Cancer of the Rectum

Published on 04/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1179 times

Chapter 78

Cancer of the Rectum

Summary of Key Points

Staging and Assessment

• Careful rectal examination yields 67% to 84% accuracy in staging (superficial, mobile, tethered, fixed) and should include pelvic examination for women and prostate examination in men.

• Rigid proctosigmoidoscopy provides the most accurate assessment of distance, size, and position, as well as tethering to surrounding structures.

• Colonoscopy, colonography, or double-contrast barium enema is used to assess for synchronous colon tumors.

• Endorectal ultrasound can assess the depth of invasion and nodal status. Nodal assessment is less reliable.

• Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with endorectal coil and ultrasound are useful to stage rectal cancer and are more sensitive and specific than computed tomography (CT) alone. MRI is used to assess locally advanced or recurrent local disease. CT should be performed on all patients to assess intraabdominal spread. CT or chest x-ray is required to evaluate for synchronous lung metastases.

• The liver is the most frequent site of distant spread, followed by lung, retroperitoneum, ovary, and peritoneal cavity.

• Baseline carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are assessed and followed postoperatively, even if initially normal.

Treatment

• Goals of treatment are cure, local control, and quality of life.

• All retrorectal tumors should be resected, and preoperative biopsy must be avoided.

• Full-thickness local excision is feasible for highly selected patients with T1 mucosal, submucosal, and early invasive cancer, particularly in patients with high-risk comorbidities.

• For T1 to T3 rectal adenocarcinomas, surgical procedures are total mesorectal excision, low anterior resection, low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis with J pouch, and abdominoperineal resection, leaving at least a 2-cm distal margin and clear lateral margins. With surgery, mortality rates are 1% to 7% and morbidity rates are 13% to 46%. The survival rate at 5 years is 74% to 87%.

• Combined therapy cures 50% of N1 patients; 25% of tethered or fixed rectal cancers treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are subsequently resected and cured.

• Of patients who die of rectal cancer, 25% fail with pelvic disease only.

Self-Assessment Questions

1. Imaging features, pros-cons of different strategies. A 68-year-old man presented to his family doctor with rectal bleeding. Physical exam, including a rectal exam were unremarkable. Colonoscopy revealed a mass in the rectum, 9 cm from the anal verge. The mass measured 5 cm and occupied two-thirds of the circumference of the bowel. Remainder of the colonoscopy to the cecum was unremarkable. Biopsy of the mass confirmed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Blood tests revealed a Hgb of 10.8, normal liver function tests, and a carcinoembryonic antigen of 2.1. In planning his treatment, the best next step is:

(See Answer 1)

2. Rectal adenocarcinoma selection for neoadjuvant therapy. A 52-year-old woman on routine gynecologic exam was found to have a palpable mobile rectal mass. Colonoscopy revealed a mass 4 cm from the anal verge, and biopsy revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis revealed no evidence of metastatic disease. Endorectal ultrasound found that the tumor invaded the full thickness of the bowel wall and penetrated into the mesorectal fat posteriorly. Several lymph nodes were seen but were not felt to be suspicious for malignancy. Of the following, the best course of treatment is:

(See Answer 2)

3. Indications and complications of transanal excision. The following are relative contraindications for transanal excision of a malignant polyp less than 3 cm except:

(See Answer 3)

4. Lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer. A 56-year-old man with a low rectal cancer had the PET-CT scan seen below. His workup showed no evidence metastatic disease. Because of these findings on his scan, the following is true:

(See Answer 4)

5. Locally advanced disease—pelvic exenteration. A 76-year-old man presented with pelvic pain, change in bowel habits, and on rectal examination, a bulky low fixed rectal cancer. CT scan showed no evidence of metastatic disease. His pelvic MRI is shown below. All of the following are true except:

(See Answer 5)

6. Metastatic disease with intact primary. A 46-year-old woman presented with a change in bowel habits, although she was eating a regular diet. She had lost 15 pounds, and was using stool softeners. Workup, including a colonoscopy, revealed a midrectal cancer, and a biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma. Her CEA was elevated at 215. CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis showed the primary tumor in the rectum (below) and metastases in the liver. All of the following are true except:

(See Answer 6)

7. Management of the complete response. A 74-year-old woman presented with a 3-cm low rectal cancer. On endorectal ultrasound, the tumor was staged as a T3N0. CT scan of the chest abdomen, and pelvis showed no evidence of metastatic disease. She underwent chemoradiation, with oral capecitabine. Six weeks following completion of radiation therapy she was examined and showed no evidence of disease on rectal examination. Endoscopy showed a scar at the site of the cancer. The patient does not wish to undergo an abdominoperineal resection, and asks you what other options are available. All of the following are true, except:

(See Answer 7)

Answers

1. Answer: B. Treatment depends on the location and stage of the primary tumor (T and N), and presence or absence of metastatic disease (M stage). Metastatic disease is identified by CT scan; PET-CT imaging is not routinely indicated in initial rectal cancer staging. Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and MRI are both very sensitive for the T-stage of the tumor, but MRI is very specific for assessment of the circumferential radial margin (CRM). In contrast, lymph node assessment is poor on both ERUS and MRI.

2. Answer: D. Combined multimodality therapy consisting of surgery, chemoradiation therapy, and an additional 4 months of chemotherapy is recommended for most patients with stage II rectal cancer. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy for stages II/III rectal cancer is associated with a significant reduction in local recurrence and acute toxicity compared with postoperative chemoradiation therapy. Overall survival is similar in both groups. In the randomized studies comparing preoperative and postoperative adjuvant therapy, all patients received two cycles of chemotherapy during radiotherapy and four additional cycles of chemotherapy regardless of the surgical pathology results. The role of close observation in patients who have a clinical complete response is being investigated, but is not standard therapy today.

3. Answer: D. T3 tumors, angiolymphatic invasion, tumors with positive margins, and tumors removed in fragments so that margins cannot be assessed are all contraindications for transanal excision.

4. Answer: D. Low rectal cancers can spread to the lateral lymph nodes. Although controversial, the AJCC defines lateral nodes as regional nodes. However, in Japan, where lateral node dissections are commonly part of the operation, positive lateral side wall nodes, when included in the resection, do not appear to have a significant impact on overall survival or local control. Finding positive nodes in low rectal cancers that extend into the external iliac nodes may have an adverse effect on outcome.

5. Answer: C. For patients with T4 disease, as seen here, with invasion into the bladder wall, risk of locoregional recurrence is high. The risk is associated with the close proximity of the rectum to the pelvic sidewalls and the technical difficulties associated with obtaining clear margins. Initial treatment should be preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

6. Answer: C. Patients who present with stage IV disease should be viewed by the multimodality team as resectable, potentially resectable, or unresectable. If the patient is unresectable (all gross disease removed in an R0 resection), then the goal is palliative. If the patient is resectable initially, it is reasonable to offer immediate resection (either synchronously, or as a staged procedure, depending on patients ability to tolerate the procedures), or an initial short course of chemotherapy prior to surgery. If the patient is not initially resectable, but may be resectable if they have a good response to chemotherapy, then neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be administered, followed by surgery after 2 to 4 months of chemotherapy. If the primary tumor is in the rectum, it is important maximize local control in the pelvis. If the disease presents with a fixed rectal cancer, radiation therapy will improve local control, but not overall survival, and should receive radiation therapy prior to surgery. In this situation, a short course of radiation therapy may be reasonable.

7. Answer: C. Patients with stages II/III cancers who have a pathological complete response have an excellent long-term survival. However, for low rectal cancers, the impact of an APR on overall quality of life is significant, and has resulted in interest in alternative treatments. Unfortunately, endorectal ultrasound and MRI do not accurately stage lymph node status, and for T3 lesions, it is as high as 40% to 50% in several series. Pathological complete response rate from chemoradiation therapy is only 15% to 25%, and so observation alone carries a significant risk of local failure, even if the local excision removes mucosal disease. Ongoing studies in England and South American are examining this issue.

SEE CHAPTER 78 QUESTIONS