Bronchoscopic Removal of a Broncholith from the Lateral Wall of the Proximal Bronchus Intermedius

Published on 23/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3649 times

Chapter 4 Bronchoscopic Removal of a Broncholith from the Lateral Wall of the Proximal Bronchus Intermedius

image

This chapter emphasizes the following elements of the Four Box Approach: anatomic dangers and other risks, and results and procedure-related complications.

Case Description

An 82-year-old woman presented with a 2 year history of chronic dry cough. She was treated empirically with antihistamines/decongestants, bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids, and proton pump inhibitors for post nasal drip syndrome, asthma, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but her cough did not subside. No clinical evidence of aspiration or dysphagia was noted. The cough significantly affected her quality of life because she had developed urinary incontinence and recurrent syncope with severe coughing. She had no other complaints. She lived alone, and at the time of our encounter, she was accompanied by a friend. Physical examination and vital signs were normal. She had diabetes mellitus well controlled with once-daily long-acting insulin and was on no other medications. She had been exposed to tuberculosis when she was young, but she was never diagnosed or treated for active disease. Cardiac workup included dobutamine stress echocardiography, which was normal. Chest radiography and pulmonary function tests were normal. Videofluoroscopic swallow evaluation, 24 hour pH monitoring, and sinus computed tomography (CT) were normal. Noncontrast chest CT performed by her physician showed a calcified lymph node in the right hilum (Figure 4-1). Bronchoscopy revealed a hard, white-yellowish exophytic endobronchial lesion protruding from the lateral wall of the proximal bronchus intermedius (see Figure 4-1).

Case Resolution

Initial Evaluations

Physical Examination, Complementary Tests, and Functional Status Assessment

The diagnosis of broncholithiasis was made after 2 years of unsuccessful treatment for the most common causes of chronic cough. High intrathoracic pressures (up to 300 mm Hg) and velocities (up to 500 miles/hr) make cough an effective means of clearing the airways of excessive secretions and foreign material; however, these physiologic changes can cause a variety of profound physically and psychosocially adverse occurrences that may lead to a significant decrease in health-related quality of life (HRQL).1 The spectrum of complications secondary to chronic cough is broad and includes cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, neurologic, ophthalmologic, psychosocial, and respiratory conditions, as well as reduced HRQL; our patient had already experienced loss of consciousness and urinary incontinence. Results of studies show that women with chronic cough are more inclined to seek medical attention than men because their HRQL is significantly more adversely affected, and because they are more likely to experience physical problems such as stress urinary incontinence.2 It is important to exhaust all diagnostic and therapeutic modalities to eliminate cough, if possible, and to not minimize a patient’s complaints.

Our patient underwent a thorough diagnostic evaluation for chronic cough* in accordance with American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines.3 She had no evidence of upper airway cough syndrome (aka post nasal drip syndrome), and she did not respond to empirical treatment with antihistamines and decongestants. No clinical or physiologic testing evidence or response to empirical therapy for asthma or GERD was noted. Many clinicians reserve bronchoscopy for patients with chronic cough and suspected lung cancer (based on age and smoking history) even when the chest x-ray is normal. Although bronchoscopy as a primary diagnostic modality is infrequently diagnostic in patients with chronic cough, it may detect laryngeal and tracheobronchial pathology, including broncholithiasis. In our patient, bronchoscopy was performed because the cough persisted after consideration of the most common causes, and because the CT scan suggested possible broncholithiasis, presenting as a high attenuation lesion; the differential diagnosis of such lesions seen on CT can be narrowed by carefully obtaining a patient history and evaluating other CT findings. In cases of broncholithiasis due to erosion by calcified peribronchial lymph nodes, CT usually shows lymph nodes with or without calcification at other locations and parenchymal changes due to previous infection. Our patient, however, had no such findings. Sometimes calcified peribronchial lymph nodes that do not erode into the bronchial lumen may mimic broncholithiasis. In these situations, diagnosis can be confirmed bronchoscopically. In fact, one study showed that bronchoscopy was diagnostic in 7 of 20 (35%) chronic cough patients with unremarkable chest x-ray and without pulmonary or extrapulmonary cancer.4 Two of these seven patients (28%) had broncholithiasis. Although chest CT may be diagnostic, it rarely obviates the need for confirmatory bronchoscopy, especially if therapy is planned.

