disease-free survival in T3/4 and/or node-positive disease following surgical resection. The majority of relapses are distant, so systemic adjuvant therapy using platinum-containing chemotherapy regimes should be considered, although there is little published data as to the benefits of this approach. The current evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy is stronger for node positive disease than for locally advanced but node negative disease.

Table 12.3 Staging of tumours of the renal pelvis and ureter

Stage    
I T1 N0 M0 Tumour invades subepithelial connective tissue
II T2 N0 M0 Tumour invades muscularis
III T3 N0 M0 Tumour invades peripelvic (or periureteric) fat or renal parenchyma
IV T4 T4 Invades adjacent organs or perinephric fat
or N1–3

or M1 M1 Distant mets

Metastatic disease is treated with similar platinum-based chemotherapy regimes to those used in metastatic bladder cancer.

Cancer of the prostate

Presentation

The majority of prostate cancers are initially detected following a raised serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and approximately half of patients are completely asymptomatic. The PSA blood test may have been taken as part of investigations into non-specific lower urinary tract symptoms of bladder outflow obstruction such as hesitancy, frequency, nocturia and terminal dribbling, or increasingly as part of a well-man screening programme. In symptomatic patients who require a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for presumed benign prostatic hypertrophy, it is not uncommon to discover cancer cells in the prostatic chippings.

Locally advanced cancers can be detected on rectal examination, and occasionally patients may present with symptoms due to local extension such as pain or bleeding. Metastases to bone are common and bone pain or pathological fracture can be presenting features. Other areas of spread include obturator, perivesical and para-aortic lymph nodes and rarely liver, lung or brain metastases.

The strongest predictors of metastasis are a high PSA, high Gleason score (8–10) and age >70 years. The Roach formulae (based on Partin’s tables) are commonly used in treatment algorithms to predict the risk of local extension and lymph node spread (Box 12.4).

Box 12.4
Roach formulae

Risk of lymph node involvement (%): 2/3 PSA + 10 (Gleason-6)
Risk of seminal vesicle involvement (%): PSA + 10 (Gleason-6)
Risk of extracapsular extension (%): 3/2 PSA + 10 (Gleason-3)

Investigations and staging

Initial investigations include a PSA blood test and digital rectal examination (DRE). Patients with raised PSA are offered a transrectal biopsy of the prostate to obtain histological diagnosis (usually 8–12 core biopsies of the prostate are obtained, half from each lobe).

If cancer is confirmed, further investigations are determined by the grade, volume of disease and PSA level, but may include a pelvic MRI scan to define extracapsular spread and seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement (generally offered to patients with Gleason 4+3 disease or above, or with PSA >20 ng/ml, in whom radical treatment is being considered) and a bone scan (if PSA >10–15 ng/ml). If there is doubt over lymph node involvement, a laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy might be considered prior to proposed radical treatment.

Table 12.4 shows the staging of prostate cancer.

As well as the absolute PSA level, various other PSA parameters have been developed in an attempt to improve the predictive value of the test for diagnosis and monitoring:

Note that very poorly differentiated cancers may not secrete PSA and are therefore more difficult to diagnose, predict and monitor.

Management of localized disease

The treatment options for localized disease are:

Radical treatment

Radical treatment options for prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy (low-dose rate or high-dose rate). Each treatment has its own characteristics and may be suitable for certain types of patients, but reported success rates are similar if patients are chosen appropriately.

External beam radiotherapy

Conformal CT planning is well established in prostate radiotherapy (Box 12.5 and Figure 12.5). The Medical Research Council RT01 study randomized between 64 Gy and 74 Gy and found a hazard ratio for biochemical progression free survival of 0.67 (CI 0.53–0.85; p = 0.0007) in favour of the escalated group. However this was achieved at the expense of increased late bowel and bladder toxicity. It is not yet known whether there will be any improvements in overall survival.

Newer techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) might enable even further increases in the dose administered or further sparing of normal tissues.

Radiobiological studies have suggested a surprisingly low alpha-beta ratio for prostate cancer (1.2–1.5 Gy), which implies that hypofractionated courses of radiotherapy with a high dose per fraction might result in improved cancer control for a similar level of side effects. For this reason doses such as 57–60 Gy in 19–20 fractions over 4 weeks are being investigated. These shortened schedules have the additional advantage of sparing resources and being more convenient for patients.

Though the survival benefit of whole pelvic radiotherapy in high risk of pelvic lymph node involvement (≥15% on Roach criteria) remains to be demonstrated, it is commonly practised.

Acute side effects of radiotherapy include dysuria, frequency, diarrhoea, lethargy and erythema. Late effects include proctitis (diarrhoea, rectal bleeding, tenesmus: 30% mild, 5% severe), impotence (30–40%) and urinary incontinence (1–5%).

