173 Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity
Calcium channel blockers (CCBs), also referred to as calcium entry blocking agents or calcium antagonists, are commonly used in the treatment of angina, hypertension, and headache disorders. Their use is complicated by adverse side effects, iatrogenic errors, and intentional overdoses. Significant morbidity and mortality can occur after accidental or intentional poisoning. In 2008, the American Association of Poison Control Centers recorded 10,398 human exposures to CCBs and 60 deaths. As a group, cardiovascular drugs including CCBs were responsible for more than 91,000 human exposures and 238 deaths.1
Pharmacology
CCBs are classified into five groups based on structure or functional activity. The first group, exemplified by the T-channel blocker mibefradil, is unique because these agents antagonize T-type calcium channels. The other four groups all antagonize L-type calcium channels and are divided based on structural differences. These groups include the phenylalkylamines (e.g., verapamil), benzothiazepine (diltiazem), dihydropyridines (e.g., nifedipine and the synthetic agent, clevidipine), and diarylaminopropylamine ether (bepridil). Their mechanism of action involves inhibition of calcium influx through voltage-dependent L-type calcium channels.2,3,4 This inhibition results in decreased intracellular calcium concentration, relaxation of vascular smooth muscle, decreased systemic vascular resistance, and inhibition of intracardiac nodal excitation.3,5 Some CCBs, particularly verapamil, have higher binding affinity for myocardial calcium channels, resulting in sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodal inhibiton.3,6
The most commonly used CCBs (verapamil, diltiazem, and nifedipine) are well absorbed, highly protein bound at therapeutic concentrations, and undergo a variable amount of first-pass metabolism following oral administration.7,8 There is variability in volumes of distribution (Vd). For example, the Vd for verapamil is 5.3 L/kg, whereas the Vd for nifedipine is 0.8 L/kg. These characteristics (high protein binding and large Vd) suggest limited utility of hemodialysis for toxicity. After absorption, CCBs are hepatically metabolized by saturable enzymes to metabolites with variable activity.7,9–11 Therapeutic half-lives range from less than two hours to longer than 60 hours. After massive ingestion or in patients with congestive heart failure or hepatic dysfunction, decreased metabolism leads to increased concentrations of active compounds and prolonged half-lives.12–15 Patients with decreased hepatic perfusion or function may experience decreased elimination of CCBs.10,16
All CCBs are pregnancy category C drugs and have been associated with teratogenic and embryocidal effects in animal studies. After therapeutic use, CCBs can be recovered from breast milk and exposed offspring, but the effects of these drugs on neonates require further investigation.17–20
Clinical Manifestations of Toxicity
The potentially life-threatening effects of CCB intoxication are related to alterations in the function of the cardiovascular system. The most common clinical manifestations are sinus bradycardia, hypotension, and shock. Clinical effects may vary in mild to moderate poisoning, depending on the specific medication. Toxic doses of phenylalkylamines or benzothiazepines commonly cause bradycardia and hypotension secondary to the negative inotropic and chronotropic effects of these drugs.21,22 Toxic doses of dihydropyridines, however, may result in hypotension with reflex tachycardia because of the affinity of these agents for the peripheral vasculature.21,22 In massive overdoses, specificity is lost, and all CCBs can cause bradycardia, depressed cardiac contractility, and cardiovascular collapse.22 Furthermore, cardiovascular compromise may be compounded by ingestion of other cardiovascular toxins, in addition to underlying patient comorbidities. Of note, sustained-release preparations can cause delayed-onset toxicity as late as 12 hours or longer after ingestion.2,21
Pulmonary toxicity from CCB poisoning includes both cardiogenic and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema secondary to several purported mechanisms: negative chronotropy, excessive fluid resuscitation, increased capillary permeability secondary to drug effects, and increased sympathetic discharge in response to shock.23
Neurologic manifestations include myoclonus, dizziness, syncope, focal deficits, and seizures. These neurologic findings are most likely related to central nervous system hypoperfusion.22,24 Gastrointestinal symptoms due to toxic doses of CCBs are nonspecific and include nausea and vomiting.22 CCB toxicity with ensuing shock can cause diffuse organ dysfunction, such as acute kidney injury, secondary to poor tissue perfusion.