Although it is not a common cause of cough, studies show that patients with broncholithiasis most frequently present with chronic cough (67% of patients) followed by hemoptysis (38% to 66%), lithoptysis (13% to 19%), fever with sputum production (6% to 15%), dyspnea (15%), wheezing (11% to 15%), and chest pain (4%).5 It is thought that repeated physical impingement of calcified peribronchial lymph nodes on the bronchial wall during respiratory motion is responsible for broncholith formation. When calcified lymph nodes compress or invade the bronchial lumen, changing the bronchial lumen shape, irritating the mucous membrane, and eroding the luminal wall, the previously mentioned clinical manifestations occur, which may lead to recurrent pneumonia or fistulas to the esophagus or the bronchial or even pulmonary artery.6

Our patient likely developed broncholithiasis after a pulmonary fungal infection or tuberculosis, even though the lung parenchyma showed no sequelae of prior lung disease. Some cases may be caused by histoplasmosis or by inflammatory stimuli such as silicosis and foreign bodies.7 Although the most common sequelae of histoplasmosis are asymptomatic pulmonary calcifications and calcified lymph nodes, for which no intervention is warranted, progressive complications such as pulmonary and mediastinal granulomatous disease, fibrosing mediastinitis, and broncholithiasis can occur. One study reported broncholithiasis in 27% (13/49) of patients with histoplasmosis-related complications.8 Our patient had no other radiographic findings suggesting histoplasmosis such as calcified lung nodules or splenic granulomas. Consistent with results from published studies, our patient’s broncholith was on the right side. Sites of predilection for broncholithiasis are on the right side owing to the greater number of pulmonary lymph nodes.9 Some studies report that the bifurcation of the right middle lobe and right lower lobe and the bifurcation of the anterior segment of the left upper lobe and the lingular bronchus were also sites of predilection for broncholithiasis, because the bronchi form an acute angle and the bifurcation has no cartilage rings, making it easy for calcified lymph nodes to penetrate into the bronchial lumen.

When combined, CT scanning and bronchoscopy can clearly determine the type of broncholithiasis: intraluminal (free broncholiths) or penetrating (partially eroding broncholiths). This classification is not just of academic interest in that the type of broncholith identified guides management. Intraluminal broncholiths can lead to distal obstructive inflammation, and bronchial lumina might be obstructed by granulation tissues caused by broncholith-induced long-term airway irritation; these may be extracted by flexible or rigid bronchoscopy.9 Penetrating broncholiths can cause damage to blood vessels and hemoptysis, sometimes even in death. For these patients, although bronchoscopy can be considered in cases of persistent hemoptysis combined with fistulas of trachea, bronchus, or esophagus, or severe secondary pulmonary infection, thoracotomy may be warranted.5,10 On the basis of CT scan and bronchoscopy, our patient was diagnosed as having a penetrating broncholith with none of the already mentioned complications.

Comorbidities

This patient had diabetes mellitus. Interventions provided under general anesthesia can significantly increase risks for perioperative complications. Careful assessment of diabetic patients before surgery is required because of their high risk of coronary heart disease, which may be relatively asymptomatic compared with the nondiabetic population. Diabetes mellitus is also associated with increased risk of perioperative infection and postoperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.11,12 Although the risk of surgical wound infection is real should thoracotomy be required, cardiac ischemia becomes unlikely in the presence of a negative dobutamine stress echocardiography. No evidence of other diabetes-associated conditions, such as hypertension, chronic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, and autonomic neuropathy, was noted; these conditions can complicate anesthesia and postoperative care.

Support System

The patient’s age and diabetes mellitus status put her at risk for what is known as geriatric syndrome, which comprises functional disabilities, depression, falls, urinary incontinence, malnutrition, and cognitive impairment. Geriatric syndrome leads to frailty, loss of independence, and low quality of life.13 This patient had no immediate family, but she was close to her friend, who was very supportive. In fact, although she was independent in activities of daily living and did not lack decision-making capacity, she did have an advance directive in the form of durable power of attorney for health care, identifying her friend as the surrogate decision maker for health care in case she lost decision-making capacity.

Patient Preferences and Expectations

Clinicians are not always obligated to grant requests for interventions that are clearly ineffective or that violate their conscience.14 This patient was able to clearly express her desire for treatment and wanted her cough to improve so she could live a decent life. Her expectations were considered reasonable, and we decided to honor her request because it was within the standard of care. Her friend was involved in these conversations, and both agreed to proceed with available therapeutic options for broncholithiasis.