Brachytherapy

Management of locally advanced and metastatic disease

Locally advanced disease

For patients with locally advanced disease radical radiotherapy or surgery may add little or no additional benefit over hormone therapy alone, although there is emerging evidence that radiotherapy does improve biochemical control in patients with PSA levels up to 70 ng/ml. The mainstay of treatment is with LHRH analogues or anti-androgens. Prolonged treatment with LHRH analogues results in significant toxicity due to reduction of testosterone levels (see Box 12.7). Androgen receptor inhibitors, such as bicalutamide, or 5-alpha reductase inhibitors effectively reduce the delivery of testosterone to the prostate without reducing serum testosterone levels and therefore tend to have a better side effect profile, although they can cause significant gynaecomastia. Prophylactic radiotherapy to the breast buds or prophylactic tamoxifen 10–20 mg/day can reduce and sometimes prevent the painful gynaecomastia. Typical radiotherapy doses are 8–10 Gy in a single fraction or 15 Gy in three fractions given on alternate days, using electron radiotherapy delivered to an 8–10 cm circle around each nipple.

Metastatic disease, elderly and those with significant comorbidities

Metastatic disease (Figure 12.6) is generally treated with endocrine therapy, usually LHRH analogues in the first instance, with the addition of an anti-androgen to give maximal androgen blockade on biochemical or clinical progression. The typical duration of response to first line endocrine therapy with LHRH analogues is 18–24 months. There is increasing interest in intermittent LHRH analogue therapy as a way of prolonging the useful lifespan of the drug and of allowing patients to have periods of time off treatment and therefore avoid some of the side effects. Typical schedules are to treat until PSA falls below 4 ng/ml (or <80% of initial value) and restart when PSA rises above 10 ng/ml. Studies have shown no difference in survival when compared with continuous therapy, but significant improvements in quality of life, with patients spending a median of 1 year off treatment.

Third line hormonal therapy with oestrogens can be considered but response duration tends to be short unless response to first and second line treatment has been particularly good.

Elderly patients and those with significant co-morbidities can be treated symptomatically with or without hormones.

Cancer of the testes

Investigations and staging

Preoperative investigations should include testicular ultrasound, chest X-ray and tumour markers including alpha-foetoprotein (AFP), beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (beta-HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). One or more tumour marker is raised in 75% of teratomas and 35% of seminomas. If AFP is raised or beta-hCG is >200, then treat as a non-seminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT). Tumour markers should be done preoperatively and repeated a minimum of 7 days after orchiectomy.

Postoperative investigations should include a CT scan of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis for full systemic staging. In case of borderline lymph node size (normal <1 cm), a repeat CT scan after 6 weeks is indicated prior to deciding further management; CT of the brain is indicated if there are multiple lung metastases or beta-HCG levels >10,000 IU/L.

Postoperative tumour markers should be repeated (the half-life of the markers is up to 7 days) and are useful in measuring treatment response and monitoring for recurrence. A bone scan is usually only requested if indicated clinically. Sperm storage should be considered, particularly if chemotherapy is planned.

The staging and risk classification of testicular cancer is shown in Tables 12.5 and 12.6.

Table 12.5 TNM staging of testicular cancer

Stage 0 T1sN0M0 – intracellular germ cell neoplasm
Stage IA pT1N0M0 – tumour limited to testis and epididymis with no LVI or tunica vaginalis invasion (TVI)
Stage IB

Stage IIA Any T, N1 (≤2 cm regional node) M0 Stage IIB Any T, N2 (>2–5 cm) M0 Stage IIC Any T, N3 (>5 cm) M0 node Stage IIIA/B Any T, any N, M1A (non-regional nodes and/or lung metastasis) Stage IIIC

Table 12.6 International Germ Cell Consensus Classification prognostic criteria for non-seminomatous tumours

Good prognosis Intermediate prognosis Poor prognosis
Testis or retroperitoneal primary Testis or retroperitoneal primary Mediastinal primary site
No non-pulmonary visceral metastases No non-pulmonary visceral metastases Non-pulmonary visceral metastases

Postoperative management of seminoma (Figure 12.7)

Stage I disease

Around 80% of patients with seminoma present with stage I disease and survival is >99%. There are two risk factors for recurrence: rete testis invasion and tumour size of >4 cm. 5-year relapse rate is 12% with no risk factors, 16% with one factor and 32% with both factors. Current treatment is active surveillance irrespective of risk factors. If surveillance is not an option the active treatment options are a single dose of carboplatin (AUC7) and para-aortic radiotherapy (20 Gy in 10 fractions) (Box 12.9).

Cancer of the penis

IV

Management

Management of the primary tumour

Invasive disease

Surgery is the treatment of choice and radiotherapy is an alternative. Amputation with good margins has the best long-term outcome with 90% 5-year survival. Radiotherapy has a 30% long-term failure rate. Circumcision should be performed in all patients, even if treated with radiotherapy.