Metabolic derangements can include hypokalemia and hyperglycemia. Abnormally high circulating glucose levels are due to calcium channel antagonism in the pancreatic beta islet cells, which inhibits insulin release.25 Metabolic acidosis can be caused by poor tissue perfusion and mitochondrial dehydrogenase inhibition.26
Differential Diagnosis
The most common agents in the differential diagnosis of CCB poisoning are β-adrenergic antagonists, cardiac glycosides, imidazolines, class 1a and 1c antidysrhythmics, cyanide, organophosphates, and late tricyclic antidepressants.22,27 Also included in the differential diagnosis of CCB poisoning are nontoxicologic entities such as acute coronary syndromes, hyperkalemia, myxedema coma, hypothermia, and sepsis.
Diagnostic Testing
The diagnosis of CCB poisoning is based predominately on history and physical examination. Both routine and comprehensive drug screening assays routinely miss CCBs.28 Although there are no specific laboratory tests available to diagnose CCB poisoning, some laboratory studies should be obtained to aid clinical management.
Treatment
Gastric decontamination plays a limited role in the vast majority of acute poisonings, including CCB poisoning. A single dose of activated charcoal, without a cathartic, may be administered within one hour after ingestion if the patient is willing to drink. Insertion of a nasogastric tube solely for the purpose of charcoal administration is not recommended.29 Whole-bowel irrigation also has been used following the ingestion of sustained-release CCBs but is not routinely indicated.30,31
Intravenous (IV) fluids should be administered to hypotensive patients to improve blood pressure and tissue perfusion. In adults, 2 L of lactated Ringer’s or normal saline solution should be given. Care should be maintained not to administer excessive volumes of crystalloid solutions to patients poisoned by CCBs because of the risk of pulmonary edema.23
Atropine has limited utility in reversing bradycardia, but it may be administered on an emergency basis while other therapies are being prepared.22,32
External or internal pacemaker therapy may be attempted to ameliorate symptomatic bradycardia. If capture is achieved, the heart rate should be set at 60 bpm. The target systolic blood pressure should be 90 to 100 mm Hg in order to ensure adequate tissue perfusion. However, pacemaker therapy is often ineffective in sustaining hemodynamic improvement.22,32
Administration of parenteral calcium salts may occasionally augment heart rate and blood pressure in the face of CCB poisoning.32 Calcium chloride contains approximately three times the amount of calcium as the gluconate salt and is the preferred agent.33 Slow boluses of one to three g of calcium chloride may be given, and a continuous infusion of two to six g/h may be initiated if a response is noted.34,35 Serum ionized calcium levels should be monitored during parenteral calcium infusions and maintained at approximately 2 to 3 mmol/L.22,33 If digoxin toxicity is suspected, use of parenteral calcium salts should be avoided; use of digoxin antibodies should be considered.22
Although more commonly associated with β-adrenergic antagonist poisoning, IV glucagon may offer another treatment modality. Intravenous glucagon activates adenyl cyclase, leading to increased intracellular levels of the second messenger, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). In cardiac myocytes, increased levels of cAMP lead to improvements in cardiac contractility and rate.21,36 Intravenous boluses of glucagon (2-10 mg) may be administered; if hemodynamics improve, glucagon should be infused at the effective IV mg dose per hour. Side effects of glucagon administration include nausea, vomiting, and hyperglycemia.22,37
Four novel therapies for CCB toxicity are insulin/dextrose infusion, hypertonic saline, 4-aminopyridine, and lipid emulsion. The use of an insulin/dextrose infusion (high insulin–euglycemia treatment [HIE] therapy) may correct the state of hypoinsulinemia and impaired cellular glucose uptake found in CCB poisoning.25 The underlying mechanism of HIE may involve altered myocardial metabolism. Under normal physiologic conditions, the heart preferentially utilizes fatty acids for energy production. However, when drug-induced cardiac dysfunction is present, carbohydrates are used for myocardial energy requirements.38,39 Despite a lack of concensus, a reasonable starting regimen can be found in Table 173-1. Potassium and glucose concentrations should be monitored closely; blood glucose levels and hemodynamic response will dictate changes in insulin or glucose administration.3,40,41 Although animal data and human case reports describing the use of HIE are increasing, it is not recommended as a first-line agent.26,41–45