Procedural Strategies

Indications

A bronchoscopic procedure could be offered to remove the broncholith (broncholithectomy) and improve her disabling cough. Several treatment modalities have been shown to improve symptoms or manage complications related to broncholithiasis. Treatment ranges from nonoperative management (simple observation) to bronchoscopic broncholithectomy and even thoracotomy for patients in whom severe complications develop. Removal of the broncholith in this patient could prevent the development of hemoptysis, atelectasis, post obstructive pneumonia, bronchiectasis, and even bronchoarterial or bronchoesophageal fistulas.15 Furthermore, removal of the broncholith and its histologic evaluation would exclude alternative diagnoses that could be associated with or mimic broncholithiasis. For instance, primary endobronchial infection with dystrophic calcification (i.e., calcifications of fungus balls within ectatic bronchi), hypertrophied bronchial arteries with intramural protrusion, calcified endobronchial tumors, and tracheobronchial disease with mural calcification (i.e., tracheopathica osteochondroplastica) all can mimic broncholithiasis.16

Expected Results

The objective of the procedure was to remove the endobronchial component of the calcified lymph node without perforating the airway wall and causing hemorrhage. We intended to leave one piece of broncholith embedded in the bronchial wall intact, if necessary, thus avoiding potential bleeding from the immediately adjacent pulmonary artery. Rigid bronchoscopic intubation was planned using a 12 mm diameter Efer-Dumon ventilating rigid bronchoscope (Efer Broncho, Marseilles, France); this scope allows passage of laser fiber, rigid suction catheter, and forceps, and because of the side-holes at its distal aspect, ventilation to the contralateral left lung would be possible while working in the right bronchial tree. Nd:YAG laser would be available should photocoagulation be needed at the area of insertion in the bronchial wall, coagulation of associated granulation tissue, or bleeding. Lasers (Nd:YAG, pulsed-dye, and holmium-yttrium aluminum garnet [Ho:YAG]) were reported to be useful for fragmenting an eroding broncholith that could not be dislodged with a rigid or a flexible bronchoscope, or for fragmenting a mobile broncholith that was too hard to be broken with the biopsy forceps and too large to be pulled through the upper airway.2426 Several reports describing use of the laser were limited to removing associated granulation tissue, not the broncholith per se.27 Others used laser to shatter the broncholith when a significant part of the broncholith protruded into the lumen.27 The shattering effect described in the literature can be achieved by applying high laser power (80 to 100 W) to the smallest surface area (high-power density) and very short pulses (0.2 to 0.3 second) interspaced by rest periods (2 to 5 seconds) to avoid overheating of the broncholith and the possible resulting popcorn* effect in adjacent tissues.

Success rates as high as 87% for bronchoscopic removal of broncholiths, without life-threatening complications, have been reported.28,29 The outcome of bronchoscopy depends, however, on the type of broncholithiasis. Several surgical series have reported different outcomes of bronchoscopic broncholithectomy. Among 63 patients studied by Arrigoni et al., broncholiths were removed bronchoscopically from 40 patients (63%) whose bronchoscopies revealed visible broncholiths. The authors concluded that bronchoscopic extraction of a visualized broncholith was “reasonable” as long as irreversible distal bronchial and parenchymal damage had not occurred.30 Based on their successful bronchoscopic removal of intraluminal broncholiths from eight patients without severe bleeding, Cole et al. likewise concluded that bronchoscopic broncholithectomy was a “useful adjunct” and should be thoughtfully attempted before complications of broncholithiasis occur.29 Trastek et al. achieved complete bronchoscopic broncholith removal in 8 of 12 patients (66.7%) who underwent bronchoscopic extraction. Broncholithiasis recurred in three of these eight patients, for which one underwent repeat bronchoscopic broncholithectomy, one required right middle lobectomy, and one refused further intervention and died of massive hemoptysis. Three of four patients who underwent unsuccessful bronchoscopic removal attempts went on to surgery.31 The authors concluded that bronchoscopic broncholithectomy “should probably be reserved for patients who are in poor medical condition.” In an older case series, Faber et al. reported bronchoscopic removal in only 2 of 33 patients studied.32 The authors concluded that bronchoscopic broncholith removal was indicated only if the broncholith was “loose and mobile” and extraction did “not require extensive manipulation.”

In one of the largest published studies, bronchoscopic removal of 71 broncholiths (56% of total identified) was attempted in 48 patients (50.5%) during 61 bronchoscopy sessions. Forty-eight of the broncholiths selected for removal were partially eroding into the tracheobronchial lumen, and 23 were free. Forty-eight percent (23 of 48) of the partially eroding broncholiths were successfully removed bronchoscopically; a greater percentage of broncholiths were removed with the rigid bronchoscope (67%) than with the flexible bronchoscope (30%). All free broncholiths were completely extracted regardless of the type of bronchoscope used. Complications occurred in only two patients (4% of the bronchoscopic removal group), both with partially eroding broncholiths, and consisted of hemorrhage in one patient requiring thoracotomy and acute dyspnea in another patient, caused by a loose broncholith lodged in the trachea.5

Team Experience

Flexible and rigid bronchoscopic extractions of broncholiths are considered safe and effective.5 However, when rigid bronchoscopy is performed, the operator needs to be skilled in gently manipulating the scope inside the airway during the broncholithectomy process to avoid airway wall perforation. Furthermore, because concern for hemorrhage is real in this type of broncholithiasis, the team needs to be ready to respond in case of massive intraoperative hemoptysis. This procedure should not be performed in a facility that does not have the necessary equipment to safely manage a patient’s hemoptysis.

Risk-Benefit Analysis

Our patient had symptoms that significantly interfered with her quality of life and warranted intervention. No risk-benefit analysis has been performed to compare rigid bronchoscopy with other types of bronchoscopic treatment modalities. Also, no direct comparison studies have been conducted to evaluate bronchoscopy (rigid or flexible) versus thoracotomy. Results of retrospective studies show that a higher frequency of hemoptysis (66% vs. 38%) was seen in the group that did not undergo an attempt at bronchoscopic broncholith removal. Indeed, bleeding at initial bronchoscopic inspection and a firmly embedded broncholith seem to be the most common reasons for not attempting bronchoscopic removal and proceeding with thoracotomy. From the published literature, it is difficult to retrospectively interpret how bronchoscopists decided whether to attempt bronchoscopic removal, how vigorous the extraction efforts were, and why attempts were aborted.5

Selection of treatment depends on broncholith size, location, and proximity to the pulmonary artery on the chest CT scan, as well as the patient’s symptoms. Similar characteristics of most patients who undergo successful endoscopic removal include a broncholith that is not fixed in the airway (or at least is partially mobile on bronchoscopic probing), is small enough to be removed endoscopically, is proximal enough in the airway to facilitate removal, and is not contiguous with the pulmonary artery on the CT scan. If a broncholith is contiguous with the pulmonary artery, aggressive manipulation is dangerous, and thoracotomy should be considered instead.

Therapeutic Alternatives for Broncholith Removal

Observation: Spontaneous broncholith expectoration (lithoptysis) may occasionally lead to resolution of symptoms, but overall, several studies show that this is rare. The 3 year natural history of asymptomatic patients with broncholithiasis appears to be benign (no progression of disease, either radiologically or by development of symptoms). The nodes do not necessarily rub their way into the airway, cause a fistula between mediastinal structures, or lead to superior vena cava syndrome. This suggests that patients can be followed yearly or perhaps even less stringently with CT scans. Intervention (bronchoscopy or thoracotomy) might not be warranted unless patients become symptomatic. These recommendations pertain to patients without active inflammatory disease and are reserved for those with asymptomatic burnt-out calcified nodal disease.9 Our patient was symptomatic for 2 years, and simple observation was declined.

Flexible bronchoscopic extraction: This approach seems just as efficacious as rigid bronchoscopy for free broncholiths (100% success rate). For penetrating broncholiths, however, it appears to be less effective than rigid bronchoscopy; a greater percentage of broncholiths are removed with the rigid bronchoscope (67%) than with the flexible bronchoscope (30%).5 Flexible techniques are similar to foreign body extraction and utilize balloon catheters, forceps, and baskets. Complications include central airway obstruction due to loss of the broncholith during extraction, hemoptysis, and, rarely, death.3335

Holmium:YAG laser: This technique is often used in urology for stone removal, resection or vaporization of prostatic tissue, and treatment of urethral strictures; it has also been used to fragment broncholiths obstructing segmental and central airways. With a wavelength of 2010 nm, well into the infrared spectra, laser energy in part is absorbed by water contained within the stones, causing expansion and fragmentation in a process termed microexplosion.36 The temperature rise in proximity to the laser tip appears to cause a chemical breakdown of the stone, resulting in weakening of the stone and allowing fragmentation without appreciable collateral mechanical or thermal damage. Application of the Ho:YAG laser directly to tissue will cause injury with a penetration depth of approximately 0.4 mm; this might provide some safety margin over the more familiar Nd:YAG laser with a depth of penetration up to 6 mm. The relatively low-energy photothermal effect of the Ho:YAG laser is well suited to destruction of stones in the bronchial tree. Small fragments resulting from laser-induced shattering can be irrigated and suctioned from the airway; larger fragments can be removed with baskets or forceps. The photothermal effect of the Ho:YAG slowly causes disintegration of the stone from within, resulting in smaller fragments and more controlled breakage.