TABLE 173-1 Pharmaceutical Interventions After Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity
Drug | Dose | Goal |
---|---|---|
Activated charcoal | 1-2 g/kg orally (max. 100 g) | Decreased systemic absorption (give within 1 hour after ingestion) |
Whole-bowel irrigation | 500-2000 mL/h until clear rectal effluent | Decreased system absorption (use after contacting a poison control center) |
IV fluids | 2 L of NS or lactated Ringer’s solution | Correct dehydration; increased BP and perfusion |
Calcium chloride | 1 ampule IV over 2 min | Increased HR and SVR |
Atropine | 0.5-1 mg IV every 3 min (max. 3 mg) | Increased HR and CO |
Glucagon | 5-10 mg bolus, then 2-10 mg/h infusion | Titrate for increased SVR |
Isoproterenol | Initiate at 2 mg/min | Titrate for increased CO |
Epinephrine | Initiate at 2 µg/min | Titrate for increased SVR |
Norepinephrine | Initiate at 0.5 mg/min | Titrate for increased SVR |
Insulin (euglycemia) | 1 unit/kg regular insulin IV bolus, then 0.5-1 unit/kg/h. Co-administer 25 g of dextrose if blood glucose is <200 mg/dL. | Titrate for increased CO; closely monitor blood glucose and potassium levels. |
Lipid fat emulsion | 1-1.5 mL/kg (20% lipid emulsion) IV over 2 min. Can repeat if no effect in 5 min. If effective, start a drip at 0.25 mL/kg/min for 60 min. | Recovery of cardiac output |
Ventricular pacing | Achieve ventricular capture at 50-60 bpm | Increased HR and CO |
Intraaortic balloon pump | Consult cardiologist | Refractory to all other interventions |
Cardiopulmonary bypass | Consult cardiothoracic surgeon | Refractory to all other interventions |
BP, blood pressure; CO, cardiac output; HR, heart rate; IV, intravenous; SVR, systemic vascular resistance.
Hypertonic saline has been studied only in animals as a potential treatment for verapamil poisoning. The proposed mechanism involves increasing the pH around the calcium channel and reversing potential verapamil-induced sodium channel blockade.46 The drug 4-aminopyridine blocks the outward rectifying potassium channel, allowing more calcium to enter the myocardial cell.22 This drug has demonstrated success in animal models and in a single verapamil-poisoned patient receiving hemodialysis.47
Lipid emulsion (Intralipid) infusion has been used for the treatment of several lipophilic drug-induced toxicities, including verapamil.48–51 The mechanism of action involves the IV administration of lipids (fat emulsion) that reduce the Vd of lipophilic drugs (e.g., verapamil). By serving as a “sink” for lipophilic drugs, these lipid microspheres bind to intravascular drug and keep it from reaching target tissues. This mechanism suggests that the optimal effect would occur if the lipids are administered very soon after the exposure when a large percentage of the drug is still in the intravascular space.
Treatment endpoints are maintenance of oxygenation, heart rate, and blood pressure to sustain adequate tissue perfusion. Continuous monitoring of hemodynamic parameters, mentation, urine output, and acid-base status are paramount and will help guide effective therapy. Patients who remain in a state of cardiovascular collapse despite aggressive resuscitation may be candidates for extracorporeal blood pressure support using cardiopulmonary bypass or intraaortic balloon pump.21,52
Table 173-1 presents a summary of pharmaceutical interventions after CCB toxicity.
Conclusions
CCBs hold the potential for causing severe or delayed hemodynamic instability. Appropriate evaluation and monitoring of asymptomatic patients, as well as aggressive interventions in those patients with cardiovascular collapse, ensures optimal patient outcomes. Clinicians should initiate catecholamine infusions early in hypotensive patients who fail to respond to moderate fluid resuscitation. Consultation with a regional poison control center (telephone 800-222-1222 in the United States or find online at www.eapect.org in Europe) or a medical toxicologist can offer insights into underlying pathophysiology and assistance with patient management.
Key Points
Albertson TE, Dawson A, Latorre F, et al. TOX-ACLS: toxicologic-oriented advanced cardiac life support. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:S78-S90.
Kerns W. Management of β-adrenergic blocker and calcium channel antagonist toxicity. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007;25:309-331.
Salhanick SD, Shannon MW. Management of calcium channel antagonist overdose. Drug Saf. 2003;26:65-79.
Lheureux P, Zahor S, Gris M, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy in the management of overdose of calcium-channel blockers. Crit Care. 2006;10:212.
Jamaty C, Bailey B, Larocque A, et al. Lipid emulsions in the treatment of acute poisoning: a systematic review of the human and animal studies. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010;48:1-27.
1 Bronstein AC, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR, et al. 2008 Annual reports of the American association of poison control centers toxic exposure surveillance system. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009;47(10):911-1084.
2 Katz AM, Hager WD, Messineo FC, et al. Cellular actions and pharmacology of calcium-channel blockers. Am J Emerg Med. 1985;3(Suppl 6):1-9.
3 Salhanick SD, Shannon MW. Management of calcium channel antagonist overdose. Drug Saf. 2003;26(2):65-79.
4 Kenyon KW. Clevidipine: an ultra short-acting calcium channel antagonist for acute hypertension. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:1258-1264.
5 Low RI, Takeda P, Mason DT, et al. The effects of calcium channel blocking agents on cardiovascular function. Am J Cardiol. 1982;49:547-553.
6 Kawai C, Konishi T, Matsuyama E, et al. Comparative effects of three calcium antagonists, diltiazem, verapamil and nifedipine, on the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes. Circulation. 1981;63:1035-1042.
7 Foster TS, Hamann SR, Richards VR, et al. Nifedipine kinetics and bioavailability after single intravenous and oral doses in normal subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;23:161-170.
8 Scholz H. Pharmacological aspects of calcium channel blockers. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1997;10(Suppl 3):869-872.
9 Keefe DL, Yee YG, Kates RE. Verapamil protein binding in patients and in normal subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982;29:21-26.
10 McAllister RG, Hamann SR, Blouin RA. Pharmacokinetics of calcium-entry blockers. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:30B-40B.
11 Johnson KE, Balderston SM, Pieper JA, et al. Electrophysiologic effects of verapamil metabolites in the isolated heart. J Cardiovasc Pharm. 1991;17:830-837.
12 Buckley CD, Aronson JK. Prolonged half-life of verapamil in a case of overdose: Implications for therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;39:680-683.
13 Ferner RE, Monkman S, Riley J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and toxic effects of nifedipine in massive overdose. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1990;9(5):309-311.
14 Ferner RE, Odemuyiwa O, Field AB, et al. Pharmacology and toxic effects of diltiazem in massive overdose. Hum Toxicol. 1989;8:497-499.
15 Roberts D, Honcharik N, Sitar DS, et al. Diltiazem overdose: Pharmacokinetics of diltiazem and its metabolites and effect of multiple dose charcoal therapy. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1991;29:45-52.
16 Woodcock BG, Rietbrock I, Vohringer HF, et al. Verapamil disposition in liver disease and intensive-care patients: Kinetics, clearance, and apparent blood flow relationships. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;29:27-34.
17 Miller MR, Withers R, Bhamra R, et al. Verapamil and breast-feeding. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;30:125-126.
18 Okada M, Inoue H, Nakamura Y, et al. Excretion of diltiazem in human milk. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:992-993.
19 Manninen AK, Juhakoski A. Nifedipine concentrations in maternal and umbilical serum, amniotic fluid, breast milk and urine of mothers and offspring. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1991;11:231-236.
20 Beardmore KS, Morris JM, Gallery ED. Excretion of antihypertensive medications into human breast milk: A systematic review. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2002;21:85-95.
21 Proano L, Chiang WK, Wang RY. Calcium channel blocker overdose. Am J Emerg Med. 1995;13:444-450.
22 Kerns W, Kline J, Ford MD. B-blocker and calcium channel blocker toxicity. Emerg Med Clin. 1994;12:365-390.
23 Brass BJ, Winchester-Penny S, Lipper BL. Massive verapamil overdose complicated by noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:459-461.
24 Vadlamudi L, Wijdicks EFM. Multifocal myoclonus due to verapamil overdose. Neurology. 2002;58:984-985.
25 Boyer EW, Shannon M. Treatment of calcium channel-blocker intoxication with insulin infusion. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1721-1722.