Pulsed-dye laser: This type of laser fragments calculi through a photoacoustic effect. Theoretically, the photoacoustic wave energy of pulsed-dye lasers could propel the stone farther into the airway, potentially causing mechanical collateral damage.

Cryotherapy: This treatment is reported to be successful for partially attached broncholiths for which simple forceps extraction has failed.37 Cryotherapy has been used for the removal of foreign objects, blood clots, granulation tissue, and mucous plugs, as well as for the management of endobronchial obstruction.38 Advantages of cryotherapy include ease of use, lower cost compared with laser therapies, and reusability of the cryoprobe after disinfection. Complications include bleeding and airway perforation, especially when intervention includes manipulation of the broncholith stalk.

Thoracotomy: This approach was proposed by clinicians who were concerned about the potential for significant hemorrhage, bronchial tears, or fistula formation when bronchoscopic extraction of broncholiths is attempted. To avoid such complications, on the basis of limited experience, some groups recommend that bronchoscopic removal be completely avoided39 or limited to patients whose comorbidities preclude surgical intervention.31 Thoracotomy is also offered when bronchoscopy (rigid and/or flexible) is unsuccessful. Types of surgeries depend on the location of the broncholith and the functionality of the distal lung parenchyma and include broncholithectomy, segmentectomy, lobectomy, bilobectomy, and even pneumonectomy.5 Complications such as bleeding, fistula, and infection have been reported in 9% to 47% of cases, and death in 0% to 3% of cases. Long-term results usually are excellent with no reported recurrence in 68% to 100% of cases.40 Most surgeries for broncholithiasis involve pulmonary resection; 80% to 95% of patients require segmentectomy or more extensive resection. Results of several surgical studies for broncholithiasis are summarized in Table 4-1. A review of these reports reveals several common themes. First, usual indications for surgery for broncholithiasis include chronic pulmonary suppurative disease (bronchiectasis), massive hemoptysis, bronchoesophageal fistula, and uncertainty about the diagnosis. Second, the mediastinal and hilar fibrocalcific reactions accompanying broncholithiasis can alter tissue planes, obscure anatomic landmarks, and increase blood vessel fragility in the operative field, making surgical dissection difficult and increasing the risk of complications. Third, long-term results of surgery are usually excellent (see Table 4-1).

Techniques and Results

Anesthesia and Perioperative Care

Surgery and general anesthesia cause a neuroendocrine stress response resulting in metabolic abnormalities that include insulin resistance, decreased peripheral glucose utilization, impaired insulin secretion, and increased lipolysis and protein catabolism; these may lead to hyperglycemia and even to ketosis in the perioperative period.41 The hyperglycemic response to these factors may be attenuated by lack of caloric intake during and immediately after surgery (i.e., including NPO orders), making the final glycemic balance difficult to predict. Goals of perioperative diabetic management include maintenance of fluid and electrolyte balance, prevention of ketoacidosis, avoidance of marked hyperglycemia, and avoidance of hypoglycemia. Patients with type 2 diabetes, as is seen in our patient, are susceptible to developing a nonketotic hyperosmolar state (NKH), which may lead to severe volume depletion and neurologic complications; they may also develop ketoacidosis in the setting of extreme stress. Hypoglycemia is another potentially life-threatening complication of poor perioperative metabolic control.

Even a few minutes of severe hypoglycemia (i.e., serum glucose concentration <40 mg/dL) can be harmful, possibly inducing arrhythmias and cognitive deficits. Hypoglycemia and subsequent neuroglucopenia can be difficult to detect in anesthetized or sedated patients. Ideally, all patients with diabetes mellitus should undergo surgery as early as possible in the morning to minimize disruption of their management routine while they are NPO. Generally, patients who use insulin (type 1 and insulin-dependent type 2) can continue with subcutaneous insulin (rather than an insulin infusion) perioperatively for procedures that are not long and complex. Some clinicians switch patients who are taking long-acting insulin (e.g., glargine) to intermediate-acting insulin 1 to 2 days before surgery because of potentially increased risk for hypoglycemia with the former. However, if the basal insulin is correctly calibrated, it is reasonable to continue long-acting insulin while the patient is NPO and is on intravenous dextrose. No data are available to support one approach over the other. For our patient, who underwent a morning procedure for which breakfast and lunch were likely to be missed, we did not administer any short-acting insulin on the morning of surgery; also, we gave two thirds of a dose of long-acting insulin to provide basal insulin during the procedure and to prevent ketosis. Dextrose-containing intravenous solution (dextrose with water or one half isotonic saline) at a rate of 75 to 125 mL/hr is used to provide 3.75 to 6.25 g glucose/hr to avoid the metabolic changes of starvation.42 Postoperatively, in this elderly patient with NPO status, frequent, small doses of short-acting insulin (sliding scales) could be used to correct elevated glucose levels, if present.

The operating room should be set up in advance and equipment checked by the surgical team. Because massive bleeding may be encountered, the airway surgeon should make sure that laser equipment is available and that the team has easy access to absorbable hemostats for local hemorrhage control, endobronchial blockers, and double-lumen endotracheal tubes for isolating the right lung and providing ventilation to the left lung. Also, some operators may prefer to consult a thoracic surgeon before intervention in case emergent thoracotomy becomes necessary.

Techniques and Instrumentation

The exact bronchoscopic technique used to remove a particular broncholith (i.e., chipping, crushing, probing, pulling, etc.) is operator dependent. We first use a 12-mm rigid bronchoscope. A flexible bronchoscope can then be easily placed down through the rigid scope, and the entire airway evaluated. The broncholith is identified and probed to determine whether it is fixed to the sides of the airway, or whether it is mobile (see Figure 4-1). If bleeding occurs from vascular granulation tissue or from areas adjacent to the broncholith, Nd:YAG or holmium laser can be used, as previously described. In addition, laser can be used to directly shatter the broncholith in selected patients. Suction catheter and a forceps should be ready to remove the broncholith if it becomes loose after manipulation.

Anatomic Dangers and Other Risks

The risk for complications may be lessened by judicious use of advanced imaging techniques, which enhance the bronchoscopist’s knowledge of the relationships of target lesions to critical structures. These techniques may also improve the efficiency of the application of specific endobronchial therapies. Although uncommon, one of the most serious complications that can occur during rigid bronchoscopy with or without the use of lasers includes perforation of the bronchial wall into an adjacent vascular structure and resultant hemorrhage. For a penetrating broncholith, high-resolution CT scanning is needed before extraction to clarify the relationships of the broncholith to the blood vessels. With regard to our patient, at the level of the proximal bronchus intermedius (BI), the interlobar pulmonary artery lies anterior and lateral to the bronchus. The right superior pulmonary vein lies anterior to the right interlobar pulmonary artery (Figure 4-2). Frequently, two veins may be seen in this location and should not be mistaken for lymph node enlargement. Infrequently, a small vein branch draining a portion of the posterior segment of the upper lobe could pass posterior to the BI, then medially at lower levels to join the inferior pulmonary vein.

Long-Term Management

Discussion Points

1. List and justify the instructions given to the patient before bronchoscopy regarding her nil per os (NPO) status.

These guidelines are justified by controlled studies and meta-analyses done in different countries in both adult males and adult females45; these NPO recommendations were shown to be safe and do not increase gastric fluid volume or acidity.

2. List three disorders that could have been responsible for this patient’s broncholith.

3. List three bronchoscopic methods of removing the broncholith.

Expert Commentary

To summarize, the case described is that of an 82-year-old woman with a 2 year history of troublesome chronic dry cough leading to urinary incontinence and recurrent post-tussive syncope. Her cough was refractory to empirical treatment, which included antihistamines/decongestants, bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids, and proton pump inhibitors for post nasal drip syndrome, asthma, and GERD. Her only active comorbid condition, diabetes mellitus, was well controlled with once-daily insulin.

Apparently, the chest radiograph was reported to be normal. On the other hand, noncontrast chest CT showed a calcified lymph node in the right hilum (see Figure 4-1). This led to the possibility of broncholithiasis, which was confirmed by bronchoscopy (see Figure 4-1). Following appropriate preoperative preparation of the patient, she was subjected to general anesthesia, and the broncholith was successfully extracted using a rigid bronchoscope.

This case should alert clinicians to consider a number of issues. These include the difficulty and hence the delay in diagnosis, the causes of broncholithiasis, clinical and diagnostic aspects, and treatment options. All of these are covered in detail in the case discussion. The following require emphasis:

1. Was this patient’s chronic cough caused by the broncholith?

2. Why did it take longer than 2 years to arrive at the proper diagnosis?

Broncholithiasis is an uncommon cause of cough and is seldom considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic cough.49 In the absence of roentgenologic abnormalities, etiologic considerations of chronic cough frequently follow the well-known clinical practice of trying to diagnose and treat common causes such as asthma, post nasal drainage, postinfectious cough, and gastroesophageal reflux. A commonly overlooked but nonetheless important fact is that radiologists and clinicians alike often ignore calcified granulomas on chest roentgenographs. The common occurrence of this abnormality causes it to not be considered in the causation of undiagnosed chronic cough. Even when chest CT reveals calcified lymph nodes or calcified granulomas adjacent to a bronchial lumen, broncholithiasis is rarely taken into account.