26 Yuan TH, Kerns WP, Tomaszewski CA, et al. Insulin-glucose as adjunctive therapy for severe calcium channel antagonist poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1999;37:463-474.
27 Brady WJ, Harrigan RA. Evaluation and management of bradyarrhythmias in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin. 1998;16:361-388.
28 Wiley JF. Difficult diagnoses in toxicology: Poisons not detected by the comprehensive drug screen. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1991;38:725-737.
29 Chyka PA, Seger D. Position statement: Single-dose activated charcoal. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35:721-741.
30 Tenenbein M. Position statement: Whole bowel irrigation. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35:753-762.
31 Buckley N. Slow-release verapamil poisoning: Use of polyethylene glycol whole bowel lavage and high dose calcium. Med J Aust. 1993;158:202-204.
32 Ramoska EA, Spiller HA, Winter M, Borys D. A one-year evaluation of calcium channel blocker overdoses: Toxicity and treatment. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:196-200.
33 Lam YM, Tse HF, Lau CP. Continuous calcium chloride infusion for massive nifedipine overdose. Chest. 2001;119:1280-1282.
34 Albertson TE, Dawson A, Latorre F, et al. TOX-ACLS: Toxicologic-oriented advanced cardiac life support. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;37:S78-S90.
35 Haddad LM. Resuscitation after nifedipine overdose exclusively with intravenous calcium chloride. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:602-605.
36 Stone CK, May WA, Carroll R. Treatment of verapamil overdose with glucagon in dogs. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:369-374.
37 Thomas SH, Stone CK, May WA. Exacerbation of verapamil-induced hyperglycemia with glucagon. Am J Emerg Med. 1995;13:27-29.
38 Kline JA, Leonova E, Raymond RM. Beneficial myocardial metabolic effects of insulin during verapamil toxicity in the anesthetized canine. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(7):1251-1263.
39 Kline JA, Raymond RM, Leonova E, et al. Insulin improves heart function and metabolism during non-ischemia cardiogenic shock in awake canines. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;34:289-298.
40 Kerns W. Management of β-adrenergic blocker and calcium channel antagonist toxicity. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007;25:309-331.
41 Lheureux P, Zahor S, Gris M, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy in the management of overdose of calcium-channel blockers. Crit Care. 2006;10(3):212.
42 Shepherd G, Klein-Schwartz W. High-dose insulin therapy for calcium channel blocker overdose. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:923-930.
43 Boyer EW, Duic PA, Evans A. Hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy for calcium channel blocker poisoning. Ped Emerg Care. 2002;18(1):36-37.
44 Azendour H, Belyamani L, Atmani M, et al. Severe amlodipine intoxication treated by hyperinsulinemia euglycemia therapy. J Emerg Med. 2010;38(1):33-35.
45 Patel NP, Pugh ME, Goldberg S, et al. Hyperinsulinemia euglycemia therapy for verapamil poisoning. Am J Crit Care. 2007;16:498-503.
46 Tanen DA, Ruha AM, Curry SC, et al. Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate is effective in the acute management of verapamil toxicity in a swine model. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36:547-553.
47 Ter Wee PM, Kremer Hovinga TK, Uges DR, van der Geest S. 4-Aminopyridine and haemodialysis in the treatment of verapamil intoxication. Hum Toxicol. 1985;4:327-329.
48 Tebbutt S, Harvey M, Nocholson T, et al. Intralipid prolongs survival in a rat model of verapamil toxicity. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:134-139.
49 Bania TC, Chu J, Perez E, et al. Hemodynamic effects of intravenous fat emulsion in an animal model of severe verapamil toxicity resuscitated with atropine, calcium and normal saline. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:105-111.
50 Perez E, Bania TC, Medleg K, et al. Determining the optimal dose of intravenous fat emulsion for the treatment of severe verapamil toxicity in a rodent model. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(12):1284-1289.
51 Jamaty C, Bailey B, Larocque A, et al. Lipid emulsion in the treatment of acute poisoning: a systemic review of the human and animal studies. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010;48:1-27.
52 Holzer M, Sterz F, Schoerkhuber W, et al. Successful resuscitation of a verapamil-intoxicated patient with percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:2818-2823.