3. What caused broncholithiasis in this patient?

4. What are the mechanisms that cause symptoms?

When a calcified lymph node or a pulmonary parenchymal granuloma is located away from the vicinity of the bronchus, it is sometimes referred to as a pulmolith or a pneumolith. These abnormalities, when anatomically located closer to a bronchial lumen, have the potential to become broncholiths. Gradual tracheobronchial impingement occurs as a result of the interaction of fibrocalcific changes with the repetitive visceral motions of respiration, circulation, and deglutition.32,50 Asymptomatic broncholithiasis is extremely uncommon. Indeed, symptoms appear when the calcified lymph node impinges on or erodes into the airway lumen. Bronchial distortion, irritation, and erosion by broncholiths can cause chronic cough, hemoptysis, stone expectoration (lithoptysis), recurrent pneumonia, and fistulas between bronchi and adjacent mediastinal structures.5 It is important to note that the history of lithoptysis is rarely forthcoming unless the patient is specifically asked about it.

5. How is broncholithiasis diagnosed?

6. Is an invasive therapeutic approach required?

7. Was rigid bronchoscopy necessary in this patient?

8. What complications are associated with bronchoscopic extraction?

In conclusion, the patient described exemplifies the typical features of broncholithiasis. From a clinician’s perspective, it is worth remembering the effects of delay in diagnosis, the importance of radiologic imaging, and the crucial role of bronchoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of this disorder. The rarity of the condition frequently excludes it from consideration by physicians who are managing a most common respiratory symptom, chronic cough.

References

1. Irwin RS. Complications of cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006;129:54S-58S.

2. French CT, Fletcher KE, Irwin RS. Gender differences in health-related quality of life in patients complaining of chronic cough. Chest. 2004;125:482-488.

3. Irwin RS, Baumann MH, Bolser DC, et al. American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP). Diagnosis and management of cough executive summary: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006;129:1S-23S.

4. Sen RP, Walsh TE. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy for refractory cough. Chest. 1991;99:33-35.

5. Olson EJ, Utz JP, Prakash UB. Therapeutic bronchoscopy in broncholithiasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:766-770.

6. Shang Y, Bai C, Huang HD, et al. Images for diagnosis: broncholithiasis-induced bronchial artery fistula and pulmonary artery fistula in an aged female: a case report. Chin Med J. 2010;123:507-509.

7. Tsubochi H, Endo S, Suhara K, et al. Endobronchial aspergillosis and actinomycosis associated with broncholithiasis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31:1144-1146.

8. Hammoud ZT, Rose AS, Hage CA, et al. Surgical management of pulmonary and mediastinal sequelae of histoplasmosis: a challenging spectrum. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:399-404.

9. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Maniscalco L. Rigid bronchoscopy and surgical resection for broncholithiasis and calcified mediastinal lymph nodes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:186-190.

10. Chujo M, Yamashita S, Kawano Y, et al. Left sleeve basal segmentectomy for broncholithiasis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;14:101-104.

11. Malone DL, Genuit T, Tracy JK, et al. Surgical site infections: reanalysis of risk factors. J Surg Res. 2002;103:89-95.

12. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043-1049.

13. Araki A, Ito H. Diabetes mellitus and geriatric syndromes. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2009;9:105-114.

14. Weijer C, Singer PA, Dickens BM, et al. Bioethics for clinicians: dealing with demands for inappropriate treatment. CMAJ. 1998;159:817-821.

15. Meyer M, Regan A. Broncholithiasis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:318.

16. Seo JB, Song KS, Lee JS, et al. Broncholithiasis: review of the causes with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2002;22:S199-S213.

17. Seo JB, Lee JW, Ha SY, et al. Primary endobronchial actinomycosis associated with broncholithiasis. Respiration. 2003;70:110-113.

18. Zwiebel BR, Austin JH, Grimes MM. Bronchial carcinoid tumors: assessment with CT of location and intratumoral calcification in 31 patients. Radiology. 1991;179:483-486.

19. Shin MS, Berland LL, Myers JL, et al. CT demonstration of an ossifying bronchial carcinoid simulating broncholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:51-52.

20. Ahn JM, Im JG, Seo JW, et al. Endobronchial hamartoma: CT findings in three patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:49-50.

21. Kim HY, Im JG, Song KS, et al. Localized amyloidosis of the respiratory system: CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;23:627-631.

22. Song JW, Im JG, Shim YS, et al. Hypertrophied bronchial artery at thin-section CT in patients with bronchiectasis: correlation with CT angiographic findings. Radiology. 1998;208:187-191.

23. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e159-e241.

24. Aust MR, Prakash UB, McDougall JC, et al. Bronchoscopic broncholithotripsy. J Bronchol. 1994;1:37-41.

25. Miks VM, Kvale PA, Riddle JM, et al. Broncholith removal using the YAG laser. Chest. 1986;90:293-297.

26. Ferguson JS, Rippentrop JM, Fallon B, et al. Management of obstructing pulmonary broncholithiasis with three-dimensional imaging and holmium laser lithotripsy. Chest. 2006;130:909-912.

27. Snyder RW, Unger M, Sawicki RW. Bilateral partial bronchial obstruction due to broncholithiasis treated with laser therapy. Chest. 1998;113:240-242.

28. Moersch HJ, Schmidt HW. Broncholithiasis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1959;68:548-563.

29. Cole FH, Cole FHJr, Khandekar A, et al. Management of broncholithiasis: is thoracotomy necessary? Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;42:255-257.

30. Arrigoni MG, Bernatz PE, Donoghue FE. Broncholithiasis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1971;62:231-237.

31. Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, Ceithaml EL, et al. Surgical management of broncholithiasis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;90:842-848.

32. Faber LP, Jensik RJ, Chawla SK, et al. The surgical implication of broncholithiasis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;70:779-789.

33. Yi K, Lee H, Park S, et al. Two cases of broncholith removal under the guidance of flexible bronchoscopy. Korean J Intern Med. 2005;20:90-91.

34. Menivale F, Deslee G, Vallerand H, et al. Therapeutic management of broncholithiasis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1774-1776.

35. Potaris K, Miller DL, Trastek VF, et al. Role of surgical resection in broncholithiasis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:248-252.

36. Larizgoitia I, Pons JM. A systematic review of the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. BJU Int. 1999;84:1-9.

37. Reddy AJ, Govert JA, Sporn TA, et al. Broncholith removal using cryotherapy during flexible bronchoscopy: a case report. Chest. 2007;132:1661-1663.

38. Mathur PN, Wolf KM, Busk MF, et al. Fiberoptic bronchoscopic cryotherapy in the management of tracheobronchial obstruction. Chest. 1996;110:718-723.

39. Brantigan CO. Endoscopy for broncholith. JAMA. 1978;240:1483.

40. Menivale F, Deslee G, Vallerand H, et al. Therapeutic management of broncholithiasis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1774-1776.

41. Gavin LA. Perioperative management of the diabetic patient. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1992;21:457-475.

42. Hoogwerf BJ. Perioperative management of diabetes mellitus: how should we act on the limited evidence? Cleve Clin J Med. 2006;73(suppl 1):S95-S99.

43. Kauffman CA. Histoplasmosis: a clinical and laboratory update. Clin Micr Rev. 2007;20:115-132.

44. French CT, Irwin RS, Fletcher KE, et al. Evaluation of a cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Chest. 2002;121:1123-1131.

45. Søreide E, Eriksson LI, Hirlekar G, et al. Pre-operative fasting guidelines: an update. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:1041-1047.

46. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologist Task Force on Preoperative Fasting. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:896-905.

47. Søreide E, Holst-Larsen H, Reite K, et al. Effects of giving water 20-450 ml with oral diazepam premedication 1-2 h before operation. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71:503-506.

48. Brady M, Kinn S, Stuart P. Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. CD004423

49. Prakash UBS. Uncommon causes of cough. ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2006;129:206S-219S.

50. Baum GL, Bernstein L, Schwarz J. Broncholithiasis produced by histoplasmosis. Am Rev Tuberc. 1958;77:162-167.

51. Lin CS, Becker WH. Broncholith as a cause of fatal hemoptysis. JAMA. 1978;239:2153.

52. McLean TR, Beall AC, Jones JW. Massive hemoptysis due to broncholithiasis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52:1173-1175.

53. Bollengier WE, Guernsey JM. Broncholithiasis with aorto-tracheal fistula. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1974;68:588-592.

54. Groves LK, Effler DB. Broncholithiasis: a review of twenty-seven cases. Am Rev Tuberc. 1956;73:19-30.